Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics not related to music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=70575 Printed Date: February 17 2025 at 19:06 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: What type of forum poster are you?Posted By: Slartibartfast
Subject: What type of forum poster are you?
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 07:09
I seem to be seeing an increase in posts with humor. If I've been being a bad influence I apologize. Personally I love seeing humor in posting. How about you?
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Replies: Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 07:12
You're always silly
I'm just occasionally silly.
Posted By: progkidjoel
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 07:14
Poster child seems appropriate given my post count and user name.
Also, this reminds me of Ben's http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=69641 - PA member typology.
-------------
Posted By: Vompatti
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 07:15
Always silly. (Except now. )
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 07:24
It also occurred to me that we also may have some folks who stick to the prog music forums, stick to the non music forums, and just stick to the music. I don't suppose we'll be hearing from people who stay away from polls like the plague.
My favorite poll type are those that ask you to choose between two different things that are unrelated and make you go "what the hell? I dunno?".
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Posted By: June
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 09:44
Define "poster child" though (I know that's not me, I barely ever post in the prog sections, but I'm curious about what I'd have to do if I ever wanted to be one)
Posted By: dtd350
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 09:51
I am serious most of the time but I don't post alot yet because I only post on stuff that I know about and I am still learning alot so why should I post if I don't know what I am talking about...LOL.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/dtd350
Posted By: SaltyJon
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 09:51
Posted By: WalterDigsTunes
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 16:11
Silence, post-89 hack.
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 16:12
Thank god I'm a pre 89 hero! My poor brother though.... Great musical taste and awesome bassist but he was born in '91 so guess hes doomed to be a talentless child
Posted By: WalterDigsTunes
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 16:13
JJLehto wrote:
Thank god I'm a pre 89 hero! My poor brother though.... Great musical taste and awesome bassist but he was born in '91 so guess hes doomed to be a talentless child
Its not about birth date, its about recorded music. Any post-89 buffoon that dares sully the legacy of the dead art known as music by making facile imitations of it must be prosecuted for crimes against culture.
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 16:14
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Silence, post-89 hack.
I was making my own music at three-years-old, thank you very much.
Posted By: SaltyJon
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 16:15
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
Thank god I'm a pre 89 hero! My poor brother though.... Great musical taste and awesome bassist but he was born in '91 so guess hes doomed to be a talentless child
Its not about birth date, its about recorded music. Any post-89 buffoon that dares sully the legacy of the dead art known as music by making facile imitations of it must be prosecuted for crimes against culture.
So you're saying that a band who was founded post-89 but only plays live and doesn't record anything is alright?
No albums until 2009? Shameful. Do stop and let real musicians do their thing. This goes to you and every other debaser of the defunct art.
Thats a bit low.
Yeah, one thing is trying to be annoying, the other is just offensive. Though knowing Robert quite well, I doubt he would be offended by a post-89 user hack.
Posted By: jampa17
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 16:33
harmonium.ro wrote:
You're always silly
I'm just occasionally silly.
Alex is right Slarti... I tend to be silly but I'm able to be serious... you just need to see me in religious/DT threads...
-------------
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 18:49
Any Colour You Like wrote:
Walter, you just get better with each post. That truly is an artform.
Although, I liked your pre-2010 posts better, they were more subtle and original.
Say NO! to post-2010 Walter, it's shamelessly derivative and unoriginal
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 18:52
Triceratopsoil wrote:
Any Colour You Like wrote:
Walter, you just get better with each post. That truly is an artform.
Although, I liked your pre-2010 posts better, they were more subtle and original.
Say NO! to post-2010 Walter, it's shamelessly derivative and unoriginal
Indeed. Say YES to pre-2010 Walter posts!
Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 19:03
Triceratopsoil wrote:
Any Colour You Like wrote:
Walter, you just get better with each post. That truly is an artform.
Although, I liked your pre-2010 posts better, they were more subtle and original.
Say NO! to post-2010 Walter, it's shamelessly derivative and unoriginal
Yeah, it seem like a POP-Walter rather than a Prog-Walter.
Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 20:31
I refuse to answer on the grounds that I might incriminate m
and I'll add the option Other to that, instead of yself
which gives --- I refuse to answer on the grounds that I might incriminate mother
I'm always seriously silly, but not always, sometimes I'm moderatly silly othertimes I get moderated for being silly, or overtly serious.
Posted By: himtroy
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 22:16
I'm pretty non serious in all my posts, and often times people bother me and I'll say anything just to get them pissed at me. Which often leads to a lot of people thinking I believe things I truly don't. But I usually contribute as well, even though you can find some purely annoying posts of mind that contributed nothing but other's anger.
I was also trying to get way too many people to check out my song a while ago (hey, check out the song, its in my sig).
------------- Which of you to gain me, tell, will risk uncertain pains of hell?
I will not forgive you if you will not take the chance.
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 22 2010 at 22:19
The Quiet One wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
Any Colour You Like wrote:
Walter, you just get better with each post. That truly is an artform.
Although, I liked your pre-2010 posts better, they were more subtle and original.
Say NO! to post-2010 Walter, it's shamelessly derivative and unoriginal
Yeah, it seem like a POP-Walter rather than a Prog-Walter.
Where is our hero of the pre-89 heroes? Has he sold out to the man with his generic posts?
Posted By: progkidjoel
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 01:45
JJLehto wrote:
The Quiet One wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
Any Colour You Like wrote:
Walter, you just get better with each post. That truly is an artform.
Although, I liked your pre-2010 posts better, they were more subtle and original.
Say NO! to post-2010 Walter, it's shamelessly derivative and unoriginal
Yeah, it seem like a POP-Walter rather than a Prog-Walter.
Where is our hero of the pre-89 heroes? Has he sold out to the man with his generic posts?
I remember when Walter was cool; now he's just repeating himself. A very non-prog attitude for such a clever man indeed.
-------------
Posted By: WalterDigsTunes
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 01:46
progkidjoel wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
The Quiet One wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
Any Colour You Like wrote:
Walter, you just get better with each post. That truly is an artform.
Although, I liked your pre-2010 posts better, they were more subtle and original.
Say NO! to post-2010 Walter, it's shamelessly derivative and unoriginal
Yeah, it seem like a POP-Walter rather than a Prog-Walter.
Where is our hero of the pre-89 heroes? Has he sold out to the man with his generic posts?
I remember when Walter was cool; now he's just repeating himself. A very non-prog attitude for such a clever man indeed.
New music isn't progressive at all; its derivative junk that needs to be weeded out of PA. The sooner we do it, the better.
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 01:48
LOL music wasn't even involved in that chain of quotes
Posted By: progkidjoel
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 01:50
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
progkidjoel wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
The Quiet One wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
Any Colour You Like wrote:
Walter, you just get better with each post. That truly is an artform.
Although, I liked your pre-2010 posts better, they were more subtle and original.
Say NO! to post-2010 Walter, it's shamelessly derivative and unoriginal
Yeah, it seem like a POP-Walter rather than a Prog-Walter.
Where is our hero of the pre-89 heroes? Has he sold out to the man with his generic posts?
I remember when Walter was cool; now he's just repeating himself. A very non-prog attitude for such a clever man indeed.
New music isn't progressive at all; its derivative junk that needs to be weeded out of PA. The sooner we do it, the better.
Your posts aren't progressive at all; they're derivative junk that need to be weeded out of PA. The sooner we do it, the better.
-------------
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 01:50
progkidjoel wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
progkidjoel wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
The Quiet One wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
Any Colour You Like wrote:
Walter, you just get better with each post. That truly is an artform.
Although, I liked your pre-2010 posts better, they were more subtle and original.
Say NO! to post-2010 Walter, it's shamelessly derivative and unoriginal
Yeah, it seem like a POP-Walter rather than a Prog-Walter.
Where is our hero of the pre-89 heroes? Has he sold out to the man with his generic posts?
I remember when Walter was cool; now he's just repeating himself. A very non-prog attitude for such a clever man indeed.
New music isn't progressive at all; its derivative junk that needs to be weeded out of PA. The sooner we do it, the better.
Your posts aren't progressive at all; they're derivative junk that need to be weeded out of PA. The sooner we do it, the better.
Posted By: The Sleepwalker
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 06:15
They are right, Walter. You're posts used to annoy me a tad, but lately your posts are just repetitive nonsense only serving as a waste of space. Like others already mentioned, there is no progression at all. Maybe, Walter (this is just a suggestion), it's time to take a look at some other posters that are known to irritate people and draw some influence from them.
-------------
Posted By: someone_else
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 06:25
Epignosis wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Silence, post-89 hack.
I was making my own music at three-years-old, thank you very much.
Rehearsing in a bath tub for a debut album called Stir the Waters, I suppose .
Edit: By the way, my posts are occasionally silly.
-------------
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 06:34
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
progkidjoel wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
The Quiet One wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
Any Colour You Like wrote:
Walter, you just get better with each post. That truly is an artform.
Although, I liked your pre-2010 posts better, they were more subtle and original.
Say NO! to post-2010 Walter, it's shamelessly derivative and unoriginal
Yeah, it seem like a POP-Walter rather than a Prog-Walter.
Where is our hero of the pre-89 heroes? Has he sold out to the man with his generic posts?
I remember when Walter was cool; now he's just repeating himself. A very non-prog attitude for such a clever man indeed.
New music isn't progressive at all; its derivative junk that needs to be weeded out of PA. The sooner we do it, the better.
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 12:29
You all suck.
I suck even a little more.
That's it. That's PA.
-------------
Posted By: Rabid
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 18:55
Good thread, Slarti......let's clear the air.
VERY Often silly, but capable of being deadly serious. I like to laugh, and I like to laugh with people who share my sense of humour. But then again, humour is as subjective and individual as music....not everyone appreciates the same things. One thing I have noticed about PA, tho....I've yet to find a truly malicious member, and that's a rarity, in this day and age.
I've got a twisted sense of humour.
If I ever get up anyones nose, I'd prefer to be told, rather than let things get out of hand.
I don't get any kicks out of deliberately winding people up, but I'm not afraid to voice my true opinions, either.
If I'm being jokey, or agreeable, I use or or or or
If I'm truly pissed, I'll use or or or or
If I'm wrecked, I use , but I'd NEVER consider using , under ANY circumstances.
Maybe we need MORE emoticons.
------------- "...the thing IS, to put a motor in yourself..."
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 19:10
Posted By: Rabid
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 19:24
himtroy wrote:
I'm pretty non serious in all my posts, and often times people bother me and I'll say anything just to get them pissed at me. Which often leads to a lot of people thinking I believe things I truly don't. But I usually contribute as well, even though you can find some purely annoying posts of mind that contributed nothing but other's anger.
I was also trying to get way too many people to check out my song a while ago (hey, check out the song, its in my sig).
Why don't you use a hyper-link to your song, in your sig?
------------- "...the thing IS, to put a motor in yourself..."
Posted By: Rabid
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 19:26
JJLehto wrote:
------------- "...the thing IS, to put a motor in yourself..."
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 19:26
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 19:50
Rabid wrote:
but I'd NEVER consider using , under ANY circumstances.
Now that you mentioned it, I haven't seen used anywhere here, not even when discussing pork.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Posted By: Rabid
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 19:51
JJLehto wrote:
------------- "...the thing IS, to put a motor in yourself..."
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 19:53
If anyone wants to know what kind of poster I am...I think you know now
Posted By: Rabid
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 19:54
Slartibartfast wrote:
Rabid wrote:
but I'd NEVER consider using , under ANY circumstances.
Now that you mentioned it, I haven't seen used anywhere here, not even when discussing pork.
Can't you go back and edit your 'pulled pork' post in 'Prog Chefs Unite'? That's a golden opportunity !!!
------------- "...the thing IS, to put a motor in yourself..."
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 19:54
I love this collaborative effort that sometimes goes on: the pyramid builders.
I feel this thread in extreme danger of sliding down into Just For Fun. And...and....and...I've come to terms with that, well kind of. (don't ask me about that, I've just never used it yet)
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 20:06
>^..^<
Posted By: Rabid
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 20:08
Slartibartfast wrote:
I love this collaborative effort that sometimes goes on: the pyramid builders.
I feel this thread in extreme danger of sliding down into Just For Fun. And...and....and...I've come to terms with that, well kind of. (don't ask me about that, I've just never used it yet)
Use that one for Walter, for sticking to his guns !
------------- "...the thing IS, to put a motor in yourself..."
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 20:09
Say NO to post 1970 hacks Say YES to pre 1970 musical heroes!
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 21:39
Things that are not serious business:
1. Progressive rock 2. Politics 3. Religion 4. Member drama 5. You 6. Post-89 hacks 7. Serious cat (please you step into my office now)
Things that are serious business:
1. Tangerine Dream
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 23 2010 at 21:40
SERIOUS CAT IS NOT SERIOUS BUSINESS?
Posted By: npjnpj
Date Posted: August 24 2010 at 07:59
I refuse to answer on the grounds that I might incriminate mOther?
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: August 24 2010 at 08:04
Where's 'Often serious but capable of being silly'??
------------- Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: August 24 2010 at 17:13
Jim Garten wrote:
Where's 'Often serious but capable of being silly'??
If you have really been paying attention, most PA members that are often serious are incapable of being silly...
-------------
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 13:38
Who said something about pissing folks off?
Rush Sucks!
Naw, I've done that one too much. Iron Maiden's new album is rotten garbage by old men with no soul!
Eh, I'm trying too hard to not tr hard enough.
My favorite word is "fa****". I don't even have anything against homosexuals, I just absolutely love the word.
Anywho, I used to be a serious poster, now I'm a poster, seriously. Anyone who's read my new reviews knows what sort of poster I am (a big dicked one) mhm.
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 13:59
And with Alitare at least we all know where he stands.
Not one of those "is he trying to do that?" deals
So people that are upset by him really should not be, pretty obvious what poster you are Dustin. Unless all of that IS a facade by you...in which case you've bested all of us!
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 14:17
JJLehto wrote:
And with Alitare at least we all know where he stands.
Not one of those "is he trying to do that?" deals
So people that are upset by him really should not be, pretty obvious what poster you are Dustin. Unless all of that IS a facade by you...in which case you've bested all of us!
I want to upset people. It's strange. Like, what I say upsets folks a lot. I want that, not because I wana upset folks, but because it's entertaining to see folks be upset when I am not intending them to be upset.
Errr, that's complicated. I WANT people to be upset by what I say, but it's not my INTENTION. My goal is for people to get upset by words that I say that aren't meant to upset.
Holy hell. My head can't take it, no more! Here's a penis joke!
What did the penis say to the mailman?
how do you get aHEAD?! Ahahaha! Get it? The penis lives in a residential area by which he can obtain mail!
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 14:19
I enjoy upsetting people, mainly for their reactions. I assume Im a sick person
And do need all that Dustin? Your sig may do all the work on its own
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: September 05 2010 at 07:04
Alitare wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
And with Alitare at least we all know where he stands.
Not one of those "is he trying to do that?" deals
So people that are upset by him really should not be, pretty obvious what poster you are Dustin. Unless all of that IS a facade by you...in which case you've bested all of us!
I want to upset people. It's strange. Like, what I say upsets folks a lot. I want that, not because I wana upset folks, but because it's entertaining to see folks be upset when I am not intending them to be upset.
Errr, that's complicated. I WANT people to be upset by what I say, but it's not my INTENTION. My goal is for people to get upset by words that I say that aren't meant to upset.
Holy hell. My head can't take it, no more! Here's a penis joke!
What did the penis say to the mailman?
how do you get aHEAD?! Ahahaha! Get it? The penis lives in a residential area by which he can obtain mail!
Save those keystrokes Alitare: POLEMIC (with the added bonus of a 'shaft' related gag to boot )