Western civilization: Important societies
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics not related to music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=58064
Printed Date: February 04 2025 at 02:41 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Western civilization: Important societies
Posted By: crimson87
Subject: Western civilization: Important societies
Date Posted: May 18 2009 at 22:17
And by important I mean whose achievements and legacy have been KEY components of the western civilization.
I think it's Italy. The romans embraced Ancient Greece's legacy and spread it all over his Empire. Plus they were masters of goverment ( for the time) and codified laws that still up to this day are taught in universities. Then you have in the pre Renaissence period , they developed modern cities and established modern trade routes , as well as finance sistems. Documents like letters of trade were developed in Firenze and Venice. They almost gave the kickoff to capitalism. First medical university was italian ( Salerno). Then you have the Renaissence period which was started in Italy and then spread all over Europe.
On top of that , columbus was italian
|
Replies:
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: May 18 2009 at 22:20
USA! USA! USA!
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: May 18 2009 at 22:28
I don't know , the US embraced all this cultures and are impotant since the beggining of the XX century. They took everything to a bigger scale that's for sure. Major culture providers in the moment that cant be argued for good or bad.
|
Posted By: WalterDigsTunes
Date Posted: May 18 2009 at 22:28
Erm... Italy, France and England are all, to differing extents, pieces of the Roman Empire. Some were peripheral, others were central. The development of modern nation states in these zones is fairly recent (mere centuries), and if we rewind 1,500 years, the British isles consists of a slew of warring tribes, France consists of Franks and other tribes and Italy just barely saw the end of the Roman Empire at the hands of the Goths. Ultimately, I think you should've broken this up into two questions: which ancient civilization did more, and which modern one do you see as most important.
|
Posted By: KoS
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 01:45
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 03:32
Greece, if only because they got 90% of civilized society right, and then we spent the next 2000 years f**king it up and rebuilding it.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: RoyFairbank
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 09:32
If by Italy you mean Rome too, then its an obvious choice. Rome and its memory has always conditioned life and culture in Europe.
|
Posted By: akamaisondufromage
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 12:54
England of course hahaha. I can here my neighbours (Scots, Welsh etc) just seething with rage over this question! Ha ha! Anyway the Brits invented : Prog, Football (The original not what the Americans laughingly call football) (The one EVERYBODY else plays), the sandwich, TV, etc Oh and Cricket ha ha. What did the Romans do for us?
------------- Help me I'm falling!
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 13:12
akamaisondufromage wrote:
England of course hahaha. I can here my neighbours (Scots, Welsh etc) just seething with rage over this question! Ha ha! Anyway the Brits invented : Prog, Football (The original not what the Americans laughingly call football) (The one EVERYBODY else plays), the sandwich, TV, etc Oh and Cricket ha ha. What did the Romans do for us? |
But have you seen their teeth?
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: akamaisondufromage
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 13:42
Teeth? Yes I know we have dodgy teeth, agreed. Thats cos we've got more important things to think about than what our smiles look like. I notice the questioner didn't even concider the USA in his list.
The roads. Oh yes the roads.
------------- Help me I'm falling!
|
Posted By: aapatsos
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 13:52
I voted fro Greece beacause I am Greek - I did not bother to think (this is a completely unbiased response )
|
Posted By: horsewithteeth11
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 16:25
I'd put Greece and Rome on pretty even footing. But Greece did a lot of things first whereas the Romans copied them and improved on their ideas. So Greece it is.
-------------
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 16:39
That's such a hard question. I'll give it to England for the invention of the black pudding.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 17:38
I like all,
Greeks gave us epic poetry, philosophy, history, music theory, the democratic system and they had great artists.
The Romans also had artists just as good, but they had better architects: they invented mortar, the arch, the vault, the dome. They projected and implemented vital stuff like the aquaducts, viaducts, stadiums. They had a great knowledge on how to run a state (but had a lot of terrible emperors) and they left us with Roman Law. Also their language stands at the foundation of a lot of modern languages.
The French shown a lot of style, and later even had some great artists. The women in Paris and France in general are the most beautiful I've ever seen.
The English had Rock, Prog and English Humour, so they win.
|
Posted By: Atkingani
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 19:39
Someone said: "in the end of the day, we are all Greeks!".
------------- Guigo
~~~~~~
|
Posted By: LiquidEternity
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 20:28
Romans kicked butt, man. As a semi-linguist, it's fun to see how just how powerful of a language Latin was and has been to this day. Cool stuff. It's kind of a toss up in general, though, between Rome and Greece. Greece was first and Rome built off a lot of it. It's hard to say.
-------------
|
Posted By: rpe9p
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 20:37
I think this thread needs to turn into a debate about health care in the US. I think the US was excluded from this poll because it does not have universal health care and is therefore not an important society.
|
Posted By: RoyFairbank
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 21:39
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
I'd put Greece and Rome on pretty even footing. But Greece did a lot of things first whereas the Romans copied them and improved on their ideas. So Greece it is. |
This is a very typical approach to history. Greece was to Rome what Rome is to us today (and there are more of us). But that's just a superficial approach.
Greece was a Polis culture, i.e. vast wilderness doted with a few tiny slave labor and peasant requisition supported cities who formed no whole country or nation. It had limited grasp and nothing compared to the Macedonian Empire or later Roman Empire. While the Greek economy was the most advanced of the time other major civilizations competed with Greece: the Egyptians and Persians for example. The Persians are major Eastern civilization and it was the Persians who almost conquered Greece, not the other way round.
Almost everything with Greece is overemphasised. Even compared to other epochs the ruling class has been bloated in historical consciousness to the point of obscuring how it teetered on a primitive and volatile base. Athens is overemphaized. A single dot on the dark, dark map, its "democratic" council of lord slave/landowners was a product of its secure economic position. Otherwise Greece was ruled by Oligarchy and Tyrants, with only a brief "golden age." Greece was a virtual annex of Macedonia and Rome for the following millenia.
Rome built a centralized world empire of millions of people, excelled to a point infinitely beyond the Greeks in all aspects of technology and culture, build vast townships, cities, incorporated thousands of distinict nationalities, brought every great empire down to its knees and incorporated them. It build roads that crisscrosed the world, great ships and endless documentation and education. It converted 30% of the known world's population into slaves to propel its economy. It established an economy that reached the far reaches of Asia and was integrated with Rome. Rome and Constantiople were like New York if you take Athens as a small town. Compared to the running strip at Olympus They had sports arenas that sat hundreds of thousands: like the Coliseum and the HIppodrome at Constantinople.
For a thousand years after the fall of Rome the Byzantine Empire remained the most powerful and richest country in Europe - until the 1500s. The Holy Roman Empire, the biggest nation in Europe proper (germany and surronding areas) continued the traditions of Rome and operated with its name. This was the most powerful nation in Europe proper until the 1700s. Charlemange made himself the Roman Emperor, Rome continued as the base of the Vatican and the whole of western Christianity. Papal authority commanded all Kings. From Constantinople the Eastern Orthodox religion was run.
The Crusades came from both of their authorities.
I could go on.
|
Posted By: WalterDigsTunes
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 22:08
rpe9p wrote:
I think this thread needs to turn into a debate about health care in the US. I think the US was excluded from this poll because it does not have universal health care and is therefore not an important society.
|
Erm, Ancient Greece and the Roman Empire didn't have it either. Should they have been excluded too?
|
Posted By: KoS
Date Posted: May 19 2009 at 23:16
rpe9p wrote:
I think this thread needs to turn into a debate about health care in the US. I think the US was excluded from this poll because it does not have universal health care and is therefore not an important society.
| wow....Internet Hero in the making.
Actually the US should be here. The Declaration of Independence and Constitution have been pretty important documents.
|
Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 04:20
Greece, simply because they invented Taramasalata and it's tasty - and a fetching shade of pink
------------- It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
|
Posted By: npjnpj
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 05:21
Greece because of it's philosophers and the development of democracy.
Greeks were the thinkers, Romans the soldiers, the French eat stuff and the English first colonised the world and then imported the whole bloody place back to England.
|
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 05:52
npjnpj wrote:
Greece because of it's philosophers and the development of democracy.
Greeks were the thinkers, Romans the soldiers, the French eat stuff and the English first colonised the world and then imported the whole bloody place back to England. |
Even if I would choose Greece, I think that saying that the Romans were just soldiers is oversimplifying things just a little bit. Someone else mentioned Roman architecture, and Latin was the first example of an international language with many regional varieties - much as English is today. Personally, I believe that saying "The French eat stuff" is a very disparaging remark about a people who have given quite a lot to modern civilization - there would have been no American Revolution or Constitution without the French Enlightenment, just to make an example.
|
Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 06:38
npjnpj wrote:
the French eat stuff and the English first colonised the world and then imported the whole bloody place back to England. |
Jeez, here's a first - a and a in the same post!!!
I'm hoping you were being ironic about the French reference - a little edit of a would have helped 'cos otherwise it could indeed be construed as offensive.
But when it comes to your line about England (and, yes, I'm English), ironic or not you've made me laugh like a drain. I've already passed the line on to a couple of friends who nearly fell off their (bar) stools with laughter. You've just about summed up our national history in one half sentence - in an ironic sense, of course
------------- It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
|
Posted By: npjnpj
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 06:48
No offence to anyone, I was trying to be facetious, honestly.
Please consider some smileys added.
As for the Romans: It was, of course, much too simplistic. Civilisation also has to thank the Roman Empire for the wondeful invention of the orgy.
|
Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 06:51
^
Then it's just a case of saying: thanks for the best laugh I've had in ages
We English are good at taking the p*ss out of ourselves, but as we're naturally lazy when someone does it for us (and in this case better than we can) we're always grateful
------------- It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
|
Posted By: npjnpj
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 07:00
I'm English myself.
|
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 07:01
The orgy? That was brilliant!
BTW, we Italians do eat stuff as well, and plenty of it!
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 07:16
Raff wrote:
The orgy? That was brilliant!
BTW, we Italians do eat stuff as well, and plenty of it!
|
Also, let's not forget the naughty artwork.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 07:19
Slartibartfast wrote:
Raff wrote:
The orgy? That was brilliant!
BTW, we Italians do eat stuff as well, and plenty of it!
|
Also, let's not forget the naughty artwork.
|
Well, the Greeks had their share too... Ever seen some of the pictures on those vases?
|
Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 07:26
Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 07:30
npjnpj wrote:
I'm English myself. |
I honestly thought you were German, that's why I thought the comment was extra funny, if you see what i mean
I'd never have doubted the irony if I'd known you were English - I rarely look up members' profiles
------------- It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
|
Posted By: npjnpj
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 07:43
Used to live quite near Norwich, by the way, in Great Yarmouth. Well, Gorleston-On-Sea, actually.
But that's a very long time ago now.
|
Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 11:55
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 12:04
Assyria, anyone?
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 12:13
Maybe too much eastern for this poll?
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 12:20
stonebeard wrote:
Assyria, anyone? |
I should have included siam and Prussia as well!
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 12:33
While we're at it, the Scots need credit for inventing one of the oddest musical instruments in the world.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Philamelian
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 12:40
I think it's superficial as Roy in the first page said. They all appeared at different times of History and you can not seperate them. Ancient Greek Civilisation seems to be the root of all modern European Civilisation maybe you can take them more important. But if they weren't in the scene of history maybe a different kind of civilisation can be developed in Europe originated from a different region. Civilisation is not something clear.
|
Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 13:05
npjnpj wrote:
Used to live quite near Norwich, by the way, in Great Yarmouth. Well, Gorleston-On-Sea, actually.
But that's a very long time ago now. |
My son goes to East Norfolk College (you've guessed it. Gorleston) and does as little there as I ever did in my UEA (UNI case you don't remember) days.
Norfolk's still a great place to be btw, and most hearty regards from what is now (for marketing purposes) called, er, Nelson's County.
The real irony of picking up on your post is that I worked as the house Journailst for BASF (UK) but was responsible to Ludwigshafen for nearly 20 years. Went there many times and I have to say the Rhineland Palatinate is literally gorgeous in rain or shine.
Bit off topic now but if you want send a pm any time you're more than welcome
------------- It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
|
Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 13:11
Slartibartfast wrote:
While we're at it, the Scots need credit for inventing one of the oddest musical instruments in the world. |
OK we know it's not the bagpipes you're referring to - so exactly what is this crazy musical instrument?*
*
------------- It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 13:14
el dingo wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
While we're at it, the Scots need credit for inventing one of the oddest musical instruments in the world. |
OK we know it's not the bagpipes you're referring to - so exactly what is this crazy musical instrument?*
* |
On a sidetrack, do you know of an odder one? The digeridoo perhaps? More in sound perhaps than in actual form.
Oh this is cool, they are both aerophones.
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 13:44
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Erm... Italy, France and England are all, to differing extents, pieces of the Roman Empire. Some were peripheral, others were central. The development of modern nation states in these zones is fairly recent (mere centuries), and if we rewind 1,500 years, the British isles consists of a slew of warring tribes, |
And once the Romans went home, that's pretty much how it reverted. The legacy of the Roman Empire in England is pretty slight - when they left art, technology, society and language went with them, any Latin in the English Language was re-imported by the French (Normans) 600 years later. It was called The Dark Ages (Early Middle Ages) because we knew so little about it (relatively) compared to what we knew of the times either side of it - the fall of Roman Empire wiped the slate clean of any direct Roman and Greek legacy. The influence of Rome and Athens on later periods and later civilizations was more of reinvention and rediscovery, much of it romanticised.
What shaped modern society was the Argricultural Revolution and the Industrial Revolution, neither of which can be artibuted to Rome or Athens - it was figures like Jethro Tull and Richard Arkwright who have had a lasting "legacy" on Western civilisation, not Plato and Julius Caesar.
------------- What?
|
Posted By: aapatsos
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 13:50
RoyFairbank wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
I'd put Greece and Rome on pretty even footing. But Greece did a lot of things first whereas the Romans copied them and improved on their ideas. So Greece it is. |
This is a very typical approach to history. Greece was to Rome what Rome is to us today (and there are more of us). But that's just a superficial approach.
Greece was a Polis culture, i.e. vast wilderness doted with a few tiny slave labor and peasant requisition supported cities who formed no whole country or nation. It had limited grasp and nothing compared to the Macedonian Empire or later Roman Empire. While the Greek economy was the most advanced of the time other major civilizations competed with Greece: the Egyptians and Persians for example. The Persians are major Eastern civilization and it was the Persians who almost conquered Greece, not the other way round.
Almost everything with Greece is overemphasised. Even compared to other epochs the ruling class has been bloated in historical consciousness to the point of obscuring how it teetered on a primitive and volatile base. Athens is overemphaized. A single dot on the dark, dark map, its "democratic" council of lord slave/landowners was a product of its secure economic position. Otherwise Greece was ruled by Oligarchy and Tyrants, with only a brief "golden age." Greece was a virtual annex of Macedonia and Rome for the following millenia.
Rome built a centralized world empire of millions of people, excelled to a point infinitely beyond the Greeks in all aspects of technology and culture, build vast townships, cities, incorporated thousands of distinict nationalities, brought every great empire down to its knees and incorporated them. It build roads that crisscrosed the world, great ships and endless documentation and education. It converted 30% of the known world's population into slaves to propel its economy. It established an economy that reached the far reaches of Asia and was integrated with Rome. Rome and Constantiople were like New York if you take Athens as a small town. Compared to the running strip at Olympus They had sports arenas that sat hundreds of thousands: like the Coliseum and the HIppodrome at Constantinople.
For a thousand years after the fall of Rome the Byzantine Empire remained the most powerful and richest country in Europe - until the 1500s. The Holy Roman Empire, the biggest nation in Europe proper (germany and surronding areas) continued the traditions of Rome and operated with its name. This was the most powerful nation in Europe proper until the 1700s. Charlemange made himself the Roman Emperor, Rome continued as the base of the Vatican and the whole of western Christianity. Papal authority commanded all Kings. From Constantinople the Eastern Orthodox religion was run.
The Crusades came from both of their authorities.
I could go on.
| While it seems that you have read some history there are a few points in your response not really valid... It is indeed true that Greece in the ancient times consisted of 'polis-krati' meaning small almost independent cities that fought with each other - i.e. Athens, Sparta etc. The Macedonian Empire was the first to unite almost all of them under one rule (not solely by peaceful means...)
When did Persians conquer Greece and not the other way round? Unless there is a historic conspiracy that Greeks indeed conquered the Persian Empire in the times of Alexander the Great...
Probably everything with Greece and Athens is overemphasised because some of the things we now take for granted were made and told first time there more than 2000 years ago... and no, I don't believe that Greece is the only great civilisation, I can name a handful at least...
|
Posted By: akamaisondufromage
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 14:05
Slartibartfast wrote:
That's such a hard question. I'll give it to England for the invention of the black pudding. |
Please lets not turn it into a debate on the Health Service - lets turn it into a debate on BLACK PUDDING. Although we will take the credit for inventing it - I'm not sure it's true. You can get Morcilla in Spain and probably elsewhere? And I think Morcilla is preferable to our noble offering.
No doubt the French, Greeks and Italians too have their own Black pudding too?
------------- Help me I'm falling!
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 14:34
I'm pretty sure the Spaniards should be offended for not being included in this poll.
|
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 14:42
akamaisondufromage wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
That's such a hard question. I'll give it to England for the invention of the black pudding. |
Please lets not turn it into a debate on the Health Service - lets turn it into a debate on BLACK PUDDING. Although we will take the credit for inventing it - I'm not sure it's true. You can get Morcilla in Spain and probably elsewhere? And I think Morcilla is preferable to our noble offering.
No doubt the French, Greeks and Italians too have their own Black pudding too? |
We do have sausages made with blood in Italy, though I have never tried them. However, even if we didn't, we have a lot of other interesting delicacies made with all kinds of body parts.
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 14:49
Perhaps that's why the Romans invented vomitoria
------------- What?
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 14:59
Posted By: RoyFairbank
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 16:48
aapatsos wrote:
RoyFairbank wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
I'd put Greece and Rome on pretty even footing. But Greece did a lot of things first whereas the Romans copied them and improved on their ideas. So Greece it is. |
This is a very typical approach to history. Greece was to Rome what Rome is to us today (and there are more of us). But that's just a superficial approach.
Greece was a Polis culture, i.e. vast wilderness doted with a few tiny slave labor and peasant requisition supported cities who formed no whole country or nation. It had limited grasp and nothing compared to the Macedonian Empire or later Roman Empire. While the Greek economy was the most advanced of the time other major civilizations competed with Greece: the Egyptians and Persians for example. The Persians are major Eastern civilization and it was the Persians who almost conquered Greece, not the other way round.
Almost everything with Greece is overemphasised. Even compared to other epochs the ruling class has been bloated in historical consciousness to the point of obscuring how it teetered on a primitive and volatile base. Athens is overemphaized. A single dot on the dark, dark map, its "democratic" council of lord slave/landowners was a product of its secure economic position. Otherwise Greece was ruled by Oligarchy and Tyrants, with only a brief "golden age." Greece was a virtual annex of Macedonia and Rome for the following millenia.
Rome built a centralized world empire of millions of people, excelled to a point infinitely beyond the Greeks in all aspects of technology and culture, build vast townships, cities, incorporated thousands of distinict nationalities, brought every great empire down to its knees and incorporated them. It build roads that crisscrosed the world, great ships and endless documentation and education. It converted 30% of the known world's population into slaves to propel its economy. It established an economy that reached the far reaches of Asia and was integrated with Rome. Rome and Constantiople were like New York if you take Athens as a small town. Compared to the running strip at Olympus They had sports arenas that sat hundreds of thousands: like the Coliseum and the HIppodrome at Constantinople.
For a thousand years after the fall of Rome the Byzantine Empire remained the most powerful and richest country in Europe - until the 1500s. The Holy Roman Empire, the biggest nation in Europe proper (germany and surronding areas) continued the traditions of Rome and operated with its name. This was the most powerful nation in Europe proper until the 1700s. Charlemange made himself the Roman Emperor, Rome continued as the base of the Vatican and the whole of western Christianity. Papal authority commanded all Kings. From Constantinople the Eastern Orthodox religion was run.
The Crusades came from both of their authorities.
I could go on.
| While it seems that you have read some history there are a few points in your response not really valid... It is indeed true that Greece in the ancient times consisted of 'polis-krati' meaning small almost independent cities that fought with each other - i.e. Athens, Sparta etc. The Macedonian Empire was the first to unite almost all of them under one rule (not solely by peaceful means...)
When did Persians conquer Greece and not the other way round? Unless there is a historic conspiracy that Greeks indeed conquered the Persian Empire in the times of Alexander the Great...
Probably everything with Greece and Athens is overemphasised because some of the things we now take for granted were made and told first time there more than 2000 years ago... and no, I don't believe that Greece is the only great civilisation, I can name a handful at least...
|
These seem to be half hearted ripostes. You seem to consider the Macedonian Empire which subjugated Greece in its period of decline (and by Greece we always mean the completely independent cities and not really any expanse of territory). The classical Greek period is the period of Greek Civilization. By Alexander's time they had ceased to be the chief economical force on the planet and ceased to be the chief repository of culture. Alexandria, home of the Library, was founded in Egypt. Macadonia a hundred years after Greece's classical period was led by a Macadonian racial and originating ruling class. Macedonia had to rely on expansion, and they conquered the backwards empires of the Near East, bringing Slave economy to them, thus advancing the form of property that made Greece powerful and also ending Greeces advantage. When Persia was conquered it was another just another subject, however, a much more important one than another complete subject: Greece.
Xerxes and the Persians engaged in massive land-battles on the Greek mainland that required temporary unity between the cities. Only by the great demands on transportation for the Persians and a heroic effort of Greece's armies was a conquest of Greece prevented. No such operation could even be imagined by Athens or Sparta or their respective leagues at any time in their history. The main influence Greece had was the colonial spread of Greek people. Only again however, they were unable to expand their slave economy, leaving it to the Macedonian empire and Roman Empire. The whole epoch is realized in terms of the conquest of the Slave and peasant requsition social system just as we see in the modern era empire "civilizations" which forced in short order the complete capitalization of the world economy and social system, i.e. Western European colonial powers, especially England in the later periods, then the United States.
It is these powers and civilizations that sum the epoch and Rome summed that epoch in the same way. Greece is a bud, Rome is a flower.
I'd rest my case but It its been sleeping for days.
|
Posted By: aapatsos
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 17:33
^ There is no reason for me to produce 'half hearted ripostes' - history is clearly written and the contribution of each great, greater and smaller civilisation has been recorded - but I don't understand the bias of your responses
by Greece we mean all the independent cities as you say - Pella, Thessaloniki, Thebae, Athens, Sparta etc.
|
Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: May 21 2009 at 02:55
Slartibartfast wrote:
I'm pretty sure the Spaniards should be offended for not being included in this poll. |
I spend about 10-15 per cent of the year in Spain and that 10-15 per cent of me is not offended.
However I promise next time I'm there I'll ask a random selection of folks around town if they, as indigenous Spaniards, are offended that they are not included in our poll. I will ask in a diplomatic fashion, but as my Spanish is not all that good yet this line of questiioning may spark a major international incident.
Or we could save me the effort by just asking the Spanish guys on the site
PS Other nations as well as Scotland and Ireland have bagpipes too, but I can't remember which.
------------- It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
|
Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: May 21 2009 at 02:59
I've tried Morcilla (although they call it something else in Mallorca, I think), and It's good.
Of course we have white pudding here too, and a traditional Irish breakfast is not complete without a slice of the black or the white.
Viva la Black Pudding Debate
------------- It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
|
Posted By: Zargus
Date Posted: May 21 2009 at 05:19
the ancient Greece nuff said.
-------------
|
|