To edit Jazz Q page
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Report errors & omissions here
Forum Description: Seen a mistake in a band bio etc then please tell us
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=81305
Printed Date: November 22 2024 at 14:33
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: To edit Jazz Q page
Posted By: Lynx33
Subject: To edit Jazz Q page
Date Posted: September 19 2011 at 12:47
|
Hi, I've just browsed Jazz Q's page http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=4050 and I have found that their archives album (1975-1987) named Album které nikdy nevyslo (here marked released in 1975) is categorized as a studio album. I think it should be in the compilation section. here's a page to prove my word: http://www.progboard.com/Jazz-Q/Album-kter-nikdy-nevy-lo-Pozorovatelna/3440 If you also think that it should be corrected, then do so. Thanks. Lynx33 ------------- Mindez elmúlt. Ma már tudom köszönteni a szépséget. |
Replies:
Posted By: NotAProghead
Date Posted: September 19 2011 at 17:21
|
Probably you are right, but it's not clear for me when it was released - in 1975 or in 1987. Google search did not bring the answer. I've sent PM to Marty McFly and asked him to help us. P.S. Translation from Martin Kratochvil website ( http://www.martinkratochvil.com/jazz_q.html" rel="nofollow - http://www.martinkratochvil.com/jazz_q.html ): "In the middle of the eighties there were only two singles with singer Jane Koubková, several records of the time (with Peter and Michael Kocáb Flynem) was published (*???) until 2001 in "Albu, které nikdy nevyšlo" ("Album, which was never released"). Aggregate issue therefore aroused great expectations - not only because the fans of the group so after years of delays, finally got a chance to get a recording that has appeared only on vinyl. At the same time it's no secret that Martin Kratochvil has a rich archive of unreleased recordings and a few years ago he spoke in interviews of notable publishing plans - the next song-album, compiled from the archives, or preserved, yet unreleased recordings from the sixties." *??? - not clear, were or were not published until 2001. It looks like correct release date is 2001. And in case of previously unreleased material I think clasification (studio album or a compilation) depends on author's point of view. Anyway let's wait for Marty's answer. ------------- Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour) |
Posted By: Lynx33
Date Posted: September 19 2011 at 17:34
|
According to the page I'm referring to, it contains material recorded between 1975 and 1987. ------------- Mindez elmúlt. Ma már tudom köszönteni a szépséget. |
Posted By: NotAProghead
Date Posted: September 19 2011 at 17:44
I saw it, but there is no information when each track was recorded. What if all tracks are from 1975 and only a bonus is from 1987? It's unlikely, but who knows. ------------- Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour) |
Posted By: Marty McFly
Date Posted: September 20 2011 at 04:44
|
I'll look into it, gather information, interrogate few suspects, pull out some favours in government - usual stuff :-D
------------- There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless," -Andyman1125 on Lulu  Even my |
Posted By: Marty McFly
Date Posted: September 20 2011 at 05:29
|
As usual, recordings and releases from that era doesn't follow "clean" western ways. We three are all from post communistic countries, so we all know about this (and respective cases in our countries). This link:
CD 1 - archive recordings from 1975-1987 We can leave CD 2 be, it's just new release of old album. But CD 1 are archive recordings. All pages I've read suggests that it was never released. So we have two levels of compilations 1)Album které nikdy nevyšlo is compilation itself So shall we move ------------- There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless," -Andyman1125 on Lulu Even my |
CD 1: archivní nahrávky z let 1975-87Posted By: NotAProghead
Date Posted: September 20 2011 at 16:30
|
Are you sure, Marty, it was never released as a separate album?
If yes, where the cover used on PA  is taken from? ------------- Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour) |
Posted By: Marty McFly
Date Posted: September 20 2011 at 17:17
|
We will never be too sure, simply because there is no decisive info. I saw pages supporting both versions, so we have several scenarios 1)Leave the album as studio album from 1975 2)Leave it as studio album and change the year to 2001 3)Change the year to 2001 and set it to compilation type. 4)Change the year to 2001, set it to compilation type and rename it to ALBUM KTERÉ NIKDY NEVYŠLO + POZOROVATELNA. http://www.google.cz/search?client=opera&rls=cs&q=Album,+kter%C3%A9+nikdy+nevy%C5%A1lo&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=999&bih=773" rel="nofollow - Google images search is quite divided ------------- There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless," -Andyman1125 on Lulu Even my |
Posted By: Marty McFly
Date Posted: September 20 2011 at 17:19
|
For example on this page, release date is 2011 and it is just this one album. But is this source relevant ? http://bigpondmusic.com/album/jazz-q-martina-kratochvíla/album-které-nikdy-nevyšlo-bonusy Maybe that cover is simply taken from this image (edited, cut-paste):
------------- There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless," -Andyman1125 on Lulu Even my |
Posted By: Marty McFly
Date Posted: September 21 2011 at 04:24
|
-Only now, as part of re-edition of key Jazz Q album, Pozorovatelna, new CD composed out of tracks written by Kratochvíl for various artists and recorded during 1975-1987, mostly in author's recording studio Budíkov This is taken from interview by Czech Radio from 2001. You know, Album které nikdy nevyšlo can be taken as a pun - Album that was never released means here that it was never released up until now. So year change is needed (to 2001). It is compilation either way, because it is gathered material from 13 years of recording. The only question now is if we need to bother ourselves with adding + POZOROVATELNA, or leave the title as it is now, only to change year and type. ------------- There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless," -Andyman1125 on Lulu Even my |