The Godfather Part One, Two, or Three?
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics not related to music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=69648
Printed Date: January 31 2025 at 21:43
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: The Godfather Part One, Two, or Three?
Posted By: The Monodrone
Subject: The Godfather Part One, Two, or Three?
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 08:32
"It's a question you can't refuse" to answer.  Extremely bad joke, I know.Both very good, IMO.... Hmm... I'm going to go with Pt. 2, because of Robert De Niro plays a great role in it. I don't see 3 getting a lot of votes...  -------------  
|
Replies:
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 08:35
|
Part two for me. Part three is rubbish. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow"> 
|
Posted By: progkidjoel
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 08:46
|
Part 2 for me as well; shame that 3 was so poor.
------------- 
|
Posted By: yanch
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 12:24
| Part 1 for me. Two is okay, especially DeNiro, but not as good as 1. |
Posted By: CinemaZebra
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 12:30
|
Wow, I thought I was alone preferring the second one. But maybe as this poll goes on, I'll find out that I was right all along.
------------- 
|
Posted By: UndercoverBoy
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 16:30
|
I'll give my vote to Part I, even if Part II is very very good too. I have yet to see Part III, but given as how it is almost unanimously considered much weaker than the first two I guess it doesn't matter. |
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 16:36
Most people generally think the second is better, although I don't know why. ------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you |
CinemaZebra wrote:Posted By: thellama73
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 16:41
|
Although the second is generally considered better, I like Part I best.
------------- 
|
Posted By: manofmystery
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 17:16
|
The first two are close but Brando and James Caan's contributions make the first my favorite
I still refuse to see the 3rd -------------  Time always wins. |
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 17:42
|
Probably in numerical order for me. I didn't think Ill was all that bad. (I just typed ill )
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened... 
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 18:36
|
Didn't like any of them ------------- What? |
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 18:39
|
I think 2 holds up the best and is by far the most interesting and authentic |
Posted By: The Monodrone
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 19:03
 You and Peter Griffin. -------------
|
Posted By: Dellinger
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 22:13
| I have only seen them once, so don't really remember, but this thread just made me want to see them again. |
Posted By: Falx
Date Posted: July 28 2010 at 03:30
|
Part One. Unless you've read the book (which is mandatory), Part Two doesn't make a whole lot of sense. I actually enjoyed Part Three, not as much as the first two parts sure, but I don't think it was as bad as everyone made out. ------------- "You must go beyond the limit of the limit of your limits!" - Mr. Doctor "It is our duty as men and women to proceed as though the limits of our abilities do not exist." - Pierre Teilhard de Chardin |
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: July 28 2010 at 03:43
Agreed. It even won the Oscar for best film (maybe the competition wasn't strong, I never heard about three of the other four nominated films). |
Posted By: caretaker
Date Posted: July 28 2010 at 09:16
| Two for me. It took me three times to get through III without falling asleep. |
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: July 28 2010 at 09:28
Oh my God, I agree with Slarti on something 
I have to say though, even though III is perceived to be the weakest, I do still like it as a movie; if it were seen in isolation, it would still knock seven shades of +++good for the roses+++ out of 99% of other gangster films (in my humble opinion of course  )------------- 
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012 |
Posted By: CinemaZebra
Date Posted: July 28 2010 at 11:59
-------------
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: July 28 2010 at 13:15
You are not fit to be an Admin....   I prefer the first one, though only because is the one I saw first and which made me fall in love with these trilogy... All of them (even the flawed 3) are great, the first two the highest peak in movies for me.. ------------- 
|
Posted By: Conor Fynes
Date Posted: July 29 2010 at 03:39
| One is the only one i've seen.. so yeah! |