< name="Title" ="">
< name="Keywords" ="">
< ="-" ="text/; =utf-8">
< name="ProgId" ="Word.">
< name="Generator" ="Microsoft Word 11">
< name="Originator" ="Microsoft Word 11">
file://localhost/Users/espenhagerup/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/msoclip1/01/clip_filelist.xml -
file://localhost/Users/espenhagerup/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/msoclip1/01/clip_filelist.xml - My
apologies for this very long and rather self-centred post.
file://localhost/Users/espenhagerup/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/msoclip1/01/clip_filelist.xml -
file://localhost/Users/espenhagerup/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/msoclip1/01/clip_filelist.xml - To start
with one of your simpler questions: I cannot know what book your teacher
recommended, but it may have been Principles of Orchestration file://localhost/Users/espenhagerup/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/msoclip1/01/clip_filelist.xml - by Rimsky-Korsakov. You can also
find a lot of resources on the Internet. An article like this one answers
another of your questions:
file://localhost/Users/espenhagerup/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/msoclip1/01/clip_filelist.xml -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_horn - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_horn
NB! Like
many other wind instruments (clarinets, saxophones, trumpets etc.), the French
horn is a transposing instrument. If you use MIDI files, that doesn’t make any
difference. But if you use real instruments (which of course is better if you
have the right musicians at hand), you must know how to transpose. If you write
a piece in C major for a horn in Bb, you need two sharps, and a written D will
sound like a C.
I don’t
play the violin, but my experience is that you should be a little cautious when
it comes to double stops (playing two notes at a time). I once played in a band
with a violinist, and she wasn’t very happy with fifths. Thirds, fourths and
sixths are apparently easier due to the tuning of the instrument (it’s tuned in
fifths: G, D, A and E).
It’s not
easy to write idiomatically for the guitar unless you play the instrument
yourself, and even the best guitarists have their limitations. My best advice is
to buy a cheap guitar and learn to play. I don’t know where you live, but in
Norway you can get an excellent beginner’s guitar for less than 200 dollars.
The normal tuning is E, A, D, G, B and E. (Keep in mind that classical [nylon
string], steel string, 12-string and electric guitars are different instruments
and must be treated differently.)
I’m afraid
I don’t know much about percussion. Again, check Wikipedia and other resources
on the Internet.
Musical
form (open the links in the article):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical_form - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical_form
Inspiration
is a problematic word. I may find inspiration in the orange baby lizard I saw
two days ago. And then again, maybe not.
Earlier, I
nearly always made the music after the lyrics were written, but then I didn’t
write the lyrics myself. Now it’s often (but not always) the other way around,
or I work on the words and the music at the same time. In a few instances I’ve
even written new lyrics to old songs, and once I made a song while I was
asleep. The lyrics are by Catullus, so they were definitely made before the
music, but it was remarkable that I remembered the music when I woke up. The
result is here:
http://www.supload.com/listen?s=cxKRbw - http://www.supload.com/listen?s=cxKRbw
Most of my
main ideas stem from improvisation (though no improvisation is really free;
you’re always guided by your skills and knowledge, for better or worse).
However, composing isn’t only about ideas, it’s just as much about what you do
with your ideas to achieve the result you want. Personally I spend a lot of
time writing notes, following the rules (or, rather, guidelines) of
counterpoint where I find it fit and breaking them if I think it creates a more
pleasant or interesting effect. In studio I often try different
instrumentations — if for instance a flute is hardly audible, I can try an oboe
instead, or maybe double it with a clarinet.
Forgive me
for droning on about myself — and shamelessly promoting my own music — but I
feel the need to be more specific, and that requires musical examples. Here is The
End, the first song
in my opera/song cycle Ashflame:
http://www.supload.com/listen?s=O0zjwX - http://www.supload.com/listen?s=O0zjwX
The vocal
part — or rather, from where the oboe picks up the tune — was made by
“improvisation”. The intro, however, is based on the simple motif G-C#-D-G-Ab
(which will recur in The Writer, the Play and the Critics, only in 6/8 and starting with an E).
On top of that I placed a melody in the alto flute (a melody that will recur in
another song not yet recorded). The polyphonic work here is clearly not
improvised, and I believe it could not be improvised.
Note that
at the end of the oboe solo (and also later when I sing … free to go) there’s a parallel octave between
the oboe/voice and the bass. This “mistake” would make me flunk an exam, but
the effect is exactly what I want.
Another
example — the instrumental Afterthoughts and Permutations:
http://www.supload.com/listen?s=nMpv7p - http://www.supload.com/listen?s=nMpv7p
(You may
think I’m a sucker for the curtain sound, but the fact is that between these
two tracks there are nine others without it.)
The first
part is based on an instrumental in 5/4 for classical guitar. It’s what you
would call “improvised”: It’s made on the instrument and written down later.
Then I arranged it, using strings and woodwinds.
The second
part is completely opposite: Most of it it’s pure maths. I’m not a
mathematician, but I found a way to permute a tone row of 24 tones (actually 12
tones played forwards and backwards) and thus create nine more rows. Based on
this, I made a fugue theme (or “subject”) and composed a fugal exposition. From
the 13th bar I introduce the tone rows one by one, using a technique
called stretto (Engfürung in German), meaning that the next
permutation (or “answer”) starts before the previous one is finished.
It’s
probably more or less impossible to detect the structure without reading the
notes (and even then it would take some hard thinking, I guess). After the
fugal exposition I ignored the traditional principles of counterpoint
completely and tried to compose an atonal piece of music working entirely on
it’s own terms. To balance the density of the music I went for a transparent
instrumentation, using the symphony orchestra more like a chamber orchestra.
The time
signature is 2/4 all the way through. The rhythm is, believe it or not,
inspired by a passage in Mr. Blue Sky by ELO. Still, it’s probably the most complex
piece I’ve made in terms of rhythm.
Links to
the rest of the recorded parts of Ashflame, in the right order:
http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=66430 - http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=66430
Final
advice: Use the Internet (and especially Wikipedia) and, if possible, try out
your ideas with MIDI files. Good luck!
(Sorry for
this long post, but you asked for it.)
Cheers!
Espen
------------- He say nothing is quite what it seems;
I say nothing is nothing
(Peter Hammill)
|