Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: General Music Discussions
Forum Description: Discuss and create polls about all types of music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=62999 Printed Date: December 04 2024 at 20:31 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: What genre is prog's foe ?Posted By: progrules
Subject: What genre is prog's foe ?
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 06:37
Most of the mentioned genres are in my opinion more or less antipoles of prog.
But which is the biggest in your opinion ? And please explain.
------------- A day without prog is a wasted day
Replies: Posted By: snobb
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 06:58
Voted for punk. Not because I hate it ( I like many early punk bands, especially The Stranglers), but because of logic: one of main prog characteristics is long complex compositions. Main punk characteristic is short simplistic ones.
Ideologically the answer could be "pop-music", but there are too many different things under that name, and some neo-prog or symphonic prog songs are not too far from pop-music as well.
Posted By: friso
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 07:08
The Disco made rock disappear in the late seventies, so they must be the enemy of progressive rock. Punk would also be a good candidate, for they had there contribution too. Nowadays there are no genres that are the enemy of progressive music, it's the media. They never show progressive music on television, they never play it on the radio stations and they will never mention it in the press.
It has been argued that progressive music and good rock music in general is to hard to control to get a steady music market. As if they are doing fine now...
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 07:08
I'd say hip hop and rap are furthest away from prog, both in musicial terms, and in terms of the spirit and outlook behind the music.
You'll be able to find prog that has elements of all the musical genres listed above, but I can think of very little hip hop/rap influence in prog. The closest I can think of, is the rap in 'Roll the bones' by Rush, and that doesn't really sound very hip hop to me, although by all accounts Rush did consider approaching a famous rapper, at the time, to do the rap. I think they even considered asking John Cleese to do it!
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 07:31
I'd say Country. Not to be too reductionist about it, but I gather that a primary aim of Country music is to take familiar music forms and color them with different shades of lyrical emotion. "Progression" is not the aim, the aim is "execution" and maximal emotional impact.
On the other hand, I gather that the primary aim of Progressive Rock is "Boundary stretching" - defying the "familiar" (or at worst, blatantly copying those who do) and supplying the emotional impact not necessarily through the lyrical message, but in the suprise factor supplied by the music.
------------- My other avatar is a Porsche
It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.
-Kehlog Albran
Posted By: domizia
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 08:12
I'm going for punk, history is there to show that punk was really effective in swiping away most prog-oriented philosophy, musically speaking.
------------- RPI=> http://www.camelotclubprog.net" rel="nofollow - Camelot Club Prog ...but also> http://www.maracash.com" rel="nofollow - MaRaCash records.
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 08:31
I'm not so sure musical genres can really be 'foes' of each other, I happen to enjoy certain bands from almost every genre listed here, besides any of these genres can be combined with Progressive Rock to make excellent music.
punk + prog = early Devo, T Heads, XTC, No Means No, Victims Family
hip-hop + prog = Public Enemy, Disposable heroes of Hiphoprisy, Burning Spear
soul + prog = Stevie Wonder, Isaac Hayes, early EW&F, Marvin Gayes' Whats Goin On
prog + country = Allman Brothers, Phish, Dave Matthews, Govt Mule, Capt Beefheart, Bela Fleck, newgrass/jazz fusion
disco + prog = Giorgio Moroder, Kraftwerk, IDM, Parliament
prog + pop = Paul Simon, Sting, Stevie Wonder, Peter Gabriel, Genesis
thrash metal + prog = about half the bands that will be added to the site today, ha ha, just kidding.
RnB + prog = Prince, Steely Dan, Funkadelic, Santana, Mandrill, early Chicago
Tear jerkers + prog = The Moody Blues, John Cale
Reggae + prog = Dub Reggae, Bill Laswell, Creation Rebel
and so on ...
This is just my opinion, but I don't think musical styles can be foes.
Posted By: Morningrise
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 08:49
Voted for Punk. While Prog flies the flag for long, complex compositions, and its main figures are recognised virtuosos with a constant need of showing off, punk reprensented a going back to the basics (musically speaking). Shame on the Ramones!
Posted By: JayDee
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 08:52
Easy Money wrote:
I don't think musical styles can be foes.
Yes sir.
-------------
Posted By: jampa17
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 10:03
I think country is conceptually the opposite... it's a very emotional oriented music, in which just an acoustic guitar alone could work as well as a whole ensamble... is not that I don't like it, I can appriciate a little of country, but the need of a particular atmosphere and expermentation is the complete opposite to country...
It's not that their antipoles, is just that the concept of the genre is much more different than the others...
-------------
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Posted By: manofmystery
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 10:07
prog has been it's own worst enemy since the end of the 70s
-------------
Time always wins.
Posted By: Mellotron Storm
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 11:01
I don't think country music or rap are enemies of Prog but man both blow big time.
------------- "The wind is slowly tearing her apart"
"Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN
Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 11:13
It's like Prog vs. Country in the cage match of the century. Willie Nelson keeps beating Keith Emerson with his already delapitated guitar while Keith desperately tries to lift his mellotron. Luckily, Peter Gabriel's fey ninja abilities emerge and a blade emerges from his flute. Nelson's eyes widen in fear....tune in next time.
------------- You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 11:14
I will vote for mainstream country, since I hate it.
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 11:19
All of them are a constant assault on my ears and an affront to human decency.
I vote for them to be destroyed, to make the world safe for prog.
Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 11:20
Because I consider the hybridization of musical styles to be a defining characteristic of progressive rock, I don't believe that any genre is the enemy of progressive rock -- all musical styles can be incorporated into progressive rock.
------------- https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts
Posted By: Mellotron Storm
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 11:42
Padraic wrote:
All of them are a constant assault on my ears and an affront to human decency.
I vote for them to be destroyed, to make the world safe for prog.
------------- "The wind is slowly tearing her apart"
"Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN
Posted By: Mellotron Storm
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 11:50
Logan wrote:
Because I consider the hybridization of musical styles to be a defining characteristic of progressive rock, I don't believe that any genre is the enemy of progressive rock -- all musical styles can be incorporated into progressive rock.
I think what you and Easy Money state are true,but when it comes to the non-progressive,commercial slop that we usually hear from the above genres,no way,they all make me throw up in mouth a little bit.
------------- "The wind is slowly tearing her apart"
"Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN
Posted By: jampa17
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 12:15
sinkadotentree wrote:
Logan wrote:
Because I consider the hybridization of musical styles to be a defining characteristic of progressive rock, I don't believe that any genre is the enemy of progressive rock -- all musical styles can be incorporated into progressive rock.
I think what you and Easy Money state are true,but when it comes to the non-progressive,commercial slop that we usually hear from the above genres,no way,they all make me throw up in mouth a little bit.
Exactly my feeling... Is not like enemies or something like that... but to be honest, there's so few exploration in the other commercial stuff that seems so boring and ugly... so... as Pedriac proclaimed: lets start the haunting... lets destroy all that other genres... we are few, but are stronger and smarter than them...!!!
-------------
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 12:43
sinkadotentree wrote:
Logan wrote:
Because I consider the hybridization
of musical styles to be a defining characteristic of progressive rock,
I don't believe that any genre is the enemy of progressive rock -- all
musical styles can be incorporated into progressive rock.
I think what you and Easy Money state are true,but when it comes
to the non-progressive,commercial slop that we usually hear from the
above genres,no way,they all make me throw up in mouth a little bit.
This is 99% percent digression...
Whatever one's personal reaction to various types music, and commercial pablum, I just can't think of such music being the enemy of Prog. It may be your, sort of, enemy to good taste. Prog can create an amazing synthesis of styles. In terms of the antithesis of Prog, sometimes I use the term gorP (regressive Prog) to describe a non-progressive attitude towards rock (and towards "generically-speaking" Prog). Rather like with Manofmystery's statement, though I would not use such temporal limits, I think that Prog (as a genre) -- or more specifically those Prog-by-numbers bands -- could be considered the enemy of Prog. Prog, I think, is partially about expanding the parameters of the rock universe, and part of that is having a non-generic approach. Trying to sound and be Prog can kill that experimental approach that was important to the movement.
I don't think "progressive rock" needs to be originative (I look at it as building on other work to create something new), but it can be innovative in how it combines and plays with its influences. Convention can be the enemy of Prog (mainstream music is conventional in approach, whereas Prog often took an unconventional approach to music).
To say that commercialism (or really commercial restraints, and convention) is the enemy of progressive music, and that commerce (the industry) can be the enemy of art makes some sense. It's too simplistic since progressive rock can be commercial, but... While not a genre, so I'm being rather irrelevant, I have opined that convention (being conventional and following convention) is the enemy of progressive music. Prog does not need to break new ground, but a progressive approach expands on the possibilities of what rock can be. It can defy typical rock conventions and bring in an unconventional approach. Part of that has been by drawing on past non-rock styles, as well as unusual for rock instrumentation etc.. In some ways it can be regressive in utilising music from times past, but ultimately it's progressive in a rock framework if it expands those rock frontiers.
Sorry for rambling, and being repetitive. I can't seem to wake up properly. Without so-called non-progressive music, progressive rock would not be recognised. The problem is, the more genrefied and defined Prog becomes as a style, the more it can be impeded in terms of what it can be and do. So in a way, I really do look at Progressive Rock as a genre as being the enemy of progressive rock as an approach to music.
------------- https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts
Posted By: infandous
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 13:00
Logan wrote:
Without so-called non-progressive music, progressive rock would not be recognised. The problem is, the more genrefied and defined Prog becomes as a style, the more it can be impeded in terms of what it can be and do. So in a way, I really do look at Progressive Rock as a genre as being the enemy of progressive rock as an approach to music.
Agree with this 100%. However, I happen to quite enjoy a lot of what could be called "formulaic" prog rock. But I understand this is not the same as progressive rock, in the literal sense. But this question, "What genre is prog's foe?", is answered quite easily. None of them.
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 13:12
anything you don't like, elevator muzak, Starbuck's albums, ring-tones, radio jingles, tonic-subdominant-dominant, the neighbour's TV, the Neighbours theme tune, Tony Hatch and Jackie Trent, James Last, James Blunt, James, Not Now James, We're Busy, Travis, the middle-8, sparrow farts, dripping taps, air-conditioning, boredom, a drummer in a pub, a drummer on a long car journey, living nextdoor to a drummer, "The Wheels On The Bus", Bontempi keyboards, the sound your car keys make when you drop them down a grating, the sound you make when you hear the sound of your car keys dropping down a grating, the sound everyone else makes when they hear the sound you make when you hear the sound of your car keys dropping down a grating, relaxation discs, Karaoke, pub singers, whale songs, wail songs, wales songs, eisteddfodau, songs that fade out, "Cashier Number Five Please", Dukes of Hazzard air-horns, mopeds, diesel engines, the Piaggio Ape, The Eurovision Song Contest, The Balkan block-vote, Terry Wogan, The Floral Dance, Line dancing, Tap dancing, Morris Dancing, Moris dancing, Morris Minor, D Minor, C Major, Drum Majors, marching bands, The Dagenham Girl Pipers, Billie Piper, "Billie Don't Be A Hero", Blacklace, The Macarena, macaroni, maracas, St Winifred's School Choir, songs that fade back in again, The Choir Invisible, Carol Of The Bells, Carol singers, Carol Vordeman and the Countdown clock, Lord Voldemort, The New Vaudeville Band, Winchester chimes, wind chimes, hand bells, door bells, sleigh bells, schnitzel with noodles, gamelans, campanology, one-man bands, whistling postmen, Alan Smethurst, Guitar Hero, GarageBand, Autotune, ProTools, FruityLoops, Rice Krispies, Cheerios, Toot Sweets, Popping Candy, Pop Tarts, Girls Aloud, penny whistles, bagpipes, bodhráns, tambourines, the triangle, singers who sing with their finger in their right ear, singers who sing with their fingers in their left ear, tin whistles, tinnitus, tin pan alley, barber-shop quartets, glee singers, barbershop quintets, musical greetings cards, musicals, music halls, dance halls, thin walls, steel bands, steel guitar, steel combs on glass and squeeky wheels on shopping trolleys.
------------- What?
Posted By: Scratchy
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 13:51
It is not that easy these days.Disco was the main commercial challenge to rock music in general in the mid seventies.Punk took over gradually took over the media attention away from the alternative side of rock away from Prog / 70's(Led Zep etc.influenced metal).Some of the more popular side of Prog influenced groups incorporated Disco into their sound i.e. ELO, Bowie, Queen.I know there were protests in the USA about Disco music due to the fact it was increasingly replacing rock music on some radio stations (at sporting events etc).In the UK most rock music on radio, at the time, was pop (beat) oriented anyway, therefore there wasn't such an outrage, early disco was funk based therefore didn't sound that different.
The Punk v. Prog was a little bit phoney really & ws initiated by the indie music press (prog had very little independant press at the time).It was mainly about gaining as much of the rapidly reducing rock market.It must be remembered that lot of early Prog & Punk roots were the same - mid 60's garage rock.As time went on alot of Prog groups drifted away from their earlier roots, which helped essentiate the differences between Prog & Punk.Metal also had started to seperate away from the earlier close association with early Prog.Hard rock / pop rock bands either started to harden their sound & become part of the metal movement or become part of the looser sounding Punk movement.
In the early '80's NWOBHM, New wave & later general Alternative rock (hardcore etc.) developed, which all incorporated elements of Prog in their music to a certain degree, as well as Punk.These rock developements also helped form the Neo-prog genre.Alternative rock diversified greatly as time went on & increasingly to this day.Thrash & Death Metal grew out NWOBHM & could be said ensuated the more hardcore punk influences.Death metal has helped form new Progressive influenced rock movements.
Alot of music these days has a large disparity of noise i.e. Electronica - Synth pop (disco sounding without the guitars) to Ambient Techno (which has alot of similarity to Progressive Electronic).Indie rock has a very wide compass of sounds also.Indie (music in general) is supposedly meant to have it's roots in Punk, if you listen to the media, but actually incorporates a wide variety of sounds started from the 60's, '70's & beyond (the diversity grows by the day), although the majority of Indie groups seem to have a narrow pop sound, the Flaming Lips etc.have alot of Prog in their sound.Some Emo rock has recently incorporated progressive rock into their sound (i.e. Coheed & Cumbria), Post - hardcore similar ( Mars Volta).
It is hard to say what Punk (Alternative) or Prog is these days.There seems to be a lot of cross fertilisation.
As Prog rock followers (most of us?) can appretiate the enormous benefit '70's Prog has had on the developement of rock (& other genres of music).It is about time it was shown more respect by the Media generally.
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 13:59
Any genre that requires people to feel normal, non-special, to have friends, and a social life.
-------------
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 14:07
I wouldn't say any of those are really the antipole. I see music more as a matrix.
Now would you like the red pill or the blue one?
In the Dean's list, I'd probably go with elevator muzak. Did I miss something? He left out kazoo....
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Posted By: Progosopher
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 14:16
I would have to say Punk for historical reasons. Prog was big in the early 70s, but there was a backlash to its own extremism. Punk was at the forefront of that backlash. Prog bands bragged, so to speak, about 20 minute songs, but when the Rolling Stone magazine first reviewed a Ramones concert, they gushed about how nothing was really longer than 14 seconds. I happen to like the Ramones, and the Sex Pistols too (where would IQ be without them?), but that's about as far as my punk tastes go. I assert that good music is good music, no matter what genre we put it in, and that we always have the right to like what we like.
------------- The world of sound is certainly capable of infinite variety and, were our sense developed, of infinite extensions. -- George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty"
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 15:11
manofmystery wrote:
prog has been it's own worst enemy since the end of the 70s
Posted By: J-Man
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 15:22
Hip Hop, only because it is the only type of "music" that's up there and can never be a form of art.
-------------
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime" rel="nofollow - http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime
Posted By: akamaisondufromage
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 15:22
Well it certainly isn't Punk. Punk to a certain extent gave all music (not just prog) a kick up the butt. And I'm pretty sure that for Prog it made prog realise it couldn't just carry on doing the same stuff ad finitum (Should that be ad nauseum - didn't do latin at school) AND a lot of prog/ metal etc incorporated ideas and attitudes and even the music of many punk bands) In some cases it works the other way such as with The fall and Can: if you count Can as prog?
None of these should be the enemy of prog.
------------- Help me I'm falling!
Posted By: ten years after
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 15:43
Strangely, there are some bands on the Prog Archives who are the opposite of progressive rock IMO. This refers to the traditional music dominated folk bands such as Pentangle (who once stated proudly that no electric instruments were used on an album).
I like folk music a lot, including Pentangle, but when it restricts itself mostly to traditional forms it should not be counted as Progressive.
Posted By: King Crimson776
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 15:59
Not punk. Prog and punk often have an anti-establishment, non-conformist attitude, so they have that in common even though musically they are opposites. I'd say Disco more than anything because it is pure conformism, and is not "difficult music" in any way.
Posted By: snobb
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 15:59
It's funny, that our collegues from States mostly think that main prog enemy is (was) country or hip-hop. We there in Europe mostly think that it is punk. The reason of this difference is geographical-cultural: in fact country isn't known or popular in Europe at all ( almost the same -hip-hop). So , the function of urban/rural music in Europe was filled by punk ( in it's time).
Posted By: Hercules
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 16:35
I can cope with some thrash metal and some pop - just.
But I hate all the rest. Nuke 'em all!!
------------- A TVR is not a car. It's a way of life.
Posted By: Anthony
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 17:24
Prog rock is inventive music. Hip Hop is stealing a song and completely ruining it Therefore it's the worst antipole of prog rock.
Why is hip hop not a crime? When I go to a museum and throw some acid at a painting of, let's say, Picasso, I'll be locked up in jail for destroying a work of art. Hip hop is doing the same thing, but they're doing it with sound instead of something visual. But still the deed is the same, they're destroying works of art.
------------- Future prosperity lies in the way you heal the world with love
(Introitus - The hand that feeds you)
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 17:30
Hip Hop ? No, way off, good HipHop can be excellent and quite progressive..no I'd say Reggae from this poll.
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 17:42
Anthony wrote:
Why is hip hop not a crime? When I go to a museum and throw some acid at a painting of, let's say, Picasso, I'll be locked up in jail for destroying a work of art. Hip hop is doing the same thing, but they're doing it with sound instead of something visual.
If hip hop destroying a work of art, isn't it more like throwing acid on a copy of the art? The original art is fine...
"What we know we don't believe, what we don't know, we believe. It's like that, it's like that, it's like that, it's like that. Don't worry, don't worry, don't worry, don't worry, it's fine it's fine it's fine it's fine it's fine it's fine, don't worry (hey, my friend), it's fine it's fine it's fine it's fine it's fine it's fine." Skeleton Crew lyric quote more or less. "I'm never going to be satisfied until I have flown a motorcycle over 150 cars."
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Posted By: splyu
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 17:45
Regressive Wood.
Posted By: JD
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 19:14
Have to say Punk. Even though I enjoy the genre. It is the antithesis of prog on most levels. Simple song structures as compared to the complexity of prog. Complete lack of concern for any vocal timbre. No need to have taken any real music lessons, and a pretty cheap stage show (usually two Canadian Tire flood lights and an ash tray on an amp). Yup, Punk is everything that Prog is not. And I love it, from the Vibrators to Green Day, they all have a place in my collection.
------------- Thank you for supporting independently produced music
Posted By: Soul Dreamer
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 20:33
Punk isn't the antithesis of prog. Punk may have started as a counter-movement, but more against the disco sound than against prog. Bands like the Stranglers quickly evolved into something very comparable to prog, while the punk movement soon gave way to "new wave" which is very prog-related.... Nowadays IMO the antithesis of prog is rap/hip-hop... (I don't think it was in the '80)... Rap/hip-hop has become the lowest demenour of commercial "music" (I wouldn't even call it music, especially if it hits the charts...)
------------- To be the one who seeks so I may find .. (Metallica)
Posted By: Stooge
Date Posted: November 20 2009 at 20:52
Elevator/waiting room music.
Posted By: tszirmay
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 00:14
Well back in1977 , it was definitely punk, an outright media-fueled reaction to ELP, Yes, Tull and company and we know the rest (yet the Stranglers, Ultravox and Magazine among many others combined both genres). Today, I would say country. A progger living in Alberta, you know that I know how lonely I feel musically speaking! Can't stand that Stetson drivel....
------------- I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.
Posted By: progrules
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 02:45
Soul Dreamer wrote:
Punk isn't the antithesis of prog. Punk may have started as a counter-movement, but more against the disco sound than against prog. Bands like the Stranglers quickly evolved into something very comparable to prog, while the punk movement soon gave way to "new wave" which is very prog-related.... Nowadays IMO the antithesis of prog is rap/hip-hop... (I don't think it was in the '80)... Rap/hip-hop has become the lowest demenour of commercial "music" (I wouldn't even call it music, especially if it hits the charts...)
This would just about have been my answer, completely agree. Is this coincidence ?
What country were you from, Jan ?
------------- A day without prog is a wasted day
Posted By: progrules
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 02:49
Blacksword wrote:
The closest I can think of, is the rap in 'Roll the bones' by Rush
The one that comes to mind for me is Spitfall by Pain of Salvation. Excellent rap that is by the way
------------- A day without prog is a wasted day
Posted By: Toaster Mantis
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 02:58
I would vote for folk music because it's all about being old-fashioned and traditionalistic whereas progressive rock's about, well, progress... if it wasn't for Jethro Tull.
Would pretty much agree with whomever said that it's kinda difficult for another genre to be prog rock's "foe" because the entire idea of prog rock is to combine rock'n'roll with other genres. That said, I've encountered much more reggae-bashing here than on any other forum I've ever visited.
------------- "The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 07:30
Toaster Mantis wrote:
I would vote for folk music because it's all about being old-fashioned and traditionalistic whereas progressive rock's about, well, progress... if it wasn't for Jethro Tull.
Would pretty much agree with whomever said that it's kinda difficult for another genre to be prog rock's "foe" because the entire idea of prog rock is to combine rock'n'roll with other genres. That said, I've encountered much more reggae-bashing here than on any other forum I've ever visited.
I would have said reggaeton-bashing rather than reggae-bashing since many prog fans are reasonably tolerant of "real" reggae such as roots-reggae and dub-reggae (and some even like ska-reggae), yet merely mentioning reggaeton is guaranteed to raise the hackles of many of our South American members
And Island was intially a reggae label (and Harvest was a Progressive Blues/Folk/Folk Rock label)
------------- What?
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 07:37
I love reggae and used to work professionally with Jamaican musicians in California. Once you work with the source you hear the richness of the music, rather than the more superficial 'new wave' stateside version of reggae.
Once upon a time in the states long long ago, the same Gem catalouge carried nothing but hard to find prog-rock and the new reggae sound, unlikely brothers in the states from the word go.
I used to work with a North African artist who combined Pink Floyd styled space rock with reggae, very nice stuff, and allowed for mixing Richard Wright type electric piano styles with Prince Jammy psychedelic B3 dub styles, not worlds apart at all.
To me, Floyd's Meddle, Miles' Agharta and Prince Jammy are all coming from the same place, it's all about stopping time so we can move horizontally rather than always rushing ahead vertically, Bill Laswell and Brian Eno saw that early on and have built their respective careers on that idea.
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 07:44
Yeah, I recently discovered reggae is something different than I expected. I bought a Horace Andy compilation from the discount box and it's amazing, especially the early 70s stuff. It doesn't even resemble Bob Marley (which I can't stand any more). I only bought it because he's a Massive Attack alumnus and boy, what a surprise!
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 07:47
Tis a pity that 'Prog itself' is not an available option for the poll, as that's what I would vote. I can't imagine fans of punk, metal and reggae have the sorts of internecine bickering that we do on PA ?
-------------
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 07:53
ExittheLemming wrote:
Tis a pity that 'Prog itself' is not an available option for the poll, as that's what I would vote. I can't imagine fans of punk, metal and reggae have the sorts of internecine bickering that we do on PA ?
That reminds me, I was visiting a soul music site the other day and people were still arguing vehemently about the addition of Elvis even though he had been added about a year earlier, sound familiar
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 07:57
harmonium.ro wrote:
Yeah, I recently discovered reggae is something different than I expected. I bought a Horace Andy compilation from the discount box and it's amazing, especially the early 70s stuff. It doesn't even resemble Bob Marley (which I can't stand any more). I only bought it because he's a Massive Attack alumnus and boy, what a surprise!
I'd take Horace Andy over Marley any day, it's almost sacrilege to say anything negative about Marley to some of the musical types I run with, but I find much of his music to be boring, although there are a couple that really move, and his percussionists and guitarists are incredible.
By the way, did you know prog-rock session kybdst Rabbit played on a couple classic Marley albums, that's his clavinet melodies you are hearing.
Posted By: clarke2001
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 08:46
There is no genre that is a 'foe' to prog, because prog can embrace anything into itself.
I voted for other. If prog got any foes, it's prog itself.
Posted By: JD
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 09:08
Soul Dreamer wrote:
Punk isn't the antithesis of prog. Punk may have started as a counter-movement, but more against the disco sound than against prog. Bands like the Stranglers quickly evolved into something very comparable to prog, while the punk movement soon gave way to "new wave" which is very prog-related.... Nowadays IMO the antithesis of prog is rap/hip-hop... (I don't think it was in the '80)... Rap/hip-hop has become the lowest demenour of commercial "music" (I wouldn't even call it music, especially if it hits the charts...)
How do you consider the Stranglers Punk?? Clearly they were at the forefront of what was to become the Electro-Pop movement. Just because they were on the music scene during the Punk movement doesn't mean they are a Punk band. Or is this one of those cases where Punk and Prog actually intersect in so much as each has a zillion sub-genres? I always put bands like the Sex Pistols, The Clash, Iggy and the Stooges and the Ramones as Punk. Bands like The Strangles, OMD, New Order, Our Daugther's Wedding or Depeche Mode are at the far edge of Punk IMHO.
------------- Thank you for supporting independently produced music
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 11:02
clarke2001 wrote:
Dean wrote:
Moris dancing,
Surely you meant http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5FIoocja4k - Boris dancing , didn't you?
always fun to see that again.
when I was typing that list I did wonder of you would spot the reference - what we need is a youtube clip of you dancing
------------- What?
Posted By: Toaster Mantis
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 13:21
ExittheLemming wrote:
Tis a pity that 'Prog itself' is not an available option for the poll, as that's what I would vote. I can't imagine fans of punk, metal and reggae have the sorts of internecine bickering that we do on PA ?
Punk and metal probably have much more of it since I don't remember progressive rock having anywhere as much in the way of "scene politics".
------------- "The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Posted By: Toaster Mantis
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 13:25
Dean wrote:
I would have said reggaeton-bashing rather than reggae-bashing since many prog fans are reasonably tolerant of "real" reggae such as roots-reggae and dub-reggae (and some even like ska-reggae), yet merely mentioning reggaeton is guaranteed to raise the hackles of many of our South American members
And Island was intially a reggae label (and Harvest was a Progressive Blues/Folk/Folk Rock label)
Yeah, I knew that there's a lot of different reggae genres but I've seen a bit of bashing reggae just based on the more popular styles as well as a tendency to talk about dub as a separate genre from reggae. It looks like it's a similar thing with hip-hop.
------------- "The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 13:45
Easy Money wrote:
That reminds me, I was visiting a soul music site the other day and people were still arguing vehemently about the addition of Elvis even though he had been added about a year earlier, sound familiar
now that's funny
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 18:34
Toaster Mantis wrote:
ExittheLemming wrote:
Tis a pity that 'Prog itself' is not an available option for the poll, as that's what I would vote. I can't imagine fans of punk, metal and reggae have the sorts of internecine bickering that we do on PA ?
Punk and metal probably have much more of it since I don't remember progressive rock having anywhere as much in the way of "scene politics".
As I don't frequent Metal or Punk sites, you may be correct but ain't this principally because Prog does not have an easily identifiable uniform, look or attitude to conform to ?
-------------
Posted By: UndercoverBoy
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 19:17
Punk would be the obvious choice, because Prog and Punk are, at their core, almost complete opposites. Punk is meant to be short and simple, while Prog is meant to be long and complex. That being said, I think the lines between Prog and Punk have been blurred a little. For example, Captain Beefheart is on ProgArchives, and many Punk Bands cite him as an influence. His songs are very short, but also innovative, so I think the two genres can merge from time to time. You could also say the same for David Bowie.
Posted By: Soul Dreamer
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 21:42
JD wrote:
Soul Dreamer wrote:
Punk isn't the antithesis of prog. Punk may have started as a counter-movement, but more against the disco sound than against prog. Bands like the Stranglers quickly evolved into something very comparable to prog, while the punk movement soon gave way to "new wave" which is very prog-related.... Nowadays IMO the antithesis of prog is rap/hip-hop... (I don't think it was in the '80)... Rap/hip-hop has become the lowest demenour of commercial "music" (I wouldn't even call it music, especially if it hits the charts...)
How do you consider the Stranglers Punk?? Clearly they were at the forefront of what was to become the Electro-Pop movement. Just because they were on the music scene during the Punk movement doesn't mean they are a Punk band. Or is this one of those cases where Punk and Prog actually intersect in so much as each has a zillion sub-genres? I always put bands like the Sex Pistols, The Clash, Iggy and the Stooges and the Ramones as Punk. Bands like The Strangles, OMD, New Order, Our Daugther's Wedding or Depeche Mode are at the far edge of Punk IMHO.
Rattus Norvegicus and No More Heroes were "real" punk albums by The Stranglers, after that they moved on....
------------- To be the one who seeks so I may find .. (Metallica)
Posted By: Soul Dreamer
Date Posted: November 21 2009 at 21:59
progrules wrote:
Soul Dreamer wrote:
Punk isn't the antithesis of prog. Punk may have started as a counter-movement, but more against the disco sound than against prog. Bands like the Stranglers quickly evolved into something very comparable to prog, while the punk movement soon gave way to "new wave" which is very prog-related.... Nowadays IMO the antithesis of prog is rap/hip-hop... (I don't think it was in the '80)... Rap/hip-hop has become the lowest demenour of commercial "music" (I wouldn't even call it music, especially if it hits the charts...)
This would just about have been my answer, completely agree. Is this coincidence ?
What country were you from, Jan ?
hahaha
maybe we just have a lot in common in taste of music....
------------- To be the one who seeks so I may find .. (Metallica)
Posted By: Toaster Mantis
Date Posted: November 22 2009 at 02:57
ExittheLemming wrote:
Toaster Mantis wrote:
Punk and metal probably have much more of it since I don't remember progressive rock having anywhere as much in the way of "scene politics".
As I don't frequent Metal or Punk sites, you may be correct but ain't this principally because Prog does not have an easily identifiable uniform, look or attitude to conform to ?
Yeah, progressive rock just has "scenes", metal and punk have well-defined subcultural identities associated with those scenes, but in both cases the scenes still come before the fashion and attitude of which they're an outgrowth. I've also noticed that progressive rock fans welcome mainstream acceptance whereas in metal, punk and probably also goth rock circles there's a tendency to see mainstream crossover success as pearls before swine.
------------- "The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Posted By: JD
Date Posted: November 22 2009 at 07:31
Soul Dreamer wrote:
JD wrote:
Soul Dreamer wrote:
Bands like the Stranglers quickly evolved into something very comparable to prog, while the punk movement soon gave way to "new wave" which is very prog-related....
How do you consider the Stranglers Punk?? Clearly they were at the forefront of what was to become the Electro-Pop movement. Just because they were on the music scene during the Punk movement doesn't mean they are a Punk band. Or is this one of those cases where Punk and Prog actually intersect in so much as each has a zillion sub-genres? I always put bands like the Sex Pistols, The Clash, Iggy and the Stooges and the Ramones as Punk. Bands like The Strangles, OMD, New Order, Our Daugther's Wedding or Depeche Mode are at the far edge of Punk IMHO.
Rattus Norvegicus and No More Heroes were "real" punk albums by The Stranglers, after that they moved on....
Admittedly I'm not familiar with all the Stranglers recordings. I base my opinion on "Gospel According to MIB", Feline and Norfolk Coast, which I have. I was aggressively a prog snob in the eighties. In my early 20's and only wanting to fill my head with "challenging" music. I was more likely to listen to Frank Zappa or Harry Partch than any "80's" bands. Only in the last 15 years have I been going back and filling in the blanks trying to give most of what i previously ignored at least one listen. I'll happily concede the point.
------------- Thank you for supporting independently produced music
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: November 22 2009 at 07:56
Toaster Mantis wrote:
ExittheLemming wrote:
Toaster Mantis wrote:
Punk and metal probably have much more of it since I don't remember progressive rock having anywhere as much in the way of "scene politics".
As I don't frequent Metal or Punk sites, you may be correct but ain't this principally because Prog does not have an easily identifiable uniform, look or attitude to conform to ?
Yeah, progressive rock just has "scenes", metal and punk have well-defined subcultural identities associated with those scenes, but in both cases the scenes still come before the fashion and attitude of which they're an outgrowth. I've also noticed that progressive rock fans welcome mainstream acceptance whereas in metal, punk and probably also goth rock circles there's a tendency to see mainstream crossover success as pearls before swine.
Interesting summary certainly. I don't think you really believe that mainstream success for either a punk or prog band would be viewed by either 'scene' as pearls before swine. Even a casual glance through the Collins Genesis, Asia or Buggles Yes threads over the years would be sufficient to convince anyone that what flows unopposed into the mainstream is viewed with contempt by the hard-liners as a very diluted or polluted version of the genre ? (I'm not defending the anti-populist brigade here BTW) Do you really mean those bands that don't pander to being radio-friendly but are still mainstream successful ? (erm...I can't think of any proggers that fit the bill, apart from say Floyd ?)
-------------
Posted By: synthguy
Date Posted: November 22 2009 at 10:23
manofmystery wrote:
prog has been it's own worst enemy since the end of the 70s
------------- Wearing feelings on our faces when our faces took a rest...
Posted By: Toaster Mantis
Date Posted: November 22 2009 at 11:11
ExittheLemming wrote:
I don't think you really believe that mainstream success for either a punk or prog band would be viewed by either 'scene' as pearls before swine. Even a casual glance through the Collins Genesis, Asia or Buggles Yes threads over the years would be sufficient to convince anyone that what flows unopposed into the mainstream is viewed with contempt by the hard-liners as a very diluted or polluted version of the genre ? (I'm not defending the anti-populist brigade here BTW)
Do you really mean those bands that don't pander to being radio-friendly but are still mainstream successful ?
Not for progressive rock at least, however in metal there's quite a bit of distrust towards not only bands that deliberately go for mainstream crossover success but towards when more "authentic" bands get popular outside the metal subculture. The antipathy isn't towards the artists but fans in question who don't have enough loyalty/familiarity with the subculture and are hence perceived at not appreciating metal for the right reasons. http://www.metal-archives.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=55521 - This thread on a metal forum would be a very good example of what I'm talking about.
I am very certain there's similar concerns in the punk subculture even though I don't have first-hand experience of it like I have with metal. As for my opinion, on one hand I can definitely understand where such concerns are coming from but on the other hand I also get the impression that even within subcultures it's usually very few of their actual members who actually live up to whatever high-falutin' ideals the movements in question have. It's pretty much an universal constant, has always been so and applies to all of 'em from Goths to neo-beatniks. Alternately depressing or hilarious that it's still so 41 years after Frank Zappa commenced castigating the hippies for his...
(hell, it goes beyond subcultures to much looser-defined "fan communities", see a certain Prog Blog of mine)
------------- "The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 22 2009 at 12:23
Toaster Mantis wrote:
ExittheLemming wrote:
I don't think you really believe that mainstream success for either a punk or prog band would be viewed by either 'scene' as pearls before swine. Even a casual glance through the Collins Genesis, Asia or Buggles Yes threads over the years would be sufficient to convince anyone that what flows unopposed into the mainstream is viewed with contempt by the hard-liners as a very diluted or polluted version of the genre ? (I'm not defending the anti-populist brigade here BTW)[
Do you really mean those bands that don't pander to being radio-friendly but are still mainstream successful
Not for progressive rock at least, however in metal there's quite a bit of distrust towards not only bands that deliberately go for mainstream crossover success but towards when more "authentic" bands get popular outside the metal subculture. The antipathy isn't towards the artists but fans in question who don't have enough loyalty/familiarity with the subculture and are hence perceived at not appreciating metal for the right reasons. http://www.metal-archives.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=55521 - This thread on a metal forum would be a very good example of what I'm talking about.
I am very certain there's similar concerns in the punk subculture even though I don't have first-hand experience of it like I have with metal. As for my opinion, on one hand I can definitely understand where such concerns are coming from but on the other hand I also get the impression that even within subcultures it's usually very few of their actual members who actually live up to whatever high-falutin' ideals the movements in question have. It's pretty much an universal constant, has always been so and applies to all of 'em from Goths to neo-beatniks. Alternately depressing or hilarious that it's still so 41 years after Frank Zappa commenced castigating the hippies for his...
(hell, it goes beyond subcultures to much looser-defined "fan communities", see a certain Prog Blog of mine)
I think your "pearls before swine" comment has led to some misunderstanding of what you meant - usually the derision of the tru-fan is towards the artist for "dumbing-down" (selling-out) rather than for them putting their "high-quality" product before an audience that does not appreciate it. Your comment about the metal fans being derisive of casual fans of one band rather than of the genre as a whole is true for most genres - as the "Monsters" poll has demonstrated.
From the goth subculture there is a degree of pride involved when one of their faithful gains some popular appeal - Goth itself came out of a popular genres of music (New Romantic & Post Punk) and at it's peak had a measure mainstream success - most modern Goth bands pine for those halcyon days. Any subculture suspicion is reserved for outsiders who attempt popularity by hijacking the genre, eg Marylin Manson or by people attracted to the image but not the music - but even they are eventually accepted by the subculture.
------------- What?
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: November 22 2009 at 13:02
This is an interesting conversation, I was thinking of various subcultures I was familiar with over the years and bands that recieved scorn from those subcultures:
late 80s California hardcore - Green Day
mid-70s funk - KC and the Sunshine Band
late 80s hip-hop - Vanilla Ice, MC Hammer
mid 70s prog - Kansas, ELO. Rush, Alan Parsons, even Pink Floyd for some
mid 90s electronic - Moby
early 80s west coast punk - X (first west coast punk band to sign to a major label, a major sin)
60s folk - Dylan
late 60s jazz - Miles
late 60s blues/rock - Led Zep, Grand Funk Railroad
Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 09:14
This was, I think, an interesting topic which I saw being looked at in the Active Users list (I like that list for seeing old topics I had forgotten about or never seen). I still think that Prog is commonly the hybridization of genres and so due to its incorporative qualities other enemies are not the enemy to Prog, but instead like with the Borg, to be assimilated (which if drawing out that analogy would make a Prog an enemy to the genres, but I don’t think the genres care). I also think that Prog as a genre can be the enemy of progressive rock, as once we accept Prog as a genre we can start imposing limits on it which limits how far rock can progress from canonical expectations and thereby Prog may not be a truly progressive genre in the sense of always changing, moving forward, adapting and being an open world. Gorp, which is my term for backwards Prog (regressive rock) could also be seen as the enemy if it were an accepted genre. Retro Rock is a common label, but actually I think you can be both retro and progressive. I think one can look to and borrow from the past while also moving towards the future, and in fact I think that is important. Prog to my mind tends to be more innovative than originative.
------------- https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts
Posted By: Grumpyprogfan
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 09:43
Never thought music was a competition. There is no foe in any musical genre.
Never knew tear-jerkers was a musical genre.
Posted By: Psychedelic Paul
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 09:46
I chose Punk even before I saw the options. Punk Rock lasted all of two years but Prog Rock lives on forever.
Posted By: Grumpyprogfan
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 09:51
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
I chose Punk even before I saw the options. Punk Rock lasted all of two years but Prog Rock lives on forever.
Punk lasted more than two years and still lives on. Ever heard of Green Day?
Posted By: Psychedelic Paul
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 10:51
Grumpyprogfan wrote:
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
I chose Punk even before I saw the options. Punk Rock lasted all of two years but Prog Rock lives on forever.
Punk lasted more than two years and still lives on. Ever heard of Green Day?
Punk Rock only lasted about two years in England before it fizzled out like a damp squib. Never mind the *******, Johnny Rotten of the Sex Pistols is now reduced to selling Country Life butter to scrape a living.
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 11:46
------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword
Posted By: someone_else
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 15:07
Grumpyprogfan wrote:
Never thought music was a competition. There is no foe in any musical genre.
Never knew tear-jerkers was a musical genre.
It is, at least in the Netherlands, where the OP comes from. We knew it as smartlap, named after a sheet with the lyrics that was displayed to give the audience a chance to sing a long. Nowadays the term levenslied (song of life) is more often used, referencing to simple songs that appeal to primitive feelings, held in esteem mostly by people with a lower intellectual level. It is not hard to understand why this genre was added to the list.
-------------
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 15:51
-------------
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Posted By: JD
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 16:53
^Perfect.
I was listening to Goody Two Shoes today.
------------- Thank you for supporting independently produced music
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 17:30
EDM?
------------- “On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.” — Ernest Vong
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 17:30
^ ha! i listened to that after this one. Adam Ant or & The Ants had a very unique sound. Love that horn section!
-------------
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Posted By: Heart of the Matter
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 18:56
Rap. It's more personal dislike than anything what makes me vote this way, I confess. And proggers can be also prone to tears every once in a while.
Posted By: Hugh Manatee
Date Posted: March 17 2022 at 19:28
[W]hen the Sex Pistols members Johnny Rotten, Paul Cook and Steve Jones at some point all shared on stage in a Pink Floyd T-shirt with the words ”I HATE” on top he immediately turned Pink Floyd to a love-to-hate example among not only the working class sub cultures like Punk but also among many ”established” intellectuals and music critics.
Suddenly it became haute couture to like Punk and to dislike sophisticated and talented, really talented, bands in general and Pink Floyd in particular. As critic Stuart Berman had written; ”Pink Floyd represented everything Punk was not: musically skilled, conceptually ambitious, filthy rich, tastefully bearded.”
From: https://vintagenewsdaily.com/when-the-sex-pistols-members-shared-their-famous-t-shirt-reading-i-hate-pink-floyd-in-the-1970s/?msclkid=e2087f33a65911ec9fb6aad2967fad83" rel="nofollow - When the Sex Pistols Members Shared Their Famous T-shirt Reading “I HATE PINK FLOYD” in the 1970s | Vintage News Daily
------------- I should have been a pair of ragged claws Scuttling across the floors of uncertain seas
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: March 19 2022 at 07:36
certainly not Punk, not today, and Punk are different styles with some close to Progressive Rock
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: nick_h_nz
Date Posted: March 19 2022 at 07:44
Yeah, punk was never prog's foe - not even in the '70s. That was a complete media fabrication, that didn't really match the reality at all. It made a good story, though.
There are definite cross-overs between punk and prog, and have been from the off-set. And there was certainly a mutual respect and admiration between many punk and prog musicians in the '70s. (Not all, obviously, and it was the detractors the media pounced upon. It's easy, for example, to make fun of Yes.)
As punk became post-punk, it became even more prog than some of it already had been. And while punk exists still, it tends to be vastly different from punk then - simply because, especially in the UK, punk was as much a culture as it was a genre. A lot of early American punk was actually pretty much the equivalent of prog music of the US (as discussed in the American prog thread).
I don't think it's really possible for any genre to be a foe to prog, simply because prog isn't a genre in itself, and can exist within any genre. I am quite sure one could find examples of prog in every "genre" given in the poll.
I think the biggest foe to prog is probably actually prog itself - it is its own worst enemy. Or, at least, the gatekeeping and infighting of its fans are its enemy. Potentially, some might say that the rise of retro-prog is the foe of prog. I don't think that's necessarily so, as there can still be some really innovative and original sounds made under that label - but certainly a lot of retro-prog does nothing to help the image of prog in the eyes of those who don't know much about it.
------------- https://tinyurl.com/nickhnz-tpa" rel="nofollow - Reviewer for The Progressive Aspect
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: March 21 2022 at 03:08
Blues is obvious, as mainstream Rock is Blues-based while Progressive Rock is progression of mainstream.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Guldbamsen
Date Posted: March 21 2022 at 03:24
‘What genre is the antipole of prog?’ Probably schlager.
The punk and disco options are ridiculous imho and only really make sense to peeps that believe ‘the press’ is informed and furthermore leaks said info along to us without colouring it in a certain way. The Sex Pistols, whilst not exactly the biggest Floyd fans, were very much into Van Der Graaf Generator and a whole host of other prog bands
Edith: here in Denmark though Schlager is called Dansktop…but it’s the same stuff.
------------- “The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: March 21 2022 at 09:40
Guldbamsen wrote:
‘ Edith: here in Denmark though Schlager is called Dansktop…but it’s the same stuff.
So, you're from Denmark, too, Guldbamsen: hej!, and I've been curious about your moniker, and have been thinking about to ask of it.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Guldbamsen
Date Posted: March 22 2022 at 10:26
Yup about as Danish as they come! I pass the rød grød med fløde test with flying colours
------------- “The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams
Posted By: tigerfeet
Date Posted: March 22 2022 at 10:49
I agree with a couple of posters here that prog can be prog's worst enemy rather than another genre since prog often uses or combines other genres in some way. so yes, prog can be progs worst foe.
------------- I'm sorry, if you were right, I'd agree with you. Robin Williams.