![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123> |
Author | |
Phil ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 17 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1881 |
![]() |
No !!! Great band, some tracks that might lay claim to being proggy, but NO!!!!
As others have said, "prog" and "great" music are not necessarily one and the same. Just because they're great doesn't merit inclusion. Yes, I am fussed about it. They're basically a blues band with some rocky licks.
|
|
![]() |
|
chopper ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Essex, UK Status: Offline Points: 20033 |
![]() |
As much as I love Led Zep, I don't think they're prog enough to be included here. However there is (at least) one prog site that has included them - http://www.progressiveears.com/default.asp?bhcp=1
|
|
![]() |
|
Abstrakt ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 18 2005 Location: Soundgarden Status: Offline Points: 18292 |
![]() |
Some of their stuff is prog-like, but they are no prog band
|
|
![]() |
|
Australian ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: June 13 2006 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 3278 |
![]() |
Why would they be included? They are one of the greatest rock bands but they are in noe way prog.
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Fassbinder ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: May 27 2006 Location: My world Status: Offline Points: 3497 |
![]() |
I don't mind LZ inclusion.
|
|
![]() |
|
crimson thing ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: April 28 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 848 |
![]() |
Maybe if we capped the number of bands who could be allowed in........then for every band we wanted to include, as long as we could agree on an ejection..........although that does sound like the first step on the way to "Prog Brother".........
![]() |
|
"Every man over forty is a scoundrel." GBS
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Padraic ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
![]() |
My sentiments exactly. I've always felt "prog-related" could get out of hand very quickly. I think this site could use a big disclaimer of some sort: "PROG is not a badge of honor, it's a method of describing/classifying music. There are many outstanding bands who are not classified as prog; this does not detract from them in any way." No offense to whoever this was, but someone posted a few days ago "Boston is my favorite band - why aren't they listed here?" See what I mean? It's like this place is a musical country club - "what, you're saying my favorite band isn't good enough to get in?" Need to find a way to quell this sentiment. Edited by NaturalScience - June 19 2006 at 17:02 |
|
![]() |
|
Arsillus ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 26 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7374 |
![]() |
No!
Led Zeppelin is a great band, but not prog. As I've heard some other member(s) echo, this is PROG archives, not GOOD MUSIC archives. All prog is good music (except neo
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Philéas ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: June 14 2006 Status: Offline Points: 6419 |
![]() |
Not prog, but prog related for sure. If Queen's here, so should Zep be.
Look at the description of the prog related category and you'll
see.
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Peter ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
![]() |
Well, the Beatles, some death metal and even Fairport Convention are here....
![]() What the hey -- just bring in ALL the 70s & 80s bands we like. (Prog is a meaningless term now, in any case.)
![]() |
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
|
![]() |
|
Vompatti ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: October 22 2005 Location: elsewhere Status: Offline Points: 67458 |
![]() |
Some of their songs are very proggy (Achilles Last Stand, No Quarter, Kashmir...) but most of their music is not even prog-related. I don't mind if they're included, but I don't think they should be.
|
|
![]() |
|
Ricochet ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 27 2005 Location: Nauru Status: Offline Points: 46301 |
![]() |
NO.
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Raff ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 29 2005 Location: None Status: Offline Points: 24429 |
![]() |
My thoughts exactly (though I voted for yes). They're much too influential to be left out. Perhaps we should consider a separate section for those classic late '60s bands like Zep, Cream and The Who that had some influence on the development of prog, at least as far as some seminal bands are concerned. |
|
![]() |
|
Kord ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: May 23 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 329 |
![]() |
NO.....and take out queen.....I agree with him Edited by Kord - June 18 2006 at 08:55 |
|
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5f/Genesis_Group.jpg" border">
|
|
![]() |
|
DeepPhreeze ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: April 02 2006 Status: Offline Points: 261 |
![]() |
No --- and take Queen out of the site too.
|
|
![]() |
|
nursethisviper ![]() Forum Newbie ![]() Joined: April 15 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 21 |
![]() |
I'm on the fence here. Were I to argue for Led Zep's prog-... uh, prog-ness (?) I would use totally different songs. In the Light and No Quarter are, in my opinion, definitely prog songs. Maybe even some more songs like Kashmir, Stairway, or Carouselambra qualify. (I promise I'm not just picking their longest songs, it's a sheer coincidence As much as I love all those songs, and almost everything Zep did, I just can't see them as a real prog band in the same way as Genesis or even Deep Purple is. Prog-related, though? I don't see why not. It becomes increasingly difficult as Zep's career goes on to find bands, including prog bands, that didn't include some aspect of Zep in their own work. For example, Tool has been known to do a fairly sizeable number of Zep covers at their shows (They even did a studio version of No Quarter... which I don't recommend.) Zeppelin's influence alone is enough to include them to an extent.
Maybe if only IV and after were included... I through III were worthless in terms of prog.
|
|
![]() |
|
Abstrakt ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 18 2005 Location: Soundgarden Status: Offline Points: 18292 |
![]() |
Of course. Great Band on a Great Site
|
|
![]() |
|
el böthy ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: April 27 2005 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 6336 |
![]() |
mmm I dont know let me think...NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Dont take this the wrong way, Zeppe is one of my favorite bands...if not my favortie...but they are not prog |
|
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Peace Frog ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 17 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 994 |
![]() |
One of my favourite bands, but they just really aren't prog. Well some songs (No Quarter, Achilles Last Stand, Stairway to Heaven, etc.) are sorta prog-ish, but not really that much. Slightly prog-related at most.
|
|
![]() |
|
The Miracle ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: May 29 2005 Location: hell Status: Offline Points: 28427 |
![]() |
No. I love them to bits, but they don't belong here. The whole prog related thing is a joke IMO, and they're not prog enough to pe in proto prog. They influenced hard rock and metal by far more than they did prog.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |