Print Page | Close Window

Mudvayne

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics not related to music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=38391
Printed Date: February 06 2025 at 12:30
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Mudvayne
Posted By: Stratavarius
Subject: Mudvayne
Date Posted: May 28 2007 at 01:25
I think they should, tell me what you think!

-------------
So there you go.



Replies:
Posted By: NotSoKoolAid
Date Posted: May 28 2007 at 01:34
You're crazy! It's just metal.
 
Not to be insulting, but what makes you think Mudvayne is progressive in any sense of the word? Could you elaborate on why you think they should be here? I am curious.


Posted By: Stratavarius
Date Posted: May 28 2007 at 01:37
You can call radiohead indie...............

-------------
So there you go.


Posted By: Stratavarius
Date Posted: May 28 2007 at 01:39
i replied

-------------
So there you go.


Posted By: Atomic_Rooster
Date Posted: May 28 2007 at 01:42
Originally posted by Stratavarius Stratavarius wrote:

i replied


*applauds politely*


-------------
I am but a servant of the mighty Fripp, the sound of whose loins shall forever be upon the tongues of his followers.


Posted By: Stratavarius
Date Posted: May 28 2007 at 01:45
=) I just love internet sarcasm.

-------------
So there you go.


Posted By: oracus
Date Posted: May 28 2007 at 07:30
Definately no! Not even close to progressive IMO

-------------



Posted By: Spacemac
Date Posted: May 28 2007 at 09:55
No


Posted By: Aspiring hope
Date Posted: May 28 2007 at 10:14
Perhaps you'd have a better chance in suggesting something more underground or more inconspicuous to the mainstream scope, instead of picking bands that have already established themselves in the "not necessarily progressive" industry. Even if it were to be rejected, at least it'd come to a more interesting discussion in the process, whereas, given Mudvayne's popular status, the answer's really that obvious; people here like surprises...maybe. Just a thought.

-------------

This is why you should let Robin save the day...


Posted By: Matt Dickens
Date Posted: May 28 2007 at 11:17
How about Linkin Park?
 
Or Oasis?
 
those choices seem just as logical.


-------------
If it ain't broke don't break it.


Posted By: debrewguy
Date Posted: May 28 2007 at 12:43
Originally posted by Aspiring hope Aspiring hope wrote:

Perhaps you'd have a better chance in suggesting something more underground or more inconspicuous to the mainstream scope, instead of picking bands that have already established themselves in the "not necessarily progressive" industry. Even if it were to be rejected, at least it'd come to a more interesting discussion in the process, whereas, given Mudvayne's popular status, the answer's really that obvious; people here like surprises...maybe. Just a thought.

Mudvayne's popular ? Confused I believe that the metal monster make-up bands (Slipknot, Mudvayne,Mushroomhead) have seen their best days, music & popularity wise. They may have their "cult" following, but I predict that most of them will be working day jobs soon. THough I think the guy in Stone Sour might have a longer career.


-------------
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.


Posted By: Aspiring hope
Date Posted: May 28 2007 at 13:49
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


Originally posted by Aspiring hope Aspiring hope wrote:

Perhaps you'd have a better chance in suggesting something more underground or more inconspicuous to the mainstream scope, instead of picking bands that have already established themselves in the "not necessarily progressive" industry. Even if it were to be rejected, at least it'd come to a more interesting discussion in the process, whereas, given Mudvayne's popular status, the answer's really that obvious; people here like surprises...maybe. Just a thought.
Mudvayne's popular ? Confused I believe that the metal monster make-up bands (Slipknot, Mudvayne,Mushroomhead) have seen their best days, music & popularity wise. They may have their "cult" following, but I predict that most of them will be working day jobs soon. THough I think the guy in Stone Sour might have a longer career.

Yeah, you're right and I was kind of reluctant to use that term, since you won't be seeing them (or hearing about them) in the top of today's charts, I think, but, like you said, there is - or at least was - somewhat of a "cult" following. But the point I was trying to make was that we all (or almost) know who Mudvayne are (and a good lot don't care too much for them, either, me thinks), even if they're the old news, now, so it's less likely that we'll be having a bigger discussion there...that and the fact that they're clearly not progressive.

-------------

This is why you should let Robin save the day...


Posted By: Hallogallo
Date Posted: May 29 2007 at 02:28
You might as well add Milli Vanilli and Lionel Richie to the archives.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Drekavac/?chartstyle=iTunesFIXED">


Posted By: markosherrera
Date Posted: May 29 2007 at 22:36
Mudvayne isnt prog,they are nu metal with other influences


Posted By: SolariS
Date Posted: May 29 2007 at 22:41


i'm going to start a nickleback thread like this one.






-------------


Posted By: Proletariat
Date Posted: May 29 2007 at 22:41
I see where he is coming from. Mudvayne has been known to use some complex time signatures and even called their style math-metal at some point.
NO they are NOT prog, they never pushed musical bounds or created anything new never came close to classical music or wrote long compositions or electric instuirmentation, or consept album NO NO NO!

-------------
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob


Posted By: Sckxyss
Date Posted: May 30 2007 at 00:44
Originally posted by Proletariat Proletariat wrote:

I see where he is coming from. Mudvayne has been known to use some complex time signatures and even called their style math-metal at some point.
 
Then it's decided, these guys are prog. Thanks for pointing this out.


Posted By: GoldenSpiral
Date Posted: May 30 2007 at 00:53
I don't think they're prog metal, but before you dismiss, just forget about the radio singles and listen to the LD 50 album.  It's very good, at least in the rhythm section.  The bassist is phenomenal and they have some great experimental electronic interludes.

If you've never heard "Death Blooms", it's a really good track.  They were much better with the makeup Wink

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FeIu_pf-_E - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FeIu_pf-_E


-------------
http://www.myspace.com/altaic" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/altaic
ALTAIC

"Oceans Down You'll Lie"
coming soon


Posted By: Proletariat
Date Posted: May 30 2007 at 00:55
Originally posted by Sckxyss Sckxyss wrote:

Originally posted by Proletariat Proletariat wrote:

I see where he is coming from. Mudvayne has been known to use some complex time signatures and even called their style math-metal at some point.
 
Then it's decided, these guys are prog. Thanks for pointing this out.
WAIT! WHAT?
 
your joking right, you gotta read the rest. I mean they are as good of a choice to add as metallica (who should not be added) for christ sakes. But they still should not be added


-------------
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob


Posted By: Matt Dickens
Date Posted: May 30 2007 at 01:12
Soundgarden used all kinds of odd times.
 
is that prog?
 
no.
 
Neither is Mudvayne.
 
Nickelback would get my vote though.
 
seriously.
 
Leave it to us humans to try to reach such ridiculous conclusions.


-------------
If it ain't broke don't break it.


Posted By: Sckxyss
Date Posted: May 30 2007 at 01:14
I don't read anything past the first line of any post, clearly.
 
Also, please, never do anything as silly as comparing mudvayne to metallica. I don't really care if they're added or not, but they've done a heck of a lot for music than quite a few bands on the archives currently.


Posted By: JayDee
Date Posted: May 30 2007 at 01:23
Originally posted by GoldenSpiral GoldenSpiral wrote:

I don't think they're prog metal, but before you dismiss, just forget about the radio singles and listen to the LD 50 album.  It's very good, at least in the rhythm section.  The bassist is phenomenal and they have some great experimental electronic interludes.

If you've never heard "Death Blooms", it's a really good track.  They were much better with the makeup Wink

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FeIu_pf-_E - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FeIu_pf-_E
LD 50 is their best and Death Blooms kicks arse.
Mudvayne progressive metal???? No, not a chance.


-------------



Posted By: millsy2000
Date Posted: June 01 2007 at 09:17
lol mudvaune sound nothing like prog 

-------------


Posted By: Nipsey88
Date Posted: June 01 2007 at 10:58
Had they actually grown as a band from the encouraging and borderline prog L.D. 50, I'd have voted yes.

Sadly, they did not. The next 2 found them wallowing in cliche and banality, very disappointing after the promise of the debut. The bassist is still silly good, though.


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Nipsey88/?chartstyle=myspace02" rel="nofollow">



Posted By: Ryth
Date Posted: June 02 2007 at 16:50
Hell no.

-------------
http://rateyourmusic.com/~Ryth">


Posted By: Sckxyss
Date Posted: June 02 2007 at 22:45
Why are people taking this poll seriously? Unhappy


Posted By: Philéas
Date Posted: June 04 2007 at 11:21
Wrong section.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk