Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 14:31 |
^^ I don't even know what you mean by "adding a chart for her", Iván.
Please, can't you keep the two websites separated? I posted the chart because some people may find it interesting. I know you don't think it's a good idea ... but you're not the only one involved in this discussion.
Edited by Mr ProgFreak - June 11 2009 at 14:32
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 14:29 |
Nice graphic though.
|
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 14:00 |
In that case she wouldn't be added and would be no need for a chart, because we only add new features top bands that are already added.
That on the other hand would be a problem, beccause a lot of people would tag bands like Iro9n Maidenm or Steely Dan as non Prog but they would remain added, what would lead to a contradiction.
Your system only works in an open site that
a) Admits any band
b) Oly after reading the chart you decide where they go.
In our case we couldn't open a chart for Tori Amos until she's added, and then would be futile because the policy of the site is not to remove bbands already added.
And no Mike, I don't believe it's a good idea at all.
Iván
|
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 13:49 |
^ if you think that's a good idea ... go ahead. You're the one who brought it up. I can however show you what the numerics at PF currently say about Tori Amos:
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 13:45 |
Well Mike propose the Administrators to implement the numerical chart, let them decide.
Iván
|
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 13:42 |
^ are you really not getting this?
"What does proggy means? We use the word Progy to describe bands that don't even deserve to be here"
Let's assume that you spelled it wrong and indead meant "proggy". What I meant was that you're already using a scale of progressiveness here:
not prog proggy prog-related prog
see? No need to introduce anything from my site here (that was never my point) - you already have it. Fewer steps, no numerics, but the general idea is the same: Some pieces of music are less prog than others.
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 13:36 |
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
That's true of course, but that was never the subject here.
|
Mike, you brought the issue here when saying that we need tto make a scale of Progresiveness and even blamed me for not liking it.
And yes, our systems are different..."Vive la différence"....Not all the sites can be exact.
Iván
|
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 13:16 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
OK Mike, you win, this not the place for a debate.
Just on thing...Arrogant?
|
Please, it's not about winning or losing. I just meant that telling people not to use the word "proggy" will most likely not come across as overly friendly. As a matter of fact I think the word fits for many of Tori Amos' albums.
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Isn't Progfreak a site based on ratings and Prog Archives a site based on review?
Everybody is touchy lately.
Iván |
That's true of course, but that was never the subject here. This thread is about whether Tori Amos is Non-Prog, Prog-Related or Prog ... and those distinctions are used at PF and here alike. The process used to assign this information to artists and albums is different of course.
|
|
Tony R
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 12:55 |
One of my favourite albums is called Amosfears and that was a concept album. Sort of.
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 12:43 |
OK Mike, you win, this not the place for a debate.
Just on thing...Arrogant?
Isn't Progfreak a site based on ratings and Prog Archives a site based on review?
Everybody is touchy lately.
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - June 11 2009 at 12:46
|
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 12:25 |
^ sorry ... what was your point again?
There are many websites about progressive music ... they will always be using different labels and definitions than this one. You're free to ignore others, or pretend that the word "proggy" doesn't exist ... but it won't help in these discussions, and you'll come across as being arrogant.
Like it or not, PA uses a system that's similar to that of PF ... the difference is that here there are only three steps (Non-Prog, Prog-Related, Prog) instead of the ten steps at PF, and the split between Approach and Style at PF. There are other more subtle differences of course, but in the end it boils down to assigning a level of progressiveness. You can rant about that all you want, but as soon as you're saying that one band is prog-related and another prog, you are participating in this system.
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 12:08 |
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
Well, it would certainly better if we rated progressiveness on some kind of scale ... so you wouldn't always have to wonder if "proggy" or "Progy" (have it your way, personally I've *never* seen that word on any website) is less prog than "prog-related". But wait a moment ... you don't like that either. |
If we had levels (Which IMO is absurd because Music is not an exact science), we would have the same problems, people claiming that a 10 in PA means less than a 10 in Proggnosis for us.
This is Prog Atrchives, a site based in reviews, not Progfreak, a site based in ratings. that used to be called Ratingfreak
Lets also remember there's people willing to give Dire Strait at least a 5 over 10 in "prgressiveness" and Boston a 8 or 9, so being that the rating will be assigned mostly by people who like her music, would be as futile as not having them.
Plus you make the case when you say you never seen the word in other sites.
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
IMO "proggy" means the same as prog-related, at least when used on other websites. Here it usually means "less than prog-related".
|
There you go, ˇ"At least when used in other websites" we need a degree for PA and a degree for other sites, we will end as universities in Perú (our system of grades is from 0 to 20) that consider a 15 of a private school as excellent and a 15 from our terrible publics schools as worth nothing.
For me Proggy means nothing, you can call REM proggy,a band needs to be Prog or Prog Related to be added.
But at the end, other sites serve only as a reference, we don't need to take in consideration other sites except to qualify a band as controcversia if not included in two or three sites.
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - June 11 2009 at 12:13
|
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 11:40 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
"angeproggt" means "proggy", simply put.
|
What does proggy means? We use the word Progy to describe bands that don't even deserve to be here.
Iván |
Well, it would certainly better if we rated progressiveness on some kind of scale ... so you wouldn't always have to wonder if "proggy" or "Progy" (have it your way, personally I've *never* seen that word on any website) is less prog than "prog-related". But wait a moment ... you don't like that either. IMO "proggy" means the same as prog-related, at least when used on other websites. Here it usually means "less than prog-related".
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 11:31 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
What does proggy means? |
It's green, slimy, jumps around a lot, can catch flys with it's tongue, and can sing come cool tunes?
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 11:23 |
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
^ if you gathered from that bio that Tori Amos is AOR, then perhaps you should not try to read German texts ... |
Mike, the AOR thing was taken from Lucas mention and from the Babylaue list of artists, but I believe it's mediocre not to try to do things, if you try you will faill sometimes, if you don't try you will never faill but never suceed either.
Despite this fact and that I said that my German was rusty I even attempted to translate something nobody else did.
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
"angeproggt" means "proggy", simply put.
|
What does proggy means? We use the word Progy to describe bands that don't even deserve to be here.
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - June 11 2009 at 12:16
|
|
|
Dalezilla
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: July 28 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 5113
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 06:14 |
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 05:51 |
Dalezilla wrote:
Slarti, I have it and have listened to it once. Really enjoying it so far!
And she's definitely not a Kate Bush clone.
|
I don't find calling her a clone is insulting necessarily. I could tell from her earlier works that she was certainly influenced by Kate and that's what got me into her in the first place. I'm going to let Abnormally Attracted To Sin finish sinking in for a little while and then I'll probably post a review of it here and maybe attempt to make the case for her inclusion in prog related or somewhere else. But hey, even if she isn't prog or accepted as prog around here, she still makes great music. She can out perform many prog keyboardists. I love her intriguing, provocative, and very often very moving lyrics. She's one of those artists where I really always have to get her latest whenever it comes out, and each album ends up reminding of what was going on in my life at the time when I go back and listen to it. Yeah, fanboy since Pretty Good Year pretty much.
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
Dalezilla
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: July 28 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 5113
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 04:27 |
Slarti, I have it and have listened to it once. Really enjoying it so far! And she's definitely not a Kate Bush clone.
|
|
Chris S
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 03:40 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Lucas..............ART POP = PROG?
It sounds to me more like artistic Pop, something I can admit but again IMO no relation with Prog.
BTW: I don't speak German, beyond the basics (Despite my rusty Deutsch, her bio is not clear about her being Prog, only mentions she started as a Kate Bush clone and developed an own "angeproggten" style, which if I'm not wrong means AOR), so i stay with the English and Spanish sites, and she's (or at least was the last time I checked) in none,
BTW: The German site apparently considers AOR as Prog....We don't
This is not determinant of course, but a good reference.
BTW: If Kate Bush is in Prog Related, I don't see how a clone of her can be in a full Prog sub-genre.
Iván |
I think you make a very important point here Ivan regarding KB being in Prog Related, the similarities of TA making a similar case.......I guess that swings both ways in that KB and TA would fit Crossover also. Personally I do not think TA was ever a clone of Kate Bush or her music, she is a fine musician in her own right and more prolific, so the article is wrong in my opinion. It would be like saying Fish was a clone of PG, there again that view point may carry more weight.
|
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: June 11 2009 at 01:20 |
^ if you gathered from that bio that Tori Amos is AOR, then perhaps you should not try to read German texts ... "angeproggt" means "proggy", simply put.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.