Print Page | Close Window

Jethro Tull: hopeless devotion or hatred

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
Forum Description: Discuss specific prog bands and their members or a specific sub-genre
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=57990
Printed Date: November 26 2024 at 02:43
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Jethro Tull: hopeless devotion or hatred
Posted By: American Khatru
Subject: Jethro Tull: hopeless devotion or hatred
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 07:39
Hey all.  I recently made a new friend with whom I can talk endlessly about prog, which of course is a real joy in life.  I got around to bringing up Tull and he just went feh!, categorically hates them.  I didn't push it since this is a new friend, plus his hatred was so visceral I'd probably have no shot at persuading him otherwise, or even convincing him to give them a fair shot (maybe after a while, but probably not).

I've noticed this with other people too and this band.  Now as for me, I'm what you might call a hopeless fan.  Often times I can't even see the criticisms.  That's because I've been listening to them since I can remember; my older brother's record collection is to blame.  Throughout the 70's I listened a lot, religiously at points, to every Tull album he had, namely Stand Up, Benefit, Aqualung, Living In The Past, Thick As A Brick, Passion Play, Minstrel In The Gallery, and Songs From The Wood.  (TaaB, Passion and Wood would in time shake out as my top favorites.)  Along came the paper route and I bought Heavy Horses and Stormwatch, and a friend taped Too Old for me (didn't like that one much).  I bought 'A' right when it came out too, and that right there is the proof that I'm hopeless.  Can somebody else tell me they love that particular album too?, because I just listened to it yesterday; I haven't met anyone who likes that album, let alone a person who likes it as much as I do.  I just listened to it yesterday, and when I look at my play counts in iTunes I have to say it is way up there.  I might just be Wacko or a Clown, or both rolled into one immense Geek.  (Okay, enough of the faces...)

Back to my new friend: he hates them.  And it's, well, basically because Ian Anderson can apparently be a real, er, doosh.  Now, I had no way of knowing this when I was a kid (except maybe the lyrics!; but music was my main thing, and being a prog fan one abides silly lyrics, lying in wait for the gems).  No internet or any of that, I was just hearing this great effort-filled music and was swept away by it.  My friend didn't grow up on it, and feels certain that he'll never fully appreciate them because of this almost reptilian level of dislike, the sort of thing that no one but a great psychologist could possibly disabuse one of (and the same probably goes for my blind love).

Not long ago I got the CD of TaaB with the bonus tracks.  At points he comes off like a jerk I guess, but mostly sounds to me like a man knowing what he meant.  But of course, nothing embarrassing to hime was about to be put on a Tull CD as a bonus track.  I do think I recall that he has, here and there in interwiews and whatever, derided the idea of concept albums, or otherwise been considered an ass.  Is it fair to say that the figure of Anderson is what gets in the way of appreciation of Tull's music?  Is it the flute, the voice, the man, the codpiece, all of it?  Something else?  Share your proofs, with links if you got 'em.  Thoughts?





Replies:
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 07:57
I have got the same CD, and have listened to that interview. However, I don't think in the least that Ian Anderson comes across as an ass. As big as a prog fan as I am (and I started listening to prog when I was about 11 years old), I have to honestly admit that not all concept albums can be called successful, either in musical or lyrical terms, and that some bands in the Seventies were taking things a bit too far. Moreover, I don't really think Ian was 'deriding' the idea - certainly not in the way the mainstream critics were. Parody has always been present in the arts, and it  often comes from within a genre or movement, rather than from outside it.

Ian Anderson is definitely a strong personality, with some undeniably abrasive traits. However, the fact that he has remained on good terms with most of the musicians he played with (something that can hardly be said of other musicians, who have alienated people left, right and centre) proves that he's not such a horrible human being as some would like to portray him. He's also one hell of a great songwriter and lyricist, and - last but not least - a big cat fanHeart. I really don't understand how he could give rise to such hatred in people like your friend - but heck, we're all different, aren't we?


Posted By: American Khatru
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 08:08
Yeah I guess I was being political or something when I said "comes off like a jerk I guess."  I'm saying this is what some people say who've also heard it.  But me, I don't really think so.  He sounds like a composer if anything; call that pretentious and you insult high musical art.  But what do I know...

As for my mention of 'derision', you can see that I didn't say it was in that interview.  It's something I swear I remember either hearing myself, or someone said he said.


Posted By: cobb2
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 08:34
Ian freely admits that TAAB was done as a farce because of the critics saying that Aqualung was a concept album. Just listen to the tongue-cheek lyrics. Every concert I have seen him perform it at, he always introduces it sneeringly, deriding the concept of progressive music. Is it any wonder that some prog fans may find this annoying.


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 08:41
I've seen and/or heard a few Ian interviews and nothing gave me the impression he was a douche. LOL
The notorious Genesis three have come across that way in interviews.

I'm not really hopelessly devoted to Tull though I am certainly a big fan.


-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: Luke. J
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 09:05
I am somewhere inbetween. While I think Tull are at their best when it comes to a mixture of folk and rock, I can not find anything interesting about the albums considered more "progressive". The album Aqualung totally fails to impress me, TAAB has some good moments, so has A Passion Play. But if you ask me, Songs from the Wood, The Broadsword & The Beast (not that much folk in there, I have to admit) and maybe Heavy Horses are my favourite Tull records, also some "older" folky tunes.
To make it short: I think Anderson's voice and flute don't fit progressive rock as well as folk rock.

Just for the record and the topic: I used to hate Jethro Tull.


Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 13:45
I've never thought of Tull as being that clinically devisive before.
 
I LOVE TAAB ,Aqualung, This Was, Stand Up and lots of tracks from others, but there's a fair bit around that I mildly dislike.
 
Has the OP's friend heard everything or just making a blanket judgement based on hearing a few bits and pieces? Even I haven't heard everything and I'm positively ancientSmile


-------------
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.


Posted By: American Khatru
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 14:26
Originally posted by el dingo el dingo wrote:

Has the OP's friend heard everything or just making a blanket judgement based on hearing a few bits and pieces?  Even I haven't heard everything and I'm positively ancientSmile


Good question - I didn't ask.  It was a real shut-down moment.  I'll ask him next time I see him.  Even so, and maybe some of you out there will identify with this with regard to other bands, if his hatred is really of the deep and ingrained kind, even TAAB might not stand a chance.

Just thought of something.  He has a little daughter.  Perhaps the kid is too young still, but someday she should hear the story of the hare who lost his spectacles (sniff)!





Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 14:35
I know exactly what you mean about a kind of blind loyalty to a certain artist - in this case Tull - and I even wrote a review about exactly that;

../Review.asp?id=197109 - http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=197109





Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 15:00
I have loved Tull's music for many years, especially their folkier side. It is absolutely true that TAAB was penned originally as a massive piss take of the music press and scene of the time, but it was done in such a loving way that I can't really find it in me to criticise. 

-------------
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!


Posted By: American Khatru
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 15:56
Just read your review Atav, very nice job and very well stated.  I think I'm going to have to get that record Smile.

Lazland, succinctly said.  I agree entirely.  We have something here: I learn in the course of life that TAAB was a huge poke at the press and I see it as just another level added to a monumental work, the farce deepened; another person, not well disposed toward our codpieced piper, might hear the same thing and think, yeah that guy's a self-important ass.



Posted By: PROGMONSTER2008
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 20:28

Tull are the ultimate band and Ian the ultimate song writer imo. But I happen to find alot of their songs I'm not much of a fan of are the songs they chose to release on albums. I think Tull could produce great songs whenever they felt like it, but they took risks at recording commerical songs for some albums. I'm not really a fan of Side 2 of Aqualung. I find it pretty straight forward and ian sings with an annoying voice, but it's obvious the band were taking risks. If you want to hear Tull doing great stuff in that same year, you just have to look at the EP they released as well as Side 1 of Aqualung. The band must have recorded about 20 songs in 1971, but I believe they released the weakest 5 songs of that year on Aqualung(Side 2). If Ian wasn't looking for a few dollars he probably wouldn't have written commercial tunes. Same with warchild. It's a soundtrack(11 songs) mainly full of commercial tunes, apart from 2 or 3 cool tracks. But the real Tull songs are the 7 bonus tracks. There's enough gems in 1971(12 out of 20 songs) and 1974(10 out of 18 songs) to say to me that half the songs on original Aqualung and Warchild albums were below Tulls standards but mainly written for commercial purposed Wink. I think these 2 albums would be reasons why many prog fans think Tull were overrated. But if they can get a hold of the remasters plus Living in the past, they'll see the band produced plenty of quality folk/prog rock in those 2 years and the original 11 tracks chosen for each album doesn't quite represent the band imo



-------------
Jazz/Classical Rock(70's style prog/fusion). Lots of prog keys and melodies(all original ideas)
http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008


Posted By: Nipsey88
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 21:22
Not much to add to this thread, other than to tell the OP that I love "A" as well...Smile

In fact, I greatly enjoy almost all of their albums...sorry "Too Old..."

Oh, and J-Tull.com was a bit of a snore...but other than that...


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Nipsey88/?chartstyle=myspace02" rel="nofollow">



Posted By: crimhead
Date Posted: May 16 2009 at 22:47
I saw and enjoyed them on the War Child tour. All the interviews that I have heard with Ian, he comes off as nothing more than a down to earth guy that appreciates what music has given him.


Posted By: PROGMONSTER2008
Date Posted: May 17 2009 at 02:26
Originally posted by Nipsey88 Nipsey88 wrote:

Not much to add to this thread, other than to tell the OP that I love "A" as well...Smile

In fact, I greatly enjoy almost all of their albums...sorry "Too Old..."

Oh, and J-Tull.com was a bit of a snore...but other than that...
 
I really like A too. But Dotcom is cool Smile
Awol, Wicked windows, Dotcom, Dog ear years, Far Alaska, It all trickles down(outtake) are enough great tunes for me Wink


-------------
Jazz/Classical Rock(70's style prog/fusion). Lots of prog keys and melodies(all original ideas)
http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008


Posted By: American Khatru
Date Posted: May 17 2009 at 07:11
More love for 'A'.  Nice to have company. 

Originally posted by PROGMONSTER2008 PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:

If you want to hear Tull doing great stuff in that same year, you just have to look at the EP they released...

I didn't have or know about that EP growing up, but I did have Living in the Past.  And it just so happens that every track on the mentioned EP is a track of which I wore out the grooves on LitP.  Great post well stated.  Agree about Warchild, it's good but I find I don't give it much time.

As for the countless others here who've said what a good man Anderson is, I personally have no reason to disagree (and didn't from the beginning - I may not have made the clear).  I love him, his acerbity and the whole thing.  As for other people disliking him, I guess we can just chalk it up to an old story in the world: strong personalities always get a lot of flack from some quarters, especially during their productive lives; though they may have done little to deserve it, the tiniest flaw, perhaps something not even a flaw in the light of truth, gets blown all out of proportion.




Posted By: PROGMONSTER2008
Date Posted: May 18 2009 at 06:38
Originally posted by American Khatru American Khatru wrote:

More love for 'A'.  Nice to have company. 

Originally posted by PROGMONSTER2008 PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:

If you want to hear Tull doing great stuff in that same year, you just have to look at the EP they released...

I didn't have or know about that EP growing up, but I did have Living in the Past.  And it just so happens that every track on the mentioned EP is a track of which I wore out the grooves on LitP.  Great post well stated.  Agree about Warchild, it's good but I find I don't give it much time.

As for the countless others here who've said what a good man Anderson is, I personally have no reason to disagree (and didn't from the beginning - I may not have made the clear).  I love him, his acerbity and the whole thing.  As for other people disliking him, I guess we can just chalk it up to an old story in the world: strong personalities always get a lot of flack from some quarters, especially during their productive lives; though they may have done little to deserve it, the tiniest flaw, perhaps something not even a flaw in the light of truth, gets blown all out of proportion.


 
If you haven't got the Warchild remaster you need to get it. You'll almost find an album of tunes you wished Tull released in 1974. The 7 bonus tracks are the type of songs you would expect Tull to record after hearing so much great music from 1971, 72 and 73 with LITP, Aqualung, TAAB and APP. The 7 bonus tracks are mainly better than almsot all the 11 original songs although i love Queen and country and the title track Smile. There are actually about 11 or 12 extras from 1974. March the mad scientist is also from 1974 and there is an improved version of Bungle too. There are 2 unreleased tracks called Beach parts 1 and 2 also. I have links to 8 of the bonus tracks you can download and hear in full if you like. Very quick downloads. I also have a clip of that Bungle tune too


-------------
Jazz/Classical Rock(70's style prog/fusion). Lots of prog keys and melodies(all original ideas)
http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008


Posted By: Cesar Inca
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 15:29
I really love this band. In my book, the "Heavy Horses" album is one of their masterpieces. Here's a more detailed exposition of my feelings toward this album.-
 

“Heavy Horses” is the logical continuation of the solid prog-folk approach delivered in the “Songs From the Wood” album, and what a lovely follow-up it is. The previous release had been an absolute triumph of Jethro Tull’s ever-present folkish side refurbished and manifested at its maximum potential of sophistication, in no small degree due to the tasteful synth layers and orchestrations provided by John Evan and the new 6th member David (now Dee) Palmer. What “Heavy Horses” brings as a source of refreshment for this new pinnacle era of Jethro Tull is the use of more natural orchestral arrangements (real strings), as well as a special guest called Darryl Way (yes, the virtuosos violinist from Curved Air). Evan restricts himself to organ and piano, and the synth input is not as abundant. Maybe the occasional portative pipe organ handled by Palmer has more presence than the synths, but again, the keyboard efforts are properly stated in the mix. All in all, the items that are more recurrently featured in the mix (besides Anderson’s flute) are the interplaying acoustic/electric guitars and the drums: this album indeed comprises some of the best Barlow work ever, and I’m talking about a musician who always knew how to use his percussive mastery for good effect. As in the “Wood” album (and many other songs from the previous Tull catalogue), the consistent topic of the tracklist focuses on rural things, but now the predominant mood is not one of celebration of the reality and fantasy in the village men’s lives: “Heavy Horses” is an overall look at the pros and cons of the life (lovely life, after all) in a farm amidst our modern urban-centered times. ‘… And the Mouse Police Never Sleeps’ is a catchy tune about cats watching for mice in their role of countrymen’s best friends; its playful mood is properly perpetuated in the romancing ‘Acres Wild’ and the candid ‘Moths’. Caught between these colorful songs is the grayish ‘No Lullaby’, full of intense rocking sounds and patently prog-oriented shifts. This song signifies a particular apex for Barre and Barlow as performers. ‘Journeyman’ ends the album’s first half with a featured rhythm section that emulates the driving dynamics of a vehicle with funky-friendly swings that oddly feed the song’s basic blues-rock feel. ‘Rover’ brings back the album’s most candid side with well-ordained flourishes that echo the explicit splendor of “Songs From the Wood”, in this way opening the album’s second half in a very exciting way. ‘One Brown Mouse’ is less ornamented but still displays a similar colorfulness – the rural mood works beautifully. But the source of superior beauty comes with the penultimate track, the namesake one, which IMHO is one of the finest Anderson moments as a writer and a poet. This mini-epic that almost totals a 9 minute span celebrates the ancient power of farm horses while calibrating the negative side brought by tractors and other industrial artifacts. The soft piano-vocal passages, the orchestrations exquisite beyond words, the melodic development of the guitar leads and Way’s violin inputs, the fluid sequences between various moods and time signatures, all of them gather together in a perfectly logical framework that capitalizes the song’s beautiful melodic lines. Epic and magical, with a lovely mixture of melancholy and naivety in the lyrics that make sense with the musical material – ‘Heavy Horses’ is a Top 5 song in JT’s history. The album’s closer ‘Weathercock’ brings back a moment of final optimism to complete the tracklist on a pertinently candid note. This album is a must in any rock collection (prog and not prog), and definitely, a wonderful masterpiece from a band whose heyday was still running on by the late 70s.  



Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 20 2009 at 15:30
Oh, no!  Italics, run away, run away! Tongue

-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: progrules
Date Posted: May 21 2009 at 04:45
I'm a bit in between where Tull's concerned. I only really love Locomotive Breath as a song. Aqualung and TaaB are good/very good songs. But I really can't understand the adoration for the band. I mean, of course everyone is allowed to, why not ? But I just can't see the huge class the album TaaB has.
In my review I even stated that the interview was the best part. That was a little harsh and cynical really but I meant by it that I do like the interview and am not blown away by the epics. No more and no less.
And by liking the interview it shows that I have no problem with Andersons personality.


-------------
A day without prog is a wasted day


Posted By: b_olariu
Date Posted: May 21 2009 at 05:01
I love Tull, one of the most chalenging and brilliant bands ever grace the prog music. Not only Anderson is major figure in prog music and music in general, but the whole rest of the musicians who contributet to the succes this band had in the '70's is imense and without doubt  very unique and with great value.OK Ian Anderson is among my top 3 lyricist ever, very profound and you have to be open minded to understand the core of his lyrics.  My fav Tull albums are in this order
 1.Songs from the wood
2.Passion play
3.A
4. and the whole rest


Posted By: Toaster Mantis
Date Posted: May 21 2009 at 05:13
I'm a big fan of Jethro Tull but I'm not really a fanboy... I find their post-Songs from the Wood career extremely spotty, and recently I've started to think that some of their really long numbers go on a bit too long though with Thick as a Brick that's probably part of the joke. Speaking of Thick as a Brick, to be honest I wouldn't have figured out it was a parody if Ian hadn't said so because all of Jethro Tull's albums have a lot of humorous lyrics. Maybe this is more evidence that a good parody also works as an example of what it's making fun of?

As for Ian's disillusionment with the progressive rock scene? Well, in my experience really influential musicians usually dislike most of their imitators so that's just par for the course and Ian's nowhere as bad about it as other carriers of what I call "Robert Fripp syndrome". LOL

I'd actually be more bothered by this if it was from a much newer band because those give off a much bigger "too cool for class" feeling if they try criticizing the scene, but artists that have been pioneers of a genre have earned every right to comment critically on it. They know what it's supposed to be all about, so they can distance it from the "scene" without being condescending or hypocritical.

So, while Mr. Anderson might be a bit too cynical for his own good it doesn't make me dislike him that much because I don't find it that anomalous coming from him.


-------------
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook


Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 09:50
How can you "hate" someone if you`ve never met them? Duhhh.

-------------
                


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 13:38
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

How can you "hate" someone if you`ve never met them? Duhhh.

I dunno, I hate everyone I've never met. Tongue


Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 13:48
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

How can you "hate" someone if you`ve never met them? Duhhh.

I dunno, I hate everyone I've never met. Tongue
 
So you hate Winona Ryder, Marlilyn Monroe and my Mrs then?Tongue


-------------
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 13:52
Well, I haven't met any of them yet, but If I hate everyone I've ever met then, oh what the hell, I'd probably like them.Tongue


Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 13:55
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Well, I haven't met any of them yet, but If I hate everyone I've ever met then, oh what the hell, I'd probably like them.Tongue
 
Ain't it great to stay on topic!Wink


-------------
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 14:14
After a point, what's the point?

-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: Matthew T
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 16:03
I don't care about Ian Anderson personally but I know one thing and that is I like Jethro TullThumbs Up I can't say they are my most played band but I sure played these albums in the seventies.In order of preference
Aqualung
Thick as a Brick
Warchild


-------------
Matt



Posted By: lucas
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 17:16
I love their seventies discography. 'A' is good also.
Barriemore Barlow was a great improvement to their sound. Probably the prog band who released the highest amount of quality albums with King Crimson.


-------------
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)


Posted By: Alberto Muñoz
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 17:51
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

After a point, what's the point?
This is the point
.Wink


-------------






Posted By: American Khatru
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 17:53
They do have a high amount of very good-to-great albums.  I just listened to Stand Up at work today.  Just thinking, following Lucas' post, I get a picture pretty well unmatched by any other band in the genre. 

If I count what I consider to be the "very good-to-great" albums I get a solid 14 years, 1969-1982.  Within that period, excepting the two year wait before Broadsword, an album was released every year!  (I leave out This Was because it's not really yet the Tull sound, and the all-important Barre isn't there; and for me the machine comes to a stop with Broadsword, though there are of course some things of merit after that.)  Throw in the stupendous Life Is A Long Song E.P. of 1971 (thank you progmonster2008) and you have 14 studio releases and very little to complain about.  You have to admit, that beez impressiveApprove.  More than most bands can say.  I love King Crimson just as much as Tull, but their prolific output does admittedly travel through quite different line ups, with of course some big gaps in there for other projects and whatever.


Edit:  Shouldn't forget the songs Sweet Dream and Witche's Promise, released 1969.  Amazing and immediate Grand sound from a band that just started! ../album.asp?id=22493 -


Posted By: American Khatru
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 17:54
oh, and I may have started the thread, but I love the off topic stuff.  you guys r funny.


Posted By: PROGMONSTER2008
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 18:52
Originally posted by American Khatru American Khatru wrote:

They do have a high amount of very good-to-great albums.  I just listened to Stand Up at work today.  Just thinking, following Lucas' post, I get a picture pretty well unmatched by any other band in the genre. 

If I count what I consider to be the "very good-to-great" albums I get a solid 14 years, 1969-1982.  Within that period, excepting the two year wait before Broadsword, an album was released every year!  (I leave out This Was because it's not really yet the Tull sound, and the all-important Barre isn't there; and for me the machine comes to a stop with Broadsword, though there are of course some things of merit after that.)  Throw in the stupendous Life Is A Long Song E.P. of 1971 (thank you progmonster2008) and you have 14 studio releases and very little to complain about.  You have to admit, that beez impressiveApprove.  More than most bands can say.  I love King Crimson just as much as Tull, but their prolific output does admittedly travel through quite different line ups, with of course some big gaps in there for other projects and whatever.


Edit:  Shouldn't forget the songs Sweet Dream and Witche's Promise, released 1969.  Amazing and immediate Grand sound from a band that just started! ../album.asp?id=22493 -
 
Well you must include all remastered versions of each album Tongue
 
Even This Was has some real cool tunes, expecially the bonus tracks Love story, xmas song
 
I'm surprised you haven't mentioned the 90s remasters and relative outtakes Wink
 
Dotcom + it all trickles down(outtake)
Roots to branches
Catfish rising remaster( with bonus track 'night in the wilderness') + silver river turning, truck stop runner(outtakes)
 
If you have the remasters of these 3 and you add those 3 extra outtakes, then you trim those 3 albums down to the 10 best songs (including the bonus tracks and outtakes) then you have 3 very good albums which are even better than some of the 70s albums(or even revised 70s albums using the bonus tracks) Smile
 


-------------
Jazz/Classical Rock(70's style prog/fusion). Lots of prog keys and melodies(all original ideas)
http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 19:05
Jethro Tull?  neither devotion or hatred... not good enough to be devoted to... not bad enough to hate them haha..

just think large portions of their discography are completely average at best..... but what I love... I truly love.. mainly those first 4 albums.  Heart


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: PROGMONSTER2008
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 19:15
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Jethro Tull?  neither devotion or hatred... not good enough to be devoted to... not bad enough to hate them haha..

just think large portions of their discography are completely average at best..... but what I love... I truly love.. mainly those first 4 albums.  Heart
 
There's not 1 single weak remaster Tongue
Just go over each remaster and LITP and pick the best 10 songs from each year and you have lots of strong compilations for each year from 1969-1982 Smile


-------------
Jazz/Classical Rock(70's style prog/fusion). Lots of prog keys and melodies(all original ideas)
http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 19:20
^ more power to you brother Clap  They sure as hell wouldn't have had the career they did if everyone felt as I do hahahha.  

-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: PROGMONSTER2008
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 19:27
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

^ more power to you brother Clap  They sure as hell wouldn't have had the career they did if everyone felt as I do hahahha.  
 
Without the bonus tracks, i'd only say taab, heavy horses, songs from the wood, litp and bursting out are strong releases. Which would make me sound like you Wink. But with bonus tracks, it is proved Warchild could have been another strong album if it wasn't a soundtrack, Aqualung could have been great if Side 2 was made of songs such as life is a long song, dr bogenbroom, for later, wondring again, up the pool Tongue. Stormwatch, Benefit and Stand up could have gained an extra star if the singles/bonus tracks were included instead of some other songs Smile. Broadsword could have been better with the use of some bonus tracks too LOL


-------------
Jazz/Classical Rock(70's style prog/fusion). Lots of prog keys and melodies(all original ideas)
http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 19:32
Raff is the Tull fan of the two of us...  she has all the remasters...  I've heard all the albums of course.. but probably not many of the later bonus tracks...

if they were like the bonus tracks on the early ones I'd be a happy man.. which I'd bet my paycheck they aren't LOL

I'm a firm believer in the notion of 'finite creativity'...  Anderson was and IS a great showman.. and could and DID write some great songs... but his songwriting talent was overwhelmed by the shear volume of their output IMO.  Oh well... I will take a listen to those later albums and their bonus tracks this weekend.


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: PROGMONSTER2008
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 21:14
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Raff is the Tull fan of the two of us...  she has all the remasters...  I've heard all the albums of course.. but probably not many of the later bonus tracks...

if they were like the bonus tracks on the early ones I'd be a happy man.. which I'd bet my paycheck they aren't LOL

I'm a firm believer in the notion of 'finite creativity'...  Anderson was and IS a great showman.. and could and DID write some great songs... but his songwriting talent was overwhelmed by the shear volume of their output IMO.  Oh well... I will take a listen to those later albums and their bonus tracks this weekend.
 
Trust me Smile
I was always a bit disappointed with Warchild and thought, Tull are better than this. But when I got the remaster I listened to the 7 bonus tracks and realised the band were still producing the same great music, but the original 11 songs were done for sound track purposes for a movie. So if you want to hear the real Tull of 1974, just listen to the bonus tracks. Don't forget that Skating away and Solitaire were written in 1973 for the Chateau sessions. So what we have newly written in 1974 is 7 tull songs(bonus tracks) and 9 playful soundtrack songs(not really tull, made purposely for a movie). But I must say Queen and Country and Warchild(title track) are pretty damn cool soundtrack songs Smile


-------------
Jazz/Classical Rock(70's style prog/fusion). Lots of prog keys and melodies(all original ideas)
http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 21:23
As Micky, neither devotion or hatred, they are great, but there are too many great bands in the same level out there to swear eternal devotion to all of them.
 
Iván
 


-------------
            


Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 21:35
Originally posted by PROGMONSTER2008 PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:

I was always a bit disappointed with Warchild and thought, Tull are better than this. But when I got the remaster I listened to the 7 bonus tracks and realised the band were still producing the same great music, but the original 11 songs were done for sound track purposes for a movie. So if you want to hear the real Tull of 1974, just listen to the bonus tracks. Don't forget that Skating away and Solitaire were written in 1973 for the Chateau sessions. So what we have newly written in 1974 is 7 tull songs(bonus tracks) and 9 playful soundtrack songs(not really tull, made purposely for a movie). But I must say Queen and Country and Warchild(title track) are pretty damn cool soundtrack songs Smile


those extras are superb, 'Paradise Steakhouse' for one not to mention 'Kelpie' from Stormwatch, and if you really wanna indulge in extras try something like the Flawed Gems and the Other Sides of Tull CD from the 20 Years set

they deserve every bit of devotion they get, to continue on so long and continue to do great things, amazing







Posted By: PROGMONSTER2008
Date Posted: May 22 2009 at 22:33
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by PROGMONSTER2008 PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:

I was always a bit disappointed with Warchild and thought, Tull are better than this. But when I got the remaster I listened to the 7 bonus tracks and realised the band were still producing the same great music, but the original 11 songs were done for sound track purposes for a movie. So if you want to hear the real Tull of 1974, just listen to the bonus tracks. Don't forget that Skating away and Solitaire were written in 1973 for the Chateau sessions. So what we have newly written in 1974 is 7 tull songs(bonus tracks) and 9 playful soundtrack songs(not really tull, made purposely for a movie). But I must say Queen and Country and Warchild(title track) are pretty damn cool soundtrack songs Smile


those extras are superb, 'Paradise Steakhouse' for one not to mention 'Kelpie' from Stormwatch, and if you really wanna indulge in extras try something like the Flawed Gems and the Other Sides of Tull CD from the 20 Years set

they deserve every bit of devotion they get, to continue on so long and continue to do great things, amazing





 
I have everything from the band. Love the bonus tracks on Stormwatch and Warchild. Everyone of them are very cool. I really like the 90s Tull too


-------------
Jazz/Classical Rock(70's style prog/fusion). Lots of prog keys and melodies(all original ideas)
http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008


Posted By: American Khatru
Date Posted: May 23 2009 at 06:12
Originally posted by PROGMONSTER2008 PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:

Originally posted by American Khatru American Khatru wrote:

They do have a high amount of very good-to-great albums.  I just listened to Stand Up at work today.  Just thinking, following Lucas' post, I get a picture pretty well unmatched by any other band in the genre. 

If I count what I consider to be the "very good-to-great" albums I get a solid 14 years, 1969-1982.  Within that period, excepting the two year wait before Broadsword, an album was released every year!  (I leave out This Was because it's not really yet the Tull sound, and the all-important Barre isn't there; and for me the machine comes to a stop with Broadsword, though there are of course some things of merit after that.)  Throw in the stupendous Life Is A Long Song E.P. of 1971 (thank you progmonster2008) and you have 14 studio releases and very little to complain about.  You have to admit, that beez impressiveApprove.  More than most bands can say.  I love King Crimson just as much as Tull, but their prolific output does admittedly travel through quite different line ups, with of course some big gaps in there for other projects and whatever.


Edit:  Shouldn't forget the songs Sweet Dream and Witche's Promise, released 1969.  Amazing and immediate Grand sound from a band that just started! ../album.asp?id=22493 -
 
Well you must include all remastered versions of each album Tongue
 
Even This Was has some real cool tunes, expecially the bonus tracks Love story, xmas song
 
I'm surprised you haven't mentioned the 90s remasters and relative outtakes Wink
 
Dotcom + it all trickles down(outtake)
Roots to branches
Catfish rising remaster( with bonus track 'night in the wilderness') + silver river turning, truck stop runner(outtakes)
 
If you have the remasters of these 3 and you add those 3 extra outtakes, then you trim those 3 albums down to the 10 best songs (including the bonus tracks and outtakes) then you have 3 very good albums which are even better than some of the 70s albums(or even revised 70s albums using the bonus tracks) Smile
 


Holy smokes!  You seem like a respectable chappy (or lass, I don't know), so if you're saying this and that means that there's even a possibility that I could agree if I heard it all, then I am one happy Tull fan to know that there is yet more material to hear!

Forgive me: though I do have cd transfers or cds bought years back (which were not then blessed with extras), my familiarity is almost all from my collection of these odd and somewhat cumbersome flat black objects which are gingerly placed on a form-fitting rotatable surface to then receive a needle to their faceBig smile.  In other words, bit of an old fart here I guess (ah, I don't guess).  Anyway, I am grateful and eager, when I can afford it, to get me paws on these extra tracks.  This music in waiting, though a small thing to some, just made life more deee-licious.Big smileBig smile



Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 23 2009 at 08:48
I really like the remasters with the bonus tracks.  The A with the DVD is pretty cool, too.  My latest addition is Nightcap with the Chateau.  Quite pleased with that.

-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: AlanOB
Date Posted: May 23 2009 at 08:58
They're incredibly hit and miss really.

Thick as a Brick and Aqualung are two stone cold five star classics, without question.

Yet albums like Passion Play and Minstrel are simply above average.

And some of the later stuff is dire.


Posted By: A B Negative
Date Posted: May 23 2009 at 09:46
Originally posted by American Khatru American Khatru wrote:

Ian Anderson can apparently be a real, er, doosh
 
Should that be the criterion of whether you like a band or not? I love Ted Nugent's music, but as a person...
 
Tull have some great albums and some that aren't so great.


-------------
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."


Posted By: Bufo
Date Posted: June 08 2009 at 00:54
Hopeless devotion?  No.  Hatred?  Never.  Not even Rock Island, which is merely disappointing.  Well, very disappointing.

These days, I like when Ian writes clever songs and melodies in the limited range he can comfortably sing, especially Secret Language of Birds but also Roots to Branches.  The 70s stuff was my favorite.  Most of Stormwatch and Too Old To Rock 'n' Roll (just not the title track) still sound great to me.


Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: June 08 2009 at 00:58
I think Rock Island is fine considering how much material they'd done by then, certainly beats Under Wraps and was a solid followup to Crest 


Posted By: Bufo
Date Posted: June 08 2009 at 01:03
Yes, Under Wraps.  Not my career highlight either!  Still, the tour was good.  I stood on my chair and was very excited. Tongue


Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: June 08 2009 at 01:08
I saw that one..I think I enjoyed the 2001 Best Of tour most of the six or so times I've seen them




Posted By: Bufo
Date Posted: June 08 2009 at 01:18
I saw Tull several times after 1984 too, but they never had as much energy.  When I saw them in 1995, Ian had virtually no singing voice that night and could barely utter a sound, so the audience talked over the entire show, except for the loud rocky bits.

Living with the Past is a good example, I think, of the band still sounding great but being none too energetic.  Comes with age, I know, but Ian looked like he'd aged 20 years between the Under Wraps and Crest of a Knave tours, IMO.


Posted By: Bufo
Date Posted: June 08 2009 at 01:28
Yes, in the late 90s, his singing started sounding much better, but that could be that he was no longer straining for the high notes he could no longer sing.  I think he can only comfortably handle about half an octave, which isn't much for a songwriter to work with, though what he's done on his recent Tull and solo albums is very good (and better - just so long as it isn't a cover of older material - the cover of Jack Frost and the Hooded Crow on the Christmas Album comes to mind.)

But the flute playing.  That's become simply stunning.  I guess since his daughter showed him how to finger the flute properly (!) he's truly become a master of the instrument, requisite Roland Kirk impression notwithstanding. Smile


Posted By: American Khatru
Date Posted: June 08 2009 at 06:04
Originally posted by Bufo Bufo wrote:

...But the flute playing.  That's become simply stunning.


I'm glad you brought this up.  I was just thinking the other day, listening more intently to later Tull than I usually do, followed by a listen to Secret Language, that Anderson's flute playing seems to be greatly improving; as his voice has lost its shine and range, his flute tone has surely gained a deepened humanity.  I found myself seeking out the flute passages.  I haven't heard it more than three times so far, but I believe this may be the key to listening to Secret Language: it sounded, last listening, like Anderson himself probably wrote it more by flute passage than vocal melody, in terms of how one gets from event to event.


Posted By: Bufo
Date Posted: June 08 2009 at 06:15
Wow, that could be it.  And if he's writing for his talents and around his shortcomings, then that's the smart thing to do.

Divinities is all flute, but I never found that to be feature the strongest writing or playing.

All those Bouree-type instrumentals on Christmas Album though, those are a blast and the fluting is excellent.


-------------
Stuck in the '70s


Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: June 09 2009 at 09:54
Fluting ?

-------------
                


Posted By: Roland113
Date Posted: June 09 2009 at 10:06
Eh, I place myself firmly in the "eh, don't have an opinion either way"

-------------
-------someone please tell him to delete this line, he looks like a noob-------

I don't have an unnatural obsession with Disney Princesses, I have a fourteen year old daughter and coping mechanisms.


Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: June 09 2009 at 10:09
But what about the fluting?

-------------
                


Posted By: paulwalker71
Date Posted: June 09 2009 at 13:41
Originally posted by Roland113 Roland113 wrote:

I place myself firmly in the "eh, don't have an opinion either way"


Me too

I remember making a fairly serious attempt to 'get' Jethro Tull back in, I guess, the late 70's - when they were possibly still pretty much at the top of the game. I felt they were a good-to-decent rock band, with plenty of folk stylings which did nothing for me. The big problem with them, for me, is the vocals - I just can't get on with Ian Anderson's nasal tones.

I hear his voice is a bit shot these days - but it never appealed to me even when he was supposedly in his better days.

But that's just me. I don't hate them or anything, but I just don't find them having much appeal to me


Posted By: el dingo
Date Posted: June 09 2009 at 14:26
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

But what about the fluting?
 
The fluting's quite stylish on my neighbour's champagne glasses


-------------
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: June 09 2009 at 14:28
Originally posted by el dingo el dingo wrote:

Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

But what about the fluting?
 
The fluting's quite stylish on my neighbour's champagne glasses

fweeee!!!


-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: PROGMONSTER2008
Date Posted: June 09 2009 at 19:40
Originally posted by American Khatru American Khatru wrote:

Originally posted by Bufo Bufo wrote:

...But the flute playing.  That's become simply stunning.


I'm glad you brought this up.  I was just thinking the other day, listening more intently to later Tull than I usually do, followed by a listen to Secret Language, that Anderson's flute playing seems to be greatly improving; as his voice has lost its shine and range, his flute tone has surely gained a deepened humanity.  I found myself seeking out the flute passages.  I haven't heard it more than three times so far, but I believe this may be the key to listening to Secret Language: it sounded, last listening, like Anderson himself probably wrote it more by flute passage than vocal melody, in terms of how one gets from event to event.
 
How did you go with all those tunes I recommended at my site? LOL
 


-------------
Jazz/Classical Rock(70's style prog/fusion). Lots of prog keys and melodies(all original ideas)
http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008


Posted By: American Khatru
Date Posted: June 10 2009 at 18:39
^
 
Progmonster you old devil! Clap   I've been meaning to write you but hadn't made the time.  I'll get into a little public adoration though, and say that you did a bang up job with the posts I've heard so far (all the bonus tracks from Aqualung through Heavy Horses, the rest with have to wait a bit).  That "Life's a Long Song", did you add those drum tracks (and others)?  In any event, thanks a thousand times!  (I can't remember the site's address off-hand since I'm on a different computer now; if it's cool by the rules, and if I have any say as thread starter, I don't mind if you self-promote it here).  I'll write more another time, but I'll say briefly here that I do definitely love the many Warchild extras.  I didn't know the Sealion's name was Cecil.  Like I said, I'll add more another time.
 
Regards,
AK
 
 


Posted By: PROGMONSTER2008
Date Posted: June 10 2009 at 18:51
Originally posted by American Khatru American Khatru wrote:

^
 
Progmonster you old devil! Clap   I've been meaning to write you but hadn't made the time.  I'll get into a little public adoration though, and say that you did a bang up job with the posts I've heard so far (all the bonus tracks from Aqualung through Heavy Horses, the rest with have to wait a bit).  That "Life's a Long Song", did you add those drum tracks (and others)?  In any event, thanks a thousand times!  (I can't remember the site's address off-hand since I'm on a different computer now; if it's cool by the rules, and if I have any say as thread starter, I don't mind if you self-promote it here).  I'll write more another time, but I'll say briefly here that I do definitely love the many Warchild extras.  I didn't know the Sealion's name was Cecil.  Like I said, I'll add more another time.
 
Regards,
AK
 
 
 
Yeah the bonus tracks are quite often tulls best songs. If I had to choose Tulls 100 best songs, 50 of them would be songs that didn't even make original albums lol. Warchild bonus tracks are the type of songs tull would have released any day of the week in 1974 because they were the natural style of songs they'd write. But being a soundtrack, the album had songs with a more commercial feel. You've probably heard most of the bonus stuff from albums up until mid 70s. Stormwatch, Broadsword, Heavy horses, Catfish, Dotcom has some great bonus stuff too. But the bonus material on each remaster is mainly the best songs or among the best 5 songs on every remastered album. Going back to This Was, my favorite tracks are Love story, One for John Gee, Christmas song and Move on alone. 3 of  those are bonus tracks. Same goes for Stand up where my fave songs are Living in the past, Look into the sun, Sweet dream, Jeffrey goes to Leicester square and Driving song. Same with Benefit, where Witches promise, Teacher, Just trying to be are mainly my faves too. 7 of my fave 10 songs on Warchild are bonus tracks. My fave songs on Minstrel and Too old are, you guessed right, the bonus tracks LOL. The 4 Stormwatch bonus tracks are are among the best 7 or 8 songs on that album too. Some goodies on Broadsword also. The version of Jackalynn on my site is pretty hard to find and it's way better than the other version Wink. Check out Blues instrumental under heavy horses also, that's hard to find too. The last 6 songs on LITP would have made a much better Side of an album than Side 2 of Aqualung. Life is a long is a remix tull did. The drums were very quiet on the old version and it sounded like a rough demo recording lol. Tell me what you think of dotcom songs such as awol, wicked windows, dog ear years, dotcom, hot mango flush, far alaska, it all trickles down(bonus). I reckon it';s the best stuff they have done since the late 70s


-------------
Jazz/Classical Rock(70's style prog/fusion). Lots of prog keys and melodies(all original ideas)
http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008


Posted By: prog4evr
Date Posted: June 12 2009 at 20:27
Only certain JT albums of the 1970s make them notable (IMO) and, of those, only Minstrel in the Gallery and Songs from the Wood stand out.  Generally, JT lost a lot when Glascock died of cancer.  They also lost something when Barlow moved on to a metal band in the 1980s.  Even Jobson joining them on the "A" album didn't rekindle the magic of those two great albums.  When a band like that can also put out Living in the Past with "Bungle in the Jungle," I can see why certain prog fans "hate" them...


Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: June 12 2009 at 20:41
Originally posted by prog4evr prog4evr wrote:

Only certain JT albums of the 1970s make them notable (IMO) and, of those, only Minstrel in the Gallery and Songs from the Wood stand out.  Generally, JT lost a lot when Glascock died of cancer.  They also lost something when Barlow moved on to a metal band in the 1980s.  Even Jobson joining them on the "A" album didn't rekindle the magic of those two great albums.  When a band like that can also put out Living in the Past with "Bungle in the Jungle," I can see why certain prog fans "hate" them...


ooh, fightin' words Wink

Minstrel
and Songs the only 70s standouts for JT ?   Yeeeah, I don't think so, I mean Brick and Horses are just as good in all the ways that make those other albums good.  Makes no sense.  True, 'Bungle' is a shameless pop tune but not bad (as pop goes) and on a very underrated album as Warchild.  Plus it got 'em a bunch of new fans.





Posted By: PROGMONSTER2008
Date Posted: June 12 2009 at 21:56
Originally posted by prog4evr prog4evr wrote:

Only certain JT albums of the 1970s make them notable (IMO) and, of those, only Minstrel in the Gallery and Songs from the Wood stand out.  Generally, JT lost a lot when Glascock died of cancer.  They also lost something when Barlow moved on to a metal band in the 1980s.  Even Jobson joining them on the "A" album didn't rekindle the magic of those two great albums.  When a band like that can also put out Living in the Past with "Bungle in the Jungle," I can see why certain prog fans "hate" them...
 
Living in the past is a great tune. One of the most advanced sounding tunes of the 60s, but Bungle is too pop for me LOL. I don't agree with Minstrel. Not a big fan. Tull put out excellent EP's, some excellent albums and several patchy albums. I don't rate tull by albums, I rate them by the amount of quality songs they wrote each separate year. eg 1971- Life is a long song is an excellent EP of 5 or 6 songs and Aqualung the album is a good album(overrated) with a very good Side 1 and a pretty blande Side 2 imo. So I rate Tull as a great band in 1971 and I put Side 2 of Aqualung down to tull trying to sound commercial to gain more success. But the quality of that EP and Side 1 of Aqualung says that tull are capapable of writing many elite rock songs and when I listen to Side 2 of Aqualung, I say to myself 'tull are better than this and if they weren't looking for extra success they wouldn't have written some of these tune'.


-------------
Jazz/Classical Rock(70's style prog/fusion). Lots of prog keys and melodies(all original ideas)
http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/vigilante2008


Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: June 13 2009 at 00:36
Since I haven't got past Stormwatch yet, I cannot say if I am one whose lot is that of hopeless devotion, i.e, whether I will suffer albums widely considered average/bad gladly just because they are Tull albums.  But what I have heard I love to death.  I only dislike Too Old To Rock N Roll and I am not particularly chuffed about Stormwatch either.  Having said that, it seems to me that Anderson peaked in terms of his musical ideas on TAAB.  I don't think Tull's music got significantly better after that and I also cannot perceive any drastic changes from TAAB through to Heavy Horses.  If I were to make a comparison, I would say Octopus and Free Hand hardly sound like each other; I don't think Tull changed THAT much at least during the 70s.  Since I love all those albums, it doesn't matter to me but I can see how it might be held against the band - re: micky's point about finite ideas and prolific output.  

Coming to the subject of hatred, it wouldn't surprise me if people hated Tull outright and utterly because it can happen with any band, that's why tastes are subjective.  But I don't really understand where people who consider Aqualung/TAAB/APP desert island and then say that the rest of their output is terrible and they wouldn't want to have anything to do with are coming from. Surely they have their valid reasons for such an opinion, I am just saying I can't relate to it because I am not able to perceive such sharp fluctuations in quality  - if you love one of those to death, it seems odd that you'd intensely dislike the rest because they aren't all that different.


Posted By: Sangria
Date Posted: June 14 2009 at 13:52
Hopeless devotion. Although I don't listen to their mainstream stuff (Aqualung, Loco Breath etc..)



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk