How Do We Bring in The Next Generation of Prog
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Music Lounge
Forum Description: General progressive music discussions
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=68789
Printed Date: February 12 2025 at 03:45 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: How Do We Bring in The Next Generation of Prog
Posted By: VonSchlemmer
Subject: How Do We Bring in The Next Generation of Prog
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 04:54
Do you think the genre will be able to go through another generation guys, or will music's ways just take its toll.
|
Replies:
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 04:57
What are you even asking? You should try reading back over what you just said, because it doesn't have a whole lot of meaning and doesn't make a lot of sense.
-------------
|
Posted By: squirting
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 05:01
Question mark needed there m8.
Also I'm 16 and love prog, does this count as a new generation?
------------- "So that's it? After 12 years; so long, good luck?"
"Now I don't recall saying good luck."
|
Posted By: VonSchlemmer
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 05:03
The next generation of artists, beyond what we have left nowadays - Transatlantic, Spock's Beard, etc.
|
Posted By: squirting
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 05:15
I plan to start a band with progressive tendencies one day. Is this good enough?
------------- "So that's it? After 12 years; so long, good luck?"
"Now I don't recall saying good luck."
|
Posted By: VonSchlemmer
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 05:26
squirting wrote:
I plan to start a band with progressive tendencies one day. Is this good enough?
| It is
|
Posted By: squirting
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 05:54
ur all gud den
------------- "So that's it? After 12 years; so long, good luck?"
"Now I don't recall saying good luck."
|
Posted By: friso
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 06:09
I think the topics question is very logical, but's it's very hard to answer. Just one band change the complete musical direction, just as Pink Floyd did. With such a happening a lot of people get involved in the genre and we have ourselves a new generation of progressive rock.
The future of music is however pretty dark. With the technology growing more and more amateurs will be able to make music and release it on the internet. Soon it will be very hard to hear the difference between a professional recording and a symphony of midi-sounds.
|
Posted By: dan_awesome
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 08:24
But a well-written and arranged symphony of midi-sounds can still add a lot to a group who otherwise would be stuck with the standard guitar/bass/drums. I wouldn't look at it like "technology is stealing the spotlight from the professionals" but rather, more like "technology is giving people who struggle to complete their band lineup a chance to record the sound they've always wanted."
heh, you can see which side I fall on...
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 08:53
Prog supposedly died in the '70's, yet on this site I see there is a new generation of fans and prog musicians. I have complete confidence that prog will carry on for more generations. It's good stuff after all. It won't be exactly like '70's prog, but I don't care. I grew up with '70's prog, stuck with it in the '80's, 90's, 00's. If I had children, I might just have made prog fans out of them. I have encountered more than a few persons in the forums that had a parent or two that liked prog and they discovered it from their parent's music collection. Just consider the persistence of classical music...
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 08:57
VonSchlemmer wrote:
The next generation of artists, beyond what we have left nowadays - Transatlantic, Spock's Beard, etc. |
I realize this, but you don't really elaborate on what you mean by "Or will music's ways just take its toll" It's way too open for different interpretations to the point where not everyone is going to understand what you're asking from the same perspective.
-------------
|
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 12:19
The future of prog is free jazz and avant-garde
|
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 12:29
Captain Clutch wrote:
The future of prog is free jazz and avant-garde
|
Somehow I highly doubt that. ![LOL LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif)
|
Posted By: jplanet
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 12:45
Ironically, the path to prog for the new generation appears to be punk and metal....Band like Muse and Coheed and Cambria started with a largely punk-leaning audience (and were able to score major label record and touring deals this way), before they went more prog...Dream Theater, Opeth and Porcupine Tree can credit their commercial success to their appeal to metal audiences...Then a lot of these younger fans seek out the older influences and find out about more obsucre prog bands...Much like how rap artists drew attention to Parliament/Funkadelic back in the early 90's...
------------- https://www.facebook.com/ShadowCircus/" rel="nofollow - ..::welcome to the shadow circus::..
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 12:48
I think animal sacrifice is required...
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 12:51
A Person wrote:
Captain Clutch wrote:
The future of prog is free jazz and avant-garde
|
Somehow I highly doubt that. ![LOL LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif)
|
No, really, look at the wealth of avant bands coming out lately! we'll never run out!
That, and extreme metal
|
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 12:54
Captain Clutch wrote:
A Person wrote:
Captain Clutch wrote:
The future of prog is free jazz and avant-garde
|
Somehow I highly doubt that. ![LOL LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif)
|
No, really, look at the wealth of avant bands coming out lately! we'll never run out!
That, and extreme metal
|
There has always been the avant-garde side but I don't know if it's becoming the flag-bearer for all prog or anything like that. I do hope so though. ![Big smile Big smile](smileys/smiley4.gif)
|
Posted By: RoyFairbank
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 15:58
Prog was a one-generational affair. Its boomer music. Some late boomer waves adopted epigonic versions of it , for instance Marillion, IQ and Pallas. At this point the genre was already done growing as such. By the period of Generation X prog began its decline. New bands that were influenced by Prog were smothered in Heavy Metal and Alternative. Whatever prog sensibilities they had were just as epigonic or more so than the neo-prog wave, but on the whole they abandoned the most important aspects of prog. The only enjoyable modern prog act I've heard is Phideaux, but he is a very minor and insignificant figure. Not even the nuprog bands, taken at face value, are anywhere near as significant as the prog bands of the 1970s.
In another generation Prog will further deteriorate as against modern pop and alternative. If this doesn't happen, it will be because all three will be replaced by a completely new, prog like type of music. This however, will not happen unless there is a cultural revolution like in the 60s which created prog. This is unlikely, as culture today is growing more reactionary.
|
Posted By: Tarquin Underspoon
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 16:07
Nah, there will always be some "prog" in some form or fashion. We just might not recognize it as prog if we were to hear it nowadays. Play some Porcupine Tree for a concert hall full of Yes fans in 1974. I guarantee they would not know what to make of it, and they would probably think it crap. The idea behind prog isn't going anywhere, but the music itself is constantly changing.
That said, I do think the music business is doomed, and we may not even experience music in a way that is familiar to us. I shudder to think of the day that the CD dies out officially, because that, I believe, is the long-anticipated end. But that's neither here nor there.
------------- "WAAAAAAOOOOOUGH! WAAAAAAAUUUUGGHHHH!! WAAAAAOOOO!!!"
-The Great Gig in the Sky
|
Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 16:16
This is a silly thread.
*locked*
|
Posted By: Gerinski
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 16:42
There will always be "prog", although the definition of prog has stretched so much that it's hard to say which of the sub-genres will survive longest, and for sure new sub-genres will appear which will have less and less to do with the original 70's prog. It's already becoming very hard to define what do we mean by "prog" and in the future it will become even more blurry.
Even if prog is a minority music, I can not follow up all what's coming out, PA is a great example of it, there's so much music in PA which I can not catch up with. So even if no more prog would be released as from today, I have no problem, I know there's more than enough already to keep me discovering new things until the day I die.
And in any case there will always be a minority group of people who will continue appreciating the classic 70's prog, even in the new generations, although probably they will become less and less.
|
Posted By: VanVanVan
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 16:44
Prog hasn't died yet, has it? ![Wink Wink](smileys/smiley2.gif)
------------- "The meaning of life is to give life meaning."-Arjen Lucassen
|
Posted By: Proletariat
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 17:36
Who cares?
Along side the artists who make mediocre ditties for radio there will always be an undercurrent of skilled musicians who make complex music. It has always been this way, though the style is not always the same. I am excited for whatever well composed and tallent driven music is produced, be it prog, jazz, folk, metal, alternative, bluegrass, classical, whatever.
------------- who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
|
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 21:06
VonSchlemmer wrote:
Do you think the genre will be able to go through another generation guys, or will music's ways just take its toll. ![Ermm Ermm](smileys/smiley24.gif) |
It has been growing strong and stronger for ever and ... that is the history of music for the last 2000 years. Nothing has changed.
Kinda strange that you would think something like this ... and I guess this whole "progressive" thing is not music, or a part of any music history!
All music comes and goes. That simple.
There is one difference. You forget that up until 1950 (let's say) music was an uppser class thing. The advent of the LP and then cassette and then CD changed the history of music forever ... it will never again be something that is decided by the upper classes as to what is good or not good that they can see and enjoy and no one else can. Popular music blew out the history of music forever ... and it will take another 50 years before it gets defined and clarified. I, personally, do not see how they will be able to separate a "composer" from a "group" anymore ... it's literally impossible to do so today. And add to that the fact that the number of "single person" composers is dwindled down to literally nothing and if you can name three of them (not the classics) ... it's a real miracle!
Essentially, I don't think that we need to bring in the next generation of prog. We need to help usher in the next generation of music regardless. As such it will be different, and some things might fit into the prog mold and some might not.
But, to be honest with you ... what scares me most, is that your term precludes a format that we would consider proper, and your children are going to say ... dad, you stink! ... that is not what I want to do, and that is not progressive. What we're doing is this, not that! ... and you gonna tell them they are wrong and help ruin their musican career? Because it doesn't sound like Beethoven, Stravinsky, Beatles or ELP? ... now look at the mirror and make a call as to who is not being very progressive! That would be you!
You don't bring in the next generation, except meet a woman, and have a child. And do your best. The rest is all about your love and care ... instead of your ideas! Just remember that!
------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
Posted By: WalterDigsTunes
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 21:09
moshkito wrote:
There is one difference. You forget that up until 1950 (let's say) music was an uppser class thing. |
Once again there is a glaring piece of insanity that sticks out from your roundabout blocks of text. Folk music, family pianos, bards, jazz venues... do these mean nothing to you?
|
Posted By: kenethlevine
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 21:15
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
moshkito wrote:
There is one difference. You forget that up until 1950 (let's say) music was an uppser class thing. |
Once again there is a glaring piece of insanity that sticks out from your roundabout blocks of text. Folk music, family pianos, bards, jazz venues... do these mean nothing to you?
|
even opera was originally a form for the great unwashed and only later became elite
|
Posted By: Zombywoof
Date Posted: June 30 2010 at 22:29
As long as there is a musical "norm", a small group of bands and artists will do everything possible to break it (hopefully). So, there will be a new generation.
------------- Continue the prog discussion here: http://zombyprog.proboards.com/index.cgi ...
|
Posted By: VonSchlemmer
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 04:44
Textbook wrote:
This is a silly thread.
*locked* |
Lolz.
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 05:43
I think there's only one proper way: kicking and screaming. ![Tongue Tongue](smileys/smiley17.gif) I'm wondering what it's going to take to bring some old holdouts into the next generation of prog. ![LOL LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif)
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Shevrzl
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 09:32
Tarquin Underspoon wrote:
Nah, there will always be some "prog" in some form or fashion. We just might not recognize it as prog if we were to hear it nowadays. Play some Porcupine Tree for a concert hall full of Yes fans in 1974. I guarantee they would not know what to make of it, and they would probably think it crap. The idea behind prog isn't going anywhere, but the music itself is constantly changing. |
Well put...![Approve Approve](smileys/smiley14.gif)
|
Posted By: AtomicCrimsonRush
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 09:40
locked thread? QED... anyway I am endeavouring to pass prog onto my children - thats one way of keeping it generational.
-------------
|
Posted By: TheGazzardian
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 09:53
Textbook wrote:
This is a silly thread.
*locked* |
You did it wrong!
|
Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 12:09
Prog-Core
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm
|
Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 13:06
The words in my signature say it all...................it's gonna carry on forever
------------- Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
Posted By: Manuel
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 16:46
I think prog-rock might at sometime disappear, or maybe survive, it's impossible to tell, but progressive music will not, since it has existed in the past, is quite alive at the present moment, and as long as there are good musicians who want to write good quality music and people who want to listen to it, there always be progressive music to be written and listened to.
|
Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 17:10
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 17:28
It was coughing up blood the other day, but it's gotten better. ![Tongue Tongue](smileys/smiley17.gif)
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 17:55
kenethlevine wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
moshkito wrote:
There is one difference. You forget that up until 1950 (let's say) music was an uppser class thing. |
Once again there is a glaring piece of insanity that sticks out from your roundabout blocks of text. Folk music, family pianos, bards, jazz venues... do these mean nothing to you?
|
even opera was originally a form for the great unwashed and only later became elite |
Too bad that you can not see the higher picture on this ... the majority of the histories of music that you read is pretty much the opposite and there have been many efforts over the centuries to break through it. Opera was indeed one of these, and many instrument were built away from the "classical music" concepts and eventually became accepted.
But in general, the musical/academic/conceptual definition of music still considers a lot of popular music not worthy and of valuable musical content, otherwise it would be taught more and discussed far more, than giving you what Bach and Beethoven are all about! In high school if you are stupid enough to take violin, they give you classical music pieces, not Ponty, or Way, or Shankar, or even Daniels or Kershaw! Does it make you wonder why so many end up in rock bands or somewhere else, but not in an orchestra?
Basically, the last 100 years music has changed ... it is no longer something only for the upper classes ... end of story, and you know it as well as I do, but you think your words are more important than mine. We're saying the same thing!
------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
Posted By: elder08
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 18:07
Hmmmm I am in a prog band where the members ages are 15 15 14 13 so yeah we know whats going on and we are trying to save it hahaha jk but seriously the new generation does have very little members that know what prog is but most are just like "Oh you guys are cool you listen to rush." And I say "Yeah I can look at genre listings on rockband also fa****" So people understand just not a lot
------------- "There are people who say we [Pink Floyd] should make room for younger bands. That's not the way it works. They can make their own room."- David Gilmour
|
Posted By: Prog_Traveller
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 18:14
To be honest I'm not quite sure what the OP means. I thought the next generation was already here. It seems like at least 75 percent of the members on this site are twenty years younger than me(and I'm 40 which is hardly old in the prog community). So I consider that a good thing. I like to see fresh blood in this genre. Often times at concerts and festivals I feel like I should be in foot pajamas or diapers most of the time and that's a scarey thing trust me!
Bands like Spock's Beard, the Flower Kings, Magenta, IZZ and Magic Pie are all pretty well known in prog circles(especially those into the newer symph prog scene) but none of them have really made a dent outside the prog world unlike say Porcupine Tree, Muse or Dream Theater. So as far as mainstream popularity goes I would say yes prog hasn't really made the big comeback yet but imo it doesn't really need to and I don't necessarily think that would be a good thing if it did. Right now it's not quite underground anymore but not mainstream either. It's sort of in some weird place in between but it seems pretty comfortable where it is. :)
|
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 20:08
"it's prog, just not as we know it"
|
Posted By: RoyFairbank
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 20:34
blah blah blah
I'm 21 and I DO NOT listen to modern music
"""PROG"""" OR NOT
if you take from my winamp a few months ago
(and I just got a new CPU in mid-March) my artists origin decade and
minus supergroups and solo artists you get:
1960s |
16 |
1970s |
24 |
1980s |
5 |
1990s |
2 |
2000s |
1 |
|
Posted By: The Monodrone
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 20:56
^ Which artist for the 2000s? ...curious
-------------
|
Posted By: Xanatos
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 21:19
Justin bieber or lil wayne xD!
|
Posted By: RoyFairbank
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 21:26
a band called Umphrees McGee (spelling?) my sister suggested. I've only listened to them once. I shouldn't have been so strict but these were internal tabulations (I have more if you want them ). The two nineties bands are Muse (If I remember, who I listened to a few times, that's it, just one album) and Phideaux (spelling?), who I've listened to a little and quite like so far. You can guess the 80s bands. IQ, Pallas, Marrillon are three.
For a brief while I had three other nineties bands on my winamp, but I thought I better minus them because they're not on anymore and I never listened to them: Echolyn, Jadis and Enchant.
|
Posted By: Prog_Traveller
Date Posted: July 02 2010 at 00:14
Well if you dig a little deeper on this website you'll find lots of good prog stuff from the past 25 years or so. The last two decades have actually been very good for prog.
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: July 02 2010 at 00:18
I actually expect prog to die out immediately one day. There will simply be no more prog bands
Ever.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: johnfripp
Date Posted: July 02 2010 at 00:55
i have a band and we are progressive or heavily influenced by prog so that count and i maybe a topic stating my oppinion on the rebirth of prog in bands such as dreamtheater porupine tree and others maybe you should check it out
|
Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: July 02 2010 at 02:09
I think that if we force children to study Genesis in school the apocalypse will be averted.
|
Posted By: VonSchlemmer
Date Posted: July 02 2010 at 06:36
Textbook wrote:
I think that if we force children to study Genesis in school the apocalypse will be averted. |
Teach them flute too, and how to play piano whilst stabbing it with knives and riding it like a horse.
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: July 02 2010 at 08:28
RoyFairbank wrote:
a band called Umphrees McGee (spelling?) my sister suggested. I've only listened to them once. I shouldn't have been so strict but these were internal tabulations (I have more if you want them ). The two nineties bands are Muse (If I remember, who I listened to a few times, that's it, just one album) and Phideaux (spelling?), who I've listened to a little and quite like so far. You can guess the 80s bands. IQ, Pallas, Marrillon are three.
For a brief while I had three other nineties bands on my winamp, but I thought I better minus them because they're not on anymore and I never listened to them: Echolyn, Jadis and Enchant.
|
Umphrey's is excellent IMHO. But I've said before that the beauty of sticking to previous decade(s), is that you don't have to bother with all the good new stuff out there so there's a good chance you will save yourself from bankrupcy. ![Tongue Tongue](smileys/smiley17.gif)
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: July 02 2010 at 18:35
RoyFairbank wrote:
blah blah blah
I'm 21 and I DO NOT listen to modern music """PROG"""" OR NOT
if you take from my winamp a few months ago (and I just got a new CPU in mid-March) my artists origin decade and minus supergroups and solo artists you get:
1960s |
16 |
1970s |
24 |
1980s |
5 |
1990s |
2 |
2000s |
1 |
|
I'm ok with this. But it makes me sad to see it.
The main reason why, is that it's like you and I saying something like this ... my child is stupid and he doesn't know music! ... and you only say that because you are in a bit of a time warp, and saw The Rocky Horror Picture Show one too many times!
There is good music today. A lot of it. However, the Internet tends to show everyone and their ma and pa and granny and chickens ... and this means that there is so much stuff out there that it will be very difficult to come up with a concensus as to what might be considered better or worse.
In general, all generations have music in one form or another ... we just prefer something over another and that's that ... but please ... do not go tell your child that he/she can not date someone because they have spiked hair and you don't like the music they play ... that hurts the ability to get better and create better music or art!
We need to give all generations their chance ... we had ours ... and it is "progressive" and then some ... and it was by far some of the best stuff of the whole century ... we got nothing to complaint about! But please, don't prevent your child/generation from getting into music and doing their own thing ... we got into "ours" with drugs (originally), a little mystic here and there and some people fighting the establishment that stood out ... most generations do not have the benefit of a counter culture to work and learn with! And simply become ants in an ant farm as a famous American writer said, or another judge used an even rougher term!
------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
Posted By: Progosopher
Date Posted: July 02 2010 at 20:15
As long as there are people who truly care about the music they create, whatever name we give to it, there will be Prog. But it may not be a form that we oldtimers (I am now 50) easily recognize. We will always have artists. New generations will use tools that older generations did not have. These tools often take the form of technology. Yes, there will be, and currently are, programs that will help the amature sound better - and some of them sound absolutely awesome, but ultimately creativity is not up to the tool but to the individual using it. The next generation will find it themselves if they really want to, with or without our help. But again, we may not recognize what they do. . .
------------- The world of sound is certainly capable of infinite variety and, were our sense developed, of infinite extensions. -- George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty"
|
Posted By: VanVanVan
Date Posted: July 02 2010 at 21:27
Haha, a retro purist, eh? To each his own... ![Wink Wink](smileys/smiley2.gif)
------------- "The meaning of life is to give life meaning."-Arjen Lucassen
|
Posted By: The Monodrone
Date Posted: July 02 2010 at 21:48
If prog dies, I shall die alongside it! ![Approve Approve](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley14.gif)
-------------
|
Posted By: KoS
Date Posted: July 02 2010 at 22:42
stonebeard wrote:
I actually expect prog to die out immediately one day. There will simply be no more prog bands
Ever.
| Haven't you read a lot of this thread? There have been no prog bands since the '70's.
|
|