Contrarian
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Help us improve the site
Forum Description: Help us improve the forums, and the site as a whole
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=49176
Printed Date: December 02 2024 at 13:51 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Contrarian
Posted By: The Wizard
Subject: Contrarian
Date Posted: June 04 2008 at 11:59
Is this a joke? When will true progressive rock be featured on the front page of this website, not this retro cheese?
-------------
|
Replies:
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: June 04 2008 at 13:40
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: June 04 2008 at 14:11
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: June 04 2008 at 14:48
I guess the great bands don't need this type of publicity as much as all these minor developing bands... Too bad the first was was an utter bore... I don't know about CONTRARIAN but to answer the question, I guess the big names won't come here any time soon...
-------------
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: June 04 2008 at 16:22
The Wizard wrote:
Is this a joke? When will true progressive rock be featured on the front page of this website, not this retro cheese? |
When they pay the money to be featured, absolutely. ;-)
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: Luke. J
Date Posted: June 05 2008 at 00:16
To be honest, I will not complain as long as I do not have to see T***** M*** any more..
And, who knows, maybe there will someday be a promising band.. as long as not, do not listen more than once to the samples..
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: June 05 2008 at 07:36
I'll give a sample a try at some point. Couldn't make it all the way through the first Maxt sample.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Trademark
Date Posted: June 05 2008 at 14:32
I like retro cheese. Keep up the good work.
|
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: June 05 2008 at 16:41
got curious... listening to the two songs on the main page...
.
------------- The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: June 05 2008 at 16:49
hahhaha
not passing judgment on the group... but will say.. in case they are watching and listening...
fire the singer.... whatever concept you had is lost on these ears ... the vocals are wretched... my first thought is LaBrie kind of bad.
and get yourself a damned Hammond Organ and dttch that cheesy keyboard sound
everything I hate about modern prog... sterile sounding. no grit... no FIRE... but other than that... sounds good hhahhahha keep it up.. Sounding like everyone else out there today is a sure path to nowhere.
edit... did give them another listen.. a definite step up from last month... but they need to really get an identity and a sound their own...
as some wise soul said one time... there is nothing.. NOTHING worse than Bad prog...
this isn't bad... but it only rises to the next level..
there is nothing ... NOTHING less inspiring than generic run of the milll prog.
Prog... is the root of PROGRESSIVE.. progress.. move forward. do something.
------------- The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
Posted By: Rivertree
Date Posted: June 05 2008 at 17:52
Two hearts and one soul ....
Basically this is a matter of taste, of course - but on the other hand there are a lot of bands which are more appealing to me deserving a promotion ...
------------- https://awesomeprog.com/users/Rivertree" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: debrewguy
Date Posted: June 05 2008 at 19:07
Just a couple of notes here ... first, it's nice to see that there isn't a moratorium in place against bad reviews on this advertised album; second, it's not a bad place to TRY to expose your music if you ( I mean the band) believe that your music can be identified as within that narrowest of narrow genres () - prog ; Thirds - to make this ad spot attractive in the future, could we maybe make our criticism more helpful ? Would it hurt to make the attempt to identify, if at all possible, the positives ? Then, as Torman Maxt and this group seem to indicate, if the "product" isn't quite there, could we not just offer suggestions on what they could build on, improve or work on to hopefully come out with a better release the next time around ? This may seem small potatoes now, and yeah, we shouldn't expect the big prog names to be booking ad space at PA anytime soon; but is there anyone here who can't see the possibilities ? Support the scene. There's no need for mollycoddling, but a little helping hand from those here at PA who can share some of their expansive knowledge, and a tiny shard of enthusiasm from the rest of us who are fans of the genre isn't much to ask, is it ? So Torman Maxt's album does not hold a candle to 2112 as they thought it might. Can we offer insight on what they could have refined further, or encourage them to expand on the parts that offered some potential ?
Just a thought ... from one who knows all too well how easy it can be to go negative in a big way (unecessarily so at times).
------------- "Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: June 06 2008 at 02:45
It's not a question of wanting to be negative at all costs. As far as I am concerned, I am always willing to give ANYONE a chance - and believe me, in the two years I've been a SC, I've screened a lot of bands and artists for addition, finding quite a few of them worthy of further investigation. However, those guys (I can't say anything about T.M., not having listened to their material) have what in my eyes is the biggest flaw in music... They are boring and unoriginal - which doesn't mean they can't play or anything of the sort. Therefore, I wholeheartedly endorse what Micky and Uwe said in their previous posts.
Just to briefly touch on another subject that has been mentioned by some of the posters, quality has NOTHING to do with being a 'big prog name'. Some of the acts we have screened for addition in the former Art Rock categories had barely a CD to their credit, but their music was already very interesting, even exhilarating in some cases. It's true that we have sometimes added bands that sounded tired and uninspired, but the overall quality of the new acts we have been submitted was far higher - as well as their progressive quotient.
|
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: June 06 2008 at 20:55
Ghost Rider wrote:
It's not a question of wanting to be negative at all costs. As far as I am concerned, I am always willing to give ANYONE a chance - and believe me, in the two years I've been a SC, I've screened a lot of bands and artists for addition, finding quite a few of them worthy of further investigation. However, those guys (I can't say anything about T.M., not having listened to their material) have what in my eyes is the biggest flaw in music... They are boring and unoriginal - which doesn't mean they can't play or anything of the sort. Therefore, I wholeheartedly endorse what Micky and Uwe said in their previous posts.
|
well said Raff... we do screen a LOT of new groups that come in through AR... and these guys are not bad... they are just lacking originality... I think it is constructive criticism to point that out. Unless you ARE original.. or have something to put you above or set you apart from all the others out there.. this group is not going to go anywhere.
listen to this group.. then something like Gaylord... then tell me who has a better chance to still be playing music and not selling copy machines in five years hahahha
------------- The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: June 06 2008 at 22:44
micky wrote:
Gaylord |
I had never heard of these guys before, thanks for mentioning them, they're really good, although I don't think that name is good for their marketing, hahaha.
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: June 06 2008 at 23:13
Posted By: Dim
Date Posted: June 06 2008 at 23:23
I'm all up for putting some attention on an artist, but I think we should aim for the ones with less of a 70's sound, and go for the ones who are a bit off the grind, and original, or at least portray some form of originality...
-------------
|
Posted By: rileydog22
Date Posted: June 06 2008 at 23:28
schizoid_man77 wrote:
I'm all up for putting some attention on an artist, but I think we should aim for the ones with less of a 70's sound, and go for the ones who are a bit off the grind, and original, or at least portray some form of originality... |
Yeah, but most Avant bands are broke
-------------
|
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: June 06 2008 at 23:32
^ well as has been pointed out...we don't pick them... they are paying for the spot.. .we aren't exactly 'spotlighting' recommended groups.. just groups with an open checkbook so M@X can make a few bucks I guess.
Maybe in July we'll give something more deserving a spotlight here. .something as you said... 'who are a bit off the grind, and original, or at least portray some form of originality'.
nice Ian
------------- The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 01:40
Well, i just listetened to their samples and while I agree it's not too original (and the voice is kind of weak) it's way better than our previous feautured artist. (I had some pleasure reviewing it though...)...No, really, at least these CONTRARIAn represent the spirit of prog.. maybe retro prog but PROG.... one day we will probably have an "avant garde" band as featured artist.. but remember: "avant garde" artists usually hate being labeled as anything, including as "prog", so I don't think that many of them will come asking for the deal with mailto:M@x - M@x ...... Expect that slot to be occupied mostly by bands that sound like typical prog...
-------------
|
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 01:47
Teo, the bands I mentioned in my above post were not so much avant-garde as ORIGINAL. There is a big difference between these two concepts. I'm sure other people on PA will scoff at anything that is not avant-garde, but not people like me. I'm not an Avant fan, and I know very little about the subgenre, but I do like some originality with my music. Though retro-prog is perfectly OK with me, let's face it.. not everyone is Spock's Beard, Transatlantic or The Tangent.
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 01:57
Seems we want to be unhappy at any cost.
- If we have Religious and unrelated advertising, everybody complained..
- If PA receives PROGRESSIVE ROCK ADVERTISING, people want their favorite band or genre.
Please guys, what do you want?
- Not Symphonic, because it's retro
- Not Neo because it's lame
- Not Avant because not everybody likes it
- Not Prog Metal because Dream Theaqter is not Popular.
Give Prog Archives a chance, Contrarian is being supported, but they are supporting the site also, they are helping to pay the bills.
CONTRARIAN is IMO an excellent band, of course they have influences of the 70's, FOR GOD'S SAKE, THIS IS HARD PROG WITH SYMPHONIC LEANINGS...IT HAS TO SOUND INFLUENCED BY 70's BANDS!!!!
I love Symphonic and like it or not, what some call retro Prog is the most popular sound in this site, if you make a poll, probably the bands sounding like in the 70's will win in popularity by far.
Contrarian dares to use influences, but they don't clone anybody, they take this influence and work it in a different and more aggressive way, they keep the spirit of USA Prog but dare to be adventurous.
I believe it's a real promissing band, the funny thing is that when HT added them everybody agreed we were talking about a solid Prog band, but now that is featured, everybody has something to say against them.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 02:27
Ivan, I didn't mean to cause you any distress, or to undermine the work of your team.... I didn't even know who had added Contrarian, so my opinion is totally unbiased, and based exclusively on the music I heard - which didn't exactly set me on fire. However, I never said they shouldn't be featured, or anything like that, and I think my own posts were calm and respectful (unlike some others).
|
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 03:04
Well said Ivan, mailto:M@x - M@x efforts to make to advertising on the site more relevant are to be applauded and encouraged.
|
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 08:23
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Seems we want to be unhappy at any cost.
- If we have Religious and unrelated advertising, everybody complained..
- If PA receives PROGRESSIVE ROCK ADVERTISING, people want their favorite band or genre.
Please guys, what do you want?
- Not Symphonic, because it's retro
- Not Neo because it's lame
- Not Avant because not everybody likes it
- Not Prog Metal because Dream Theaqter is not Popular.
Give Prog Archives a chance, Contrarian is being supported, but they are supporting the site also, they are helping to pay the bills.
CONTRARIAN is IMO an excellent band, of course they have influences of the 70's, FOR GOD'S SAKE, THIS IS HARD PROG WITH SYMPHONIC LEANINGS...IT HAS TO SOUND INFLUENCED BY 70's BANDS!!!!
I love Symphonic and like it or not, what some call retro Prog is the most popular sound in this site, if you make a poll, probably the bands sounding like in the 70's will win in popularity by far.
Contrarian dares to use influences, but they don't clone anybody, they take this influence and work it in a different and more aggressive way, they keep the spirit of USA Prog but dare to be adventurous.
I believe it's a real promissing band, the funny thing is that when HT added them everybody agreed we were talking about a solid Prog band, but now that is featured, everybody has something to say against them.
Iván |
Honestly Ivan... I'm a bit disappointed... I hope the group at least understands the difference between constructive criticism and flaming for the hell of it. You like them... that's great... several of us that have spoken up have not said they are a bad group... but instead offer advice and feedback geared to help them in our opinions. Don't take it so personal
re: the finanical side.. .we all know the story on that... 'paying the bills' doesn't wash. M@X is free to earn what he can... but we all know that this is more than just keeping PA's afloat and the survival of our beloved site. That was made clear to us.
------------- The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 11:06
Ghost Rider wrote:
Ivan, I didn't mean to cause you any distress, or to undermine the work of your team.... I didn't even know who had added Contrarian, so my opinion is totally unbiased, and based exclusively on the music I heard - which didn't exactly set me on fire. However, I never said they shouldn't be featured, or anything like that, and I think my own posts were calm and respectful (unlike some others). |
Your commentary was positive Raff, I know we will not agree with something and you know I fought for that, and this is not the problem.
Phrases like "Retro Cheese" are offensive and uncalled, yes, I like music with roots in the 60's and 70's, normally I don't like Avant (Well, as everybody knows I fought for the addition of Factor Burzaco which I believe is pure genius), and that makes me no less proghead than anybody.
Others say: " but I think we should aim for the ones with less of a 70's sound, and go for the ones who are a bit off the grind, and original, or at least portray some form of originality"
The question is why? Because this person doesn't like 70's oriented bands? Well, most people here like 70's oriented Prog much more than anything else, and we should accept any Prog band who wants to invest,. doesn't matter if they sound as in the 60's or 00's, as long as we can express our opinion, there should be no problem.
Personally I would point towards these bands, because this is the sound I like more, but that'ds not the point, we should promote and support every form, style and sub-genre of Prog, without any limit.
What do this guys want? Google based propaganda of unknown churches or X rated sites as we had to accept before?
Some time ago a group of Dream Theater fans though they had the only truth, now some fans of more adventurous Prog are looking traditionally oriented bands as if they were second class, this is absurd, Prog is Prog, some is good, some is band, I believe CONTRARIAN is really good but agree to disagree, that's not the problem.
micky wrote:
Honestly Ivan... I'm a bit disappointed... I hope the group at least understands the difference between constructive criticism and flaming for the hell of it. You like them... that's great... several of us that have spoken up have not said they are a bad group... but instead offer advice and feedback geared to help them in our opinions. Don't take it so personal |
Micky, don't be disappointed, I'm in favor of multiple tastes, that's what Prog is about, but I see people judging CONTRARIAN without haven't heard more than two samples, but what is worst, questioning them as being not worthy of receive advertising by us.....Hey, people is not knocking at our doors begging us to give them a spot, mailto:M@X - has to search for supporters, we're N° 1 Prog site in the net, but there are lots of musical sites with more visits than us outside the Prog universe.
micky wrote:
re: the finanical side.. .we all know the story on that... 'paying the bills' doesn't wash. M@X is free to earn what he can... but we all know that this is more than just keeping PA's afloat and the survival of our beloved site. That was made clear to us.
|
Believe me Micky, it's just keeping the site alive, the whole world is in crisis, I been trying to help mailto:M@X - with some advertising (without asking for a dime, just in case), I talked for example with Viajero Inmovil Records who manage Factor Burzaco because I made a good personal connection with the owner of the label, and they simply can't afford the US$ 100.00 a month of propaganda because the situation in our part of the world is critic, we pay 10 times the taxes than anybody else, they just can't do it now.
Big bands (which are not always the best) won't invest directly in advertising, they allow their labels do that for them and believe me, most big labels just don't care about the Prog sites to advertise them, they rather pay a spot in Rolling Stones because they sell millions of copies.
We have to stay with new bands willing to take the risk (we are a risk also) and with some money to spend, and we must be proud that bands like Glass Hammer or CONTRARIAN who are considered by many as part of the peak of USA Prog trust us.
And this is excellent, we are supporting new bands, the future of Prog, like it or not, CONTRARIAN will be one of the biggest new acts, they are doing things right and have the talent, some will like them, others won't, what the hell, some people hate Genesis or ELP despite they are icons.
By my side I can't be happier this guys are placing their trust in us, because they could also had gone to other non Prog sites that have the same number or more visits than us, and believe me, they would had got some thousand albums sold also.
Lets thank those who trust in us and support all Prog, and if you believe you can do it better, go take the chance and search for some propaganda.
BTW: Listen all CONTRARIAN album before giving an opinion.
-------------
|
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 12:02
Re the cost comment Micky.
As you may have seen elsewhere, it has been suggested that the server needs upgrading again. That's just one of the many costs mailto:M@x - M@x looks after for us without ever calling upon us for contributions.
|
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 12:51
^ very true... personally I don't have a problem with this kind of revenue income.. as long as no perferential treatment is accorded the group. Flames should be extinguished.. as they always should be... but rational feedback that is not exactly glowing is fair game. Some here aren't privy to what has gone on and been discussed.. and might think that this site is actively promoting these groups.. rather than allowing them to purchase the space to let their music promote itself.
------------- The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 13:53
micky wrote:
Some here aren't privy to what has gone on and been discussed.. and might think that this site is actively promoting these groups.. rather than allowing them to purchase the space to let their music promote itself. |
Here I have a friendly disagreement Micky, if Prog doesn't have the site that deserves in the world musical context is because lack of support, what we MUST do here is essentially support new bands if we want Prog to survive.
Of course support with absolute freedom and respect, we won’t say a band is great if we believe they suck, but we can always find something good in every band, and if they also support us….much better, it’s a symbiotic relation for the good of Prog.
We’ve done this a lot of times, for example last year I received the album “Dreamer” by Anton Roolaart, I made an honest review in which I said the music is outstanding but the voice is hard to get in, he published the review in his site equally and despite my comment, because we are here to say our truth and ghe accepted it.
But we also gained something, we were the ONLY Prog site in the world to add Anton Roolaart and review “Dreamer” the exact day of it’s world official debut, I still receive some comments from Anton who I see as a friend.
The same goes with bands as Shadow Circus or even bands I didn’t liked too much like Er. J. Orchestra or Rumblin Orchestra, but they are Prog bands so I felt my duty to support them, won’t give them a 5 stars rating, but tried to be 100% honest without prejudices.
There’s nothing wrong in supporting new artists, it’s a duty for those of us who love Prog, I don’t understand people who write pages of pages insisting for Boston or Toto which at the most are tangentially related Prog (I believe not even that) and don’t need our support, but this same people feel embarrassed to support 100% PROG BANDS that deserve and NEED our help.
Years ago I used to talk with Lynette from The Red Masque, a fabulous Avant Band from Philadelphia, who told me how they were at the border of quitting because simply there was no support.
Timothy Boney from CONTRARIAN has to work in the legal area furing the day because there’s not enough support for the artists, he could be using all his available time to be even better, but he has to live and has a family, why can't we promote them with the truth?
I see no problem in supporting new artists, as a fact I feel it’s our duty.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 14:05
we do support them Ivan... and sometimes the best support is telling them what them may not want to hear... as I said.. compare them to others out there making new prog.. and they come up on the short end of the stick.. and groups like that ..if they aren't extremely talented or can put themselves above others by doing something new.. or different are just going to be crushed and forgotten. To me that is supporting a group far more than blind applause now.. and forgetting them in a month or two.
Prog will only survive Ivan.. by expanding the horizons.. not by putting out generic been there and done that stuff. When that happens.. prog becomes as fomulamatic and simple as the pop music we all love to sh*t upon. That is why I promote groups that I just don't like.. but also groups ..and there are a lot of them these days .. that are taking new and different musical influences and creating something new with it. Just as they did in the 70's.
------------- The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 14:34
micky wrote:
we do support them Ivan... and sometimes the best support is telling them what them may not want to hear... as I said.. compare them to others out there making new prog.. and they come up on the short end of the stick.. and groups like that ..if they aren't extremely talented or can put themselves above others by doing something new.. or different are just going to be crushed and forgotten. To me that is supporting a group far more than blind applause now.. and forgetting them in a month or two. |
Giving opinions is necesary, I never chalenged that, but calling them retro Prog just because we believe that anything remotely inspired in the past is bad, is wrong.
As I said neither I give a blind applause, to say the truth, but also to guive them a place where to promote what they are doing, like it or not.
And fogetting them is not my style Micky, I keep in contact with most of the bands I added and which whom I made contact, I don't believe Contrarian is going to be crushed and forgotten, they are doing what most Progheads like and they are doing it very well, but this is only my perspactive.
micky wrote:
Prog will only survive Ivan.. by expanding the horizons.. not by putting out generic been there and done that stuff. When that happens.. prog becomes as fomulamatic and simple as the pop music we all love to sh*t upon. |
Not necesarilly Micky, Prog doesn't have to change for everybody, Prog can be reinvented, Anglagard and Par Lindh Project did it in the 90's when most of the people believed Prog was dead...Did they made something new? No, they went more radically classic, and they are icons.
There are bands who are expanding Symphonic, take Deluge Grander for example, they are absolutely respectful to the 70's but they are also doing something new, re-inventing Symphonic in the 21st Century, that's also a way of making Prog.
micky wrote:
That is why I promote groups that I just don't like.. but also groups ..and there are a lot of them these days .. that are taking new and different musical influences and creating something new with it. Just as they did in the 70's.
|
Why do they need to change? Some wil and some won't, I believe Prog is wide enough for everybody, I love Symphonic Prog from Eastern Europe, and they are creating nothing radically new, they just take good old Symphonic, blend it with their natural ethnic sound and re-invent a new fresh sound.
Some people like old Melodic Prog, we don't need to like ultra complex structures or radically new things, some will and some won't, as simple as that, and I believe we must promote and support all of them.
Almost everything hads been done in music, there's nothing absolutely new under the sun, everybody has an influence, and who else will a Prog band search as influence than another Prog band?
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 18:36
As I said before, and Raf I think you misunderstood me, the bands that most likely will continue to want to make deals with PA are retro-prog bands, for a simple reason: they don't mind 9and they're quite honoured actually) by being labeled "prog", unlike many of those who are a bit off the grind, and original, or at least portray some form of originality" . In the end, the bands that keep prog's flame alive are, mostly, retro bands, neo bands, or prog-metal (traditional) bands... In most cases, other kind of groups will actually dislike being associated with the term "prog" or with any label. So, yes!, a more original band could be our featured artist, but we should be happy with what we have. Torman Maxt was a disaster (it has received the ratings it deserves) but it was the first. now CONTRARIAN is a much better band and, most importantly, comes in much better terms (no censorship) so i think this complaining, for once, doesn't have my full support, as I know that the "prog artist of the month" will always have to be one that doesn't fear being called one.
-------------
|
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 18:48
I see a problem with the heading: "Featured Artist". In fact it's really just advertising, but to the typical visitor it seems like the album or artist is some kind of editorial recommendation. That can lead to much disappointment and/or confusion, when people check out the music and find that it's only average quality. No insult intended ... as I said, the big expectation comes from how the album is currently presented. A simple banner with a *short* text might actually be more effective.
------------- https://awesomeprog.com/users/Mike" rel="nofollow">Recently listened to:
|
Posted By: debrewguy
Date Posted: June 07 2008 at 18:55
Constructive criticism. Oops, kinda late. Anyway, I just thought of something. While most groups, new ones included, will attract buyers that for one reason or another believe there may be something of interest to them in the music. So if I've read a review describing band X as Symphonic or Neo-Prog, and I am not a fan of those genres, I'm not likely to go out and get it. The relevancy of this comment refers to the fact that any one browsing PA can give a listen to Contrarian and give their opinion. Which is O.K. . Except that you're going to get some who don't care for the band's style or genre (retro-prog / gorp-orter, whatever) who are going to want to come forward with their view. We have had threads debating the usefulness or fairness of reviewing groups that are outside of our usual tastes, or that we may actually dislike. Something as to why this might skew ratings. But in this case here, it should be more about seeing if band X is enjoyable to folks who like their sort of music. Heaven knows, if we ever get a RIO/Avant-Garde group advertising in this space, that we would have a heated debate as to whether those who don't "get" it should bother reviewing such an artistically validated genre as R/A-G.
------------- "Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
Posted By: Yorkie X
Date Posted: June 08 2008 at 10:50
I got the MP3 version of the CD from the link this site gave me awhile ago (MP3 version was only about $5 so I took the gamble why not) this band isn't bad in places they are very good actually they seem to know how to play good quality American home grown type prog when they want to but the vocals took me some time to get used to , the only thing I dislike about them is their tendency to go boogy woogy in southern style rock style when they run dry of ideas but few bands are perfect so unless you have heard the CD I believe you should either get it or refrain from judging them , the two tracks we have here to listen to are not two of the better ones. Seriously I would recommend this CD to especially Proto Kaw and Kansas fans ;) good band could easily progress to very good they have the ingredients to. its Worth $5 easily
|
Posted By: Failcore
Date Posted: June 17 2008 at 21:28
Heh, just had a thought. M@x should just spam each page with ads, then put a link to firefox's adblocker on the homepage. :P That might be less controversial. (among members anyway) :D
|
Posted By: ghost_of_morphy
Date Posted: June 18 2008 at 05:03
Ghost Rider wrote:
Ivan, I didn't mean to cause you any distress, or to undermine the work of your team.... I didn't even know who had added Contrarian, so my opinion is totally unbiased, and based exclusively on the music I heard - which didn't exactly set me on fire. However, I never said they shouldn't be featured, or anything like that, and I think my own posts were calm and respectful (unlike some others). |
Based upon the tracks available for streaming here, I certainly wouldn't question the addition of Contrarian. One of them put me in mind of a poor man's Symphony X, while the other was forgettable enough that I can't remember who it reminded me of. It was definitely a respectable prog act, though.
It is enough that these prog acts are willing to pay mailto:M@X - M@X for the exposure they get here. I certainly let myself be exposed. It may be too much to insist that they be great, or even good.
|
Posted By: debrewguy
Date Posted: June 18 2008 at 19:25
rileydog22 wrote:
schizoid_man77 wrote:
I'm all up for putting some attention on an artist, but I think we should aim for the ones with less of a 70's sound, and go for the ones who are a bit off the grind, and original, or at least portray some form of originality... |
Yeah, but most Avant bands are broke
|
And from the sound of some of them, their ear drums also.
------------- "Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
|