Print Page | Close Window

Funkadelic for space rock/ heavy prog?

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Suggest New Bands and Artists
Forum Description: Suggest, create polls, and classify new bands you would like included on Prog Archives
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=51311
Printed Date: November 29 2024 at 19:34
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Funkadelic for space rock/ heavy prog?
Posted By: TaoJones
Subject: Funkadelic for space rock/ heavy prog?
Date Posted: August 26 2008 at 22:46

This may be a long shot but it seams to me that they have at least some chance of qualifying. After listening to them for a long time I have decided that many of the aspects of a progressive rock band can be found in their albums. Fantastic musicianship, "epic" tracks drenched in atmospheric soundscapes, conceptual albums/ reacuring musical concepts and great history behind the bands evolution.

It is true that they eventually became more of a dance group later on with Parliament but their origins are truly progressive.

If you are unfamiliar with the group check out the album "Maggot brain" to hear probably their most progressive work.

What do you say?

 



Replies:
Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: August 26 2008 at 23:22
Welcome TaoJones!

"Ow, we got the funk, give up the funk"


I was thinking about this topic just the other day.  I used to listen to P-Funk a lot (very big on it, an old username of mine was based on P-Funk), and I think they were influenced by Prog at one stage (when they went more rock).  I wish I still had my "Maggot Brain" album, that certainly has psyche qualities.  There was a great documentary I saw on Parliament-Funkadelic on youtube before (darn, it's gone, was useful for the history of the band).

Here's a youtube clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh3bleXWaCk&feature=related - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh3bleXWaCk&feature=related

Here's an interesting topic:
forum_posts.asp?TID=45943&KW=Funk - Funkadelic - a psych funk band like no other
By member_profile.asp?PF=18202 - drziltox , February 04 2008 at 14:34


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: jimidom
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 15:32

I would say yes. love P-Funk, and there are definitely some Prog influences in their music, their thematic elements, and their theatrics. The first 4 Funkadelic albums including Maggot Brain and Free Your Mind... were incredible. George Clinton himself is knowledgable when it comes to Prog. I recall him answering a King Crimson question on Rock & Roll Jeopardy (or is question an answer?), and in the History of Rock & Roll documentary he cited Prog as an influence in the use of synth as the bass.



-------------
"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." - HST



Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 15:42
Please guys Funkadelic  IS FUNK not Prog.
 
Funkadelic enters un the category of R&B!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
BTW: Ansering a Jeopardy question about King Crimson doesn't qualify for Prog artist neither the use od synths.
 
We are crossing the line each day more.
 
Who's next.?....KC & The Sunshine Band? Or maybe Earth Wind & Fire? 
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: Windhawk
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 15:47
Time for a new genre then - progressive r&b ;-)

-------------
Websites I work with:

http://www.progressor.net
http://www.houseofprog.com

My profile on Mixcloud:
https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 15:53
P-Funk is more than funk.  If only that documentary was still up on youtube, it gives a very good overview (of course r&b is a strong component).  They had what I would call a progressive funk-rock mixed with psyche phase.  I think there are  a lot of great progressive funk bands -- especially jazz-funk rock  (wish prog funk was, if not a category here, funk was a tag here).

Check out this live performance from '79.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAn0DU3qcuo&feature=related - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAn0DU3qcuo&feature=related (sure it's bluesy)

Here's a cool one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99pY1wcXTh4 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99pY1wcXTh4


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 16:05
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

P-Funk is more than funk.  If only that documentary was still up on youtube, it gives a very good overview (of course r&b is a strong component).  They had what I would call a progressive funk-rock mixed with psyche phase.  I think there are  a lot of great progressive funk bands -- especially jazz-funk rock  (wish prog funk was, if not a category here, funk was a tag here).

Check out this live performance from '79.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAn0DU3qcuo&feature=related - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAn0DU3qcuo&feature=related (sure it's bluesy)
 
Logan, I'm absolutely familiar with Funkadelic, I have
 
  1. Free your Mind and your Ass will Follow
  2. Funkadelic
  3. Maggot Brain
  4. America Eats it's Young
  5. Lat's Take it to the Stage
  6. Uncle Jam Wants You
  7. Who's a Funkafelic

No traces of Prog, it's Funk with Psyche reminiscences, but nothing more, it's pure R&B. We are not Funk Archives, We are not Jazxz Archives, We are not Pop Archives, we are Prog Archives for God's sake, and each day we're abandoning everything Prog means.

There's already people talking aboout Prog Rap for God's sake.
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 16:13
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

P-Funk is more than funk.  If only that documentary was still up on youtube, it gives a very good overview (of course r&b is a strong component).  They had what I would call a progressive funk-rock mixed with psyche phase.  I think there are  a lot of great progressive funk bands -- especially jazz-funk rock  (wish prog funk was, if not a category here, funk was a tag here).

Check out this live performance from '79.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAn0DU3qcuo&feature=related - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAn0DU3qcuo&feature=related (sure it's bluesy)
 
Logan, I'm absolutely familiar with Funkadelic, I have
 
  1. Free your Mind and your Ass will Follow
  2. Funkadelic
  3. Maggot Brain
  4. America Eats it's Young
  5. Lat's Take it to the Stage
  6. Uncle Jam Wants You
  7. Who's a Funkafelic

No traces of Prog, it's Funk with Psyche reminiscences, but nothing more, it's pure R&B. We are not Funk Archives, We are not Jazxz Archives, We are not Pop Archives, we are Prog Archives for God's sake, and each day we're abandoning everything Prog means.

There's already people talking aboout Prog Rap for God's sake.
 
Iván


Okay.  Some albums seem prog related to me, but I have a fairly broad idea of progressive rock.


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 16:14
 
Billboard.com
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe~T30I">YearSort%20Order
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe~T30C">Album
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe~T30E">Chart
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe~T30B">Peak
1971 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jifixqy5ldfe~R">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe - Maggot Brain Black Albums 14
1971 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jifixqy5ldfe~R">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe - Maggot Brain Pop Albums 108
1990 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jifixqy5ldfe~R">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe - Maggot Brain Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums 92
 
Billboard.com
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hifixqy5ldfe~T30I">YearSort%20Order
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hifixqy5ldfe~T30C">Album
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hifixqy5ldfe~T30E">Chart
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hifixqy5ldfe~T30B">Peak
1970 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:hifixqy5ldfe~R">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hifixqy5ldfe - Funkadelic Black Albums 8
1970 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:hifixqy5ldfe~R">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hifixqy5ldfe - Funkadelic Pop Albums 126
1976 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:hifixqy5ldfe~R">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hifixqy5ldfe - Funkadelic Black Albums 58
 
Billboard.com
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe~T30I">YearSort%20Order
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe~T30C">Album
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe~T30E">Chart
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe~T30B">Peak
1971 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jifixqy5ldfe~R">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe - Maggot Brain Black Albums 14
1971 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jifixqy5ldfe~R">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe - Maggot Brain Pop Albums 108
1990 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jifixqy5ldfe~R">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifixqy5ldfe - Maggot Brain Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums 92
 
 
Billboard.com
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kifixqy5ldfe~T30I">YearSort%20Order
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kifixqy5ldfe~T30C">Album
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kifixqy5ldfe~T30E">Chart
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kifixqy5ldfe~T30B">Peak
1972 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:kifixqy5ldfe~R">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kifixqy5ldfe - America Eats Its Young Black Albums 22
1972 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:kifixqy5ldfe~R">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kifixqy5ldfe - America Eats Its Young Pop Albums 123
 
Nuff' said:
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 16:50
As I don't use the billboard charts for reference (well once I did), I'm not sure how useful they are for Prog and Prog-Related classification here.  I'd have to do a comparative analysis (look up popular prog, prog-related and proto-prog artists in the archives and see how they have been classified).

-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 17:18
Most of them have received awards for Rock, some for POP (Some of this bands are milsleabeled or Billboard used the generic term PÖP) but the fact that Funkadelic is R&B is undeniable, the problem os the R&B not the POP because this guys call POP to everything.
 
As a fact I don't believe Funkadelic is POP, that is silly, but neither is Prog or rrelated IMO, just Good Funk or R&B with some Psyche hints as The 5th Dimension, nothing else..
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 17:23
Okay, first one I thought of, Supertramp (taken from the same site you got those from -- all music)

1975 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:k9foxq85ldke%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:k9foxq85ldke - Crime Of The Century
Pop Albums 38
1976 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:09foxq85ldke%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:09foxq85ldke - Crisis? What Crisis?
Pop Albums 44
1977 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:w9foxq85ldke%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:w9foxq85ldke - Even In The Quietest Moments...
Pop Albums 16
1978 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:f9foxq85ldke%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:f9foxq85ldke - Supertramp
Pop Albums158
1979 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:d9fpxq85ld0e%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:d9fpxq85ld0e - Breakfast In America
Pop Albums 1
1980 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:f9fpxq85ld0e%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:f9fpxq85ld0e - Paris
Pop Albums 8
1982 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:g9fpxq85ld0e%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:g9fpxq85ld0e - ...famous last words...
Pop Albums 5

Only mentions them as pop.

Let's try Genesis since it's your favourite band:

1974 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:gifyxqu5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:gifyxqu5ldhe - From Genesis To Revelation
Pop Albums170
1974 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:aifyxqu5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:aifyxqu5ldhe - Genesis Live
Pop Albums105
1974 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:0ifyxqu5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:0ifyxqu5ldhe - Selling England By The Pound
Pop Albums 70
1975 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:3ifuxqu5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:3ifuxqu5ldhe - The Lamb Lies Down On Broadway
Pop Albums 41
1976 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:gifuxqu5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:gifuxqu5ldhe - A Trick Of The Tail
Pop Albums 31
1977 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:hifuxqu5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hifuxqu5ldhe - Seconds Out
Pop Albums 47
1977 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jifuxqu5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifuxqu5ldhe - Wind & Wuthering
Pop Albums 26
1978 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:kifuxqu5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kifuxqu5ldhe - And Then There Were Three...
Pop Albums 14
1980 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:aifuxqu5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:aifuxqu5ldhe - Duke
Pop Albums 11
1981 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:wifuxqu5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:wifuxqu5ldhe - Abacab
Pop Albums 7
1982  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:3ifixqu5ldhe - Three Sides Live
Pop Albums 10
1983 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:difixqu5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:difixqu5ldhe - Genesis
Pop Albums 9

Pop. Same for individual albums I looked up.

So not sure of the significance (either of pop or black albums)

Looks up Frank Zappa:

1967 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:apfwxqq5ldse%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:apfwxqq5ldse - Absolutely Free
Pop Albums 41
1967 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:kcfwxqw5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kcfwxqw5ldhe - Freak Out!
Pop Albums130
1968 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:3pfexqq5ldse%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:3pfexqq5ldse - Lumpy Gravy
Pop Albums159
1968 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:dpfexqq5ldse%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:dpfexqq5ldse - We're Only In It For The Money
Pop Albums 30
1969 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:0pfyxqq5ldse%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:0pfyxqq5ldse - Cruising with Ruben & The Jets
Pop Albums110
1969 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:fpfexqq5ldse%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:fpfexqq5ldse - Hot Rats
Pop Albums173
1969  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:avftxqr5ldse - Mothermania/The Best Of The Mothers  Pop Albums151
1969 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:dvfrxq85ldde%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:dvfrxq85ldde - Uncle Meat
Pop Albums 43
1970 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:avftxqr5ldde%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:avftxqr5ldde - Burnt Weeny Sandwich
Pop Albums 94
1970 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jpfexqq5ldse%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jpfexqq5ldse - Chunga's Revenge
Pop Albums119
1970 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:apfexqq5ldse%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:apfexqq5ldse - Weasels Ripped My Flesh
Pop Albums189
1971 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:3ifuxq8gldfe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:3ifuxq8gldfe - Frank Zappa's 200 Motels
Pop Albums 59
1971 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:3bfoxqu5ldse%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:3bfoxqu5ldse - The Mothers/Fillmore East-June 1971
Pop Albums 38
1972 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:apfyxqq5ldse%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:apfyxqq5ldse - Just Another Band From L.A.
Pop Albums 85
1972 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:kcfrxqw5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kcfrxqw5ldhe - Waka/Jawaka - Hot Rats
Pop Albums152
 etc. 

Well I'll give you that Frank Zappa, Genesis, And Supertramp aren't black.

Now looking up someone who is black:

1969 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jifyxqtgldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifyxqtgldhe - In A Silent Way
Black Albums 40
1969 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jifyxqtgldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifyxqtgldhe - In A Silent Way
Jazz Albums 3
1969 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jifyxqtgldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jifyxqtgldhe - In A Silent Way
Pop Albums134
1969  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:aiftxqtgldhe - Miles Davis' Greatest Hits  Jazz Albums 4
1970 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:0ifyxqtgldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:0ifyxqtgldhe - Bitches Brew
Black Albums 4
1970 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:0ifyxqtgldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:0ifyxqtgldhe - Bitches Brew
Jazz Albums 1
1970 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:0ifyxqtgldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:0ifyxqtgldhe - Bitches Brew
Pop Albums 35
1971 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:fzfqxqygld0e%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:fzfqxqygld0e - Miles Davis At Fillmore
Jazz Albums 1
1971 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:fzfqxqygld0e%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:fzfqxqygld0e - Miles Davis At Fillmore
Pop Albums123
1971 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jzftxqygld0e%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jzftxqygld0e - A Tribute To Jack Johnson
Black Albums 47
1971 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jzftxqygld0e%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jzftxqygld0e - A Tribute To Jack Johnson
Jazz Albums 4
1971 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:jzftxqygld0e%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jzftxqygld0e - A Tribute To Jack Johnson
Pop Albums159
1972 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:dzfyxqygld0e%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:dzfyxqygld0e - Live-Evil
Pop Albums125
1972 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:gifuxqtgldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:gifuxqtgldhe - On The Corner
Jazz Albums 1
1972 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:gifuxqtgldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:gifuxqtgldhe - On The Corner
Pop Albums156
1973  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kifuxqtgldhe - Basic Miles - The Classic Performances Of Miles Davis  Jazz Albums 21
1973  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kifuxqtgldhe - Basic Miles - The Classic Performances Of Miles Davis  Pop Albums189
1973 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:dzfyxqygld0e%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:dzfyxqygld0e - Live-Evil
Jazz Albums 4
1974 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:3ifixqtgldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:3ifixqtgldhe - Big Fun
Jazz Albums 6
1974 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:3ifixqtgldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:3ifixqtgldhe - Big Fun
Pop Albums

And another:

1968  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:39fexqekldje - Are You Experienced?
Black Albums 10
1968  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:39fexqekldje - Are You Experienced?
Pop Albums 5
1968 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:3ifqxq85ldje%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:3ifqxq85ldje - Axis: Bold As Love
Black Albums 6
1968 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:3ifqxq85ldje%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:3ifqxq85ldje - Axis: Bold As Love
Pop Albums 3
1968 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:fifqxq85ldje%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:fifqxq85ldje - Electric Ladyland
Black Albums 5
1968 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:fifqxq85ldje%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:fifqxq85ldje - Electric Ladyland
Pop Albums 1
1968  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:0vfoxqq5ldhe - Get That Feeling  Pop Albums 75
1969 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:difqxq85ldje%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:difqxq85ldje - Smash Hits
Black Albums 22
1969 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:difqxq85ldje%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:difqxq85ldje - Smash Hits
Pop Albums 6
1970 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:gifqxq85ldje%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:gifqxq85ldje - Band Of Gypsys
Black Albums 14
1970 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:gifqxq85ldje%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:gifqxq85ldje - Band Of Gypsys
Pop Albums 5

So out of that list he came up with two "black" albums.  Now I'll try to think of somebody who is black, but sings white -- lol.

1962  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:fifrxq8gldje - What Kind Of Fool Am I And Other Show-Stoppers  Pop Albums 14
1963 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:abfpxqu5ldfe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:abfpxqu5ldfe - As Long As She Needs Me
Pop Albums 73
1963  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:gifrxq8gldje - Sammy Davis Jr. At The Cocoanut Grove  Pop Albums 96
1964 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:gvfuxql5ldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:gvfuxql5ldhe - Sammy Davis Jr. Salutes The Stars Of The London Palladium
Pop Albums139
1964 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:wbfpxqu5ldfe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:wbfpxqu5ldfe - The Shelter Of Your Arms
Pop Albums 26
1965 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:fcfqxqwgldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:fcfqxqwgldhe - Our Shining Hour
Pop Albums141
1965 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:3bfqxqu5ldfe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:3bfqxqu5ldfe - Sammy's Back On Broadway
Pop Albums104
1969 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:dbfqxqu5ldfe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:dbfqxqu5ldfe - I've Gotta Be Me
Pop Albums 24
1969  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:gbfrxqualdje - Sweet Charity  Pop Albums 72
1972  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:0ifrxq8gldje - Portrait Of Sammy Davis, Jr.  Pop Albums128
1972  http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kifrxq8gldje - Sammy Davis Jr. Now  Pop Albums 11
1972 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:a9fqxqtkldhe%7ER">Listen%20Now! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:a9fqxqtkldhe - The People Tree
Pop Singles 92


Ah yes, so black is a style/ genre, but can it not be be prog if classified that way (obviously the pop is meaningless as it just mean popular music)?  

Sorry, the charts are pretty  meaningless to me.

Edit: You got in as I was preparing my post. Not every P-Funk album at the charts is listed as R&B, and I'm not sure that prog-related (or even progressive rock) rock can not be strongly R&B under this site's purview.




-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 17:33
As I told you, the POP moniker is silly, my objection towards Funkadelic is not based in being POP because as I said before, they apply this term to almost anything and as I also said before I don't believe Funkaedic is POP.
.
But R&B they are, FUNK they are that's undeniable (BTW: IMO Supertramp is mainly POP).
 
And about Black albums, all the R&B, Soul, Gospel, etc albums were called Black Albums from 1969 to 1978 (If I'm not wrong about the year), stupid term but that was how it was used.
 
Iván
 
Yep I was right about the year:
 
Quote Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums is a chart published by Billboard magazine that ranks R&B and hip hop albums based on sales compiled by Nielsen SoundScan. The name of the chart was changed from Top R&B Albums in 1999. The chart debuted in the magazine as Hot R&B LPs in 1965 and were also called Top Black Albums; from 1969-1978 they were identified as Soul charts. The Billboard Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums tracks the albums of quiet storm, urban contemporary, soul music R&B, new jack swing, hip hop, and sometimes house music artists.
 
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_R&B/Hip-Hop_Albums - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_R&B/Hip-Hop_Albums


-------------
            


Posted By: jimidom
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 17:38

Wow! Well done, Ivan! OK, maybe P-Funk does not belong in the Archives because there is no sub-genre yet that exists for which they would classify. However,  if you insist on pigeonholing them strictly within the Funk/R&B genre, then you must admit that there was no band nor has there ever been a band like P-Funk. They funked harder than all the others, and they funked more progressively than all the others, no pun intended, including KC and EWF. Besides, no one said anything about adding the latter two to the Archives.

P-Funk's music was every bit as explorational as it was danceable. Don't fault them for being heavy on the one because they got jazzy and improvisational when it counted. Also, their thematic elements, characters, and science fiction/ space mythology would make Zeuhl Heads and Space Rockers proud. Some examples are the Children of Production, Starchild, Dr. Funkenstein, the Bop Gun, the Flashlight, the Thumpasaurus People, Sir Nose D'Voidoffunk, and of course the Mothership. That's a lot of conceptualism for a strictly Funk/ R&B band.
 
The musicians who have played with P-Funk have been top notch, especially Eddie Hazel, Bernie Worrell, Bootsy Collins, Dennis Chambers, Michael Hampton, Maceo Parker, and Fred Wesley.  Also, have you ever seen P-Funk live?  They would outlast a lot of jam bands. I saw P-Funk in 1996 in Austin, and they played an almost 4 hour set!
 
 


-------------
"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." - HST



Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 17:49
Originally posted by jimidom jimidom wrote:

Wow! Well done, Ivan! OK, maybe P-Funk does not belong in the Archives because there is no sub-genre yet that exists for which they would classify. However,  if you insist on pigeonholing them strictly within the Funk/R&B genre, then you must admit that there was no band nor has there ever been a band like P-Funk. They funked harder than all the others, and they funked more progressively than all the others, no pun intended, including KC and EWF. Besides, no one said anything about adding the latter two to the Archives.

P-Funk's music was every bit as explorational as it was danceable. Don't fault them for being heavy on the one because they got jazzy and improvisational when it counted. Also, their thematic elements, characters, and science fiction/ space mythology would make Zeuhl Heads and Space Rockers proud. Some examples are the Children of Production, Starchild, Dr. Funkenstein, the Bop Gun, the Flashlight, the Thumpasaurus People, Sir Nose D'Voidoffunk, and of course the Mothership. That's a lot of conceptualism for a strictly Funk/ R&B band.
 
The musicians who have played with P-Funk have been top notch, especially Eddie Hazel, Bernie Worrell, Bootsy Collins, Dennis Chambers, Michael Hampton, Maceo Parker, and Fred Wesley.  Also, have you ever seen P-Funk live?  They would outlast a lot of jam bands. I saw P-Funk in 1996 in Austin, and they played an almost 4 hour set!
 
 
 
Have you seen the list of Funkadelic albums I have?....It's some posts above, so there's no need to explain me how good they are as a band or as musicians individually, but that doesn't quualify them for a Prog site.
 
They can be the funkiest ever (as a fact they were) but that's not Progressive Rock, the fact that they were awesome, explorative and whatever, doesn't mean they were Prog. You seem to believe that if they are good, they should be added, that's not truth.
 
A few days ago I added a band that are simple clones of another band, I see almost no artistic merit in that, but they are Prog, so not original or even bad bands can be Prog..
 
I believe Fleetwood Mac (The poppy Buckingham & Nicks era) is one of the best bands ever, but that doesn't mean we are going to add them.
 
"if you insist on pigeonholing them strictly within the Funk/R&B genre"
 
Pigeonholing them as Funk???? Please read their name, they are called FUNKadelic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
BTW: Earth Wind & Fire has been proposed before, and the inclusion of Funkadelic would be the perfect excuse to add them.
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: Tapfret
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 18:38
I've got to side with Ivan (though not nearly as ardent in my position) on this one. despite having spacey improvs on several albums, despite having George Clinton site ELP as an influence, their music is pretty straight forward funk. Yes, they are the masters of funk. Yes it is the tastiest, thickest and most artistic funk around. And I would argue that a Funkadelic/Parliament live show is a progressive experience, much like a GWAR concert is, entertaining beyond the scope of the music.  But the addition of Funkadelic to PA would be a huge stretch in the definition of progressive.  Heck, we already have Tool and the whole electronic sub-genre stretching it paper thin. Lets pull in the reigns a little.


-------------
https://www.last.fm/user/Tapfret" rel="nofollow">
https://bandcamp.com/tapfret" rel="nofollow - Bandcamp


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 18:51
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

As I told you, the POP moniker is silly, my objection towards Funkadelic is not based in being POP because as I said before, they apply this term to almost anything and as I also said before I don't believe Funkaedic is POP.

Ivan: Just to clarify, you didn't say that in your post where you used the billboard charts, and that's what I was referring to.  You just said "'nuff said."  It wasn't for me becuase I didn't know the significance of labels there or how good a guide it is for judging the prog or prog-related worthiness of a band for PA.  I put the EDIT to indicate that I was preparing the post before you responded with the clarifications (took me more than five minutes to do that post, so I didn't see the appropriate post until after I posted).  You also had to edit yours in relation to my edit.  Though I know we've discussed the charts before, and how useful they are for evaluation here, I don't find their labelling very much help.  Others, seeing pop, would have assumed that it's pop music, and that was part of your argument.  Clearly the band was innolved in the greater rock music scene
.
But R&B they are, FUNK they are that's undeniable (BTW: IMO Supertramp is mainly POP).

It is funk, and more, and not just a case of funk, funk, funk and mo' funk.
 
And about Black albums, all the R&B, Soul, Gospel, etc albums were called Black Albums from 1969 to 1978 (If I'm not wrong about the year), stupid term but that was how it was used.
 
Iván
 
Yep I was right about the year:
 
Quote Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums is a chart published by Billboard magazine that ranks R&B and hip hop albums based on sales compiled by Nielsen SoundScan. The name of the chart was changed from Top R&B Albums in 1999. The chart debuted in the magazine as Hot R&B LPs in 1965 and were also called Top Black Albums; from 1969-1978 they were identified as Soul charts. The Billboard Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums tracks the albums of quiet storm, urban contemporary, soul music R&B, new jack swing, hip hop, and sometimes house music artists.
 
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_R&B/Hip-Hop_Albums - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_R&B/Hip-Hop_Albums


I'll quote my  EDIT when I saw your post:
"Edit: You got in as I was preparing my post. Not every P-Funk album at the charts is listed as R&B, and I'm not sure that prog-related (or even progressive rock) rock can not be strongly R&B under this site's purview."

Certianly many progressive bands in the archives have a funk element, and R&B.  It is primarily Funk of course, but I'm not convinced that a funk band can not be sufficiently on the progressive rock side, or Prog Related.  I think they're sufficiently funk-rock, and progressive, to be considerable.


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 21:13
Ivan in black, Logan in red
 
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:



You also had to edit yours in relation to my edit. 

No Logan, I edited my post at:  Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - Today at 16:19

You posted your reply at: Posted: Today at 16:50
 
Others, seeing pop, would have assumed that it's pop music, and that was part of your argument.  Clearly the band was innolved in the greater rock music scene

 
NO Logan, I am passionate in my replies, but I never played a double game...Follow my posts... since my first post I never said Funkadelic is POP, because I don't believe they are POP at all, if you want I quote my first post:
 
Iván wrote:
Quote Please guys Funkadelic  IS FUNK not Prog.
 
Funkadelic enters un the category of R&B!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
BTW: Answering a Jeopardy question about King Crimson doesn't qualify for Prog artist neither the use of synths.
 
We are crossing the line each day more.
 
Who's next.?....KC & The Sunshine Band? Or maybe Earth Wind & Fire? 
 
Iván
 
Did I ever said POP?  Please accuse me of being passionate, stubborn, but not or lying, I never lie or play double games.
 
As you see, from the start my objection was because they are a R&B / Funk band; giving them an award as POP band was like giving "The Crest of the Knave" by Jethro Tull a  Grammy.in the Heavy Metal category LOL
 
BTW: I edit almost every post (like thisone) because I make a lot of typos or gramatical mistakes that I correct.

It is funk, and more, and not just a case of funk, funk, funk and mo' funk.
 
But it's Funk, that's my point, and Funk is not Prog.
 
"Edit: You got in as I was preparing my post. Not every P-Funk album at the charts is listed as R&B, and I'm not sure that prog-related (or even progressive rock) rock can not be strongly R&B under this site's purview."
But in this case we are talking about a primarilly and almost exclusively FUNK band

Certianly many progressive bands in the archives have a funk element, and R&B.  It is primarily Funk of course, but I'm not convinced that a funk band can not be sufficiently on the progressive rock side, or Prog Related.  I think they're sufficiently funk-rock, and progressive, to be considerable.

There's a difference between being Prog and having some Funk element, than having a band called FUNKadelic which is almost exclusively FUNK.

Iván

PS: I changed the last part of your reply to red, in order to separete what you wrote from my reply.




-------------
            


Posted By: debrewguy
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 21:54
If Prog is about pushing the boundaries, what's wrong with discussing whether such a band as Funkadelic might be prog.
Ivan, one thing about the music charts is that generally speaking, if a band's main audience was black, it was listed in the R n B / Black charts (sometimes referred to as "Urban" now). And unless it really sold enough to get into the mainstream charts, that's where it stayed.
I'd like to hear from others ( not to be mean, just to see if there are more than two strongly held and knowledgeable views among PA denizens).
I do recall reading reviews about the early albums that mentioned Hendrix, Sun Ra, Psychedelia, rock / proto-metal influences and hues in the mix that Clinton put together. Maybe it's just that as "white" folk, we are too quick to dismiss anything rhythmic ( I mean in the shake your booty, dance your ass off sense, not the 11/8, or 7/4) as somehow simplistic and not deserving of recognition for the pushing out of boundaries that some of the best of them did accomplish. Heck, If Miles Davis can be here, I'd like to see an analysis of James Brown's 60s output and compare the rhythmic, melodic, contrapuntal and simple and complex interplay displayed by his music as opposed to many of our more "basic" proggers. (now if I can remember where I dug that nuclear bunker)


-------------
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.


Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 21:59
 ^ there's no doubt James Brown's band was extraordinary and could probably play almost anyone under the table, but until this becomes a progressive music site, he would be truly bizarre addition (and even then)




Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 22:46
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:

If Prog is about pushing the boundaries, what's wrong with discussing whether such a band as Funkadelic might be prog.
 
Discussing is no problem adding a non Prog band is wrong

Ivan, one thing about the music charts is that generally speaking, if a band's main audience was black, it was listed in the R n B / Black charts (sometimes referred to as "Urban" now). And unless it really sold enough to get into the mainstream charts, that's where it stayed.
 
For God's sake, they were a R&B band oriented towards Funk,,,,,BBlack Music was the name used to define R&B until 1978

I'd like to hear from others ( not to be mean, just to see if there are more than two strongly held and knowledgeable views among PA denizens).
I do recall reading reviews about the early albums that mentioned Hendrix, Sun Ra, Psychedelia, rock / proto-metal influences and hues in the mix that Clinton put together.
 
Every musician influences the oiones that come after him, Elvis Presley influenced all Rock, the Stones influebced posterior musicians even Prog, but that doesn't mean we are going to add them ubless they play music that is directly related with Progressive Rock.
 
 
Maybe it's just that as "white" folk, we are too quick to dismiss anything rhythmic ( I mean in the shake your booty, dance your ass off sense, not the 11/8, or 7/4) as somehow simplistic and not deserving of recognition for the pushing out of boundaries that some of the best of them did accomplish.
 
Are you accusing me, a Peruvian and for that reason a Latino of being racist? I believe this is Censored
 
Haven't you read I have most Funkadelic albums?
 
Do you believe latinos don't love rhythm, don't you believe I ever danced Salsa even when I don't believe there's Progressive Salsa? Do you know I'm a Ruben Blades fan and mentioned here repeatedly?
 
Better check who added OSIBISA to the Archives against the opinion of many.....You can't get more black and rhytmic than OISIBISA.
 
 
Heck, If Miles Davis can be here, I'd like to see an analysis of James Brown's 60s output and compare the rhythmic, melodic, contrapuntal and simple and complex interplay displayed by his music as opposed to many of our more "basic" proggers. (now if I can remember where I dug that nuclear bunker)
 
Miles Davis is a Fusion Musician who blended Rock and Jazz being one of the fathers of Prog Fusion, James Brwon never played a single Prog note.
 
Sadly this is what I expected happened, people is using him as a catapult to add non Prog artists.
 
Iván



-------------
            


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 00:11
Ivan, I also make many mistakes/ typos, and when my antivirus updater or other programs kick in, whole words or sometimes sentences that I type don't show up, and I don't always catch it.  Except sometimes when I'm in the typing zone, I look at the keyboard, not the screen as I'm typing (I'm fast, but when not careful, prone to errors... Silly cause I work with the typed word, and in work I'm necessarily more meticulous).
My new comments are italicised in red.

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Ivan in black, Logan in red and red italics.
 
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:


Ivan: Just to clarify, you didn't say that in your post where you used the billboard charts, and that's what I was referring to.  You just said "'nuff said."  It wasn't for me becuase I didn't know the significance of labels there or how good a guide it is for judging the prog or prog-related worthiness of a band for PA.  I put the EDIT to indicate that I was preparing the post before you responded with the clarifications (took me more than five minutes to do that post, so I didn't see the appropriate post until after I posted).  You also had to edit yours in relation to my edit.  Though I know we've discussed the charts before, and how useful they are for evaluation here, I don't find their labelling very much help.  Others, seeing pop, would have assumed that it's pop music, and that was part of your argument.  Clearly the band was innolved in the greater rock music scene

No Logan, I edited my post at:  Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - Today at 16:19

The post I was referring to was Yesterday at 17:18, five minutes before I responded 9with the post with EDIT written in it.  I was trying to explain about my one where I used chart examples before reading your post.

You posted your reply at: Posted: Today at 16:50

The  post I was referring to i posted at
17:23Sorry if I didn't make that clear.
 
"Others, seeing pop, would have assumed that it's pop music, and that [that] was part of your argument.  Clearly the band was involved in the greater rock music scene.  I thought that would be clearer if I added the whole paragraph (you only quoted part)"

 
NO Logan, I am passionate in my replies, but I never played a double game...Follow my posts... since my first post I never said Funkadelic is POP, because I don't believe they are POP at all, if you want I quote my first post:

Never meant to imply that you had claimed it was pop, that was a grammatical error on my part -- one "that" was missing.  I meant that by posting the chart which shows pop, others who don't know how they use "pop" might assume that that was part of your argument (I missed the extra that).  They might wrongly assume that part of your claim for their archives unworthiness is because it is being called pop.


 
Iván wrote:
Quote Please guys Funkadelic  IS FUNK not Prog.
 
Funkadelic enters un the category of R&B!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
BTW: Answering a Jeopardy question about King Crimson doesn't qualify for Prog artist neither the use of synths.
 
We are crossing the line each day more.
 
Who's next.?....KC & The Sunshine Band? Or maybe Earth Wind & Fire? 
 
Iván
 
Did I ever said POP?  Please accuse me of being passionate, stubborn, but not or lying, I never lie or play double games.

It was the chart that said pop.  I don't go around accusing people of lying -- better to assume that it's an honest mistake or miscommunication.
 
As you see, from the start my objection was because they are a R&B / Funk band; giving them an award as POP band was like giving "The Crest of the Knave" by Jethro Tull a  Grammy.in the Heavy Metal category LOL
 
BTW: I edit almost every post (like thisone) because I make a lot of typos or gramatical mistakes that I correct.

Me too, just thought your edit was in response to my edit which I made after seeing your post after you "Streudelled" me (a term we used for such posts at another board that got in too fast that it invalidated, or made redundant one's own response).



It is funk, and more, and not just a case of funk, funk, funk and mo' funk.
 
But it's Funk, that's my point, and Funk is not Prog.

At that same board where we would Streudel each other, I was called Funk (or the Funkster) -- so I can't help but imagine you're calling me not Prog.  I've just thought of them having a progressive funk-rock phase.
 
"Edit: You got in as I was preparing my post. Not every P-Funk album at the charts is listed as R&B, and I'm not sure that prog-related (or even progressive rock) rock can not be strongly R&B under this site's purview."
But in this case we are talking about a primarilly and almost exclusively FUNK band

I just thought the psyche infleunce and rock elements more significant even though it is a primarily funk band (maybe THE funk band -- it certainly is one funked up motherfunkin funk band).

Certianly many progressive bands in the archives have a funk element, and R&B.  It is primarily Funk of course, but I'm not convinced that a funk band can not be sufficiently on the progressive rock side, or Prog Related.  I think they're sufficiently funk-rock, and progressive, to be considerable.

There's a difference between being Prog and having some Funk element, than having a band called FUNKadelic which is almost exclusively FUNK.

Here's a quote from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funk - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funk

Originally posted by wikipedia wikipedia wrote:


1970s and P-Funk

In the 1970s, a new group of musicians further developed the "funk rock" approach innovated by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Clinton_%28funk_musician%29 - George Clinton , with his main bands http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_%28band%29 - Parliament and, later, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funkadelic - Funkadelic . Together, they produced a new kind of funk sound heavily influenced by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jazz - jazz and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychedelic_rock - psychedelic rock . The two groups had members in common and often are referred to singly as "Parliament-Funkadelic." The breakout popularity of Parliament-Funkadelic gave rise to the term " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-Funk - P-Funk ," which referred to the music by George Clinton's bands, and defined a new subgenre.

"P-funk" also came to mean something in its quintessence, of superior quality, or sui generis, as in the lyrics from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-Funk_%28Wants_to_Get_Funked_Up%29 - P-Funk (Wants to Get Funked Up) " a hit single from Parliament's album " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mothership_Connection - Mothership Connection ":

So it's not altogether different from jazz-rock fusion.  If we didn't have jazz-rock here, I wouldn't be so keen on funk rock artists.

Iván

PS: I changed the last part of your reply to red, in order to separete what you wrote from my reply.




Some further edits of no real substance... But goes back to miscommunication issues (not your fault, me not being clear enough).  I thought you usually tried to quote everything, and not just snippets, otherwise context can be lost.


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 00:38

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Ivan, I also make many mistakes/ typos, and when my antivirus updater or other programs kick in, whole words or sometimes sentences that I type don't show up, and I don't always catch it.  Except sometimes when I'm in the typing zone, I look at the keyboard, not the screen as I'm typing (I'm fast, but when not careful, prone to errors... Silly cause I work with the typed word, and in work I'm necessarily more meticulous).
My new comments are italicised in red.

Yes, it's silly, specially  for a lawyer that types all day. Wink


Others, seeing pop, would have assumed that it's pop music, and that [that] was part of your argument.  Clearly the band was involved in the greater rock music scene

 
NO Logan, it wasn't part of my argument, I clearly stated that my objection was for the R&B/Funk elements

Never meant to imply that you had claimed it was pop, that was a grammatical error on my part -- one "that" was missing.  I meant that by posting the chart which shows pop, others who don't know how they use "pop" might assume that that was part of your argument (I missed the extra that).  They might wrongly assume that part of your claim for their archives unworthiness is because it is being called pop.

Don't worry, but again, I only copied all the Billboard awaeds they earned.
 

Me too, just thought your edit was in response to my edit which I made after seeing your post after you "Streudelled" me (a term we used for such posts at another board that got in too fast that it invalidated, or made redundant one's own response).
 
I understand Logan, but as you saw, my edit was posted before your second post.


At that same board where we would Streudel each other, I was called Funk (or the Funkster) -- so I can't help but imagine you're calling me not Prog.  I've just thought of them having a progressive funk-rock phase.
 
I don't qualify people for what they listen, I listen a lot of music bedsides Prog.
 
I just thought the psyche infleunce and rock elements more significant even though it is a primarily funk band (maybe THE funk band -- it certainly is one funked up motherfunkin funk band).

Yes, they had some Psyche elements but again, we are talking mainly about a R&B/Funk band, and you should remember that not all Psychedelic bands are Prog Related, there are thousands that are not and will never be listed here.

Here's a quote from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funk - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funk

Originally posted by wikipedia wikipedia wrote:


1970s and P-Funk

In the 1970s, a new group of musicians further developed the "funk rock" approach innovated by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Clinton_%28funk_musician%29 - George Clinton , with his main bands http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_%28band%29 - Parliament and, later, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funkadelic - Funkadelic . Together, they produced a new kind of funk sound heavily influenced by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jazz - jazz and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychedelic_rock - psychedelic rock . The two groups had members in common and often are referred to singly as "Parliament-Funkadelic." The breakout popularity of Parliament-Funkadelic gave rise to the term " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-Funk - P-Funk ," which referred to the music by George Clinton's bands, and defined a new subgenre.

"P-funk" also came to mean something in its quintessence, of superior quality, or sui generis, as in the lyrics from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-Funk_%28Wants_to_Get_Funked_Up%29 - P-Funk (Wants to Get Funked Up) " a hit single from Parliament's album " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mothership_Connection - Mothership Connection ":

So it's not altogether different from jazz-rock fusion.  If we didn't have jazz-rock here, I wouldn't be so keen on funk rock artists.

You know what I think about Wikipedia, I trust more in what I listen, they were a fantastic Funk band, wuith some strange elements to their genre, but nothing else.
 
Nobody denies that P-Funk is a superior band, but superior is not a synonymous of Prog, remember P-Funk stands for Parliament Funkadelic not for Prog Funk.
 
The problem with Jazz Fusion is huge already, people can't define where the simple blend of Rock and Jazz ends and where the ¨Jazz-Prog Rock blend starts, anyway, Prog Jazz Fusion is a recognized genre, bands as Mahavishnu or musicians as Jean Luc Ponty are clearly Prog, that's not the case of one single Funk band that has some Psyche (non Prog) elements.

Iván




-------------
            


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 01:08
I'm Streudelled again.  Was called away on family business, and wanted to clarify some minor matters that I must not have been clear enough on, so edited too late. " I understand Logan, but as you saw, my edit was posted before your second post." A bit late late so mind a bit slow, but it looks like I was referring to a different post.  See above.

"Yes, it's silly, specially  for a lawyer that types all day." I work with post-graduate students, and I have to spend a ton of time going through theses.  What's really ridiculous is that i often work through the night typing, and I'm still typing at a message board when I'm not working, or taking care of my children.  Seriously, that is so wrong.  I spend way too much time at the computer (something I plan to change), and my family and social life does suffer for it.

I wanted to respond to all your points, but I am brain-dead (usually by about two hours after my morning coffee).


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: russellk
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 01:49
This debate is another example of the confusion that arises when prog (genre) is confused with 'progressive' (adjective). Parliament/Funkadelic are a fabulous example of progressive music, but they are not prog. To include every progressive music act will lead to the addition of everyone from Hank Williams to Stravinsky.

As a general rule, I'd suggest we limit ourselves to progressive (adjective) music acts that had their progressive period during or after the 'classic prog' period of the early 1970s.


Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 01:57
 ^ except that was the Progressive Age, a time when almost every artist was playing, flirting with or taking from Prog Rock because of what the musicians were doing and because it was, for a brief moment, popular enough to sell records   ..in fact I can think of few pop artists between 69 and 75 that didn't do some sort of theme or prog-style album


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 02:07
Okay, I'll have a go.

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Ivan, I also make many mistakes/ typos, and when my antivirus updater or other programs kick in, whole words or sometimes sentences that I type don't show up, and I don't always catch it.  Except sometimes when I'm in the typing zone, I look at the keyboard, not the screen as I'm typing (I'm fast, but when not careful, prone to errors... Silly cause I work with the typed word, and in work I'm necessarily more meticulous).
My new comments are italicised in red.

Yes, it's silly, specially  for a lawyer that types all day. Wink


Others, seeing pop, would have assumed that it's pop music, and that [that] was part of your argument.  Clearly the band was involved in the greater rock music scene

 
NO Logan, it wasn't part of my argument, I clearly stated that my objection was for the R&B/Funk elements

Never meant to imply that you had claimed it was pop, that was a grammatical error on my part -- one "that" was missing.  I meant that by posting the chart which shows pop, others who don't know how they use "pop" might assume that that was part of your argument (I missed the extra that).  They might wrongly assume that part of your claim for their archives unworthiness is because it is being called pop.

Don't worry, but again, I only copied all the Billboard awaeds they earned.
 

Me too, just thought your edit was in response to my edit which I made after seeing your post after you "Streudelled" me (a term we used for such posts at another board that got in too fast that it invalidated, or made redundant one's own response).
 
I understand Logan, but as you saw, my edit was posted before your second post. 

Apparently I had not made it clear which post I was referring to.



At that same board where we would Streudel each other, I was called Funk (or the Funkster) -- so I can't help but imagine you're calling me not Prog.  I've just thought of them having a progressive funk-rock phase.
 
I don't qualify people for what they listen, I listen a lot of music bedsides Prog.

The P-Funk influence became a big part of my persona elsewhere.  Actually, I was very into funk a few years before getting back into Prog.  I tend to prefer funky prog to funk these days.
 
I just thought the psyche infleunce and rock elements more significant even though it is a primarily funk band (maybe THE funk band -- it certainly is one funked up motherfunkin funk band).

Yes, they had some Psyche elements but again, we are talking mainly about a R&B/Funk band, and you should remember that not all Psychedelic bands are Prog Related, there are thousands that are not and will never be listed here.

Of course a great many will never be listed here, though I expect more to be included in the future that were dismissed before.

Here's a quote from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funk - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funk

Originally posted by wikipedia wikipedia wrote:


1970s and P-Funk

In the 1970s, a new group of musicians further developed the "funk rock" approach innovated by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Clinton_%28funk_musician%29 - George Clinton , with his main bands http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_%28band%29 - Parliament and, later, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funkadelic - Funkadelic . Together, they produced a new kind of funk sound heavily influenced by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jazz - jazz and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychedelic_rock - psychedelic rock . The two groups had members in common and often are referred to singly as "Parliament-Funkadelic." The breakout popularity of Parliament-Funkadelic gave rise to the term " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-Funk - P-Funk ," which referred to the music by George Clinton's bands, and defined a new subgenre.

"P-funk" also came to mean something in its quintessence, of superior quality, or sui generis, as in the lyrics from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-Funk_%28Wants_to_Get_Funked_Up%29 - P-Funk (Wants to Get Funked Up) " a hit single from Parliament's album " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mothership_Connection - Mothership Connection ":

So it's not altogether different from jazz-rock fusion.  If we didn't have jazz-rock here, I wouldn't be so keen on funk rock artists.

You know what I think about Wikipedia, I trust more in what I listen, they were a fantastic Funk band, wuith some strange elements to their genre, but nothing else.

Me too, but my opinion is based on how I hear the music, not on what others say.  Perhaps one reason why I associate them with Prog is because Jimi Hendrix was an influence (especially on a guitairst), and when i was young I thought of Hendrix as a kind of progressive rock (hell, I still do).
 
Nobody denies that P-Funk is a superior band, but superior is not a synonymous of Prog, remember P-Funk stands for Parliament Funkadelic not for Prog Funk.

Good one! LOL  Of course being good does not equal prog (though I wish being progressive was more important in Prog).
 
The problem with Jazz Fusion is huge already, people can't define where the simple blend of Rock and Jazz ends and where the ¨Jazz-Prog Rock blend starts, anyway, Prog Jazz Fusion is a recognized genre, bands as Mahavishnu or musicians as Jean Luc Ponty are clearly Prog, that's not the case of one single Funk band that has some Psyche (non Prog) elements.

Well, that's true. 

Anyway, perhaps one day we'll get my wish for a Progressive Funk-Rock tag here though -- well if we do bring in more complete multi-tagging for albums (yes, like at Mike's site), funk should be an option.

Iván




Incidentally, for all you funkin' P-Funkers, here is an interesting documentary in three parts (below are hyperlinks):

Part One: http://www.imeem.com/groups/-_2p_awQ/video/We_Pe9fD/parliament_funkadelic_parliament_funkadelic_one_nation_und/ - "Parliament Funkadelic: One Nat..."
Part Two: http://www.imeem.com/groups/-_2p_awQ/video/4v7neNPP/parliament_funkadelic_parliament_funkadelic_one_nation_und/ - "Parliament Funkadelic: One Nat..."
Part Three: http://www.imeem.com/groups/-_2p_awQ/video/vatOBzau/parliament_funkadelic_parliament_funkadelic_one_nation_un/ - " Parliament Funkadelic: One Na..."

-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 03:01
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by russellk russellk wrote:

This debate is another example of the confusion that arises when prog (genre) is confused with 'progressive' (adjective). Parliament/Funkadelic are a fabulous example of progressive music, but they are not prog. To include every progressive music act will lead to the addition of everyone from Hank Williams to Stravinsky.

As a general rule, I'd suggest we limit ourselves to progressive (adjective) music acts that had their progressive period during or after the 'classic prog' period of the early 1970s.


^ except that was the Progressive Age, a time when almost every artist was playing, flirting with or taking from Prog Rock because of what the musicians were doing and because it was, for a brief moment, popular enough to sell records   ..in fact I can think of few pop artists between 69 and 75 that didn't do some sort of theme or prog-style album


I'm well aware of the difference between progressive (adjective) music and Prog (noun) and have mentioned that difference a great mnay times myself. Of course, the Funkadelic progressive period we're discussing was during the 70's.  P-Funk was influenced by progressive rock, flirted with it at the least, and of course flirted with themes.  Surely inspired by Sun Ra (and incidentally, Magma also flirted with somewhat similar themes). As David says, not uncommon. 

The late 60s to 70s was a time for great experimentation and progressive music-making across many genres.

Here's an interesting, and amusing if you don't know it, article on the mythology of Parliament: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_Funk_mythology - http://en.wikipedia.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_Funk_mythology - /wiki/P_Funk_mythology

Quote

Parliament

On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mothership_Connection - Mothership Connection (1975), the first track, "P Funk", concerns a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disc_jockey - DJ character, who inspired the Lollypop Man (alias the Long Haired Sucker). According to Clinton (who shares credit for the song with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Worrell - Bernie Worrell and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootsy_Collins - Bootsy Collins ), he was frustrated that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio - radio stations refused to play his songs and invented his own station (called W-E-F-U-N-K) and a DJ to man it.

On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mothership_Connection - Mothership Connection (1975), Starchild first appeared (inspired equally by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Ra - Sun Ra 's " http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Noah&action=edit&redlink=1 - Black Noah " and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus - Jesus ); he is a divine alien being, who came to earth from a spaceship (his arrival is "the Mothership Connection") to bring the holy Funk (with a capital "F": the cause of creation and source of energy and all life), to humanity. As it turns out (according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Clones_of_Dr._Funkenstein - The Clones of Dr. Funkenstein , 1976), Starchild secretly worked for Dr. Funkenstein, the intergalactic master of outer space Funk, who is capable of fixing all of man’s ills, because the "bigger the headache, the bigger the pill" and he’s the "big pill" (" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Funkenstein - Dr. Funkenstein ," from The Clones of Dr. Funkenstein). Dr. Funkenstein’s predecessors had encoded the secrets of Funk in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramids - Pyramids because humanity wasn’t ready for its existence until the modern era. The titular "clones" are the Children of Productions whose job is to ensure that everyone is on the One.

Starchild’s nemesis is Sir Nose D’Voidoffunk ("Sir Nose Devoid of Funk" from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funkentelechy_Vs._the_Placebo_Syndrome - Funkentelechy Vs. the Placebo Syndrome , 1977). Inspired by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pinocchio_Theory - The Pinocchio Theory of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootsys_Rubber_Band - Bootsy's Rubber Band , Sir Nose attempts to end the Funk because he is too cool to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dance - dance . He is the master of the Placebo Syndrome, which causes unFunkiness (a combination of stupidity and no dancing). His goal is to place the minds of all humanity into a state called the Zone of Zero Funkativity. Starchild, on the other hand, uses his Bop Gun (" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bop_Gun_%28Endangered_Species%29 - Bop Gun (Endangered Species) ," from Funkentelechy Vs the Placebo Syndrome) to achieve Funk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entelechy - entelechy for all humanity. With the Funky powers of the Bop Gun (which are augmented by the Flash Light....Shine the light on them suckas!!!), Starchild causes Sir Nose to reach Funkentelechy, and find his Funky soul. He then dances away the night.

Sir Nose’s return (along with ally Rumpofsteelskin) is detailed on the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_Booty_Affair - Motor Booty Affair (1978). Here, Sir Nose is too cool to dance or swim, but Mr. Wiggles and the good citizens of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantis - Atlantis (a place where one can swim underwater without getting wet) cause Sir Nose to dance the Aqua Boogie.

On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloryhallastoopid - Gloryhallastoopid (1979), Clinton flips the script on "Theme From The Black Hole" (later sampled by Digital Underground for "Same Song") and allows Sir Nose to win one battle by turning Star Child into a mule (the bad guy winning in the end?). Sir Nose’s machinations are undone three tracks later by the Big Bang Theory, which reveals that the Funk caused the creation of the universe, though the only legible clue is the etheral backing vocal line, "So we the clones were designed."

Sir Nose’s last appearance is on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trombipulation - Trombipulation (1979), where he traces his ancestry back to the Cro-Nasal Sapiens, who were especially Funky, leading Sir Nose to reclaim his Funky heritage, along with his son, Sir Nose Jr.

...

Fun stuff.

And

Quote

Funkadelic

Funkadelic albums are rather more ethereal and abstract when compared to Parliament’s. Rather than tell the story of a cast of characters, the mythology of Funkadelic is a socially conscious spiritualism.

The Funk is described on the very first song (" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mommy,_Whats_a_Funkadelic%3F - Mommy, What's a Funkadelic? ") of the very first Funkadelic album ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funkadelic_%28album%29 - Funkadelic , 1970), in the lines "... my name is Funk/I am not of your world/Hold still, baby, I won't do you no harm/I think I'll be good to you".

On the second album, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Your_Mind..._And_Your_Ass_Will_Follow - Free Your Mind... And Your Ass Will Follow (1971), Funk is said to lead to the Kingdom of heaven, which is described as being "within" (the titular song). " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funky_Dollar_Bill - Funky Dollar Bill " (off the same album) describes multiple unFunky priorities, all revolving around materialism and consumerism, which have taken over all that is good and true in society (including, on " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eulogy_and_Light - Eulogy and Light ," religion).

One central concept is Maggot Brain ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maggot_Brain - Maggot Brain , 1971), which is an unenlightened small-mindedness, and which must be overcome for humanity to avoid its destruction and decay. It is explicitly ascribed to the titular junkie in "Super Stupid," who has "lost the fight" with fear. Other songs on the album advocate universal love, peace, and brotherhood, and war is explicitly compared to insanity in "Back In Our Minds." The album ends on an apocalyptic note with "Wars of Armageddon," in which the sound of a crying baby can be taken as a direct reference to the speech at the beginning of the title track: "Mother Earth is pregnant for the third time, for y'all have knocked her up." With its noisy improvisation and activist chanting, the track appears to depict a final confrontation between good and evil.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Nation_Under_a_Groove - One Nation Under a Groove (Funkadelic, 1978) introduces Funkadelica, a nation wherein the Funk rules and can’t be either stopped or labeled. The people of Funkadelica are called Funkateers (as are P Funk fans) and are led by Uncle Jam. Their mission is to rescue dance music from the doldrums (unFunkiness).

The album http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Electric_Spanking_of_War_Babies - The Electric Spanking of War Babies (1981) refers to the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War - Vietnam War , as characterized by George Clinton.


Now, I'm not saying that P-Funk should be here; I'm just saying that it warrants exploration.  There is merit, I feel, in the notion of P-Funk's inclusion.  It's a fun discussion at the least (well fun for me).



-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: russellk
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 05:43
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

 ^ except that was the Progressive Age, a time when almost every artist was playing, flirting with or taking from Prog Rock because of what the musicians were doing and because it was, for a brief moment, popular enough to sell records   ..in fact I can think of few pop artists between 69 and 75 that didn't do some sort of theme or prog-style album


Absolutely, which is why I said 'during or after'. Or am I not understanding your point?


Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 06:12
my point was that even a restriction to only add artists that did prog during that time (or after) would still be problematic as the majority of acts had a 'progressive' period or release; Cat Stevens, Isaac Hayes, Kiss, many others that would be intriguing but confusing additions









Posted By: russellk
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 07:32
^OK, fair enough. But, given we allow progressive (adjective) acts, your summation is what we have. So I don't really see how, on the basis of logic alone, we can discriminate to keep any progressive band out. Not that I want that situation - far from it! As much as I enjoy this site's inclusiveness - I still care far more about discovering new music than I do about defending some notion of prog purity - I'd hate to see true prog acts overwhelmed by acts whose claim for inclusion is a whiff of originality.

I'm still thinking this through, so forgive me if my thoughts seem half baked ...


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 07:44
god I love these threads LOL

-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: russellk
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 07:53
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

god I love these threads LOL


I'm sure everyone does. What's not to love? Smile


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 07:56
Originally posted by russellk russellk wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

god I love these threads LOL


I'm sure everyone does. What's not to love? Smile

Clap




-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 08:06
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by russellk russellk wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

god I love these threads LOL


I'm sure everyone does. What's not to love? Smile

Clap



well I love that traditional colors like blue, red and black are used...another member once replied within a reply using the color pink, and my eyes were done for...LOL


-------------


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 08:09
Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by russellk russellk wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

god I love these threads LOL


I'm sure everyone does. What's not to love? Smile

Clap



well I love that traditional colors like blue, red and black are used...another member once replied within a reply using the color pink, and my eyes were done for...LOL


yeah.. honest to God.. some of those quote pyramids can actually put me in the Xmas spirit.. they can look like f**king Christmas trees LOL


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Rivertree
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 09:01
Clap  Ahhhhh! Maggot Brain (the song) - psychedelic pure - but the rest???

-------------
https://awesomeprog.com/users/Rivertree" rel="nofollow">



Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 09:39
The prog-rock part of Funkadelic and Parliament is multi-kybdst Bernie Worrell who remains active in prog related activities to this day. He's a fan of Keith Emerson and can match Emerson and any other prog kybdst for classical, jazz and rock technique.

Funny how EW&F is being held up as the bad end of this addition tendency, early EW&F is probably more progressive than P-funk, as well as lot's of bands already on this site. My three favorite all-time prog rock concerts are Crimson, Genesis and EW&F. I consider RnB to be part of rock, just my personal tastes.

You'll add or don't add whoever you like, I don't care, it's a fun site.

P.S. James Brown's introduction of music composed of interlocking melodic parts (a concept he 'borrowed' from Cuban jazz) as opposed to chords and melodies was very progressive and after passing through some other artists eventually became a big influence (possibly unconsciously) on King Crimson, Gentle Giant, Yes (especially Squire) and others.

P.S. P.S. In retrospect, I think the three previously mentioned classic prog bands borrowed directly from James, just listen to Fripp and Howe's comping technique.


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 09:48
^ very true John Clap

-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 11:55
Just a silly little thing to leave my intgrity clear, not for your post, but for what people may believe from this:
 
Logan wrote:
Quote The  post I was referring to i posted at 17:23Sorry if I didn't make that clear
 
Again, my previous post was edited at 17:21, two minutes before you posted your's, I never change a post to fit with a  reply, that would be dishonest, like saying "I knew that, look at my post"
 
And if II ever change a post after a reply (not in this case as you can verify) it's because typos.
 
Thanks
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 12:25
Never mind, Ivan, in all the quotes I got a bit confused (I hadn't meant it in a bad way at all, actually in a good way in terms of intent, but it wasn't really relevant to the discussion anyway -- apologies).  I tend to write in a different manner, replying more to the general gist than individual points (otherwise it can get overly nit-picky, and sometimes the thrust/ key points are lost in it).  Sometimes editing one's post can be gracious (that one had missed pertinent info and address that.  When someone edits their content and I've responded in the meantime, I often edit mine as a way of acknowledging the edits... flows better, and can be a gracious act), though best to say one edited it commonly (discussion should not be a contest, of course).  I used to like to think of posts as being works in progress -- sometimes improving on them over time, as one does an essay (provided one doesn't change context if others respond -- works better for self-contained essay type posts, or my favourite kind of writing -- coming up with silly stories).  I suppose at this site that it's rarer for posts to be islands unto themselves than at other places I've frequented.

Anyway, back to the topic:

Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

The prog-rock part of Funkadelic and Parliament is multi-kybdst Bernie Worrel who remains active in prog related activities to this day. He's a fan of Keith Emerson and can match Emerson and any other prog kybdst for classical, jazz and rock technique.

Funny how EW&F is being held up as the bad end of this addition tendency, early EW&F is probably more progressive than P-funk, as well as lot's of bands already on this site. My three favorite all-time prog rock concerts are Crimson, Genesis and EW&F. I consider RnB to be rock, just my personal tastes.

You'll add or don't add whoever you like, I don't care, it's a fun site.

P.S. James Brown's introduction of music composed of interlocking melodic parts (a concept he 'borrowed' from Cuban jazz) as opposed to chords and melodies was very progressive and after passing through some other artists eventually became a big influence (possibly unconsciously) on King Crimson, Gentle Giant, Yes (especially Squire) and others.


That is an interesting post, and nothing to add.  Incidentally, as with rock, I think of R&B as part of rock and roll generally.  I'm not that knowledgable when it comes to distinctions (me being a music lover and not a music historian or music academic).  Great that you mentioned the keyboardist.


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 13:28
There's nothing wrong with discussing these things but I'd like to propose a new category:

Progressive Leemoresilly...


Sums things up perfectly.


Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 13:38
Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

There's nothing wrong with discussing these things but I'd like to propose a new category:Progressive Leemoresilly...Sums things up perfectly.


Is that where Journey and Chicago are going...ha ha...just kidding.


Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 13:50
I've an idea to just add every band that ever released an album.

However the Allmusic Guide beat us to it.

Here's an idea, just add "progressive" to every musical genre and we can find an excuse to include everyone!

Progressive Soul. Progressive Rhythm and Blues. Progressive Punk. Progressive funk. Progressive Country, Progressive Disco.






Posted By: memowakeman
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 13:54
^^ Actually all of those progressive genres may exist, look at this:
 
Progressive country is a subgenre of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country_music - country music started in the early 1970s in Austin, Texas. The term was coined by programmers at Austin's KOKE-FM in 1972 as a way to differentiate the style of country music in Austin from that being made in Nashville. Progressive country music, also known as "redneck rock," was strongly influenced by a variety of "hard" country music styles, including western swing, honky tonk, and the Bakersfield Sound.
 
There is even something called "progressive salsa" LOLConfused


-------------

Follow me on twitter @memowakeman


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 13:58
Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

I've an idea to just add every band that ever released an album.

However the Allmusic Guide beat us to it.

Here's an idea, just add "progressive" to every musical genre and we can find an excuse to include everyone!

Progressive Soul. Progressive Rhythm and Blues. Progressive Punk. Progressive funk. Progressive Country, Progressive Disco.


That's very progressive of you! Clap Wink I draw the line at progressive "boy bands".  Now let's get the Spice Girls added.


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 14:01
I'll bring Progressive Manele. There's just no match between this national music of ours and the classics of Prog!

-------------


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 14:02
Originally posted by memowakeman memowakeman wrote:

 
There is even something called "progressive salsa" LOLConfused
 
That was rather funny.
 
When Ruben Blades released his album "Buscando America" which is OUTSTANDING, some Progfans that I know, who always hated Salsa, started to call Ruben Blades Music Prog Salsa, because they liked it (who doesn't), but they were ashamed of liking Salsa, so with the prefix Prog, it wasn't so embarrassing.
 
But the truth is that Ruben Blades, no matter the excellent music and even better lyrics, was playing some sort of elaborate Latin Jazz, nothing more (Hey, he played with Peter Gabriel in the Amnesty International tours).
 
Some people called Juan Luis Guerra Prog Salsa because he said he listened Yes and Genesis, but again people was wrong, it was good Merengue.
 
Normally this kind of Prog genres are invented by Progheads who are ashamed of luistening anything that is not Prog, so they re-baptize their favorite band's genre with Prog in front.
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 14:16
Just for the record, I never proposed adding any bands or artists to PA, as was stated in my initial post..

My aim, as always, was to 'stimulate' the conversation.






"Stimulate, don't simulate."


Posted By: Rivertree
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 14:25
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Just for the record, I never proposed adding any bands or artists to PA, as was stated in my initial post..

My aim, as always, was to 'stimulate' the conversation.


"Stimulate, don't simulate."



Hahahaha - very successful indeed  LOL



-------------
https://awesomeprog.com/users/Rivertree" rel="nofollow">



Posted By: Tapfret
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 20:32
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:


That's very progressive of you! Clap Wink I draw the line at progressive "boy bands".  Now let's get the Spice Girls added.


I would eat a light bulb if I heard the Spice Girls covering Knots.
Or some prog boy bands like "New Trolls on the Block"



-------------
https://www.last.fm/user/Tapfret" rel="nofollow">
https://bandcamp.com/tapfret" rel="nofollow - Bandcamp


Posted By: debrewguy
Date Posted: September 07 2008 at 14:23
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

 ^ there's no doubt James Brown's band was extraordinary and could probably play almost anyone under the table, but until this becomes a progressive music site, he would be truly bizarre addition (and even then)



True, but it is nice to have threads where we can debate and discuss musical efforts that can be shown to turn up in later "accepted" prog releases (see Easy Money's linking Brown and Gentle Giant) .
I do accept though, that too often suggestions are posited as being cut & dried and obvious to everybody that the group in question be included in PA's list. And the naysayers often object as if it was an infinite stretch to barely even begin to think about possibly discussing the limited prog qualifications a group may have.
We've seen Bowie, Steely Dan, Miles Davis,  Black Sabbath added these past few months. In Davis' & Sabbath's case, there was a very lengthy debate as to their worthiness. But looking back, (despite my initial questioning Davis' inclusion) I think the site has really just been made more interesting.
The reason - maybe PA is becoming the destination of choice for those who believe there is still much out there that could be of interest to a prog music fan, depending on your preferred genres of course.
Progressive Pop, eventually. Why not ... no rush, as there are still other issues that our community is working through.


-------------
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 07 2008 at 15:02
DG: Discussing a band is necessary, even if it's not Prog, but adding them is a different issue, you say some additions have encouraged some people, but I received at least 10 PMs and comments from visitoirs asking me why in hell determined band has been added.
 
I'm part of a Prog community in Lima of modest 70 members, most of them in their 30's and 40's, most of them are afraid of the path PA is taking.
 
I believe our target audience is the proghead, not the lurker who will come for a band and probably won't stay, and believe me, I know at leasr three persons who left this place, not for SD but for previous additions, and this were people who used PA as their maun source of Prog information.
 
But, that's my opinion.
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: fusionfreak
Date Posted: September 07 2008 at 15:26
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

I've an idea to just add every band that ever released an album.

However the Allmusic Guide beat us to it.

Here's an idea, just add "progressive" to every musical genre and we can find an excuse to include everyone!

Progressive Soul. Progressive Rhythm and Blues. Progressive Punk. Progressive funk. Progressive Country, Progressive Disco.


That's very progressive of you! Clap Wink I draw the line at progressive "boy bands".  Now let's get the Spice Girls added.
Logan If you did so I could add 2Be3 from my own country alongside with Alliage and Worlds Apart.Actually 2Be3 would suffice since they're the King Crimson of Progressive boy bandsDead

-------------
I was born in the land of Mahavishnu,not so far from Kobaia.I'm looking for the world

of searchers with the help from

crimson king


Posted By: fusionfreak
Date Posted: September 07 2008 at 15:43
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

DG: Discussing a band is necessary, even if it's not Prog, but adding them is a different issue, you say some additions have encouraged some people, but I received at least 10 PMs and comments from visitoirs asking me why in hell determined band has been added.
 
I'm part of a Prog community in Lima of modest 70 members, most of them in their 30's and 40's, most of them are afraid of the path PA is taking.
 
I believe our target audience is the proghead, not the lurker who will come for a band and probably won't stay, and believe me, I know at leasr three persons who left this place, not for SD but for previous additions, and this were people who used PA as their maun source of Prog information.
 
But, that's my opinion.
 
Iván
 Ivan I'm not really familiar with Funkadelic but I listened to some of their stuff and it's good so no questions regarding their qualities but it's not really prog since it does not suffice to play crazy music
to qualify as prog however Bernie Worell often played with Bill Laswell and Praxis or dub/space/fusion
outfits so he can be prog related.Moreover as prog and music lovers we have to stay open minded
to good music.But you're right when saying that PA is becoming too much non prog friendly and I have
various examples regardin prog contamination by pop's dictatorsh*t:Last year I was with a friend at a Jethro Tull concert,it was great and a week later we
came across people we know.They also went to the concert(they didn't know prog rock) and we asked
them if they liked and they answered:"No it was too poppy!".To conclude I would say it's wiser to debate
through the forum rather than leave it.Peace,Love and Prog to everybody!I'm returning to wonderful Isola
di Niente! 


-------------
I was born in the land of Mahavishnu,not so far from Kobaia.I'm looking for the world

of searchers with the help from

crimson king


Posted By: akin
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 17:00
I am not familiar with Funkadelic albums, just sparse songs, so I can't give an opinion concerning the band.

But, on the other hand, I think it is interesting to see how the subject of what is prog is taking dangerous routes inside this site. The first mistake was to change Progressive Rock to a coined term Progressive Music, which is not widely accepted and was rarely used outside PA scope.

This was created specially to justify Prog Metal to those who do not think that Prog Metal is prog. But then, it created an excuse for adding heavy metal (the term metal alone does not apply to musical genres) that is not related with the "common prog", by saying that to be prog in Prog Metal is different than to be prog in "common prog". If this is true, we have to start dealing with Prog Country, Prog Bluegrass, Prog Trance, Prog Hip-Hop, etc, afterall, to be prog in Prog Country is different to be prog in "common prog".

All this to say that if Funkadelic is "common prog", it should be judged by its own merits and be added. But if we start talking about Prog Funk, it is dangerous to the site. The same can be applied to other bands, for example, Stranglers and Prog Punk, just to name a recurring band in discussions that can fit in the same case.

I know that the Prog Metal lobby is very strong in this site because Prog Metal is more fashionable than Prog Rock nowadays and many site users are only Prog Metal fans or discovered Prog Rock because of Prog Metal. But their decision of separating Prog Metal concept from "common prog" was harmful to the site, because theoretically every other Prog "genre" I mentioned should have the same power here. Imagine IF this happens, how many bands would we have?


Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 17:09
if what your saying, akin, is that each artist should be judged and added on its own merits rather than if it does or does not 'fit' within a certain genre, I agree.  However, I don't think ProgMetal is any more separate from 'common prog' than JazzRock Fusion, Electronic, or Post/Math is






Posted By: akin
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 17:10
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

The prog-rock part of Funkadelic and Parliament is multi-kybdst Bernie Worrell who remains active in prog related activities to this day. He's a fan of Keith Emerson and can match Emerson and any other prog kybdst for classical, jazz and rock technique.

Funny how EW&F is being held up as the bad end of this addition tendency, early EW&F is probably more progressive than P-funk, as well as lot's of bands already on this site. My three favorite all-time prog rock concerts are Crimson, Genesis and EW&F. I consider RnB to be part of rock, just my personal tastes.

You'll add or don't add whoever you like, I don't care, it's a fun site.

P.S. James Brown's introduction of music composed of interlocking melodic parts (a concept he 'borrowed' from Cuban jazz) as opposed to chords and melodies was very progressive and after passing through some other artists eventually became a big influence (possibly unconsciously) on King Crimson, Gentle Giant, Yes (especially Squire) and others.

P.S. P.S. In retrospect, I think the three previously mentioned classic prog bands borrowed directly from James, just listen to Fripp and Howe's comping technique.


The James Brown's influence in Prog bands, like Crimson, GG and Yes may be a valid point. They have the same value of Bach and Beethoven's influence, Stockhausen and Cage's influence, Jerry Lee Lewis and Chuck Berry influences, Brubeck and Coltrane influences. They are all influences, and other bands that share some of these influences are not necessarily prog.


Posted By: tokenrove
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 17:44
Funkadelic had some pretty progressive tendencies. I feel there are some similarities to Magma there, from shared roots rather than interaction between the bands. Also, they definitely weren't 100% funk; songs like March to the Witch's Castle aren't very funky, but dark and heavy, if I recall correctly. (Don't have my Funkadelic albums here.) I'd be quite grateful to hear any recommendations for other bands based in funk with as much eclecticism as Funkadelic had.

On a side note, someone was mentioning progressive country. Not to suggest the artist for this site, clearly, but "Phases & Stages" by Willie Nelson is a great concept album with recurring musical themes and so on, maybe the closest I've heard to progressive country.

In terms of what gets added to the site, it seems to me like there are a lot of bands, like Funkadelic, or Metallica, or Willie Nelson, that could be recommended to prog listeners as something they might like, that have many elements of prog, without being "prog enough" for consensus. Why not allow the forum to continue to serve this purpose, and keep controversial bands out of the archives? I don't contribute enough to the community here for me to say anymore, but that's just my thoughts on it based on being a lurker for a long time.

I'm eternally searching for progressive music based in any genre, not just rock. I'd love to hear, for example, progressive rap developed with the influence of operatic recitative, baroque counterpoint, and minimalist polyrhythms. If someone created it, would it belong in these archives?


Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 18:39
Originally posted by akin akin wrote:


Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

The prog-rock part of Funkadelic and Parliament is multi-kybdst Bernie Worrell who remains active in prog related activities to this day. He's a fan of Keith Emerson and can match Emerson and any other prog kybdst for classical, jazz and rock technique.

Funny how EW&F is being held up as the bad end of this addition tendency, early EW&F is probably more progressive than P-funk, as well as lot's of bands already on this site. My three favorite all-time prog rock concerts are Crimson, Genesis and EW&F. I consider RnB to be part of rock, just my personal tastes.

You'll add or don't add whoever you like, I don't care, it's a fun site.

P.S. James Brown's introduction of music composed of interlocking melodic parts (a concept he 'borrowed' from Cuban jazz) as opposed to chords and melodies was very progressive and after passing through some other artists eventually became a big influence (possibly unconsciously) on King Crimson, Gentle Giant, Yes (especially Squire) and others.

P.S. P.S. In retrospect, I think the three previously mentioned classic prog bands borrowed directly from James, just listen to Fripp and Howe's comping technique.
The James Brown's influence in Prog bands, like Crimson, GG and Yes may be a valid point. They have the same value of Bach and Beethoven's influence, Stockhausen and Cage's influence, Jerry Lee Lewis and Chuck Berry influences, Brubeck and Coltrane influences. They are all influences, and other bands that share some of these influences are not necessarily prog.




Hi Akin, let me make this very clear once more: I WAS TALKING ABOUT MUSIC, NOT SUGGESTING BANDS FOR PA INCLUSION. I would imagine the title of the thread makes it seem like every post is about PA inclusion, but mine was not.

Just because I might say some band has progressive tendecies, or they were an influence on prog-rock doesn't mean I think they belong in PA. I enjoy talking about music, but I find conversations about who belongs on PA to be utterly boring, and besides, those conversations tend to bring out the worst in people.


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 18:55
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:





Hi Akin, let me make this very clear once more: I WAS TALKING ABOUT MUSIC, NOT SUGGESTING BANDS FOR PA INCLUSION. I would imagine the title of the thread makes it seem like every post is about PA inclusion, but mine was not.
 
We know you're not suggesting them, but the point is that the thread is about addition, so people will assume (despite you made it clear enough, this is not your case) that any positive opinion about Funkadelic is a vote for them to be added.
 

Just because I might say some band has progressive tendecies, or they were an influence on prog-rock doesn't mean I think they belong in PA. I enjoy talking about music, but I find conversations about who belongs on PA to be utterly boring, and besides, those conversations tend to bring out the worst in people.
 
Then blame people who started it.....For God's sake, somebody is suggesting Willie Nelson is Prog in this thread!!!!!! That's the first step for addition (BTW: Also suggesting Prog Rap).
 
That would make Julio Iglesias Related because they sung "For all the girls I Loved" together. Dead
 
And it's not the worst of the people, I believe it's the best, because we prove that we care about the genre, despite we win nothing fighting against their inclusion,
 
Iván
 


-------------
            


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 19:14
I would rather we not put the blame on anyone for making suggestions (that way lies one-upmanship, self-righteousness, and bigotry.  I think we should strive to be more tolerant and open to other notions, while at the same time free to express our own ideas/ opinions).

I posted this earlier in another thread in relation to a  post by Easy Money:

The way I look at it is that something can be prog-related without it necessarily being right for the site (at least at this time).  I wouldn't push for Funkadelic, but find sometimes people are too closed minded too even consider the possibility/ merits of a band/ proposal, or to really explore the issue from various angles (often a gut/ emotional reaction) -- too often it becomes black and white (I'm not so much one to think it's either progressive rock or not or right or wrong (so much music covered here); there's a grey area, and that makes such "out-of-the-box discussions interesting, especially as such additions affect the direction of the site).  At least the notion of P-Funk and EW&F's inclusion is interesting, and not something to be dismissed out-of-hand.  People often are looking for the parameters of additions, and the boundaries are very fuzzy (to almost non-existent) since so many different syles of music are represented by bands at this site, and we have our own ideas of what is worthy, and which direction the site should take, and not take.

Fewer people should dismiss, and more people should explore notions and be open to other ideas/ perspectives (that another point of view can be valid).


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 19:34
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

I would rather we not put the blame on anyone for making suggestions (that way lies one-upmanship, self-righteousness, and bigotry.  I think we should strive to be more tolerant and open to other notions, while at the same time free to express our own ideas/ opinions).
 
The word blame is only a reply to Easy Money's post that said he hates addition thread, probably it was a wrong shoice of word, but you can't post repeatedly on an addition thread and then claim ou hate addition threads.

I posted this earlier in another thread in relation to a  post by Easy Money:

The way I look at it is that something can be prog-related without it necessarily being right for the site (at least at this time). 
 
If it's Prog Related, it's for the site, if it's not Prog Related, it's not for the site, my honest opinion is that Funkadelic has absolutely no relation with Progresssive Rock.
 
I wouldn't push for Funkadelic, but find sometimes people are too closed minded too even consider the possibility/ merits of a band/ proposal,
 
Why close minded? Because we have solid and fundamented opinions?
 
I have my perspective of Prog based in three decades of listening Prog and reading whatever I can related with the issue, and I believe my opinion is as valid as any other one.
 
Am I close ,minded because I believe calling Willlie Nelson Prog is absurd?
 
Please!!!!!!!! 
 
or to really explore the issue from various angles (often a gut/ emotional reaction) -- too often it becomes black and white (I'm not so much one to think it's either progressive rock or not or right or wrong (so much music covered here);
 
That's the problem, people pushing addition of non Prog bands think that Prog = Good and Non Prog = Band
 
 
 there's a grey area, and that makes such "out-of-the-box discussions interesting, especially as such additions affect the direction of the site).  At least the notion of P-Funk and EW&F's inclusion is interesting, and not something to be dismissed out-of-hand. 
 
Not dismissed out of hand, some of us have a conception of what is Prog and what is not, I believe Funkadelic is a non Prog band, a good Funk ban, but nothing more and EW&F even worst, a Pop, Disco, Funk band.
 
People often are looking for the parameters of additions, and the boundaries are very fuzzy (to almost non-existent) since so many different syles of music are represented by bands at this site, and we have our own ideas of what is worthy, and which direction the site should take, and not take.
 
The parameters used to be clear, but lately things have changed.

Fewer people should dismiss, and more people should explore notions and be open to other ideas/ perspectives (that another point of view can be valid).
 
Why shouldn't we reject an addition we honestly believe is wrong?
 
Why should we explore what we know  is wrong for us?
 
Iván

 
 


-------------
            


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 20:16
Ivan, please don't take it personally.  I mentioned that my 3rd and 4th paragraphs were in relation to something that Easy Money said (from another thread in fact) and I was thinking more generally (hardly in all cases and hardly just with this proposal).  You're free to think that Funkadelic has no relation to Prog, just as others, such as myself are free to think otherwise.  It would be intolerant of me to say that you shouldn't express that.  I'm not invalidating your opinion ,my point was meant to be that more than one opinion can be valid.  And I said prog-related (not capitalised).  My point is that I think that something can have a relation to prog without it being acceptable for the Prog Related category.  I thought you agreed with that, as you've pointed out the definition before to say that "the inclusion of a band is exceptional"  and had thought you thought that not all bands that have some relation to progressive rock should be accepted.

Some probably do think that Prog=good, non-Prog=bad (I don't recall anyone saying that, but some might think it), but many don't when showing some support for the more controversial additions (or at least saying that the idea is not as far-fetched as some make it out to be),  I know that Prog can be very bad (at least according to my tastes, and I put other music ahead of it artistically and creatively even though I enjoy Prog).  I love Tallis, and am not ashamed to say it, but you don't see me claiming he is Prog (though progressive, but hardly Prog).  For a much more modern artist, I like Gary Numan, but have not suggested him.  I know that some dismiss out of hand sometimes without trying to understand, or explore other points of view (sometimes without even really knowing the music)  People can be like that.  Sometimes people even ridicule others who have differences of opinion/ offer a different perspective.

I'm not saying that we would should not reject a band for addition, team members, including myself, do it all the time.  What I mean is that we explore what other people are trying to say and feel.  It's part of trying to understand where other people are coming from.  I'm a great believer in exploring notions, even if we don't agree with them -- really pondering it.  Of course we can disagree. 

One of the problems, sometimes, I think is that too many people argue (take on an adversarial approach), and are not give-and-take, and not enough people really discuss in a friendly, exploratory manner (the exploration of ideas).  Too often it's wrong or right, whereas I'd rather there be more synthesis of ideas (not to mention respect for other opinions).

Incidentally, I could see a case for Willie Nelson as a progressive artist, but not Prog, but I must have missed the post where someone claimed he was Prog (not that it matters).


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 20:26
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

I would rather we not put the blame on anyone for making suggestions (that way lies one-upmanship, self-righteousness, and bigotry.  I think we should strive to be more tolerant and open to other notions, while at the same time free to express our own ideas/ opinions).

I posted this earlier in another thread in relation to a  post by Easy Money:

The way I look at it is that something can be prog-related without it necessarily being right for the site (at least at this time).  I wouldn't push for Funkadelic, but find sometimes people are too closed minded too even consider the possibility/ merits of a band/ proposal, or to really explore the issue from various angles (often a gut/ emotional reaction) -- too often it becomes black and white (I'm not so much one to think it's either progressive rock or not or right or wrong (so much music covered here); there's a grey area, and that makes such "out-of-the-box discussions interesting, especially as such additions affect the direction of the site).  At least the notion of P-Funk and EW&F's inclusion is interesting, and not something to be dismissed out-of-hand.  People often are looking for the parameters of additions, and the boundaries are very fuzzy (to almost non-existent) since so many different syles of music are represented by bands at this site, and we have our own ideas of what is worthy, and which direction the site should take, and not take.

Fewer people should dismiss, and more people should explore notions and be open to other ideas/ perspectives (that another point of view can be valid).


oh this thread is entertaining... LOL

Greg.. great post... and a voice of reason here.  Could say a lot more... but....I don't have to. LOL I think my point is best left unspoken... but is very clear. This dismissal of others ideas...and antagonism ... the bloodsport that passes for having an opinion...  of other's ideas is ruining this site.. far more than addtions they claim that do hahahha.  That is something that should be cracked down on here... for the good of the site.. it is fine to have an opinion... it is something else to make it on the back of others... that is not a way a site should run.  Groups and ideas are proposed...  the appropriate people judge it... all without making people feel stupid or not having a say here. 

again though .. talking to the wind... again.. .for reason best left unspoken hahhaa

great post Greg.. that gets some clappies. ClapClap


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: jammun
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 20:43
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:



For God's sake, somebody is suggesting Willie Nelson is Prog in this thread!!!!!! 
 
 
Whew, had to go back and make sure that wasn't one of my comments since it sounds like something I'd say after a few too many long-neck Lone Stars.


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 20:49
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:



For God's sake, somebody is suggesting Willie Nelson is Prog in this thread!!!!!! 
 
 
Whew, had to go back and make sure that wasn't one of my comments since it sounds like something I'd say after a few too many long-neck Lone Stars.


oh god... Lone Stars!!!!!!.... haven't had one of those in YEARS hahhah.  A couple of those to these parched lips .and Willie would be up before the Prog Folk team for evaluation LOL

being a light-weight these days has it's advantages LOL


One of my treasured mementos of college was a Lone Star bottle David Allen Coe signed for me ...  and was one of the first things my wife tossed in the trash after I got married LOLLOL


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 20:53
[QUOTE=Logan] Ivan, please don't take it personally.  I mentioned that my 3rd and 4th paragraphs were in relation to something that Easy Money said (from another thread in fact) and I was thinking more generally (hardly in all cases and hardly just with this proposal).  You're free to think that Funkadelic has no relation to Prog, just as others, such as myself are free to think otherwise.  It would be intolerant of me to say that you shouldn't express that.  I'm not invalidating your opinion ,my point was meant to be that more than one opinion can be valid.  And I said prog-related (not capitalised).  My point is that I think that something can have a relation to prog without it being acceptable for the Prog Related category.  I thought you agreed with that, as you've pointed out the definition before to say that "the inclusion of a band is exceptional"  and had thought you thought that not all bands that have some relation to progressive rock should be accepted.
 
Logan, your post was clearly refered toi mine, you and I know it, you even referred to one word I said and that is blame, but I don't take it personally, just that I'm tired being the only one who expresses a strong opinion and have to take the bad guy position, but when a poll is started, more than usually people vote massively against this barely (if at all) related with Prog bands, this silent majority is the one that pisses me.
 
And no, I talk about exceptional was referred to the fact that the addition of a band to Prog related must not be the main prioty of the site, but an exception.

Some probably do think that Prog=good, non-Prog=bad (I don't recall anyone saying that, but some might think it), but many don't when showing some support for the more controversial additions (or at least saying that the idea is not as far-fetched as some make it out to be), 
 
Now you're the one taking it personally, never said you mentioned that, I clearly stated that some peope who propose non Prog bands believe that Prog is Good and non Prog is bad. Just read some arguments for some bands  "It's a great band, deserves to be here"
 
I know that Prog can be very bad (at least according to my tastes, and I put other music ahead of it artistically and creatively even though I enjoy Prog).  I love Tallis, and am not ashamed to say it, but you don't see me claiming he is Prog (though progressive, but hardly Prog).  For a much more modern artist, I like Gary Numan, but have not suggested him.  I know that some dismiss out of hand sometimes without trying to understand, or explore other points of view (sometimes without even really knowing the music)  People can be like that.  Sometimes people even ridicule others who have differences of opinion/ offer a different perspective.
 
I didn't ridicule, only kept my strong position.

I'm not saying that we would should not reject a band for addition, team members, including myself, do it all the time.  What I mean is that we explore what other people are trying to say and feel.  It's part of trying to understand where other people are coming from.  I'm a great believer in exploring notions, even if we don't agree with them -- really pondering it.  Of course we can disagree. 
 
I'm not saying we shouldn't discuss bands, I'm against the addition of barely Prog bands as a priority of the site.

One of the problems, sometimes, I think is that too many people argue (take on an adversarial approach), and are not give-and-take, and not enough people really discuss in a friendly, exploratory manner (the exploration of ideas).  Too often it's wrong or right, whereas I'd rather there be more synthesis of ideas (not to mention respect for other opinions).
 
Logan, as soon as somebody takes a contrary position towards an addition, that person is called close minded, others say that we harm the site, so yes the discussion is hard and strong, but at least from my part, I never offended a person (neither you).

Incidentally, I could see a case for Willie Nelson as a progressive artist, but not Prog, but I must have missed the post where someone claimed he was Prog (not that it matters).
 
The point is that claiming an artist is Progressive, is the first step for proposing an addition, and in this case, I do believe it's absurd to even suggest Willie Nelson has the slightest relation with Progressive Rock.

Iván

EDIT: I believe it's healthier to speak loud before a band is added than making a scandal after it's in Prog Archives as many do. When a band is added I shut my mouth, because nothing can be done.


-------------
            


Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 20:56
You'll have worn me out, all I can figure from this thread anymore is that Greg Lake should record a version of 'For All the Girls I Ever Loved' with a 'progressive rap' that includes some Baroque counterpoint.

I feel sorry for the guy who made the initial post, I bet he is a million miles from here by now. Hey Dude! Come back, we may be nuts, but we're harmless.


Posted By: jammun
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 20:56
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:



For God's sake, somebody is suggesting Willie Nelson is Prog in this thread!!!!!! 
 
 
Whew, had to go back and make sure that wasn't one of my comments since it sounds like something I'd say after a few too many long-neck Lone Stars.


oh god... Lone Stars!!!!!!.... haven't had one of those in YEARS hahhah.  A couple of those to these parched lips .and Willie would be up before the Prog Folk team for evaluation LOL

being a light-weight these days has it's advantages LOL


One of my treasured mementos of college was a Lone Star bottle David Allen Coe signed for me ...  and was one of the first things my wife tossed in the trash after I got married LOLLOL
 
Not to hijack the thread -- I think the discussion had something to do with Funkadelic Big%20smile -- but I haven't had a Lone Star for probably 20 years either.  But of course the urge to use "Willie" and "Lone Star" in a single sentence was overwhelming.  
 
One more thing for consideration, however...now why would Miles Davis have written a song called "Willie Nelson"?   


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 21:00
One question...What the hell is a lone star?
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 21:03
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

One question...What the hell is a lone star?
 
Iván


LOL nectar of the gods Ivan...




-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 21:04
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:


Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:


For God's sake, somebody is suggesting Willie Nelson is Prog in this thread!!!!!! 

<font size="3" color="#0000ff"> 

 

Whew, had to go back and make sure that wasn't one of my comments since it sounds like something I'd say after a few too many long-neck Lone Stars.
oh god... Lone Stars!!!!!!.... haven't had one of those in YEARS hahhah.  A couple of those to these parched lips .and Willie would be up before the Prog Folk team for evaluation LOL being a light-weight these days has it's advantages LOLOne of my treasured mementos of college was a Lone Star bottle David Allen Coe signed for me ...  and was one of the first things my wife tossed in the trash after I got married LOLLOL




That is one of the funniest (Homer Simpson voice "It's funny cos it's true") things I have ever read on here. Obviously I know the type well. I won't even bother to type any ha ha ... s


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 21:08
Ahh, we had one like that in Perú, it had 13.5% of alcohol
 
After several car accidents, the brand vanished it.
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 21:11
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Ahh, we had one like that in Perú, it had 13.5% of alcohol
 
After several car accidents, the brand vanished it.
 
Iván


hahahha.. that is not the same as that 'tea' (was that it.. that truckers get at rest stops?.. )  you told me about one time was it LOLLOLLOL Now THAT was .. next to our friend 'freaking monkey' was the FUNNIEST thing I have ever read here on this site,  when you told us about that. 


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 21:14
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:


Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:


For God's sake, somebody is suggesting Willie Nelson is Prog in this thread!!!!!! 

<font size="3" color="#0000ff"> 

 

Whew, had to go back and make sure that wasn't one of my comments since it sounds like something I'd say after a few too many long-neck Lone Stars.
oh god... Lone Stars!!!!!!.... haven't had one of those in YEARS hahhah.  A couple of those to these parched lips .and Willie would be up before the Prog Folk team for evaluation LOL being a light-weight these days has it's advantages LOLOne of my treasured mementos of college was a Lone Star bottle David Allen Coe signed for me ...  and was one of the first things my wife tossed in the trash after I got married LOLLOL




That is one of the funniest (Homer Simpson voice "It's funny cos it's true") things I have ever read on here. Obviously I know the type well. I won't even bother to type any ha ha ... s


yeah.. she was a real pistol LOLOuch


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 21:20
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:



hahahha.. that is not the same as that 'tea' (was that it.. that truckers get at rest stops?.. )  you told me about one time was it LOLLOLLOL Now THAT was .. next to our friend 'freaking monkey' was the FUNNIEST thing I have ever read here on this site,  when you told us about that. 
 
LOLLOLLOL
 
That was the magic coffee LOL
 
A small restaurant in the highway sold a magic coffee that didn't let you sleep and ciured the altitude sicklness
 
I took one once I felt terribly sick (It was at almost 5,000 Mts over the sea level (Like 15,000 feet), it stopped the altitude sicknes and kept me awake, but the lights and the cars passed dancing in front of me and when reached he hotel at 2 am, I was walking in the ceiling Wink
 
Later the health department made a check up and closed  the place, it was found that it had not only amphetamines but also Ayahuasca if I'm not wrong. It was fun to see the cars dancing in the highway though.
 
Iván
 
 


-------------
            


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 21:38
oh good times indeed... I remember dying with laughter when you told us of that...

and on that note.... my two cents as usual..

remember brothers.... the site is supposed to be fun.... people make suggestions....  we all know those that have no chance in hell.. and those have a legitimate basis for being here without sh*tting on the people who we actually in effect are working for.   To the non-collabs...  dropping a reign of sh*t upon people's ideas or suggestons  is never a good idea... for it only fosters the the type of enviroment that might  bring down a river of sh*t maybe on YOUR suggestion. Trust me.. people here have LONG memories.


and for the collabs... how many times do you have to see collabs going at each others throats to see that a live and let live mind set is the best course here ...the absense of which.. has turned FAR more people off this site than any addition ever has.. or ever will. Not to mention.... we are here to work for the site.. and the people here... not to mock... for when you cut to the bone...  that is exactly what happens when it goes beyond merely expressing an opinion... and having what we had here.. and have had time and time again.  The experts here will deal with the suggestions.. the bogus ones get rejected...  the ones that aren't..  are at the discretion of those who work and love this site just as much as one here.

my two cents on Funkadelic... and everything else dicussed here.  Remember...  we all love the music .. there is no right ... and no wrong way to look at it.  Thankfully we have a site that is not black and white.. but grey... just like the music we are here for... if you want black and white..  there is pop music.. metal... this music has far too many colours.. and nuances for anyone to ever definitatively say what is prog or not... this site is about the music.  As such.. it get judged strictly upon it.. Otherwise.. the site would have locked the doors to any groups post 70's and non-Eurpopean .. who are not generally known as PROG.

my speech for the day.. Greg  was dead on... and his earlier post should be required reading hahha.


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 22:15
I don't care for doing these point by point posts, as I find one often loses the main points of a post

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Ivan, please don't take it personally.  I mentioned that my 3rd and 4th paragraphs were in relation to something that Easy Money said (from another thread in fact) and I was thinking more generally (hardly in all cases and hardly just with this proposal).  You're free to think that Funkadelic has no relation to Prog, just as others, such as myself are free to think otherwise.  It would be intolerant of me to say that you shouldn't express that.  I'm not invalidating your opinion ,my point was meant to be that more than one opinion can be valid.  And I said prog-related (not capitalised).  My point is that I think that something can have a relation to prog without it being acceptable for the Prog Related category.  I thought you agreed with that, as you've pointed out the definition before to say that "the inclusion of a band is exceptional"  and had thought you thought that not all bands that have some relation to progressive rock should be accepted.
 
Logan, your post was clearly refered toi mine, you and I know it, you even referred to one word I said and that is blame, but I don't take it personally, just that I'm tired being the only one who expresses a strong opinion and have to take the bad guy position, but when a poll is started, more than usually people vote massively against this barely (if at all) related with Prog bands, this silent majority is the one that pisses me.

The first paragraph specifically referred to yours and I used that as  a springboard for pasting in a related post that I had written in another thread earlier in the day in response to Easy Money.  See this: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=37670&PID=2962563#2962563 - http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=37670&PID=2962563#2962563
 
And no, I talk about exceptional was referred to the fact that the addition of a band to Prog related must not be the main prioty of the site, but an exception.

Yes? Sorry, I'm not following, how that is different from what I was saying?

Some probably do think that Prog=good, non-Prog=bad (I don't recall anyone saying that, but some might think it), but many don't when showing some support for the more controversial additions (or at least saying that the idea is not as far-fetched as some make it out to be), 
 
Now you're the one taking it personally, never said you mentioned that, I clearly stated that some peope who propose non Prog bands believe that Prog is Good and non Prog is bad. Just read some arguments for some bands  "It's a great band, deserves to be here"

Why do you assume I'm taking it personally?  I don't recall claiming that you ever said I mentioned that.  You specifically said,

[QUOTE]
That's the problem, people pushing addition of non Prog bands think that Prog = Good and Non Prog = Band


Band being a typo, of course.  I'm not claiming that none do it, I just wanted to point out that I don't believe that most do it (I'm not sure how exceptional such behavior is -- I don't think it's the norm from most who want to see bands in -- of course I've seen it). 
 
I know that Prog can be very bad (at least according to my tastes, and I put other music ahead of it artistically and creatively even though I enjoy Prog).  I love Tallis, and am not ashamed to say it, but you don't see me claiming he is Prog (though progressive, but hardly Prog).  For a much more modern artist, I like Gary Numan, but have not suggested him.  I know that some dismiss out of hand sometimes without trying to understand, or explore other points of view (sometimes without even really knowing the music)  People can be like that.  Sometimes people even ridicule others who have differences of opinion/ offer a different perspective.
 
I didn't ridicule, only kept my strong position.

Again, I'm speaking more generally, though some of your comments may come across that way.  The "Please!" and for god's sakes, for instance. 

I'm not saying that we would should not reject a band for addition, team members, including myself, do it all the time.  What I mean is that we explore what other people are trying to say and feel.  It's part of trying to understand where other people are coming from.  I'm a great believer in exploring notions, even if we don't agree with them -- really pondering it.  Of course we can disagree. 
 
I'm not saying we shouldn't discuss bands, I'm against the addition of barely Prog bands as a priority of the site.

So am I, but in the case of Funkadelic, we're discussing a band that you have said you thought has no relation to progressive rockI don't think it's that cut-and-dried.

One of the problems, sometimes, I think is that too many people argue (take on an adversarial approach), and are not give-and-take, and not enough people really discuss in a friendly, exploratory manner (the exploration of ideas).  Too often it's wrong or right, whereas I'd rather there be more synthesis of ideas (not to mention respect for other opinions).
 
Logan, as soon as somebody takes a contrary position towards an addition, that person is called close minded, others say that we harm the site, so yes the discussion is hard and strong, but at least from my part, I never offended a person (neither you).

Of course, I've seen people calling people close-minded for taking a contrary position.  That's why I think we should be more open to other perspectives (for and against, of course).



Incidentally, I could see a case for Willie Nelson as a progressive artist, but not Prog, but I must have missed the post where someone claimed he was Prog (not that it matters).
 
The point is that claiming an artist is Progressive, is the first step for proposing an addition, and in this case, I do believe it's absurd to even suggest Willie Nelson has the slightest relation with Progressive Rock.

You wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan Ivan wrote:

Then blame people who started it.....For God's sake, somebody is suggesting Willie Nelson is Prog in this thread!!!!!! That's the first step for addition (BTW: Also suggesting Prog Rap).


Now here is TokenRove's post (I do prefer to quote in full):

Originally posted by tokenrove tokenrove wrote:

Funkadelic had some pretty progressive tendencies. I feel there are some similarities to Magma there, from shared roots rather than interaction between the bands. Also, they definitely weren't 100% funk; songs like March to the Witch's Castle aren't very funky, but dark and heavy, if I recall correctly. (Don't have my Funkadelic albums here.) I'd be quite grateful to hear any recommendations for other bands based in funk with as much eclecticism as Funkadelic had.

On a side note, someone was mentioning progressive country. Not to suggest the artist for this site, clearly, but "Phases & Stages" by Willie Nelson is a great concept album with recurring musical themes and so on, maybe the closest I've heard to progressive country
.

In terms of what gets added to the site, it seems to me like there are a lot of bands, like Funkadelic, or Metallica, or Willie Nelson, that could be recommended to prog listeners as something they might like, that have many elements of prog, without being "prog enough" for consensus. Why not allow the forum to continue to serve this purpose, and keep controversial bands out of the archives? I don't contribute enough to the community here for me to say anymore, but that's just my thoughts on it based on being a lurker for a long time.

I'm eternally searching for progressive music based in any genre, not just rock. I'd love to hear, for example, progressive rap developed with the influence of operatic recitative, baroque counterpoint, and minimalist polyrhythms. If someone created it, would it belong in these archives?


What is wrong for with the post?  Is he saying that Willie Nelson is Prog (i.e. progressive rock), or claiming it should be included?  He mentioned progressive country (which relates to an earlier post)  Your respresentation of what he was saying is unfair, and ridiculing i would say.  And he's right that it might appeal to proggers.  I like Willie Nelson too.  Progressive rock isn't the only kind of progressive music.  And in fact, before the Progressive Rock term, we had progressive jazz.

Iván

EDIT: I believe it's healthier to speak loud before a band is added than making a scandal after it's in Prog Archives as many do. When a band is added I shut my mouth, because nothing can be done.

I agree,  I'll copy and paste a post I wrte in the Metallica thread earlier today....



Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Chris Stacey Chris Stacey wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

People often prefer to moan about additions once in than offer arguments against the addition when it's being proposed.  The best posts commonly provide both pros and cons, and are more exploratory in nature, when it comes to less straight-forward additions.
 
Good point but don't you think it is like flogging a dead horse now? Surely the PMT need to  make the call where Metallica go and then as a previous post mentions the "shocked" outcry will happen after the addition. There are many credible collaborators and reviewers/posters who have made the right justification for inclusions......so talks about talks....or......addition?


PMT did make the call before by rejecting Metallica for Prog Metal (though not unanimous and some don't work with the team anymore (I believe), and one new member didn't vote on an already rejected horse):  http://progfreak.com/home/progarchives.xhtml?path=pm%2Fall&block=17 - http://progfreak.com http://progfreak.com/home/progarchives.xhtml?path=pm%2Fall&block=17 - /home/progarchives.xhtml?path=pm%2Fall&block=17

HP MS C Artist TP T bu AV UI At Tr iv ho Ra MR Section
http://www.metallica.com/">Homepage http://www.myspace.com/metallica">Myspace us http://progfreak.com/Metallica,_dbe,artists,_auto_8057510.xhtml - Metallica       Prog%20Metal%20Chart:%20Rejected

But decisions are reversible -- sometimes reconsidered.  Need not be immutable decisions cast in stone  The proposed new prog metal definition that is still being worked on I believe may open the parameters of PM to more easily allow Metallica in (to put it glibly, it could help define Metallica as a Prog Metal band into existence).

That said, it has been proposed to Prog Related (and even Proto Prog though it does not fit current parameters), and I haven't heard that the PR team has come to a decision based on weighing up the for and against arguments.  Until they reject it as well (or ask to put it on hold), it's not a dead horse for PA inclusion (and even rejected bands sometimes are reevaluated and included in categories -- often because of new proggy material, but sometimes not -- sometimes it's just new thinking based on new material or even old checked material that is reconsidered).

Irregardless of whether or not it is ever included in whatever category, it's a lively discussion, and interesting to think what effect such an addition would have on future additions and the direction of the site (some people are for a more inclusive and broader site, others are fine with the status quo, and many would rather see a narrower Prog focus, and quite a few are only inclusive when it comes to music they like).  So this discussion has a broader scope than just Metallica, and that's a reason why some fear it.  They fear it would lead to more additions which will further dilute this Prog site.

I don't think the shocked outcry should come after the addition (certainly not for those who have followed it)... People should know what to expect, but shocked outrage often does follow (and not just with new members... As if ya didn't know, already... Well, some don't).  Speak your mind now, or forever hold your peace. Wink  As if people would.... Now is the better time to speak than after the fact (though one can speak at both times), and with an addition like this, well-expressed opinions by anyone are much more likely to be taken into account than with other additions.

Speak out only after the fact and one may get a response like, "Metallica is in the archives, and will not be removed, deal with it!" Or "You should have said something at the time, presented your case, when we were discussing it for potential inclusion."

Anyway, I'm all for free discussion, so if people want to discuss it, then let 'em have their fun.




-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 08 2008 at 23:12
Iván in the usual blue
 
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

I don't care for doing these point by point posts, as I find one often loses the main points of a post

I discovered it's better because if not, some people accuse of editing their posts (Not accusing you).

The first paragraph specifically referred to yours and I used that as  a springboard for pasting in a related post that I had written in another thread earlier in the day in response to Easy Money.  See this: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=37670&PID=2962563#2962563 - http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=37670&PID=2962563#2962563
 
Well. then I was not wrong taking it personally, it's was directed towards me.

Yes? Sorry, I'm not following, how that is different from what I was saying?

Absolutely different, saying an addition is exceptional, by no mean implies that some Prog bands will stay out, mainly because by definition no Prog Related band is Prog

Why do you assume I'm taking it personally?  I don't recall claiming that you ever said I mentioned that.  You specifically said,

Because you said "I don't recall anyone saying that, but some might think it"  and it sounded to me as if you were taking it personally, but if I'm wrong, this not too important.

Band being a typo, of course.  I'm not claiming that none do it, I just wanted to point out that I don't believe that most do it (I'm not sure how exceptional such behavior is -- I don't think it's the norm from most who want to see bands in -- of course I've seen it). 

I'm not the only one who thinks some people here see Prog as an award or a certificate of quality. it's obvious even when you read people's arguments "The band is great" as a justification for an addition, and hoonestly this behaviout is not rare.

Again, I'm speaking more generally, though some of your comments may come across that way.  The "Please!" and for god's sakes, for instance. 
 
That's not offending anybody, is my honest reaction when I see some so obviously non Propg suggestions

So am I, but in the case of Funkadelic, we're discussing a band that you have said you thought has no relation to progressive rockI don't think it's that cut-and-dried.

That's the difference, I believe it has absolutely no relation and I stand in my point.

Of course, I've seen people calling people close-minded for taking a contrary position.  That's why I think we should be more open to other perspectives (for and against, of course).

You've seen Logan? Lets be fair, in every thread somebody oposes to a Rap, Hip Hop, Pop or Funk addition, the "Close Minded" argument appears at least once.

Now here is TokenRove's post (I do prefer to quote in full):


On a side note, someone was mentioning progressive country. Not to suggest the artist for this site, clearly, but "Phases & Stages" by Willie Nelson is a great concept album with recurring musical themes and so on, maybe the closest I've heard to progressive country
.

That's why I wrote:

Quote The point is that claiming an artist is Progressive, is the first step for proposing an addition, and in this case, I do believe it's absurd to even suggest Willie Nelson has the slightest relation with Progressive Rock.

I've seen it happen hundreds of times, first people say "It's Progressive but I fdon't suggest them", and after a couple of days they are suggesting the inclusion.
 
I agree, 
 
That's why I take a strong position before the band is added, but if added I shut my mouth, unlikle many people who keep silent during the debate and then they criticize additions like Blue Oyster Cult, Iron Maidemn, Led Zappelin, The Who, etc.
 
I hope you noticed I take a strong position only before a band is added.
 
I'll copy and paste a post I wrte in the Metallica thread earlier today....

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

People often prefer to moan about additions once in than offer arguments against the addition when it's being proposed.  The best posts commonly provide both pros and cons, and are more exploratory in nature, when it comes to less straight-forward additions.
 
Then we agree in something and I promisse you, I will fight will all I have against Funkadelic and E,W&F additions, but if added, i will shut up.
 
Iván
 



-------------
            


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 01:22
[
Originally posted by Ivan Ivan wrote:

That's why I wrote:
The point is that claiming an artist is Progressive, is the first step for proposing an addition, and in this case, I do believe it's absurd to even suggest Willie Nelson has the slightest relation with Progressive Rock.
I've seen it happen hundreds of times, first people say "It's Progressive but I fdon't suggest them", and after a couple of days they are suggesting the inclusion.


Maybe, but I don't see that following in this case...


Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

...
Then blame people who started it.....For God's sake, somebody is suggesting Willie Nelson is Prog in this thread!!!!!! That's the first step for addition (BTW: Also suggesting Prog Rap)...


Let's look at his post again in full.

Originally posted by tokenrove tokenrove wrote:

Funkadelic had some pretty progressive tendencies. I feel there are some similarities to Magma there, from shared roots rather than interaction between the bands. Also, they definitely weren't 100% funk; songs like March to the Witch's Castle aren't very funky, but dark and heavy, if I recall correctly. (Don't have my Funkadelic albums here.) I'd be quite grateful to hear any recommendations for other bands based in funk with as much eclecticism as Funkadelic had.

On a side note, someone was mentioning progressive country. Not to suggest the artist for this site, clearly, but "Phases & Stages" by Willie Nelson is a great concept album with recurring musical themes and so on, maybe the closest I've heard to progressive country.

In terms of what gets added to the site, it seems to me like there are a lot of bands, like Funkadelic, or Metallica, or Willie Nelson, that could be recommended to prog listeners as something they might like, that have many elements of prog, without being "prog enough" for consensus. Why not allow the forum to continue to serve this purpose, and keep controversial bands out of the archives? I don't contribute enough to the community here for me to say anymore, but that's just my thoughts on it based on being a lurker for a long time.

I'm eternally searching for progressive music based in any genre, not just rock. I'd love to hear, for example, progressive rap developed with the influence of operatic recitative, baroque counterpoint, and minimalist polyrhythms. If someone created it, would it belong in these archives?


But don't you see, Ivan, how using this (look at it in full) for your argument misrepresents, or gives the wrong impression about tokenrove's position?  Not only does he not say that Willie Nelson is Prog, he says it's maybe the closest he's heard to progressive country (I think most of us know the difference between Prog -- which is short for Progressive rock) and progressive music, which can be from various genres), but he makes an argument against such inclusion.  "In terms of what gets added to the site, it seems to me like there are a lot of bands, like Funkadelic, or Metallica, or Willie Nelson, that could be recommended to prog listeners as something they might like, that have many elements of prog, without being "prog enough" for consensus. Why not allow the forum to continue to serve this purpose, and keep controversial bands out of the archives?"

I read that to mean that we can always discuss these bands in the forums, but they should NOT be added to the archives in his opinion.  It's a good, thoughtful, and exploratory post, and I feel that your comments did not do it justice.

And is he suggesting prog rap by saying,

"I'm eternally searching for progressive music based in any genre, not just rock. I'd love to hear, for example, progressive rap developed with the influence of operatic recitative, baroque counterpoint, and minimalist polyrhythms. If someone created it, would it belong in these archives?"

It's a question.  Would it if it had those qualities?


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 01:54
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

oh good times indeed... I remember dying with laughter when you told us of that...

and on that note.... my two cents as usual..

remember brothers.... the site is supposed to be fun.... people make suggestions....  we all know those that have no chance in hell.. and those have a legitimate basis for being here without sh*tting on the people who we actually in effect are working for.   To the non-collabs...  dropping a reign of sh*t upon people's ideas or suggestons  is never a good idea... for it only fosters the the type of enviroment that might  bring down a river of sh*t maybe on YOUR suggestion. Trust me.. people here have LONG memories.


and for the collabs... how many times do you have to see collabs going at each others throats to see that a live and let live mind set is the best course here ...the absense of which.. has turned FAR more people off this site than any addition ever has.. or ever will. Not to mention.... we are here to work for the site.. and the people here... not to mock... for when you cut to the bone...  that is exactly what happens when it goes beyond merely expressing an opinion... and having what we had here.. and have had time and time again.  The experts here will deal with the suggestions.. the bogus ones get rejected...  the ones that aren't..  are at the discretion of those who work and love this site just as much as one here.

my two cents on Funkadelic... and everything else dicussed here.  Remember...  we all love the music .. there is no right ... and no wrong way to look at it.  Thankfully we have a site that is not black and white.. but grey... just like the music we are here for... if you want black and white..  there is pop music.. metal... this music has far too many colours.. and nuances for anyone to ever definitatively say what is prog or not... this site is about the music.  As such.. it get judged strictly upon it.. Otherwise.. the site would have locked the doors to any groups post 70's and non-Eurpopean .. who are not generally known as PROG.

my speech for the day.. Greg  was dead on... and his earlier post should be required reading hahha.


Interesting post!

Nothing to add to it, but this section "...we all know those that have no chance in hell.. and those have a legitimate basis for being here without sh*tting on the people who we actually in effect are working for.   To the non-collabs...  dropping a reign of sh*t upon people's ideas or suggestons  is never a good idea... for it only fosters the the type of enviroment that might  bring down a river of sh*t maybe on YOUR suggestion..." reminded me of Mr. Lahey of Trailer Park Boys.  Some of my favourite quotes...

"He's takin' the sh*t tornado right back to Oz. "

"Do you know what a sh*t barometer is Bubbles? It measures the sh*t pressure in the air. Eventually your head will implode from all the sh*t pressure. The winds of sh*t are coming."

"sh*t typhoon is a coming. We'd better haul in the jib before it gets covered in sh*t"

"Randy just doesn't understand. I mean I love him dearly, but I hate Ricky more. I just don't want to have to put up with that prick for the rest of my life. You know, he grew up as a little sh*t-spark from the old sh*t-flint. And then he turned into a sh*t-bonfire and then driven by the winds of his monumental ignorance, he turned into a raging sh*t-firestorm. If I get to be married to Barb i'll have total control of Sunnyvale, and then I can unleash a sh*tnami tidal wave that'll engulf Ricky and extinguish his sh*t-flames forever. And with any luck, he'll drown in the undersh*t of that wave. sh*t-waves. "


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 04:37
My $0.02;
 
Free Your Mind and Your Ass Will Follow;
 
Title track - loads of wooey noises and vocalisations - can't be bad! Widdly guitar - sounds more like psychedelia than Prog. OK, after about a minute of this, and it sounds like a cheap Zappa imitation - and I mean cheap. The purpose is just to freak out, not to progress. Check out the funky groove - you bet that puppy's going to kick in... eventually. About 8 minutes in - it grows, but again, this feels like a gimmick - a bit of fun rather than a genuine attempt to experiment. The mad panning is really irritating in headphones until around 9:00, where it seems to settle into something that feels quite proggy, until the psych guitar widdles all over the top of it. Hmm. Borderline.
Friday Night, August 14th - OK, this is the core of Funkadelic - funky choons, this one based on Foxy Lady and a wah-driven Strat sound clearly designed to sound like Hendrix, but just over-busy noodling. Nice backing vox, but check out the awful solo. The song runs out of steam at the standard 3:30 pop song length, and the band build up a jam, with loads of echo all over the shop - quite experimental sounding with a nod towards jazz - but a noodly jam around one chord, like psych.
Funky Dollar Bill - heh! Sounds like Jane's Addiction. Proto Rap in here - and that guitarist really wishes he was Hendrix. If I wasn't looking out for Prog elements, I'd be digging this track a whole lot more. The piano makes a very striking entrance, and plays around with the rhythm  - but the overall effect is like creating a loop in Fruity Loops and jamming over the top - and this is why the essence of this music is not Prog.
I Wanna Know if it's Good to You - We're in the same ballpark, as we are throughout the album - all the essential elements of all the other songs persist, but in more abundance; Hendrix-styled guitar over funky bass and drum lines, production effects a-plenty, especially insane panning, quasi-rapping... OK, it'd be hard to distinguish this track from much Krautrock - but most of the interest seems to come from production and effects rather than the music.
Some More - simple Booker T type thing with more effects than you can shake a stick at. Nice, but the simple, repetitive style belies bona fide Prog - and the sloppy Hammond playing is annoying.
Eulogy and Light - effects fest! Very interesting - and still completely within the Psych remit.
 
 
Maggott Brain:
 
Maggott Brain - 10 minutes of over indulgence with a Watkins copicat. Not Prog.
Can You Get to That - short Gospel-based ditty rooted in 2 chords. Not Prog.
Hit it and Quit it - Funktastic song, lyrics aren't exactly deep, driven by a single, groovy riff. Nice Hammond - but Not Prog.
You and Your Folks, Me and My Folks - Mmmmm, that's funky - drop the bass! Yeah Yeah Yeah (she loves you...) - straight down the line James Brown rooted funk, vocals approaching rap. Nice rockin' piano section, 4 to the floor rhythm driven by 8ths - shake that funky thang - Not Prog.
Super Stupid - it certainly would be to follow the Prog line here. Next stop the Red Hot Chili Peppers.
Back in Our Minds - heh! love the boingy sound, but Prog? er...
Wars of Armageddon - nearly 10 minutes, there's a Prog element. Hammond again - looking good. Beat mashup - very tasty. Here comes the funky bass, and manic vocalisations, wooey noises. pentatonic wailing guitar solo madly panned around the stereo picture - man, those drums are crazy! Breakdowns, reminding me of Can... there's 10 minutes of this? Hmm. It's a bit boring after 3 - you know exactly where it's going; more of the same. 6 minutes - amusing vocalisations - OK, since when was Prog about getting pussy? Meeoow indeed. More tea, vicar?
 
Sorry, but almost 10 minutes of near-prog isn't enough to make this a prog album, and it's not "proper" prog. It seems a step backwards from "Free Your Mind..."
 
 
"Standing on the Verge of Getting it On"
 
Again - more fun and games in the studio.
 
"It's not nice to fool with nature" we are told - but is exactly what this band does, with all the studio trickery, which is undeniably cool and fun, but this is exactly what Prog does not do - Prog is about the music, the compositions and what can be done with the music compositionally. The coolest, most fun part comes AFTER the composition, when it all takes shape. Before then, it's hard work.
 
As with the first two, this later Funkadelic album is more about being funky first, having a great time with the studio toys second, and the incidental creating of progressive compositions is an occasional result of fooling around rather than being one of the primary purposes.
 
Since someone else mentioned Metallica, it should be noted that to Metallica in the early days, the primary focus was on the progressive writing approach I just described - writing music of that complexity represents a lot of hard compositional work.
 
 
To me, Prog can't be jammed along to.
 
Try jamming along to Funkadelic. Mmmm - easy peasy, and lotsa fun!
 
Try jamming along to Metallica or Genesis, Dream Theater or King Crimson... or Magma... Very difficult!
 
Why?
 
Because of the composed essence of the music.
 


-------------
The important thing is not to stop questioning.


Posted By: Windhawk
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 04:50
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

My $0.02;
 
Prog is about the music, the compositions and what can be done with the music compositionally. The coolest, most fun part comes AFTER the composition, when it all takes shape. Before then, it's hard work.
 
 
 
If that is a truth cast in stone, we better say goodbye to Krautrock and psychedelic/space in here, and maybe jazzrock/fusion as well. All those genres would be pretty thined out following that line of reasoning.
 
I'm dead against Funkadelic's inclusion - but this argument isn't the best ;-)


-------------
Websites I work with:

http://www.progressor.net
http://www.houseofprog.com

My profile on Mixcloud:
https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 05:33
Those are Prog Related genres - none are Prog Rock per se - I thought that was common knowledge.
 
Indeed, the only Jazz Rock/Fusion I'd accept as Prog-related is the composed stuff, like Mahavishnu or Soft Machine.
 
Psychedelic Rock isn't Prog Rock, but there were some Progressive Psych bands - those who used composition as a basis, like Pink Floyd, for example.
 
Space Rock isn't Prog Rock - but contains anomalies like Hawkwind, whose musical goal was clearly to create a sonic universe of galactic proportions - and the lyrics emphasise this. In as much as the music is composed, the textures are all designed with this sonic journey in mind - composition is still a key goal.
 
Kraut/Kosmische kinda follows the same lines. It is music with intent - although at its worst, I agree, it's aimless jamming and little different to Psych. Maybe it should be thinned out a bit... At it's best, though - for example, Kraftwerk's first album, or Can, who are an interesting case, because they created compositions from improvisations - there are complex compositions to be found, and that's part of the fun of exploring the genre.
 
 
There are no truths cast in stone, only the ideas of truths: Please note that I underlined composed essence, not the earlier sentence - as improvisation is also an important element of Prog - and the underlining is merely emphasis to get the idea across. It's an important distinction to make. Wink
 
 


-------------
The important thing is not to stop questioning.


Posted By: Windhawk
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 06:22
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Those are Prog Related genres - none are Prog Rock per se - I thought that was common knowledge.
 
 
Well, these are listed as full progressive sub-genres on this site though - I guess that means you're opposed to the definitions of prog that this site use then?


-------------
Websites I work with:

http://www.progressor.net
http://www.houseofprog.com

My profile on Mixcloud:
https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 06:30


hahahha...   oh the joy of the archives...  for you both are right...

Structure IS one the predominant aspects that goes into making prog what it is.. in my opinion.. in a LOT of people's opinions if they actually sat down and tried to explain just what Prog IS.

however...  it is NOT the same as saying the lack of emphasis on structure makes something not prog.  Exceptions to the rule.. there always have been..  always will be.


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Windhawk
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 07:12
Hehe - structure, complexity and a certain skill on either technical or atmospheric aspect of the music. Which doesn't mean or indicate that it has to be planned though - Öresund Space Collective is a prime example of quite complex music that has been created without composing to give one example ;-)

-------------
Websites I work with:

http://www.progressor.net
http://www.houseofprog.com

My profile on Mixcloud:
https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/


Posted By: akin
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 07:13
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

if what your saying, akin, is that each artist should be judged and added on its own merits rather than if it does or does not 'fit' within a certain genre, I agree.  However, I don't think ProgMetal is any more separate from 'common prog' than JazzRock Fusion, Electronic, or Post/Math is






Neither do I, but there are lots of posts or threads in PA, made by the Prog Metal specialists and other Special Collaborators who are fans of Prog Metal stating that Prog Metal is a separate entity from "common prog" and bands that have nothing in common with "common prog" but share some elements with other debatable Prog Metal bands are Prog Metal.


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 08:02
Originally posted by Windhawk Windhawk wrote:

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Those are Prog Related genres - none are Prog Rock per se - I thought that was common knowledge.
 
 
Well, these are listed as full progressive sub-genres on this site though - I guess that means you're opposed to the definitions of prog that this site use then?
 
I think that most definitions of Prog are inaccurate - that doesn't mean I oppose them, quite the reverse - I am in the habit of proposing alternatives and working on something more accurate and meaningful.
 
I also think that most genre-isation of music is nonsensical, and the definitions almost always poorly thought through, especially in the last decade or so, where it's all gone genre-crazy in what seems to be a sad attempt at pigeon-holing so that fans of genre X can say "I really don't like genre Y" instead of appearing to be hypocritical in liking one band but disliking another similar band.
 
From what's what's available on their MySpace site, Öresund Space Collective are an interesting interpretation of what the Ozric Tentacles (and a large number of other jam bands in the 1980s) were doing - but they certainly don't remind me of early Hawkwind, as there doesn't appear to be the same focus - and I haven't heard anything particularly complex (compositionally) from them among the pieces posted there. Even the Ozrics (more specifically Ed Wynne) planned the compositions to some extent. I'd suspect that OSC only got into the archives because they sound a bit like the Ozrics - but would need to hear more of their stuff to verify this.
 
They certainly don't sound like Prog on a "touchy-feely" basis to me (ignoring any technical whys or wherefores). They sound like a large number of bands I used to jam with - they're not doing anything new.
 
Thanks for bringing them to my attention - their "Biography" is a copy and paste of the blurb on their MySpace site, so we need to edit it quickly, unless we've got permission to use it.


-------------
The important thing is not to stop questioning.


Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 08:33
Nice argument, as Micky said I love these threads but I'm just wondering why TaoJones proposed this band but hasn't made a single contribution to the argument over their inclusion.


Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 09:35
Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Nice argument, as Micky said I love these threads but I'm just wondering why TaoJones proposed this band but hasn't made a single contribution to the argument over their inclusion.



Just read all the crazy posts (mine included) over such a simple propisition, he probably thinks we're all nuts!


P.S. Maybe next time a simple 'no' will suffice, ha ha ha.


Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 13:14

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:



Maybe, but I don't see that following in this case...

As I told you Logan, I've seen this happen a lot of times, bands with no support and which most people don't believe should be here, being added after a short period of their intoduction as Progressive artists.


Let's look at his post again in full.

Again, I know what his post says but tell me something........Why mentioning some artist as Progressive if there isn't the secret desire for his addition?

We've seen this happen a lot of times.


But don't you see, Ivan, how using this (look at it in full) for your argument misrepresents, or gives the wrong impression about tokenrove's position?  Not only does he not say that Willie Nelson is Prog, he says it's maybe the closest he's heard to progressive country (I think most of us know the difference between Prog -- which is short for Progressive rock) and progressive music, which can be from various genres), but he makes an argument against such inclusion.  "In terms of what gets added to the site, it seems to me like there are a lot of bands, like Funkadelic, or Metallica, or Willie Nelson, that could be recommended to prog listeners as something they might like, that have many elements of prog, without being "prog enough" for consensus. Why not allow the forum to continue to serve this purpose, and keep controversial bands out of the archives?"
 
The problem wit this progressive vs Progressive Rock issue, is that there's already a good bunch of people announcing progressive artists should be added also, and that IMO is wrong, this is a Progressive Rock site.

I read that to mean that we can always discuss these bands in the forums, but they should NOT be added to the archives in his opinion.  It's a good, thoughtful, and exploratory post, and I feel that your comments did not do it justice.
 
If I'm wrong, I apologize, but honestly I believe the names have already been introduced, I'm 90% sure we'll se them suggested for addition very soon.

And is he suggesting prog rap by saying,

"I'm eternally searching for progressive music based in any genre, not just rock. I'd love to hear, for example, progressive rap developed with the influence of operatic recitative, baroque counterpoint, and minimalist polyrhythms. If someone created it, would it belong in these archives?"

It's a question.  Would it if it had those qualities?
 
Of course he's doing it

"If someone created it, would it belong in these archives?""

He's clearly opening the door, and if we remember, Prog Rap has been proposed more than once...I'm sure that you can notice this is a covered proposition, because allowing the posibility is opening the door.
 
Iván


-------------
            


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 20:19
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Nice argument, as Micky said I love these threads but I'm just wondering why TaoJones proposed this band but hasn't made a single contribution to the argument over their inclusion.



Just read all the crazy posts (mine included) over such a simple propisition, he probably thinks we're all nuts!


P.S. Maybe next time a simple 'no' will suffice, ha ha ha.


hahhaha...  yeah really...

Alan - no clue... but something to chew on....  did anyone in this thread think to welcome the guy, he was a new member... before tearing his suggestion apart LOL Nuts?.. perhaps... or maybe he thought we were all a lot of assholes for going apesh*t over a simple proposition LOL


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 20:38
this place is a jungle



Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 20:44
yep...

-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 21:25
I just sent Tao a PM, hopefully he'll come back and chat with us some day.

Now on the subject of the 'real Progressive Rock'..... I don't know how old the rest of you are, but when I was a young teenager this music was fresh, I can remember listening to albums like 'In Search of the Lost Chord', 'Book of Talesyn', 'In the Court of the Crimson King' and 'ELP' with this feeling of absolute awe. Music like this had hardly existed before. Each new album brought fresh new ideas and it was all very exciting for someone who really loved music.

Then the mid-70s came and and stadium styled prog rock was popular and all these awful bands came out that were obviously pop bands capitalizing on what was a profitable trend in music, eventually these psuedo-prog bands became the pop bands that they always really were. All of my friends who were into the original progressive rock didn't care for, nor trust these bands. I still don't like these bands and consider them to be a big factor in what killed off the enthusiasm for real Progressive Rock. As a lover of true Progressive Rock it always bugs me that these bands are considered to be 'progressive' and live happily ever after on this site.


Posted By: jammun
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 22:03
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

I just sent Tao a PM, hopefully he'll come back and chat with us some day.

Now on the subject of the 'real Progressive Rock'..... I don't know how old the rest of you are, but when I was a young teenager this music was fresh, I can remember listening to albums like 'In Search of the Lost Chord', 'Book of Talesyn', 'In the Court of the Crimson King' and 'ELP' with this feeling of absolute awe. Music like this had hardly existed before. Each new album brought fresh new ideas and it was all very exciting for someone who really loved music.

Then the mid-70s came and and stadium styled prog rock was popular and all these awful bands came out that were obviously pop bands capitalizing on what was a profitable trend in music, eventually these psuedo-prog bands became the pop bands they always really were. All of my friends who were into the original progressive rock didn't care for, nor trust these bands. I still don't like these bands and consider them to be a big factor in what killed off the enthusiasm for real Progressive Rock. As a lover of true Progressive Rock it always bugs me that these bands are considered to be 'progressive' and live happily ever after on this site.
 
ClapClap
 
I'm one of the old farts.  I've tried and perhaps been successful or not to make the point that back when all the seminal music was made we only considered it really good rock.  But hell in 1967 I was thirteen years old; what did I know, other that some music was WAY more special than the other stuff.
 
The only thing I would add to the '70s aspect of it was the general diminution of the 'prog' bands themselves.  I have stated before that during the Welcome Back My Friends... tour, when I saw Emerson on the spinning piano, I saw the end of what had been known as prog.  Not that this was entirely ELP's fault...they were merely following a nasty trend of more and more extravagant shows, where the show supercedes the music.  So some might say, dude, what about the knives in the keyboards during those The Nice years?  That actually served a purpose, allowing E to engage in a bit of showmanship (a la Hendrix et. al.) with his Hammond while the knives held the keys down and engaged.  (If you follow that sentence Clap because I'm not being real clear here.) 
 
Now I have nothing against Funkadelic (not real familiar with them but I am extremely familiar with Parliament and Bootsy), but it's not prog.  Yes it's progressive funk, but then y'all better create a new Prog Funk category, at which point the 'where's Sly Stone' thread will quite rightly start immediately.
 
 
 
 


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 22:19
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

I just sent Tao a PM, hopefully he'll come back and chat with us some day.

 As a lover of true Progressive Rock it always bugs me that these bands are considered to be 'progressive' and live happily ever after on this site.


^ Clap

and that last sentence...  has aroused my curiosity...  PM me...which bands 'bug' you. That is just something I'm curious about...  doesn't need to be a topic in itself. Genre team work is a very fine line of balancing the 'true' for some... which very often is not prog.. or even progressive...  with for others...was very progressive and prog under any flexible standard of defining.. yet is not associated with the 'true' Progressive Rock. LOL


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: September 10 2008 at 02:50
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

y'all better create a new Prog Funk category, at which point the 'where's Sly Stone' thread will quite rightly start immediately.
  
 
A very good point - Sly did much the same, but a few years earlier.
 
Prog Funk - now there's an idea... LOL


-------------
The important thing is not to stop questioning.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk