Print Page | Close Window

Goblin

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Report errors & omissions here
Forum Description: Seen a mistake in a band bio etc then please tell us
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=42533
Printed Date: November 30 2024 at 13:27
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Goblin
Posted By: anael
Subject: Goblin
Date Posted: October 12 2007 at 16:19
hi Indestructable team jajaja LOL

just two things:

1. track times for Buio Omega:
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=2669 - http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=2669

1. Buio Omega (main title) (2:56)
2. Quiet Drops (4:35)
3. Strive After Dark (2:33)
4. Pillage (2:22)
5. Rush (4:16)
6. Keen (4:06)
7. Ghost Vest (3:00)
8. Bikini Island (3:52)
9. Buio Omega (suite 1) (2:27)
10. Quiet Drops (film version) (2:19)
11. Strive After Dark (suite) (3:22)
12. Buio Omega (alternate version) (1:51)
13. Strive After Dark (alternate version) (3:12)
14. Buio Omega (synth effect - alternate takes suite) (3:10)
15. Buio Omega theme (reprise) (3:56)

i'm confused this album wasn't recorded in 1979? or the first release was until 1997?


2. the album by Il Reale Impero Britannico Perché Si Uccidono, i think it it gotta be remove to a new entry because it is a different band (same line-up yes) but under another name, that could be a problem ir it stays: then 500mg and Hash Jar Tempo gotta be removed to the Bardo Pond page, Cherry Five to Goblin too....or am i wrong?

that's all, thanks


-------------



Replies:
Posted By: Fassbinder
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 20:09
Meanwhile, the simplest thing (adding tracks lengths) is done...
 
...others should be still treated...
 
Thanks, Anael!


Posted By: Fassbinder
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 20:22
Instead of solving those other problems, I found some new ones... Embarrassed
 
There are three entries for Goblin's Greatest Hits, whereas two of them seem to be the same ( http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=2655 - http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=2655  and http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=459 - http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=459 ), and the third ( http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=2662 - http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=2662 ) seems to be a re-issue of the older version. All the three have the same cover, by the way...
 
So, the question is -- whether to merge these two version into one entry or not? (I think that deleting of one of the first two entries I mentioned is obvious).
 
To the attention of the united team.
 
Eugene.


Posted By: anael
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 21:07
Originally posted by Fassbinder Fassbinder wrote:

Meanwhile, the simplest thing (adding tracks lengths) is done...
 
...others should be still treated...
 
Thanks, Anael!


ok..no problem thanks Fassbinder


-------------


Posted By: Lady In Black
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 20:42
Originally posted by anael anael wrote:

hi Indestructable team jajaja LOL

just two things:

2. the album by Il Reale Impero Britannico Perché Si Uccidono, i think it it gotta be remove to a new entry because it is a different band (same line-up yes) but under another name, that could be a problem ir it stays: then 500mg and Hash Jar Tempo gotta be removed to the Bardo Pond page, Cherry Five to Goblin too....or am i wrong?

that's all, thanks
 
Not correctly. Apparentely you've reason but... The problem is in one contract (I think the contract of the film part because the label is Cinevox, the Goblin's label). So Goblin was compelled to use another name. So "Perché Si Uccidono" is to consider all of the effects a Goblin's album.
 
Cherry Five is a totally different band from Goblin. But was considered part of Goblin. If for Reale Impero Britannico is correct to speak of Goblin... Isn't correct for Cherry Five.


-------------
It's dark... I've fear... I have strong pains... A serpent is being born... That badly I did, I?


Posted By: Lady In Black
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 20:50
Originally posted by Fassbinder Fassbinder wrote:

Instead of solving those other problems, I found some new ones... Embarrassed
 
There are three entries for Goblin's Greatest Hits, whereas two of them seem to be the same ( http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=2655 - http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=2655  and http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=459 - http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=459 ), and the third ( http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=2662 - http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=2662 ) seems to be a re-issue of the older version. All the three have the same cover, by the way...
 
So, the question is -- whether to merge these two version into one entry or not? (I think that deleting of one of the first two entries I mentioned is obvious).
 
To the attention of the united team.
 
Eugene.
 
Well... Goblin's discography is strange. Also because the very O.S.T. are those of the remestered version by Cinevox/ Bixio C.E.M.S.A./ Pick Up Export (with not correctly extra material, because part of O.S.T. [and not all by Goblin]). Other are only a simple Goblin's albums. For the compilation... I think that the dicography is correct. But this cover imagine is abused only because is a Goblin's logo (in a certain sense). But if you have a doubt... Is better to contact Claudio Simonetti ( http://www.claudiosimonetti.com - www.claudiosimonetti.com ).


-------------
It's dark... I've fear... I have strong pains... A serpent is being born... That badly I did, I?



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk