Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: General Music Discussions
Forum Description: Discuss and create polls about all types of music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=55509 Printed Date: December 04 2024 at 20:45 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Do you like Never Mind the Bollocks?Posted By: Pnoom!
Subject: Do you like Never Mind the Bollocks?
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 11:07
Simple question. I'm curious how much of the prog community enjoys this album.
IMO, it's a great album and pretty much a flat-out masterpiece.
I might be doing this other albums the prog community loves to hate if this one provides the right sorts of results.
Replies: Posted By: Bj-1
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 11:09
Count me in!
Haven't heard it in ages though, but I've always liked it very much.
------------- RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 11:11
I have no idea.
I heard it maybe a handful of times about 20 years ago.
Posted By: Spenny
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 11:25
I find that it is not a great album, just a collection of single tracks I enjoy some of. I rarely listen to it.
Sandinista! by the Clash, on the other hand, I do go back to time and again. I'd rate the Clash as having many of the attributes of being a prog band, even if they didn't have the typical sound. They mixed musical genres and they progressed musically as they gained experience.
Posted By: Pnoom!
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 11:32
Be fair now, so John Lydon (Johnny Rotten) of the Sex Pistols progressed musically as well.
The album Metal Box by Public Image Ltd. (Lydon's next band) is one of the most punishing and out there rock albums around (at least, among albums that don't go way out to the extremes).
Posted By: Trademark
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 11:32
It's certainly a seminal recording and I like it more than I like a lot of the contemporary punk of the time. For me it doesn't rise to the level of masterpiece or even "punk masterpiece". I have to hold that one back for London Calling or maybe Sound Affects.
It's funny that as I typ[e this I'm actually listening to Arthur Honegger's 2nd symphony.
Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 11:32
I may enjoy punk-rock, but I never liked the Sex Pistols except for a handful of songs ("Anarchy in the UK" and "God Save The Queen"). I've always prefered the Damned or the Buzzcocks whose albums appear as more "solid" to me.
Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 11:44
I had the record. Other than selected songs, I haven't heard it in many years, but, yeah, great album. I should get it again. "Pretty Vacant" was a particular fave of mine , as well as "Anarchy in the UK" as a kid.
I don't know, but I thought this was a verse from "Anarchy in the UK" (probably my own made up verse, but I've now forgotten making it up):
I am an anarchist I don't care about politics I just want to kick in some heads
WARNING - Off-topic:
Incidentally, I like this album picks list that Johnny Rotten (John Lydon) came up with for an interview (before anyone brings up his "I hate Pink Floyd" shirt), which includes Bowie, Peter Hammill, Captain Beefheart, John Cale, Third Ear Band, and Can.
For fun, The Great Rock 'n Roll Swindle's "My Way" (always loved this):
------------- https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts
Posted By: Pnoom!
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 11:49
Lydon has pretty much admitted to being a big fan of prog and other music of the time that punk supposedly rebelled against.
And of course, he was a HUGE Can-freak, so more power to him for that.
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 12:01
I dislike the thing. I dislike most punk, if not all.
Funny how I like a punk-influenced genre like black metal so much.... atmospheres, vocals, themes, many things create that difference...
-------------
Posted By: Fight Club
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 17:41
Absolutely terrible album. Complete anti-music and anti-art. If you're an anarchist I guess that's okay though.
-------------
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 17:57
To be honest I never liked anything the Sex Pistols did and this is no exception and I feel the same towards the Ramones. The regulars around here know I'm more into hardcore than the old straight up punk.
That said, I do respect their legacy and contribution to music because I strongly believe without bands like the Ramones and The Sex Pistols, many of my favorite bands simply wouldn't exist today.
Posted By: Lucent
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 18:08
The beginning of bad music started with Never Mind the Bollocks.
No.
Posted By: Pnoom!
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 18:11
Tales from Topographic Oceans came before Never Mind the Bollocks, get your history straight.
(In case it's not obvious: )
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 18:13
Lucent wrote:
The beginning of bad music started with Never Mind the Bollocks.
Gee, blanket statement, much? I guess if bad music started with Nevermind the Bollocks, it must mean everyone likes ice cream.
Posted By: Trademark
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 18:20
I never make blanket statements.
Posted By: Finnforest
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 18:20
I certainly had my days of enjoying it, but its not something I play anymore.
Posted By: moreitsythanyou
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 18:36
I truly do not enjoy any of their music. I hate the singles and would never listen to the album, or any by them.
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 18:55
To answer the OT question exactly - yes I enjoy it, the louder the better. But it was a terrible album then and it has not improved with age, however, Never Mind The Bollocks was never about "music"
------------- What?
Posted By: The Miracle
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 19:14
Always hated it, along with The Clash. Some of the most overrated garbage ever. In my opinion of course.
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 19:21
FWIW, I think I could only really appreciate what the Sex Pistols and The Ramones did for music when I truly researched it and looked at it in it's historical context (since I was unable to actually listen to it because I didn't like the music per se). I think it's worth looking up the history and historical context of those 2 bands, whether you're a fan of the music or not, because there is quite a lot to learn and understand.
Maybe not the best analogy, but it's like researching say, Nazi Germany even though you hate their regime but want to truly understand how it changed the future and the way we live, just as the Sex Pistols and The Ramones, like it or not, had a truly massive impact on the future of music, and you may hate it, but as I said, you will come out a more educated person on modern music history if you do your homework on them 2.
Posted By: zappaholic
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 19:31
Yeah, the Pistols were fabricated, but Never Mind is a fun little record.
------------- "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." -- H.L. Mencken
Posted By: jammun
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 22:41
Not sure I've ever heard it.
Posted By: BroSpence
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 23:34
Got it on vinyl and I love it. Its great. BODIESSSSSSSSSSSSS. What a nasty little song.
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: February 11 2009 at 23:57
Never Mind is a fun album, but I was always more into the California hardcore scene ie Black Flag, Dead Kennedys, Germs etc. (roots of thrash metal for you prog-metal fans).
I was still kind of young when punk hit and the shows were a total blast until everything became mundane and trendy.
For the record: punk didn't kill prog-rock, prog-rock killed itself. As a fan of prog from the late 60s, most of the original prog bands were putting out crap by the mid to late 70s.
Posted By: Pnoom!
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 00:01
Yeah, Black Flag, Dead Kennedys, and Germs are all great.
And you are absolutely right that punk didn't kill prog (though you're more qualified to say that than I, seeing as you lived back then).
Posted By: mithrandir
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 00:06
I don't care for the Pistols, but I love PiL,
Posted By: mystic fred
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 01:29
mithrandir wrote:
I don't care for the Pistols, but I love PiL,
i agree - John Lydon's material has matured a great deal by this point (PiL), surrounding himself with top notch musicians and even a few good songs and melodies, though the avant-garde leanings and sense of rebellion is still there, a very entertaining and solid album.
NMTB on the other hand is not about music, it is a reactive fashion statement, a right wing protest movement against the establishment, an antithesis not to Prog in particular but the whole misunderstood image of the directionless decadent music scene of 1977.
Though many have an affection for many of the bands during this period, i feel Punk Rock became an inevitable stain on our music history page - against the complacent moguls of the music world, things have hardly changed today in some areas, though many movers and shakers within the music world play very safe these days, sticking to clone acts who have a PA department to vet their activities when dealing with the press (boy band, girl band, girl with guitar, boy with guitar, all very safe and stuff you could listen to with granny around).
Even Rap has become a sanitised neatly packaged establishment institution , it is also about fashion statements not music, though its decadent anti-establishment overtones are all very tongue-in-cheek, and should only influence or offend the foolish .
With the lack of anything new appearing these days, music will to continue to safely go round in circles for many years to come.
------------- Prog Archives Tour Van
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 01:50
Easy Money wrote:
Never Mind is a fun album, but I was always more into the California hardcore scene ie Black Flag, Dead Kennedys, Germs etc. (roots of thrash metal for you prog-metal fans).
I was still kind of young when punk hit and the shows were a total blast until everything became mundane and trendy.
For the record: punk didn't kill prog-rock, prog-rock killed itself. As a fan of prog from the late 60s, most of the original prog bands were putting out crap by the mid to late 70s.
Yeah, I have a lot of respect for the early hardcore scene too, because as a PMT member, I absolutely love the 80s thrash metal that spawned partly from hardcore's influence. I've said it many times at PA too in the past, that punk never killed prog, because if it did, how would that explain why so many prog rock bands are influenced by punk? Bands from Tech/Extreme, Prog Metal, Post/Experimental, Heavy Prog, many of them are punk influenced, some to a very large degree like The Fall Of Troy which is essentially a post hardcore band at it's core, but moved into more complex writing styles. As far as I'm concerned, as you said, music scenes kill themselfs by putting out crap records and not delivering the goods, not anything to do with other music genres 'killing' them.
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 02:05
Punk gave us post-punk. :)
I don't form my opinions on punk music from listening to the records, thus I can confidently say it's better than anything Beethoven wrote.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
Posted By: Rocktopus
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 02:30
Logan wrote:
Incidentally, I like this album picks list that Johnny Rotten (John Lydon) came up with for an interview (before anyone brings up his "I hate Pink Floyd" shirt), which includes Bowie, Peter Hammill, Captain Beefheart, John Cale, Third Ear Band, and Can.
I've asked this before: Did he audition for Henry Cow, or have I just dreamt it ( I know he was a fan)?
And yes, I like Never Mind the Bollocks. The only pure punkalbum I've genuinely cared for. Haven't listened to it in years, though. John Lydon was brilliant, and artisically on a different level than the rest of the group. He proved that with PIL.
Never could stand The Ramones, and I don't consider them the same thing. If any punks destroyed music or whatever (which they didn't), it would have to be them. From that "school" I think The Misfits were great fun.
------------- Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Posted By: Trial and Error
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 03:28
I enjoy Punk and this album, but I feel too old and cynical for the whole rebellious stage, and the music itself certainly never was much to talk about. It's still a nice record, but it doesn't offer me anything at this point of my life.
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 07:30
I always liked it. I've read numerous critiques by idiot journalists who harp on about it's cultural significance, in a similar way they did over Nirvanas 'Nevermind' (which is clearly musically superior)
Lets not lose grip of the rope here; it's a ramshackle collection of simplistic rock 'n' roll songs, by a gang of virtually talentless kids. Lets take it for what it is; a bit of fun.
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 08:16
I only listened to it a few times, and thought it was ok. But that was some fifteen years ago, I haven't heard it since. I used to be more into The Exploited and The Toy Dolls, and a few Polish punk bands too. I can even remember some of the lyrics:
The autumn wind, The autumn wind, The autumn wind, The autumn wind, The autumn wind, The autumn wind, Blew the worker off the f**king roof, The autumn wind, The autumn wind, etc.
Praised be punk. You won't get such lyrics elsewhere.
Posted By: Pnoom!
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 08:28
mystic fred wrote:
Though many have an affection for many of the bands during this period, i feel Punk Rock became an inevitable stain on our music history page
This really only works if you hate all alternative/indie music, since a great deal of it is influenced by punk. Punk changed music, and vastly for the better.
Even Rap has become a sanitised neatly packaged establishment institution
Dalek, El-P, Wale, Binary Star, Cannibal Ox, Clipse, Deltron 3030, Edan, Madvillain, King Geedorah, Viktor Vaughn, Quasimoto, The Roots, etc, hardly qualify as part of a "sanitized neatly packaged establishment institution."
Even more mainstream artists like Eminem, Jay-Z, and Kanye West don't fit that bill.
it is also about fashion statements not music, though its decadent anti-establishment overtones are all very tongue-in-cheek, and should only influence or offend the foolish .
Are bands like Joy Division, Talking Heads, Sonic Youth, Pavement, Pixies, etc foolish for being influenced by it?
With the lack of anything new appearing these days, music will to continue to safely go round in circles for many years to come.
You're presupposing a lack of anything new. It seems to me that it's more a case of everyone having the resources to realize their own vision, so they don't have to latch onto someone else's.
Posted By: npjnpj
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 08:28
Dreadful, just dreadful!
I liked Megadeth's version of Anarchy in the UK though.
Posted By: Pnoom!
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 08:28
Also these results are really pleasantly surprising.
Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 08:46
Posted By: Dick Heath
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 11:29
Rocktopus wrote:
I've asked this before: Did he audition for Henry Cow, ?
Not really the answer but.... Alan Freeman co-author of the Krautrock book Crack in The Cosmic Egg, tells me Lyden auditioned for Can at one time and their lead vocalist position.
------------- The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php - http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php
Host by PA's Dick Heath.
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 11:35
Blacksword wrote:
I always liked it. I've read numerous critiques by idiot journalists who harp on about it's cultural significance, in a similar way they did over Nirvanas 'Nevermind' (which is clearly musically superior)
Lets not lose grip of the rope here; it's a ramshackle collection of simplistic rock 'n' roll songs, by a gang of virtually talentless kids. Lets take it for what it is; a bit of fun.
I think you've hit the nail firmly on the head there, Blacksword; to me (and I know many will disagree with me) The Sex Pistols were a 4th rate (bad) pub heavy metal band with a clever manager; NMTB was written, played & produced badly & to these ears had virtually no redeeming features whatsoever - especially when compared to debut albums by The Clash, The Stranglers, The Buzzcocks & even to an extent Souixie & The Banshees.
But that's probably just me...
-------------
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 11:37
Easy Money wrote:
For the record: punk didn't kill prog-rock.
It did not, but it made it a hell of lot more difficult to start a prog band circa 1977 than it was 6 or 7 years prior - the record companies wanted nothing to do with that kind of music. And really, prog was never even killed anyway as far as I'm concerned, it just went more underground and never regained the sort of commercial success it (i.e. the big name groups) enjoyed throughout most of the 1970s.
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 11:40
Prog never died... it just smelled funny for a couple of years +++coughlovebeachcough+++
-------------
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Posted By: The Miracle
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 11:58
Punk is quite combineable with prog and I don't hate it like I used to a long time ago but i just don't dig the Sex Pistols/Clash (they sound pretty similar to me) sound... I like some old hardcore punk like Minor Threat or Black Flag though. And Ramones are ok.
Posted By: Finnforest
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 12:12
The more I read about this, the more I want to hear SP again. I never shared their anger towards prog but I certainly share it towards the new cycle most days.
At the risk of repeating myself, check out Minutemen for one of the best punk bands of the old days.
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 12:16
NaturalScience wrote:
Easy Money wrote:
For the record: punk didn't kill prog-rock.
It did not, but it made it a hell of lot more difficult to start a prog band circa 1977 than it was 6 or 7 years prior - the record companies wanted nothing to do with that kind of music. And really, prog was never even killed anyway as far as I'm concerned, it just went more underground and never regained the sort of commercial success it (i.e. the big name groups) enjoyed throughout most of the 1970s.
Yeah, there is a lot of truth to that, but what I was trying to say was that all my old favorite bands began to loose their creative spark. I remember seeing ELP Works tour and just being disgusted, not because of the music but by the fact that they obviously didn't care anymore and were just going through the motions.
Same thing with Genesis after Hacket split. I had just seen them a year or two earlier with Bruford and they were incredible, but soon after that their shows were lifeless.
Fripp was the only old favorite that wasn't 'phoning it in'. Meanwhile I saw Black Flag at a small club and rock was alive and well again and very creative and energetic. It didn't hurt that Black Flag's music had obvious King Crimson, Deep Purple and Black Sabbath influences.
Anyway, I didn't mean to get off subject here, let's not have another boring debate about prog and punk, that has been done to death on this site many times.
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 12:19
^ at least no one's mentioned modern Punk.
------------- What?
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 12:22
^ modern punk eh ... I've been teaching some young teens how to play songs by Patent Pending, they are a funny band with a guy in a whale mascot costume on stage with them dancing around etc, sarcastic goofy teen humor like that still cracks me up.
Posted By: crimhead
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 13:58
Lucent wrote:
The beginning of bad music started with Never Mind the Bollocks.
No.
Some might say the same about Disco. I don't recall the Chicago White Sox having a Punk night where people brought their punk albums to be blown up.
To each there own. Punk has a place in music history much like Disco and Grunge.
Posted By: Cygnus X-2
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 14:12
At least Lydon appreciated Peter Hammill enough to name-check him, other than that I don't care for the Sex Pistols.
-------------
Posted By: Pnoom!
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 14:45
Finnforest wrote:
check out Minutemen for one of the best punk bands of the old days.
I made your text bigger because it's some of the best advice I've ever seen anyone give.
Everyone check out Minutemen. Specifically the album Double Nickels on the Dime. That album is just mindblowing.
Posted By: Jimbo
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 17:27
It's alright, although punk had much more to offer - like the aforementioned Minutemen as well as Gang of Four, Television etc. I suppose with those bands we're entering the post-punk realm though, which is a different beast altogether.
-------------
Posted By: Pnoom!
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 17:31
Post-punk is definitely my favorite side to punk music.
Posted By: tszirmay
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 17:37
Jim Garten wrote:
Prog never died... it just smelled funny for a couple of years +++coughlovebeachcough+++
Funny that a singer called FISH would lead the eventual renaissance , no!
------------- I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 18:58
mystic fred wrote:
mithrandir wrote:
I don't care for the Pistols, but I love PiL,
i agree - John Lydon's material has matured a great deal by this point (PiL), surrounding himself with top notch musicians and even a few good songs and melodies, though the avant-garde leanings and sense of rebellion is still there, a very entertaining and solid album.
NMTB on the other hand is not about music, it is a reactive fashion statement, a right wing protest movement against the establishment, an antithesis not to Prog in particular but the whole misunderstood image of the directionless decadent music scene of 1977.
Though many have an affection for many of the bands during this period, i feel Punk Rock became an inevitable stain on our music history page - against the complacent moguls of the music world, things have hardly changed today in some areas, though many movers and shakers within the music world play very safe these days, sticking to clone acts who have a PA department to vet their activities when dealing with the press (boy band, girl band, girl with guitar, boy with guitar, all very safe and stuff you could listen to with granny around).
Even Rap has become a sanitised neatly packaged establishment institution , it is also about fashion statements not music, though its decadent anti-establishment overtones are all very tongue-in-cheek, and should only influence or offend the foolish .
With the lack of anything new appearing these days, music will to continue to safely go round in circles for many years to come.
I shall add to/back up what Pnoom! said.
Why is Nevermind the Bullocks not about music? Why is it less about music than a prog rock album is, why is it less about music than a classical piece is, why is it less about music than a simple 3 chord Johnny Cash song is? A classical musician could easily say Elvis Presley and Johnny Cash is just about image and not about music, since it's all relatively simple stripped down songs and often both have been put in the media and shown to the world as something more about image than music.
As far as I can hear, NMTB has melody, harmony and rhythm. So tell me why it's not about music, if it has the common elements of what we regard as music and was printed to vinyl so people could LISTEN to it (key word, listen, because that's what you do with music, right?). Sure, perhaps the BAND was about an image to an extent, but the record is about music.
"I feel Punk Rock became an inevitable stain on our music history page" I feel Genesis and Yes left an inevitable stain on our music history page when they released pure garbage in the form of pop albums and in fact, looking around PA, I'd be inclined to think many would agree with me.
As a fan of music, as a Progressive Metal Team member and also as a fan of prog rock, I am proud to say I'm a fan of punk. As far as I'm concerned, and as Pnoom! said, punk changed music for the better, but I guess you have to be a fan of stuff like metal, hardcore and the indie scene, like I am to truly appreciate punk's massive positive contribution to music , otherwise you'll miss it entirely. The whole of Tech/Extreme wouldn't exist without punk, so lemme guess that you think Tech/Extreme is a 'stain on music history'? A lot of post rock and post metal is heavily influenced by hardcore/post hardcore, so I guess it's a 'stain on music history" too right? Bands like The Mars Volta and The Fall Of Troy which are included in the database in our very own PA are heavily influenced by post hardcore, The Fall of Troy in fact being a prime example of progressive post hardcore. THAT'S RIGHT, a prog punk band in essence. Whoever said punk and prog couldn't fit together was dead wrong.
Clone acts exist in every genre really, it's not a punk phenomenon. Anyone that thinks punk never progressed musically, clearly doesn't know the genre at all. Just like prog, like metal, like jazz, like classical, it spawned many any sub genres, some of which have produced very complex music with true virtuoso musicians. I can tell you now, a lot of punk bands play it anything but safe. I would hardly call the post hardcore/pysch/experimental prog stylings of The Mars Volta safe and easily digestable by the mass audience. As far as I'm concerned and can see, punk doesn't play it anymore safe or dangerous than prog rock.
Now, if I must make it clear, I'm more into post hardcore than any other punk sub genre, but I still have quite a decent knowledge of punk history from it's roots until today.
And as Pnoom! said, there is still plenty of rap that is down and dirty and doesn't go by the rules of the popular rap styles. I'm no expert on the field and I don't have the understanding of rap that Pnoom! or other PA members do, but I can tell you, if you take the 2 seconds extra that mainstream audiences don't do to look for something that is far removed from being sanitized and sugar coated, you will find something more extreme that is not compatible with mainstream listeners.
Posted By: mithrandir
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 19:32
HughesJB4 wrote:
Anyone that thinks punk never progressed musically, clearly doesn't know the genre at all. Just like prog, like metal, like jazz, like classical, it spawned many any sub genres, some of which have produced very complex music with true virtuoso musicians.
I tired to make that point a long time ago around here on some other thread, but it was like talking to a wall,
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 19:44
^ It's down to context - at the time of its release Steve is correct in saying that Never Mind The Bollocks, Here's The Sex Pistols was not about the music - at the time it would not have mattered what was on the record because the music simply wasn't the point of it - it was the energy, the anger, the frustration and, yes, the fashion, but also remember that by late '77 the Punk scene in the UK was practically over (76 was the year of Punk) - NMTBHTSP was release at the end of Punk, not the beginning - the Pistols split-up three months later - music was already moving on and all it took with it was the fashion and trendy ethos of Punk, but none of it's ideology, none of it's anger and very little of it's music - what followed was a watered-down second wave of Punk that quickly became radio-friendly New Wave - yet NMTBHTSP was the most anticipated release of '77 because of the controversy surrounding it, not because of what was on it, it was actually "old hat" by then - the people who bought it and listened to it couldn't have cared less whether it had 2 chords or 12 as long as you could gob and pogo along to it.
------------- What?
Posted By: Pnoom!
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 19:49
First of all, Hughes, excellent post.
Dean, you make some good points, but I disagree with "at the time it would not have mattered what was on the record." If it had not been so perfectly put together, with music just as visceral as the image it represented, it certainly wouldn't be as big as it is today (though perhaps it would've been just as big back then, I can't honestly claim to know).
Also, New Wave is awesome and I'm not sure how bands like Black Flag and Dead Kennedys (who came in the wake of the Sex Pistols) are in any way "watered down" (or any band in that scene).
Posted By: Pnoom!
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 19:50
Also, I recommended this to The Miracle via PM, but anyone who wants to hear just how forward thinking and progressive punk can get need only listen to:
Refused - The Shape of Punk to Come
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 20:05
As with Pnoom, The Shape of Punk to Come is one of my favorites. At The Drive In - Relationship of Command is equal in quality IMO as some of the best post hardcore ever produced. Very far removed from the 3 chord punk of old. For those not in the know, the vocalist Cedric Bixler-Zavala and guitarist Omar Rodriguez-Lopez from At The Drive In went on to form The Mars Volta, which is how you get the post hardcore link to The Mars Volta. Those two guys were fed up by the other musicians into ATDI not wanting to progress into further, more complex territory, which is partly how TMV came about, since they were free to take the base sound of post hardcore and take it in a new direction. The Fall Of Troy (on PA) use a similar approach, they use post hardcore as the base sound, more so than TMV and threw in technical musicianship, extended compositions and metal influences, while still remaining still very much post hardcore at the core. Protest The Hero (also on the PA database) also came from a very staunch post hardcore background, as evidence by their EP "A Calculated Use of Sound" which is pure post hardcore, and their debut album is the result of taking the base sound of post hardcore, putting the musicianship in serious virtuoso territory and mixng it up with a dose of various metals of genre.
To me, those 3 bands are to an extent, doing for post hardcore and it's evolution as a genre in the 00s that Drive Like Jehu, Fugazi, Refused and At The Drive In did for Post hardcore in the 90s, although of course those 3 bands I mentioned obviously mash up a lot more genres into their sound to make something a lot less 'pure post hardcore' than Drive Like Jehu or Fugazi et al.
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 20:48
In the mid 80s in San Francisco there was a post hardcore scene with a strong prog-rock influence, some of the bands included Victims Family, Crash n Burn, Hello Kitty on Ice, No Means No (from Canada), Slovenly (LA) Rhythm Pigs (Texas) as well as Nuerosis (on PA) and Faith No More.
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 20:58
Pnoom! wrote:
First of all, Hughes, excellent post.
Dean, you make some good points, but I disagree with "at the time it would not have mattered what was on the record." If it had not been so perfectly put together, with music just as visceral as the image it represented, it certainly wouldn't be as big as it is today (though perhaps it would've been just as big back then, I can't honestly claim to know).
Also, New Wave is awesome and I'm not sure how bands like Black Flag and Dead Kennedys (who came in the wake of the Sex Pistols) are in any way "watered down" (or any band in that scene).
I was 19 in 1976 and I was a Punk (all be it a fat Punk in full employment and a sizable Prog collection that I still played, all of which is an anachronism, but there you go), so I can only speak of my personal recollections from the time based on the UK scene (yeah, we listened to The Ramones, but they weren't as big over here as they like to think they were). Every kid who wanted to be a Punk praised The Pistols and The Clash, most of them without ever hearing a single note of their music, because you couldn't hear their music - you weren't allowed to - when they played my home-town I missed them because they had to sneak in under an assumed name (The Tax Exiles) because the local council had banned them as did The Dammed (who played as either The Banned or The Doomed or something similar) - those kids (myself included) would have bought it regardless of how "good" it was.
In some respects NMTBHTSP was too perfect, too well produced, (by then we got the joke - we actually didn't need MacLaren to spell it out for us in The Great Rock'n' Roll Swindle), in some respects it goes against the whole Do It Yourself idea of Punk in how manufactured and heavily produced it is. The Buzzcock's Spiral Scratch EP was more visceral and much less perfectly put together.
I don't think NMTBHTSP was so influential at the time - the Pistols undoubtably were, but the album was not - and I don't know whether it really is that influential now - I can think of far more influential albums from that time - bands like The Buzzcocks, Joy Division, The Fall, Siouxsie & The Banshees who were inspired by the Pistols were actually formed before its release and share none of it's musical style.
[The watered-down Punk I refer to were bands like the Adverts, Tenpole Tudor, The Lurkers, X-Ray Specs, Generation-X, The Cockney Rejects and to some extent Sham 69 - and I think those bands were a musical dead-end. The real inspirational pioneers of what we call New Wave and Post Punk (Wire, Banshees, Penetration, Gloria Mundi, Television, The Fall, The Pop Group, Magazine, Gang Of Four etc) were almost a parallel development that owed their formation to the Punk ideal, but not the music.]
------------- What?
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: February 12 2009 at 21:20
^ The Pistols and early punk were a hugely different thing in the UK than in the US.
Punk was never a social movement or very visable trend in the US except in a few big cities. In the US, The Pistols were mostly a curiosity with only a few hipster college students getting into what they were doing.
Posted By: mithrandir
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 00:12
Easy Money wrote:
In the mid 80s in San Francisco there was a post hardcore scene with a strong prog-rock influence, some of the bands included Victims Family, Crash n Burn, Hello Kitty on Ice, No Means No (from Canada), Slovenly (LA) Rhythm Pigs (Texas) as well as Nuerosis (on PA) and Faith No More.
I love Victims Family! they had such an out of control rhythm section, their first 2 albums are some of my all time favorites, and of course NoMeansNo are absolute legends!
Posted By: npjnpj
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 03:17
I've always had this feeling that Punk was completely fabricated as a direct result of the failure of The Wombles to conquer the world.
It was perceived as a protest movement of the so-called young no-future generation (now bankers and stockbrokers). I believe that it started spontaneously and just two weeks later it was purely Product (capital 'P'), with the cleverest marketing you're likely to see, and practically everyone was fooled by it. Malcolm McLaren anyone?
Pure lifestyle fashion, no substance. Mainly middle class kids playing at being poor.
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 07:03
npjnpj wrote:
Pure lifestyle fashion, no substance. Mainly middle class kids playing at being poor.
The best parody of which could be seen as 'Common People' by Pulp; a long time later, but none the less incisive.
-------------
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 09:44
Jim Garten wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
I always liked it. I've read numerous critiques by idiot journalists who harp on about it's cultural significance, in a similar way they did over Nirvanas 'Nevermind' (which is clearly musically superior)
Lets not lose grip of the rope here; it's a ramshackle collection of simplistic rock 'n' roll songs, by a gang of virtually talentless kids. Lets take it for what it is; a bit of fun.
I think you've hit the nail firmly on the head there, Blacksword; to me (and I know many will disagree with me) The Sex Pistols were a 4th rate (bad) pub heavy metal band with a clever manager; NMTB was written, played & produced badly & to these ears had virtually no redeeming features whatsoever - especially when compared to debut albums by The Clash, The Stranglers, The Buzzcocks & even to an extent Souixie & The Banshees.
But that's probably just me...
Agreed. The Pistols were probably the worst punk band, to have ever made a name for themselves, but they probably captured, what we believed to be, the punk spirit in the UK, at the time. The Clash were not particularly offensive, nor were Souixsie & the banshees. The Stranglers (not punk, but hey lets not open that can of worms) were pretty obnoxious, but were too 'clever' and poetic to be punk! Same goes for Killing Joke a few years later.
The Pistols were crass and crap through and through, and lived up to McLarens philosophy that a band that cant play, is better than a band that can. But then, old Malcolm was always something of a d!ck.
I have no problem with punk generally. There is a lot of punk I'm quite partial to, even now, but I just cant stand middle class, middle aged music critics in hemp shirts and John Lennon glasses, harping on about it's cultural significance or artistic worth. It was mostly sh*t. Get over it.
Posted By: jimidom
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 09:52
To be quite frank, either the Stooges or the Ramones would have very easily blown the Sex Pistols off the stage. Still, Never Mind the Bullocks does have its moments. "Pretty Vacant" is one of my favorite punk songs.
------------- "The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." - HST
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 10:36
^^ Indeed. I always regarded punk as a US invention. It only became synonomous with England (mostly London) because of the Vivien Westwood fashions that accompanied the Sex Pistols, and of course the classic British moral outrage, that the middle classes displayed in reaction to it.IMO.
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 10:57
Never got into The Stooges, but The Ramones were a pure force of nature; total wall of sound
It could be said it went back even further with bands such as the New York Dolls or even Alice Cooper (often referred to as the grandfather of punk).
As I saw it (even though I liked a lot of the bands), Punk in Britain was more to do with fashion than music
-------------
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 11:02
Belson Was A Gas.Sid Vicious couldn`t even play the bass or even sing My Way ( although that was him solo.) But you gotta love `em. I also have an old copy of The great Rock `n Roll Swindle. Love the versions of Johnny B. Goode and Road Runner. Lydon forgets the words and even anounces how much he hates the songs and Sreve Jones doesn`t even know what song they`re supposed to be playing and everything just goes to rats***. C`mon this stuff is just too funny. Remember when Sid Vicious died I was playing a hockey game in February `79 when he od`d on heroin. I think he just came out of a 60 day forced rehab program.
-------------
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 11:18
^ (pointing towards Jim's post) Yeah, that is what I have been trying to say. It was more about fashion in the UK and Europe, but the bands that emerged from the California and Boston/D.C. hard core scene had much better instrumental skills. Bad Brains had one of the best drummers I have ever heard.
Posted By: Pnoom!
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 11:23
npjnpj wrote:
It was perceived as a protest movement of the so-called young no-future generation (now bankers and stockbrokers).
Right, so no future still applies.
Posted By: Syzygy
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 11:24
Yes. I think it's a massively overrated album, but about half of the songs are genuine classics of their genre (Anarchy, Pretty Vacant, Holidays in the Sun, God Save The Queen, Submission, No Feelings) and its influence on popular culture was massive. John Lydon went on to do some pretty cool stuff with PIL as well. My one and only karaoke performance was singing Anarchy in the UK in a japanese karaoke bar many years ago.
------------- 'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute
to the already rich among us...'
Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 12:47
Jim Garten wrote:
Never got into The Stooges, but The Ramones were a pure force of nature; total wall of sound
It could be said it went back even further with bands such as the New York Dolls or even Alice Cooper (often referred to as the grandfather of punk).
As I saw it (even though I liked a lot of the bands), Punk in Britain was more to do with fashion than music
You could probably take it further back to the MC5's Kick Out The Jams, and even the name Punk was of American derivation. Most London Punk bands came out of the Pub Rock scene.
------------- What?
Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 12:59
Yeah!!! MC5 and Kick Out the Jams. I confiscated my dad's LP from him many years ago. It is actually hard for me to picture my dad actually liking this music.
-------------
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 13:03
i've never paid no mind to the bullocks, I did like PIL's Compact Disc, which I tried last year. Album, Cassette, 8-Track, and Wax Cylinder were bloody awful though.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 13:09
I wonder if Punk Archives have this level of discussion over Tales From Topographic Oceans?
------------- What?
Posted By: Vompatti
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 13:17
I don't think I've ever heard NMtB. But the picture on the cover of The Flowers of Romance must be one of the prettiest things ever.
Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 14:29
For a lot of you guys who hate punk I don`t know? this thread has gone some 4 pages on a progrock site whereas I`ve seen a few threads about prog bands die out after maybe 10-15 posts, Suprised no none has mentioned the Exploited or Canadian band DOA who do a killer version of BTO`s Takin`Care Of Business. I agree with the guys who have mentioned PIL got a couple of their albums as well myself.
I was just comparing ACDC`s version of Johnny B Goode to the Sex Pistols "version" and I find the Sex Pistol`s "version" far more entertaining. I saw Joey Ramone ( RIP ) getting tattooed in a Calgary tattooo shop once when I was witha friend who was checking out tatoos and said hello to him. I don`t care what anyone says the Ramones were the first punk band. Wasn`t the Brits. They were formed in Queeens NY in `74 and went for at least 20 years. Love their versions of Spider Man and Louis Armstrong`s Wonderful World ( it can be heard over the closing credits on Michael Moore`s Bowling For Columbine ) and of course I Don`t Want to Grow Up. So it at least proves that the punks were clued into other styles of music to an extent.
If you want to get down to it The Who were the first real punk band.Really think about it. If you wanto look at it that way then I guess the Brits invented Punk,
I saw John Lydon defending himself on Judge Judy once. Apparantly Lydon fired his drummer in and assaulted him.. He kept interrupting Judge Judy she had to threaten to throw him out of the courtroom about 6 or 7 times. People in the court were even laughing. I was laaughing my ass off as welI think it had something to do witha breach of a verbal contract. Judge Judy ruled in favour of Lydon. In the interview at the end Lydon said that the plainif would have been better off as an interior decorator.
One other thing that I don`t understand is this term " prog community " it`s a made-up term. I`ll speak for myself here. I always considered myself a MUSIC fan. If fact right now I`m jamming with a metal band every time we get the chance to get away from our wives.
Now, I don`t mean ti insult or offendanyone here. There`s a prog festival here in Montréal I think every year ( The Strawbs played a couple of years back , one of my favourite bands of all time )which is set up just to generate $$$$$$$$ which I adamantly boycott along with the Montréal International Jazz Festival.which I religiosly attended every year until they started selling bottles of water for $4.50 and a beer for $6.75 and your bags checked at the entrances to the venue which now takes place at place des Arts. They used to have it on Rue St. Denis Believe me I`d have rather gone to see The Exploited. At least the punks and metal heads are honest, at least the ones I`ve met. I just don`t know why some people don`t have open minds anymore and are soooooo serious about things. A sign of the times I guess. C`mon Duke let`s go out on to the porch to the rocking chair and watch the sun go down.
-------------
Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 14:40
Jim Garten wrote:
Never got into The Stooges, but The Ramones were a pure force of nature; total wall of sound
It could be said it went back even further with bands such as the New York Dolls or even Alice Cooper (often referred to as the grandfather of punk).
As I saw it (even though I liked a lot of the bands), Punk in Britain was more to do with fashion than music
I would have to say that Alice Cooper would be more acuarately called the grandfather of shock rock. Punk? Like to hear what he would have to say about that. I would say The New York Dolls would be better classified as glam rockers taking cues from Bowie and Gary Glitter ( who found himself in a wee bit of trouble in Vietnam of all places ).
-------------
Posted By: Trademark
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 18:27
The Dolls were an absolute laugh riot. Loved 'em dearly, though no, I never really thought of them as punk. Sylvain's riffs were top notch. Has anyone seen the video on Arthur Kane called "New York Doll?" I may have actually strapped on my roller skates and cried a bit after that one.
Posted By: debrewguy
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 18:31
Funny how none of the Ramones albums ever became big sellers. My opinion - mostly because of the filler that was on each one of them , including the first four classics. The Sex Pistols, from one true albm - the Bollocks, manage 4 classic songs - Holiday in the Sun, Pretty Vacant, Anarchy in the U.K., and God Save the Queen. Rotten never hid his opinion that punk was not about uniforms or haircuts. And he was quite blunt about Malcolm's machinations. Top that off with this - what other punk got his knee slashed and was attacked, picked up by the police and charge with assault ? The PIstols took the crap for the rest. The Ramones were there first, The Clash were the ones to show what punk didn't have to be, but the Pistols were the face of Punk. And that they can still manage to grab a sackful of money for reunion tours speaks to their enduring legacy when the Ramones had to did relentlessly just to pay bills.
------------- "Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Posted By: Mikerinos
Date Posted: February 13 2009 at 22:37
I don't have the whole album, but I like The Sex Pistols from what I've heard, so I'm sure I'd like that album. I really like John Lydon's later band, Public Image Ltd. too.
-------------
Posted By: WalterDigsTunes
Date Posted: February 22 2009 at 21:09
Raucous rock and roll. A solid 12 track LP, featuring a charming young Lydon on vocals and Steve Jones providing some catchy riffs on the six-string. A bit overproduced for a 'punk' album, if you stop and think about it. Still, it works. Couldn't think of a world without most of these tracks. I like it.
Posted By: Captain Capricorn
Date Posted: February 22 2009 at 21:13
There wasn't much I liked about the British punk scene - or the American one for that matter...but I do enjoy giving Television's Marquee Moon a spin from time to time
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: February 23 2009 at 07:11
Dean wrote:
Jim Garten wrote:
Never got into The Stooges, but The Ramones were a pure force of nature; total wall of sound It could be said it went back even further with bands such as the New York Dolls or even Alice Cooper (often referred to as the grandfather of punk)
You could probably take it further back to the MC5's Kick Out The Jams
There's an album I've not played for a while - Ramblin' Rose, proto punk if ever I heard it.
-------------
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Posted By: someone_else
Date Posted: February 23 2009 at 07:15
No, there are worse albums, but I don't like it any more than Nevermind.
Posted By: Philéas
Date Posted: February 23 2009 at 16:53
Nope. There has been a lot more interesting things done within the punk genre.
Posted By: Zargus
Date Posted: February 25 2009 at 06:20
Nope it only got like 3-4 good songs the rest is boring filler its one of this albums i bought becaus its a classic but was very let down by, Public Image Ltd was much beter and intresting band, the Stooges, Clash and Ramones where much beter real punk bands then the sex pistols.