Print Page | Close Window

A Scaling Idea

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Help us improve the site
Forum Description: Help us improve the forums, and the site as a whole
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=61424
Printed Date: November 27 2024 at 00:58
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: A Scaling Idea
Posted By: Negoba
Subject: A Scaling Idea
Date Posted: September 21 2009 at 15:10
To put in perspective how rare 1's and 5's should be I like to think of the 5 points as being a 0-10 scale
 
 
1          2          3          4          5
 
0         2.5        5         7.5       10
 
 
This puts the separations at:
 
1 = 0-1.25
2 = 1.26-3.75
3 = 3.76-6.25
4 = 6.26-8.75
5 = 8.76-10
 
I see that I probably need some of my 5 star albums to the 4 star category.


-------------
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.



Replies:
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: September 21 2009 at 15:14
Says nothing about how scarce your ratings should be. 

Why are people convinced you should only have a certain amount of 5 star ratings.


-------------
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "


Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: September 21 2009 at 15:20
There is definitely a tendency to want to review your favorites, and not spend time to really listen to music you don't like. (Both of which skews your list up) But an 8.5/10 album really probably does belong as a 4 star, and I'm not sure all of my ratings reflect that.
 
I'm not changing anything for awhile though, I'd rather do new reviews...Big smile


-------------
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.


Posted By: SaltyJon
Date Posted: September 21 2009 at 16:01
It's an interesting concept though.  When I write my (very) few reviews I'll try to remember to use it.  I'm feeling a review coming up in the next few weeks so I'll test it out then. Why make it the scale you have instead of, say, 0-2, 2.01-4, 4.01-6, 6.01-8 and 8.01-10 though?  

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Salty_Jon" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: September 21 2009 at 16:03
The point is that equal scaling makes in this way makes 1's and 5's harder to get than 2,3,4 which is the express intent of the site.

-------------
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.


Posted By: SaltyJon
Date Posted: September 21 2009 at 16:11
Oh, so it's purposefully giving 1 star and 5 star only 1.25 possible points instead of the 2.5 that 2-4 get, I see.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Salty_Jon" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Stooge
Date Posted: September 21 2009 at 16:26
I don't see how that scale applies to the 3 star rating, which is supposed to be used for "good" albums.  When I see a scale that is out of 10, I would not think that an album is good if it has a rating of 4/10.  It doesn't fit the description, or at least how I interpret it.

I guess my scaling system would be something closer to this:
1 stars-0 to 1.99
2 stars- 2 to 4.99
3 stars- 5 to 7.99
4 stars-8 to 8.99
5 stars- 9 to 10

Not as balanced as yours, but it roughly fits my existing ratings of albums.  It's actually quite unbalanced actually. LOL

Everyone will interpret the star ratings differently, which is why I just let the accompanying star descriptions guide my grading.

Just my 2 cents. Smile


Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: September 22 2009 at 14:14

Your scale is probably where alot people rate from their gut. I was trying to do something a little more analytical, which is certainly not necessarily better.



-------------
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.


Posted By: Marty McFly
Date Posted: September 23 2009 at 04:31
Everyone rates differently, your scale seems nice.

-------------
There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless,"

   -Andyman1125 on Lulu







Even my



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk