Print Page | Close Window

Home Recording Enthusiasts

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: Tech Talk
Forum Description: Discuss musical instruments, equipment, hi-fi, speakers, vinyl, gadgets,etc.
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3622
Printed Date: November 28 2024 at 03:51
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Home Recording Enthusiasts
Posted By: Guests
Subject: Home Recording Enthusiasts
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 01:05

Need advice for setting up a low-budget, "bare-bones" home recording studio:
(Maybe this topic has already been dealt with)
But, if you already have one in operation, then...

1) What kind of setup do you have as far as equipment (multi-track units, mixers, microphones, and so forth) ?


2) Assuming you edit recordings via computer, what software do you use / prefer ?

3) Any good internet links, tips, or relevant (and cost saving) suggestions ?

Thank You for your time 





Replies:
Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 04:20

How low is your budget?

A decent PC is the best first step, with a good soundcard and plenty of memory. Creative gets plenty of justified abuse, but they make a good workhorse card for not much money and almost any PC you buy will probably have one in it already, and hopefully even one with a digital I/O. I use an Echo Gina card for music, in addition to my Audigy for everything else, and they seem pretty happy together. If you're at all handy, you can build a killer PC for half of what it would cost pre-assembled.

Depending on what you want to want to do, Cubase and Sonar are my picks for audio/ MIDI work (and I think they even have low-budget versions without the extras). But if you're heavy on audio and don't need much MIDI, Sonic Foundry's Acid is an unbeatable program.

What are your recording needs? If you don't have a lot of different things to record at the same time, forget about mixers and multi-tracks- you'll be doing most of that on the PC anyway. All you really need is a good mic (or two) and a decent mic preamp. I have a Behringer tube preamp, and it was really cheap even brand new. A dynamic microphone like the standard Shure SM58 type will be okay for a lot of things, but if you're serious about sound quality you're gonna need a condenser. Rode makes great ones for not a lot of cash.

eBay all the way. Most of my hardware passes through eBay on the way in (and out). I'm also a big fan of pawn shops and garage sales- I'm still hoping to find a Moog or Oberheim for fifty bucks someday.

 

 



-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/sollipsist/?chartstyle=kaonashi">


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: February 12 2005 at 11:09
This helps...
Thanks James.

This confirms my notion that Echo makes good equipment. 

Are multi-track units (digital or analog) dinosaurs ?  I mean, are computers / software totally replacing them ?

Do you do any direct in-line recording, as opposed to using microphones in an acoustically-friendly room ?

I won't be doing any MIDI at all at this point.


thanks again for your time


Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: February 13 2005 at 00:28

Multi-tracks are still a fine choice, and nothing beats the sound of good-quality analog tape IMHO. I'm just too cheap and lazy to work with them...plus there's the convenience of a software front-end that is easily expandable. And just try to play "Half Life 2" on an ADAT machine...

I do most of my guitar and bass direct, usually through a POD but sometimes through the mic preamp. Plus I have a couple of synths and effects units, so I guess it's about half direct and half microphone. Most of my synths and samples are on the PC already, so in a given song I'll usually only really 'record' three or four tracks.

If you're not getting into MIDI, I highly recommend a decent PC and a copy of ACID (or ACID Express, even cheaper). That will pretty much take care of most of your recording needs.



-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/sollipsist/?chartstyle=kaonashi">


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 13 2005 at 15:48

PC + Echo Gina + ACID + POD + a DECENT Mic is all you need, although MAC + Pro Tools is the ideal

The best thing about using a POD is that you don't have to do so much processing in software - the CPU can get quite tied up once you multi-effect a few multi-tracked guitars.

ACID handles SMP pretty well, so if you can afford a dual-processor machine, go for it. At the very least, an Intel (or better, AMD, if they make an HT unit) Hyperthreading CPU will do a reasonable job of simulating a duallie and spread the load.

We tend to use ACID far more than Sonar, and I gave up on Cubase years ago as being too fiddly by half - but maybe it's improved since then (1994 was the last time I played with it!). There's not much you can't do in the latest incarnation of ACID - although waiting for the next service pack so that it all works is a pain... ACID 4 + service packs works a treat though - although 5 has some desirable features (that don't all work...).

 



Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: February 13 2005 at 15:55

I've never had much luck with AMD- they perform great but tend to run way too hot. Add that to the high-end graphics cards I use, plus the general climate here in the desert...I've had PCs burn out more than once. So make sure if you go AMD you have something more than a case fan or two to keep everything cool.



-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/sollipsist/?chartstyle=kaonashi">


Posted By: arcer
Date Posted: February 13 2005 at 17:33

top advice from the boys - can't really add any more

Behringer do a really small pre-amp for a few bucks (I know it's GB£29) that works really well. I have a Joe Meek 'Meekraphone' which is really sweet and not expensive. Rode do some good ones too.

For prog - invest in Native Instruments' Elektrik Piano (Rhodes Wulry, Clavi), B4 (hammond), GMedia's M-Tron (mellotron) and any good soft synth (I'd recommend GMedia's ImpOscar (cheap and very very powerful)

 



Posted By: Sweetnighter
Date Posted: February 13 2005 at 20:35
Being a newbie to home recording, I'll tell you a little of what I've done... I have a feeling that some of the other board members here have a little more experience than I though.

I have an E-mu 0404 soundcard that I picked up for $100 and it works pretty well. It came with decent Cubasis VST recording software which I find pretty effective. If you're on a tight budget, as I was when I went out and bought my first pieces of hardware, then that might be a good solution for you, as the recording software will already be compatible with the soundcard and will ultimately save you money. Get a good pair of studio monitors! Trying to hear your music from normal computer speakers will frustrate you and result in poor EQ on your final recordings. Although most good active monitor speakers won't be found for less than $200, its well worth the investment.

If you ever get into MIDI in the future, you'll find it as an invaluable tool, especially if you have a poor sense of rhythm . The keyboard I got, a Korg MS2000b, is a great choice if you're playing prog and want to use MIDI. The keyboard is MIDI compatible, simulates the vintage Korg MS series sounds, and is a decent price for a new synth. I would definitely suggest it .

www.homerecording.com/bbs

/\           /\              /\
 |            |               |
 |            |               |
 |            |               |

Very helpful page. Many knowledgable people who can help you and give you good deals on sound equip as well.

I also picked up "Home Recording for Musicians for Dummies" at borders a while back too. Very helpful.

Hope these suggestions have helped you, and good luck!

Oh yeah, btw, you can check out some of the music I've recorded here:
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/8/iangutierrez.htm


-------------
I bleed coffee. When I don't drink coffee, my veins run dry, and I shrivel up and die.
"Banco Del Mutuo Soccorso? Is that like the bank of Italian soccer death or something?" -my girlfriend


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: February 14 2005 at 00:25
Thanks very much to all of you...
This helps...

Internet search results indicate that Sonic Foundry is Sony, or vise versa ? Or neither ?


Question (has nothing to do with my initial query): From a philosophical angle, are all these fancy high-tech thingys turning us into "technicians" rather than pure musicians ?
I mean...Can a musically "challenged" person produce a stunning piece of music without hardly trying ?




Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: February 14 2005 at 03:52

I don't know about 'hardly trying', but you can definitely make something original and expressive without knowing musical theory or how to play an instrument.

A lot of traditionalists may scoff, but making music is basically just putting sounds together...Mozart would have still been Mozart if he'd worked with a sampler and a drum machine, and I'd still just be a happy dilettante if I had an orchestra at my disposal . The technology provides tools (and often suggests a form), but it's still up to your creativity and proficiency at using these tools.

I guess that there's an inherent beauty in a musical instrument that I don't usually see in a piece of technology (though programmers and engineers may). Still, mastering the skills needed to make really good music with technology can be every bit as demanding and ultimately self-expressive as dedicating your life to an instrument.

And a hack with a PC has just as much chance of getting success as a hack with an electric guitar...but it might not impress chicks as much in the meantime. 



-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/sollipsist/?chartstyle=kaonashi">


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: February 14 2005 at 11:26
Good perspective James, thanks.

Now this software ACID that several of you guys mentioned, is it the same thing as made by Sony ?
My internet search results came up with some puzzling info...


Thanks for your time


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: February 14 2005 at 21:00
Originally posted by arcer arcer wrote:

top advice from the boys - can't really add any more

Behringer do a really small pre-amp for a few bucks (I know it's GB£29) that works really well. I have a Joe Meek 'Meekraphone' which is really sweet and not expensive. Rode do some good ones too.

For prog - invest in Native Instruments' Elektrik Piano (Rhodes Wulry, Clavi), B4 (hammond), GMedia's M-Tron (mellotron) and any good soft synth (I'd recommend GMedia's ImpOscar (cheap and very very powerful)


OK, Question: How do these software synths work ?  Just move the mouse pointer over the virtual keyboard on screen, or would I have to actually buy a keyboard and wire it to the PC ?

Also, GMedia's M-Tron is just a software plug-in, right ?  What I mean is, I would have to purchase additional software to run the M-Tron stuff...Yes...No ???




Posted By: Sweetnighter
Date Posted: February 14 2005 at 22:37
Originally posted by utah_man utah_man wrote:

Originally posted by arcer arcer wrote:

top advice from the boys - can't really add any more

Behringer do a really small pre-amp for a few bucks (I know it's GB£29) that works really well. I have a Joe Meek 'Meekraphone' which is really sweet and not expensive. Rode do some good ones too.

For prog - invest in Native Instruments' Elektrik Piano (Rhodes Wulry, Clavi), B4 (hammond), GMedia's M-Tron (mellotron) and any good soft synth (I'd recommend GMedia's ImpOscar (cheap and very very powerful)


OK, Question: How do these software synths work ?  Just move the mouse pointer over the virtual keyboard on screen, or would I have to actually buy a keyboard and wire it to the PC ?

Also, GMedia's M-Tron is just a software plug-in, right ?  What I mean is, I would have to purchase additional software to run the M-Tron stuff...Yes...No ???




Great question! I've always wondered this myself too.

I've heard tons about Propellerhead's program Reason... supposedly has some great soft synth sounds on it.


-------------
I bleed coffee. When I don't drink coffee, my veins run dry, and I shrivel up and die.
"Banco Del Mutuo Soccorso? Is that like the bank of Italian soccer death or something?" -my girlfriend


Posted By: sigod
Date Posted: February 15 2005 at 05:07
There are two golden rules that I always use when recording and both are dull, non-sexy things that can work wonders for the quality of your work.

1. Take a lot of time getting a good sound at source before you record. It saves you so much time later when it come to mixing/mastering.
2. Roll some bass off EVERYTHING except bass guitar, kick drums and some keyboard low stuff. Again, it helps with sound separation at the mixing stage.

The three most important FX you can have (ie. the thing you really want to spend the money on) are EQ, Compresson and Reverb. Everything else is window dressing IMO.




-------------
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: February 15 2005 at 11:10
Originally posted by sigod sigod wrote:

There are two golden rules that I always use when recording and both are dull, non-sexy things that can work wonders for the quality of your work.

1. Take a lot of time getting a good sound at source before you record. It saves you so much time later when it come to mixing/mastering.
2. Roll some bass off EVERYTHING except bass guitar, kick drums and some keyboard low stuff. Again, it helps with sound separation at the mixing stage.

The three most important FX you can have (ie. the thing you really want to spend the money on) are EQ, Compresson and Reverb. Everything else is window dressing IMO.



Good advice, thanks very much


Posted By: The Owl
Date Posted: February 15 2005 at 11:13

Originally posted by utah_man utah_man wrote:


Need advice for setting up a low-budget, "bare-bones" home recording studio:
(Maybe this topic has already been dealt with)
But, if you already have one in operation, then...

1)
What kind of setup do you have as far as equipment (multi-track units, mixers, microphones, and so forth) ?

2) Assuming you edit recordings via computer, what software do you use / prefer ?

3) Any good internet links, tips, or relevant (and cost saving) suggestions ?

Thank You for your time 

 

For entry-level with a lot of features:

Stand-Alone Recorder - The new TASCAM 8-track DAW's are great values for the money, and can be interfaced with a computer

http://www.tascam.com/Products/dp01fx.html - http://www.tascam.com/Products/dp01fx.html

http://www.tascam.com/Products/dp01.html - http://www.tascam.com/Products/dp01.html

Software: CUBASE SE is a great package, $99 (US) and it gives you TONS Of features (48-tracks of audio, unlimited midi, good editing and plug-in support etc)

http://www.steinberg.net/ProductPage_sb.asp?Product_ID=2141&Langue_ID=7 - http://www.steinberg.net/ProductPage_sb.asp?Product_ID=2141& amp;Langue_ID=7

Hope that helps



-------------
People are puzzled why I don't dig the Stones, well, I listened to the Stones, I tried, and I tried, and I tried, and--I Can't Get No Satisfaction!

www.myspace.com/theowlsmusic


Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: February 15 2005 at 15:33
Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

I've never had much luck with AMD- they perform great but tend to run way too hot. Add that to the high-end graphics cards I use, plus the general climate here in the desert...I've had PCs burn out more than once. So make sure if you go AMD you have something more than a case fan or two to keep everything cool.

That certainly used to be the case, but they're pretty much the same as Intel these days. I stopped building machines with Intel Inside a couple of years ago, as AMD are 1) MUCH cheaper and 2) just as powerful - more bang for the buck.

As a PC building enthusiast, I tend to plan my rigs from the case upwards, so tend to start with a case designed for good airflow - preferably aluminium - with plenty of fan bays.

Two are required; One in front, orientated such that it takes air into the case. The other is needed at the rear, as an exhaust - in addition to the one that comes with the PSU. It's not too hard to track down quiet fans, and fan controller units that fit into a drive bay are a handy way of monitoring heat and adjusting the fans if less noise or more cooling is required. Silent PSUs are a good investment, and it's better to get a decent heatsink/fan unit than use the one that ships with CPUs. Heat also builds up around the disk drives, so round cables (for good case airflow) and a disk cooling fan are useful additions, but refer to my note at the end of the next paragraph.

Your music studio PC won't need a stonking graphics card, so a low-end GF4 is not only cheap, but doesn't need another fan on it to create more noise; Graphics card fans are not as straightforward to find replacements for, and you really want as little noise in the case as possible, as it finds its way into your recordings.

The ultimate cooling system is a water-cooler, which is silent. They're fairly expensive, and you'll still have noise from your HDD and PSU - but that's all. The case can be lined with fairly inexpensive sound-absorbing material for the final touches.

The sound card/unit should be external, or have a "break-out" box to really minimise noise.

Originally posted by utah_man utah_man wrote:

Now this software ACID that several of you guys mentioned, is it the same thing as made by Sony ?
My internet search results came up with some puzzling info...

Yes



Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: February 15 2005 at 20:00

virtual instruments are triggered via MIDI; you can plug a keyboard into the PC (most use a MIDI connection but some have USB also) and play them that way, but I often simply place the notes where I need them in the instrument's 'track window' and keep editing until they sound right. In any case, you don't necessarily need a keyboard to use them, but it's a good thing to have if you like experimenting with sounds over your other tracks.

There's an issue called 'latency' which may come up depending on the software you use. Basically, latency is the gap between when you press a key on your keyboard and when the sound actually starts. The lower latency the better, and it depends on things like how good your soundcard is and how powerful your PC is. When the first VSTs came out, I couldn't play them in real time at all (ever try to play an instrument that was a half a second late all the time?) but technology has helped the situation...though Sonar still responds more quickly than Cubase in my set-up.

virtual effects don't require any controller, but you can get them to do fun things by recording and editing changes in their parameters...



-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/sollipsist/?chartstyle=kaonashi">


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: February 15 2005 at 21:43
Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

virtual instruments are triggered via MIDI; you can plug a keyboard into the PC (most use a MIDI connection but some have USB also) and play them that way, but I often simply place the notes where I need them in the instrument's 'track window' and keep editing until they sound right. In any case, you don't necessarily need a keyboard to use them, but it's a good thing to have if you like experimenting with sounds over your other tracks.

There's an issue called 'latency' which may come up depending on the software you use. Basically, latency is the gap between when you press a key on your keyboard and when the sound actually starts. The lower latency the better, and it depends on things like how good your soundcard is and how powerful your PC is. When the first VSTs came out, I couldn't play them in real time at all (ever try to play an instrument that was a half a second late all the time?) but technology has helped the situation...though Sonar still responds more quickly than Cubase in my set-up.

virtual effects don't require any controller, but you can get them to do fun things by recording and editing changes in their parameters...



Ok, I understand what you mean with regard to these issues.  And now that you mention it, it does make sense - "latency" I mean.

For now I'm going to have to just try to "tweak" the sound files I've got on my PC (Mellotron, Hammond B3, Moog samples, etc. ) - The software I'm currently using has the ability to take any given sound note and change / save it as any other given sound note.  Example: I've taken a middle C (Mellotron) and completely converted it to a G, an E, F, etc. etc. (along with the corresponding sharps and flats).  The neat thing is, I have been able to do this and not lose any resolution in this "conversion".  It's not all that time consuming either.

The downside: I have to be real clever as to how I can actually "play" a melody line with all these Mellotron notes inside the computer and transfer that to a multi-track.  But I'm slowly perfecting my system...

The upside is: It's Economical, and very challenging.

Thanks again for your time James




Posted By: sigod
Date Posted: February 16 2005 at 05:14
Originally posted by utah_man utah_man wrote:

[QUOTE=sigod]

Good advice, thanks very much


Your welcome mate.


-------------
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill


Posted By: BenRush
Date Posted: February 16 2005 at 12:15

I just bought Stylus by spectrasonics for my studio, awsome vsti with 7.5 gigs of drum loops and sounds.

 

My home studio comprises PC with 3GHz cpu 2 Gb ram SATA 200Gb drive running Cubase SX and loads of VSTi synths inc Reason 2.5. There is so much good stuff out there now.



-------------
http://www.plastictoys.co.uk">


Posted By: sigod
Date Posted: February 17 2005 at 05:15
Originally posted by BenRush BenRush wrote:

I just bought Stylus by spectrasonics for my studio, awsome vsti with 7.5 gigs of drum loops and sounds.



Cool! How does it sound?


-------------
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill


Posted By: BenRush
Date Posted: February 17 2005 at 05:22
The first version was a little too much about break beat styles. The second one has a huge sound bank so has a wider range. Very easy to use and uses so little CPU power.

-------------
http://www.plastictoys.co.uk">


Posted By: sigod
Date Posted: February 17 2005 at 06:11
Originally posted by BenRush BenRush wrote:

The first version was a little too much about break beat styles. The second one has a huge sound bank so has a wider range. Very easy to use and uses so little CPU power.


This is good news. As a prog musician, nothing is more annoying than getting a new bit of hardwear or software only to find that it forces you to make 'dance' music.


-------------
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: June 03 2005 at 00:44
Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

There's an issue called 'latency' which may come up depending on the software you use. Basically, latency is the gap between when you press a key on your keyboard and when the sound actually starts. The lower latency the better, and it depends on things like how good your soundcard is and how powerful your PC is.



[to re-open an old thread...]

to: JL or anybody ...
with my current setup i'm not experiencing any latency at all.

...however, if i attach a keyboard to the pc (via midi), will that increase the chances of latency occuring ?

as always, grazie per il vostro tempo 










Posted By: goose
Date Posted: June 03 2005 at 05:15
If you're using a softsynth, yes. If you're using straight MIDI sounds off the soundcard, there won't be any noticeable latency in any situation.


Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: June 03 2005 at 06:58








Posted By: DarHobo
Date Posted: July 08 2005 at 00:06
Anyone use a mac and/ or garageband for recording?



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk