John Petrucci iz Da Shiz.
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
Forum Description: Discuss specific prog bands and their members or a specific sub-genre
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=54271
Printed Date: November 28 2024 at 08:34 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: John Petrucci iz Da Shiz.
Posted By: PetrucciPal
Subject: John Petrucci iz Da Shiz.
Date Posted: December 24 2008 at 14:08
OK! So. A little while back I was learning how to "play like John Petrucci" out of his Wild Stringdom book...and there's some things that I get, and some things that I try asking my dad what it means and he's even like, "wtf." lol
Petrucci, like most guitarists into prog rock, loves the technicality of the music. Unlike most guitarists, Johnny loves playing technically- but he makes it sound right. Sometimes, maybe there's a few riffs in a song where he's like, "Ehh, I'm bored." and he just throws it in because it fits. Hey, I don't blame him, I'd do the exact same thing probably. Only not as godly. Haha ^_~
OK, well I'm bored of this.
------------- For the <3 of John Petrucci!
|
Replies:
Posted By: Kestrel
Date Posted: December 24 2008 at 14:48
As I saw in someone's signature once: Gilmour gets more emotion out of a single note bend than Petrucci does in a whole guitar solo.
|
Posted By: Queen By-Tor
Date Posted: December 24 2008 at 15:13
Posted By: andYouandI45
Date Posted: December 24 2008 at 16:01
i notice that with alot of vituoso guitarists. They're really good, but that's the only thing that really keeps your attention is that fact that they're awesome players, it's hard to find ones that can actually play an interesting solo, without it being just technical.
That's way Zappa is awesome. Not only are his solo interesting, but they're technical as well.
Champion of the prog-rock guitar solo?
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
|
Posted By: timothy leary
Date Posted: December 24 2008 at 19:20
why settle for petrucci when you can listen to his idol, Steve Morse, 5 time winner in a row of the guitarist of the year, not allowed in the contest anymore
|
Posted By: JayDee
Date Posted: December 24 2008 at 20:29
Because John Petrucci is different from Steve Morse and vice versa.
-------------
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: December 24 2008 at 20:31
Um....This thread should have been locked instead of moved. That's all I have to say.
oh ps fred frith 4 lyfe!!!
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: Failcore
Date Posted: December 24 2008 at 21:34
timothy leary wrote:
why settle for petrucci when you can listen to his idol, Steve Morse, 5 time winner in a row of the guitarist of the year, not allowed in the contest anymore
|
This.
|
Posted By: andYouandI45
Date Posted: December 24 2008 at 22:52
Nice Blago signature hahahha
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: December 24 2008 at 22:53
Depends on what you mean by Da Shiz. What i look for in a guitarist is emotion, composition, and originality. Technicality is interesting for the OMG WTF effect on a youtube video, but in a song it is only a means to an end, not something to be desired itself.
Petrucci wouldn't crack my top 20 guitarists, my top 200 if we include only current material.
What I'm trying to say is listen to some Fripp/Frith.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: prog4evr
Date Posted: December 24 2008 at 23:45
Kestrel wrote:
As I saw in someone's signature once: Gilmour gets more emotion out of a single note bend than Petrucci does in a whole guitar solo. |
Good call! And "Comfortably Numb" is the reason why...
|
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 03:42
This what appeared to be an appreciation thread failed as soon as it got it's second post in here Seriously guys, he obviously hasn't made this thread for people to come in and bash Petrucci, show the OP some respect.
-------------
|
Posted By: cobb2
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 03:50
Why compare two different guitar styles- Gilmour has a very distinctive- almost human voice quality to his soloing. But don't just say Petrucci is only technical- that just seems to show that all the negative posters here have never actually listened to dream theater. The spirit carries on brought spontaneous tears to my eyes, the first time I heard it, and that was a live recording. Gilmour has never done that to me.
|
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 03:53
The Spirit Carries On guitar solo is among the best solos in Petrucci's career, and one of the better solos in prog too. Memorable without being over the top, and brings a tear to my eye each time.
-------------
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 04:08
HughesJB4 wrote:
Seriously guys, he obviously hasn't made this thread for people to come in and bash Petrucci, show the OP some respect.
|
Yes, but it's also hard to tell what he did make it for. ;-)
I always thought Comfortably Numb was super overrated, especially compared to everything else Gilmour did before that.
Oh wait, on topic (I'm just going to guess what the topic is?). I kind of liked LTE 2, but I haven't listened to it in forever because I didn't like it that much.
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: Djm912
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 08:31
I don't understand why every guitarist that happens to be in a heavier band that might play a solo that may have a few more notes always gets called an Malmsteen-esque automaton.
As if The Spirit Carries on and Repetance don't exist at all.......
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 10:01
cobb2 wrote:
Why compare two different guitar styles- Gilmour has a very distinctive- almost human voice quality to his soloing. But don't just say Petrucci is only technical- that just seems to show that all the negative posters here have never actually listened to dream theater. The spirit carries on brought spontaneous tears to my eyes, the first time I heard it, and that was a live recording. Gilmour has never done that to me. |
Yes I've obviously never listened to Dream Theater, because if I had there's no way I could have a negative opinion of any aspect of the band.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 10:13
Also his solo in Voices is much more emotional than anything he ever did before or after.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 10:35
PetrucciPal wrote:
OK! So. A little while back I was learning how to "play like John Petrucci" out of his Wild Stringdom book...and there's some things that I get, and some things that I try asking my dad what it means and he's even like, "wtf." lol
Petrucci, like most guitarists into prog rock, loves the technicality of the music. Unlike most guitarists, Johnny loves playing technically- but he makes it sound right. Sometimes, maybe there's a few riffs in a song where he's like, "Ehh, I'm bored." and he just throws it in because it fits. Hey, I don't blame him, I'd do the exact same thing probably. Only not as godly. Haha ^_~
OK, well I'm bored of this. |
I'm sorry, but I just can't agree with this. If music isx actual art (which I happen to believe that it is) then all of the ingrediants must be there to serve the piece, and not show off the artists's abilities. That's just pompous and self-indlugent.
And as for making the technical playing sound 'right' as you say, well . . . You've obviousely been listening to a very different Dream Theater than I have.
Don't get me wrong, Petrucci's great, but he isn't a very good melody maker. He's more of a sports player. He looks at his instrument like it's a way to train agility and endurance, when he should be looking at it as a tool for getting what is in your soul musically out into the world. Hell, even when he covers Gilmour he can't resists butchering the solos all to hell by playing overly technical variations. Wtahc DT's DSotM to see what I mean. The man cannot play slow for very long at all.
|
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 10:37
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
Also his solo in Voices is much more emotional than anything he ever did before or after. |
++++++++++!
And guess what? That was the only solo John improvised in the studio. He actually played what he felt at the time. Proof that playing what you feel is much better than playing what looks technically adept on paper.
|
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 10:48
cobb2 wrote:
Why compare two different guitar styles- Gilmour has a very distinctive- almost human voice quality to his soloing. But don't just say Petrucci is only technical- that just seems to show that all the negative posters here have never actually listened to dream theater. The spirit carries on brought spontaneous tears to my eyes, the first time I heard it, and that was a live recording. Gilmour has never done that to me. |
"The Spirit Carries On" is a beautiful song, but it is full or blatant rip-offs from past bands. LaBrie is singing style is straight out of The Wall, Waters-style. The guitar solo at the end is ripping off the solo from Marillion's "Sugarmice".
And you're using that song as an example of DT's originality? I would say mostly anyhing off of Images and Words or Awake would be much better examples than Spirit. Just my opinion.
Petrucci used to play really beautiful melodies, but anymore he seems to always need to shred in order to feel like he's making an adequate song. When a musician gets in that mindset, it's hard to take them seriousely as an artist. True artists know when to play alot and when to play a little. The styles can work either way, but you have to know when the appropriate time arrives. If you w**k all over what could potentially be a beautiful song simply to remind yourself that you're a master guitarist, then what is the point?
Having said this, I am quite fond of Dream Theater, but anyone who thinks they are the first of their kind or revolutionary in any way needs to dig much deeper into the Archives here. Just my opinion. They are good, but not original. That's my story, and I'm stickin' to it.
|
Posted By: Philéas
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 14:24
Kestrel wrote:
As I saw in someone's signature once: Gilmour gets more emotion out of a single note bend than Petrucci does in a whole guitar solo. |
That's bull, sorry. It's just not true at all.
And I don't even like Dream Theater. But I believe in giving credit where credit is due. Petrucci's playing can be very emotional too.
Having said that, this thread is utterly unnecessary. Lock and hide.
|
Posted By: cobb2
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 17:13
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
cobb2 wrote:
Why compare two different guitar styles- Gilmour has a very distinctive- almost human voice quality to his soloing. But don't just say Petrucci is only technical- that just seems to show that all the negative posters here have never actually listened to dream theater. The spirit carries on brought spontaneous tears to my eyes, the first time I heard it, and that was a live recording. Gilmour has never done that to me. |
Yes I've obviously never listened to Dream Theater, because if I had there's no way I could have a negative opinion of any aspect of the band. |
Yes, I agree- that was rather rude and assumptive of me... and for that I apologise.
|
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 17:49
^cobb, I definately understand where you are cominf from, though.
Like I say, I enjoy Dream Theater, and alot of times it feels like people on this site can either praise them as if they are almighty, or crap on them like they are the worst ban d to ever garce these pages. Neither of which of course is true.
Truth is . . . I think "Images and Words" was one of the greatest Prog Metal records ever made. "Awake" took the band's diversity even further, and "Falling Into Infinity" was the band's Crossover record, if you will. "Metropolis Pt. 2" would be the last DT album to have complete substance, in my opinion,l and even then, I can here much more ripped-off material on that record than any of the band's previous.
My criticism of JP's playing isn't because I think I can do any better (He's clearly one of the best guitar players of all time in terms of technicallity), all I am saying is that the man has the potential to write some really killer tunes, and instead usually just turns to unnecessary w**kery in place of emotional playing. Those instances have increased more and more over time, and I don't know why he feels that every song has to be a technical masterpiece.
I don't dislike the band, and I think Equality is in pretty much the same mindset as myself in that we know Petrucci can do better, yet he chooses to show off more often than not these days. It's a bit heartbreaking. :(
|
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 19:35
The discussion on Spirit Carries On reminds me of how one Dream Theater fan would lampoon Gilmour's style because he only played slow solos and sustained long notes all the time instead of some "actual" playing. I never asked him but I am sure he would consider Spirit Carries On divine and emotional, nevermind how Gilmour-like it sounds (except for towards the end, where he shreds for a bit)! That's the point, it's not really that Petrucci's playing is all cold and technical and shred-oriented, he can play good emotional solos, the point is how much he's talked up by the fans. But as for that, well, I wouldn't know how much Floydians talked up Gilmour in the 70s, they still do sometimes sound as if he was the ONLY emotional soloist in prog. Fanboys will be fanboys. But let me just say that I would turn to a Dream Theater song for emotional guitar, not because Petrucci cannot play emotionally, but because others have done it better, just my opinion. I don't think Hackett would find some of the shredding on Train of Thought to his liking, but I don't think Petrucci can write something simple but magnificent and majestic like Shadow of the Hierophant either.
|
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 20:16
Well I only just realized this thread was not originally in the Appreciation section, so my bad if I sounded a bit harsh earlier
Well, as much as I think The Spirit Carries on is a great song and has one of Petrucci's finest solos, p0mt3 is right in that the song is pretty unoriginal really, and honestly, that song lets down the album a bit, and overall I think I&W is a superior album to SFAM anyway. If I must be honest as well, I don't like Octavarium much at all, I skip past about half of the tracks on FII and same for Systematic Chaos. Quite frankly, I've gotten sick of Petrucci and Rudess' 'widdly wee' solos and want to well.........hear them actually put their musical training to maximum use. These guys have a whole head full of orchestration knowledge and could create some pretty immense music, but they just don't and honestly now, I don't have much hope for any future studio releases from the band.
My other complaint with Petrucci, is his leads just don't sound all that unique. What I mean really, is that I can hear guys like Joe Satriani, Steve Vai, Guthrie Govan, Steve Hackett, Marty Friedman, and within a few phrases, I can tell it's them, because these guys all have such a unique voice on the guitar and have signature phrasing. Whereas, if I just turned on a radio and heard a Petrucci solo, I might not know it until a radio announcer at the end told it was Petrucci, because I've never been able to really hear much uniqueness in his leads. I mean sure enough, when watching the G3 Live In Tokyo DVD, during the jam you can tell when it's Petrucci, but outside that kinda of environment playing with other guitarists, when he's playing as a lone guitarist, his style doesn't have any real phrasing that makes me think "Oh, that's Petrucci". And because of that, he doesn't even get into my top 20 guitarists really.
As for his chops, I think of about 100 guys off the top of my head that can easily outstrip him technically. Shawn Lane comes to mind (the guy could do things in legato, alternate and sweep picking Petrucci can't even get close to), and Lane was a master of emotion too IMO.
But it must be said, being able to combine incredible rhythm guitar prowess with ferocious technical lead playing is a pretty amazing. He has the rhythm guitar capabilities of James Hetfield on metal riffage times 5, and add to the fact he can do it while crossing an array of dizzying time signature and tempo changes, his rhythm playing is a feat to behold. And Petrucci is always gonna be an influence of mine, and to some extent a guitar hero to me too.
-------------
|
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 20:33
HughesJB4 wrote:
Well I only just realized this thread was not originally in the Appreciation section, so my bad if I sounded a bit harsh earlier
Well, as much as I think The Spirit Carries on is a great song and has one of Petrucci's finest solos, p0mt3 is right in that the song is pretty unoriginal really, and honestly, that song lets down the album a bit, and overall I think I&W is a superior album to SFAM anyway. If I must be honest as well, I don't like Octavarium much at all, I skip past about half of the tracks on FII and same for Systematic Chaos. Quite frankly, I've gotten sick of Petrucci and Rudess' 'widdly wee' solos and want to well.........hear them actually put their musical training to maximum use. These guys have a whole head full of orchestration knowledge and could create some pretty immense music, but they just don't and honestly now, I don't have much hope for any future studio releases from the band.
My other complaint with Petrucci, is his leads just don't sound all that unique. What I mean really, is that I can hear guys like Joe Satriani, Steve Vai, Guthrie Govan, Steve Hackett, Marty Friedman, and within a few phrases, I can tell it's them, because these guys all have such a unique voice on the guitar and have signature phrasing. Whereas, if I just turned on a radio and heard a Petrucci solo, I might not know it until a radio announcer at the end told it was Petrucci, because I've never been able to really hear much uniqueness in his leads. I mean sure enough, when watching the G3 Live In Tokyo DVD, during the jam you can tell when it's Petrucci, but outside that kinda of environment playing with other guitarists, when he's playing as a lone guitarist, his style doesn't have any real phrasing that makes me think "Oh, that's Petrucci". And because of that, he doesn't even get into my top 20 guitarists really.
As for his chops, I think of about 100 guys off the top of my head that can easily outstrip him technically. Shawn Lane comes to mind (the guy could do things in legato, alternate and sweep picking Petrucci can't even get close to), and Lane was a master of emotion too IMO.
But it must be said, being able to combine incredible rhythm guitar prowess with ferocious technical lead playing is a pretty amazing. He has the rhythm guitar capabilities of James Hetfield on metal riffage times 5, and add to the fact he can do it while crossing an array of dizzying time signature and tempo changes, his rhythm playing is a feat to behold. And Petrucci is always gonna be an influence of mine, and to some extent a guitar hero to me too.
|
Well said, my friend.
Sometimes I fear that my complaints against Petrucci sound way harsher than I intend them to, so in the long run my feelings about him are pretty divided, but I certainly don't hate the guy. In fact, I admire him ni alot of ways. It's very difficult to explain my opinion of him without sounding contradictory, but hopefully you know what I mean.
|
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 20:54
HughesJB4 wrote:
My other complaint with Petrucci, is his leads just don't sound all that unique. What I mean really, is that I can hear guys like Joe Satriani, Steve Vai, Guthrie Govan, Steve Hackett, Marty Friedman, and within a few phrases, I can tell it's them, because these guys all have such a unique voice on the guitar and have signature phrasing.
|
Thank you, I have said the same thing to budding guitarists and Dream Theater fans and they disagreed vehemently and put it down to my not being a guitarist and of course I couldn't argue with that. Now I know I was not entirely off the mark.
|
Posted By: burritounit
Date Posted: December 25 2008 at 21:57
Reading this thread made me listen to Dream Theater again.
------------- "I've walked on water, run through fire, can't seem to feel it anymore. It was me, waiting for me..."
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: December 26 2008 at 10:49
p0mt3 wrote:
^cobb, I definately understand where you are cominf from, though.
Like I say, I enjoy Dream Theater, and alot of times it feels like people on this site can either praise them as if they are almighty, or crap on them like they are the worst ban d to ever garce these pages. Neither of which of course is true.
Truth is . . . I think "Images and Words" was one of the greatest Prog Metal records ever made. "Awake" took the band's diversity even further, and "Falling Into Infinity" was the band's Crossover record, if you will. "Metropolis Pt. 2" would be the last DT album to have complete substance, in my opinion,l and even then, I can here much more ripped-off material on that record than any of the band's previous.
My criticism of JP's playing isn't because I think I can do any better (He's clearly one of the best guitar players of all time in terms of technicallity), all I am saying is that the man has the potential to write some really killer tunes, and instead usually just turns to unnecessary w**kery in place of emotional playing. Those instances have increased more and more over time, and I don't know why he feels that every song has to be a technical masterpiece.
I don't dislike the band, and I think Equality is in pretty much the same mindset as myself in that we know Petrucci can do better, yet he chooses to show off more often than not these days. It's a bit heartbreaking. :( |
Exactly how I feel. I would say Awake may be the greatest Prog Metal album ever made. WDaDU is one of my favorites too despite that its a bit derivative.
And thanks cobb no hard feelings. It just frustrating that whenever you seem to criticize DT a firestorm comes down. I used to post at a DT forum and I was told I'm not a real fan because I didn't like anything after SFaM, despite me owning everything the band's ever released. I ended up getting banned actually because I said Chroma Key's DAfR is as good as or better than every DT album barring Awake.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: December 26 2008 at 10:54
HughesJB4 wrote:
But it must be said, being able to combine incredible rhythm guitar prowess with ferocious technical lead playing is a pretty amazing. He has the rhythm guitar capabilities of James Hetfield on metal riffage times 5, and add to the fact he can do it while crossing an array of dizzying time signature and tempo changes, his rhythm playing is a feat to behold. |
I would say Hetfield has a step over him, but this is a very good point. It's his main job in the band and I think a lot of recent work suffers because he inundates it with solos and neglects the quality of his riffs.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: PetrucciPal
Date Posted: December 26 2008 at 11:07
Djm912 wrote:
I don't understand why every guitarist that happens to be in a heavier band that might play a solo that may have a few more notes always gets called an Malmsteen-esque automaton.
As if The Spirit Carries on and Repetance don't exist at all.......
|
Exactly! The Repentance solo, along with solos in songs such as Under a Glass Moon, Forsaken, and In the Name of God are freaking AMAZING!!!! Yet people think that they suck just because they're played in 32nd notes rather than quarter notes. lol
------------- For the <3 of John Petrucci!
|
Posted By: topofsm
Date Posted: December 26 2008 at 14:09
I have to say that I think my favorite Petrucci solo is probably in "Stream of Consciousness" starting around the 3:50 mark. For such a blisteringly fast solo, in my opinion it's very well written. Most Petrucci(and metal in general) solos are bits of flurries of notes in the same key thrown together so it's just a mishmash of a few quick phrases. However, "Stream of Consciousness" is rather consistent, and I enjoy it very much.
Does anybody else agree with me?
-------------
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: December 26 2008 at 14:31
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
HughesJB4 wrote:
But it must be said, being able to combine incredible rhythm guitar prowess with ferocious technical lead playing is a pretty amazing. He has the rhythm guitar capabilities of James Hetfield on metal riffage times 5, and add to the fact he can do it while crossing an array of dizzying time signature and tempo changes, his rhythm playing is a feat to behold. |
I would say Hetfield has a step over him, but this is a very good point. It's his main job in the band and I think a lot of recent work suffers because he inundates it with solos and neglects the quality of his riffs. |
I think this is a good point. I personally love Petrucci's work but can't deny that his most glorious soloing-days are past him. The burden of having to carry both ends of the guitar spectrum (riffing+soloing) in a style of music that in theory should demand high quality of both has taken a toll lately. That's why, until SC, all DT albums since SFAM were just good for me. The fantastic solos of Awajke or SFAM or I&W or even FII (Lines in the sand) are not so recurrent now...
-------------
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: December 26 2008 at 14:40
The T wrote:
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
HughesJB4 wrote:
But it must be said, being able to combine incredible rhythm guitar prowess with ferocious technical lead playing is a pretty amazing. He has the rhythm guitar capabilities of James Hetfield on metal riffage times 5, and add to the fact he can do it while crossing an array of dizzying time signature and tempo changes, his rhythm playing is a feat to behold. |
I would say Hetfield has a step over him, but this is a very good point. It's his main job in the band and I think a lot of recent work suffers because he inundates it with solos and neglects the quality of his riffs. |
I think this is a good point. I personally love Petrucci's work but can't deny that his most glorious soloing-days are past him. The burden of having to carry both ends of the guitar spectrum (riffing+soloing) in a style of music that in theory should demand high quality of both has taken a toll lately. That's why, until SC, all DT albums since SFAM were just good for me. The fantastic solos of Awajke or SFAM or I&W or even FII (Lines in the sand) are not so recurrent now... |
But he always had that role of riffing and soloing. Probably he is not as inspired as before , I happen to like more his recent riffs (like in TOT) than his solos. Or probably his solos did stand out on the first albums for the reason that Kevin Moore's playing complimented him. Whit the arrival of Ruddess DT is all about solos. We may be overwhelmed by them
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: December 26 2008 at 15:16
topofsm wrote:
I have to say that I think my favorite Petrucci solo is probably in "Stream of Consciousness" starting around the 3:50 mark. For such a blisteringly fast solo, in my opinion it's very well written. Most Petrucci(and metal in general) solos are bits of flurries of notes in the same key thrown together so it's just a mishmash of a few quick phrases. However, "Stream of Consciousness" is rather consistent, and I enjoy it very much.
Does anybody else agree with me? |
I would say the culminating solo in "Stream of Consciousness" is definitely in my top 5 Dream Theater moments, and possibly his best solo, edging out--from what I can remember now--the culminating solo in "Octavarium" and the numerous leads in "Learning to Live."
|
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: December 26 2008 at 18:04
The T wrote:
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
HughesJB4 wrote:
But it must be said, being able to combine incredible rhythm guitar prowess with ferocious technical lead playing is a pretty amazing. He has the rhythm guitar capabilities of James Hetfield on metal riffage times 5, and add to the fact he can do it while crossing an array of dizzying time signature and tempo changes, his rhythm playing is a feat to behold. |
I would say Hetfield has a step over him, but this is a very good point. It's his main job in the band and I think a lot of recent work suffers because he inundates it with solos and neglects the quality of his riffs. |
I think this is a good point. I personally love Petrucci's work but can't deny that his most glorious soloing-days are past him. The burden of having to carry both ends of the guitar spectrum (riffing+soloing) in a style of music that in theory should demand high quality of both has taken a toll lately. That's why, until SC, all DT albums since SFAM were just good for me. The fantastic solos of Awajke or SFAM or I&W or even FII (Lines in the sand) are not so recurrent now... |
And it is very understandable why the solos would suffer because of this.
Think about it: let's say you're Petrucci. You're deep down nothing more than a little kid from Long Island who loved Prog rock and Metal and hoped to start a band one day that would compliment both.
But how does the world see you? As a metal guitar god who is always expected to play faster and more technically with each successive release. On top of that, you've got not one but THREE jobs in the recording studio. One: you are the lead guitarist. Two: you are the rhythm guitarist. Three: you are the album's co-producer.
All those expectations to live up to, your priorities musically can get a bit muddled after awhile. I know I sure as hell would have a hard time figuring out what aspect of the music is more important after awhile.
I think JP ends up writing primarily from a solo perspective these days and leaves the rhythm sections on the back burner primarily because realistically he can only play one of the parts live. Jorden Rudess can only do so much to emulate JP's rhythm lines, and on top of that, he has his own keyboard playing to worry about. Petrucci probably feels like if he leaves his rhythm sections simple and sweet and primarily focuses on his lead work, it will help the songs not sound all that different when played live. And of course he's going to play the solos live, I mean that's what he's about.
Unfortunately it seems that things have gone into the extreme as of late, and his lead playing is consrtantly frantic and technical, while his rhythm work is quickly becoming non-existant.
I think the break the guys took between 8VM and SC was good for them, but I still found the new album a bit too focused on the aggresive side of things.
Maybe JP has just lost whatever it was before that inspired him to be more emotional with his playing?
|
Posted By: Fieldofsorrow
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 07:54
What amazes me about this entire discussion is that everyone has attacked Petrucci's emotion, without realising that it's there all along. His light and shade, his mood changes in his lead work, and the emotions that he succinctly evokes are the entire reason why I listen to his work! Every solo conjures a different feeling - 'Lie' is furious, 'As I Am' is menacing, 'Fatal Tragedy' is introspective, 'Under a Glass Moon' has a somewhat celestial feel, and 'Octavarium' is beyond the point of despair.
Whether he is shredding, or playing melodically, I personally feel that Petrucci is a masterful storyteller, and he technically deploys many harmonic devices to captivate me everytime. Sure, I couldn't JUST listen to him and no one else, but that's the same for any player.
And I don't think that's even his strongest asset. For me, he is first and foremost, a songwriter. The musical intricacies of practically all of his work with Dream Theater (perhaps excluding certain moments in Systematic Chaos, and one little slip in Octavarium) is absolutely jaw dropping, and how he so neatly strings these beautifully coherent and dynamic ten, sometimes twenty minute masterpieces together is beyond me. I truly believe he is the best at what he does - that is to say, that he is the best songwriter for progressive metal alive.
He's by no means perfect - but name a guitarist that is? I may be alone here, but I feel that JP's frequent use of 32nd notes is by no means a turn off, and I think that people that consider his playing cold and devoid of emotion are not hearing the same player I am. Anyone agree?
------------- Groovy teenage rock with mild prog tendencies: http://www.myspace.com/omniabsenceband
|
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 09:11
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
HughesJB4 wrote:
But it must be said, being able to combine incredible rhythm guitar prowess with ferocious technical lead playing is a pretty amazing. He has the rhythm guitar capabilities of James Hetfield on metal riffage times 5, and add to the fact he can do it while crossing an array of dizzying time signature and tempo changes, his rhythm playing is a feat to behold. |
I would say Hetfield has a step over him, but this is a very good point. It's his main job in the band and I think a lot of recent work suffers because he inundates it with solos and neglects the quality of his riffs. |
Maybe in terms of straight line thrash metal riffs, of course Hetfield has the edge, but remember when I say rhythm guitar, I don't just mean the metal riffs. All the cool chord voicings Petrucci does that Hetfield can't do simply due to a lack of theory knowledge, is what really elevated Petrucci's rhythm guitar beyond that of thrashing out Hetfield stuff (maybe Hetfield did other stuff beyond AJFA.....but I don't know, since I only listen to Metallica stuff from 1981-1989, don't like the rest really).
-------------
|
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 09:25
Fieldofsorrow wrote:
What amazes me about this entire discussion is that everyone has attacked Petrucci's emotion, without realising that it's there all along. His light and shade, his mood changes in his lead work, and the emotions that he succinctly evokes are the entire reason why I listen to his work! Every solo conjures a different feeling - 'Lie' is furious, 'As I Am' is menacing, 'Fatal Tragedy' is introspective, 'Under a Glass Moon' has a somewhat celestial feel, and 'Octavarium' is beyond the point of despair.
Whether he is shredding, or playing melodically, I personally feel that Petrucci is a masterful storyteller, and he technically deploys many harmonic devices to captivate me everytime. Sure, I couldn't JUST listen to him and no one else, but that's the same for any player.
And I don't think that's even his strongest asset. For me, he is first and foremost, a songwriter. The musical intricacies of practically all of his work with Dream Theater (perhaps excluding certain moments in Systematic Chaos, and one little slip in Octavarium) is absolutely jaw dropping, and how he so neatly strings these beautifully coherent and dynamic ten, sometimes twenty minute masterpieces together is beyond me. I truly believe he is the best at what he does - that is to say, that he is the best songwriter for progressive metal alive.
He's by no means perfect - but name a guitarist that is? I may be alone here, but I feel that JP's frequent use of 32nd notes is by no means a turn off, and I think that people that consider his playing cold and devoid of emotion are not hearing the same player I am. Anyone agree? |
Well, hey I agree with you in terms of the soloing, I see the emotion in his solos, fast or slow as they can be, if not necessarily the song writing part (I honestly don't like the Octavarium album much at all, and Systematic Chaos had many weak spots IMO). He indeed does have a wide emotional range in his solo, wider than that of many so called "feel" players. But my problem is, he just doesn't have a very unique voice on the guitar, as I stared above and personally, if I want to listen to a guitarist first and foremost, I go for the guys with that "you can name them straight away from their phrasing in 2 bars" guys like Satriani, Vai, Guthrie Govan and Marty Friedman.
In all truth, I used to be really full on into shred guitar, into the shred guitar scene, but because there are so many guys that just sound the same now and have crap phrasing or vibrato or whatever, it's put me off, and now I only listen to about 7-8 or so instrumental guitarists now really and don't care for the shred scene anymore, and just want to listen to guys with well........tasteful playing, like the guys I mentioned above and a few others. I still listen to Petrucci's solo album from time to time and enjoy it (and he plays rather tastefully too IMO), but it doesn't give me anywhere near the buzz of listening to a Satch, Vai, Govan or (early work) Friedman album, because I just get so much more inspired hearing those 4 very unique players with their individual phrasing, vibrato, bending style. And for me, well, part of soul-lessness (well more so, less soul and personality than the other guys I mentioned) in Petrucci's playing isn't so much that his playing isn't emotional at it's core, but more because I don't feel like I'm listening to very unique individual. I guess, when I hear Satch and Vai, I can literally hear their all their personality coming through into their lead playing, but with Petrucci, it doesn't feel "100 per cent" so to speak like those guys. if I put Govan, Satch, Vai and Friedman on a "unique factor" level of 100, Petrucci is about 65 at absolute most for me.
-------------
|
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 09:27
Fieldofsorrow wrote:
What amazes me about this entire discussion is that everyone has attacked Petrucci's emotion, without realising that it's there all along. His light and shade, his mood changes in his lead work, and the emotions that he succinctly evokes are the entire reason why I listen to his work! Every solo conjures a different feeling - 'Lie' is furious, 'As I Am' is menacing, 'Fatal Tragedy' is introspective, 'Under a Glass Moon' has a somewhat celestial feel, and 'Octavarium' is beyond the point of despair.
Whether he is shredding, or playing melodically, I personally feel that Petrucci is a masterful storyteller, and he technically deploys many harmonic devices to captivate me everytime. Sure, I couldn't JUST listen to him and no one else, but that's the same for any player.
And I don't think that's even his strongest asset. For me, he is first and foremost, a songwriter. The musical intricacies of practically all of his work with Dream Theater (perhaps excluding certain moments in Systematic Chaos, and one little slip in Octavarium) is absolutely jaw dropping, and how he so neatly strings these beautifully coherent and dynamic ten, sometimes twenty minute masterpieces together is beyond me. I truly believe he is the best at what he does - that is to say, that he is the best songwriter for progressive metal alive.
He's by no means perfect - but name a guitarist that is? I may be alone here, but I feel that JP's frequent use of 32nd notes is by no means a turn off, and I think that people that consider his playing cold and devoid of emotion are not hearing the same player I am. Anyone agree? |
That can be your opinion. That's fine.
It isn't mine.
|
Posted By: Fieldofsorrow
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 10:55
Well, that's absolutely fine. I find it very easy to distinguish Petrucci's style, but I can understand perfectly that if you can't identify with it, you're not going to get a huge amount of it. Just like I have a problem with Govan - I myself can't hear much individuality, but we all reap different rewards from different musicians, and that's what makes variety so refreshing. The only word I'd question is tasteless - I've moved away from things like jazz, like you have from shred, but I wouldn't ever consider a style that I have gone off tasteless, as such. It all has its place, don't you think?
------------- Groovy teenage rock with mild prog tendencies: http://www.myspace.com/omniabsenceband
|
Posted By: Fieldofsorrow
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 10:58
And I have no problem with that at all, my friend. I just thought that Petrucci probably needed a few more people on his side! Thanks for receiving it well.
------------- Groovy teenage rock with mild prog tendencies: http://www.myspace.com/omniabsenceband
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 11:20
Fieldofsorrow wrote:
What amazes me about this entire discussion is that everyone has attacked Petrucci's emotion, without realising that it's there all along. His light and shade, his mood changes in his lead work, and the emotions that he succinctly evokes are the entire reason why I listen to his work! Every solo conjures a different feeling - 'Lie' is furious, 'As I Am' is menacing, 'Fatal Tragedy' is introspective, 'Under a Glass Moon' has a somewhat celestial feel, and 'Octavarium' is beyond the point of despair.
Whether he is shredding, or playing melodically, I personally feel that Petrucci is a masterful storyteller, and he technically deploys many harmonic devices to captivate me everytime. Sure, I couldn't JUST listen to him and no one else, but that's the same for any player.
And I don't think that's even his strongest asset. For me, he is first and foremost, a songwriter. The musical intricacies of practically all of his work with Dream Theater (perhaps excluding certain moments in Systematic Chaos, and one little slip in Octavarium) is absolutely jaw dropping, and how he so neatly strings these beautifully coherent and dynamic ten, sometimes twenty minute masterpieces together is beyond me. I truly believe he is the best at what he does - that is to say, that he is the best songwriter for progressive metal alive.
He's by no means perfect - but name a guitarist that is? I may be alone here, but I feel that JP's frequent use of 32nd notes is by no means a turn off, and I think that people that consider his playing cold and devoid of emotion are not hearing the same player I am. Anyone agree? |
It's fine if a different aesthetic tickles you emotionally, but for me and a lot of people here it just doesn't cut it. Personally nothing JP has done after Awake besides his Evening with... album has had any impact on me besides in the cool riff department. Exception maybe to two songs.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 11:25
HughesJB4 wrote:
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
HughesJB4 wrote:
But it must be said, being able to combine incredible rhythm guitar prowess with ferocious technical lead playing is a pretty amazing. He has the rhythm guitar capabilities of James Hetfield on metal riffage times 5, and add to the fact he can do it while crossing an array of dizzying time signature and tempo changes, his rhythm playing is a feat to behold. |
I would say Hetfield has a step over him, but this is a very good point. It's his main job in the band and I think a lot of recent work suffers because he inundates it with solos and neglects the quality of his riffs. |
Maybe in terms of straight line thrash metal riffs, of course Hetfield has the edge, but remember when I say rhythm guitar, I don't just mean the metal riffs. All the cool chord voicings Petrucci does that Hetfield can't do simply due to a lack of theory knowledge, is what really elevated Petrucci's rhythm guitar beyond that of thrashing out Hetfield stuff (maybe Hetfield did other stuff beyond AJFA.....but I don't know, since I only listen to Metallica stuff from 1981-1989, don't like the rest really).
|
Voice heard. And no not much going after Justice despite me being fond of some of it.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: KingCrimson250
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 15:45
He's alright, but he got a bit lazy after the first few albums. There's nothing wrong with shredding, what's wrong is the fact that recently it seems his solos hinge upon it. You listen to solos off of stuff like Under A Glass Moon or Voices, and that's class stuff. He plays at a pretty fast clip, but not for the whole solo, and when he does do it, it has a pretty solid effect. Compare that to most of the TOT album, where he doesn't stop shredding. Not only that, but he has at least one solo (frequently more) on every song, whereas the earlier albums had cuts without solos, or solos that were less prominent. The whole thing kind of just reeks of this whole vibe that says "Hey, how can we turn this five minute song into an eleven minute song? I know, we'll just have John and Jordan w**k off for six minutes!" You can tell that he frequently really isn't putting his mind or heart into his solos any more, he just kind of does them. Having learned most of the songs of ToT on guitar (I can't play most of the solos but I have at least analyzed them) this is my major frustration. He's beginning to sound like a parody of himself.
|
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 16:06
yeah same here... every damn time I hear him. works as well as ex-lax does.
------------- The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
Posted By: Fieldofsorrow
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 16:37
Now that's an interesting point. You see, I completely disagree. I think that the Petrucci/Rudess dual leads are all very singular, and capture the mood of the song pretty neatly. Octavarium's harmony runs conjure vivid images, as do the ones in 'Beyond this Life' and 'This Dying Soul', all portraying their own colours and shades. I know it's a litte showy, but it's creative and singular, as no one does them as well, and it adds something important to the structure of the songs for me.
But hey, I like the combination of harmonic innovation and the presence of the emotions created by them. And I respect and understand fully the reasons why you get bored of them. Being a big fan of Dream Theater will naturally lead me to disagree about many aspects about the writing of music with others, but I'm always happy to discuss these things because I love music so much.
------------- Groovy teenage rock with mild prog tendencies: http://www.myspace.com/omniabsenceband
|
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 16:49
Fieldofsorrow wrote:
Well, that's absolutely fine. I find it very easy to distinguish Petrucci's style, but I can understand perfectly that if you can't identify with it, you're not going to get a huge amount of it. Just like I have a problem with Govan - I myself can't hear much individuality, but we all reap different rewards from different musicians, and that's what makes variety so refreshing. The only word I'd question is tasteless - I've moved away from things like jazz, like you have from shred, but I wouldn't ever consider a style that I have gone off tasteless, as such. It all has its place, don't you think? |
I absolutely agree with you.
And as I've said before, I really don't hate Petrucci at all. He's great for what he does, but what he does is something I'm not that personally moved by. I still like DT alot.
I feel as if I come off as a Petrucci 'basher' when I give my opinion about him, but I honestly don't mean to come off that harsh to folks.
|
Posted By: KingCrimson250
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 18:43
Fieldofsorrow wrote:
Now that's an interesting point. You see, I completely disagree. I think that the Petrucci/Rudess dual leads are all very singular, and capture the mood of the song pretty neatly. Octavarium's harmony runs conjure vivid images, as do the ones in 'Beyond this Life' and 'This Dying Soul', all portraying their own colours and shades. I know it's a litte showy, but it's creative and singular, as no one does them as well, and it adds something important to the structure of the songs for me.
But hey, I like the combination of harmonic innovation and the presence of the emotions created by them. And I respect and understand fully the reasons why you get bored of them. Being a big fan of Dream Theater will naturally lead me to disagree about many aspects about the writing of music with others, but I'm always happy to discuss these things because I love music so much. |
You know, it's interesting because I'll actually agree pertaining to the instrumental sections. This Dying Soul in particular, the intro is phenomenal. Like the harmony leads on guitar, and then the synth melody right after that leading into the verse, very powerful stuff. Conjures up all sorts of cool mental images. But to me there seems to be a big distinction between the instrumental sections and the solo sections. While the instrumental sections are often top-notch, the solos bog it down a ton, and when they do conjecture up powerful images or emotions, nine times out of ten its the rhythm and harmony doing it, while the soloist just barely manages to not ruin it completely.
|
Posted By: Avantgardehead
Date Posted: December 27 2008 at 18:51
The one good thing Petrucci's music has done for me is that it got me out of shred and made me tired of the Dream Theater writing-style. Now I can appreciate concise songs and emotions so much more!
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Avantgardian
|
Posted By: Fieldofsorrow
Date Posted: December 28 2008 at 02:53
Well, there you are. I think DT approach their actual solos in a similar way to the way jazz musicians do, in that they try and do something harmonically brilliant, or some very swift line to hook the listener. What I think a lot of prog appreciaters realise, however, is that there is so much more to a solo than that. For me, nine and a half times out of ten, he captivates the essence of the song, and that is far more important than what notes he's playing. But Steve Morse, or Al Pitrelli, or Trevor Rabin, or Marty Friedman could do the same for another that Petrucci does for me. They will all uniquely (and succinctly if it works well) add something to the overall number - if their style works for you.
When I think about it, we're probably all quite similar in that respect, it's just what we look for to satisfy our needs that differs.
------------- Groovy teenage rock with mild prog tendencies: http://www.myspace.com/omniabsenceband
|
Posted By: PetrucciPal
Date Posted: December 28 2008 at 11:14
Fieldofsorrow wrote:
Well, there you are. I think DT approach their actual solos in a similar way to the way jazz musicians do, in that they try and do something harmonically brilliant, or some very swift line to hook the listener. What I think a lot of prog appreciaters realise, however, is that there is so much more to a solo than that. For me, nine and a half times out of ten, he captivates the essence of the song, and that is far more important than what notes he's playing. But Steve Morse, or Al Pitrelli, or Trevor Rabin, or Marty Friedman could do the same for another that Petrucci does for me. They will all uniquely (and succinctly if it works well) add something to the overall number - if their style works for you.
When I think about it, we're probably all quite similar in that respect, it's just what we look for to satisfy our needs that differs. |
Well, they WERE in the jazz part of Berklee, or whatever. lol or so I hear.
------------- For the <3 of John Petrucci!
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 18:14
PetrucciPal wrote:
Fieldofsorrow wrote:
Well, there you are. I think DT approach their actual solos in a similar way to the way jazz musicians do, in that they try and do something harmonically brilliant, or some very swift line to hook the listener. What I think a lot of prog appreciaters realise, however, is that there is so much more to a solo than that. For me, nine and a half times out of ten, he captivates the essence of the song, and that is far more important than what notes he's playing. But Steve Morse, or Al Pitrelli, or Trevor Rabin, or Marty Friedman could do the same for another that Petrucci does for me. They will all uniquely (and succinctly if it works well) add something to the overall number - if their style works for you.
When I think about it, we're probably all quite similar in that respect, it's just what we look for to satisfy our needs that differs. |
Well, they WERE in the jazz part of Berklee, or whatever. lol or so I hear. |
I would love to see them playing jazz. I mean , real jazz not "LTE2 jazz". In my opinion solos have to be built and played in the right moment , the best guitarrists in the world know that. Petrucci kinda forgot about this
|
Posted By: DavetheSlave
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 18:22
Petrucci is quite simply the best prog / rock guitarist out there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! All the unbelievers - well try to emulate his guitar style!!!!! Guitar w**king - SO!!!!! Do what he does and then let's talk about it!!!!
------------- I'm a normal psychopath
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 18:34
DavetheSlave wrote:
Petrucci is quite simply the best prog / rock guitarist out there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! All the unbelievers - well try to emulate his guitar style!!!!! Guitar w**king - SO!!!!! Do what he does and then let's talk about it!!!! |
Are you serious? There are plenty of guitarrists out there that outshine him. Zappa , Fripp , Vai. Holdsworth Even among the less known ones: Scott Henderson and a japanese guitarrist called "Yoxox" from the group Ain Soph. All of them have something in common , a signature sound JP in my opinion lacks of.
Of course if you talk about technical aspects he is said to be among the best but I don't care about that.
|
Posted By: DavetheSlave
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 18:42
I've been a fan of Stevie Vai, Frank Zappa etc etc all my life - Petrucci murders them for style and content!! If Zappa had ever had a hand in - never mind written much of - scenes from a memory - then I could possibly agree with you.
------------- I'm a normal psychopath
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 18:48
But since I am no musician. I can't appreciate the technical aspects , I just guide by my likings.
|
Posted By: DavetheSlave
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 18:51
Hi Crimson87 - surely you like "Scenes from a Memory???????
------------- I'm a normal psychopath
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 18:55
Yeah , I do. But check the album Hat and Field by Ain Soph and you 'll realize what I am talking about.
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 01:42
HughesJB4 wrote:
Well I only just realized this thread was not originally in the Appreciation section, so my bad if I sounded a bit harsh earlier
|
Well it was moved to Appreciation almost immediately, so you're covered. :P
DavetheSlave wrote:
Hi Crimson87 - surely you like "Scenes from a Memory??????? |
Is liking it a requirement?
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: jplanet
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 02:33
DavetheSlave wrote:
Hi Crimson87 - surely you like "Scenes from a Memory??????? |
Perhaps he does, and perhaps he doesn't, but whatever you do, don't call him "Shirley".
------------- https://www.facebook.com/ShadowCircus/" rel="nofollow - ..::welcome to the shadow circus::..
|
Posted By: PetrucciPal
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 10:33
Avantgardehead wrote:
The one good thing Petrucci's music has done for me is that it got me out of shred and made me tired of the Dream Theater writing-style. Now I can appreciate concise songs and emotions so much more! |
But Dream Theater's FULL of emotion- I don't understand why people don't think they are. Ever heard Hollow Years? Just Let Me Breathe? Even Repentance contains a certain amount of feeling. Petrucci doesn't shred on some songs....but even when he does, it just makes the song better =)
------------- For the <3 of John Petrucci!
|
Posted By: PetrucciPal
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 10:34
Yes. lol no actually, liking the Train of Thought album is a requirement. If you don't, then you're not a real Dream Theater fan. lol jk XD
------------- For the <3 of John Petrucci!
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 14:17
Have you cheched Hat & Field yet?
|
Posted By: PetrucciPal
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 14:19
crimson87 wrote:
Have you cheched Hat & Field yet? |
...what band? Or is that the band name? lol
------------- For the <3 of John Petrucci!
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 14:21
The band is called Ain Soph , it's from japan
|
Posted By: PetrucciPal
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 14:25
crimson87 wrote:
The band is called Ain Soph , it's from japan |
lol it's...interesting. XD
------------- For the <3 of John Petrucci!
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 15:35
PetrucciPal wrote:
Yes. lol no actually, liking the Train of Thought album is a requirement. If you don't, then you're not a real Dream Theater fan. lol jk XD |
Well I agree that you're not a Dream Theater fan if you don't like it, but why would I want to be a Dream Theater fan? :P
I was asking in reference to being on this website.
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 15:44
PetrucciPal wrote:
lol it's...interesting. XD |
See , there is life beyond shredding!
|
Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 17:02
I only can really appreciate one of his solos: the solo at the climax of Voices. Not only his greatest solo, but a world class solo as well I can safely say. I'm going to keep further opinions to myself in fear of upsetting the DT fanboys
------------- "Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."
Arnold Schoenberg
|
Posted By: MovingPictures07
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 20:06
Dream Theater isn't my favorite band, but Scenes from a Memory alone shows that both Dream Theater and Petrucci can be heavily accomplished in fields of technicality AND emotion. No metal album can top that, IMO. The powerful combination of virtuosity, emotion, and songwriting is what makes Dream Theater the most representative progressive metal band. When they're on the top of their game, they deserve that title. When they're not, we get Falling into Infinity.
Nonetheless, SFAM and Six Degrees are worth owning alone just for sheer brilliance (followed by Images and Words and Awake).
Be hating on Dream Theater if you want, but I'd stand alone if I had to on my praise for their musicianship and accomplishments. Petrucci isn't my favorite guitarist, but he hardly gets the respect he deserves around these parts; and I'm glad this appreciation thread was created.
You don't have to agree with me, but that's my two cents. If Scenes from a Memory doesn't move you emotionally by the time you're done listening to it, then I find that hard to understand.
-------------
|
Posted By: Fieldofsorrow
Date Posted: December 31 2008 at 02:14
I completely agree with MovingPictures07. Scenes From A Memory is fantastically well paced, with high emotion throughout the entire album, with each song providing its own flavour to this impossibly complex yet elaborate album. And that is why I regard Petrucci first and foremost as a songwriter.
------------- Groovy teenage rock with mild prog tendencies: http://www.myspace.com/omniabsenceband
|
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: December 31 2008 at 03:24
PetrucciPal wrote:
Avantgardehead wrote:
The one good thing Petrucci's music has done for me is that it got me out of shred and made me tired of the Dream Theater writing-style. Now I can appreciate concise songs and emotions so much more! |
But Dream Theater's FULL of emotion- I don't understand why people don't think they are. Ever heard Hollow Years? Just Let Me Breathe? Even Repentance contains a certain amount of feeling. Petrucci doesn't shred on some songs....but even when he does, it just makes the song better =) |
But full of emotion in relation to what? I am sure you are comparing Petrucci with some other guitarists and not just talking about emotion in an absolute sense, because in an absolute sense, all music is emotional, how emotional is as the listener perceives. Now, have you heard Steve Hackett's work with Genesis or his solo albums because I cannot find anything as emotional as Spectral Mornings (song) or Shadow of the Hierophant in Petrucci's solos. Even what looks superficially like a typical upbeat rock solo in Every Day, Hackett invests so much emotion into his every note, that it ends up becoming astonishingly memorable. If you say Hackett doesn't shred and so you don't like his style, there you are. People look for different things from the same artists.
|
Posted By: PetrucciPal
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 17:03
Henry Plainview wrote:
PetrucciPal wrote:
Yes. lol no actually, liking the Train of Thought album is a requirement. If you don't, then you're not a real Dream Theater fan. lol jk XD |
Well I agree that you're not a Dream Theater fan if you don't like it, but why would I want to be a Dream Theater fan? :P
I was asking in reference to being on this website. |
Because Dream Theater
is
AMAZING. ^_^
------------- For the <3 of John Petrucci!
|
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 22:10
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Dream Theater isn't my favorite band, but Scenes from a Memory alone shows that both Dream Theater and Petrucci can be heavily accomplished in fields of technicality AND emotion. No metal album can top that, IMO. The powerful combination of virtuosity, emotion, and songwriting is what makes Dream Theater the most representative progressive metal band. When they're on the top of their game, they deserve that title. When they're not, we get Falling into Infinity.
Nonetheless, SFAM and Six Degrees are worth owning alone just for sheer brilliance (followed by Images and Words and Awake).
Be hating on Dream Theater if you want, but I'd stand alone if I had to on my praise for their musicianship and accomplishments. Petrucci isn't my favorite guitarist, but he hardly gets the respect he deserves around these parts; and I'm glad this appreciation thread was created.
You don't have to agree with me, but that's my two cents. If Scenes from a Memory doesn't move you emotionally by the time you're done listening to it, then I find that hard to understand.
|
Petrucci gets a lot of respect at this forum board. You start a thread, asking who likes Petrucci, and I guarantee you'll get many takers. And oh, I can perfectly understand why someone might not be moved by SFAM. They could hate DT for a start.........
-------------
|
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 22:16
Rogerthat, for the record, Steve Hackett does do right hand tapping and 3 note per string legato stuff, so technically, he does actually shred. Okay, fair enough, he didn't do that stuff while in Genesis really, but in his solo records, he does some shed stuff. It's more a question of whether you find his style enjoyable or not really. Personally, I think Steve Hackett incorporates shred technique into his solos very tastefully, an opinion I'm sure you share. I tend to find his playing pretty packed with emotion too and he's definitely one of the better lead players in rock.
But yeah, to keep it on topic, Petrucci is not bad:P
-------------
|
Posted By: Leningrad
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 22:22
Wow, a Petrucci thread that didn't get beaten into the ground by trolls by page two? This place has definitely undergone changes as of late. I'm impressed. And utterly appalled.
|
Posted By: topofsm
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 22:23
HughesJB4 wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Dream Theater isn't my favorite band, but Scenes from a Memory alone shows that both Dream Theater and Petrucci can be heavily accomplished in fields of technicality AND emotion. No metal album can top that, IMO. The powerful combination of virtuosity, emotion, and songwriting is what makes Dream Theater the most representative progressive metal band. When they're on the top of their game, they deserve that title. When they're not, we get Falling into Infinity.
Nonetheless, SFAM and Six Degrees are worth owning alone just for sheer brilliance (followed by Images and Words and Awake).
Be hating on Dream Theater if you want, but I'd stand alone if I had to on my praise for their musicianship and accomplishments. Petrucci isn't my favorite guitarist, but he hardly gets the respect he deserves around these parts; and I'm glad this appreciation thread was created.
You don't have to agree with me, but that's my two cents. If Scenes from a Memory doesn't move you emotionally by the time you're done listening to it, then I find that hard to understand.
|
Petrucci gets a lot of respect at this forum board. You start a thread, asking who likes Petrucci, and I guarantee you'll get many takers. And oh, I can perfectly understand why someone might not be moved by SFAM. They could hate DT for a start.........
|
Well I just got SFAM this past week (I'm still working on my DT collection) and I've listened to it about 3 times and I still don't see what the whole fuss is about.
Maybe a couple more times will help.
I think my favorite Petrucci solos are as follows:
1. Stream of Consciousness
2. Hell's Kitchen
3. Under a Glass Moon
They all utilize the shred technique, and IMO they are all extremely well written. I enjoy well written solos, as opposed to oppurtunities to throw a few shred phrases together and call it a solo.
-------------
|
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 22:26
^Yeah, I personally don't understand why SFAM is hailed as the best DT album ever either. Images and Words is just on another level IMO. Stream of Consciousness is still my favorite DT instrumental. I remember when I heard Stream of Consciousness for the first time, back in late 2006. It was such an intense and beautiful experience, I listened to it on repeat so many times.
-------------
|
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 22:30
HughesJB4 wrote:
Rogerthat, for the record, Steve Hackett does do right hand tapping and 3 note per string legato stuff, so technically, he does actually shred. Okay, fair enough, he didn't do that stuff while in Genesis really, but in his solo records, he does some shed stuff. It's more a question of whether you find his style enjoyable or not really. Personally, I think Steve Hackett incorporates shred technique into his solos very tastefully, an opinion I'm sure you share. I tend to find his playing pretty packed with emotion too and he's definitely one of the better lead players in rock.
|
Yeah, I know, I meant shredding more in a relative sense, it's not face-melting shredding we are talking about when it's Hackett -he has done tapping on Dancing With The Moonlit Knight by the way and a few other Genesis songs, I know of this song for sure because I have seen him use tapping in the video of this song. And there is the incredibly elegant use of tapping in Shadow of the Hierophant which makes for a nice contrast with the most popular example of tapping in rock - Eruption, which came out about three years later. My experience of Hackett's solo records stops at Spectral Mornings, so I don't know if he used shredding in the more conventional, furious sense in later albums, knowing what little I do of the man, I doubt it. It would not do for Hackett to burn the axe when he can caress it as lovingly as he can. Anyway, as I said, I can well understand that people would not find his style exciting enough because they might look for different things from electric guitar, it's all down to one's tastes.
|
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 22:35
^Although it's started to veer pretty off topic, I will have to say, I think Steve Hackett continued to make some fantastic music as a solo artist after Spectral Mornings, so definitely check out his later work. I actually don't even listen to Genesis anymore to be honest, but I still listen to solo Hackett stuff at least, once a week, if not more. There is some stuff from his post 2000 releases that have actually pretty face melting technical stuff, but still within the boundaries of tasteful IMO.
-------------
|
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 22:41
Thanks, will get to his later albums. End of Hackett appreciation sub- thread!
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: January 03 2009 at 00:28
I think the only player in DT who is the shiz is Kevin Moore. Too bad he is not in DT now
|
Posted By: KingCrimson250
Date Posted: January 04 2009 at 21:35
The Pessimist wrote:
I only can really appreciate one of his solos: the solo at the climax of Voices. Not only his greatest solo, but a world class solo as well I can safely say. I'm going to keep further opinions to myself in fear of upsetting the DT fanboys
|
YES.
I wonder if that's it. When it came to DT I started with Train of Thought and then moved on to 6DOIT, and I thought both were okay. But Awake came next, and while I'd thought of Petrucci as an awesome guitarist, I was absolutely blown away by Voices. To me Voices is a bit like Firth of Fifth in the sense that the rest of the album could have been euro-pop dance beats and I STILL would rank it my favourite album just because of the presence of the one song.
Anyway, back on topic, Voices (and then a couple choice cuts off IAW) absolutely floored me and I could never really back into his later guitaring as much. I'd opened the Pandora's Box - I'd heard exactly what Petrucci is capable of and how much better it is than what he's been doing recently. I could never go back.
As I've said, there is nothing inherently wrong with shred. But when it's all speed all the time, like on ToT... That's just laziness. It's saying "I've honed my chops to an unbelievable level so I'll just go as fast as I can on every solo and not put any effort or creativity into it." I mean some of his solos on ToT are good, but they sound the exact same as all his other solos on ToT, and really, all his other solos on 6DOIT (never understood the high praise for that album. The second disc in particular was disappointing) and while I haven't heard it yet, presumably all his other solos on Octavarium as well.
|
Posted By: doneitall99
Date Posted: June 07 2009 at 05:04
Hollow Years solo - Live at Budokhan
Argument over
|
Posted By: keiser willhelm
Date Posted: June 07 2009 at 15:34
The only dream theater song id go out of my way to listen to, meaning the only one id listen to that didnt come up on a random iTunes shuffle, would be Hells Kitchen. tasteful, shredly at times, just a good song with a very memorable melody. mission accomplished. not much else tickles my fancey however. . .
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/KeiserWillhelm" rel="nofollow - What im listening to
|
Posted By: KingCrimson250
Date Posted: June 07 2009 at 17:10
|