Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - How can metal be prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHow can metal be prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 15>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 10 2008 at 04:57
Originally posted by topofsm topofsm wrote:

I think this guy says there's no such thing as prog metal because he doesn't like it.


I think he is saying that prog(ressive) metal isn't Prog.

I don't think that in itself necessarily have to be thought of as an insult, uninformed or trolling. It just comes across like it here.

Any random listen of the streams in the prog metal section and most of the albums I've checked out, shares so little with prog and so much with plain metal I'm not surprised people keeps bringing this issue up. More knowledgable people than Progmonster2008 (and most of us) thinks the same. I've seen this done in a more enlightened and openminded way by others, here and elsewhere, previously.

Prog metal with a strong relation to what naturally belongs on this site, exists. Fine. But I rarely agree with you metalheads what should qualify. Most of you seem to think that an outrageous concept, keyboards and some classicalsounding topping (still mainly as primitively incorporated in the music/compositions as in Days of Future Passed from '67), is more than enough to transform ordinary metal into prog.
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 10 2008 at 04:44
Originally posted by Avantgardehead Avantgardehead wrote:

Avant-jazz seems to have jazz-fusion, prog, and avant-garde beat! But finding the good stuff is a chore....


Google 'Taran's Free Jazz Hour', if you're not familiar with it already. That should help you find the good stuff.
Back to Top
Avantgardehead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 29 2006
Location: Dublin, OH, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1170
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 10 2008 at 04:39
Avant-jazz seems to have jazz-fusion, prog, and avant-garde beat! But finding the good stuff is a chore....
http://www.last.fm/user/Avantgardian
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 10 2008 at 02:49
Originally posted by PROGMONSTER2008 PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:

 
I think prog and fusion has more exciting ideas in regards to melody than typical jazz imo


I don't. Sure, you get brilliant folks like Allan Holdsworth, but he's the exception rather than the rule. Though if we're talking guitar, jazz *seems* somewhat lacking.

Edit - and if by 'fusion' you also mean people like Frank Gambale, Dave Weckl and similar, then I absolutely don't agree.


Edited by Visitor13 - December 10 2008 at 02:50
Back to Top
topofsm View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1698
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 20:40
I think this guy says there's no such thing as prog metal because he doesn't like it. Saying stuff like, "Only a few listens, and then you're done" only means that he's unable to see the creative aspects of progressive and extreme/tech metal.  I beleive he has not realized that music is a subjective thing and that the genre progressive metal exists whether he likes it or not.
 
I for one, prefer the progressive and tech/extreme metal far more than the classics, but I enjoy the classics too. I respect that many people may only listen to classic prog and detest any type of metal whatsoever, but I expect people to accept and respect other people's opinions. I do not campaign against symphonic prog saying that "overly happy melodies and pointless complexities that Yes and Genesis use will only get so far, because you can only listen to the light stuff for a little bit".

Back to Top
PROGMONSTER2008 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 09 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 610
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 18:36
Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Originally posted by PROGMONSTER2008 PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:

Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Originally posted by PROGMONSTER2008 PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:

Originally posted by Avantgardehead Avantgardehead wrote:

Metal is prog in a completely different way than rock is, and I think that's what throws a lot of people off.
 
Well I believe prog was/is supposed to be jazz/classical based rock music full of awesome clever melodies. The type of melody which makesd you think, how did they come up with that. But prog metaI doesn't do that hardly ever. Playing technical only gets you through a couple of listens then it's history.  I don't like the idea of lumping true prog with prog metal. They are completely different forms of music with the word prog in their name. Oh yeah, true prog is way better Embarrassed. I blame the critics for naming it progressive rock in the first place because it's not about inventing new music. It's just quality music written by creative musicians. Most Modern prog bands have actually taken the name 'progressive literally' but that's not what it's about imo Smile


Let's take this logic to its ultimate conclusion, shall we? If it's classical and jazz (among others) that make prog rock 'prog', then why waste time listening to prog at all? My recent listening habits reeinforce this conclusion - hardly any prog, 70s' or modern, and lots of classical and jazz instead.
 
Because prog has something jazz and classical doesn't. It's the combination of rock/jazz and classical which makes it so good Smile


'Because prog has something jazz and classical doesn't. '

You mean mellotrons?

Let's see:

Melody - classical and jazz trumps prog. 'How did they come up with that', you ask? It's simple - often they took it from classical and jazz musicians.

Rhythm - again, you will find better-developed rhythms in jazz and classical (not only Western classical). not that prog drummers or bassist are bad, but it's the jazz guys (playing jazz) that really blow me away

Wealth in instrumentation? Again, classical and jazz reign supreme.

Complexity? Don't get me started on that...

Even these stupid time signatures are better done in classical - Stravinsky, anyone?



'It's the combination of rock/jazz and classical which makes it so good'

Never heard a really good rock/classical combo. Sure, you get folks like Gentle Giant, and they're talented and enjoyable, but when you listen to classical later, you forget about them instantly.

Jazz/classical combo - Ellington or Stan Kenton, anyone?
 
I think prog and fusion has more exciting ideas in regards to melody than typical jazz imo


Edited by PROGMONSTER2008 - December 09 2008 at 18:37
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 16:52
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:


I don't listen to metal. In fact, I don't have any friends


You blew your chance of getting one when you failed to notice that it's Art Zoyd who is cold and robotic and not Xenakis Tongue



Henry Plainview wrote: 

While I think you went too far in your posts after this one, I do agree that people talking about the genius of pure melodic prog are silly because classical does pure melody so much better (even though I greatly prefer the sweeping romantics to Bach). 

While I largely stand by what I said - especially the melody thing - I was aiming for a healthy dose of reductio ad absurdum . Yeah, I'm on a prolonged non-prog binge, but  if I really thought good prog was so inferior to some other forms of music, I wouldn't be here.


Where did that sad music discussion come from, btw Confused ? And seriously, pretty much only bad music makes me sad. Ok, some lyrics are really depressing, but it's just the lyrics and not the music.  Good music, whether stylised as 'dark' or not, is always a joy to listen to for me.


EDIT: Messed up the quotes.


Edited by Visitor13 - December 09 2008 at 16:55
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35804
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 15:45
I tend to like contrast in my music (light/ dark, humorous or fun/ serious, major/ minor keys... transitions in mood.)  I think that the best bands are commonly very versatile and diverse in approach.  
Back to Top
crimson87 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 15:36
Originally posted by Avantgardehead Avantgardehead wrote:

Heh, happiness is severely underrated. I can't stand most sad music (and especially depressing music like Opeth) because it doesn't sound genuine and I think of trendy teenagers moping around, writing poetry, and humming lines from these sad songs with quivering voice and teary eyes.

Although some good sad music would be maudlin of the Well and The Dears.
 
My thoughts , exactly. If you can see more than enough depressing stories on TV. Why do they give us more depressing stuff like Marillion's Brave?
Back to Top
Avantgardehead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 29 2006
Location: Dublin, OH, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1170
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 14:27
Heh, happiness is severely underrated. I can't stand most sad music (and especially depressing music like Opeth) because it doesn't sound genuine and I think of trendy teenagers moping around, writing poetry, and humming lines from these sad songs with quivering voice and teary eyes.

Although some good sad music would be maudlin of the Well and The Dears.


Edited by Avantgardehead - December 09 2008 at 14:28
http://www.last.fm/user/Avantgardian
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 14:09
Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Personally, I find if a thread puts forward an argument or debate to which I can find nothing positive to contribute, it can be better all round for me to abstain from posting, as opposed to inserting randomly negative comments which serve no other purpose than to wind up those who may want to discuss the subject concerned.
Why has this thread, which obviously has no purpose other than to antagonize, remained alive while the Wal-Mart thread was cast into oblivion?
Originally posted by crimson87 crimson87 wrote:

Besides why do they have to cover their music with a dark feel? There is no need to do such sad music!!
Because happiness is surprisingly overrated.
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
crimson87 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 14:03
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by crimson87 crimson87 wrote:

You know what the problem with prog metal is: just that they have the egos of a prog musician and a metal one , taking themseves WAY TOOOO SERIOUSLY. I can stand metal when they do it just for fun like Manowar for ex but when they start being too creative they start to piss me off.
 
Ayreon anyone?
 
Besides why do they have to cover their music with a dark feel? There is no need to do such sad music!!  I guess it's a matter of taste  prefer my utopic prog like Yes instead.


Yes Crimson87 nonmetal bands like say King Crimson never did such things. Dark, serious music has no place in prog.
 
KC and VDGG are darker than all the prog metal band's put together , but I don't mind since they are original enough to me.
Besides I refer to Tool's "darkness" to be more specific.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 13:59
Originally posted by crimson87 crimson87 wrote:

It's weird but your advice made me wanna hear their stuff , it's OK if their are sad in not a cliched way like most metal and modern music.



What are some examples of modern music being sad in a cliched way?
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 13:57
Originally posted by HughesJB4 HughesJB4 wrote:

Originally posted by Walker Walker wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Let's get this out of the way right now: melodies belong in the NINETEENTH CENTURY, and I highly disapprove of anyone using them, much less prog.
.
 
I sincerely hope you are joking
 


It's Henry, don't worry.

About 3/4s of his posts have :P written all over them.
Every so often I try making a post without drowning it in emoticons to see if people can tell. But since people sometimes take me seriously when I do use emoticons, it doesn't work very well.
Originally posted by Alberto Muņoz Alberto Muņoz wrote:

Originally posted by PROGMONSTER2008 PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:

Originally posted by ProgBagel ProgBagel wrote:

I'm watching the Porcupine Tree DVD.
 
amatuer ideas, amatuer melodies. I wouldn't recommend PT to a prog listener
This guy is hilarious Big smileLOL
I actually agree with him on that one. It's ok if you like them, but PT should not be the prog torchbearers into the new millenium.
Originally posted by PROGMONSTER2008 PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:

 
lol. Melodies are what makes the best music. Music isn't about trends. That's why you move from band to band quickly because they can't write melodies which will keep you interested for more than a couple of listens. Rythms only get you so far. You just follow what band is popular among metal friends Smile
I don't listen to metal. In fact, I don't have any friends, much less metal friends.
Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Let's get this out of the way right now: melodies belong in the NINETEENTH CENTURY, and I highly disapprove of anyone using them, much less prog.

Otherwise, an '07 troll with 182 posts, interesting.


Actually that settles the debate quite nicely. If you really want melody, you listen to classical.
While I think you went too far in your posts after this one, I do agree that people talking about the genius of pure melodic prog are silly because classical does pure melody so much better (even though I greatly prefer the sweeping romantics to Bach).
Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

And is it just me, or does Art Zoyd sound somewhat like Xenakis? 
 
Not the Xenakis I've heard, but I have fairly limited exposure to him because to me his music is robotic and cold (unlike Art Zoyd). And everyone sounds somewhat like someone else. :P
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
crimson87 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 13:57

It's weird but your advice made me wanna hear their stuff , it's OK if their are sad in not a cliched way like most metal and modern music.

Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 13:53
Originally posted by crimson87 crimson87 wrote:

 
Besides why do they have to cover their music with a dark feel? There is no need to do such sad music!!


Advice:  steer clear of Univers Zero.  Wink
Back to Top
crimson87 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 13:52
Originally posted by Avantgardehead Avantgardehead wrote:

Metal is prog in a completely different way than rock is, and I think that's what throws a lot of people off.
 
Yeah , I guess the metal way of being prog is through technical atributes and the classic prog one through compositions. Genesis musicians can't do anything against prog metal virtuosos , in technical aspects.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 13:51
Originally posted by crimson87 crimson87 wrote:

You know what the problem with prog metal is: just that they have the egos of a prog musician and a metal one , taking themseves WAY TOOOO SERIOUSLY. I can stand metal when they do it just for fun like Manowar for ex but when they start being too creative they start to piss me off.
 
Ayreon anyone?
 
Besides why do they have to cover their music with a dark feel? There is no need to do such sad music!!  I guess it's a matter of taste  prefer my utopic prog like Yes instead.


Yes Crimson87 nonmetal bands like say King Crimson never did such things. Dark, serious music has no place in prog.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
crimson87 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 13:47
You know what the problem with prog metal is: just that they have the egos of a prog musician and a metal one , taking themseves WAY TOOOO SERIOUSLY. I can stand metal when they do it just for fun like Manowar for ex but when they start being too creative they start to piss me off.
 
Ayreon anyone?
 
Besides why do they have to cover their music with a dark feel? There is no need to do such sad music!!  I guess it's a matter of taste  prefer my utopic prog like Yes instead.


Edited by crimson87 - December 09 2008 at 13:49
Back to Top
Alberto Muņoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2008 at 10:04
Originally posted by PROGMONSTER2008 PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:

Originally posted by ProgBagel ProgBagel wrote:

I'm watching the Porcupine Tree DVD.
 
amatuer ideas, amatuer melodies. I wouldn't recommend PT to a prog listener
This guy is hilarious Big smileLOL




Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 15>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.310 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.