Print Page | Close Window

Progressive rock: a man's genre?

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: General Music Discussions
Forum Description: Discuss and create polls about all types of music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=78337
Printed Date: February 20 2025 at 12:13
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Progressive rock: a man's genre?
Posted By: Slaughternalia
Subject: Progressive rock: a man's genre?
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 12:14
Alright, I realize that there are certainly female proggers, but compared to other genres, the fan base it overwhelmingly male oriented. Don't deny it. I have met tons of prog rock fans, and not a single one has been female. Without sounding sexist, why do you think this is?

Personally, I think it has to do with the female mind often finding more of an emotional connection with more personal, nice sounding music. When I asked my mother why she hates Genesis so much, she said it sounded dissonant and made her feel anxious.

Sorry if that sounds sexist, because I'm really not at all. What are your thoughts?



Replies:
Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 12:16

I actually have met more females who like the stuff I listen to than males (excluding online) so I don't really think that it's a "man's genre" specifically.



-------------
http://blindpoetrecords.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: silverpot
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 12:41
It's because men have more spare time. Women have to tire themselves with housework instead of relaxing in front of the stereo. LOL


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 12:42
My mother (like my father when he was alive, by he was very vocal in his disdain for rock and pop music) only listens to classical music by choice (she does quite like some jazz too).  I played her some Art Zoyd from Generations Sans Futur whilst she was in my car, and she said it was far too dissonant for her.  That said, she did enjoy a fair amount of U Totem's debut (I avoided some parts) and she did like Aranis.

My wife has said that the music I listen to goes on too long, is dull, and often sounds like soundtrack music, which would be fine if it was background music ina  film, but not to listen to.  I do like pop music that she likes, such as Abba (it's her favourite band, but I still know Abba better than her).  The only ones I can think of that she has liked in PA that I've played for her are Mellow Candle, Supertramp, and Alan Parsons Project (plus various songs by various artists such as as some PFM).

A complaint I've heard from various females is that the music I listen to is weird and not melodic.  I get the same weird complaint about music from males, but they don't complain about it not being melodic.  I don't know anyone in real life who shares my Prog Archives-type tastes in music  (some of it, sure, like King Crimson, but not the more avant-oriented music).


Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 12:46
And yeah, most girls I know just spend their time doing other things although they still enjoy the music.

-------------
http://blindpoetrecords.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 12:47
Well, considering out of all my friends, family, acquaintances, and such, online or otherwise, I don't know a single human being who even so much as knows of prog rock's existence except for myself and my girlfriend, and she only knows because I told her about it, it's a difficult question to answer. I mean, folks around here sometimes like the big names (KC, Yes, Genesis, Pink Floyd), and my friends tend to enjoy popular prog metal (Dream Theater, Fates Warning, Queensryche, etc.), but neither group does so because of the prog status. Mostly if a friend likes a prog metal band, he does so because I introduced it to him. I honestly hate the music tastes of all my friends. It's not that I think mine is better, but mine is certainly more diverse. 

I definitely think that prog rock (and artsy fartsy music in general) is more related toward the male mentality. Sure, prog/art rock had a few very notable females, like Annie Haslan or Kate Bush, but take the leading forces behind the genre: Fripp, the entire bands of Pink Floyd, Yes, Genesis, Rush, Jethro Tull, VDGG, Gentle Giant, Camel, etc. etc. They were male-fronted, male-written songs and bands. In 1971 most guys had a choice between Aqualung and Carole King's Tapestry. Which do you think most adolescent males would rather listen to? Locomotive Breath or So Far Away?

Music and the arts in general are very much male-oriented. What are most female writers noted for? Vampire love stories or well-to-do british women looking for a husband. Anne Rice blah blah blah. Where's the female 1984, the female Brave New World? It's not that women are less artistic (but in my experience, most women seem more interested in painting/photography than any other art, but that's nothing more than an assessment of my locale, not a generalization), it's not that women are less artistic. They just spent so long being dominated by men in nearly every way that they didn't have a chance to grow into it. So really, if women would rather hear Justin Bieber over Jethro Tull, it's men's fault for being so damn vile. That, and most girls don't care about space operas and WWII battles and such. I don't either, but hey!

My point is that of course prog is man-oriented and male-dominated. Now that I've said that, let me go ahead and say that starting from the 1930's and up, from Billie Holiday to Joan Baez and Carole King and Kate Bush and Cocteau Twins and Joni Mitchell and Janis Joplin and all that, some women have made some flabbergastingly brilliant music to my ears. 


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 12:48
Originally posted by silverpot silverpot wrote:

It's because men have more spare time. Women have to tire themselves with housework instead of relaxing in front of the stereo. LOL

Are you saying working a full time job and helping raise a kid gives more free time than housework? Wink


Posted By: Valentino
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 12:50
Come on, Yes and Genesis are girly as it is.

Also, I know more Pink Floyd fans who are girls than guys.


Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 12:52

I think this sits best in the general music discussions, as it has already covered a variety of styles and artists.

Unlike previous attempts at this topic, lets see if we can keep it devoid of sexist remarks and jokes.
 


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 13:00
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

I think this sits best in the general music discussions, as it has already covered a variety of styles and artists.

Unlike previous attempts at this topic, lets see if we can keep it devoid of sexist remarks and jokes.
 

That takes the fun out of it. Can't we find a logical solution? What's the point of debating factual evidence? Either more guys like prog than girls or more girls like prog than guys. Why? Well, it's a trillion reasons. We can speculate all we want, but until we find out through cold, hard, psychological study and fact, this will end up being dick joke central.

Which brings me to my thesis statement: What did the penis say to the mailman? Hey, pal, how can you get aHEAD around here?

Get it? He's living in a residential area where he can send and receive postage! Har har!

So yes, why do more men like Genesis than women? Why do more men prefer 1984 over Interview with a Vampire? Who is a better writer, Anne Rice or George Orwell? Who the better songwriter, Tom Waits or Carole King? It's an opinion, there. It'll be sociological, genetic, psychological, circumstantial, emotional, and a big chain. Its a big chain, it's a grim and whip dim ganglyroo. Vim and bandersnatch for you, yon vorpal sword with golden hue, can cut with wring wrought snapping, true, and slice the bandersnatch in two. Hello my honey, hell my darlin', hello my ragtime gal!


Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 13:05
I think genre is a progressive rock fan issue...



-------------


Posted By: Vompatti
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 13:06
I think it has to do with the manly subjects of the songs, like shining flying purple wolfhounds and stuff.


Posted By: Slaughternalia
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 13:10
Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

I think this sits best in the general music discussions, as it has already covered a variety of styles and artists.

Unlike previous attempts at this topic, lets see if we can keep it devoid of sexist remarks and jokes.
 

That takes the fun out of it. Can't we find a logical solution? What's the point of debating factual evidence? Either more guys like prog than girls or more girls like prog than guys. Why? Well, it's a trillion reasons. We can speculate all we want, but until we find out through cold, hard, psychological study and fact, this will end up being dick joke central.

Which brings me to my thesis statement: What did the penis say to the mailman? Hey, pal, how can you get aHEAD around here?

Get it? He's living in a residential area where he can send and receive postage! Har har!

So yes, why do more men like Genesis than women? Why do more men prefer 1984 over Interview with a Vampire? Who is a better writer, Anne Rice or George Orwell? Who the better songwriter, Tom Waits or Carole King? It's an opinion, there. It'll be sociological, genetic, psychological, circumstantial, emotional, and a big chain. Its a big chain, it's a grim and whip dim ganglyroo. Vim and bandersnatch for you, yon vorpal sword with golden hue, can cut with wring wrought snapping, true, and slice the bandersnatch in two. Hello my honey, hell my darlin', hello my ragtime gal!
Nobody's expecting a definitive answer with universal agreement to come out of a thread like this. I was just hoping for some interesting opinions.


Posted By: Prog Geo
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 13:11
Well, one thing I have to say. I find it very strange that there aren't many women in this site. I think that it's a man's genre. Someday I hope meeting a girl who will listen to prog rock (and extreme prog metalWink). It's difficult in Greece.  

-------------
Sonorous Meal show every Sunday at 20:00 (greek time) on http://www.justincaseradio.com


Posted By: Slaughternalia
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 13:16
Originally posted by Valentino Valentino wrote:

Come on, Yes and Genesis are girly as it is.

Also, I know more Pink Floyd fans who are girls than guys.
Women tend to like Pink Floyd far more than other prog rock for some reason. I've always felt that Floyd doesn't fit in perfectly with the whole "prog rock" thing. Their music has pretty simple structure, and is driven mainly by emotion


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 13:17
I think that it has often been a man's genre, but also that many women are becoming aware of it and appreciating it more.  I did put on "Foxtrot" so that my sisters and mom could hear it, so that they would at least know there was a Genesis before "Invisible Touch." 


Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 13:23
'Prog toilet syndrome'. I sometimes wish I was female when I'm at a concert and bursting for a peeLOL
Prog rock is geeky and there are lot more male geeks than female geeks.I bet its the same with other geeky things such as sci-fi and ermm.. trainspottingEmbarrassed


Posted By: cannon
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 14:57
Prog doesn't have enough "romance" in it for most woman. I think the time signature shifts are a dischord for them and the "long winded noodling" is a turn off. I've never meet a woman who likes prog.Cry


Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 15:39
God damn it, did you really need to start this thread again? Really?

-------------
if you own a sodastream i hate you


Posted By: Slaughternalia
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 15:42
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

God damn it, did you really need to start this thread again? Really?
Hey, not all of us have been here since 2008


Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 15:45
Originally posted by Slaughternalia Slaughternalia wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

God damn it, did you really need to start this thread again? Really?
Hey, not all of us have been here since 2008

Even a cursory search would reveal many, many pages of posts on this subject that you could read instead of making a new thread. Some things should not be discussed anymore. 

-------------
if you own a sodastream i hate you


Posted By: Andy Webb
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 16:01
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by Slaughternalia Slaughternalia wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

God damn it, did you really need to start this thread again? Really?
Hey, not all of us have been here since 2008

Even a cursory search would reveal many, many pages of posts on this subject that you could read instead of making a new thread. Some things should not be discussed anymore. 

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/search_form.asp" rel="nofollow">Forum SearchSearch

It's helpful.


-------------
http://ow.ly/8ymqg" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 17:01
^^ CryBroken Heart


LOL


Posted By: lucas
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 17:11
Today I listened to Renaissance (the band).

-------------
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)


Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 18:38
Originally posted by Slaughternalia Slaughternalia wrote:

Originally posted by Valentino Valentino wrote:

Come on, Yes and Genesis are girly as it is.

Also, I know more Pink Floyd fans who are girls than guys.
Women tend to like Pink Floyd far more than other prog rock for some reason. I've always felt that Floyd doesn't fit in perfectly with the whole "prog rock" thing. Their music has pretty simple structure, and is driven mainly by emotion
well Pink Floyd is kinde of a huuuuuuge band, not only are they a top tier prog band....they are among the top greats of rock and british invation as well. Pink Floyd is as much a common house-hold name as vacume cleaner or re-frigerator are/is, they sold 200 million records . its huuuuuge, they are not only BIG but are  like SUPER BIG

-------------


Posted By: Slaughternalia
Date Posted: May 15 2011 at 23:58
Originally posted by lucas lucas wrote:

Today I listened to Renaissance (the band).
I could've assumed you weren't referring to the historical era. Also I'm pretty sure that Annie didn't actually write any of the music


Posted By: Slaughternalia
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 00:00
Originally posted by Andyman1125 Andyman1125 wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by Slaughternalia Slaughternalia wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

God damn it, did you really need to start this thread again? Really?
Hey, not all of us have been here since 2008

Even a cursory search would reveal many, many pages of posts on this subject that you could read instead of making a new thread. Some things should not be discussed anymore. 

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/search_form.asp" rel="nofollow">Forum SearchSearch

It's helpful.
Face it, that post was just an excuse to link to the search page like that


Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 00:21
My wife and I have similar tastes in music. Similar but not exact. She has a far greater collection of classical CDs and prefers not to listen to anything loud and obnoxious. So I play Black Sabbath when she's not around.

-------------
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 10:17
Why should women waste their time in the sexist sausage fest that is rock music when they get justly deserved recognition without cheap comments about their looks in jazz and classical music (more academic and serious, eh!)? I am dumbfounded to see that some people would actually use the prog fan ratio of men to women that deduce that women are not interested in serious music or things that more or less suggest such a belief (not so far in this thread, for small mercies!).  Oh, and I am pretty sure Gone with the Wind, Good Earth, Rebecca are just silly, trivial vampire stories.  

There will be fewer women artists of great renown than men for some more time in most fields of art simply because 'we' let them do 'our' stuff much later and they've had to catch up with us. For all that, however, if you are even reasonably well informed, you should find female musicians, writers etc of undeniable talent.  The bitter truth is that since majority of listeners are also men, they are not interested in what a woman has to say and won't give credit where it's due and then go on pretending it's a man's world. Sure thing!     


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 10:23
Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

 In 1971 most guys had a choice between Aqualung and Carole King's Tapestry. Which do you think most adolescent males would rather listen to? Locomotive Breath or So Far Away?


And in the 70s, you also had Joan Baez  or Joni Mitchell.  Since I have not been initiated to Dagmar Krause, I won't comment on her.  And as for dissonance or, essentially, aesthetic ugliness, what about Diamanda Galas? I grant that most people would not have had access to an artist like Diamanda Galas but that certainly doesn't wash with Joan Baez or Joni Mitchell.  There is plainly latent bias against women in rock music. I have often seen fans second guess each and every of their actions and intentions in ways they never would with men - as if a woman cannot possibly be interested in music even if she devotes a liftetime to it. I don't think there's anything outrageous about this. Given the text of many a rock lyric, tongue in cheek though it may be, there is bound to be benign sexism in rock.


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 11:06
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

 In 1971 most guys had a choice between Aqualung and Carole King's Tapestry. Which do you think most adolescent males would rather listen to? Locomotive Breath or So Far Away?


And in the 70s, you also had Joan Baez  or Joni Mitchell.  Since I have not been initiated to Dagmar Krause, I won't comment on her.  And as for dissonance or, essentially, aesthetic ugliness, what about Diamanda Galas? I grant that most people would not have had access to an artist like Diamanda Galas but that certainly doesn't wash with Joan Baez or Joni Mitchell.  There is plainly latent bias against women in rock music. I have often seen fans second guess each and every of their actions and intentions in ways they never would with men - as if a woman cannot possibly be interested in music even if she devotes a liftetime to it. I don't think there's anything outrageous about this. Given the text of many a rock lyric, tongue in cheek though it may be, there is bound to be benign sexism in rock.

For the record, I prefer So Far Away to Locomotive Breath, but prefer Aqualung as a whole over Tapestry as a whole. I emotionally concur with a lot you have to say, Rogerthat.


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 11:11
Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

 
For the record, I prefer So Far Away to Locomotive Breath, but prefer Aqualung as a whole over Tapestry as a whole. I emotionally concur with a lot you have to say, Rogerthat.

I do too, it was just not a like-and-like comparison, that was my point.  How about choosing between Barbara Dennerlein and Joey De Francesco? So much tougher.  And if you asked the Baldies, they would probably say it's not even tough, it's Barbara all the way.


Posted By: Lizzy
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 11:37
Originally posted by Freddie Mercury Freddie Mercury wrote:


Oh, s**t, all that crap again?

(:


-------------
Property of Queen Productions...


Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 13:57
Originally posted by Slaughternalia Slaughternalia wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

God damn it, did you really need to start this thread again? Really?
Hey, not all of us have been here since 2008


This is the kind of comment which should become a meme: "I'm a academical music critic - I'm on the net since 2008".


Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 14:07
not personal opinion but this thread needs this song
 
Tongue
 


-------------


Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 14:14
Originally posted by CPicard CPicard wrote:

Originally posted by Slaughternalia Slaughternalia wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

God damn it, did you really need to start this thread again? Really?
Hey, not all of us have been here since 2008

This is the kind of comment which should become a meme: "I'm a academical music critic - I'm on the net since 2008".

I'm actually a relative noob to the internet, I only got online around 2003-2004. But I think I have made up for that at least in part with sheer volume...

-------------
if you own a sodastream i hate you


Posted By: QuestionableScum
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 14:25
My mom likes No-Man, Anekdoten, Camel and Pink Floyd, and some other prog.

I have a female friend who likes some prog metal as well. 

But to answer the question I really don't know. However, I will say that even in other genres like electronica or indie music there are generally far more males who are really into the music than females. But this could be simply coincidence or perhaps because of the way that females are socialized.


Posted By: silverpot
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 15:03
Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

Originally posted by silverpot silverpot wrote:

It's because men have more spare time. Women have to tire themselves with housework instead of relaxing in front of the stereo. LOL

Are you saying working a full time job and helping raise a kid gives more free time than housework? Wink


Smile  Well, in my country women work a full time job, raise kids AND do most of the housework. (i did write that as a joke though)

It's only now, in my late fifties, that I have the time to really indulge in my interest in music. Just like I did in my youth. Hubby always found the time somehow though. LOL

Anyway, you're absolutely right about the diffuculties women have always had with trying to get heard, read or viewed as artists.


Posted By: Pietro Otello Romano
Date Posted: May 19 2011 at 06:59
Recently I've seen "Prog Rock Britannia an Observation in Three.Movements" a documentary about the golden age of Progressive Rock by BBC.

They said that Prog Rock was a type of music for a public of "white, middle upper class men". Geek
I can claim that, during that period, it wasn't; I mean , at least in Italy, where I spent that period of my life, there were many girl's fan of prog music. Approve
But now, It seems that ladys not only dislike the genre, but they even don't have a memory of the past's popularity of this music. Unhappy

What do you think about that? Embarrassed

Are there some ladies or black people's member willing to give an opinion about the reason why of thatQuestion


-------------
"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful

what we pretend to be."



Mother Night - Kurt Vonnegut


Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: May 19 2011 at 10:24
As an all inclusive site, it probaby best to avoid racial or genre stereotyping. Let's just enjoy the music.


Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: May 19 2011 at 16:39
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

As an all inclusive site, it probaby best to avoid racial or genre stereotyping. Let's just enjoy the music.
As much as I hate this thread, I do think it's interesting that the famous musicians of many genres tend to be fairly homogeneous. But it's hard to discuss that without people getting angry.

-------------
if you own a sodastream i hate you


Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: May 19 2011 at 21:43
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

As an all inclusive site, it probaby best to avoid racial or genre stereotyping. Let's just enjoy the music.
As much as I hate this thread, I do think it's interesting that the famous musicians of many genres tend to be fairly homogeneous. But it's hard to discuss that without people getting angry.
 
Yes, we wouldn't want the truth interfering with political correctness. Wink


-------------
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 20 2011 at 09:40
Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

As an all inclusive site, it probaby best to avoid racial or genre stereotyping. Let's just enjoy the music.
As much as I hate this thread, I do think it's interesting that the famous musicians of many genres tend to be fairly homogeneous. But it's hard to discuss that without people getting angry.
 
Yes, we wouldn't want the truth interfering with political correctness. Wink

Mentally disabled workers complete their tasks with less perceived efficiency, in general. This is terribly offensive, I'd wager. I wonder if we have any mentally disabled proggers in the vicinity. 

I keep coming back to this site every half a year or so, and forgetting how much I suck at following rules, making friends, and not being an abrasively venomous cockface. 

For example:

Person 1 - Woohoo, summer's here!
Person 2 - How's the new [insert movie here], Charles?
Person 1 - Excellent! Did you ever [insert progressing hobby here]. Rudolph?
Alitare - Ground control to Major Tom: Rush sucks a lot.
Person 1 - Golf damned TROLL!
Person 3 - lulwut?
Easy Livin' - BANHAMMER

Doo-doo-doo-doo  doo-doo-doo-doo. You just got a slingshot.


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 20 2011 at 11:13
A discussion at home about why women seem to take after individual sporting events more than team sports made me think of another perspective to this.  Maybe women don't attach so much importance to the concept of a band or a group/team, which is everything in rock.  This is also a stereotyped and generalized observation, but well, just a thought...maybe that's why they are not so interested in rock? The ranks of women in classical music orchestras have swelled but maybe prestige and snob value is a factor there.


Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: May 20 2011 at 13:59
I think female singer songwriters/ troubadours are more interesting today then the male counterparts, espessially in Norway and Sweden, like Lykke Li and Susanne Sundfør more spontanous and free thinkers,  braver I would say.

-------------


Posted By: Pietro Otello Romano
Date Posted: May 22 2011 at 08:37
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

As an all inclusive site, it probaby best to avoid racial or genre stereotyping. Let's just enjoy the music.


I am really sorry about the way my post may sounds, but however I didn't mean to be racial or stereotyping any genre at all.
English is not my mother tongue and sometimes I have some problem to express a concept in the proper way.Embarrassed

I was just thinking that a topic about the reason why, mostly prog doesn't appeal to anyone but white male, is quite a sterile discussion, without the opinion of anyone else that is not a "white male", and I was calling any of them available to join this topic because their opinion only could add some interesting information in the matter.

Of course maybe they've already done, and I am sorry if I just didn't get it...? But I still stress the point that 30 years ago I was still enjoying nice chat with many member of the other sex about the matter, but currently it looks like a very difficult issue.Big smile



-------------
"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful

what we pretend to be."



Mother Night - Kurt Vonnegut


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 22 2011 at 10:15
Originally posted by Pietro Otello Romano Pietro Otello Romano wrote:

I was just thinking that a topic about the reason why, mostly prog doesn't appeal to anyone but white male, is quite a sterile discussion, without the opinion of anyone else that is not a "white male", and I was calling any of them available to join this topic because their opinion only could add some interesting information in the matter.



On the other hand, Opeth, Porcupine Tree and Freak Kitchen have performed in India. Jethro Tull came twice to India (missed them on BOTH occasions Cry).  Several fusioners have performed every now and then in India, notably the incredible Shakti.  Perhaps, part of the problem is critics, be they white males or whomsoever, are not interested in spreading knowledge of prog to anywhere, be it Europe or Asia.  But you folks in Europe (your location says London?) and USA can get in touch with people who caught prog in the 70s or at least who follow contemporary prog rock bands and get to know of the music.  But you will never see Red album or SEBTP mentioned as rock essentials in a place like India.  To expect all music lovers to have the curiosity to read on the internet and find out is unrealistic. This sort of relates to what I had brought up earlier. Are guys at all interested in reaching out outside their coveted circle?  Without such an effort, obviously the profile of fans of a particular genre may get homogeneous.  But there's nothing in the music itself that would alienate those who are not white males as such.  I know people who listen to prog and I have even picked up Canterbury classics like Rotter's Club in stores but it's bound to be a minority because there's no awareness and critics would rather you listen to November Rain all over again rather than Firth of the fifth.  


Posted By: Pietro Otello Romano
Date Posted: May 22 2011 at 11:34
[/QUOTE]

On the other hand, Opeth, Porcupine Tree and Freak Kitchen have performed in India. Jethro Tull came twice to India (missed them on BOTH occasions Cry).  Several fusioners have performed every now and then in India, notably the incredible Shakti.  Perhaps, part of the problem is critics, be they white males or whomsoever, are not interested in spreading knowledge of prog to anywhere, be it Europe or Asia.  But you folks in Europe (your location says London?) and USA can get in touch with people who caught prog in the 70s or at least who follow contemporary prog rock bands and get to know of the music.  But you will never see Red album or SEBTP mentioned as rock essentials in a place like India.  To expect all music lovers to have the curiosity to read on the internet and find out is unrealistic. This sort of relates to what I had brought up earlier. Are guys at all interested in reaching out outside their coveted circle?  Without such an effort, obviously the profile of fans of a particular genre may get homogeneous.  But there's nothing in the music itself that would alienate those who are not white males as such.  I know people who listen to prog and I have even picked up Canterbury classics like Rotter's Club in stores but it's bound to be a minority because there's no awareness and critics would rather you listen to November Rain all over again rather than Firth of the fifth.  
[/QUOTE]

...and I don't know why, they work quite hard to may look prog as a silly and useless genre too.
Unfortunately not even in Europe or USA. Here for example M. Jackson is the king of pop, and weird enough, Genesis are the ones for sillies!Unhappy
However, I am mostly agree with your post, but what we can do about that?


-------------
"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful

what we pretend to be."



Mother Night - Kurt Vonnegut


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 22 2011 at 11:46
Originally posted by Pietro Otello Romano Pietro Otello Romano wrote:

 
...and I don't know why, they work quite hard to may look prog as a silly and useless genre too.
Unfortunately not even in Europe or USA. Here for example M. Jackson is the king of pop, and weird enough, Genesis are the ones for sillies!Unhappy
However, I am mostly agree with your post, but what we can do about that?

Nothing really, I am just attributing proper cause to this phenomenon.  Prog has a smaller following because the critics sell it short, as simple.  People will listen to anything that's drilled into their head as essential a thousand times over. This does not mean all such things necessarily constitute bad music but most listeners would rather the music walk up to their speakers than they find out about the music and get around to it.  And I am not really finding fault with that either because it's just human tendency and pretty normal. I am much more passive when it comes to seeking out great cinema even though I quite enjoy a film made with serious intent and executed with thoughtfulness and am not necessarily a pop cinema buff. I can devote the little bit of time that work leaves aside for me to the one art form of music but there's no room left for similar application with cinema.


Posted By: Lozlan
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 12:16
Ah. This topic, yet again.

I recently had the humbling experience of playing Floyd's Animals for my fiancee (who is a classically trained pianist, a feminist literary scholar, and a rabid fan of contemporary indie-girl rock and classic disco). She was very quick to remark on the exclusionary nature of the music - it was not created to appeal to her, it did not address issues of womanhood, it deals with dystopic concepts that have been repeatedly branded as purely masculine. As men, we have the distinct privilege of being constantly pandered to by art. The differences between men and women's appreciation of art (be it prog, dadaist poetry, or Victorian literature) do not lie in fundamental differences between the genders; instead, the difference is derived from the overarching oppression of patriarchy.

Think about it this way: There is a traceable correlation between ice cream sales and murder rates. We could, after a moment's digestion of the data, assume that murdering people causes people to buy more ice cream, or vice versa. However, the actuality is that people eat more ice cream and murder more people when it is oppressively hot outside. Similarly, women finding prog unenjoyable does not point to a fundamental difference in their appreciation of art and sentiment. It is so easy to make lazy mental correlations! Remember that art does not exist in a vacuum: it is always the product of the artist's dominant episteme. That means that men make art that is inaccessible to women because it is a very direct expression of the oppressing gender's positionality in society. I very much doubt that a slave would ever revel ion the music created by an oppressive master.

In short, prog is a little boy's treehouse with a cardboard sign nailed to it saying, quite clearly, 'NO GIRLS ALLOWED.' I do love the genre, obviously, but arguments like the one opening this thread can occasionally make me embarrassed to be a prog fan.

Also, all this nonsense about women not writing great books is ridiculous. Ursula K. LeGuin, Margaret Atwood, Joanna Russ, Octavia Butler, Virginia Woolf...the list of truly groundbreaking women novelists is as vast as the sea. In fact, it was women who pioneered the novel as a viable form of art. Writers like Orwell and Huxley pale (in my humble opinion) in comparison to the Bronte sisters, George Eliot, or Mary Shelley.


-------------
Certified Obscure Prog Fart.

http://scottjcouturier.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow - The Loose Palace of Exile - My first novel, The Mask of Tamrel, now available on Amazon and Kindle


Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 18:47
Originally posted by Lozlan Lozlan wrote:

Ah. This topic, yet again.

I recently had the humbling experience of playing Floyd's Animals for my fiancee (who is a classically trained pianist, a feminist literary scholar, and a rabid fan of contemporary indie-girl rock and classic disco). She was very quick to remark on the exclusionary nature of the music - it was not created to appeal to her, it did not address issues of womanhood, it deals with dystopic concepts that have been repeatedly branded as purely masculine. As men, we have the distinct privilege of being constantly pandered to by art. The differences between men and women's appreciation of art (be it prog, dadaist poetry, or Victorian literature) do not lie in fundamental differences between the genders; instead, the difference is derived from the overarching oppression of patriarchy.

Think about it this way: There is a traceable correlation between ice cream sales and murder rates. We could, after a moment's digestion of the data, assume that murdering people causes people to buy more ice cream, or vice versa. However, the actuality is that people eat more ice cream and murder more people when it is oppressively hot outside. Similarly, women finding prog unenjoyable does not point to a fundamental difference in their appreciation of art and sentiment. It is so easy to make lazy mental correlations! Remember that art does not exist in a vacuum: it is always the product of the artist's dominant episteme. That means that men make art that is inaccessible to women because it is a very direct expression of the oppressing gender's positionality in society. I very much doubt that a slave would ever revel ion the music created by an oppressive master.

In short, prog is a little boy's treehouse with a cardboard sign nailed to it saying, quite clearly, 'NO GIRLS ALLOWED.' I do love the genre, obviously, but arguments like the one opening this thread can occasionally make me embarrassed to be a prog fan.

Also, all this nonsense about women not writing great books is ridiculous. Ursula K. LeGuin, Margaret Atwood, Joanna Russ, Octavia Butler, Virginia Woolf...the list of truly groundbreaking women novelists is as vast as the sea. In fact, it was women who pioneered the novel as a viable form of art. Writers like Orwell and Huxley pale (in my humble opinion) in comparison to the Bronte sisters, George Eliot, or Mary Shelley.

Just when I thought we had extracted all possible silliness from this topic....

