Print Page | Close Window

Phil Collins says something I didn't expect

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
Forum Description: Discuss specific prog bands and their members or a specific sub-genre
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=72626
Printed Date: February 02 2025 at 01:47
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Phil Collins says something I didn't expect
Posted By: two steves
Subject: Phil Collins says something I didn't expect
Date Posted: October 26 2010 at 22:15
Phil Collins did a long interview on the YES network in NYC (The Yes network is a funny name as it has nothing to do with the band---it is the network for all things  NY Yankees)  But it also has adult style interview shows.  He was asked what he thought was the most perfect representation of a Genesis song---and without a beat--he says, "Supper's Ready"!!!  Would not have thought that great prog song was on Phil's mind at all.  



Replies:
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: October 26 2010 at 22:40
Any links or video footage?


Posted By: Any Colour You Like
Date Posted: October 26 2010 at 22:44
Who'd have thought Phil Collins, the drummer for Genesis at the peak of their progressive era would enjoy prog of all things!


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: October 26 2010 at 23:13
After all he said in the 80's and 90's, I don't believe him.

His contradictions already posted of past threads are legendary.

Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: Anthony
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 03:43
Then why wasn't it played on the 2007 reunion tour?

-------------
Future prosperity lies in the way you heal the world with love
(Introitus - The hand that feeds you)


Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 04:09
Yeah, close study of Phil Collins will suggest the guy is very calculating. He knows that history treats his prog output much kinder than his pop output. I wouldn't put it past him for that to be a disingenuous answer in order to make critics and the old guard feel more kindly towards him.


Posted By: sigod
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 04:18
"Well what chance does that give me? Oh all right then, I AM the Messiah!"
 
"Well
 
The poor bugger can't win can he? Wink


-------------
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 04:22
Like I said, I would very much like a transcribed account or video footage of this interview so I can see for myself how quickly and honestly he seemed to respond to the question.


Posted By: Intruder
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 04:23

Just Phil the Shill selling the back catalouge by the pound....aren't the second wave of re-re-remasters out soon? 



-------------
I like to feel the suspense when you're certain you know I am there.....


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 04:24
He once claimed that The Lamb was his favourite album overall, which I thought was completely bizarre, but then perspectives can change over time. How he felt about the band when they were doing Invisible Touch may be very different to how he feels now with hindsight.

In any cse he wasn't being asked his favourite Genesis song, but which song was most representative of the band. There's a difference.



-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 04:28
Well, if you believe Phil, he and the other guys were the ones who really cared about the music on The Lamb while Gabriel just sat at a desk and wrote lyrics. Tongue


Posted By: topographicbroadways
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 06:38
Tony Banks wrote most of and then there were three up to mama and he always says the most complete genesis recording is supper's ready so it's not a surprise that they all still have a soft spot for the prog

-------------


Posted By: Roj
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 07:33
More like what we expect of Phil is what he said as a prelude to a solo show of his I saw recently on Sky Arts.  "Motown has always been my life" was the long and short of it.
 
Given that, I guess he actually prefers Sussussudio to anything Genesis ever made. 


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 07:40
Originally posted by Roj M30 Roj M30 wrote:

More like what we expect of Phil is what he said as a prelude to a solo show of his I saw recently on Sky Arts.  "Motown has always been my life" was the long and short of it.
 

Given that, I guess he actually prefers Sussussudio to anything Genesis ever made. 


I expect so. I saw that too. He was a massive Motown fan before joining Genesis, but he must have had a taste for progressive music to have spent the best part of a decade making it. He also used to go and see Yes at the Marquee club regularly as a teenager, and had expressed an interest in auditioning for them.

I guess he just prefers performing Motown music. I quite like Motown, but when Collins re-works those old classics, it just doesn't work for me at all. They are pale and weak immitations of how that music should be performed and produced.

-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: sigod
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 09:14
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

I guess he just prefers performing Motown music. I quite like Motown, but when Collins re-works those old classics, it just doesn't work for me at all. They are pale and weak immitations of how that music should be performed and produced.
Amen to that sentiment sir. There are very few artists who's covers can actually top the originals (The Tide Is High by Atomic Kitten being the exception to the rule of course Tongue)

-------------
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 13:01
Originally posted by sigod sigod wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

I guess he just prefers performing Motown music. I quite like Motown, but when Collins re-works those old classics, it just doesn't work for me at all. They are pale and weak immitations of how that music should be performed and produced.


Amen to that sentiment sir. There are very few artists who's covers can actually top the originals (The Tide Is High by Atomic Kitten being the exception to the rule of course Tongue)


Well naturally..

Good to see you on here again Simon. Hope all is well sir.

-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 14:01
Oh well, more Phil bashing.

Lest we forget, he was the drummer in one of the all time (some say ALL TIME) greatest prog bands of all time, and was, latterly, the singer and a writer. In other words, an integral part of the band, not a bit part player.

Why the hell wouldn't he be proud of this song and of his band?


-------------
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 14:13
^^^ Indeed.

-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: Evolver
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 14:44
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Oh well, more Phil bashing.

Lest we forget, he was the drummer in one of the all time (some say ALL TIME) greatest prog bands of all time, and was, latterly, the singer and a writer. In other words, an integral part of the band, not a bit part player.

Why the hell wouldn't he be proud of this song and of his band?
Phil
 [On bands copying Genesis]:" I wouldn`t wish it upon anybody to try and be successful in this day and age being a parody of a band nobody likes anyway."


-------------
Trust me. I know what I'm doing.


Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 14:48
Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Oh well, more Phil bashing.

Lest we forget, he was the drummer in one of the all time (some say ALL TIME) greatest prog bands of all time, and was, latterly, the singer and a writer. In other words, an integral part of the band, not a bit part player.

Why the hell wouldn't he be proud of this song and of his band?
Phil
 [On bands copying Genesis]:" I wouldn`t wish it upon anybody to try and be successful in this day and age being a parody of a band nobody likes anyway."


He's right, in the context of the modern music media, surely?

These days, you need to be a bunch of goons paradying a pile of crap on Simon Cowell's shows, mumble obscenities into a mic, or pretend you're hard and indy in order to get any publicity or mass record sales. You wouldn't get that by copying Genesis, I'm afraid. That's why a lot of modern prog is called "cult" by the media.

Thus, this was a comment on the media, not his band.

Give the guy a break, eh?


-------------
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!


Posted By: tarkus1980
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 14:52
Not terribly surprising.  His favorite track on <b>Lamb</b> is "The Waiting Room."  Phil is a man with eclectic taste who happens to have little taste when writing music on his own.

-------------
"History of Rock Written by the Losers."


Posted By: Chris S
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 14:55
So Phil woke up a couple of weeks ago and declared that " Supper's Ready" was the defining Genesis song. Let's bash him in the forums, how very progressive of usShocked
 
He can change his mind can't he? Approve


-------------
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]


Posted By: Chris S
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 14:59
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Oh well, more Phil bashing.

Lest we forget, he was the drummer in one of the all time (some say ALL TIME) greatest prog bands of all time, and was, latterly, the singer and a writer. In other words, an integral part of the band, not a bit part player.

Why the hell wouldn't he be proud of this song and of his band?
Phil
 [On bands copying Genesis]:" I wouldn`t wish it upon anybody to try and be successful in this day and age being a parody of a band nobody likes anyway."


He's right, in the context of the modern music media, surely?

These days, you need to be a bunch of goons paradying a pile of crap on Simon Cowell's shows, mumble obscenities into a mic, or pretend you're hard and indy in order to get any publicity or mass record sales. You wouldn't get that by copying Genesis, I'm afraid. That's why a lot of modern prog is called "cult" by the media.

Thus, this was a comment on the media, not his band.

Give the guy a break, eh?
ClapClapClap
 
Poor guy can't even have a sense of humourLOL


-------------
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]


Posted By: Garion81
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 15:24
Yeah lets not forget his love of fusion and Brand X either.  The guy has many facets to his style.  I don't care one way or the other what he has said at any given time. He has a right to his own opinion  whether or not the few thousand prog fans in the world agree with it  and he also has a right to change his point of view as well.  Sometimes this place is just too judgmental. 

-------------


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 15:30
Hi,
 
I would think that if there was one thing that he probably appreciated ... that got his band to where it did ... yep ... it was "Supper's Ready".
 
I don't see anything bad or suspicious about his comment ... and he might have already been prompted about the question ... meaning hte older Genesis ... the one that people remember and love deeply and still talk about in here ... you wouldn't imagine that he doesn't know that?
 
He knows ... and he does peruse the internet enough to know about the "progressive" music thing and how the early Genesis was such a big part of it. He's not stupid.


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: Gerinski
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 16:12
Are you sure he didn't say "Supper Can't Dance" ?  or maybe "Sussudio's Ready"?   LOL


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 16:41
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Oh well, more Phil bashing.

Lest we forget, he was the drummer in one of the all time (some say ALL TIME) greatest prog bands of all time, and was, latterly, the singer and a writer. In other words, an integral part of the band, not a bit part player.

Why the hell wouldn't he be proud of this song and of his band?

Well, even though many folks consider his band to be ''one of the all time greatest prog bands of all time'', as you so poetically put it, that doesn't mean he has to think so himself, and based on other stuff he's said in the past, it would be seem he doesn't. That's why this new quote might sound surprising/suspicious to a few people. Of course Phil is allowed to change his mind, but a lot of what he says never lines up over the course of all the related quotes he's made.


Posted By: CCVP
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 16:46
Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Oh well, more Phil bashing.

Lest we forget, he was the drummer in one of the all time (some say ALL TIME) greatest prog bands of all time, and was, latterly, the singer and a writer. In other words, an integral part of the band, not a bit part player.

Why the hell wouldn't he be proud of this song and of his band?
Phil
 [On bands copying Genesis]:" I wouldn`t wish it upon anybody to try and be successful in this day and age being a parody of a band nobody likes anyway."


Nobody ever liked Genesis. They have ever had poor album sales untill Selling England, which sold about 100k in the UK, being that the only place with significant album sales by that band. They took 8/9 years to have their breakthough album and from it they went downhill, so I guess he's right.


-------------


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 16:56
^ Hell, I still don't like Genesis nearly as much as the other bands that were around at the time. If you want an example of a prog act that was actually really well-known while they were still being innovative, look no further than Yes, ''The people's band''. 


Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 17:02

He's right, in the context of the modern music media, surely?

These days, you need to be a bunch of goons paradying a pile of crap on Simon Cowell's shows, mumble obscenities into a mic, or pretend you're hard and indy in order to get any publicity or mass record sales. You wouldn't get that by copying Genesis, I'm afraid. That's why a lot of modern prog is called "cult" by the media.

[/QUOTE]
 
well that depends on which part /era of Genesis you are copying Wink the 80s new wave heaven or the 70s prog rock heaven, and many of the songs on the Lamb are pretty meldodic and catchy (like It, the Carpet Crawlers, Lilywhite Lilith, Antway, Cuckoo cocoon) I am pretty sure many of those songs have influenced modern pop music.
 
the melody of It is very infectious melodie  


-------------


Posted By: sigod
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 17:14
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by sigod sigod wrote:

[QUOTE=Blacksword] I guess he just prefers performing Motown music. I quite like Motown, but when Collins re-works those old classics, it just doesn't work for me at all. They are pale and weak immitations of how that music should be performed and produced.


Good to see you on here again Simon. Hope all is well sir.

Fine and dandy mate. Still fighting the good fight I see. Big smile


-------------
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill


Posted By: darksideof
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 21:02
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

After all he said in the 80's and 90's, I don't believe him.

His contradictions already posted of past threads are legendary.

Iván
well he isn't perfect!Embarrassed


-------------
http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/
http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 21:22
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Oh well, more Phil bashing.

Lest we forget, he was the drummer in one of the all time (some say ALL TIME) greatest prog bands of all time, and was, latterly, the singer and a writer. In other words, an integral part of the band, not a bit part player.

Why the hell wouldn't he be proud of this song and of his band?

It's not bashing, is remembering the history.

He said that he never understood The Lamb (when his pop stuff was at the peak) and years later when his pop Genesis was dead he said The Lamb was his favorite album.

He said in Genesis a History that he was happy when Punk came, shake the tree and all the bands fell like bad apples (SIC), then years later he says he's proud of what they did on the early days.

He auditioned for Yes and wasn't accepted (Yes lost), then he said clearly that he never liked Yes and now says that Yes musicians are virtuoso.

Bashing would be insulting him, remembering what he said and how critic he was about Prog and now he wants to gain old fans again.

Iván




-------------
            


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 21:33
Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

 

Nobody ever liked Genesis. They have ever had poor album sales untill Selling England, which sold about 100k in the UK, being that the only place with significant album sales by that band. They took 8/9 years to have their breakthough album and from it they went downhill, so I guess he's right.

Seems you don't know about Italy and Belgium,Trespass was N° 1 in Belgium, Nursery Cryme was N N° 4 in Italy and Foxtrot was N° 1 in Italy.

So UK was not the only place with significant sales in the world.

Iván

BTW: Genesis Live (released before SEBTP) was in the charts of UK, keeping N° 9 for 10 weeks


-------------
            


Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 21:40
Indifferent to what Phil says, he's the best, Of course he was better as a solo artist, but he doesn't deny his participation in Genesis and even has positive remarks on it. So God bless Phill.

-------------
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT


Posted By: darksideof
Date Posted: October 27 2010 at 21:51
is it true all this stuff you guys are writing about Phill? I am a pretty huge Genesis fan since I was 14 Years. I had never read numerous and I even have few Genesis Documentary  on videos Have a Genesis  boigraphy and I still haven''t ready anything Phil said bashing early Genesis prog  albums. Totally the opossite.
can you guys post the link of these interviews?
ohh the only think I remember he said was that they were tired of playing long songs and old songs. That The band needed to change their  direction. that all!


-------------
http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/
http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: October 28 2010 at 00:58
Originally posted by darksideof darksideof wrote:

is it true all this stuff you guys are writing about Phill? I am a pretty huge Genesis fan since I was 14 Years. I had never read numerous and I even have few Genesis Documentary  on videos Have a Genesis  boigraphy and I still haven''t ready anything Phil said bashing early Genesis prog  albums. Totally the opossite.
can you guys post the link of these interviews?
ohh the only think I remember he said was that they were tired of playing long songs and old songs. That The band needed to change their  direction. that all!

Most of this interviews are very old and no longer available, for example the first Genesis and Phil Collins sites  has been transformed and several interviews vanished.

Only found one quotes:

Quote  You put Genesis over there in a corner with Yes, ELP, Moody Blues and the Floyd (Pink Floyd) because that`s the period we happened to come up in. I don`t like any of those groups - so it angers me and frustrates me when we get compared to them.

http://www.whosdatedwho.com/celebrity/quotes/phil-collins.htm - http://www.whosdatedwho.com/celebrity/quotes/phil-collins.htm

I believe you will find several good opinions about Yes after 2000.

But if you want to listen some of his most acid perception about Genesis and Prog, you can get "GENESIS A HISTORY" DVD...There he speaks a lot of harsh things about Prog and old Genesis.

Iván

BTW: I can correct myself when I found something I was wrong, seems that Phil always had a soft spot for Supper's Ready and specially for Apocalypse in 9/8, but he has said some very hard things.


-------------
            


Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: October 28 2010 at 01:03
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

 

Nobody ever liked Genesis. They have ever had poor album sales untill Selling England, which sold about 100k in the UK, being that the only place with significant album sales by that band. They took 8/9 years to have their breakthough album and from it they went downhill, so I guess he's right.

Seems you don't know about Italy and Belgium,Trespass was N° 1 in Belgium, Nursery Cryme was N N° 4 in Italy and Foxtrot was N° 1 in Italy.

So UK was not the only place with significant sales in the world.

Iván

BTW: Genesis Live (released before SEBTP) was in the charts of UK, keeping N° 9 for 10 weeks
 
I knew through PA that Genesis were more popular in Italy than in UK but never knew how much popular were they. Thanks for the info! Trespass being Nº1 in a country makes me smile.


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: October 28 2010 at 06:35
I accept the possibility that in hindsight he may have come around and changed his attitude to the old Genesis stuff, but in an interview for a Genesis retrospective, back when they were in their pop phase, all of the notorious three were very dismissive to the old fans.   I can kind of understand it because a lot of old fans were dismissive of the newer Genesis stuff.  I took an interest in the band right after Hackett left and stayed with them for a while, getting their new albums, but eventually got tired of them.  I never got the Mama album and Invisible Touch would be last one I would get when it first came out.  To date I've only replaced my vinyls up to and including Abacab.  I did try Calling All Stations, but only because the CDs are available really cheap.

-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: CCVP
Date Posted: October 28 2010 at 07:05
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

 

Nobody ever liked Genesis. They have ever had poor album sales untill Selling England, which sold about 100k in the UK, being that the only place with significant album sales by that band. They took 8/9 years to have their breakthough album and from it they went downhill, so I guess he's right.

Seems you don't know about Italy and Belgium,Trespass was N° 1 in Belgium, Nursery Cryme was N N° 4 in Italy and Foxtrot was N° 1 in Italy.

So UK was not the only place with significant sales in the world.

Iván

BTW: Genesis Live (released before SEBTP) was in the charts of UK, keeping N° 9 for 10 weeks
Yes, I knew that Iván, but for some reason selling 100k copies in the UK surpassed all of their album sales combined at the time. Same with Trick of the Tail selling 500k in the US. Hmm, for some reason I think the US and the UK album sales are more significant than all the countries you pointed. People simply buy more records there, period.
 
Hell, Dream Theater charted amongst the 10 bes selling artists in many many countries of the world when Black Clouds was releasd and they weren't even able to sell 1m albums world wide. Actually, I domn't even think they sold 500k, but anyway, Genesis simply could not sell albums during their prime man, deal with it. Very few bands can, there is no problem with it.
 
Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:

^ Hell, I still don't like Genesis nearly as much as the other bands that were around at the time. If you want an example of a prog act that was actually really well-known while they were still being innovative, look no further than Yes, ''The people's band''. 
 
Same with me, their so-called "acclaimed" prog releases are'nt my cup of tea also, though i really really LOVE TResspass and Nursery Crime. ELP also sold millions upon millions back in the day (even more than Yes I think), both rightfully.


-------------


Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: October 28 2010 at 07:20
I don't care what he says,people can change their opinions, even Phil is allowed too. I just feel so sorry for the guy having to strap his sticks to his hands so he can play. No musician deserves this fate.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: sigod
Date Posted: October 28 2010 at 09:13
Are you sure?
 
 


-------------
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill


Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: October 28 2010 at 09:18
Originally posted by sigod sigod wrote:

Are you sure?
 
 

OK some musicians do.LOL


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: TODDLER
Date Posted: October 28 2010 at 11:16
He has often stated in the past that punk rockers would damn the early music of Genesis rambling on about how bands of this nature are a bunch of old farts. He claimed that he was personally agreeable when they made their references to Pink Floyd but felt deeply about the fact that Genesis had something special to offer in those days. Phil Collins would sometimes himself make negative and cruel thrusts towards the early prog days of Genesis. Much in the way that Rutherford did. "Oh! we couldn't wait until it was over" or "Thank God those days are gone". It sounds like a love/hate relationship between Collins and prog as when people cut on the early Genesis, he starts defending it! He probably hated the turmoil and struggle in the business during those prog days as it was much easier to rack in astronomical amounts of profit with the 80's Genesis.

I feel sorry for him if he is tormented over the reality of what he was in the Brand X and early Genesis days when compared to his current media activity over the last few decades. Singing or writing a song for the TARZAN movie was the old adult musician singer songwriter approach to children's workshops. It's almost as if you could imagine him on Sesame Street. It's healthy do do this but, not if deep down inside you are avoiding your past with an attitude. His participation in a Buddy Rich tribute was a great idea for him to stretch out as a player again. He might miss the extreme progressiveness of his career in the sense that his pop indulgence was to the opposite extreme. Now he is getting older and he is looking back you see? However I did not understand the attitude he presented in Progression Magazine in 2004 when he was interviewed by Nick Tate. He responded at one point by saying Well, the question is how does Peter Gabriel feel about performing "Invisible Touch"? In otherwords, don't worry about how I, Tony and Mike feel about returning to our prog roots because we have no intentions of bending. They must have had a kind of bond in the business sense and their past issues with the early Genesis were still bitter to a great degree. That was the impression I got. But, he is not all one sided and somewhere inside he may feel some kind of regret for turning his back on it. That vibe seems to surface when he defends the early days. Perhaps he is struggling with that reality?


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: October 28 2010 at 21:17
^^^^^

I think that is probably closer to the truth.  They did carry on with prog for two years after Gabriel left and Collins has some songwriting credits on the two albums with Hackett (before ATTWT) so he was in all probability attached to the music they were making at the time but found it more and more difficult to mount the effort to make it, faced with dwindling returns for prog as such.  I have also read  Rutherford saying in the notorious Annotated Lamb Lies...article that they were in great touch at the time of making that album and the music just flowed.  Banks and Rutherford regard Lamb as a commercial failure, so it is possible that the sum total of the efforts they put into it, Gabriel's departure, lack of commercial success and getting branded as pretentious affected them.  In my personal experience too, Genesis is the hardest of the big five bands to get people from outside prog circles to understand because they are only too inclined to dismiss Genesis's prog albums as precious, sissy pop (the irony!) and don't really perceive its brilliance, not right away at any rate. People generally regard prog as weird or strange music and Genesis seem to dampen those misplaced expectations. 


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 04:17
Originally posted by sigod sigod wrote:


Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by sigod sigod wrote:

[QUOTE=Blacksword] I guess he just prefers performing Motown music. I quite like Motown, but when Collins re-works those old classics, it just doesn't work for me at all. They are pale and weak immitations of how that music should be performed and produced.


Good to see you on here again Simon. Hope all is well sir.
Fine and dandy mate. Still fighting the good fight I see. Big smile


Man's gotta have a hobby..

-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: Evolver
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 06:26
Okay.  We have now slammed Phil Collins for his remarks about prog. And rightly so.
 
Why is Fripp always let off the hook for all of his "dinosaurs" references back in the late seventies?


-------------
Trust me. I know what I'm doing.


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 06:30
Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

Okay.  We have now slammed Phil Collins for his remarks about prog. And rightly so.
 
Why is Fripp always let off the hook for all of his "dinosaurs" references back in the late seventies?

Because Fripp still makes good music. LOL


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 06:36
Indeed, Fripp never sold his soul to soul...

Collins deserves a 'ribbing' for making a catalogue of diabolical tacky fake motown music in the 80's, but generally I have no ill feeling towards him. He's among my favourite prog musicians, and was a key member of my all time favourite prog band. I cope with his solo efforts by not listening to it.

I've said it before, but his perspective on the band he was in is bound to change with age. It's a natural thing for a musician to go through.

-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 07:07
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

but his perspective on the band he was in is bound to change with age. It's a natural thing for a musician to go through.


Absolutely - ask Steve Wilson why he never plays 'The Sky Moves Sideways' or 'Radioactive Toy' anymore (I'd stand back when you ask though ); musicians change...

-------------

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 07:14
Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

but his perspective on the band he was in is bound to change with age. It's a natural thing for a musician to go through.


Absolutely - ask Steve Wilson why he never plays 'The Sky Moves Sideways' or 'Radioactive Toy' anymore (I'd stand back when you ask though ); musicians change...


Indeed, and Wilsons take on the whole 'prog' tag seems to have mellowed with time too. But, then I bet many prog musicians go through a naieve phase of believing their music is completely beyond any classification.



-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 07:19
Back to PC's original quote though - this is a classic example of why Collins should retain respect:



-------------

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012


Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 07:24
And another (they really should clean this old film up & release properly):



Fpor me, his 1970's brilliance overshadow's his later crimes against music (so, like Blacksword I just pretend his solo albums don't exist)

-------------

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 07:41
Can't watch vid clips at work.. I'll check out when I get home.

Face Value is listenable, but No Jacket Required is best enjoyed in a concrete bunker, roughly 70 miles from ground zero where some flop haired 80's yuppie is playing it.

-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 07:45
I actually enjoy Face Value, Its very good. But to no fault of Phil's I do not really share his musical taste after this. I think what he did, he did very well though. I totally respect him for following his path. I sometimes think he said some stupid things.....but don't we all!

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: darksideof
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 09:22
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by darksideof darksideof wrote:

is it true all this stuff you guys are writing about Phill? I am a pretty huge Genesis fan since I was 14 Years. I had never read numerous and I even have few Genesis Documentary  on videos Have a Genesis  boigraphy and I still haven''t ready anything Phil said bashing early Genesis prog  albums. Totally the opossite.
can you guys post the link of these interviews?
ohh the only think I remember he said was that they were tired of playing long songs and old songs. That The band needed to change their  direction. that all!

Most of this interviews are very old and no longer available, for example the first Genesis and Phil Collins sites  has been transformed and several interviews vanished.

Only found one quotes:

Quote  You put Genesis over there in a corner with Yes, ELP, Moody Blues and the Floyd (Pink Floyd) because that`s the period we happened to come up in. I don`t like any of those groups - so it angers me and frustrates me when we get compared to them.

http://www.whosdatedwho.com/celebrity/quotes/phil-collins.htm - http://www.whosdatedwho.com/celebrity/quotes/phil-collins.htm

I believe you will find several good opinions about Yes after 2000.

But if you want to listen some of his most acid perception about Genesis and Prog, you can get "GENESIS A HISTORY" DVD...There he speaks a lot of harsh things about Prog and old Genesis.

Iván

BTW: I can correct myself when I found something I was wrong, seems that Phil always had a soft spot for Supper's Ready and specially for Apocalypse in 9/8, but he has said some very hard things.

Cry wow!!!


-------------
http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/
http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/


Posted By: darksideof
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 09:39
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

but his perspective on the band he was in is bound to change with age. It's a natural thing for a musician to go through.


Absolutely - ask Steve Wilson why he never plays 'The Sky Moves Sideways' or 'Radioactive Toy' anymore (I'd stand back when you ask though ); musicians change...


Indeed, and Wilsons take on the whole 'prog' tag seems to have mellowed with time too. But, then I bet many prog musicians go through a naieve phase of believing their music is completely beyond any classification.

I agree 100% on that. I remember in the early 90's how much Steve hated when Pt was called a "prog band" look at him embracing the whole genre and maybe adoring it.LOL
Radiohead is next.Wink


-------------
http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/
http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 10:16
Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Back to PC's original quote though - this is a classic example of why Collins should retain respect:


Honestly...I can't stand this version, Phil's voice is flat and boring.

Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: Garion81
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 10:59
That was the first tour that I saw the band 1976 in a little used outdoor theater called the Starlight Amphitheater in the hills of Burbank ,California.  I will always love that version because it is one of two times I was fortunate to hear it live (the second and last being the next year) Of course Phil was no villain then in fact he was kind of a Saviour keeping the group together. 

 Hmm lets see that Phil gets called out for his comments over and over in the late 70's and early 80's and yet he was the one that sat in with the Musical Box playing the Musical Box a few years ago and certainly was no road block to, in fact encouraged a full reunion tour 3-4 years ago.  It is pretty obvious he does not hate the music of his youth now.  Whether that extends to ELP, Yes, Pink Floyd etc is irrelevant. 


-------------


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 11:08
Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Back to PC's original quote though - this is a classic example of why Collins should retain respect:



Oh yes, I have seen both clips and love the performances.

The mans contribution to prog rock generally is fantastic. Lets not forget Brand X, his work with Gabriel, Brian Eno, and on the first Hackett solo album. I think the the collins of the 80's was an imposter...

-------------
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!


Posted By: esky
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 18:58
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

Yeah, close study of Phil Collins will suggest the guy is very calculating. He knows that history treats his prog output much kinder than his pop output. I wouldn't put it past him for that to be a disingenuous answer in order to make critics and the old guard feel more kindly towards him.
 
This old guard feels kindly towards him regardless. When you've done what he'd done in his former band's peak years with Brand X on top of that, why would you give diddly what anyone else says. Now if Phil can only hold a wife (that's the real trick).


Posted By: Chris S
Date Posted: October 29 2010 at 19:02
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Back to PC's original quote though - this is a classic example of why Collins should retain respect:


Honestly...I can't stand this version, Phil's voice is flat and boring.

Iván
Almost as good as the originalClap. I would go one step further and say that Second's Out knocks the socks off Live IMHO

-------------
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]


Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: October 30 2010 at 08:34
^ Absolutely agree. The first boxset is the definitive live set of that era, whilst Seconds Out is a definitive live album full stop.

-------------
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!


Posted By: Norman Kiddie
Date Posted: November 03 2010 at 13:27
SmileWell said LAZLAND, he was not only a drummer but an integral part of progressive rock history.
I feel he did a great job of filling an unfillable role after Gabriel left. He gave us The Trick and Wind & Wuthering. The rest was never my thing and probably never will be. I´ll take the memories, be proud of the fact that I was lucky enough to see Phil and Pete lay down their Supper´s Ready for generations to come.
We would be fools to underestimate just how good Phil Collins was. The drums on Selling England are
sensational and being a Brand X fan have never been fool enough to rub this man´s nose in the dirt.
Phil failed to capture his progressive fab club´s fascination with his more commercial adventures, but if
we are honest he gave a totally different audience years of enjoyable sing along pop.
I am sure Phil Collins has an incredible amount of respect fro his former band members and that Supper´s Ready is his favourite.
Norm
 


Posted By: Intruder
Date Posted: November 03 2010 at 18:57

I don't think that anyone is refuting Phil's influence and place in prog history.  I think people are offended that he threw the genre under the proverbial bus when he was on top of his game saleswise.  Anything for a sale....anything for attention, the guy's always been starved for it.  That's the reason for his comments on Supper's Ready....the re-remasters are due soon and Phil the Shill is out to sell us yet another copy of Foxtrot.

Never claimed that Phil didn't have the music in him.....just annoyed that he denies his legacy in favor of Soo-soo-psudo Motown trash.  I remember the scared little rat on the Arsenio show covering his tracks after the "dark" comment on the Grammy awards show in the mid-90s.  He also went on Leno and kissed arse....anything for sales. 


-------------
I like to feel the suspense when you're certain you know I am there.....


Posted By: infandous
Date Posted: November 04 2010 at 14:28
Well, I gotta say that Seconds Out is possibly the most boring live album I've ever heard, and I love 70's Genesis.  Live is far better, with the Rainbow 73 show surpassing even that.  I've never cared for Collins singing the Gabriel stuff, though he does make a valiant effort to sound like PG.  Seconds Out just lacks any energy or excitement whatsoever.  The 1976 recording is much better, but still a step below Live and Rainbow 73.

As to Phil's comment, good for him, I agree completely ClapWink




Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: November 04 2010 at 19:02
Originally posted by Intruder Intruder wrote:

I don't think that anyone is refuting Phil's influence and place in prog history.  I think people are offended that he threw the genre under the proverbial bus when he was on top of his game saleswise. 



I don't think it was so much a matter of being thrown under the bus as being peed on. LOL


-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: RoyFairbank
Date Posted: November 04 2010 at 21:00
Collins has won my respect as a musician. I think he puts a good amount of thought and respect into all of his music. He is very genuine. You can hear it in Trick of A Tail, and you can hear it in Both Sides, you can hear it in Invisible Touch and you can hear it in No Jacket Required.

I like his attitude and am comfortable with his decisions. I see what's great in Invisible Touch alongside what is drab or awful. Similarly, I appreciate even his least proggy endeavors, like his new album, Going Back, which is a very fun album.

Edit: As a note, compare to the boring pretentiousness of Peter Gabriel, who has not lot to say but a lot of props to say it with.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk