Print Page | Close Window

Audiophiles?

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: Tech Talk
Forum Description: Discuss musical instruments, equipment, hi-fi, speakers, vinyl, gadgets,etc.
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=692
Printed Date: November 25 2024 at 21:59
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Audiophiles?
Posted By: Stormcrow
Subject: Audiophiles?
Date Posted: May 02 2004 at 11:54

I'm very curious now because of the conspicuous lack of response in this area.

How many of us here consider themselves to be "audiophiles" seeking the best home audio experience you can reasonably afford, above and beyond our collective love of the dense, complex music we call Prog Rock?




Replies:
Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: May 04 2004 at 01:11

Ermm ^ Well, me, tentatively. It's just that the "afford" word gets in my way. Thus my commie slave-labour system....Embarrassed

One day though, you and the far-famed "drivers of Rohan" better watch out! Wink



-------------
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.


Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: May 04 2004 at 02:56
I guess you could put me in that particular box, too - although I feel the only way I shall achieve audio Nirvana will be via my weekly investment in the National Lottery......

-------------

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: May 22 2004 at 17:20

Me!!! But my budget is much lower than my ears want me to go out and buy.

I'm not a "buff", so don't know model numbers unless I go down and look, but I've got a 150W per channel (RMS) Akai amp with inputs AND outputs coming out of its ears, including video, digital optical, effects send/return and stuff I don't even know about. All I care is it sounds AWESOME and goes WAY past 11!!!

It drives a pair of floor-standing Mission speakers that are rated 30hz-30,000khz and have a predeliction for bass. As a bass player, that suits me just fine - except I have to watch the window-rattling...

Everything else is Sony, except for the turntable and the DVD. I have a matched CD player and MD recorder and 3-head cassette tape deck. Just sold my Bang & Olufsen Reel-to-Reel on eBay, as the Left channel had gone and I didn't know how to fix it. replacement heads are like chicken's teeth

My DVD is a Cambridge Audio, which plays MP3s as well as normal CDs and photo/video CDs.

My turntable is a technics, and I play all my lovely first-pressing prog vinyl on it. Mmmm. Vinyl. Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Anyone care to have the Vinyl vs CD debate?



Posted By: Dusanyu
Date Posted: May 29 2004 at 00:45
I just use Merantz Equiptment that was manufactured in
the 70's (Tubes Rock!!) with Bose 901's to my ears i
have yet to find equiptment that produses a better
sound


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: May 29 2004 at 07:49
NICE!!!


Posted By: shark
Date Posted: June 02 2004 at 19:05

you can count me in as a Hi-Fi enthusiast. For years I had an average system which performed reasonably well (Thorens turntable, Philips CD player, Marantz amp and JPW speakers), recently though I have upgraded to the following: Roxan Xerxes turntable, Audio Research SP7 pre-amp, Audio Research D130 power-amp and Martin Logan Aerius speakers (hybrid electrostatics).

When using vinyl, I have a valve pre-amp EAR 834P.....but I still have the old Philips CD player.The end  result is unbelievable. Every evening I have been sitting in front of my system, drooling like a demented dog, jaw dropped in utter disbelief at the sheer quality of detail and fantastic sound-staging I get out of my system.....  



Posted By: mimusica
Date Posted: June 04 2004 at 21:53

Years ago I bought a used pair of Bower & Wilkins 801 Matrix series II loudspeakers and a whole new world opened up. Awesome sound, deepest cleanest low, crisp mid and oh so sweet high, I'm in heaven, BABY!

These speakers are driven by a Bryston 4B (2x250 Watts) main amp and a bunch of Rotel and Sony gear (Pre-amp, DAT, SACD and MC). Happy The Man, Camel, Genesis, PF and lots of other good prog bands sound as if they were in my living room, if just my wife and kids would finally SHUT THE HELL UP!!!!



-------------
Without music, life would be a mistake.
Friedrich Nietzsche



Posted By: goose
Date Posted: July 02 2004 at 09:37

Cambridge Audio is a sweet, sweet sound.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: July 20 2004 at 07:10

 

Hello friends!

Here's my system:

-Loudspeakers Mission M71i on floorstand atacama filled with sand

-tube  amplifier Jolida sj 302 pseudo triode

-Cd Nad 520

-Tuner denon

-K7 Pionner ctf 1000

-Subwoofer Magnat omega 380

-Power cables eupen (it's french: first price and excellent)

-Interconnect cables esoteric audio Accu path (hp)(bi cable and 2 cables for the bass!) and Tech3i (modul)

-Fadel amethyst vibration-canceller and others carbon kevlar plate

-Sector filters and direct electric lines to the electric board of my house (very important).

My wanted-list:

-Good préamp

-Big tuner like Mc intosh

-Vynil Lp12 with moving coil dynavector

-Big tape deck like Nakamichi 1000 (zxl) or even studer a701

Any questions?

 

 



Posted By: EVO
Date Posted: July 23 2004 at 04:11
juz a sony set (qs-series) with fr-philips(hifi sound system 1979!, and still very good), r-B&W, c-kef, sub-kef. and a 1€ akai turn table with a 100€ ortofon elliptical needle

-------------
Live Long and Prosper...


Posted By: arcer
Date Posted: April 09 2005 at 12:17
sort of in the category but i just won't make the leap
into serious high end cause my suspicion is that
there is a serious law of diminishing returns at work
as you invest more and more.
My system's strictly middle ground and I'll keep it that
way. I occasionally suffer from bouts of upgrade-itis -
currently centred on my awful speakers and ageing
cd player.

at the moment tho

Linn LP12 with Basik arm and Sumiko Blue Point
Moving Coil cartridge into
Musical Fidelity XLPS phoo stage into
Myriad MP100 power amp
Myriad MA250 pre amp
Marantz CD63SE Mk11 CD player
Some kind of generic Sony receiver (not a big radio
listener)
RTL TDL3 speakers
cabling's pretty generic though I'd like someting
decent like Nordost Flatline Gold for speakers
and Black Knights for interconnects

I'd love to upgrade to a set of System Audio 1280s for
speakers. these are Danish, slim, beautiful and
sound better than you would think - about E1600
And I haven't decided on CD yet, though I have seen
a choice Audio Analogue for about E700 second
hand....


Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 10 2005 at 01:32
Not bad, except the sony tuner (try a Denon, there are
excellent budget tuner).
Audio analogue is real average on CD, better choose a Nad, Naim, Rega, Arcam or creek in this price range.
I don't know your speakers's brand.


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 11:01
I consider myself a pseudo-audiophile. I can't afford audiophile-quality records on my meager $6.50/ hour at Arby's (yes, I am a student), but I still prefer really thin vinyl (if not 180 g) to CD purely for listening purposes.


Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 14 2005 at 10:05
Bravo!
well said!


Posted By: HaroldLand
Date Posted: April 25 2005 at 22:12
the only thing that really annoys me with respect to sound quality is digital compression distortion, when you get that wierd subtle flangy effect on the highs, like cymbals and such.. i can tolerate record crackling.. its part of what gives records their character, imo, plus we all know that records are much, much warmer than cds


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 26 2005 at 01:35

.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 26 2005 at 02:06
Right


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 26 2005 at 18:44

.



Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 26 2005 at 19:13
Tape decks are only good for getting down music ideas or for taping a song off the radio.


Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 27 2005 at 02:31
Record a vynil or radio on this one, or simply play a good pre-recorded k7 (the must is to get an analog one):
Anyway, it detroys ALL the current cd players.

In your opinion...
Which wins? [;)










Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 27 2005 at 10:10



Hey karnevil, just upgrade my Jolida 302 yesterday.


It's a huge upgrade, i can't believe my ears.
The WBT plugs bring an incredible transparency.

Bypassed the source selector, volume and balance so it's now a pure power amp.
Moreover, i've changed the Speakers connectics and the RCA by WBT topline with the new Silver Nextgen RCA.
It's simply the abolute best RCA plug available in the world.

Nextgen SILVER-The ABOLUTE MUST RCA
This is what i put on my amp




The new principle:







Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 10:25

.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 11:11
Yes, all my money goes into hifi.

No,i'm not student, i work (i'm 27 btw)

The new "Nextgen" plug is a revolution, compare to the former ones.




Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 11:54

.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 11:58
No, i only said i was young.

It's maybe good, but WBT wins anyway.




Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 12:01

.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 12:05
No, because it's the BEST technology ever.

And you hear it on a transparent system.

Five gold layers on the speakers plug.

Here's what i have:



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 12:06
Do what you want, but this will be less good.

But maybe your system is not transparent enough for you to hear the difference?


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 12:16

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Do what you want, but this will be less good.

But maybe your system is not transparent enough for you to hear the difference?

Dream on



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 13:14
Ok so i give up...

Anyway this is giving pearls to pigs...



Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 13:29

.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 14:08
-Someone who says that WBT connectics are not the best and who prefer "Tartemuche" connectics.

-Someone who says that Linn LP12 and Rega planar 3 are craps!

-Someone who says that output's transo of my tube amp will burn if i play rock with it (?!!!)What's the difference between classical and rock for my amp, btw???

-Someone who prefer Nakamichi Dragon or CR7 over Naka 1000 zxl...

Without comment...

And this person is in hifi for 25 years!

If music and sound are important for you, i'm afraid you have lost your time!!


Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 14:51
Is it a dream?





Perfect to listen to Radio gnome invisible:



Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 28 2005 at 17:56

.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: April 29 2005 at 02:21
This Counterpoint pic is from the net.

But my best friend have it (in black btw)

I can send you pics of us posing in front of the devices and with a piece of carboard, with written:"Hi Karnevil!"

so the humiliation will be complete.

Is that what you want?


Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: April 29 2005 at 06:26

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

This Counterpoint pic is from the net.

But my best friend have it (in black btw)

I can send you pics of us posing in front of the devices and with a piece of carboard, with written:"Hi Karnevil!"

so the humiliation will be complete.

Is that what you want?

for christsake Oliver,just do it!Confused

Or stop answering his posts............



-------------





Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 29 2005 at 07:52

.



Posted By: goose
Date Posted: April 29 2005 at 11:49
Can't you both just accept that the other is wrong? Nobody else has any idea about all this audiophile talk anyway


Posted By: Tony Fisher
Date Posted: May 01 2005 at 11:56

My system:

Pink Triangle Anniversary TT

SME Series V arm

Lyra Lydian cartridge

Audiolab 8000P and 8000C pre/power combo

Mission 753 Freedom speakers

Pioneer CTS 831S casssette deck (this tape deck is FAR from crap!!)

Sonic Link Violet interconnects throughout

 

I don't have a CD player because I can't afford one good enough to compare with the PT (even if one exists, which I doubt)

 

Cost £7500 in 1998. Sounds wonderful (and I can post pictures of myself with it if anyone doubts my ownership!). Main listening: Yes, Genesis, Pink Floyd, Runrig, Wishbone Ash, Marillion, Horslips, Strawbs, Camel, Caravan, Solution, Focus, Golden Earring, Gryphon, Gentle Giant, Fairport Convention, Steeleye Span, Five Hand Reel + some heavy metal, hard rock and Scottish and Irish folk / folk rock.

Some of you across the pond won't have heard of some of those, I guess!

 



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 01 2005 at 15:15
I've got a pionner CTF1000, which was Naka 1000's concurrent at the time and a Studer A710 professional deck (it beat yours)and i plain to upgrade to a Naka 1000zxl, which is actually the best ever.



Posted By: Tony Fisher
Date Posted: May 01 2005 at 18:46

Sure, but with a turntable as good as the Pink Triangle, tapes are a last resort anyway.

Mind you, I have recorded off the PT on to my Pioneer using metal tapes and then played the two in synch, challenging people to 1) tell the difference 2) tell which is which. Most can just detect a tiny difference but they can't always say which is the tape!

You say in an earlier post that you are contemplating a Linn LP12 - for God's sake LISTEN before you buy. In the wrong system, they can sound truly foul.



Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: May 01 2005 at 19:55

.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 02 2005 at 03:29
Originally posted by Tony Fisher Tony Fisher wrote:

Sure, but with a turntable as good as the Pink Triangle, tapes are a last resort anyway.


Mind you, I have recorded off the PT on to my Pioneer using metal tapes and then played the two in synch, challenging people to 1) tell the difference 2) tell which is which. Most can just detect a tiny difference but they can't always say which is the tape!


You say in an earlier post that you are contemplating a Linn LP12 - for God's sake LISTEN before you buy. In the wrong system, they can sound truly foul.



On a good and neutral system, Linn LP12 will sound good.
Cause it's neutral and musical.
There's no "compensation" to do!


Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 02 2005 at 03:30
btw, a source like naka1000 zxl go very far in terms of low, high and dynamic.
Much further than many turntables.


Posted By: Tony Fisher
Date Posted: May 03 2005 at 18:40
Oliver, the one thing an LP12 is NOT is neutral. The Pink Triangle Anniversary is utterly neutral (which is why many American audiophiles hate it), the Roxsan Xerxes is fabulous too, the Nottingham Analogue Annalog just disappears and lets the music flow. LP 12s, even with endless upgrades, still sound very coloured even though some are atttracted to the rhythmical and dynamic sound. My old Systemdek IIX which I have in my second system sounds, to my ears, better than a friend's Linn with Valhalla upgrade. As for the Pink, well it murders the Linn. Linns can sound quite good if paired with Naim amps but I inherited a full Linn set up with Linn amps and Isobarik speakers and it was PANTS!


Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 04 2005 at 01:56
What was your cartridge?


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: May 04 2005 at 09:42

.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 04 2005 at 13:56
The kid is a pain cause he knows that:

-naka 1000(zxl) is a great source (and not much kids-and even old- know that today)that beat all cd players and many turntables too.
I also know that it works very very best than bad decks like Dragon and cr7e, that many people like you, ke9, believe to be excellent...

-That a good tube amp beats all transistor of the world in the highs, exept maybe monster double mono blocs Cello reference 2. That's why i keep on quoting Jolida amps, which is the greatest deal in hifi.

Etc...

About Linn LP12, i know that it's very musical, and that's a reference in affordable turntables with Rega Planar 3.
So what cartridge do you put on it?
Moving magnet or moving coil?
Which cables (power and modulation?)
Which vibration canceller system?
Let's talk about real gear!


Posted By: Tony Fisher
Date Posted: May 04 2005 at 19:36

The cartridge in my LP12 was a Linn Karma in an Ittok arm. It was bought by my father in about 1985. I inherited it in 1992. At that time I had a Systemdek IIX with Mission 774 and Ortofon MC10 and Elite MCP555 cartridges going into a Nytech pre amp/tuner and Nytech power amp and finally to a pair of Tangent RS4 speakers. I still have this system as a spare. It was quite old but it still outperformed the Linn system comfortably to my ears so the Linn went. The new system is clearly better than my spare but not by that much considering the price difference.

I do not hold with the view that tube amps are that good except as room heaters. They are too warm and slow for my ears with a few exceptions. Audiolabs are so clean, neutral, fast and powerful and Naims are also excellent - both transistor models.

I generally like MCs better than MMs. I have no need of a vibration canceller as they are a fad - the acrylic platter on the PT Anniversary plus the excellent suspension and record clamp are highly effective and dampen vibration well enough on my Soundstyle table. Power cables are standard PT issue.

Finally, don't confuse rhythmical and dynamic with musical. The Linn is not musical in my view because instruments don't sound natural on it.

I like the Planar3 - my best friend has one and swears by it. For a fairly cheap deck, it's excellent value, as are the Project range. But it's not a patch on a PT Anniversary, SME, Nottingham Annalogue Hyperspace or a Roxsan Xerxes. All of these could lay claim to be best deck and I auditioned them all before choosing the Anniversary for myself.

I have not heard the Helius Orion arm myself but I have heard nothing but good reports on it so I suspect Karnevil9 will be very happy with his own Anniversary. Where in the UK are you? I e-mailed the PT's designer (Arthur Khoubesserian) recently and he tells me that he may put the Anniversary back into production and he's developed and upgrade for it. Interesting!!



Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: May 04 2005 at 20:09

Oliver:

time to post them pictures,mate.

It is the only way to end this!



-------------





Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: May 04 2005 at 20:13

.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 03:16
Originally posted by Tony Fisher Tony Fisher wrote:

The cartridge in my LP12 was a Linn Karma in an Ittok arm. It was bought by my father in about 1985. I inherited it in 1992. At that time I had a Systemdek IIX with Mission 774 and Ortofon MC10 and Elite MCP555 cartridges going into a Nytech pre amp/tuner and Nytech power amp and finally to a pair of Tangent RS4 speakers. I still have this system as a spare. It was quite old but it still outperformed the Linn system comfortably to my ears so the Linn went. The new system is clearly better than my spare but not by that much considering the price difference.


I do not hold with the view that tube amps are that good except as room heaters. They are too warm and slow for my ears with a few exceptions. Audiolabs are so clean, neutral, fast and powerful and Naims are also excellent - both transistor models.


I generally like MCs better than MMs. I have no need of a vibration canceller as they are a fad - the acrylic platter on the PT Anniversary plus the excellent suspension and record clamp are highly effective and dampen vibration well enough on my Soundstyle table. Power cables are standard PT issue.


Finally, don't confuse rhythmical and dynamic with musical. The Linn is not musical in my view because instruments don't sound natural on it.


I like the Planar3 - my best friend has one and swears by it. For a fairly cheap deck, it's excellent value, as are the Project range. But it's not a patch on a PT Anniversary, SME, Nottingham Annalogue Hyperspace or a Roxsan Xerxes. All of these could lay claim to be best deck and I auditioned them all before choosing the Anniversary for myself.


I have not heard the Helius Orion arm myself but I have heard nothing but good reports on it so I suspect Karnevil9 will be very happy with his own Anniversary. Where in the UK are you? I e-mailed the PT's designer (Arthur Khoubesserian) recently and he tells me that he may put the Anniversary back into production and he's developed and upgrade for it. Interesting!!



Ok, so first, youdon't know nothing about tube amps if you think there are slow and not neutral.
You have never heard a Jolida or a Conrad Jonhson.
I repeat: it beats all transistors inthe world inthe Highs.
Ther's nothing to do.
Although, a steel triangle is needed below the tube amp,in order to have a quick "low".
You don't use vib cancellers...not good cables (links and power), i suppose you don'tuse power filters and separted dedicated lines..
So it's hard for you to judge something, cause your system lack of transparency!
BTW, Linn Karma is an excellent cartridge.
But it can't compensate the rest of your very average system (especially the amp, prepre, etc...)


Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 03:18
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Oliver:


time to post them pictures,mate.


It is the only way to end this!



Dear reed,

I'm afraid this would end nothing!
These guys pretend enormous bullsh*ts, and i keep on explaining them the basics!


Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 04:34
To ke9 and Fisher:

That’s not because you hea a bad Linn LP12 with bad cartridge or/and on a bad system that
Linn LP12 is bad.
That’s not because you have heard a bad tube amp one time that all are bad!!

Moreover, i’ve been to a sound convention in Paris two years ago.
On the Conrad Johnson showroom, they put an excellent Conrad amp (which i know to be better than my Jolida)directly on the floor like an old sock, with a bad source (Copland Cd player) and bad speakers (Fidelta). All without vib’ cancellers, good cables, filters, nothing!!

It was really inimpressive and that’s normal.

I know if i put this amp on my system, it will be extraordinary...cause it’s carefully optimized.

I’ve already said, but to have separated electric lines which go directly to your home electric counter, is ESSENTIAL to have dynamic. I use 4mm diamater electric cables for amps, sub, (every devices which need much power)and 2.5 mm diameter lines for sources, preamp, which need few power.
You can even use 6 mm diameter line if you have very big power amp.
You must use one line per device.
You must have good power cords and power filters (isolation transfos)

Direct lines give you dynamic, whereas good power cords and filters give you subtlity and remove harshness.





Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 05:51
"Finally, don't confuse rhythmical and dynamic with musical. The Linn is not musical in my view because instruments don't sound natural on it."

I think the Linn reveals the defaults of your system!


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 06:04

.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 07:03
Why are you getting nervous?
can't we discuss quietly?

Sorry, i haven't a numeric photo device yet...

Soon, i promise!

And what do you want me to take a pic?
My system, incuding the Studer, and the Jolida with the new wbt on it?
Or my best friend's system, including the counterpoint sa5000 preamp, goldmund mimesis IV and naka 700zxl?

And you, btw, please take a pic of your naka 1000 zxl (i remember you pretend to have one) and your whole system.



Posted By: Tony Fisher
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 14:04

Oliver,

I have heard many tube amps (though admittedly not the ones you mention) and all have the same basic characteristics. It all comes down to which sound you like - transistor (like me) or tube (like you). There is no right or wrong - just preference.

You have not heard my system so how can you possibly say it's not transparent (it is, amazingly so) or that it's "average" (it is not). I can assure you that I have a degree in physics (St Andrews University - 1978, want a scan of the cert?) and have taught physics and electronics for 26 years so I understand the principles involved and I remain TOTALLY unconvinced that the fads such as separate power lines and vibration isolators make ANY difference to a system whatsoever and DEFINITELY not to a transistor amp.  2.5mm cable can carry all the current even the biggest domestic amp needs. Tubes may need slightly thicker cable because they draw higher currents due to the heating effect. There is a lot of bo****ks talked about this in audiophile mags.

And to say the Linn reveals the faults of my system - frankly the PT Anniversary wipes it off the face of the planet. And you've obviously never heard an Audiolab amp or the Mission 753s (all extremely critically acclaimed).

Perhaps you should do me the courtesy of not criticising my system without at least hearing it first. I have not passed comment on yours.

Oh, and a Copland CD player was one of the few I thought were OK when I auditioned! I've never seen a bad review of one, either. It appears that you and I simply have different tastes.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 14:34
You pretend to be a scientist, so how can you doubt of bad effects of vibrations on devices?
That's obvious that it works when you do the test.
Tubes, for example, are very subject to vibes.
That's why you have a huge improvement when you put a steel triangle under a tube amp.
Anyway, only listening can tell you if a theory is valid or not.
Tubes amp have higher distorsions rate than transistor ones but it's night and day in the highs when you compare to a transistor.
So, what does it means?
That distortion's rate is NOT the good criteria to judge musicality.
Thre's also a theory with pair/impair harmonics.
On the other hand, transistor are tighter and quicker in the low than tubes, that's why bi-amplification with good transistor in the low and tubes in the high is the best.

It's the same with cables: you can measure a very bad cable and an extraordinary cable: the results will be the same, but when you listen, ther's no comparison.


About Copland, that's not the worth CD ever, but there are a lot of british musical players in the same range of price that will work a lot better (Naim, Arcam, Creek, etc...).
This is just a really average source, compare to analog sources.

It's obvious that separated lines are better cause devices pollute themselves (electrically,i mean),
(the CD is the worth for that, that's why i use double if not triple power filter isolation, and have a huge improvment in term of loss of sharpness on CD.)
Moreover, devices like power amp need much power and a bigger diameter lowers the cable's resistivity.

Another phenomenon with power is that the sound is better the evening from about 11 PM, when much industries have stopped their day and so , don'tconsume power.
You hear that on a good tranparent system.
So, that's prove power's quality have an effect on sound.


Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 15:14
...moreover our friend ke9, hifi expert from 25 years knows about the effects of vibrations and power's quality.


Posted By: Tony Fisher
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 15:39

1) I don't pretend to be a scientist - I am one by profession. Fact.

2) Of course I appreciate the effects of vibration - on mechanical systems such as CD players, speakers and turntables. Valves are not mechanical and I see no way that vibration will adversely affect their performance if they are securely fixed.

3) Yes, the mains is slightly affected by fluctuations in loading. That's why my PT uses an AC supply to charge a battery to power a DC motor. It's more stable that way. But it's only the voltage that's affected and in the UK the mains has been slightly downgraded from 240V RMS to 230V RMS to reduce this.

4) I agree that the test of a system is how it sounds - and I have not yet heard a cable or interconnect or a plug that significantly affects the quality of a system compared to the components in it. Physically, the capacitive, inductive and resistive differences of decent quality cables are relatively minimal and should not be significant. The output characteristics of devices vary far more. Of course, you may know better than I do.

 

Tony Fisher BSc, MSc, MEd.



Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 16:36
1) OK, you are a scientist.

2)Yes, Cd is very vulnerable to vibes like turntable.
I use carbon/kevlar plates with ceramic cones and steel/teflon "Fadel Amethyst cancellers".
"Relaxa" plate is even better (the device is in "levitation" due to two plates repulsing each others with powerful natural magnets.)
Free tip: check with a plumb level that your CD/turntable
is perfectly horizontal. If not, it creates vibrations which affects dramatically the sound.
Use hard matters like dense wood pieces to equilibrate your device in order it's perfectly horizontal.
If you don't hear nothing, it's because your system is not transparent enough.
Valves are vulnerable to vibes.
any composants are vulnerable to vibes.
Even transistor amps are vulnerable to vibes
Eventually all devices!

3) Yes, a battery is the perfect power source, cause it delivers stable power.
But more than power variations, pollution between devices is what affects worst the sound.

4)I swear that good cables affect dramatically the sound.

Good interconnect cables is the fisrt step to reach a
good level of transparency.
Without it, you can't hear nothing.
For low budget, i advice Qed Cables, musical and neutral english cables.
For higher budgets, i suggest american brands such as Kimber, Synergetic research, and of course Transparent cables which are the best of the best!




Posted By: Tony Fisher
Date Posted: May 08 2005 at 18:58

Oliver,

Sorry, but I auditioned interconnects from £20 to 300 and speaker cable from £8 to £100 a metre when I chose my system (I had up to £30000 to spend if I wanted to!). Starting with my own Linn LP12 as source, there was almost no difference until I put a Roksan Xerxes (my original choice of TT) into the system when subtle differences between the extremes could be discerned. When I substituted the Pink Triangle Anniversary (the most neutral and transparent deck ever built without any argument) it was clear that there was a small difference but that a set of £90 interconnects (Sonic Link Violets) were every bit as good as the most expensive. Changing amps etc affected the sound VASTLY more than any tiny differences between the cables and you certainly couldn't tell any difference at all on a TT as third rate and outdated as an LP12.

Can I ask you, have you ever actually ever HEARD an LP12 (or a PT Anniversary for that matter) or are you just going on what your friend says? I have owned both and I can't take anyone seriously who suggests for one second that an LP12 is a reference over a PT Anniversary and that I can't hear subtle differences on my system because it's "average" when it is one of the most transparent systems possible. If you could fault my system, it's TOO neutral and transparent for some and a few people find it sterile, especially those who love the fat, warm valve sound. Personally, I like what I've got!!

 



Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: May 09 2005 at 06:28
Originally posted by Tony Fisher Tony Fisher wrote:

Oliver,

Sorry, but I auditioned interconnects from £20 to 300 and speaker cable from £8 to £100 a metre when I chose my system (I had up to £30000 to spend if I wanted to!). Starting with my own Linn LP12 as source, there was almost no difference until I put a Roksan Xerxes (my original choice of TT) into the system when subtle differences between the extremes could be discerned. When I substituted the Pink Triangle Anniversary (the most neutral and transparent deck ever built without any argument) it was clear that there was a small difference but that a set of £90 interconnects (Sonic Link Violets) were every bit as good as the most expensive. Changing amps etc affected the sound VASTLY more than any tiny differences between the cables and you certainly couldn't tell any difference at all on a TT as third rate and outdated as an LP12.

Can I ask you, have you ever actually ever HEARD an LP12 (or a PT Anniversary for that matter) or are you just going on what your friend says? I have owned both and I can't take anyone seriously who suggests for one second that an LP12 is a reference over a PT Anniversary and that I can't hear subtle differences on my system because it's "average" when it is one of the most transparent systems possible. If you could fault my system, it's TOO neutral and transparent for some and a few people find it sterile, especially those who love the fat, warm valve sound. Personally, I like what I've got!!

 

 

Tony

I've just purchased an old Logic 'DM101' deck for a song,as in it's sate i bought it ie: no twweking,it's quite evident that it is a far better sounding deck without a doubt than the Linn 'Condek'I love the PT 'Anny' but as my hi-fi comes & goes as regular as changing socks, i've been offered an over priced sum for the PT that i can't refuse.The 'Anni' is without a doubt one of the most neutral decks i've ever heard but i sometimes feel it's a bit over neutral which tends to lean the Bass on the dry side slightly.As well as i'm positive the jeweled bearing is not perfect.

What's your views on the Logic...It's the last model with the big coil spring around the bearing housing???



Posted By: Tony Fisher
Date Posted: May 09 2005 at 13:53

Karnevil9

Anniversaries are rare (c400 made I think) and those who like the sound (or complete lack of it) will pay big money second hand. The bass is astonishingly deep but dry - you can tell easily the model of bass a bassist is using when you would have no chance on a LInn or Rega 3 (which I rate highly in the budget range). I have had no problem with the bearing; it's a novel design and seems to work well. The Audiolab amps and Mission speakers are also very neutral - that's the way I like it, but I accept it's not everybody's taste.

I heard a Logic DM 101 many years ago but the amp and speakers were not good (Pioneer + Bose (YUK!!!)) so it had no chance. Hence I can't comment on how it will sound in a decent system. My old Systemdek IIX does not disgrace itself against the Pink and still punches a long way above its price - I suspect so will the Logic. It will beat a Linn, I'm sure.

Best Wishes

Tony



Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: May 09 2005 at 18:44
Originally posted by Tony Fisher Tony Fisher wrote:

Karnevil9

Anniversaries are rare (c400 made I think) and those who like the sound (or complete lack of it) will pay big money second hand. The bass is astonishingly deep but dry - you can tell easily the model of bass a bassist is using when you would have no chance on a LInn or Rega 3 (which I rate highly in the budget range). I have had no problem with the bearing; it's a novel design and seems to work well. The Audiolab amps and Mission speakers are also very neutral - that's the way I like it, but I accept it's not everybody's taste.

I heard a Logic DM 101 many years ago but the amp and speakers were not good (Pioneer + Bose (YUK!!!)) so it had no chance. Hence I can't comment on how it will sound in a decent system. My old Systemdek IIX does not disgrace itself against the Pink and still punches a long way above its price - I suspect so will the Logic. It will beat a Linn, I'm sure.

Best Wishes

Tony

Tony:

Thanks for that ..funny how that is as i have a Systemdek '11x-900' here at the mo ready for off & i thought the same but i've compared the Logic to the Systemdek & i prefer the Logic.

Tony i'm not just saying this to piss Oliver off but the Rega 3 always sounded better than a Linn 'Condek' in my view but there both iffy all the same.

btw i was offered £2,750 for the Anny alone & well it's packed ready.

Have you seen the Pink Triangle 'Ventricles' Arthur Khouberserrian(P.T. MD) is selling on E-bay.Be quick though.

Karney



Posted By: Tony Fisher
Date Posted: May 10 2005 at 03:05

Hmm, may have a go at those - though I've never heard them!!!! At the present price they gotta be cheap.

I paid £2300 for my Anny (arm/cartridge not included). I've been offered £2k for it alone but there's no way I would ever sell it. Until Arthur puts them back into production, they will remain extremely expensive 2nd hand.

Tony




Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk