im shocked about piracy
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
Forum Description: Discuss specific prog bands and their members or a specific sub-genre
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6538
Printed Date: November 22 2024 at 08:48 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: im shocked about piracy
Posted By: arqwave
Subject: im shocked about piracy
Date Posted: May 23 2005 at 13:43
Hi again, i've been out for quite a while... and i got shocked by a review about the new DT record: Octavarium... (and the insults too, hahaha) I'm not a saint and of course i'm far from it, but where are we going by downloading music from an album that hasn't reach the streets, and sadly damaging the beloved artist. To be honest i had to check out the source, and gladly (¿?) found out that the songs are from the James LaBrie record ELEMENTS OF PERSUASION, however, our thirst of music has gone beyond our ethics, and to me, buying an original record is a very important thing, not for the media, but for myself, i'm an architect and i would be very dissapointed if someone publish or copy my designs without my permission, even if that person is a fan trying to help me.
peace
------------- between darkness and light
|
Replies:
Posted By: Man With Hat
Date Posted: May 23 2005 at 18:41
I completely agree. People are as*h*les, and ruthless.
You gotta love todays socitey.
------------- Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
|
Posted By: Reverie
Date Posted: May 23 2005 at 20:08
I agree that it is bad to download entire albums without buying them also. I don't have such an issue with people who will go and and buy the album (eg Octavarium) after they download leaks or whatever, but really i don't think whole albums need to be downloaded in the first place.
The way i do it is i download a song or two or three (depending on the size of the album) and if i like what i hear enough i'll buy the album. That way i think i'm getting fair representation of the feel of the album. I have no moral issues with the way i do things in the slightest, and i really do think such methods have benifitted some bands. Whole albums though? Not for me. For one, it ruins the listening experience of when i finally get the album and pop it into my stereo or what ever.
|
Posted By: valravennz
Date Posted: May 23 2005 at 20:28
Reverie wrote:
I agree that it is bad to download entire albums without buying them also. I don't have such an issue with people who will go and and buy the album (eg Octavarium) after they download leaks or whatever, but really i don't think whole albums need to be downloaded in the first place.
The way i do it is i download a song or two or three (depending on the size of the album) and if i like what i hear enough i'll buy the album. That way i think i'm getting fair representation of the feel of the album. I have no moral issues with the way i do things in the slightest, and i really do think such methods have benifitted some bands. Whole albums though? Not for me. For one, it ruins the listening experience of when i finally get the album and pop it into my stereo or what ever.
|
I totally agree with what you have said. Downloading one or two songs from an album I feel is a great way of determining whether you will like the album or not. That is how I do it and if I like what I hear then I will go out and buy the album. Unfortunately, there are many who do not go by this method and it is bad news for the bands who are the big losers in the end. I like the samples that are on this site and because of this I have expanded my CD collection somewhat and tried out new prog that I normally would not listen to. I only wish others would use some common sense and realize that they are not doing their favourite bands a favour by downloading entire albums off the Net.
-------------
"Music is the Wine that fills the cup of Silence"
- Robert Fripp
|
Posted By: con safo
Date Posted: May 23 2005 at 21:21
Piracy Rules
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 23 2005 at 23:44
I refuse to buy albums without listening a representative number of songs from it, I already wasted too much money in crap before Internet existed.
BTW: I never bought more CD's than when Audio Galaxy was alive, thanks to them I found about at least 60 or 70 bands, and bought albums of most of them.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: con safo
Date Posted: May 23 2005 at 23:45
If it wasn't for Internet Piracy i wouldnt own half the albums i do.
-------------
|
Posted By: BigBoss
Date Posted: May 24 2005 at 12:58
www.mindawn.com - electronic music service that allows you to hear any song, in full, up to 3 times. No need to break the law by pirating music if you just want to review it.
------------- Best Regards,
Shawn Gordon
President
ProgRock Records
www.progrockrecords.com
www.mindawn.com
|
Posted By: ita_prog_fan
Date Posted: May 24 2005 at 14:02
Posted By: ExquisiteCorpse
Date Posted: May 24 2005 at 15:08
i think that, as Reverie pointed out, theres no prob with downloading
an album to get it early, and then actually buying the album legally
once its actually released.
Anyways I like to have the album art, liner notes, yadda yadda yadda and you dont get thatfrom P2P.
And of course most of the p2p programs with enough users to satisfy me
( kazaa, limewire) wreck your comp and my parents wont let me do it
anyway
------------- No, her name is not Beatrice.
Yes, it's true: Movon invented cancer.
Josh and Peanut for President in '06!
|
Posted By: Hiwatter
Date Posted: May 24 2005 at 20:14
Winmx is the way .
If i hadnt downloaded mp3s, i would have perhaps 20% of the albums i have now.
|
Posted By: ExquisiteCorpse
Date Posted: May 24 2005 at 20:48
also what about renting cd's/getting them from the library and copying them on yur comp?
And what about bands that arent around any more or are dead and dont make any money anymore anyway from the music?
------------- No, her name is not Beatrice.
Yes, it's true: Movon invented cancer.
Josh and Peanut for President in '06!
|
Posted By: Hierophant
Date Posted: May 24 2005 at 22:19
DC++ has about everyband you can think of - if you connect to enough hubs.
|
Posted By: Pathetique
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 02:48
I like bit torent because I feel like I'm shareing and not just takeing. As for anyone trying to get into the music biz all that will save you is Rum and Gold. I got the new DT album the week after they got done mastering it, same thing with Nine inch nails ect.
------------- The Steve
prog-metal radio on www.wcrx.net,
monday 9-midnight CST
|
Posted By: Valarius
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 04:51
I may download a song or two, but I'll only really buy CD's.
|
Posted By: limeyrob
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 14:27
Piracy is a problem. That's why this site is so good. Suggest to any labels/bands tuned in to use it. It has certainly improved my collection no end. I must have bought more than a 100 CDs since finding this site.
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 14:47
Me too. My problem is that I don't have enough funds to buy many CD's, but have an appetite for new stuff, or stuff I've already got on vinyl. Some stuff is hard to find to buy anyway!
Come to that some of the stuff that we like here is hard to find P2P!
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: ita_prog_fan
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 14:56
Snow Dog wrote:
Me too. My problem is that I don't have enough funds to buy many CD's, but have an appetite for new stuff, or stuff I've already got on vinyl. Some stuff is hard to find to buy anyway!
Come to that some of the stuff that we like here is hard to find P2P!
|
Very Hard To Find P2P... and in a CD store TOO !!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Posted By: Paradox
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 16:47
Piracy is a two sided coin. It's a great way for people to get introduced to new/old music that they would probably never buy. Yes, a lot of people probably won't buy anything by those bands, but a lot of people will.
|
Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 17:35
Paradox wrote:
Piracy is a two sided coin. It's a great way for people to get introduced to new/old music that they would probably never buy. Yes, a lot of people probably won't buy anything by those bands, but a lot of people will.
|
Welcome back Paradox.
|
Posted By: goose
Date Posted: May 26 2005 at 05:50
Hierophant wrote:
DC++ has about everyband you can think of - if you connect to enough hubs.
|
Soulseek, man!
|
Posted By: con safo
Date Posted: May 26 2005 at 12:14
DC++ is excellent. I got fed up with soulseek and how unreliable it can be.
-------------
|
Posted By: Paradox
Date Posted: May 29 2005 at 10:19
gdub411 wrote:
Welcome back Paradox.
|
Thanks! It's been quite a while
-------------
|
Posted By: Borealis
Date Posted: May 29 2005 at 14:15
Who would buy an album he never herd of? I'd never have bought most CD I own without downloading songs on that particullar album. Also, with the awful pop surrounding the medias, I would only know, like, Dream Theater . And there are so many bands that I can't find their albums (Never found Anglagard albums), and the only way I know to listen to them is by internet. It's also the best for underground band to get known, as they can't count on TV or radio for that.
Without that, we would be able to listen as much as we'd like. I'm 16, no money, unfortunatly. I want to listen to more than 1-2 CD per months...
Music piracy is the best that happened to music, really. At least, these days.
------------- Vive le Québec libre!...
|
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: May 31 2005 at 18:34
Piracy has its good points, for example there are so many deleted albums that i like and enjoy , and cannot buy anywhere for love nor money. The net is a great place to get these classic, but sometimes obscure albums: and i will never apologise for downloading them.
|
Posted By: Pir2
Date Posted: May 31 2005 at 23:02
when a herad two song of an album that have 5 or six, and this two sng
are really good, i buy the cd (if ai get the cash, it dos'n happen so
often), and i find that the other 3 songs are acrap, and this 3 song
are more than 70% of the cd (by example), i was los my money, so i get
the full album if i don`t know very well to the artist, and then i
decide if i´ll buy it, befre that, i don´t (at least i'd heard the full
album on the radio, like a have problem with my memry, i only knw that
it`s good, the rest, nly bying i remember)
|
Posted By: Gaston
Date Posted: June 01 2005 at 23:00
When the record industry and the internet industry merge the ISPs will
pay the record industry for piracy. ISPs will raise prices, CDs
will...raise prices, everyone will be happy.....
People are going to download. So what I've just described is only a matter of time. People just won't stop.
Gaston
-------------
It's the same guy. Great minds think alike.
|
Posted By: Cluster One
Date Posted: June 02 2005 at 03:36
Hmm, Piracy shocks me too. I'm just surprised nobody has posted any pics as of yet...
------------- Marmalade...I like marmalade.
|
Posted By: Lamia
Date Posted: June 02 2005 at 11:11
I do admit that I have committed several acts of aural
piracy, but I’ve certainly bought a lot of albums since. Up until 1999, I
was never really into music much, didn't have any CD's at all, then I bought my
first album, Toploader - Onka's Big Moka. Surprisingly I can still look
back on it and listen to it and appreciate it, at least it was half decent
music and nothing too faddy.
But since 1999 I've amassed over 100 or so albums, and when you think of the
average price that's going to be around £1000 at £10 a shot. So actually
on average I buy an album or so every month, although its more phase like, i.e.
I won't buy music for a while and then get a load in.
However certainly without piracy in the form of Audio Galaxy, WinMX, Kazaa
Lite, Limewire and now Bit Comet I wouldn't have gone out and bought many of
the albums I have now. However I do have a lot of copied music from
friends, parents etc and I just don't see the point it buying the same thing
over and over again if we all seem to have it. For instance, although my
parents are divorced, between us we each have a legitimate copy of Phil Collins
- Testify, which is utterly ridiculous.
I do however understand that music is certainly very expensive and it comes at
a premium, so recently I’ve started downloading music from www.allofmp3.com,
and legit Russian website that charges for music downloads, but because of
Russian copyright laws you can get an entire album for $1.5 dollars @192 kbps
in mp3, WMA, Ogg Vorbis and several others. Ok you don't get the album
art, but at least you’re giving something back and technically it is
legal. With regards to this I've bought quite a few progressive albums
since coming here. And I'm glad, because despite being a big Genesis fan
I bought both Archives’ 1969-1975 and 1976-1992 and on the first one the first
2 CD's were effectively a polished Lamb Lies Down, the third CD Genesis Live
with a few others, and the last was some very early Genesis, with pretty damn
poor studio recording quality. I have since listed to the original CD's
of this and for costing £40 the quality was not distinguishably better.
So there are reasons for piracy, but it is a double edged
sword, I just think its partly greed by the music industry and greed by the
consumer that makes this so expensive. However
that doesn’t stop me having 5,869 songs on my computer, about 4,000 of which
are from legit CD’s i.e. parents and friends and the rest are illegal
downloads.
------------- Tell me my life is about to begin
Tell me that I am a hero,
Promise me all of your violent dreams
Light up your body with anger.
Genesis - The Knife
|
Posted By: Borealis
Date Posted: June 02 2005 at 16:58
I believe real musician prefer to be known than to be rich.
------------- Vive le Québec libre!...
|
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: June 02 2005 at 17:04
Lamia wrote:
... I just think its partly greed by the music industry and greed by the consumer that makes this so expensive. However that doesn’t stop me having 5,869 songs on my computer, about 4,000 of which are from legit CD’s i.e. parents and friends and the rest are illegal downloads.
|
Remember that the songs from "legit CD's" are illegit copies unless they're from YOUR CDs...
*BUSTED!!!*
|
Posted By: Syntharachnid
Date Posted: June 02 2005 at 22:36
My view is one of a minimalist collector. (Does that make sense?) If I have the album in one format (ie: if my dad has it on vinyl), I am willing to download it. As a result, I have taken to buying albums on viynl because I prefer it to CDs, then downloading it via Bittorrent (by far the best and most relyable program for this purpose). I now have a copy which I can store on my iPod for portability and convinience, and one which will not deteriorate over time.
-------------
|
Posted By: Syntharachnid
Date Posted: June 02 2005 at 22:38
Also, I have some friends who listen to awful music, so I am willing to burn them copies of good CDs, just to try and civilize them!
-------------
|
Posted By: FishyMonkey
Date Posted: June 04 2005 at 01:22
See, without piracy I wouldn't be into any of the great bands I'm into
now. Samples and what not just aren't good neough sometimes. For
example, King Crimson took awhile to sink in...now I love them and have
already ordered Red and ITCHYCOCK. I agree, however, that people who
simply download and never actually buy are horrible. The only
justification would be if you had NO money and stil lwanted to listen
to music. Then again, if you had no money you probably wouldn't have a
computer.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/FishyMonkey/?chartstyle=artists">
|
Posted By: goose
Date Posted: June 04 2005 at 06:12
I have started downloading OOP stuff - maybe if I get a decent enough collection one day I'll try and start up an FTP server with that sort of thing on... the only difficulty is finding lossless rips . It's still illegal if they're OOP but I couldn't buy them if I tried (except second hand, and that doesn't help the record label ), so I feel justified.
|
Posted By: goose
Date Posted: June 04 2005 at 06:14
Certif1ed wrote:
*BUSTED!!!* |
?
|
Posted By: undefinability
Date Posted: June 05 2005 at 07:34
This has probably already been stated, but as I've said before, I rarely read the comments before mine unless they have something interesting (no offense). . .
I don't think it's so much as the fanatics are downloading because they're poor or just refuse to buy the album, but rather that they're anticipating the said release so badly that they can't wait for it to be issued, so in the end, they try to download it in order to get a taste for the piece(s) - and I suppose you could say that the 30-second samples would be sufficient, but to be candid, they aren't. . . they just add to the eagerness.
------------- "Don't listen to me."
[IMG]http://www.freewebs.com/shahath/shadowid.jpg">
|
Posted By: Jared
Date Posted: June 05 2005 at 10:58
Quoting from Shadow Gallery's latest:
"A solid nod of gratitude goes out to those who bought this disc, seperating yourselves from those who copy it."
Here, Here...
------------- Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
|
Posted By: BigBoss
Date Posted: June 21 2005 at 11:55
You do realize that allofmp3.com is a total pirate site? They are charging you and keeping the money, they aren't paying the artist, you are simply lining their pockets, there is nothing legit about it. You're actually better off pirating it totally instead of paying someone to steal it for you.
Lamia wrote:
<p ="Msonormal">I do admit that I have committed several acts of aural
piracy, but I’ve certainly bought a lot of albums since. Up until 1999, I
was never really into music much, didn't have any CD's at all, then I bought my
first album, Toploader - Onka's Big Moka. Surprisingly I can still look
back on it and listen to it and appreciate it, at least it was half decent
music and nothing too faddy.
But since 1999 I've amassed over 100 or so albums, and when you think of the
average price that's going to be around £1000 at £10 a shot. So actually
on average I buy an album or so every month, although its more phase like, i.e.
I won't buy music for a while and then get a load in.
However certainly without piracy in the form of Audio Galaxy, WinMX, Kazaa
Lite, Limewire and now Bit Comet I wouldn't have gone out and bought many of
the albums I have now. However I do have a lot of copied music from
friends, parents etc and I just don't see the point it buying the same thing
over and over again if we all seem to have it. For instance, although my
parents are divorced, between us we each have a legitimate copy of Phil Collins
- Testify, which is utterly ridiculous.
I do however understand that music is certainly very expensive and it comes at
a premium, so recently I’ve started downloading music from www.allofmp3.com,
and legit Russian website that charges for music downloads, but because of
Russian copyright laws you can get an entire album for $1.5 dollars @192 kbps
in mp3, WMA, Ogg Vorbis and several others. Ok you don't get the album
art, but at least you’re giving something back and technically it is
legal. With regards to this I've bought quite a few progressive albums
since coming here. And I'm glad, because despite being a big Genesis fan
I bought both Archives’ 1969-1975 and 1976-1992 and on the first one the first
2 CD's were effectively a polished Lamb Lies Down, the third CD Genesis Live
with a few others, and the last was some very early Genesis, with pretty damn
poor studio recording quality. I have since listed to the original CD's
of this and for costing £40 the quality was not distinguishably better.
<p ="Msonormal"><o:p> </o:p>
<p ="Msonormal">So there are reasons for piracy, but it is a double edged
sword, I just think its partly greed by the music industry and greed by the
consumer that makes this so expensive. <span style=""> </span>However
that doesn’t stop me having 5,869 songs on my computer, about 4,000 of which
are from legit CD’s i.e. parents and friends and the rest are illegal
downloads.
|
------------- Best Regards,
Shawn Gordon
President
ProgRock Records
www.progrockrecords.com
www.mindawn.com
|
Posted By: con safo
Date Posted: June 21 2005 at 12:56
The only people losing sleep over piracy are greedy rock stars and recorc company execs. They can sufffer for all i care. Britney Spears losing 1 million in record sales doesnt bother me one bit, and i could care less if lars ulrich cant afford his new gold plated hot tub. Boo-Hoo. Music Piracy gets more deserving bands the recognition they deserve. It's the best thing to happen to music, like it or not.
-------------
|
Posted By: SomethingGood
Date Posted: June 21 2005 at 13:22
Borealis wrote:
I believe real musician prefer to be known than to be rich. |
sums it up perfectly.
here's an interesting statistic:
When you buy a Major Label CD for £17.99...
- about £1 goes to the band.
- about £5 goes to HMV/Virgin etc.
- about £1 goes to the artists for the cover art
- £10.99 goes to the record label, who then use the money to sue people.
...of course, the above is not true with all record labels, but it is
true for a vast majority. piracy really doesn't affect the musicians as
much as we are led to believe.
|
Posted By: Wizard/TRueStar
Date Posted: June 21 2005 at 13:49
ExquisiteCorpse wrote:
also what about renting cd's/getting them from the library and copying them on yur comp?
And what about bands that arent around any more or are dead and dont make any money anymore anyway from the music?
|
Oh man........I was doing that when I read this
|
|