Why does art have to specifically discuss issues of womanhood to avoid oppressing women? Is Free Jazz by Ornette Coleman an oppressive tool of the patriarchy as well? There are no words about anything, and as far as I know there were no women involved in the original production of the album. Even the cover art is by a man!

I think that many of the words written about this subject on this forum are embarrassingly sexist, and I'll even concede from my fuzzy memory that 1984 is probably a bit sexist. But I think it is you who is being sexist by saying that women apparently can't enjoy dystopias because they're often not about women. Animal Farm isn't even about human beings, I cannot imagine how one could make it "feminine." 

I assure you I am aware of correlation vs causation, but I really have no idea what it has to do with the rest of your paragraph. I'll give you some of its neckbearded fans are certainly repulsive, but how does progressive music itself actively discourage women from listening to it?

I don't think anyone said anything about women writing books? Although Frankenstein sucked kthx. 


-------------
if you own a sodastream i hate you


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 19:55
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

 
Why does art have to specifically discuss issues of womanhood to avoid oppressing women? Is Free Jazz by Ornette Coleman an oppressive tool of the patriarchy as well? There are no words about anything, and as far as I know there were no women involved in the original production of the album. Even the cover art is by a man!

I think that many of the words written about this subject on this forum are embarrassingly sexist, and I'll even concede from my fuzzy memory that 1984 is probably a bit sexist. But I think it is you who is being sexist by saying that women apparently can't enjoy dystopias because they're often not about women. Animal Farm isn't even about human beings, I cannot imagine how one could make it "feminine." 

I assure you I am aware of correlation vs causation, but I really have no idea what it has to do with the rest of your paragraph. I'll give you some of its neckbearded fans are certainly repulsive, but how does progressive music itself actively discourage women from listening to it?

I don't think anyone said anything about women writing books? Although Frankenstein sucked kthx. 

I think it was Alitare who compared the Twilight writer to Orwell, which is total bollocks of course.  Jane Austen is very well regarded in literary circles, though I completely abhor that horrible book Sense and Sensibility!  Tongue I agree with you that music or literature doesn't have to deal with only feminist concerns to be perceived as empathetic to or of interest to women audiences.  I would say to expect THAT is sexist.  Why shouldn't a woman be interested in Animal Farm? It's about the world, not 'mankind' to the exclusion of women.  I also do know girls who like dystopian writing, be it this one or Brave New World, so it's not true that dystopia inherently doesn't appeal to women.  It's just that MOST guys would rather watch dumb Arnold Schwarznegger films than read and most girls would rather read Mills and Boon and the minority that visits progarchives.com stereotypes the "other" group by their impression of the majority (believing foolishly that majority of men would also be interested in reading dystopian novels).  


Posted By: Lozlan
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 12:03
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by Lozlan Lozlan wrote:

Ah. This topic, yet again.

I recently had the humbling experience of playing Floyd's Animals for my fiancee (who is a classically trained pianist, a feminist literary scholar, and a rabid fan of contemporary indie-girl rock and classic disco). She was very quick to remark on the exclusionary nature of the music - it was not created to appeal to her, it did not address issues of womanhood, it deals with dystopic concepts that have been repeatedly branded as purely masculine. As men, we have the distinct privilege of being constantly pandered to by art. The differences between men and women's appreciation of art (be it prog, dadaist poetry, or Victorian literature) do not lie in fundamental differences between the genders; instead, the difference is derived from the overarching oppression of patriarchy.

Think about it this way: There is a traceable correlation between ice cream sales and murder rates. We could, after a moment's digestion of the data, assume that murdering people causes people to buy more ice cream, or vice versa. However, the actuality is that people eat more ice cream and murder more people when it is oppressively hot outside. Similarly, women finding prog unenjoyable does not point to a fundamental difference in their appreciation of art and sentiment. It is so easy to make lazy mental correlations! Remember that art does not exist in a vacuum: it is always the product of the artist's dominant episteme. That means that men make art that is inaccessible to women because it is a very direct expression of the oppressing gender's positionality in society. I very much doubt that a slave would ever revel ion the music created by an oppressive master.

In short, prog is a little boy's treehouse with a cardboard sign nailed to it saying, quite clearly, 'NO GIRLS ALLOWED.' I do love the genre, obviously, but arguments like the one opening this thread can occasionally make me embarrassed to be a prog fan.

Also, all this nonsense about women not writing great books is ridiculous. Ursula K. LeGuin, Margaret Atwood, Joanna Russ, Octavia Butler, Virginia Woolf...the list of truly groundbreaking women novelists is as vast as the sea. In fact, it was women who pioneered the novel as a viable form of art. Writers like Orwell and Huxley pale (in my humble opinion) in comparison to the Bronte sisters, George Eliot, or Mary Shelley.

Just when I thought we had extracted all possible silliness from this topic....

Why does art have to specifically discuss issues of womanhood to avoid oppressing women? Is Free Jazz by Ornette Coleman an oppressive tool of the patriarchy as well? There are no words about anything, and as far as I know there were no women involved in the original production of the album. Even the cover art is by a man!

I think that many of the words written about this subject on this forum are embarrassingly sexist, and I'll even concede from my fuzzy memory that 1984 is probably a bit sexist. But I think it is you who is being sexist by saying that women apparently can't enjoy dystopias because they're often not about women. Animal Farm isn't even about human beings, I cannot imagine how one could make it "feminine." 

I assure you I am aware of correlation vs causation, but I really have no idea what it has to do with the rest of your paragraph. I'll give you some of its neckbearded fans are certainly repulsive, but how does progressive music itself actively discourage women from listening to it?

I don't think anyone said anything about women writing books? Although Frankenstein sucked kthx. 


First and foremost, nice opening. Always a pleasure to be needlessly and rudely dismissed in the midst of what has the vague potential to be an intellectual debate. Woot.

I'll admit that, in summoning up the spectre of false correlation, I was a little vague. Let me specify: Men look at women. Women do not listen to prog. Men come to the conclusion that women are 'too emotional' to appreciate prog, that they 'dislike atonality,' or any number of ridiculous conclusions based in gender essentialism. This is a false set of assumptions made by not contextualizing the data. We exist in a fundamentally patriarchal society that conditions women from birth. Personally, beyond the observable difference in genitalia, I'm completely unconvinced that there are any differences between men and women that can't be explained away by this social conditioning.

In short, buying ice cream obviously compels people to commit murder, and women disliking progressive rock obviously means they have a basic genetic difference from men that prevents them from liking 'complicated' music.

EDIT: Admittedly, one is comparing two solid statistical facts, and one is deriving inference from an if-this, then-this supposition. Unfortunately the reasoning behind women's observed dislike of prog can't really be proven or disproven, only argued; even so, It would be really interesting if we could gather some info on how women actually feel about prog, or even some hard data concerning the gender-trend of prog purchasers. If only I'd gone ahead and gotten that psych degree!

Yes, there was discussion concerning books in this thread. Someone was bemoaning the lack of a woman-penned Brave New World, and I was pointing out that women have written lots and lots and lots of tasty perfect literature. Want a woman's dystopia? Read Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale, or potentially LeGuin's The Dispossessed. They're every bit as riveting and complicated as the finest Orwellian nightmare.

Oh, and if Frankenstein sucked (a concept I'm having difficulty wrapping my head around), you should try reading any of the other multitude of novels Mary Shelley wrote. Unfortunately she's fallen victim to the One Woman, One Novel syndrome that plagues female writers, but The Last Man and Mathilda are masterpieces.

As for women reading or listening to men's music/lit...progressive rock is both an intensely innovative and intensely self-indulgent musical genre. This self-indulgence is the result of privilege working behind the scenes to determine artistic output. On the surface we can claim (correctly, too) that prog is striving to elevate popular music to the level of the symphonic and jazz masters; but I ask you, how many of those composers were women? For centuries it was impossible for female composers to achieve any shade of recognition, with the result that classical music is explicitly a man's world. This actually serves as another fantastic example of false correlation: there are no famous female composers, so women must not compose classical music. I can't count on both hands and both feet the number of times I've heard classically trained male musicians comment on women's obvious compositional deficiency, based solely on their under-representation amid the company of Bach, Brahms, and Mendelssohn.

 Oppressed peoples always, ALWAYS pick up on expressions of privilege, especially in art; as Audre Lorde stated, it is impossible to deconstruct the master's house with the master's tools. Although I don't universally agree with this supposition, it does go far in signifying that the master's tools are easily identifiable to those straining for freedom or equality.

Okay. Said my piece. I now humbly await further dismissal.


-------------
Certified Obscure Prog Fart.

http://scottjcouturier.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow - The Loose Palace of Exile - My first novel, The Mask of Tamrel, now available on Amazon and Kindle


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 14:15
I'm lost as to what your point was and I have this gut feeling that your feminist wife has gotten to your head a bit. Are you trying to say that oppressive and patriarchal music is wrong? Can you determine which music is oppressively patriarchal? Are you or your wife the most intellectual beings on this spinning ball of dirt and puddle? I'm all for generalizations (I love ignorant hostility), but I try to refrain from generalizing. 

It's a well-known fact that women were oppressed for ages. Obviously the arts were male-dominated for quite a long time. This served a cultural and survivalist purpose. Racism, too, served a survivalist purpose. Ages past, when one similar group of individuals came about to killing other, dissimilar groups of individuals, they tended to have differing skin colors. Racism, then, was a natural side-effect of geographical conquest. Is it necessary for survival, now? In some cases, perhaps, but as we can see from the rampant growth in toleration in the major developed countries of the world, this primal racial need is being dissipated by the world at large. 

So of course women had their share of oppression. So of course they're probably more inclined to listen to different types of music. Of course there are women who love progressive rock, just like there are women who like to work at law firms, just like there are women who like to vote, just like there are women who like to bake apple pies and give blowjobs. Soooooooooooooooooooooooo, what was your point? 


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 15:13
All these big words and literary mumbo shmumbo, references to art and books and such.......hogwash!!
 
Its all about patience and just listening to the music.....for some reason women have a difficult time doing both with music. And maybe they are better at it than men are, maybe they multi-task better, since men always state...."sitting down and listening to my music...". I don't know any woman that just sits and listens to music, be it Genesis or Celine Dion.
 
Once I explained to my wife the meaning behind The Musical Box she was more interested in hearing the lyrics along with the music. Or even explaining all the parts to SDOIT .....it becomes more listenable to her and she can get it and eventually understand it.
In general when it comes to prog, just like heavy metal, it is difficult for women to get past some of the harshness, loudness (noise) of our music. I bet if you just give them the lyrics, it would spark more of an interest than simply pushing PLAY and tell them......"check this out honey!!!" Its like a 5yr old, the attention span will get them to about 1:45 into a song. I am not degrading either, its just fact, when it comes to music men just have the longer attention span. And some of it is fantasy for us, we want to be that band playing on stage and creating that music.....women could careless about that, I don't think there are many women who actually state "I want to be Celine, Norah Jones, Aretha, Lady Gaga or Kate Bush....."
 
For my wife what gets her interested in my music is all the stuff behind the scenes sometimes.......Neil Peart's losses, Portnoy's 12 part AA suite, Neal Morse's daughters birth defect. Issues that tug at your heart and deeper feelings, rather than trying to decipher Magma's Kobaia and their interacting with people from Earth....yikes!


-------------


Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 16:03
^What? If women had a so low attention span, they would listen to hardcore-punk! Rubbish nonsense! You should get out to the opera or some jazz concerts to see if your great theory is so right.

Yes, it sounds agressive and abrasive, but, for Hell's sake, I even went to several free jazz / improvised music where there were women on stage and in the public! Not to mention a she-friend of mine who is really, really fond of opera (and metal, and traditional folk music)


Posted By: Bonnek
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 16:18
Originally posted by Slaughternalia Slaughternalia wrote:

Alright, I realize that there are certainly female proggers, but compared to other genres, the fan base it overwhelmingly male oriented. Don't deny it. I have met tons of prog rock fans, and not a single one has been female. Without sounding sexist, why do you think this is?

Personally, I think it has to do with the female mind often finding more of an emotional connection with more personal, nice sounding music. When I asked my mother why she hates Genesis so much, she said it sounded dissonant and made her feel anxious.

Sorry if that sounds sexist, because I'm really not at all. What are your thoughts?



Definitely a man's world, look at us here.

But sorry, this "I think it has to do with the female mind often finding more of an emotional connection with more personal, nice sounding music" makes me feel uneasy.

The 'nice' part is why my wife dislikes Prog, because it is too docile, way too mellow, flowery and 'nice' sounding, not to say cheesy (paraphrasing some of her thoughts here)
Not sure what you mean with 'personal' music. All music that hits me, hits me 'personally'. I guess that's the same with everyone, man and woman alike.

Prog is mind music, technical, a bit cold, contrived, it's not sexy, at least not compared to singer songwriters, disco, indie and other genres which have a fanbase that balances more towards female fans.






Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 16:52
Who cares if your wife hates prog. She should be in the kitchen cooking, not listening to albums.

-------------
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 17:33
Originally posted by CPicard CPicard wrote:

^What? If women had a so low attention span, they would listen to hardcore-punk! Rubbish nonsense! You should get out to the opera or some jazz concerts to see if your great theory is so right.

Yes, it sounds agressive and abrasive, but, for Hell's sake, I even went to several free jazz / improvised music where there were women on stage and in the public! Not to mention a she-friend of mine who is really, really fond of opera (and metal, and traditional folk music)
 
The topic is about PROGRESSIVE ROCK music...not jazz or opera. And to my point, opera is very emotional performances that pull at your heart.....I would expect women to enjoy opera rather than a prog rock concert. Jazz is lively and upbeat, you can dance to it even.....If you know my posts, you would know my wife is from New Orleans, jazz is in her blood, we've seen plenty of jazz artists in the French Quarter.
 
Because, to use your words, prog music is abrasive and agressive, the wonderful lyrics can get ignored in a lot of cases. But to us men, since we enjoy the music, we can listen to the lyrics and pull out the meanings quite easily.
 
So why are their no women music reviewers, reviewing prog rock albums?


-------------


Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 18:11
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

The topic is about PROGRESSIVE ROCK music...not jazz or opera. And to my point, opera is very emotional performances that pull at your heart.....I would expect women to enjoy opera rather than a prog rock concert. Jazz is lively and upbeat, you can dance to it even.....If you know my posts, you would know my wife is from New Orleans, jazz is in her blood, we've seen plenty of jazz artists in the French Quarter.
 
Because, to use your words, prog music is abrasive and agressive, the wonderful lyrics can get ignored in a lot of cases. But to us men, since we enjoy the music, we can listen to the lyrics and pull out the meanings quite easily.
 
So why are their no women music reviewers, reviewing prog rock albums?
 
I don't really listen to abrasive and aggressive prog music -- which bands are those precisely? My wife, like myself, enjoys a wide range of music. Our tastes differ in that she listens to classical music more often than I do, but I took her to a Jethro Tull concert when we were dating and she loved it. When Ian Anderson did a solo tour, she surprised me with tickets. She also bought a copy of the Rupi's Dance CD which she won't let me take out of her car.
 
All that being said, I thnk this whole patriarchal music business is a load of crap. We have plenty of Sandy Denny/Fairport and Annie Haslam/Renaissance CDs, but if she's in a rock mood, my wife will grab a Yes, Tull or Moody Blues CD. Or not, sometimes she listens to blues (all old black guys). She listens to whatever the hell she wants, just like I do. The only female singer I think she favors is Alison Kraus (who we saw with Robert Plant - great show by the way). She likes well composed, well sung and played music -- and I really don't think she gives a rat's hairy patoot what gender the musicians are, or whether she should feel inadequate because of some perceived male dominated music genre. The whole thought process is inane and misguided to say the least.
 
Wait a moment, she just home from work...
 
Yeah, so I asked her what she was listening to on her iPod. She answered Great Big Sea, The Waterboys and The Young Dubliners.
 
I asked her if she felt oppressed listening to male dominated Gaelic rock.
 
She answered, "Whatever."
 
 


-------------
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 19:53
Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

The topic is about PROGRESSIVE ROCK music...not jazz or opera. And to my point, opera is very emotional performances that pull at your heart.....I would expect women to enjoy opera rather than a prog rock concert. Jazz is lively and upbeat, you can dance to it even.....If you know my posts, you would know my wife is from New Orleans, jazz is in her blood, we've seen plenty of jazz artists in the French Quarter.
 
Because, to use your words, prog music is abrasive and agressive, the wonderful lyrics can get ignored in a lot of cases. But to us men, since we enjoy the music, we can listen to the lyrics and pull out the meanings quite easily.
 
So why are their no women music reviewers, reviewing prog rock albums?
 
I don't really listen to abrasive and aggressive prog music -- which bands are those precisely? My wife, like myself, enjoys a wide range of music. Our tastes differ in that she listens to classical music more often than I do, but I took her to a Jethro Tull concert when we were dating and she loved it. When Ian Anderson did a solo tour, she surprised me with tickets. She also bought a copy of the Rupi's Dance CD which she won't let me take out of her car.
 
All that being said, I thnk this whole patriarchal music business is a load of crap. We have plenty of Sandy Denny/Fairport and Annie Haslam/Renaissance CDs, but if she's in a rock mood, my wife will grab a Yes, Tull or Moody Blues CD. Or not, sometimes she listens to blues (all old black guys). She listens to whatever the hell she wants, just like I do. The only female singer I think she favors is Alison Kraus (who we saw with Robert Plant - great show by the way). She likes well composed, well sung and played music -- and I really don't think she gives a rat's hairy patoot what gender the musicians are, or whether she should feel inadequate because of some perceived male dominated music genre. The whole thought process is inane and misguided to say the least.
 
Wait a moment, she just home from work...
 
Yeah, so I asked her what she was listening to on her iPod. She answered Great Big Sea, The Waterboys and The Young Dubliners.
 
I asked her if she felt oppressed listening to male dominated Gaelic rock.
 
She answered, "Whatever."
 
 

Yeah, generalizations make an ass outta you and me. Wait... assumptions make gumptions with gumbo and tea.

No, that ain't right. Typifications make criminal stations. HORSEsh*t!

Stereotyping is incessant griping. Naggerjuices! I can't seem to get this right.

One more time: Ignorance is fish. There we have it - if you're ignorant then you smell like big mouthed bass. I accomplished something today.

That's right, I sat through every bloody minute of West Side Story. Christ - a woman must've written that Romeo and Juliet inspired cheese-pudding. I feel titties, such big titties, and I rubbed them from ceiling to wall, and I pity any boy who hasn't got big balls. LALALALALALALALALALA what boner, where?!


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 20:07
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Because, to use your words, prog music is abrasive and agressive, the wonderful lyrics can get ignored in a lot of cases. But to us men, since we enjoy the music, we can listen to the lyrics and pull out the meanings quite easily.
 
So why are their no women music reviewers, reviewing prog rock albums?


Outside prog circles, nobody considers prog, and especially classic prog, 'abrasive' and 'aggressive', they just dub it polite and pretentious, be they men or women.  I have seen women attend extreme metal concerts so I don't think the abrasiveness has anything to do with it. I don't know if you grew up in a family that listens to prog, because otherwise you'd be used to the idea that only a small minority likes prog, whether it's men or women and most people don't warm up to it.   Has nothing to do with 'inherent differences' between men and women. To reiterate my earlier point, 'we' assume that 'they' think differently, don't like this or can't do that and hence don't canonize female artists on merit the way we ought to, which reinforces the impression of it being a man's genre. But there are a lot of women who listen to rock-related music and lot of women making or performing it too. 


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 20:09
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Because, to use your words, prog music is abrasive and agressive, the wonderful lyrics can get ignored in a lot of cases. But to us men, since we enjoy the music, we can listen to the lyrics and pull out the meanings quite easily.
 
So why are their no women music reviewers, reviewing prog rock albums?


Outside prog circles, nobody considers prog, and especially classic prog, 'abrasive' and 'aggressive', they just dub it polite and pretentious, be they men or women.  I have seen women attend extreme metal concerts so I don't think the abrasiveness has anything to do with it. I don't know if you grew up in a family that listens to prog, because otherwise you'd be used to the idea that only a small minority likes prog, whether it's men or women and most people don't warm up to it.   Has nothing to do with 'inherent differences' between men and women. To reiterate my earlier point, 'we' assume that 'they' think differently, don't like this or can't do that and hence don't canonize female artists on merit the way we ought to, which reinforces the impression of it being a man's genre. But there are a lot of women who listen to rock-related music and lot of women making or performing it too. 

Yeah, and Courtney Love was in a band. What difference does it make?


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 20:17
Originally posted by Lozlan Lozlan wrote:


As for women reading or listening to men's music/lit...progressive rock is both an intensely innovative and intensely self-indulgent musical genre. This self-indulgence is the result of privilege working behind the scenes to determine artistic output. On the surface we can claim (correctly, too) that prog is striving to elevate popular music to the level of the symphonic and jazz masters; but I ask you, how many of those composers were women? For centuries it was impossible for female composers to achieve any shade of recognition, with the result that classical music is explicitly a man's world. This actually serves as another fantastic example of false correlation: there are no famous female composers, so women must not compose classical music. I can't count on both hands and both feet the number of times I've heard classically trained male musicians comment on women's obvious compositional deficiency, based solely on their under-representation amid the company of Bach, Brahms, and Mendelssohn.

 Oppressed peoples always, ALWAYS pick up on expressions of privilege, especially in art; as Audre Lorde stated, it is impossible to deconstruct the master's house with the master's tools. Although I don't universally agree with this supposition, it does go far in signifying that the master's tools are easily identifiable to those straining for freedom or equality.





Is or was?  The orchestra in my city has more female musicians than male, if not an equal number of. And that seems to be the growing trend worldwide, so are we assailing past crimes here?  And I cannot see the correlation between privilege and oppression in prog rock, seems to be as tenuous as between ice cream and murder.  The privilege if any in prog rock was self proclaimed in any case. The critics never bestowed it the status of snob music or recognized its efforts in progressing popular music, so no doors had to be knocked at for entry.  I had suggested earlier that maybe women are not so hung up on the idea of a band or group as men, so women listeners are more evenly spread across pop, rock, jazz etc than men (and since prog rock is essentially a rock genre, it would account for fewer women in prog rock too).  But I guess people are more interested in flogging the same old stereotypes than considering an idea which may have some merit, at any rate more merit than said stereotypes.



Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 20:21
Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

Yeah, and Courtney Love was in a band. What difference does it make?
Courtney Love was into a lot of things...or was it a lot of things were in Courtney? She did name her band "Hole", and I  can't think of a more apt title.
 
Ummm....what were we talking about again?
 
Oh yeah, abrasive, like scabby. Like...Courtney.


-------------
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 20:26
Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

Yeah, and Courtney Love was in a band. What difference does it make?


I don't know what your point is, another misguided generalization like Twilight? If you asked Cobain fanboys, they'd say it made a  hell of a lot of a difference.


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 20:34
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

Yeah, and Courtney Love was in a band. What difference does it make?


I don't know what your point is, another misguided generalization like Twilight? If you asked Cobain fanboys, they'd say it made a  hell of a lot of a difference.

Since when do I sincerely make generalizations? Do you think I think every female novel is like Twilight? You think I think every woman or man is the same? You don't know very much about how much I know about psychology, sociology, culture, and milkshakes. 


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 23:02
Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

The topic is about PROGRESSIVE ROCK music...not jazz or opera. And to my point, opera is very emotional performances that pull at your heart.....I would expect women to enjoy opera rather than a prog rock concert. Jazz is lively and upbeat, you can dance to it even.....If you know my posts, you would know my wife is from New Orleans, jazz is in her blood, we've seen plenty of jazz artists in the French Quarter.
 
Because, to use your words, prog music is abrasive and agressive, the wonderful lyrics can get ignored in a lot of cases. But to us men, since we enjoy the music, we can listen to the lyrics and pull out the meanings quite easily.
 
So why are their no women music reviewers, reviewing prog rock albums?
 
I don't really listen to abrasive and aggressive prog music -- which bands are those precisely? My wife, like myself, enjoys a wide range of music. Our tastes differ in that she listens to classical music more often than I do, but I took her to a Jethro Tull concert when we were dating and she loved it. When Ian Anderson did a solo tour, she surprised me with tickets. She also bought a copy of the Rupi's Dance CD which she won't let me take out of her car.
 
All that being said, I thnk this whole patriarchal music business is a load of crap. We have plenty of Sandy Denny/Fairport and Annie Haslam/Renaissance CDs, but if she's in a rock mood, my wife will grab a Yes, Tull or Moody Blues CD. Or not, sometimes she listens to blues (all old black guys). She listens to whatever the hell she wants, just like I do. The only female singer I think she favors is Alison Kraus (who we saw with Robert Plant - great show by the way). She likes well composed, well sung and played music -- and I really don't think she gives a rat's hairy patoot what gender the musicians are, or whether she should feel inadequate because of some perceived male dominated music genre. The whole thought process is inane and misguided to say the least.
 
Wait a moment, she just home from work...
 
Yeah, so I asked her what she was listening to on her iPod. She answered Great Big Sea, The Waterboys and The Young Dubliners.
 
I asked her if she felt oppressed listening to male dominated Gaelic rock.
 
She answered, "Whatever."
 
 
 
I have no idea who those "abrasive and agressive" bands might be....those are the words of CPicard...ask him. I also do not listen to this type of music.


-------------


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 23:12
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Because, to use your words, prog music is abrasive and agressive, the wonderful lyrics can get ignored in a lot of cases. But to us men, since we enjoy the music, we can listen to the lyrics and pull out the meanings quite easily.
 
So why are their no women music reviewers, reviewing prog rock albums?


Outside prog circles, nobody considers prog, and especially classic prog, 'abrasive' and 'aggressive', they just dub it polite and pretentious, be they men or women.  I have seen women attend extreme metal concerts so I don't think the abrasiveness has anything to do with it. I don't know if you grew up in a family that listens to prog, because otherwise you'd be used to the idea that only a small minority likes prog, whether it's men or women and most people don't warm up to it.   Has nothing to do with 'inherent differences' between men and women. To reiterate my earlier point, 'we' assume that 'they' think differently, don't like this or can't do that and hence don't canonize female artists on merit the way we ought to, which reinforces the impression of it being a man's genre. But there are a lot of women who listen to rock-related music and lot of women making or performing it too. 
 
Please take that question to CPicard......I did not use those words.....You all are totally confused on this thread. I grew up listening to all types of music and still do. My wife and I have seen Iron Maiden 3x, Scorpions 2x, Judas Priest, Earth Wind & Fire 3x as well as Kenny G who she likes.......So her tastes vary quite much.
The question is, is Prog Rock-a man's genre?
I gave reasons why I think it is and why in general more women do not listen to prog.
 
Cheers!


-------------


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 08:52
Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:


Since when do I sincerely make generalizations? Do you think I think every female novel is like Twilight? You think I think every woman or man is the same? You don't know very much about how much I know about psychology, sociology, culture, and milkshakes. 


I do not know you and am not obliged to since this is an internet forum, so I can only respond to what you post.  Comparing Anne Rice to George Orwell, Carole King to Ian Anderson and now bringing up Courtney Love all sound like generalizations. If you did not intend to make generalizations, I don't know what you hoped to convey with it.


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 08:54
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Please take that question to CPicard......I did not use those words.....You all are totally confused on this thread. I grew up listening to all types of music and still do. My wife and I have seen Iron Maiden 3x, Scorpions 2x, Judas Priest, Earth Wind & Fire 3x as well as Kenny G who she likes.......So her tastes vary quite much.
The question is, is Prog Rock-a man's genre?
I gave reasons why I think it is and why in general more women do not listen to prog.
 
Cheers!


Actually you have. When you say, "to use your words it is abrasive and aggressive music", you are agreeing with him on that description. Confused But you sound genuinely badgered, so maybe you forgot that you had used those words.


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 09:35
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:


Since when do I sincerely make generalizations? Do you think I think every female novel is like Twilight? You think I think every woman or man is the same? You don't know very much about how much I know about psychology, sociology, culture, and milkshakes. 


I do not know you and am not obliged to since this is an internet forum, so I can only respond to what you post.  Comparing Anne Rice to George Orwell, Carole King to Ian Anderson and now bringing up Courtney Love all sound like generalizations. If you did not intend to make generalizations, I don't know what you hoped to convey with it.

Maybe I'm being facetious. 


Posted By: SaltyJon
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 09:51
At Penn State, a girl who was dating the guy who lived right around the corner liked just about everything she heard coming out of my door when she walked past.  That included everything from prog folk to RIO/Avant/Zeuhl to free jazz to Canterbury scene to eclectic prog, etc.  I think anyone can like prog, it's not exclusively a "man's genre."  Look at the ZART, Cleo's a woman and she seems to enjoy this kind of stuff. 

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Salty_Jon" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 10:16
^ True that its not exclusively a "man's genre". Like Logan states here:
 
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

My mother (like my father when he was alive, by he was very vocal in his disdain for rock and pop music) only listens to classical music by choice (she does quite like some jazz too).  I played her some Art Zoyd from Generations Sans Futur whilst she was in my car, and she said it was far too dissonant for her.  That said, she did enjoy a fair amount of U Totem's debut (I avoided some parts) and she did like Aranis.

My wife has said that the music I listen to goes on too long, is dull, and often sounds like soundtrack music, which would be fine if it was background music ina  film, but not to listen to.  I do like pop music that she likes, such as Abba (it's her favourite band, but I still know Abba better than her).  The only ones I can think of that she has liked in PA that I've played for her are Mellow Candle, Supertramp, and Alan Parsons Project (plus various songs by various artists such as as some PFM).

A complaint I've heard from various females is that the music I listen to is weird and not melodic.  I get the same weird complaint about music from males, but they don't complain about it not being melodic.  I don't know anyone in real life who shares my Prog Archives-type tastes in music  (some of it, sure, like King Crimson, but not the more avant-oriented music).
 
he too points out some reasons why women may not enjoy/understand progressive rock as much as men do, I like his post and was on the same lines as my thinking.
 
Prog rock takes time and patience.....My wife likes Rush and Genesis, but cannot sit on the sofa and listen to all of Hemispheres, Xanadu or Supper's Ready....and never listen to all 4 sides of The Lamb Lies Down.


-------------


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 10:46
^^^^ On the other hand, I knew one woman who was very knowledgable about prog at the time I was getting into it.  Knew a lot of Canterbury apart from the usual suspects, also LTE and all that.  And it's not true that men don't complain about its being weird. They do, they just may not call it that. They will say it's all trippy hipster trash or washing machine music, all things to indicate that they can't make head or tail of it and find it displeasing to their ears.  


Posted By: SaltyJon
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 10:50
You should have heard the complaints I heard guys on my floor say while passing my room at school...most of them revolved around the stuff I listened to "not being music."  LOL

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Salty_Jon" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 10:51
^^^ Exactly.


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 11:01
Originally posted by SaltyJon SaltyJon wrote:

You should have heard the complaints I heard guys on my floor say while passing my room at school...most of them revolved around the stuff I listened to "not being music."  LOL
 
I could care less what other men think of what I listen to, if they don't understand, its their problem........But keeping my wife happy is my problem.
LOL


-------------


Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 13:28
When I typed "It sounds abrasive and aggressive", I was talking about the tone of my response.


Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 21:26
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Because, to use your words, prog music is abrasive and agressive, the wonderful lyrics can get ignored in a lot of cases. But to us men, since we enjoy the music, we can listen to the lyrics and pull out the meanings quite easily.
 
So why are their no women music reviewers, reviewing prog rock albums?


Outside prog circles, nobody considers prog, and especially classic prog, 'abrasive' and 'aggressive', they just dub it polite and pretentious, be they men or women.  I have seen women attend extreme metal concerts so I don't think the abrasiveness has anything to do with it. I don't know if you grew up in a family that listens to prog, because otherwise you'd be used to the idea that only a small minority likes prog, whether it's men or women and most people don't warm up to it.   Has nothing to do with 'inherent differences' between men and women. To reiterate my earlier point, 'we' assume that 'they' think differently, don't like this or can't do that and hence don't canonize female artists on merit the way we ought to, which reinforces the impression of it being a man's genre. But there are a lot of women who listen to rock-related music and lot of women making or performing it too. 
 
Please take that question to CPicard......I did not use those words.....You all are totally confused on this thread. I grew up listening to all types of music and still do. My wife and I have seen Iron Maiden 3x, Scorpions 2x, Judas Priest, Earth Wind & Fire 3x as well as Kenny G who she likes.......So her tastes vary quite much.
The question is, is Prog Rock-a man's genre?
I gave reasons why I think it is and why in general more women do not listen to prog.
 
Cheers!
Hmmm...so your wife denigrates progressive music  but enjoys The Scorpions? Ummm...pardon my laughing out loud about her (and your) misguided attempts at foisting this entire "patriarchal music" hogwash on the rest of us...
 
 
Was she voicing her indignance at the band while they were on stage? Did she carry a protest sign? What a joke.


-------------
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 06:04
...anyway, Lozlan had said something to the effect earlier that the differences between men and women are socio-cultural. I'd disagree with that and say that even in music, there are some biological differences. The problem is really more that since music was dominated by men for so long, they have an unreasonable expectation that women should do everything the way the man do it in music, else it's not good. That wall too is gradually being broken down. Anyway, with regard to singing, I do think soprano voices have more facility in melodious and soft singing than tenor types.  Of course, you can always find tenors who sing much better than some sopranos too, so this is just a general observation and also based more on sopranos and tenors in rock/pop and not classical music.  Sopranos tend to be women so there's a biological difference for you. In fact, there's practically nothing you can do about the voice type you are born with and it will cast you into a different niche of singing.  Contralto females are more suitable for jazz singing and for folk/classical, soprano works well. Once again, capable singers break these barriers too but they do have a bearing on what kind of singing you tend more towards. Women are also better at expressing reticence and ambivalence in singing. I think this is partly a function of the voice type and partly a cultural difference. 

In short, there will be some inherent differences between men and women because, well, they can and we can't Tongue but because society was male dominated these differences were for a long time projected as proof of women's inferiority to men, which is needless to say a sexist stance. 


Posted By: Lozlan
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 11:02
http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Where_are_the_women_bloggers%3F" rel="nofollow - http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Where_are_the_women_bloggers%3F

An entry that's relevant. Please read.


-------------
Certified Obscure Prog Fart.

http://scottjcouturier.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow - The Loose Palace of Exile - My first novel, The Mask of Tamrel, now available on Amazon and Kindle


Posted By: Lozlan
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 11:07
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

...anyway, Lozlan had said something to the effect earlier that the differences between men and women are socio-cultural. I'd disagree with that and say that even in music, there are some biological differences. The problem is really more that since music was dominated by men for so long, they have an unreasonable expectation that women should do everything the way the man do it in music, else it's not good. That wall too is gradually being broken down. Anyway, with regard to singing, I do think soprano voices have more facility in melodious and soft singing than tenor types.  Of course, you can always find tenors who sing much better than some sopranos too, so this is just a general observation and also based more on sopranos and tenors in rock/pop and not classical music.  Sopranos tend to be women so there's a biological difference for you. In fact, there's practically nothing you can do about the voice type you are born with and it will cast you into a different niche of singing.  Contralto females are more suitable for jazz singing and for folk/classical, soprano works well. Once again, capable singers break these barriers too but they do have a bearing on what kind of singing you tend more towards. Women are also better at expressing reticence and ambivalence in singing. I think this is partly a function of the voice type and partly a cultural difference. 

In short, there will be some inherent differences between men and women because, well, they can and we can't Tongue but because society was male dominated these differences were for a long time projected as proof of women's inferiority to men, which is needless to say a sexist stance. 


I really don't understand why evolution and biological imperatives would influence the types of music a person enjoys. Are you making some argument that women are more soft, cuddly, and caring (mothering instinct or what have you), and therefore like music that is sappy and emotional? I really don't buy that the type of voice an individual has influences their musical preference...I like Captain Beefheart but I certainly don't have a five-octave growling range capable of shattering cinderblocks.

Also, since I know a fair number of women who enjoy prog, are they some sort of genetic mistake? Let's get specific here.


-------------
Certified Obscure Prog Fart.

http://scottjcouturier.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow - The Loose Palace of Exile - My first novel, The Mask of Tamrel, now available on Amazon and Kindle


Posted By: Lozlan
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 11:08
Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

I'm lost as to what your point was and I have this gut feeling that your feminist wife has gotten to your head a bit.


Fnerk.


-------------
Certified Obscure Prog Fart.

http://scottjcouturier.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow - The Loose Palace of Exile - My first novel, The Mask of Tamrel, now available on Amazon and Kindle


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 11:17
There is no such thing as a genetic 'mistake'. Everything we do is circumstantial, genetic, environmental, conditioned, and attributed to an infinite web of faceted circumstances that have constructed the situations we're in. Of course there are genetic differences - that's scientific. Does that mean ALL women and men think in exactly the same ways? Reality doesn't generalize. Fact is fact. The goal of scientific research is to explain, not typify. Everything you like and do can be rationally explained by applying enough attention to the individual strands that have coalesced together to construct your existence. 

I want a blowjob.


Posted By: TheGazzardian
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 11:19
Raff hates this stereotype. However it seems like less of a concern as she brings up in her blog entry...
Originally posted by Raff's blog Raff's blog wrote:

Before I wrap up this very long and detailed review, I would like to acknowledge the wealth of female musical talent seen on stage over the weekend. The ladies are really making headway into the progressive world, ad this is also borne out by the increasing number of women in the audience. Next time the old, worn out cliché of “girls don’t listen to prog” comes up, the facts will prove it wrong.
( http://progmistress.wordpress.com/2011/05/26/live-review-rosfest-2011-prog-is-a-battlefield/" rel="nofollow - http://progmistress.wordpress.com/2011/05/26/live-review-rosfest-2011-prog-is-a-battlefield/ )
(I hope she doesn't mind me posting this on her behalf, it just seemed relevant to the conversation)


Posted By: Lozlan
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 11:27
Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

There is no such thing as a genetic 'mistake'. Everything we do is circumstantial, genetic, environmental, conditioned, and attributed to an infinite web of faceted circumstances that have constructed the situations we're in. Of course there are genetic differences - that's scientific. Does that mean ALL women and men think in exactly the same ways? Reality doesn't generalize. Fact is fact. The goal of scientific research is to explain, not typify. Everything you like and do can be rationally explained by applying enough attention to the individual strands that have coalesced together to construct your existence. 

I want a blowjob.


Ah! Tell that to my vestigial tail. Although it does give me amazing balance.

I agree with your final statement, but strongly disagree with your overall conceptualization. I was planning on spending a little time poking your previous post about racism and survivalism with a stick, but it was crammed full of delicious dudely posturing and I got bored. Maybe I'll go back later today, even if the prospect thrills me about as much as stabbing myself in the eye with a thumbtack coated in lemon juice. That's the problem with these debates: they are never actual debates.

As for the blowjob, have a few ribs removed.




-------------
Certified Obscure Prog Fart.

http://scottjcouturier.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow - The Loose Palace of Exile - My first novel, The Mask of Tamrel, now available on Amazon and Kindle


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 11:31
Originally posted by Lozlan Lozlan wrote:

Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

There is no such thing as a genetic 'mistake'. Everything we do is circumstantial, genetic, environmental, conditioned, and attributed to an infinite web of faceted circumstances that have constructed the situations we're in. Of course there are genetic differences - that's scientific. Does that mean ALL women and men think in exactly the same ways? Reality doesn't generalize. Fact is fact. The goal of scientific research is to explain, not typify. Everything you like and do can be rationally explained by applying enough attention to the individual strands that have coalesced together to construct your existence. 

I want a blowjob.


Ah! Tell that to my vestigial tail. Although it does give me amazing balance.

I agree with your final statement, but strongly disagree with your overall conceptualization. I was planning on spending a little time poking your previous post about racism and survivalism with a stick, but it was crammed full of delicious dudely posturing and I got bored. Maybe I'll go back later today, even if the prospect thrills me about as much as stabbing myself in the eye with a thumbtack coated in lemon juice. That's the problem with these debates: they are never actual debates.

As for the blowjob, have a few ribs removed.



Poke away. I'm not here to prove a point. I'm not here to be right, either. This doesn't seem to be a right or wrong situation. Either women are genetically predisposed to behaviors that differ from men, or they aren't. It's not a matter of opinion. The existence of the sun doesn't change if you start or stop believing in it - all it changes is your possible reaction to it.


Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 20:35
But, at the end, the truth is that your "progressive rock scene" is a dead scene on the modern stage of music: for many, progressive rock died with the arrival of Punk and New Wave. Your music died in 1976 and no one cared about the burial.
But you feel the need to claim your love for a genre that just a minority cares about: most of you are WASP, middle-class young men, you worship Rush, you fancy heroic-fantasy, badly written "SF", you still have your D&D books, you think you are an elite or a "persecuted minority" for loving this genre... No wonder no one wants to join your club.

Over the couple of years I spend on this forum, I've seen:
 - debates about the superiority of progressive rock upon other musical genres;
 - a thousand stupid, needless polls about "Make your dream band", "Who's the best singer", "Yes, Genesis or Rush?" (hello, Gandalff, too much free time?)
- Christian propaganda Vs. the most stupid atheist in the world (hello, Mike, need fibers?)
- Libertarian propaganda (hello, social darwinism)
- aginor destroying English linguage;
- Henry Plainview - and I just need to type this sole name to feel disturbed;
- the inability to understand that AVANT-GARDE IS NOT A f**kING GENRE, MORONS! Go read a dictionary!
- the GURLS (PA needs more women).

Oh, yeah, women.
The girls. The chicks, the "shes".
They have short attention spans. They only care for the melodies. They are irrational. They can't understand the superiority of progressive rock. They can't drum.
And, now, biological hypothesis, handled by semi-savant monkeys launched on internet, fed from Wikipedia, without anyone to punch them in the face while they obviously need it.

I have enough of this zoo. This hell.
I can't stay on this forum without having bursts of irritation: I stopped lurking on the Christian/Agnostic threads, the Libertarian thread - and even most of the musical threads. But it's not enough. I have to get the hell out of here.

Women don't care about your f**king progressive rock music, because men don't care about it.
No one cares about it.
No one cares about YOU.




Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 20:40
Originally posted by CPicard CPicard wrote:

But, at the end, the truth is that your "progressive rock scene" is a dead scene on the modern stage of music: for many, progressive rock died with the arrival of Punk and New Wave. Your music died in 1976 and no one cared about the burial.
But you feel the need to claim your love for a genre that just a minority cares about: most of you are WASP, middle-class young men, you worship Rush, you fancy heroic-fantasy, badly written "SF", you still have your D&D books, you think you are an elite or a "persecuted minority" for loving this genre... No wonder no one wants to join your club.

Over the couple of years I spend on this forum, I've seen:
 - debates about the superiority of progressive rock upon other musical genres;
 - a thousand stupid, needless polls about "Make your dream band", "Who's the best singer", "Yes, Genesis or Rush?" (hello, Gandalff, too much free time?)
- Christian propaganda Vs. the most stupid atheist in the world (hello, Mike, need fibers?)
- Libertarian propaganda (hello, social darwinism)
- aginor destroying English linguage;
- Henry Plainview - and I just need to type this sole name to feel disturbed;
- the inability to understand that AVANT-GARDE IS NOT A f**kING GENRE, MORONS! Go read a dictionary!
- the GURLS (PA needs more women).

Oh, yeah, women.
The girls. The chicks, the "shes".
They have short attention spans. They only care for the melodies. They are irrational. They can't understand the superiority of progressive rock. They can't drum.
And, now, biological hypothesis, handled by semi-savant monkeys launched on internet, fed from Wikipedia, without anyone to punch them in the face while they obviously need it.

I have enough of this zoo. This hell.
I can't stay on this forum without having bursts of irritation: I stopped lurking on the Christian/Agnostic threads, the Libertarian thread - and even most of the musical threads. But it's not enough. I have to get the hell out of here.

Women don't care about your f**king progressive rock music, because men don't care about it.
No one cares about it.
No one cares about YOU.




This may very well be the greatest post to grace the ProgArchives.


Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 20:43
Wow


Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 21:01
Originally posted by TheGazzardian TheGazzardian wrote:

Raff hates this stereotype. However it seems like less of a concern as she brings up in her blog entry...
Originally posted by Raff's blog Raff's blog wrote:

Before I wrap up this very long and detailed review, I would like to acknowledge the wealth of female musical talent seen on stage over the weekend. The ladies are really making headway into the progressive world, ad this is also borne out by the increasing number of women in the audience. Next time the old, worn out cliché of “girls don’t listen to prog” comes up, the facts will prove it wrong.
( http://progmistress.wordpress.com/2011/05/26/live-review-rosfest-2011-prog-is-a-battlefield/" rel="nofollow - http://progmistress.wordpress.com/2011/05/26/live-review-rosfest-2011-prog-is-a-battlefield/ )
(I hope she doesn't mind me posting this on her behalf, it just seemed relevant to the conversation)


I don't think she'd mind, and it's an impressive review, I've found writing-up concerts to be uniquely challenging




Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 21:10
Originally posted by CPicard CPicard wrote:

But, at the end, the truth is that your "progressive rock scene" is a dead scene on the modern stage of music: for many, progressive rock died with the arrival of Punk and New Wave. Your music died in 1976 and no one cared about the burial.
But you feel the need to claim your love for a genre that just a minority cares about: most of you are WASP, middle-class young men, you worship Rush, you fancy heroic-fantasy, badly written "SF", you still have your D&D books, you think you are an elite or a "persecuted minority" for loving this genre... No wonder no one wants to join your club.

Over the couple of years I spend on this forum, I've seen:
 - debates about the superiority of progressive rock upon other musical genres;
 - a thousand stupid, needless polls about "Make your dream band", "Who's the best singer", "Yes, Genesis or Rush?" (hello, Gandalff, too much free time?)
- Christian propaganda Vs. the most stupid atheist in the world (hello, Mike, need fibers?)
- Libertarian propaganda (hello, social darwinism)
- aginor destroying English linguage;
- Henry Plainview - and I just need to type this sole name to feel disturbed;
- the inability to understand that AVANT-GARDE IS NOT A f**kING GENRE, MORONS! Go read a dictionary!
- the GURLS (PA needs more women).

Oh, yeah, women.
The girls. The chicks, the "shes".
They have short attention spans. They only care for the melodies. They are irrational. They can't understand the superiority of progressive rock. They can't drum.
And, now, biological hypothesis, handled by semi-savant monkeys launched on internet, fed from Wikipedia, without anyone to punch them in the face while they obviously need it.

I have enough of this zoo. This hell.
I can't stay on this forum without having bursts of irritation: I stopped lurking on the Christian/Agnostic threads, the Libertarian thread - and even most of the musical threads. But it's not enough. I have to get the hell out of here.

Women don't care about your f**king progressive rock music, because men don't care about it.
No one cares about it.
No one cares about YOU.


 
Wait...It took you 3 years and over 4700 posts to figure out that you wasted and immense amount of time here better spent posting inanities on some other forum better suited to your stunning intellect and room-crowding ego? That says more about your utter fatuousness than anything else. Rather than insulting everyone and the kitchen sink, take a long look in the mirror, and then hit yourself upside the head with a baseball bat -- hard enough to either give you some common sense or to put yourself in a coma. Either would be fine.


-------------
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 21:19
And here I thought my requests for fellatio were going to be the straws that broke the camel's banhammer and got this thread shut down. Actually, I thought the inherent sexism in the thread's bloodstream would've gotten it locked ages ago. And here it's all gonna come crashing down because of what practically constitutes a disgruntled observing pedestrian.


Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 21:31
Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

And here I thought my requests for fellatio were going to be the straws that broke the camel's banhammer and got this thread shut down. Actually, I thought the inherent sexism in the thread's bloodstream would've gotten it locked ages ago. And here it's all gonna come crashing down because of what practically constitutes a disgruntled observing pedestrian.
 
Having frequented many forums since the stone age of the Internet, I always find it amusing when a poster feels it necessary to make a "grand exit" . As if anyone cares. Just leave -- and shut the front door.


-------------
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...


Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: May 28 2011 at 10:38
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_-858AdxFE" rel="nofollow - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_-858AdxFE
HeadbangerSax manViolinHead on wallLOL
 
And that's all I want to say. Thank you.
 


-------------
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.


Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: May 28 2011 at 11:18
@ The Dark Elf
 
You know he was trolling right?
 
And room-crowding ego... Who else has that...?


-------------
http://blindpoetrecords.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: May 28 2011 at 11:20
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bpmxc10odA" rel="nofollow">Headbangerhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bpmxc10odA
Put this on endless play. It will straighten you all out.

-------------
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.


Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: May 28 2011 at 13:26
Originally posted by The Truth The Truth wrote:

@ The Dark Elf
 
You know he was trolling right?
 
And room-crowding ego... Who else has that...?
 
I am uninterested in whether or not he was playing a game. If he was in fact trolling, then I suppose one should never take his posts seriously.
 
As far as "room-crowding egos", mine might fit snuggly through a door, but I won't knock the chip dip off a table on the far side of the room. Wink


-------------
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...


Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 28 2011 at 13:32
Don't touch my buffalo ranch sauce; I swear to dog I'll tear this house down to its threaded foundations.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk