Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General discussions
Forum Description: Discuss any topic at all that is not music-related
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4968 Printed Date: March 03 2025 at 11:24 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: This site is just geting too stupidPosted By: Vibrationbaby
Subject: This site is just geting too stupid
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 20:05
Every attempt I try to make to encourage intelligent reaction on this site fails with flying colours. My wife, who, after many years of hard work acquired a formal musical education thinks many of you people are basic idiots. Read her Gentle Giant Octopus review and then you will realize what a bunch of dum dums you are. my real name Ian Gledhill and her real name is Catherine Motuz.For further information e-mail me or get on contact with me through my web-site. Or better still PM me.
-------------
Replies: Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 20:08
Posted By: Fibonacci's Se
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 20:12
haah i have to agree...this site is a little more than cheesy...but i
like it for the exposure to bands id probably never hear of...so cudos
to that...
Posted By: Hierophant
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 20:16
Take away the "best of threads" and the elp wars and you have a decent forum.
Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 20:17
Hierophant wrote:
Take away the "best of threads" and the elp wars and you have a decent forum.
Posted By: Cygnus X-2
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 20:23
tuxon wrote:
Hierophant wrote:
Take away the "best of threads" and the elp wars and you have a decent forum.
But that is the forum
Else we'd be left with the silence thread
But the silent thread is so.... so.... peaceful...
-------------
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 20:34
Vibrationbaby wrote:
Every attempt I try to make to encourage intelligent reaction on this site fails with flying colours. My wife, who, after many years of hard work acquired a formal musical education thinks many of you people are basic idiots. Read her Gentle Giant Octopus review and then you will realize what a bunch of dum dums you are. my real name Ian Gledhill and her real name is Catherine Motuz.For further information e-mail me or get on contact with me through my web-site. Or better still PM me.
Posted By: frenchie
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 21:07
Topic: This site is just geting too stupid
that's cause i'm here!
------------- The Worthless Recluse
Posted By: Man With Hat
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 21:20
The ELP threads are intertaning .
------------- Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Posted By: garrett
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 21:57
I'd have to agree with you Ian. I'm new here so I have a fresh, "outsiders" perspective on his forum. The silly polls, this weird ELP thing that's everywhere, and the asinine reviews I've read here tempt me to post somewhere else. The only site left I know of that has decent daily traffic is Spock's Beard. I'm not a big SB fan so I don't have a lot of interest over there.
Any suggestions about where I can go?
***The last sentence was a total softball. Feel free to do with it what you please...hehe***
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 22:10
Hey Garrett, if the pósts are stupid and the reviews are crap, why are you here?
I wouldn't stay in a forum for a decent daily traffic if I believed that traffic is crap. There are a lot of threads that I don't like or find offensive, I give my opinion and after that leave that thread.
Don't whine, try to make a better place, if after that you are frustrated, then leave, but 11 posts are not a serious attempt of making the place better.
Iván.
-------------
Posted By: threefates
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 22:23
Hierophant wrote:
Take away the "best of threads" and the elp wars and you have a decent forum.
Actually the ELP threads were the only interesting ones here.. and not because of my love for ELP.. cause evidently they weren't threads about peoples love for ELP... but because they atleast involved some discussion... Since then its been rather boring...
------------- THIS IS ELP
Posted By: mirco
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 22:50
In Queen's words: Spread your wings and fly away... unless you enjoy to be in company of stupid people.
------------- Please forgive me for my crappy english!
Posted By: aqualung28
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 23:03
Look, we're just in a slump. Remember when we used to have all of those posts about Radiohead? That eventually calmed down as will all these polls and ELP threads. It's a natural cycle
------------- "O' lady look up in time o' lady look out of love
'n you should have us all
O' you should have us fall"
"Bill's Corpse" By Captain Beefheart
Posted By: Dan Bobrowski
Date Posted: April 07 2005 at 23:06
Hey Forest, Stupid is as stupid does.
Maybe we should, er, like, start some smarter, like, er, threads, eh? Ya know, instead of, like, ah, bitchin' about the, like, um, stupid ones, ya know?
Posted By: John Gargo
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 00:26
This thread is too intelligent for me. Damn me and my hopelessly inferior intelligence.
Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 02:21
garrett wrote:
I'd have to agree with you Ian. I'm new here so I have a fresh, "outsiders" perspective on his forum. The silly polls, this weird ELP thing that's everywhere, and the asinine reviews I've read here tempt me to post somewhere else. The only site left I know of that has decent daily traffic is Spock's Beard. I'm not a big SB fan so I don't have a lot of interest over there.
Any suggestions about where I can go?
***The last sentence was a total softball. Feel free to do with it what you please...hehe***
its a slam dunk .
Posted By: arkitek
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 02:49
it's virtually impossoble to cut out all of the stupid polls and even if nyone leaves and joins another one they will always be there every single forum that i have been on has had stupid polls etc. IMO its good the way it is
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 05:46
So come on then,why dont you do something to make it better?
You could have a poll on how to make the forum better.
Or alternatively:
1. Stop humorous posts. 2. Make everyone agree. 3.Throw out any or all of the following people:
4.Stop posts about "sensitive" subjects. 5.Only allow opinions that acknowledge that some people here:
a) are from different cultures b)have different theological viewpoints c)have different genders d)are emotionally immature e)are religious maniacs f)are obsessive fans
Here is a test to ensure suitability for this forum:
1+2=
5 ELP Dream Theatre The Holy Trinity I'm too wired to answer.
-------------
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 07:04
And no more pics !!!!!!!!!!
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 07:14
Vibrationbaby ROCKS!!!
Posted By: Alucard
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 07:53
Every attempt I try to make to encourage intelligent reaction on this site fails with flying colours. My wife, who, after many years of hard work acquired a formal musical education thinks many of you people are basic idiots. Read her Gentle Giant Octopus review and then you will realize what a bunch of dum dums you are. my real name Ian Gledhill and her real name is Catherine Motuz.For further information e-mail me or get on contact with me through my web-site. Or better still PM me.
__________________ " I don`t like people. I don`t even like
GENTLE GIANT Octopus
Review by http://www.progarchives.com/Collaborators.asp?id=22 - Catherine Motuz M.Mus (McGill) @ 1:26:52 PM EST, 5/29/2004 PROG REVIEWER
— [ANALYTICAL REVIEW because the rest of us are writing only common bull...] Gentle Giant's unique and crafty approach to making music guarantees one thing: that this band will always have a following. Their 1972 disc, "Octopus," features a wide variety of pieces, from ballads to experimental electroacoustic riff-raff come againto comments on other styles of music and poetry. Their willingness to have a lot of simultaneous musical events give a layered effect to their music: the listener has some choice what to listen to at any given time, and to hear something new each time they lay the recording. Cheesy instrumental solos???? occasionally make their way into the otherwise unique sound of the band, particularly in "The Boys in the Band" and "River," but are only a small percentage of the music on the disc and serve in any case to set off the more interesting moments.
The first track, "The Advent of Panurge" falls into the ballad category, but with a lot of twists. The first is one that permeates all of their songs: an innovative use of stereo for musical effect. Here, two singers singing at different times are accompanied each by a guitar, one at the far left, and one at the far right. We get the idea of a conversation here, even though both singers share the same text. Other twists that will come back include the alternation of time signatures, here between 4/4 and the jarring 11/8. The last twist is the virtuosic use of electronic devices from the time. Here, signal processing to change the sound of the singing voices give them a surreal quality, while different types of distortion at the same time give the listener many options what to listen to. As with most tracks on this CD, the end is not very satisfying, here not because of any musical deficiency, but because of a reticence to put enough silence between the tracks to clear the palate. The end of this song and the beginning of the next suffer both from this.
Raconteur Troubadour does a great job echoing different types of music, then blows it by announcing in their notes "we have tried to capture something of the medieval English troubadour..." The fiddle,it's not a fiddle it's just a violin while effective, is not a medieval instrument in the least, while the music after the second verse, the English processional, sounds like Edward Elgar, the late 19th-Century English composer, and not medieval in the least. I enjoyed this track for its tongue-in-cheek references, but when I got to the end and Gentle Giant's tongue came out of their cheek, I gagged. In terms of the actual playing, the trumpet playing on this track is very good indeed, though the fiddle can get thin sounding at times. I am not sure if this is the playing or the recording (or amplification?), as the string playing on all the tracks have a similar, bodiless sound. A rounder sound might have brought out better the clever mix of two main themes towards the end. I felt it a pity that with so many acoustic instruments and references to the troubadour's lute, that Gentle Giant didn't experiment with a more acoustic guitar sound. ????you mean an acoustic guitar that sounds more like an "acoustic guitar",Gary, Kerry and Ray are playing Acoustic guitar on the recordOn the other hand perhaps the slightly distorted guitar was instead an effort to marry the old and the new into one song. I would give them this benefit of the doubt if only it weren't for those silly liner notes...very analytic, indeed
A Cry for Everyone is the first instance of text that is hard to make out – the balance is a little off on this track, with the instruments a little louder than the singer. The strongest part of this tune is the call-and-answer musical interludes where again we are treated to clever stereo effects. While there is a lot of rhythmic diversity, I felt that a bit more fooling around with unexpectable rhythms would have been appropriate.As it is, A Cry for Everyone is slightly overshadowed by the more sophisticated The Advent of Panurge, which uses similar techniques.
Many composers experimenting with new sounds on synthesizers fall into the trap of thinking that the sound is interesting enough in itself to center the piece around. Not so with Gentle Giant, who weaves their electroacoustic experiments into working musical lines, and provides enough variety of sounds that we can appreciate them in contrast to one another.
Knots is described by the notes as "something of a musical jigsaw." It works! Little segments of music and text repeated over and over again create a kaleidoscope of different events, highly distinguishable by their rhythms, different instruments and ranges.
What is especially neat is that this jigsaw puzzle idea not only involves the tiny little segments, but the sections of the piece. In fact the very same music from the little contrasting bits are expanded to become sections in their own right: the xylophone that punctuates the opening finally takes off for a solo that moves back and forth through the speakers, while the longer lines become large intense blocks. These sections are most often marked by striking changes of time and rhythm, echoing a little the jazz "half-time" idiom used by artists like Dave Brubeck not long before.jazz uses "floating rhythms" not bound to bar lines unlike the polyrhythmic approach of GG, which is defenetily not comparable to "artists like Dave Brubeck".
Knots shows also that Gentle Giant is willing to play around with dynamics more than other bands – the extreme quietness and loudness serve to provide even more musical interest. I only wish they would have done more in their other pieces.
Normally I like instrumental tracks a lot, and even skip over the vocals to get to them, but The Boys in the Band, the only instrumental number here, unfortunately disappoints.The rapidly changing characters of the piece don't really compare to Knots, and the solos border on cheesy. very analytic, indeed The ensemble is tight, but I would have sacrificed it for a bit more improvisation. The electronics would have been interesting here, but for once in the whole CD, Gentle Giant loses control and there's so much stuff going on its hard to pick out even when we try.
Dog's Life, on the other hand, revels in its own musical simplicity – a very poetic link to the lyrics. The instrumentation here is very appropriate: the extremely out-of-tune regal (like a cross between bagpipes and organ) also has semantic value: the dog doesn't care for little flaws, and why should we? The xylophone and regal in the middle is very creative, but again the strings sound a little bit too much like hired extras who normally play in some second-class orchestra somewhere. ever heard of multitracking ?While the music enjoys its simplicity, its no reason not to have a little bit of soul.
My favorite track on Octopus is Think of me with Kindness, though perhaps I am biased since I've heard its beautiful tune so many times before as the later Star Trek: Voyager opening theme music.???? Again, this pieces loves simplicity (as it redundantly points out in its notes!) The singing is honest, with not a lot of technique (he runs out of breath in places), but a lot of sincerity and overall good musicianship.a great thank you in behalf of the band members
As a trombone player, I can only laud the trombone solo half-way through, trombone solo, though I would have kept the energy down a little to keep the beautiful simplicity that opens the work. For the first time on this CD, we have an effective ending,a great thank you in behalf of the band members with the words "Think of me" echoing past an unfinished musical phrase.
River came across as more of a collage than a piece of music, a lot of experimentation in electronic sounds, the most interesting of which was the flanging "wind" noises that moved from speaker to speaker creating the illusion of space. The music for the lyrics is extremely drab in contrast to the poetry, however, and the purely instrumental section falls back into standard-issue rock now and again with a not-varied-enough drumbeat and drum and guitar solos that are not particularly special. The ensemble lacks a little bit between the guitars on occasion, bits of feedback left in distract from the more purposeful electroacoustics, and everything has a veil of distortion that, while looking into the future, reminds us how bleak the music of the 80s really was!
While the quality shifts from track to track, overall Octopus makes for an excellent listen, one step up from the 1971 album Acquiring the taste, which also experiments with electroacoustics, simultaneous musical events, and interesting orchestrations, but to less of a degree. I sometimes feel that Octopus' tracks would be better served as miniatures – breaking into something a little more upbeat/standard-issue in the middle of most pieces risk taking away from the uniqueness of each work. Overall, however, Gentle Giant excels at never losing our interest by providing constant variety of sounds, effects, lyric style, texture and dynamics both within and between pieces.
But do ditch some of the liner notes – they take what was clever and make it redundant...
Catherine Motuz M.Mus (McGill)
Vibrationbaby thank you so much for pointing out your wife's...ANALYTICAL REVIEW.For me there's is a big difference between showing of and intelligence. I might prefer to remain a basic idiot.
yours truly
Alucard
Posted By: Alucard
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 07:59
Velvetclown wrote:
And no more pics !!!!!!!!!!
You basic idiot!
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 08:01
Idiot ? fine, but Basic ???
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Alucard
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 08:04
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 08:18
Velvetclown wrote:
Idiot ? fine, but Basic ???
Now Now boys & girls.
Posted By: John Gargo
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 09:56
Oh my god, this thread is genius!!!
Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 10:59
nobody likes a smart-ass...but the spelling in the thread title is ironic. Maybe it was on purpose?
anyway, I agree. But nothing good lasts forever. The glory days (I only caught the tail end of them when I joined) are pretty much past, now we must look to the future and do what we can to preserve what we value.
My question: did the site go downhill before or after the Mariah thread was moved?
Posted By: Alucard
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 11:13
Before or after..that is the question..
Posted By: arkitek
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 11:32
hahahahahaha now he looks like a basic idiot!
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 11:33
Hey! You saying there's something wrong is stupid people?!
*is offended* I'll see you at the nearest pub, sunset... I'll bring the Rocky movie soundtrack, you just bring yourself. *goes andfinds some steps to run up and down in prepration*
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 12:52
Alucard wrote:
GENTLE GIANT Octopus Review by http://www.progarchives.com/Collaborators.asp?id=22 - Catherine Motuz M.Mus (McGill) @ 1:26:52 PM EST, 5/29/2004 PROG REVIEWER
— [ANALYTICAL REVIEW because the rest of us are writing only common bull...] Gentle Giant's unique and crafty approach to making music guarantees one thing: that this band will always have a following. Their 1972 disc, "Octopus," features a wide variety of pieces, from ballads to experimental electroacoustic riff-raff come againto comments on other styles of music and poetry. Their willingness to have a lot of simultaneous musical events give a layered effect to their music: the listener has some choice what to listen to at any given time, and to hear something new each time they lay the recording. Cheesy instrumental solos???? occasionally make their way into the otherwise unique sound of the band, particularly in "The Boys in the Band" and "River," but are only a small percentage of the music on the disc and serve in any case to set off the more interesting moments.
The first track, "The Advent of Panurge" falls into the ballad category, but with a lot of twists. The first is one that permeates all of their songs: an innovative use of stereo for musical effect. Here, two singers singing at different times are accompanied each by a guitar, one at the far left, and one at the far right. We get the idea of a conversation here, even though both singers share the same text. Other twists that will come back include the alternation of time signatures, here between 4/4 and the jarring 11/8. The last twist is the virtuosic use of electronic devices from the time. Here, signal processing to change the sound of the singing voices give them a surreal quality, while different types of distortion at the same time give the listener many options what to listen to. As with most tracks on this CD, the end is not very satisfying, here not because of any musical deficiency, but because of a reticence to put enough silence between the tracks to clear the palate. The end of this song and the beginning of the next suffer both from this.
Raconteur Troubadour does a great job echoing different types of music, then blows it by announcing in their notes "we have tried to capture something of the medieval English troubadour..." The fiddle,it's not a fiddle it's just a violin while effective, is not a medieval instrument in the least, while the music after the second verse, the English processional, sounds like Edward Elgar, the late 19th-Century English composer, and not medieval in the least. I enjoyed this track for its tongue-in-cheek references, but when I got to the end and Gentle Giant's tongue came out of their cheek, I gagged. In terms of the actual playing, the trumpet playing on this track is very good indeed, though the fiddle can get thin sounding at times. I am not sure if this is the playing or the recording (or amplification?), as the string playing on all the tracks have a similar, bodiless sound. A rounder sound might have brought out better the clever mix of two main themes towards the end. I felt it a pity that with so many acoustic instruments and references to the troubadour's lute, that Gentle Giant didn't experiment with a more acoustic guitar sound. ????you mean an acoustic guitar that sounds more like an "acoustic guitar",Gary, Kerry and Ray are playing Acoustic guitar on the recordOn the other hand perhaps the slightly distorted guitar was instead an effort to marry the old and the new into one song. I would give them this benefit of the doubt if only it weren't for those silly liner notes...very analytic, indeed
A Cry for Everyone is the first instance of text that is hard to make out – the balance is a little off on this track, with the instruments a little louder than the singer. The strongest part of this tune is the call-and-answer musical interludes where again we are treated to clever stereo effects. While there is a lot of rhythmic diversity, I felt that a bit more fooling around with unexpectable rhythms would have been appropriate.As it is, A Cry for Everyone is slightly overshadowed by the more sophisticated The Advent of Panurge, which uses similar techniques.
Many composers experimenting with new sounds on synthesizers fall into the trap of thinking that the sound is interesting enough in itself to center the piece around. Not so with Gentle Giant, who weaves their electroacoustic experiments into working musical lines, and provides enough variety of sounds that we can appreciate them in contrast to one another.
Knots is described by the notes as "something of a musical jigsaw." It works! Little segments of music and text repeated over and over again create a kaleidoscope of different events, highly distinguishable by their rhythms, different instruments and ranges.
What is especially neat is that this jigsaw puzzle idea not only involves the tiny little segments, but the sections of the piece. In fact the very same music from the little contrasting bits are expanded to become sections in their own right: the xylophone that punctuates the opening finally takes off for a solo that moves back and forth through the speakers, while the longer lines become large intense blocks. These sections are most often marked by striking changes of time and rhythm, echoing a little the jazz "half-time" idiom used by artists like Dave Brubeck not long before.jazz uses "floating rhythms" not bound to bar lines unlike the polyrhythmic approach of GG, which is defenetily not comparable to "artists like Dave Brubeck".
Knots shows also that Gentle Giant is willing to play around with dynamics more than other bands – the extreme quietness and loudness serve to provide even more musical interest. I only wish they would have done more in their other pieces.
Normally I like instrumental tracks a lot, and even skip over the vocals to get to them, but The Boys in the Band, the only instrumental number here, unfortunately disappoints.The rapidly changing characters of the piece don't really compare to Knots, and the solos border on cheesy. very analytic, indeed The ensemble is tight, but I would have sacrificed it for a bit more improvisation. The electronics would have been interesting here, but for once in the whole CD, Gentle Giant loses control and there's so much stuff going on its hard to pick out even when we try.
Dog's Life, on the other hand, revels in its own musical simplicity – a very poetic link to the lyrics. The instrumentation here is very appropriate: the extremely out-of-tune regal (like a cross between bagpipes and organ) also has semantic value: the dog doesn't care for little flaws, and why should we? The xylophone and regal in the middle is very creative, but again the strings sound a little bit too much like hired extras who normally play in some second-class orchestra somewhere. ever heard of multitracking ?While the music enjoys its simplicity, its no reason not to have a little bit of soul.
My favorite track on Octopus is Think of me with Kindness, though perhaps I am biased since I've heard its beautiful tune so many times before as the later Star Trek: Voyager opening theme music.???? Again, this pieces loves simplicity (as it redundantly points out in its notes!) The singing is honest, with not a lot of technique (he runs out of breath in places), but a lot of sincerity and overall good musicianship.a great thank you in behalf of the band members
As a trombone player, I can only laud the trombone solo half-way through, trombone solo, though I would have kept the energy down a little to keep the beautiful simplicity that opens the work. For the first time on this CD, we have an effective ending,a great thank you in behalf of the band members with the words "Think of me" echoing past an unfinished musical phrase.
River came across as more of a collage than a piece of music, a lot of experimentation in electronic sounds, the most interesting of which was the flanging "wind" noises that moved from speaker to speaker creating the illusion of space. The music for the lyrics is extremely drab in contrast to the poetry, however, and the purely instrumental section falls back into standard-issue rock now and again with a not-varied-enough drumbeat and drum and guitar solos that are not particularly special. The ensemble lacks a little bit between the guitars on occasion, bits of feedback left in distract from the more purposeful electroacoustics, and everything has a veil of distortion that, while looking into the future, reminds us how bleak the music of the 80s really was!
While the quality shifts from track to track, overall Octopus makes for an excellent listen, one step up from the 1971 album Acquiring the taste, which also experiments with electroacoustics, simultaneous musical events, and interesting orchestrations, but to less of a degree. I sometimes feel that Octopus' tracks would be better served as miniatures – breaking into something a little more upbeat/standard-issue in the middle of most pieces risk taking away from the uniqueness of each work. Overall, however, Gentle Giant excels at never losing our interest by providing constant variety of sounds, effects, lyric style, texture and dynamics both within and between pieces.
But do ditch some of the liner notes – they take what was clever and make it redundant...
Catherine Motuz M.Mus (McGill)
Vibrationbaby thank you so much for pointing out your wife's...ANALYTICAL REVIEW.For me there's is a big difference between showing of and intelligence. I might prefer to remain a basic idiot.
yours truly
Alucard
I was trying to write something similar, but I'm only a basic Latin idiot (Well, not so basic) that doesn't speak or write perfect English as basic USA or British idiot so my lack of intelligence mixed with my bad use of a foreign language (Don't ask me to learn perfect English because I'm an idiot) doesn't allow me to choose the perfect words.
But my silly and useless point of view is that this good technical review may be useful to Orchestra Directors or people who have many years of formal musical education (Something you can't expect in a place full of basic idiots), but the common fan that reads a review doesn't has the slightest idea about "experimental electroacoustic riff-raffs" or the difference between4/4 and the jarring 11/8.
The common reader (probably also an idiot), wants to know if he should expend his 10 or 20 bucks in an album (Big amount of money for any idiot who earns a small salary in their simple works) or if the band sounds like Yes or ELP, who are their main influences and if the reviewer likes the album. but nothing of this is said in the review.
I find this review good for a musical expert and ideal to impress your Contemporary Music teacher, very technical, well elaborated from that perspective, but lack of soul, for most of us is enough that the lyrics and the music must say something or move us, despite if it's written in 4/4 or the jarring 11/4.
Iván
BTW: What in hell does jarring means?
Iván
-------------
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: April 08 2005 at 12:58
James : AFTER !
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: April 09 2005 at 05:33
Posted By: Alucard
Date Posted: April 09 2005 at 09:23
ivan_2068 wrote:
But my silly and useless point of view is that this good technical review may be useful to Orchestra Directors or people who have many years of formal musical education (Something you can't expect in a place full of basic idiots), but the common fan that reads a review doesn't has the slightest idea about "experimental electroacoustic riff-raffs" or the difference between4/4 and the jarring 11/8.
Iván
BTW: What in hell does jarring means?
Iván
Iván, I am not quiet sure that Orchestral directors understand experimental electroacoustic riff-raffs" or the difference between4/4 and the jarring 11/8 either.
Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: April 09 2005 at 09:48
Evidence the site is NOT getting too stupid: for the first time in many months, Peter's name is howing up multiple times on the recent posts of the main page. Is the slumbering giant awakening, preparing a grammatically-correct post onslaught unseen since, oh, early 2004?
I for one, welcome it...but I also dread the inevitable backlash and withdrawl.
Posted By: dude
Date Posted: April 09 2005 at 10:14
YOU MEAN TO SAY PETER IS REALLY A SLUMBERING GIANT ?..OH NO!!! THIS ENORMOUS MAN WILL DEVOUR US ALL!!!!.
GET THE ARMY, OR THE NAVY!!!! NUKE HIM,GET CLINT EASTWOOD
BUT SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING!!!
IF ANYONE NEEDS ME I WILL BE COWERING IN AN UNDERGROUND BUNKER
Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: April 09 2005 at 10:47
James Lee wrote:
Evidence the site is NOT getting too stupid: for the first time in many months, Peter's name is howing up multiple times on the recent posts of the main page. Is the slumbering giant awakening, preparing a grammatically-correct post onslaught unseen since, oh, early 2004?
I for one, welcome it...but I also dread the inevitable backlash and withdrawl.
Howdy thare, pawdner!
------------- "And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: April 09 2005 at 10:48
dude wrote:
YOU MEAN TO SAY PETER IS REALLY A SLUMBERING GIANT ?..OH NO!!! THIS ENORMOUS MAN WILL DEVOUR US ALL!!!!.
GET THE ARMY, OR THE NAVY!!!! NUKE HIM,GET CLINT EASTWOOD
BUT SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING!!!
IF ANYONE NEEDS ME I WILL BE COWERING IN AN UNDERGROUND BUNKER
^ Is funny man, no?
------------- "And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
Posted By: Jeshua
Date Posted: April 09 2005 at 10:54
You know its your choice to come here vibration so if its stupid just
leave. I mean i know im an idiot, but the rest of these people seem
like they know a lot about prog and have great senses of humor. You
know everything doesn't have to be serious...have some fun.
------------- Fast car, on the highway, on the biway, Mr. Robotron -Mr . Devil
Posted By: arcer
Date Posted: April 09 2005 at 11:23
It's the stupidity that keeps me checking in as often
as I now can.....
Just as it's:
the intelligence
the wit
the vitriol
the insults
the smart-assedness
the expertise
the help
the advice
the humour
but most of all it's the dumb-asses who post....
including me
If it was serious all the time then the whole thing
would just be a snorefest of worthy comment and
overly technical nonsense (no offence Vibe).
I love watching Citizen Kane but sometimes long for
the Marx Brothers too....
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: April 09 2005 at 11:27
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: April 09 2005 at 11:47
Wot, Peter's back?!
Dam, wear did I put that dicshunry and Thesawrus, he'll tare my posts to threds if I dont use them.