Stewart or Beck?
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics not related to music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=77773
Printed Date: November 28 2024 at 09:00 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Stewart or Beck?
Posted By: Theriver
Subject: Stewart or Beck?
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 13:08
The one you prefer or would trust the most?
Personaly i vote Jon Stewart, I think Beck is crazy...
|
Replies:
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 13:27
Stewart is at least being crazy intentionally. But here's the thing: Stewart does a great impression of Beck. I'm not entirely certain that Stewart can be imitated.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 13:29
....how so? In terms of views?
In that case I take Stewart by miles. Agree with him way before Beck.
In terms of entertainment? Well, I guess also Stewart since Beck is just a nut, but at least he's not supposed to be funny.
|
Posted By: TheClosing
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 16:36
Don't care about either really, but I trust Beck just about as much as I trust Richard Nixon. Or should I say zombie Nixon ...
|
Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 16:55
Stewart. Glen Beck is funny, but only in a pathetically ironic sort of way.
------------- ...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 17:10
TheClosing wrote:
Don't care about either really, but I trust Beck just about as much as I trust Richard Nixon. Or should I say zombie Nixon ... | What about Nixon's head in a jar on Futurama?
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 17:21
Actually, Stewart is funnier, but Beck is more entertaining.
-------------
|
Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 17:24
At least Beck does research regardless of how crazy his conclusions are. Stewart is just a comedian.
Then again, what's the point of the poll?
------------- http://blindpoetrecords.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Theriver
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 17:51
The Truth wrote:
At least Beck does research regardless of how crazy his conclusions are. Stewart is just a comedian.
Then again, what's the point of the poll? |
Does evrything needs to have a point?
|
Posted By: manofmystery
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 18:37
Not that I think Beck would be at all good at running anything but I couldn't possibly vote for Jon Stewart. He's a vile, deceitful, unhappy, little man like most left-wing whores. The worst part about Stewart is that he hides behind his non-existant comedy so that he can spinelessly slotch down and look innocent when interviewed. He's basically Janeane Garofalo without the balls. There are few people I despise more on this planet that Jon Stewart and his lacky Colbert.
-------------
Time always wins.
|
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 18:49
I thought this was about Rod Stewart and Jeff beck
|
Posted By: Evolver
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 19:13
Stewart is funny on purpose.
Beck is at best pathetic, at worst, dangerous.
For a right wing comedian, Dennis Miller was funny, even after he went openly right wing. Then he just petered out.
------------- Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 19:25
Triceratopsoil wrote:
I thought this was about Rod Stewart and Jeff beck
| I thought the same thing.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Any Colour You Like
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 20:07
Glenn Beck makes me lol far too much, I mean he espouses everything with an inflection that suggests the state of human existence depends on his revelations.
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 20:10
The Truth wrote:
At least Beck does research regardless of how crazy his conclusions are. Stewart is just a comedian.
|
Nah not anymore, but I won't go down that road again
|
Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 21:19
He's still a joke is more like it.
And not a funny one. He's kind of like uncalled-for flatuence. It's just not funny.
------------- http://blindpoetrecords.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 21:27
The Truth wrote:
He's still a joke is more like it.
And not a funny one. He's kind of like uncalled-for flatuence. It's just not funny. |
long JJ rant in condensed form:
Stewart used to be funny, then became serous. He hides behind a poor poor attempt of humor, but is as serious as Beck! Of course the few times he's been called out on it he just says "lolwut this is a comedy show chill" and every young liberal in America now loves him and as a god who can do no wrong.
Yes, coming from a young liberal. Huzzah!
|
Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 21:36
JJLehto wrote:
The Truth wrote:
He's still a joke is more like it.
And not a funny one. He's kind of like uncalled-for flatuence. It's just not funny. |
long JJ rant in condensed form:
Stewart used to be funny, then became serous. He hides behind a poor poor attempt of humor, but is as serious as Beck! Of course the few times he's been called out on it he just says "lolwut this is a comedy show chill" and every young liberal in America now loves him and as a god who can do no wrong.
Yes, coming from a young liberal. Huzzah!
|
That makes a person a god? I've been doing this wrong...
------------- http://blindpoetrecords.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 21:40
Posted By: SaltyJon
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 21:44
Slartibartfast wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
I thought this was about Rod Stewart and Jeff beck
| I thought the same thing.
|
As did I.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Salty_Jon" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 23:21
Anyway, I prefer Jeff Beck
|
Posted By: El Pollo Guerrera
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 00:13
Jon Stewart. I still find him funny.
|
Posted By: crimhead
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 03:05
Triceratopsoil wrote:
I thought this was about Rod Stewart and Jeff beck
|
This.
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 03:14
I really don't understand why you made this thread. PA is not someplace you are going to get much support for Glenn Beck.
JJ is right about Jon, but mom needs to chill out.
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: manofmystery
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 14:35
Henry Plainview wrote:
I really don't understand why you made this thread. PA is not someplace you are going to get much support for Glenn Beck.
JJ is right about Jon, but mom needs to chill out.
|
Never! Go to your room, young man.
-------------
Time always wins.
|
Posted By: Slaughternalia
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 19:05
More than zero votes for Beck? I am disappointed, progarchives. He is quite literally absolutely bananas. I have nothing wrong with people who have a right-wing view on politics, but come on.
|
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 20:04
Slaughternalia wrote:
More than zero votes for Beck? I am disappointed, progarchives. He is quite literally absolutely bananas. I have nothing wrong with people who have a right-wing view on politics, but come on. |
LOL, you taking this poll seriously bro?
|
Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 21:09
They're both nuts in their own way, this poll should be moved to JFF.
------------- http://blindpoetrecords.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 22:29
Padraic wrote:
Slaughternalia wrote:
More than zero votes for Beck? I am disappointed, progarchives. He is quite literally absolutely bananas. I have nothing wrong with people who have a right-wing view on politics, but come on. | LOL, you taking this poll seriously bro? | I'm disappointed we fans of prog rock must be so predictable in your book....
-------------
|
Posted By: The Monodrone
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 22:49
The Truth wrote:
They're both nuts in their own way, this poll should be moved to JFF. |
lol
Stewart tells the truth in a comedic fashion.
Beck tells lies in a comedic fashion.
-------------
|
Posted By: manofmystery
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 22:54
The Monodrone wrote:
The Truth wrote:
They're both nuts in their own way, this poll should be moved to JFF. |
lol
Stewart tells the lies in a non-comedic fashion.
Beck tells half-truths, half-insane-political/religious-ramblings in a sometimes comedic fashion. |
fixed that for you
-------------
Time always wins.
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 23:34
manofmystery wrote:
The Monodrone wrote:
The Truth wrote:
They're both nuts in their own way, this poll should be moved to JFF. |
lol
Stewart tells the lies in a non-comedic fashion.
Beck tells half-truths, half-insane-political/religious-ramblings in a sometimes comedic fashion. |
fixed that for you |
I think Jon cares more about the truth than Glenn. Usually when he's distorting the truth somewhat it's so he can continue to appear relentlessly centrist rather than for comedy purposes.
Also, just because you do not find something funny does not mean it is not presented in a comedic fashion. ;-)
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 23:56
HP, you baffle me. You are a mix of a right-wing fascist and a left-wing... fascist. So actually you're quite coherent
Beck is less funny than Stewart. Beck is not a comedian. Stewart is. But Beck sometimes says truths, while Stewart rarely does.
-------------
|
Posted By: manofmystery
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 00:03
Henry Plainview wrote:
manofmystery wrote:
The Monodrone wrote:
The Truth wrote:
They're both nuts in their own way, this poll should be moved to JFF. |
lol
Stewart tells the lies in a non-comedic fashion.
Beck tells half-truths, half-insane-political/religious-ramblings in a sometimes comedic fashion. |
fixed that for you |
I think Jon cares more about the truth than Glenn. Usually when he's distorting the truth somewhat it's so he can continue to appear relentlessly centrist rather than for comedy purposes.
Also, just because you do not find something funny does not mean it is not presented in a comedic fashion. ;-) |
If his shtick can appear relentlessly centrist to anyone than the country has a larger perception (or stupidy) problem than I thought.
Also, didn't I tell you to go to your room, young man?
-------------
Time always wins.
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 00:06
The T wrote:
HP, you baffle me. You are a mix of a right-wing fascist and a left-wing... fascist. So actually you're quite coherent
Beck is less funny than Stewart. Beck is not a comedian. Stewart is. But Beck sometimes says truths, while Stewart rarely does. |
I am curious what views of Jon you would consider fascist.
I don't pretend I have an internally consistent ideology. :P However, as for your and mom's complaints that Jon lies while Glenn is sometimes right, I would say that your perception of reality is much different from most people's. ;-)
manofmystery wrote:
If his shtick can appear relentlessly centrist to anyone than the country has a larger perception (or stupidy) problem than I thought. |
He's been more on the offensive against Fox and the Republicans lately, partly because of his liberal ideology and partly because they're easier targets, but most of the time, especially when he gets all serious, he tries to paint both sides as more or less equally stupid and what we need to do to move the country forward is to ignore all these crazy extremists on both sides and come an agreement that 80% of America would agree to, but they don't have the chance because the other 20% is so much louder and more motivated that they drown out all rational discourse. I don't know what else you would call that. Wikipedia tells me that centrism has some conations that I was not aware of, so if you would like to replace that with the word moderate that is fine with me.
Also, didn't I tell you to go to your room, young man? |
F*CK YOU I WON'T DO WHAT YOU TELL ME
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 00:26
Glenn Beck is a preacher. That's what he is at the core. He's not an informer, and he's not reasonable. He's driven by religious, irrational patriotism and neo-con zeal. He is the biggest drama queen on television/radio. He is the Nancy Grace of whatever he does.
Jon Stewert, well. He's self-deprecating enough for me to like him, but the clash between everyone in his target audience and himself being liberal and actually trying not to be liberal makes his show naught but comedy. He's nothing even close to serious. I suppose that doesn't need clarification.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 00:33
stonebeard wrote:
Jon Stewert, well. He's self-deprecating enough for me to like him |
On the rare occasions I tune in, I can't stand it when he makes a joke about how bad the joke he just told was. You have a dozen writers, STOP IT! The primary failing of both TDS and CR as comedy shows is that, because of the time constraints, much of the shows are a limited number of jokes they cycle through and apply to the current situation. This quickly becomes tedious, and I don't know how people can stand to watch the shows every day for years now and still laugh.
Also, the crowd not shutting up for the first minute of each episode is the most annoying thing ever.
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 00:53
HP, I didn't say Stewart is a fascist (though his love of big government is worrisome), I said YOU are a fascist . Sometimes you appear on the conservative side, sometimes you have socialist tendencies, but always your view seems to be that whatever is chosen has to be the only way, any decision has to be driven down people's throats, by force, totally absolutist. Left or right wing, fascism is the name.
And the fact that most people disagree with one's views doesn't make one wrong or the rest right. Tsk tsk where's the logic? In fact, I'd say most of the time less people are going to be right than wrong. Also, i'd say the US being so screwed as it is of late has a lot to do with the majority being dead wrong for a LONG time.
Beck of course ruins the truths he sometimes says with his neo-con beliefs and his religiousness. He's also somewhat fascist behind that cover of liberty he tries go portray.
-------------
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 00:57
T, you are putting more thought into my posts than I am.
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 01:04
well said.
-------------
|
Posted By: Evolver
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 06:26
Slaughternalia wrote:
More than zero votes for Beck? I am disappointed, progarchives. He is quite literally absolutely bananas. I have nothing wrong with people who have a right-wing view on politics, but come on. |
You are being completely unfair to bananas.
------------- Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
|
Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 08:26
I really really want Beck's 15 minutes to be over.
All I know of Stewart are youtube clips people send me. They're funny, but I wonder how much boring crap you have to wade through to get some funny stuff.
I'm boring...when I want LOLs I'll put on What About Bob or Tropic Thunder. Politics makes me cry.
------------- You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
|
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 09:00
Negoba wrote:
I really really want Beck's 15 minutes to be over.
|
But then Media Matters would be out of business.
|
Posted By: crimhead
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 13:15
Padraic wrote:
Negoba wrote:
I really really want Beck's 15 minutes to be over.
|
But then Media Matters would be out of business.
|
They'd still have Hannity,and Rush to fact check.
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 13:45
I don't like those neo-con apostles but sometimes they say truths... They're less horrible than they're portrayed...
-------------
|
Posted By: thellama73
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 13:51
Definitely Glenn Beck. I have problems with him a lot, but he provides a much needed service of awakening people to the ways in which their freedoms are taken away. In many ways, I think Jon Stewart has become irrelevant.
-------------
|
Posted By: Stooge
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 16:32
I haven't watched The Daily Show in years, and I never payed Glenn Beck any attention. No vote.
------------- A fun place to review and discuss metal: http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/" rel="nofollow - MetalMusicArchives
|
Posted By: Evolver
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 18:07
thellama73 wrote:
Definitely Glenn Beck. I have problems with him a lot, but he provides a much needed service of awakening people to the ways in which their freedoms are taken away. In many ways, I think Jon Stewart has become irrelevant. |
Like him or not, Stewart & Colbert's rally last year woul argue against their irrelevance.
Beck only parrots the right wing extemists distortions (mostly) about how the "left" (actually centrists) are taking your freedoms (sound like South Park shouting "They took our jobs!"), while ignoring the Republicans' war on the middle class. His loss of his show could be the start of his irrelevance (with any luck).
------------- Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
|
Posted By: thellama73
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 21:27
Evolver wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Definitely Glenn Beck. I have problems with him a lot, but he provides a much needed service of awakening people to the ways in which their freedoms are taken away. In many ways, I think Jon Stewart has become irrelevant. |
Like him or not, Stewart & Colbert's rally last year woul argue against their irrelevance.
Beck only parrots the right wing extemists distortions (mostly) about how the "left" (actually centrists) are taking your freedoms (sound like South Park shouting "They took our jobs!"), while ignoring the Republicans' war on the middle class. His loss of his show could be the start of his irrelevance (with any luck). |
If you're saying that all American liberals are "centrist" then what do you consider left?
-------------
|
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 21:32
He's right, though, the American Democrat party is about as far left as Canada's conservative party.
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 22:03
Thank science for that. A lot of liberal policies are mind-numbingly dumb.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: Evolver
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 22:07
Triceratopsoil is correct. The Democratic party is so terrified of the Republicans, who have drifted as far right as they can without invoking Godwin's law, that they are afraid of even barely resembling a liberal.
------------- Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
|
Posted By: thellama73
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 22:32
So who resembles a liberal? You didn't answer my original question.
-------------
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 22:40
^He probably wants real, self-declared socialists and communists...
And stop calling lefties "liberals"! Liberalism is actually the ideology of freedom and free market! How mixed-up terms are in the US. It was a nice play from the left to manage to be called "liberals", so that the right had nothing to do but to sound extreme....
Some people here can't differentiate a republican from a conservative from a libertarian... They are SO different. What Evolver calls "republicans who wage war on the middle class" are really neo-cons, corporatists and religious nuts, fascists in disguise with just a few clear economic ideas. But believe me Evolver, we want more freedom for you than you want for everybody...
-------------
|
Posted By: manofmystery
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 22:53
Evolver wrote:
Triceratopsoil is correct. The Democratic party is so terrified of the Republicans, who have drifted as far right as they can without invoking Godwin's law, that they are afraid of even barely resembling a liberal. |
I think you got hold of a bad batch of crack or something.
I guess anything short of a Michael Moore dictatorship would be far too right wing for you. You know, the whole right vs. left argument is just a smoke screen anyway. Both parties are authoritarian parties and have veered away from the nation's founding principals. Your problem, along with those on the "right" and "left", is that you feel everyone needs to live by your standards. From where I stand, you might as well be Sean Hannity.
-------------
Time always wins.
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 23:28
manofmystery wrote:
I guess anything short of a Michael Moore dictatorship would be far too right wing for you. |
I don't know if it's a judgement call so much as pointing out the fact that in Europe/Canada/(probably South America? I am an ignorant American) the Democratic Party as it stands today would not be considered "left-wing" because they're not socialists, and they run and hide if anyone attempts to call them one.
And you didn't respond to my reply about Jon being a centrist.
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: thellama73
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 23:45
I guess it depends on whether you define these terms according to the current climate, or historically speaking. I guess it is true that the American left is less overtly socialist (although I really don't think by that much) than the left is, say, Western Europe. By the standards of 19th century America, I think todays Republicans would seem anything but conservative. Since my favorite president is Grover Cleveland (who was a Democrat, btw) I tend to evaluate things in that context.
-------------
|
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 23:57
I'm... not going to try and explain the concept of a liberal party.
|
Posted By: thellama73
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 00:05
Triceratopsoil wrote:
I'm... not going to try and explain the concept of a liberal party.
|
I think they generally involve lots of weed and Grateful Dead music.
-------------
|
Posted By: manofmystery
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 00:12
Henry Plainview wrote:
manofmystery wrote:
I guess anything short of a Michael Moore dictatorship would be far too right wing for you. |
I don't know if it's a judgement call so much as pointing out the fact that in Europe/Canada/(probably South America? I am an ignorant American) the Democratic Party as it stands today would not be considered "left-wing" because they're not socialists, and they run and hide if anyone attempts to call them one.
And you didn't respond to my reply about Jon being a centrist.
|
What required a response? The percentages you pulled out of your ass?
Your first paragraph here is also pointless. As I mentioned above, the buzzwords don't mean anything. It doesn't matter what the labels are in other countries.
A true "centrist" in America today is just someone unable to decide which of the two current extremes they'd rather bend over and take it from. I suppose that beats the rank and file members of each of the two extremes, though, who are more than happy to take it (and force others to take it) from their leaders while being downright outraged when the other side is in power and uses a slightly different lube.
-------------
Time always wins.
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 00:35
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 00:45
The democrat party outside of the US would be considered a center party or even right wing party because they supposedly defend the market, and that is quite extreme in the eyes of the left in other countries. To be considered left, a party really has to attack all kinds of privatization and defend statism (not that the democrats aren't doing this anyway). Extreme left is going on and proclaim Marx, Lenin and Guevara as your guiding lights, and holding Cuba as paradise on earth.
But this is the reality: both in the US and the rest of the world MOST parties are about the same. Some say they want more government, some want less, some want freer market, some want more regulation, but pretty much NONE is arguing in favor of the elimination or at least drastic reduction of government and the total or almost total liberation of the market. Politics is based on how to gain power. Power defines politics. A group/movement that wants to eliminate the source of all the indefinite power is looked upon with contempt by politicians because it's attacking the very essence of their game, their very blood supply. Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh, Stewart, Maher, they all want the same but with different names: a state that still rules and wages war and has absolutr monopoly of force. They just differ in details, in the ways they think will bring about prosperity and general well being (or their friends' and families', actually). For too long the actual real opposition to traditional parties has been denied its place: the opposition to pkwer, to government as a whole, an a living entity.
-------------
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 00:50
HP, I think "center" and its extremes have to be redefined. "Center" is what most people are, happy with government but not really wanting to become totally dependent on it; one extreme, let's call it "left" are those who want full government control of everything. The other real extreme are not conservatives or republicans or nothing: the other extreme is made of those who want zero, zilch, nada government, not even libertarians but anarchists. The old labels are wrong: they divide people by their allegiance to two exact ideas with different colorarions. Kind of the difference between bolsheviks and mensheviks in the Russian revolution, they're most the same. Anarchy is the real "other" extreme of politics.
-------------
|
Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 00:57
the centrist in Norway covers three partys the liberal Left party, the Centre party, the Christian Peoples party and the left parys is the Sosialist left party, the Labour party (though they are large enough to also ingulf some liberal views and from the 70s they have become more a hybreed Sosial democratic/liberal party) & Red party (comunist party the largest party whos not in the parlament) on the right we have the Conservative Right and the the Progressive pary...(which is a party full of goooooons )
real liberalism have both some roots in equality for all and equal rights to every one, but they also are rooted in nationalisme and national libaration movements, spessially in Norway during the campeins to get us out of the union with Sweden it was the Liberal Left (the oldest party in Norway) ho was the agitaters the ones hew held the flaming speaches, all the major writers/poets Henrik Wergeland, Bjoernstjerne Bjoernson, Arne Garborg, Henrik Ibsen was Liberal Leftist and fueld on the growing cultural nationalisme (one reason that political nationalsime never become so big in Norway during the libration period is becouse it was more cultural centerd, on cultural nationalisme revival not as a political tool) but to reinvoke a feeling that after 700 years of being subdued ether to Denmark or Sweden, which gave birth to some of Norways and Europs national romantic artist, becouse it was fueld by the intence nationalisme and liberationalistic enviroment in between 1850 to 1910.
-------------
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 06:04
thellama73 wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
I'm... not going to try and explain the concept of a liberal party.
|
I think they generally involve lots of weed and Grateful Dead music.
| Dude you get bonus points for that one.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 07:44
SaltyJon wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
I thought this was about Rod Stewart and Jeff beck | I thought the same thing.
|
As did I.
|
I thought it was about Dave Stewart and Beck Hansen....
...no I didn't, I thought Rod and Jeff too and that's the Truth
------------- What?
|
Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 08:23
For once I must agree with Teo.
Power is power, politics is politics. The differences between the parties lies mainly in which set of people they exchange favors with. Occasionally this coincides with some ideology, but that shifts quite a bit. The most astute capital owners of course have their tendrils in both parties.
Few leaders back up from the system enough to look at the system as a whole and make decisions outside the microcosm of these exchanges. Those that actually have some perspective rarely have much ability to change the dynamic.
The only solution I see is a drastic simplification in the way we exchange resources.
------------- You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
|
Posted By: manofmystery
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 08:55
Working from bottom to top:
Because he isn't. Jon Stewart is at one of the two extremes. He's decided who he wants to bend over for and uses what influence moronic college students/professors grant him to try and get them to make the same decision. Stewart is far more dispicable than Beck because he tries to hind his motives behind his pseudo-comedy.
I've been talking about how labels are incorrectly used. It doesn't help to further muddy the waters with unnecissary comparisons to countries with different systems.
Not sure why you keep bringing up that rally. Beck had about 3-4 times as many people at his just weeks before Stewart's. So what
-------------
Time always wins.
|
Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 09:01
As others have pointed out, neither Beck nor Stewart are at either extreme.
That's an illusion fed to us all to distract us from real issues.
------------- You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 14:20
Negoba wrote:
As others have pointed out, neither Beck nor Stewart are at either extreme.
That's an illusion fed to us all to distract us from real issues. |
-------------
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 16:08
T, I think centrist as a label is more useful as the middle of the two poles most people find acceptable rather than the exact 50% between complete totalitarianism and anarchy.
manofmystery wrote:
Working from bottom to top:
Because he isn't. Jon Stewart is at one of the two extremes. He's decided who he wants to bend over for and uses what influence moronic college students/professors grant him to try and get them to make the same decision. Stewart is far more dispicable than Beck because he tries to hind his motives behind his pseudo-comedy.
I've been talking about how labels are incorrectly used. It doesn't help to further muddy the waters with unnecissary comparisons to countries with different systems.
Not sure why you keep bringing up that rally. Beck had about 3-4 times as many people at his just weeks before Stewart's. So what |
If you honestly think The Daily Show presents an extreme leftist viewpoint, you have no idea what he is actually saying (probably because you don't watch the show because you don't find him funny). You should know what you're talking about before you get outraged. And if you have been watching his show for whatever reason and still think that then your grasp on reality is even more tenuous than I thought.
I keep bringing up the rally because the little speech at the end and what he said leading up to it is culmination of his moderate/centrist presentation.
And not that it matters at all to our discussion, but http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20021284-503544.html" rel="nofollow - your numbers on Jon/Glenn Beck are inverted .
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: manofmystery
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 17:09
I find the source for those numbers laughable, not that it matters. I'm just going to say that every union employee in the surrounding states was ordered to take the day off to attend, just to upset you. My news agency put a lot of research into that statement though, so don't dare question it.
Jon Stewart is a shill for his side and the attempts he makes to appear "centrist" by throwing in the occasional softball democrat joke are the most laughable part of his program. The democrat jokes are an intellectually insulting attempt to fool the feeble minded into believing he holds "moderate" beliefs. Conan O'Brien's monologue everynight is the same way but at least Conan isn't trying to make himself part of the political scene.
-------------
Time always wins.
|
Posted By: thellama73
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 18:00
What annoys me is Stewarts "why can't we all just get along?"routine. We can't all just get along because we have deply held beliefs that differ wildly on what is best for ourselves and our country. It seems to me that what he really wants is for us to roll over and let his side do whatever they want, all in the name of "civility." If keeping the peace is so important, why doesn't his team give in on everything the Republicans want?
-------------
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 19:08
manofmystery wrote:
I find the source for those numbers laughable, not that it matters. I'm just going to say that every union employee in the surrounding states was ordered to take the day off to attend, just to upset you. My news agency put a lot of research into that statement though, so don't dare question it.
Jon Stewart is a shill for his side and the attempts he makes to appear "centrist" by throwing in the occasional softball democrat joke are the most laughable part of his program. The democrat jokes are an intellectually insulting attempt to fool the feeble minded into believing he holds "moderate" beliefs. Conan O'Brien's monologue everynight is the same way but at least Conan isn't trying to make himself part of the political scene. |
This is why I only make joke posts in the libertarian thread. You can keep doing whatever it is you're doing here, but I'm not going to waste any more of my time with it.
thellama73 wrote:
What annoys me is Stewarts "why can't we all just get along?"routine. We can't all just get along because we have deply held beliefs that differ wildly on what is best for ourselves and our country. It seems to me that what he really wants is for us to roll over and let his side do whatever they want, all in the name of "civility." If keeping the peace is so important, why doesn't his team give in on everything the Republicans want? |
I don't think I need to explain why your last sentence is silly, but I do agree that the moderation is to extent wanting to get his agenda, since the Republicans would probably have to cave on more than the Democrats would to get to the "center". But that doesn't mean his presentation is not centrist.
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: manofmystery
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 22:52
Man, your joke posts really are funny
-------------
Time always wins.
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 23:05
Henry Plainview wrote:
This is why I only make joke posts in the libertarian thread. You can keep doing whatever it is you're doing here, but I'm not going to waste any more of my time with it. | What is this supposed to mean HP?
Anyway, HP, you've finally proved in the SR that you are actually a fascist. Again, even now that my beliefs are so different than in the past, democrats might be leftier than republicans but they aren't the leftiest it can get (though I believe is more of a matter of political maneuvering than actual centrism). Republicans also aren't really a different extreme. Come one Mom or Llama, republicans are the same sh*t with sometimes saner economic ideas but they are still power-hungry politicians wanting the government to play their game, not really wanting the government to stop playing any games. Republicans, as democrats, are so government-dependent that this whole Stewart-Beck thing is really a confrontation of interests being defended. The difference might be that there are a few republicans that still believe in true old liberalism (the laissez faire kind, the "government get the f**k out of our lives" kind) or even libertarianism. I'm not sure we could find a democrat interested in government backing down though...
Mom, the opposite of total government is not less government, but NO government, I'd say.
-------------
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 23:41
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 23:43
Come on HP Mom is like that, a little difficult to deal with .
-------------
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: April 27 2011 at 23:55
ITT: a whole lotta derp
I demand a Top 5 Comedians list from MoM anon to guess whether his funny is broken.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 28 2011 at 00:48
Long live Stewart and Colbert.
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: April 28 2011 at 00:52
Barking Weasel wrote:
Long live Stewart and Colbert.
|
Deep
-------------
|
Posted By: manofmystery
Date Posted: April 28 2011 at 08:56
The T wrote:
Henry Plainview wrote:
This is why I only make joke posts in the libertarian thread. You can keep doing whatever it is you're doing here, but I'm not going to waste any more of my time with it. | What is this supposed to mean HP?
Anyway, HP, you've finally proved in the SR that you are actually a fascist.
Again, even now that my beliefs are so different than in the past, democrats might be leftier than republicans but they aren't the leftiest it can get (though I believe is more of a matter of political maneuvering than actual centrism). Republicans also aren't really a different extreme. Come one Mom or Llama, republicans are the same sh*t with sometimes saner economic ideas but they are still power-hungry politicians wanting the government to play their game, not really wanting the government to stop playing any games. Republicans, as democrats, are so government-dependent that this whole Stewart-Beck thing is really a confrontation of interests being defended. The difference might be that there are a few republicans that still believe in true old liberalism (the laissez faire kind, the "government get the f**k out of our lives" kind) or even libertarianism. I'm not sure we could find a democrat interested in government backing down though...
Mom, the opposite of total government is not less government, but NO government, I'd say. |
When did I say anything to the contrary? I don't recall defending Republicans once. In fact, I believe I've blasted "left", "right", and "centrist" alike on this thread.
-------------
Time always wins.
|
Posted By: Earendil
Date Posted: May 29 2011 at 10:09
Stewart is too liberal for me, and Glenn Beck is too idiotic. I prefer Colbert by far.
|
Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: May 29 2011 at 10:54
The T wrote:
Barking Weasel wrote:
Long live Stewart and Colbert. |
Deep |
George Stroumboulopolos beets them both though but yeah Stewart and Colbert are really awesome hosts,
but Craig Ferguson is the funnyest host and one of the funnyest hosts ever,
-------------
|
Posted By: cannon
Date Posted: May 29 2011 at 11:26
aginor wrote:
The T wrote:
Barking Weasel wrote:
Long live Stewart and Colbert. |
Deep |
but Craig Ferguson is the funnyest host and one of the funnyest hosts ever, |
Ferguson has had me rolling on the floor sometimes.
Beck is a lunatic.
|
Posted By: Garden of Dreams
Date Posted: June 01 2011 at 16:09
Slartibartfast wrote:
TheClosing wrote:
Don't care about either really, but I trust Beck just about as much as I trust Richard Nixon. Or should I say zombie Nixon ... | What about Nixon's head in a jar on Futurama?
|
You can never trust the head of Richard Nixon. He might come into your house at night and wreck up the place.
Anyway, Stewart, Colbert, and Ferguson are all great in their own rights. Colbert has some of the best satire on T.V. (the best being the Onion News Network), Stewart has amazing correspondents and Ferguson has Geoff Peterson and Secretariat.
|
Posted By: CCVP
Date Posted: June 01 2011 at 18:55
Stewart is unfunny, Beck is a threat to the American public opinion.
My vote goes to the less dangerous one.
-------------
|
|