Childhood Preferences
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics not related to music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=78573
Printed Date: February 05 2025 at 07:43 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Childhood Preferences
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Subject: Childhood Preferences
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 14:50
Simple question to settle a curiosity of mine in a highly scientific manner. Voting is for you as a child please remember.
I was much more interested in the sciences as a child. Eventually schooling made them unbearably boring and took all of the creativity and discovery out of them. I have clearly returned to them later in life.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Replies:
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 14:51
Science and math, easily, and probably fairly obvious for those who know me.
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 14:51
Always the arts for me.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 14:56
History, geography and biology: the dissection of fishes is always a "hit" with children.
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 14:57
I have to say reading, although I was also very interested in science. In first grade I wanted to be chemist, although later I changed my mind when I realized what it was chemists actually did. :P
Formaldehyde always made me sick so I couldn't do much of the biology stuff.
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:04
I was more interested in Literature, History, Theology, etc.
But I was a pretty good student until I discovered women..
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:09
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
I was more interested in Literature, History, Theology, etc.
But I was a pretty good student until I discovered women..
Iván |
lol, for me substitute beer for women, but yeah.
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:15
Books here. Jules Verne, Alexandre Dumas, the Bible, Jack London, Kipling, ETA Hoffmann, Michel Zevaco, James Cook, soviet adventure & war novels, etc. And especially copious amounts of tales from all over the world - Arab, Persian, Central Asian, African, Balkan, Chinese, the Grimm brothers, etc.
|
Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:34
The arts, I suppose, inlcuding history. But I did enjoy cutting up cats and pigs in Biology.
------------- ...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:40
By child I had meant pre-high school, pre-teenage years. I quite enjoyed that also, but I didn't personally have the opportunity until high school.
I did dissect a gold fish that my dad had won for me at a carnival after the fish died (due to an experiment itself of mine), but that wasn't exactly a supervised activity.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:41
The arts no doubt. Except I do enjoy social studies. I am still a child, btw.
------------- http://blindpoetrecords.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: TheGazzardian
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:41
I liked science, math, english, art, music, and computers. I guess I was pretty evenly split?
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:42
I think most of us liked just about everything. I was a voracious reader of fiction back then. But surely there was a preference in some direction?
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:44
I was an avid fiction reader as well and I still am but the books are much more existentialist and surreal. Although I did enjoy 1984 at a particularly young age, 5th grade.
------------- http://blindpoetrecords.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:48
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
By child I had meant pre-high school, pre-teenage years. I quite enjoyed that also, but I didn't personally have the opportunity until high school.
I did dissect a gold fish that my dad had won for me at a carnival after the fish died (due to an experiment itself of mine), but that wasn't exactly a supervised activity.
|
Gotcha. It would still be the Arts. I still have the weathered and worn copy of Bulfinch's Mythology which I devoured in 5th grade (loved Norse and Greek myth as well as the Arthurian cycle at the time).
We cut up frogs in 7th grade and fetal pigs in 8th, which in Catholic school would still be considered "grade school".
------------- ...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
|
Posted By: TheGazzardian
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:50
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
I think most of us liked just about everything. I was a voracious reader of fiction back then. But surely there was a preference in some direction?
|
It's hard to remember if I really preferred any over the others but I'll vote arts anyways because my dream back then was to become an author.
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:51
The Truth wrote:
The arts no doubt. Except I do enjoy social studies. I am still a child, btw. |
It's more about you as you were before being a teenager. Pat also pointed that out.
|
Posted By: Proletariat
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 17:13
Literature, history, geography etc
------------- who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 18:00
Science, maths and drawing. Through most of my school and college years I had problems with words, but numbers I could understand - they made sense to me so science was something I could simply do because it was just applied maths (except biology, which I didn't care too much for).
I guess it was the technical aspects that attracted me to drawing, I wasn't much of a painter back then, (I came 2nd in a painting competition when I was 8, the boy who won first prize had just coloured-in one of my discarded drawings... that amused me at the time and it still does 46 years later), I certainly was not a reader (I didn't become a voracious [great word] reader that until I was a teenager) and I hated having to write anything, but I loved to draw structure and spaces between things - I remember a teacher once chastised me for using a ruler, set-square, compasses and worse of all, an eraser in an art lesson -to me it seemed silly not to. I could have become a draughtsman in later life if I hadn't discovered you could mess around with electronics and get paid for it, but I was just too messy and scruffy to work in a drawing office - what was supposed to be a pristine technical drawing looked more like a charcoal sketch by the time I was finished with it ...
------------- What?
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 18:10
5th Grade??? Wiki tells me that's 10-11 year-olds... I was reading Edgar Rice Burroughs and H G Wells then, but not much else aside from DC & Marvel comics and an ancient set of The Children's Encyclopedia by Arthur Mee that I used to sit and read for hours on end.
------------- What?
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 23:02
A little bit of everything. I was never well defined in my likes, which ended up bringing problems when time came to choose a career...
-------------
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 02:28
Arts. I've always loved music, and though I guess I disliked the structure of art classes, I like visual art. And I do like and respect drama a lot.
I hated chemistry in school and no doubt would have hated physics if I had to take it. Too abstract. Biology I liked. Zoology I liked most. Animals. There right there, easy to visualize and know. Ecosystems are easy to visualize. Atoms, forces, chemical structures...not so much.
Now, I can appreciate them somewhat, but I can't say I like them or really care about the research that goes into them, except for it's practical purposes. I guess that makes me like 99% of the world then in that respect.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: someone_else
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 02:47
A slight preference for science and maths.
-------------
|
Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 03:25
I am quite eclectic when it comes to wisdom i know stuff from many different topics, that is why I do it so well in 5 oit out of 6 Trvial Pursuit I can answer quite well on all the topics exept math, were i suck donky balls.
I can much about geographie, history, sports, arts and literature, endertainment, science and nature
-------------
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 03:37
aginor wrote:
I can answer quite well on all the topics exept math, were i suck donky balls.
|
Well it's certainly a novel way of doing maths but not one I'd consider because it is a binary system.
------------- What?
|
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 05:18
Personally, the sciences went right over my head - just couldn't get them (still can't, to be honest - my brain must work in a different manner), all except for mathematics, where I appear for some reason to have a natural aptitude.
No, my real loves at school were Art, Drama, English Literature - lessons I actually looked forward to
-------------
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 08:24
Dean wrote:
5th Grade??? Wiki tells me that's 10-11 year-olds... I was reading Edgar Rice Burroughs and H G Wells then, but not much else aside from DC & Marvel comics and an ancient set of The Children's Encyclopedia by Arthur Mee that I used to sit and read for hours on end. |
I first read Lord of the Rings then. It's not that early of an age for real books.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 09:54
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
Dean wrote:
5th Grade??? Wiki tells me that's 10-11 year-olds... I was reading Edgar Rice Burroughs and H G Wells then, but not much else aside from DC & Marvel comics and an ancient set of The Children's Encyclopedia by Arthur Mee that I used to sit and read for hours on end. |
I first read Lord of the Rings then. It's not that early of an age for real books.
|
No it isn't, (the "???" was my ignorance of American "grade" ages, not exclamation of the age itself ), I'm sure lots of 10 & 11 year olds read lots of real books, as I said, I wasn't a reader at that age, I read the Hobbit in my first tyear of high school but just didn't like it enough to want to read LotR.
------------- What?
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 09:56
I misunderstood the ???
I really enjoyed the Hobbit when I first read it. Now that I've read it since then I realize how different it is from LotR. It's really a book to read when you're a child.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: Proletariat
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 16:09
5th grade I was reading LotR, Call of the Wild... books that I can still read that are literary and worth while. but also Redwall and Hardy Boys and things that are not worth going back to at all.
------------- who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 16:44
^ I loved Call Of The Wild when I was in Junior School, and Emil and the Detectives and Mary Norton's Borrowers books. Oh dear, it seems I was more of a reader than I remember. ... ... Nah, I didn't get seriously into books until I was 15 or 16, from then on I would be reading several books a week up until fairly recently.
------------- What?
|
Posted By: Formentera Lady
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 20:23
Although I work in the technical field, my interest was always music and literature... as a child and now.
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 11:45
I had already read Crime and Punishment by Dostoyevsky by age 11....
Of course when I read it again about 10 years later it was SO much better....
-------------
|
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 11:48
I didn't start reading 'real' books until high school, where I was first introduced to Animal Farm.
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 12:02
The T wrote:
I had already read Crime and Punishment by Dostoyevsky by age 11....
Of course when I read it again about 10 years later it was SO much better.... |
Same here! Fifth grade. But I don't think I've missed anything by reading it so early. Karamazov Brothers, now that's different...
|
|