Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
Forum Description: Discuss specific prog bands and their members or a specific sub-genre
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=78098 Printed Date: November 25 2024 at 01:52 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Your opinion on Prog MetalPosted By: Purple_Floyd
Subject: Your opinion on Prog Metal
Date Posted: May 06 2011 at 17:41
I didn't know where to post this topic, considering it's more about progressive metal than anything else.
I've always been a big metal fan. It's also the sub-genre that introduced me to music in general, and to prog later. Still today, even if I'm listening to a lot more of rock-prog, I still have a inclination towards well written metal pieces, like some Dream Theater epics, etc. Though, I've never believed that it was in any way a superior sub-change, just as respectable as any kind of genres (Except for commercial pop ;p).
Sadly, two of my friends doesn't have the same opinions as me. One of them listen to a lot of jazz/pop/retro (He's an hipster, after all) and the other listen exclusively to classical music.
Their general consensus is that, while metal music can be melodic, it's without doubt emotionless, violent, and overall unimpressive mess that tries to put as many notes as possible in their songs.
I blieve their description is deeply inaccurate, considering the many highly emotional, complex (and sometimes calm!) albums and songs made by artists like Pain of Salvation, Opeth, Maudlin of the Well, Fates Warning, Ayreon, Riverside or, once again, Dream Theater.
I would love to hear some opinions from people on PA around metal, especially metal prog, whether you like it or not. I believe I can count on the community to be a lot more open-minded then my pals.
Replies: Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: May 06 2011 at 17:44
1) Listening to jazz doesn't make somebody a hipster.
2) Most prog metal is pretty bad, with the exception of course of maudlin.
3) Post-metal is pretty contradictory to their beliefs.
4) You shouldn't force your musical tastes on others anyway, especially not if you are a fan of Dream Theater.
Posted By: Prog Geo
Date Posted: May 06 2011 at 17:46
Look at my signature and at my avatar! So, now you know which is my favorite band and my favorite kind of music.
------------- Sonorous Meal show every Sunday at 20:00 (greek time) on http://www.justincaseradio.com
Posted By: jsem
Date Posted: May 06 2011 at 17:48
Definitely give them a healthy dose of post-metal.
Or for the classical guy, a ton of cheesy Yngwie-ish music.. lol *trollface.jpg*
Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: May 06 2011 at 18:02
Frankly... Don't waste your time trying to convince people to listen to whatever music you're into - or ask your friends to lend you some of their favorite records.
Posted By: Purple_Floyd
Date Posted: May 06 2011 at 18:06
Triceratopsoil wrote:
1) Listening to jazz doesn't make somebody a hipster.
He's dressing like my grand father, is pretty smug and drinking PBR. He's definitely hipster ;p
Triceratopsoil wrote:
2) Most prog metal is pretty bad, with the exception of course of maudlin.
Why? Could you develop a little more?
Triceratopsoil wrote:
3) Post-metal is pretty contradictory to their beliefs.
I want to look at it eventually. I have a few post-rock bands in my library that I like a lot.
Triceratopsoil wrote:
4) You shouldn't force your musical tastes on others anyway, especially not if you are a fan of Dream Theater.
I'm not forcing my tastes on them. I have absolutely no problem with classic and jazz, I respect these genres. I don't even care what they listen to, I'm not looking for trouble or anything. Debates often rise because they are judging and bashing my tastes out of nowhere.
Posted By: Purple_Floyd
Date Posted: May 06 2011 at 18:08
CPicard wrote:
Frankly... Don't waste your time trying to convince people to listen to whatever music you're into - or ask your friends to lend you some of their favorite records.
That's not what I'm trying to. I'm just curious to hear opinions from people around here.
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: May 06 2011 at 18:09
At which point did the OP say he was trying to change peoples minds? He's just saying he disagrees with their viewpoints.
Anyway, I love progressive metal in most of its forms, though admitedly the traditional style has been rather stagnant for much of the last 10 years, there's lots of stuff from all three of PA's sub genres that I listen to on a regular bassis.
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: May 06 2011 at 18:23
Purple_Floyd wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
1) Listening to jazz doesn't make somebody a hipster.
He's dressing like my grand father, is pretty smug and drinking PBR. He's definitely hipster ;p
Okay, but you can say he's a hipster without using jazz music as a symptom :P
Purple_Floyd wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
2) Most prog metal is pretty bad, with the exception of course of maudlin.
Why? Could you develop a little more?
I just find it - in general - corny, cliched, and tasteless.
Purple_Floyd wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
4) You shouldn't force your musical tastes on others anyway, especially not if you are a fan of Dream Theater.
I'm not forcing my tastes on them. I have absolutely no problem with classic and jazz, I respect these genres. I don't even care what they listen to, I'm not looking for trouble or anything. Debates often rise because they are judging and bashing my tastes out of nowhere.
In that case, just punch them in the face.
Posted By: Dellinger
Date Posted: May 06 2011 at 21:41
I do like metal pretty much, including prog metal, ofcourse. I can find plenty of emotion in some songs, and melody too. And some songs are really cool even if they are not particularly emotional. I for one would show Space Dye Vest to anyone who says that metal in an emotionless genre, and there are many other heavier songs that also show pretty much emotion.
Posted By: Harry Hood
Date Posted: May 06 2011 at 21:52
Metal can be very bad. But when it's good, it's really damn good.
Try to get your Jazz Hipster friend into Death. They're basically a jazz band that uses metal aesthetics when you get to their later albums.
Also does your hipster friend like The Mountain Goats? If not get him into them. They're an "indie-folk" group, but death and black metal are among their biggest influences.
-------------
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 06 2011 at 22:46
My favorite music has been, since I was a child, classical music (see signature). But I've always loved rock and specially metal. Though I've grown more distant of current tendencies, my favorite rock band is a metal band (DT) and I have quite most of my top 10 bands being metal. In my collection I have room for death metal, black metal, a d lots of progressie metal (plus other metal genres). I don't see nothing exclusive here. I don't always want the complexity of a symphony or the scope of a sacred work by Bach. Sometimes I want the strength, energy of DT, sometimes the sheer evil of Gorgoroth, sometimes the energy of Maiden.
And metal is SO not emotionless. It can be many things, but emotionless
-------------
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 07 2011 at 03:45
Purple_Floyd wrote:
I didn't know where to post this topic, considering it's more about progressive metal than anything else.
I've always been a big metal fan. It's also the sub-genre that introduced me to music in general, and to prog later. Still today, even if I'm listening to a lot more of rock-prog, I still have a inclination towards well written metal pieces, like some Dream Theater epics, etc. Though, I've never believed that it was in any way a superior sub-change, just as respectable as any kind of genres (Except for commercial pop ;p).
Sadly, two of my friends doesn't have the same opinions as me. One of them listen to a lot of jazz/pop/retro (He's an hipster, after all) and the other listen exclusively to classical music.
Their general consensus is that, while metal music can be melodic, it's without doubt emotionless, violent, and overall unimpressive mess that tries to put as many notes as possible in their songs.
I blieve their description is deeply inaccurate, considering the many highly emotional, complex (and sometimes calm!) albums and songs made by artists like Pain of Salvation, Opeth, Maudlin of the Well, Fates Warning, Ayreon, Riverside or, once again, Dream Theater.
I would love to hear some opinions from people on PA around metal, especially metal prog, whether you like it or not. I believe I can count on the community to be a lot more open-minded then my pals.
These things depend on every listener's prism. Jampa, a member of this website, is a big metal fan and doesn't like jazz because it sounds lacking in energy to him. There are always two sides of the coin. Though The T likes both classical and metal, I would not be surprised that people heavily into jazz and classical don't like metal. It is not lacking in emotion in the objective sense but it's not as subtle as those two forms of music. How much of subtlety is desirable and how much of energy and plain rock and roll a**-kicking heaviness is all a matter of taste. I don't think it is possible to make people come around to polar opposite perspectives as a general rule. Also, metalheads have the habit of saying extremely ignorant things about non metal music, in my experience. Listeners of any genre go around with some or other strong prejudices but metalheads have that "don't give a f***" attitude and are more outspoken about it. I have seen metalheads dub anything that's melodic as pop sellout or 'safe', which is plainly ignorant. Possibly, your friends have had bad experiences with metal listeners and are reacting more to that and dislike the music more on account of the fanbase. Not too fair on the music but a common tendency and nothing can be done about.
With that said, I do have a problem with pacing in prog metal. It's not that there are too many notes but there are not enough pauses or moments of impasse or slowing down to effectively build and articulate musical drama. It is generally a bit breathless. I find it easier to listen to prog metal on a song by song basis rather than a whole album because a whole album becomes a fatiguing affair. On the other hand, bands which attempt to pace it evenly get too predictable and too slow. It also seems to be tougher to modulate heavy distorted riffs with the same tones as you could with chord progressions played on maybe a keyboard. So things either happen too fast or too slowly. You have to really like the adrenalin rush of locked in, heavy metal playing to dig prog metal.
Another point is, prog rock always had a metal perspective within a larger umbrella of elements and influences. The track Red of KC or the last two minutes of Return of the Giant Hogweed, the riffs of Schizoid are just a few examples. So, constructing prog entirely around a metal perspective for album lengths seems a bit limiting to me...why not explore other dimensions of rock music too overall, why just metal?
In short, as a metal fan, I will always like some prog metal bands and their albums but not as much as prog classics like Red, SEBTP, DSOTM, CTTE and several others. It is, needless to say, close minded to dismiss all prog metal music as worthless because a lot of it is worthy and can give a lot of enjoyment to the listener but there are also some aspects of it that I am not completely satisfied with.
Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: May 07 2011 at 04:05
yeah it is strange and funny how those prog big 7 in their search for sounds and expressions, dipped into metal-like passages that arent lacking the intencity of todays metal., Apocalypse in 9/8 is as intence and heavy as anything Opeth (without the growl), im not saying it is metal, (or am I saying it is very close, frightningly close to metal), even when they did not think " hmm lets make this meta" it just went heavy becouse the song acquired something heavy and intence, the heavy section on Dancing in th Moonlit Knight is to me proto-power metal riff, with horse riding riffs, and triol-runs, CInema Show is as close to Iron Maidon, Genesis ever came (outdating IM by 9 years horse gallopping guitar and almost blast beat by Phil, or some heavy drumming)
-------------
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 07 2011 at 04:11
More than Cinema Show, it's the solos on Musical Box that evoke Iron Maiden heavily for me. Yeah, Dancing too. Gets so heavy and then the finish is so delicate, as if like a touch-me-not. I also don't find most prog metal drummers I have heard to be as expressive as Collins was on say that track, he was brilliant on the heavy sections of Dancing. That again is a matter of taste, but yes, prog rock bands tried to cover a wide spectrum and in the process, incorporated elements of metal too in their music.
Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: May 07 2011 at 04:13
rogerthat wrote:
More than Cinema Show, it's the solos on Musical Box that evoke Iron Maiden heavily for me. Yeah, Dancing too. Gets so heavy and then the finish is so delicate, as if like a touch-me-not. I also don't find most prog metal drummers I have heard to be as expressive as Collins was on say that track, he was brilliant on the heavy sections of Dancing. That again is a matter of taste, but yes, prog rock bands tried to cover a wide spectrum and in the process, incorporated elements of metal too in their music.
I actualy meant Musical Box , but my head is fooling me
-------------
Posted By: Valentino
Date Posted: May 07 2011 at 04:32
I listened to some BTBAM and the Number Twelve Looks Like You in my sophomore year in high school. I've tried, but haven't gotten into anything else since.
Posted By: Green Shield Stamp
Date Posted: May 07 2011 at 05:15
Purple_Floyd wrote:
I didn't know where to post this topic, considering it's more about progressive metal than anything else.
I've always been a big metal fan. It's also the sub-genre that introduced me to music in general, and to prog later. Still today, even if I'm listening to a lot more of rock-prog, I still have a inclination towards well written metal pieces, like some Dream Theater epics, etc. Though, I've never believed that it was in any way a superior sub-change, just as respectable as any kind of genres (Except for commercial pop ;p).
Sadly, two of my friends doesn't have the same opinions as me. One of them listen to a lot of jazz/pop/retro (He's an hipster, after all) and the other listen exclusively to classical music.
Their general consensus is that, while metal music can be melodic, it's without doubt emotionless, violent, and overall unimpressive mess that tries to put as many notes as possible in their songs.
I blieve their description is deeply inaccurate, considering the many highly emotional, complex (and sometimes calm!) albums and songs made by artists like Pain of Salvation, Opeth, Maudlin of the Well, Fates Warning, Ayreon, Riverside or, once again, Dream Theater.
I would love to hear some opinions from people on PA around metal, especially metal prog, whether you like it or not. I believe I can count on the community to be a lot more open-minded then my pals.
I'm kinda with your friends on this one. I often think (with only the odd exception) that Prog Metal is an oxymoron. The music is often so formulaic that it runs counter to the essence progressiveness. I'm not averse to metal; I just think the added 'prog' tag creates a misnomer. As another contributor wittily puts it : 'a pig painted gold is still a pig'.
------------- Haiku
Writing a poem
With seventeen syllables
Is very diffic....
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 07 2011 at 05:40
Prog music is a very broad church...
------------- What?
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 07 2011 at 06:34
Green Shield Stamp wrote:
I'm kinda with your friends on this one. I often think (with only the odd exception) that Prog Metal is an oxymoron. The music is often so formulaic that it runs counter to the essence progressiveness. I'm not averse to metal; I just think the added 'prog' tag creates a misnomer. As another contributor wittily puts it : 'a pig painted gold is still a pig'.
It is very much possible to be progressive in a metal context as the prog rock bands themselves showed back in the day. But the problem is, a lot of prog metal comes with the baggage that metal is all over the top, lofty, pretentious nonsense and prog metal is the intellectual, studied alternative. Except, here I am going to sound like a punkhead and say I don't really need the intellectual alternative because I love the uninhibited release of energy and aggression that goes with metal. It is not very out there musically, at least not any more, but always fun to listen to. It is the compromise that prog metal tries to strike that makes me qualify my praise for them. If you want to be challenging and daring, go the whole hog and let go of distortion every now and then. Trying to marry heaviness with progressiveness is not something that can really be stretched out over several albums as a formula.
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 07 2011 at 12:15
Right now I'm enjoying Karl Richter's 1958 version of Bach's Matthaus Passion. Best non-hip version ever. Just yesterday I was enjoying some real black black metal. It has a lot to do with my mood and what I'm doing. With classical music I definitely always LISTEN, I never do anything else but listen. With metal, I can be doing other stuff. Metal fills a space in my musical mind and it has been like that since I discovered it when I was around 16. My relation with classical goes way back so you can't say I like metal because it was the first type of music I listened to.
Jazz is not my cup of tea though, with some exceptions (Brubeck )
-------------
Posted By: Green Shield Stamp
Date Posted: May 07 2011 at 15:18
Dean wrote:
Prog music is a very broad church...
I agree with you completely!
However, I suspect that this is a (not so) subtle sniping remark about a comment I made in a different thread.
But please let me clarify. The title of the thread is Your opinion on Prog Metal.
The points I give in my posting are completely on-topic. They are my opinion - not objective universal truths. Yes Prog does and should embrace a very wide range of musical styles (and thank God for that). Prog Metal is one of my least favourite prog genres. I state this as a personal opinion and was invited to do so by the creator of this thread.
A broad church should allow for a broad range of opinions; please allow me mine.
------------- Haiku
Writing a poem
With seventeen syllables
Is very diffic....
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 07 2011 at 16:58
Green Shield Stamp wrote:
Dean wrote:
Prog music is a very broad church...
I agree with you completely!
However, I suspect that this is a (not so) subtle sniping remark about a comment I made in a different thread.
But please let me clarify. The title of the thread is Your opinion on Prog Metal.
The points I give in my posting are completely on-topic. They are my opinion - not objective universal truths. Yes Prog does and should embrace a very wide range of musical styles (and thank God for that). Prog Metal is one of my least favourite prog genres. I state this as a personal opinion and was invited to do so by the creator of this thread.
A broad church should allow for a broad range of opinions; please allow me mine.
Sorry. Cheap shot easily taken, but in response to the 'a pig painted gold is still a pig' comment I felt it justified.
However, I have made no comment regarding your right to make comment or voice your personal opinion here or anywhere else - you are free to equate Metal with a pig, they are both much maligned animals.
------------- What?
Posted By: esky
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 10:37
I'm turned off by the word "metal" in the name. And what could be more metal than the title track from Crimso's Red?
Posted By: Repner
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 15:21
I think prog metal got a bad rap in the early 2000's for being full of "Dream Theater rip offs". Seems to have changed with bands like Opeth and Porcupine Tree gaining popularity.
My opinion? I love prog metal. For me it was a gateway to checking out more prog styles as well. I'll always be a huge metal fan as well as prog
-------------
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 15:30
Metal and prog are my two favorite genres of music. However, I find that crossing them with each other can often yield non-stellar results.
Posted By: Bonnek
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 15:40
I have a strange relation with metal (and it's prog subsidiaries) I would say that I'm disinterested in 80-90% of it, but the remaining 10% can hit me like nothing else (except for Tangerine Dream and Floyd of course )
Posted By: zravkapt
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 16:49
I must be one of those few prog fans who prefer non-prog metal to prog metal. I'll take Judas Priest and Slayer over Dream Theater or Opeth anyday. Most metal-oriented prog is 75% metal, 25% prog to my ears. I'm not much for most of "Progressive Metal" (as a sub here), but there is some "Tech/Extreme" and "Post/Experimental" I enjoy very much.
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 18:32
I used to worship at the altars of Dream Theater, Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, Dio, Rainbow, Iced Earth, Blind Guardian, and all sorts of metal groups. Metal was my favorite genre. Now it has become one of my least favorites. When it comes to progressive metal, it depends. Are they following the ideas behind Devin Townsend, maudlin of the Well, Pain of Salvation, Ayreon, Queensryche (sometimes), or Riverside? Then I love it. But are they following the ideas behind Dream Theater? Then forget it. I'm sick of it, entirely. I don't want anything to do with it anymore.
Posted By: Nathaniel607
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 18:37
I love prog metal! I think it gets way too much shtick with people just bashing it for no easily discernible reason...
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Nathaniel607" rel="nofollow - My Last FM Profile
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 19:17
Nathaniel607 wrote:
I love prog metal! I think it gets way too much shtick with people just bashing it for no easily discernible reason...
Because the trillions of Dream Theater knock-offs pollute the air, because the other instruments usually take a backseat to the electric guitar and vocalist, because the entire metal paradigm is one that eschews half the human emotional palette, because they tend to swarm to metal due to their lack of abilities when it comes to writing eminently memorable melodies, because half the genre is built around impressing rather than affecting or impacting, because most metal has nothing to do with subtlety, because distortion can mask inferior playing abilities, because people involved with it tend to care more about image and style rather than sheer musical qualities, because the genre lacks a distinct edge for experimentation, because it's typically so damn derivative and unoriginal. Just look at those trillions upon trillions of Iron Maiden albums and Iron Maiden ripoffs releasing the same long, droning, unoriginal tripe year after year, because it propagates this new silly loudness war, because it's often based only on wh can play faster or louder or whatever, because people associated with the genre seem to typically take flash over substance, because it tends to be lyrically banal and adolescent.
There's a nice list of easily discernible reasons. Note: none of these are intended to be generalizations. This also isn't directed toward post metal, or bands such as Pain of Salvation or Devin Townsend. This list doesn't regard ALL prog metal, just the majority, so don't jump with your inane defenses thinking I've gone and done something ugly and erroneous to deface your oh-so-holy genre and forgotten X such and such group or Y such and such group that totally obliterates my preconceived notions of the genre. It don't work like that, Mack. And remember, this is coming from a guy who used to utterly worship heavy metal, progressive or otherwise.
Posted By: Horizons
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 19:23
Has to sound fresh and unique.
Or else i get bored really quickly.
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:12
zravkapt wrote:
I must be one of those few prog fans who prefer non-prog metal to prog metal. I'll take Judas Priest and Slayer over Dream Theater or Opeth anyday. Most metal-oriented prog is 75% metal, 25% prog to my ears. I'm not much for most of "Progressive Metal" (as a sub here), but there is some "Tech/Extreme" and "Post/Experimental" I enjoy very much.
I am pretty much like that. Not Slayer maybe but generally, that's how it is for me. Black Sabbath is my all time favourite metal band and next up would surely be Judas Priest.
Posted By: dr prog
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:32
I'm not a fan of metal at all. Anything that has to be heavier than Heavy rock is pointless and done because of a fad imo. Btw I think sabbath were heavy rock in the 70s and they only had 2 metal songs eg Sympton and Bloody sabbath which i dislike in parts
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:35
dr prog wrote:
I'm not a fan of metal at all. Anything that has to be heavier than Heavy rock is pointless and done because of a fad imo
I'm not a fan of rock at all. Anything that has to be heavier than soft folk is pointless and done because of a fad imo.
Posted By: dr prog
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:40
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
I'm not a fan of metal at all. Anything that has to be heavier than Heavy rock is pointless and done because of a fad imo
I'm not a fan of rock at all. Anything that has to be heavier than soft folk is pointless and done because of a fad imo.
Good for you. As for metal, screaming/growling vocals only bring music down.
Posted By: Purple_Floyd
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:46
Thanks for all your answers. I've read them all Seems like a mod/admin changed my thread name and added "prog" to it. I won't change it back, but my scope was larger then just metal prog.
rogerthat wrote:
Red, SEBTP, DSOTM, CTTE
I know Red, I know DSOTM, but SEBTP and CTTE?
Alitare wrote:
Nathaniel607 wrote:
I love prog metal! I think it gets way too much
shtick with people just bashing it for no
easily discernible reason...
Because the trillions of Dream Theater knock-offs
pollute the air, because the other instruments usually take a backseat
to the electric guitar and vocalist, because the entire metal paradigm
is one that eschews half the human emotional palette, because they tend
to swarm to metal due to their lack of abilities when it comes to
writing eminently memorable melodies, because half the genre is built
around impressing rather than affecting or impacting, because most metal
has nothing to do with subtlety, because distortion can mask inferior
playing abilities, because people involved with it tend to care more
about image and style rather than sheer musical qualities, because the
genre lacks a distinct edge for experimentation, because it's typically
so damn derivative and unoriginal. Just look at those trillions upon
trillions of Iron Maiden albums and Iron Maiden ripoffs releasing the
same long, droning, unoriginal tripe year after year, because it
propagates this new silly loudness war, because it's often based only on
wh can play faster or louder or whatever, because people associated
with the genre seem to typically take flash over substance, because it
tends to be lyrically banal and adolescent.
There's
a nice list of easily discernible reasons. Note: none of these are
intended to be generalizations. This also isn't directed toward post
metal, or bands such as Pain of Salvation or Devin Townsend. This list
doesn't regard ALL prog metal, just the majority, so don't jump with
your inane defenses thinking I've gone and done something ugly and
erroneous to deface your oh-so-holy genre and forgotten X such and such
group or Y such and such group that totally obliterates my preconceived
notions of the genre. It don't work like that, Mack. And remember, this
is coming from a guy who used to utterly worship heavy metal,
progressive or otherwise.
That's the kind of post I was looking for in this thread.
I have to agree with you. Load of crap being made. Still, it won't change the fact that I like Dream Theater (But I used to love them a lot) but I would take PoS (at least, before Scarsick ) before any other metal act.
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:46
dr prog wrote:
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
I'm not a fan of metal at all. Anything that has to be heavier than Heavy rock is pointless and done because of a fad imo
I'm not a fan of rock at all. Anything that has to be heavier than soft folk is pointless and done because of a fad imo.
Good for you. As for metal, screaming/growling vocals only bring music down.
Since when did all metal vocals constitute screaming and growling? Does this mean Geoff Tate is a figment of my imagination?
Posted By: dr prog
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:49
Metal was never good imo. There's always something in a metal song which makes it non enjoyable but most metal is awful though. Heavy rock is the perfect heavy sound. It is a much better style than Hard rock which is limited to standard hard rock bass playing
Posted By: dr prog
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:52
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
I'm not a fan of metal at all. Anything that has to be heavier than Heavy rock is pointless and done because of a fad imo
I'm not a fan of rock at all. Anything that has to be heavier than soft folk is pointless and done because of a fad imo.
Good for you. As for metal, screaming/growling vocals only bring music down.
Since when did all metal vocals constitute screaming and growling? Does this mean Geoff Tate is a figment of my imagination?
Who's that?
70s prog is meaner than any metal anyway. Heavy bass craps on guitar riffs
Posted By: dr prog
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:54
This is heavy perfection. Any heavier and it would start to suck
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:56
dr prog wrote:
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
I'm not a fan of metal at all. Anything that has to be heavier than Heavy rock is pointless and done because of a fad imo
I'm not a fan of rock at all. Anything that has to be heavier than soft folk is pointless and done because of a fad imo.
Good for you. As for metal, screaming/growling vocals only bring music down.
Since when did all metal vocals constitute screaming and growling? Does this mean Geoff Tate is a figment of my imagination?
Who's that?
70s prog is meaner than any metal anyway. Heavy bass craps on guitar riffs
Meaner? Don't tell me you think Rush is 'meaner' than Slayer. :P
You're a f**king silly person. I don't particularly care for any one sound. It's the melodies that I care for. I hate heavy rock MORE than metal, because it's the same damn thing, only less forceful in general.
Posted By: dr prog
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:00
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
I'm not a fan of metal at all. Anything that has to be heavier than Heavy rock is pointless and done because of a fad imo
I'm not a fan of rock at all. Anything that has to be heavier than soft folk is pointless and done because of a fad imo.
Good for you. As for metal, screaming/growling vocals only bring music down.
Since when did all metal vocals constitute screaming and growling? Does this mean Geoff Tate is a figment of my imagination?
Who's that?
70s prog is meaner than any metal anyway. Heavy bass craps on guitar riffs
Meaner? Don't tell me you think Rush is 'meaner' than Slayer. :P
You're a f**king silly person. I don't particularly care for any one sound. It's the melodies that I care for. I hate heavy rock MORE than metal, because it's the same damn thing, only less forceful in general.
Metal doesn't have melody, it never did. Lots of prog gives me shivers because of the way they merge rock with jazz and classical music. The busy and catchy ideas and the sound and instruments they use absolutely smash metal to pieces. Metal doesnt put a single shiver down my spine. It makes me laugh. The compositions are weak, it's all about how loud and fast they be. American based crap
Posted By: Repner
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:02
dr prog wrote:
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
I'm not a fan of metal at all. Anything that has to be heavier than Heavy rock is pointless and done because of a fad imo
I'm not a fan of rock at all. Anything that has to be heavier than soft folk is pointless and done because of a fad imo.
Good for you. As for metal, screaming/growling vocals only bring music down.
Since when did all metal vocals constitute screaming and growling? Does this mean Geoff Tate is a figment of my imagination?
Who's that?
70s prog is meaner than any metal anyway. Heavy bass craps on guitar riffs
Meaner? Don't tell me you think Rush is 'meaner' than Slayer. :P
You're a f**king silly person. I don't particularly care for any one sound. It's the melodies that I care for. I hate heavy rock MORE than metal, because it's the same damn thing, only less forceful in general.
Metal doesn't have melody, it never did
You haven't heard much metal, have you?
-------------
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:04
dr prog wrote:
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Alitare wrote:
dr prog wrote:
I'm not a fan of metal at all. Anything that has to be heavier than Heavy rock is pointless and done because of a fad imo
I'm not a fan of rock at all. Anything that has to be heavier than soft folk is pointless and done because of a fad imo.
Good for you. As for metal, screaming/growling vocals only bring music down.
Since when did all metal vocals constitute screaming and growling? Does this mean Geoff Tate is a figment of my imagination?
Who's that?
70s prog is meaner than any metal anyway. Heavy bass craps on guitar riffs
Meaner? Don't tell me you think Rush is 'meaner' than Slayer. :P
You're a f**king silly person. I don't particularly care for any one sound. It's the melodies that I care for. I hate heavy rock MORE than metal, because it's the same damn thing, only less forceful in general.
Metal doesn't have melody, it never did
So all those vocal hooks and NOTES BEING PLAYED in all those Pain of Salvation songs aren't real? Why aren't those CLASSIFIED MELODIES, melodies? I mean, isn't a melody a pattern of notes? These songs have patterns of notes, therefore either your logic is inane, a completely ignorant hallucination, or you're trolling. I have faith in you and immediately assume the latter.
That being said, if you are a troll, I've seen better. I used to troll these hallowed halls with the best of 'em. :P
Posted By: Repner
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:08
He might be. There's opinion, and then theres opinion based on nonsense
As for your opinion, sure there are a lot of "shredder" bands, but for quite a lot of the metal bands I've been seeing, I personally have to disagree.
-------------
Posted By: dr prog
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:11
Of course there's metal i havent heard but all that death, black, thrash is just attrocious imo. I've heard enough of Tool and Opeth to not rate them. I like Opeth's non metal songs though but then I listen to their metal and think what a waste of a band with good ideas and a rare great voice. Every Tool song has the same pattern and that annoying annoying voice. Extremely limited composers Tool are
Posted By: Repner
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:18
dr prog wrote:
Of course there's metal i havent heard but all that death, black, thrash is just attrocious imo. I've heard enough of Tool and Opeth to not rate them. I like Opeth's non metal songs though but then I listen to their metal and think what a waste of a band with good ideas and a rare great voice
A great singer will always be a "waste" to people who don't like their genre. Mikeal plays in a style he wants to play, and there are people that like it. Hardly a waste just because there are people who aren't into (or in your case just outright don't get) metal
I'm not the biggest fan of jazz, but I don't think it's a waste of fine musicians. They do what they like to do
-------------
Posted By: dr prog
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:20
Repner wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Of course there's metal i havent heard but all that death, black, thrash is just attrocious imo. I've heard enough of Tool and Opeth to not rate them. I like Opeth's non metal songs though but then I listen to their metal and think what a waste of a band with good ideas and a rare great voice
A great singer will always be a "waste" to people who don't like their genre. Mikeal plays in a style he wants to play, and there are people that like it. Hardly a waste just because there are people who aren't into (or in your case just outright don't get) metal
I'm not the biggest fan of jazz, but I don't think it's a waste of fine musicians. They do what they like to do
he sings great. Growling is a terrible fad which has lasted 25 years
Posted By: Repner
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:21
dr prog wrote:
Repner wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Of course there's metal i havent heard but all that death, black, thrash is just attrocious imo. I've heard enough of Tool and Opeth to not rate them. I like Opeth's non metal songs though but then I listen to their metal and think what a waste of a band with good ideas and a rare great voice
A great singer will always be a "waste" to people who don't like their genre. Mikeal plays in a style he wants to play, and there are people that like it. Hardly a waste just because there are people who aren't into (or in your case just outright don't get) metal
I'm not the biggest fan of jazz, but I don't think it's a waste of fine musicians. They do what they like to do
he sings great. Growling is a terrible fad which has lasted 25 years
And yet, some people like it. It's still only a sub-genre of the whole metal genre
-------------
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:23
Repner wrote:
He might be. There's opinion, and then theres opinion based on nonsense
As for your opinion, sure there are a lot of "shredder" bands, but for quite a lot of the metal bands I've been seeing, I personally have to disagree.
I know, which is said I wasn't attempting to generalize. If a band isn't shred, it isn't. I personally adore Ayreon and Queensryche and Savatage and Atheist and Death and Metallica and Pain of Salvation and Devin Townsend and Cynic and Opeth and maudlin of the Well and Alice in Chains and Judas Priest and Rainbow (only with Dio) and blah blah blah. I'm not trying to speak blindly.
Posted By: Repner
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:27
Alitare wrote:
Repner wrote:
He might be. There's opinion, and then theres opinion based on nonsense
As for your opinion, sure there are a lot of "shredder" bands, but for quite a lot of the metal bands I've been seeing, I personally have to disagree.
I know, which is said I wasn't attempting to generalize. If a band isn't shred, it isn't. I personally adore Ayreon and Queensryche and Savatage and Atheist and Death and Metallica and Pain of Salvation and Devin Townsend and Cynic and Opeth and maudlin of the Well and Alice in Chains and Judas Priest and Rainbow (only with Dio) and blah blah blah. I'm not trying to speak blindly.
I get you. I thought that's what you meant by the part when you said it pushes the other instruments to the back (probably should have quoted that)
-------------
Posted By: dr prog
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:28
Repner wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Repner wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Of course there's metal i havent heard but all that death, black, thrash is just attrocious imo. I've heard enough of Tool and Opeth to not rate them. I like Opeth's non metal songs though but then I listen to their metal and think what a waste of a band with good ideas and a rare great voice
A great singer will always be a "waste" to people who don't like their genre. Mikeal plays in a style he wants to play, and there are people that like it. Hardly a waste just because there are people who aren't into (or in your case just outright don't get) metal
I'm not the biggest fan of jazz, but I don't think it's a waste of fine musicians. They do what they like to do
he sings great. Growling is a terrible fad which has lasted 25 years
And yet, some people like it. It's still only a sub-genre of the whole metal genre
you'll probably notice most of these people are either angry or depressed too lol
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:35
dr prog wrote:
Repner wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Repner wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Of course there's metal i havent heard but all that death, black, thrash is just attrocious imo. I've heard enough of Tool and Opeth to not rate them. I like Opeth's non metal songs though but then I listen to their metal and think what a waste of a band with good ideas and a rare great voice
A great singer will always be a "waste" to people who don't like their genre. Mikeal plays in a style he wants to play, and there are people that like it. Hardly a waste just because there are people who aren't into (or in your case just outright don't get) metal
I'm not the biggest fan of jazz, but I don't think it's a waste of fine musicians. They do what they like to do
he sings great. Growling is a terrible fad which has lasted 25 years
And yet, some people like it. It's still only a sub-genre of the whole metal genre
you'll probably notice most of these people are either angry or depressed too lol
I was under the impression that every single human being gets mad or sad, sometimes. Don't you watch Ni-Hao, Kai-Lan?
Posted By: Repner
Date Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:43
dr prog wrote:
Repner wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Repner wrote:
dr prog wrote:
Of course there's metal i havent heard but all that death, black, thrash is just attrocious imo. I've heard enough of Tool and Opeth to not rate them. I like Opeth's non metal songs though but then I listen to their metal and think what a waste of a band with good ideas and a rare great voice
A great singer will always be a "waste" to people who don't like their genre. Mikeal plays in a style he wants to play, and there are people that like it. Hardly a waste just because there are people who aren't into (or in your case just outright don't get) metal
I'm not the biggest fan of jazz, but I don't think it's a waste of fine musicians. They do what they like to do
he sings great. Growling is a terrible fad which has lasted 25 years
And yet, some people like it. It's still only a sub-genre of the whole metal genre
you'll probably notice most of these people are either angry or depressed too lol
Yeah. Damn those cheesy power metal bands and their cheesy fantasy songs. They should calm the f*** down. They might get a hernia
-------------
Posted By: Plankowner
Date Posted: May 18 2011 at 02:22
Purple_Floyd wrote:
I didn't know where to post this topic, considering it's more about progressive metal than anything else.
I've always been a big metal fan. It's also the sub-genre that introduced me to music in general, and to prog later. Still today, even if I'm listening to a lot more of rock-prog, I still have a inclination towards well written metal pieces, like some Dream Theater epics, etc. Though, I've never believed that it was in any way a superior sub-change, just as respectable as any kind of genres (Except for commercial pop ;p).
Sadly, two of my friends doesn't have the same opinions as me. One of them listen to a lot of jazz/pop/retro (He's an hipster, after all) and the other listen exclusively to classical music.
Their general consensus is that, while metal music can be melodic, it's without doubt emotionless, violent, and overall unimpressive mess that tries to put as many notes as possible in their songs.
I blieve their description is deeply inaccurate, considering the many highly emotional, complex (and sometimes calm!) albums and songs made by artists like Pain of Salvation, Opeth, Maudlin of the Well, Fates Warning, Ayreon, Riverside or, once again, Dream Theater.
I would love to hear some opinions from people on PA around metal, especially metal prog, whether you like it or not. I believe I can count on the community to be a lot more open-minded then my pals.