Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General discussions
Forum Description: Discuss any topic at all that is not music-related
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2931 Printed Date: November 27 2024 at 13:40 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Does prog make you smart?Posted By: gdub411
Subject: Does prog make you smart?
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 13:44
Recently my uncle had told me of an experiment someone made. They took two normal people who listened to standard pop music and gave them a variety of acedemic tests to guage their I.Q and their level of knowledge.
After that they had one person listen to rap for an entire month while the other listened to classical music.
Afterwards they retested them and found the one who listened to rap actually scored lower than he did a month earlier and the one who listened to classical scored higher.
1st I was wondering if anyone has heard of this or is this just a bunch of mularkey?
2nd, if it is true, could the same hold true for someone who listens to progressive rock, would they actually get smarter like the guy who listened to classical.(that obviously hasn't been the case for me.)
Replies: Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 13:50
Nope, I believe you have to be already stupid to listen rap
(Just a joke)
Ivn
Posted By: Syzygy
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 13:53
The classical music phenomenon has been (controversially) documented before - I think there was a study called The Mozart Effect (or something along those lines). I've not heard about any specific study relating to rap, but I'd imagine similar effects would be associated with styles like death metal, hardore punk and anything my neighbour's teenagers play at 2 am when their parents are away.
I also recall a study which showed that plants grow better if you play them classical music, but worse if you play them hard rock. I always leave my radio tuned to radio 3 if we're away for a few days and my plants seem to thrive on it. This would bear out Lemmy's boast about Motorhead: "If we moved in next door to you, your lawn would die".
Having said that, IQ tests prove nothing more than your ability to do well in IQ tests. Anybody who wants to join MENSA should be forced to read a copy of 'The Mismeasure of Man' by Stephen Jay Gould first.
------------- 'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute
to the already rich among us...'
Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 13:55
"If we moved in next door to you, your lawn would die".
Must be the wart
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 13:58
gdub411 wrote:
1st I was wondering if anyone has heard of this or is this just a bunch of mularkey?
It beggars belief!
I reckon if you try hard enough, you can prove anything you want in a lab situation!
Total cobblers!
-------------
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:00
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:01
Well lets face it, the Rap Stars aint no Rocket Scientists
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: cirith
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:04
well its probably because the music is more complex, if you listen(not hear)mozart and then britney spears i dont think u would learn much from britney, but maybe thats just a load of crap since music can react in different ways for each people.
------------- yeah i have a funky fish!
Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:09
Recently I told this girl who happens to be an avid rap listener this experiment and she said "It was a bunch of crap!
I told her a classical music listener would have said it more articulately like: That is a great deal of defacation or such
Later she had forgotten where she had left her purse and asked if I knew where it was and I told her " If you'd listen to classical music you'd remember."
Her reply to that was "#@%#%^"......
Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:10
I remember a laboratory test involving laboratory-rats.
When a group of scientists studied these rats and one of them began to laugh on what the Rats were doing the other scientist began to laugh too, for they wouldn't want to be the one left holding the joke.
Anyway scientific tests can prove anything you want them to prove.
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:11
Oh Rats !!
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:14
Anyone on this Forum who thinks all Rap music is unintelligent is ignorant.
IMHO.
See one of them is a Doctor for Christssake!
-------------
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:16
Sorry !!!!!!! Witch Doctor might that be ?????
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Matt0001
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:43
Your uncle told you of an experiment that was made, huh? Any idea where
this study was done, where the results were published? Sorry, my urban
legend detector is going bonkers here.
Rap does not make you stupid. Believe it or not, there is good hip hop
out there. As with any style of music, the best is not necessarily
represented on the radio. And even one of the most popular albums of
the past couple years--Outkast's Speakerboxx/The Love Below-- is also
one of the best albums regardless of genre from the past ten years.
Andre 3000 is the Frank Zappa of hip hop. Don't tune out anything from
ignorance. Give it an honest listen first.
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:44
Frank Zappa of hip hop.
That will make him turn in his grave !!!!!!
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:47
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:50
ZAPPA WOULD TURN IN HIS GRAVE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:57
Zappa was a square just like you old guyz
see how you are like old grandads, oh music of today it all noise. Not Kool you guyz.
Tails Of Topografic ocean that is one kool album .
dre & eminem rock, the kidz luv them
pioe and sliper bregade here again.
Posted By: goose
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:57
How do you know, without listening? Does having rapping on a song
automatically remove any other good aspects the song could have?
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 14:59
Shocktaktix wrote:
Zappa was a square just like you old guyz
see how you are like old grandads, oh music of today it all noise. Not Kool you guyz.
Tails Of Topografic ocean that is one kool album .
dre & eminem rock, the kidz luv them
pioe and sliper bregade here again.
I guess that settles it conclusively.................
-------------
Posted By: Bryan
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 15:05
Am I the only one being bothered by the fact that you guys are looking down on people who listen to music you don't like?
I listen to some rap, as well as punk, death metal, and other genres you guys are citing as making people stupid, and I would like to think of myself as maybe being remotely intelligent (although I'm more than open to having my thoughts changed on this matter).
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 15:06
Useful_Idiot wrote:
Am I the only one being bothered by the fact that you guys are looking down on people who listen to music you don't like?
I listen to some rap, as well as punk, death metal, and other genres you guys are citing as making people stupid, and I would like to think of myself as maybe being remotely intelligent (although I'm more than open to having my thoughts changed on this matter).
I never bite the hand that feeds me.......
-------------
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 16:59
Useful_Idiot wrote:
Am I the only one being bothered by the fact that you guys are looking down on people who listen to music you don't like?
I listen to some rap, as well as punk, death metal, and other genres you guys are citing as making people stupid, and I would like to think of myself as maybe being remotely intelligent (although I'm more than open to having my thoughts changed on this matter).
Like you, I listen only to music I like, without discrimitating because of genre.
All genres have a portion of great music, a portion of utter tosh, and a middle ground (Duh!).
It's up to a selective listener to find the music he/she likes and ignore anyone who doesn't agree - why follow the herd?
Posted By: Garion81
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 17:24
gdub411 wrote:
Recently I told this girl who happens to be an avid rap listener this experiment and she said "It was a bunch of crap!
I told her a classical music listener would have said it more articulately like: That is a great deal of defacation or such
Later she had forgotten where she had left her purse and asked if I knew where it was and I told her " If you'd listen to classical music you'd remember."
Her reply to that was "#@%#%^"......
Winning friends and influencing people again, Gdub?
-------------
"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 17:35
Garion81 wrote:
gdub411 wrote:
Recently I told this girl who happens to be an avid rap listener this experiment and she said "It was a bunch of crap!
I told her a classical music listener would have said it more articulately like: That is a great deal of defacation or such
Later she had forgotten where she had left her purse and asked if I knew where it was and I told her " If you'd listen to classical music you'd remember."
Her reply to that was "#@%#%^"......
Winning friends and influencing people again, Gdub?
That's just my seductive charm. Actually we have been friends for well over 10 years so I know she's cool with it. She just has bad taste in music.
Posted By: asuma
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 18:11
ive heard some smart rap.
Dr. Octagon
here is one song
Dr. Octagon Biology 101 lyrics
Yeah
At 40,000 kelvin, it's Dr. Octagon,
with the Emperor General
drop down to 40 g's
can science achieve the unified theory of complex
systems
permenantly skeptical of friends of the institute
external faculty, a routine exerts selected pressure by
killing less-fit programs
life evolves, in cyber space
green and blue objects of self-replicating lightning
represents
random mutation complete with chaotic systems
such as turbular fluids
heated gasses are formless
fully complex, amino entree disappear the order in
which you
ordered the poetry the torsist liquid terms compiled
among a list of
31 ways to define
grammatical the degree of universiality in a
language required to
describe a style
effective the degree of regular rather than random
information
for instance complexity equals the capacity of an un
expecting
observer
thermo dynamic deaf of the amount of resource to
put back a system
together from scratch
pioneering, engineering, cybernetic, cellular,
calculus
co-operating flatly contradicting predictable
circumstances including
uranium 235 is obtained from bombs fission
can science achieve a unified theory of complex
systems?
maybe so
can science achieve a unified theory of complex
systems?
maybe so
can science achieve a unified theory of complex
systems?
maybe so
can science achieve a unified theory of complex
systems?
like carbon dioxide you messing with the chemicals,
warfare different stars
in the atmospheres like haley's comet computers
that will make you vomit
change the earth south saliva run in your mouth
gastric juice more beyond
since mother goose created shapes the first man
was hairy apes
7, 35 PPTD
over powering spray crops like DDT
the first around apollo 13 beaming down through
rain drops white pieces hit
the scene
atomic formats complex playin on silver DATs
guarded by sonic steel and taken off by thundercats
you on the avenue wishin you could see me my force
field shuts in two eyes
seein three of me
illusions fusions particle gas confusions i run space
shuttles in EM you
the solution
takin off from boe meet me at the black hole in times
four your mind seems
to move in tider showin you the spectrums
the past in fabric liner you in my future now
is h2o a gas or a liquid?
perhaps concepts could not explain
is h2o a gas or a liquid?
perhaps concepts could not explain
is h2o a gas or a liquid?
perhaps concepts could not explain
is h2o a gas or a liquid?
psychology is not applied biology nor is biology
applied chemistry
level independant some degrade the levels above
and below captive
intricancies after their friends give interest
theories collapse, perhaps concepts cannot explain
irreversible concrete
philosophical developments
such analysis indicate
emergence naturally, in a simple society
the pale matrix summerizes the scorming affluent
software 30 arc seconds
strategy like drops of water floating in a void unstable
atoms orbit this
new cloud nuclear having excess neutrinos or
protons teeter on the edges of
nuclear stability nor and drip lines under the stress
some develop a halo
bale radioactivity isotopes exotic
depending on their velocity their charges narrow
momentum distribution
force is directly reflected
electric magnetic c 22 l i 11 escape particle
bombardment
properties of the nucleus
v8 in the sun it produces easily detected
neutrinos much less to predict the standards can be
designed if you end it
and it provide for continuing evolution of technology
by remaining
compatible with existing applications in
programming language
psychology is not applied biology nor is biology
applied chemistry
whats the issue?
psychology is not applied biology nor is biology
applied chemistry
whats the issue?
psychology is not applied biology nor is biology
applied chemistry
whats the issue?
psychology is not applied biology nor is biology
applied chemistry
whats the issue?
psychology is not applied biology nor is biology
applied chemistry
whats the issue?
delta 9 approximate time my face in venus the sun is
over there and nothing
gets between us
you the earthling trying to float its a mental thing i got
oxygen 8 hours
of space time you must return quick
please don't waste time
you get down here, the moon is a place to fear with 2
minutes on the planet
you're only bound to panic we have no extras, bags,
etcetera
what if your obstacles backfires you inflate in
seconds nervous like flat
tires one seconds left to orbit has last breath
telecast to earth a astronaut didn't make it we move
beyond
your navigation enable a 32 switching like channel
13
late at night you see a blank screen focus on the
outer limits but you're
back on stage
on the line of scrimmage i am out here come and
get me with no equipment
call the president not even rocks or fossils live
damaged by the elements
is light the source?
touch my delicate instrument
is light the source?
touch my delicate instrument
is light the source?
touch my delicate instrument
is light the source?
touch my delicate instrument
------------- *Remember all advice given by Asuma is for entertainment purposes only. Asuma is not a licensed medical doctor, psychologist, or counselor and he does not play one on TV.*
Posted By: BebieM
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 18:18
I agree with you guys, putting an entire genre down is ignorant and wrong. But I also think saying that modern mainstream music (almost) never reaches a high level compared to prog or other more complex and inspired music it just true.
Posted By: Pixel Pirate
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 18:37
tuxon wrote:
I remember a laboratory test involving laboratory-rats.
When a group of scientists studied these rats and one of them began to laugh on what the Rats were doing the other scientist began to laugh too, for they wouldn't want to be the one left holding the joke.
Anyway scientific tests can prove anything you want them to prove.
Yes,even the truth...
------------- Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 18:45
Dr Dre and Dr Octagon....two members of the medical profession. Wow!
Rap must be intelligent.
Move over Fish, Roger Waters and Peter Hammill.....here comes Dr. Octagon.
Oh...by the way....that one tape loop during every single rap tune with that one bass note one can hear pounding from rap enthusiasts car.......pure genius! Brilliant!!!
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 18:45
The rap you guys talk of is pop music that has "urban" flare. There is
true hip-hop out there that's educational, positive, deep, and immensly
talented.
Posted By: joniox
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 18:50
Does prog make you smart?
Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 18:55
joniox wrote:
Does prog make you smart?
That's the big question. Please read the intro to the thread before asking your "clever" question.
Posted By: Pixel Pirate
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 18:56
I did read a test once,not an urban legend! proper scientists in a real laboratory and everything!,where they tested the effect certain types of music as opposed to silence had for improving the,for want of a better word,cognitive faculties,of mice. They played nothing but classical to one group of mice for 8 hours a day I think it was for a certain amount of time (I think it was a week,this is a few years ago and the memory is a bit hazy), heavy metal to another group of mice for the same amount of time and nothing at all to a third group of mice for the same amount of time. Then they tested each group separately in a maze to see which ones would make it through the maze the fastest. The mice that had not been listening to anyhing but silence completed the maze in the same time they had before the experiment,the mice who had been listening to classical music completed the maze markedly faster than they had before the experiment and the mice who had been listening to metal just bumped against the sides of the maze banging their heads against it,and when they finally managed to get out of the maze much later than the other mice,they started attacking each other.
Now,does this mean that people who listen to classical are very clever and people who listen to metal are stupid and agressive? It might of course,but how mice react to certain stimuli in a laboratory has usually very little to do with the actual lives of human beings. One situation can't necessarily automatically state something categorically about the other. For one thing: Humans aren't mice,even though they are our ancestors.
At least it's probably the only case in history of headbanging mice!
------------- Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Posted By: joniox
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 18:59
gdub411 wrote:
joniox wrote:
Does prog make you smart?
That's the big question. Please read the intro to the thread before asking your "clever" question.
I never meant to be more clever than I am. Just didn't bother to read all that. I should have.
Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 19:02
joniox wrote:
gdub411 wrote:
joniox wrote:
Does prog make you smart?
That's the big question. Please read the intro to the thread before asking your "clever" question.
I never meant to be more clever than I am. Just didn't bother to read all that. I should have.
No...my apologies.....I should be nice and encouraging to newcomers. Welcome to the Forums. Usually I am a swell guy!
Posted By: joniox
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 19:04
Friendliness of this board keeps surprising me.
Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 19:06
joniox wrote:
Friendliness of this board keeps surprising me.
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 19:09
joniox wrote:
Does prog make you smart?
No but Gdub can recommend something that does!
-------------
Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 19:12
Reed Lover wrote:
joniox wrote:
Does prog make you smart?
No but Gdub can recommend something that does!
plenty of protein is my suggestion.
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 19:15
gdub411 wrote:
Reed Lover wrote:
joniox wrote:
Does prog make you smart?
No but Gdub can recommend something that does!
plenty of protein is my suggestion.
EL Presidente Of De Third World Comedy State:
Smart=Sting
-------------
Posted By: Matt0001
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 19:19
Dr. Octagon, aka Dr. Dooom, aka Robbie Analog, but best known as Kool
Keith really is a genius. He has two classic albums--his album with DJ
Q-bert as Dr. Octagon, "Dr. Octagonecologyst," and Kool Keith's "Black
Elvis/Lost in Space." He has as many pseudonyms as he does albums and
each one really does has its own distinct characteristics. His raps are
incredibly creative and out there. The Dr. Octagon album is also a
classic in the turntable world for DJ Q-Bert's exhausting work. And
this is someone you'll never hear on the radio. Hip hop, just like any
good music, has it's water-downed, corporate mainstream scene, and it's
vital, creative underground scenes.
And to adress some of the more ignorant arguments: Sampling is in fact
a creative art. It's a re-creation and re-working of found materials.
Do you dismiss Joseph Cornell's work? And a lot of hip hop's
techniques--programmed beats, tape loops, studio assemblage, etc has
its roots in prog and other experimental music. The Moog is
nothing but an analog sampler. Frippertronics was pre-recorded tape
loops. The Beatles and Brian Wilson were assembling tracks in the
studio that would be impossible to recreate live back in the sixties.
And if you've ever seen a hip hop DJ work live, well, a DJ solo can be
as athletic, as bombastic, and as tedious as a Carl Palmer drum solo.
And for a great example of sampling being a creative act, listen to The
Avalanches' "Since I Left You." It's an entire album made of nothing
but found samples. It's as varied and creative as anything with "real" instruments.
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 19:29
Matt0001 wrote:
Dr. Octagon, aka Dr. Dooom, aka Robbie Analog, but best know as Kool Keith really is a genius.
If he is that good, why does he need so many aliases? Is on the run? Are the bailiffs after him?
He certainly isnt a genius when it comes to choosing names! Kool Keith-ha ha!
-------------
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 19:43
Matt, Rap is a genre based in a couple of chords repeated 100 times with a guy speaking (Yes I don't consider that singing) fast. The lyrics may be intelligent (even when I haven't heard many of this kind) but it's not music. It's almost as reading with a musical backup, in this case absolutely repetitive and lack of talent.
I really don't know very much about DJ's or even care about them, so answer me a question, Do they create music or do they mix other people's recordings adding some sounds, because I searched for a definition and found this one:
DJ: A person who mixes songs together for public performance. DJs perform on the radio or in clubs.
If this is all they do where is the creation and the talent?
Ivn
Posted By: asuma
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 20:02
i have seen djs work many a time, and they work
their ass off just as much as any other musician.
though they don't actually "play" an instrument. they
take something and mix it with another, and create
something new, and hopefully, special. ive tried it
before. you might think it's easy to match up a beat
with another. but it's not, especially when it's done
live, and you're making a switch from tracks. and rap
isn't always the same loop set on repeat. many
many rap songs are structured in, what can be, very
complex styles.
------------- *Remember all advice given by Asuma is for entertainment purposes only. Asuma is not a licensed medical doctor, psychologist, or counselor and he does not play one on TV.*
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 20:18
i have seen djs work many a time, and they work their ass off just as much as any other musician. though they don't actually "play" an instrument. they take something and mix it with another, and create something new,
I never said they are not working, I'm sure N'Sync and Backstreet boys worked very hard, but this DJ's are not creating anything new, not a single chord or even a note.
For God's sake, they are not even performing, they are usinga complex recorder a couple of turntables and a very expensive computer to reproduce music. They are simply using what more talented people created and mixing it, maybe it's hard, but breaking your back at the office is also hard, and nobody will pay a dime to see us work.
rap isn't always the same loop set on repeat. many many rap songs are structured in, what can be, very complex styles.
Probably, even when I didn't had the chance to listen them, but you should accept this intelligent rap may represent 1 or 2% of the genre.
Ivn
Posted By: Matt0001
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 20:33
ivan_2068 wrote:
Matt, Rap is a genre based in a couple of chords repeated 100 times with a guy speaking (Yes
I don't consider that singing) fast. The lyrics may be intelligent
(even when I haven't heard many of this kind) but it's not music. It's
almost as reading with a musical backup, in this case absolutely
repetitive and lack of talent.
I really don't know very much about DJ's or even care about them, so
answer me a question, Do they create music or do they mix other
people's recordings adding some sounds, because I searched for a
definition and found this one:
DJ: A person who mixes songs together for public performance. DJs perform on the radio or in clubs.
If this is all they do where is the creation and the talent?
Ivn
I'm not about to get into a "is rap music music?" argument. There is no
argument. Rap music is music. You may not like it, and you certainly
don't have to like it, but it is music. I guess probably there are
still a few old codgers out there who maintain that abstact
expresionism is not art, but they are just as wrong.
If you trully are curious and not just baiting an argument, email me
and I will gladly send you a CD or make a Rhapsody playlist or place
some MP3s in my Yahoo! briefcase of examples of good sampling and
turntableism. You might be surprised by what you hear.
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 21:11
ivan_2068 wrote:
Matt, Rap is a genre based in a couple of chords repeated 100 times with a guy speaking (Yes
I don't consider that singing) fast. The lyrics may be intelligent
(even when I haven't heard many of this kind) but it's not music. It's
almost as reading with a musical backup, in this case absolutely
repetitive and lack of talent.
Man, please don't generalize a genre
you obviously know nothing about. You still aren't talking about a
LARGE QUANTITY of rap music that has beats that aren't loops,
intellectual lyrics, and amazing emotion. Just as the Poppy music you
hear on the radio is not rock, the poppy music you hear on the radio
isn't rap. I thought you guys would have that figured out...
ivan_2068 wrote:
DJ's are not creating anything new, not a single chord or even a note.
You are talking about the DJ's that perform in clubs/on the radio. This is not the type of "artist" DJ.
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 22:13
Hey Root Pepper, then you're talking as underground or cult rap bands and DJ's. Pronbably they don't represent 1% of the genre.
In the case of Progressive Rock and Rock music, the good artists represent a very big percentage of the genre. So if we talk about a genre we must talk aboutthe general rule, not about the exceptions.
Ivn
Posted By: penguindf12
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 22:16
I really have no problem with good rap. (I know, most say there is no such thing)
But seriously, rap has the potential for good use. It can be used to convey real emotions, thoughts, and ideas. My problem with rap is that most rap artists do ONLY rap, and in doing so repeat cliches, recycle material, and sell out before they even begin writing. Most is pointless garbage, mass-manufactured like any other pop music. But it has potential, except a lot of people are biased against it since it has remained stagnant and BAD for so long. Some artists, I think, are trying to fix this. The only two rappers/hip-hop artists I can stand or even like are Eminem, Outkast, and Linkin Park (which is actually rap-rock). For instance, Jon Anderson uses a rap-like vocal on "Close to the Edge". But is it bad? NO! It's well-thought out, the music is original, the thoughts are progressive and the intent is not base and regressive as most rap is. I suspect that soon, whether we like it or not, progressive rap/hip-hop will appear (actually, it probably already has...but nobody cares yet).
But all that nonwithstanding, I still hate most rap because most of it sucks, frankly.
Posted By: Rob The Good
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 22:47
I wish people would just face it. Rap is a load of rubbish. It's not music and the guys who make it are commercialized and unsophisticated...I shudder to hear people call them "artists".
------------- And Jesus said unto John, "come forth and receive eternal life..."
Unfortunately, John came fifth and was stuck with a toaster.
Posted By: Matt0001
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 23:44
ivan_2068 wrote:
Hey Root Pepper, then you're talking as underground or cult rap bands and DJ's. Pronbably they don't represent 1% of the genre.
In the case of Progressive Rock and Rock music, the good artists
represent a very big percentage of the genre. So if we talk about a
genre we must talk aboutthe general rule, not about the exceptions.
Ivn
And just where are you getting these numbers? They're just pulled out
of the same place where you seem to keep your head. Hip hop is not out
to get you. If you don't like it, that's fine. It will progress and
move on without you. Just as it has for the past thirty years. Just
like rock'n'roll before it, it will not go away.
Posted By: aqualung28
Date Posted: January 09 2005 at 23:58
penguindf12 wrote:
I really have no problem with good rap. (I know, most say there is no such thing)
But seriously, rap has the potential for good use. It can be used to convey real emotions, thoughts, and ideas....
< Maybe these emotions (from the rap "music" I've heard at least)
------------- "O' lady look up in time o' lady look out of love
'n you should have us all
O' you should have us fall"
"Bill's Corpse" By Captain Beefheart
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 00:08
And just where are you getting these numbers? They're just pulled out of the same place where you seem to keep your head.
I would only ask you to keep the level of the discussion Matt, this weekend I've been involved in more than one and all have been absolutely civilized.
Of course the percentage is not exact, it's only a pleonasm to make clear those good prog and hip hop bands are the absolute minority (if they exist).
And it's obvious, every day hundreeds of new rap and hip hop bands go to the labels to try to have a chance and most of them have to play what the labels and radio want, if they want to survive they have to play crap, if not well they turn to underground bands that die of hunger, on this days only a few have the courage to make things fot theoir love to art.
If you don't like it, that's fine. It will progress and move on without you. Just as it has for the past thirty years. Just like rock'n'roll before it, it will not go away.
It's true, I don't like it, I also believe most of it has no artistic value, but I don't think it will progress, I believe they will vanish as Disco, New Wave or Punk did before.
Ivn
Posted By: the musical box
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 00:44
yes, rap does indeed chomp the chode (no offence meant), but there is some value to it. Some rap is tolerable, like Outkast for example who accualy make fun of themselves. I really dont care for rap at all, but if interested, check out a canadian rapper named K-OS. He's being called the saviour of hip-hop and he is starting a new genre which he calls, and i quote: "Progressive rap"..Who knows? Perhaps in time there will be a new sub-type called "prog rap"..only time will tell.
------------- something pretentious
Posted By: aqualung28
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 00:46
but do we really want 20 min + rap epics?
------------- "O' lady look up in time o' lady look out of love
'n you should have us all
O' you should have us fall"
"Bill's Corpse" By Captain Beefheart
Posted By: the musical box
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 00:51
aqualung28 wrote:
but do we really want 20 min + rap epics?
...i dont know, do we?
------------- something pretentious
Posted By: aqualung28
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 01:05
^ In Short....NO
------------- "O' lady look up in time o' lady look out of love
'n you should have us all
O' you should have us fall"
"Bill's Corpse" By Captain Beefheart
Posted By: the musical box
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 01:10
I 'd have to hear a "rap epic" first to have an informed opinion
------------- something pretentious
Posted By: aqualung28
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 01:13
but after you listened to it you wouldn't be able to tell us how it sounded due to the fatal brain damage it would cause.b
------------- "O' lady look up in time o' lady look out of love
'n you should have us all
O' you should have us fall"
"Bill's Corpse" By Captain Beefheart
Posted By: the musical box
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 01:18
on a different note: why does this thread keep on being moved?!?!
------------- something pretentious
Posted By: aqualung28
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 01:20
well its been moved to Discussions not Related to music for good reason
------------- "O' lady look up in time o' lady look out of love
'n you should have us all
O' you should have us fall"
"Bill's Corpse" By Captain Beefheart
Posted By: the musical box
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 01:23
its been moved about 5 times in the last hour!!
------------- something pretentious
Posted By: aqualung28
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 01:24
Has it?
------------- "O' lady look up in time o' lady look out of love
'n you should have us all
O' you should have us fall"
"Bill's Corpse" By Captain Beefheart
Posted By: the musical box
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 01:25
indeed it has
------------- something pretentious
Posted By: goose
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 03:48
ivan_2068 wrote:
Matt, Rap is a genre based in a couple of chords repeated 100 times with a guy speaking (Yes
I don't consider that singing) fast. The lyrics may be intelligent
(even when I haven't heard many of this kind) but it's not music. It's
almost as reading with a musical backup, in this case absolutely
repetitive and lack of talent.
Firstly, nowhere is it written that the backing must be repetitive. Admittedly, it usually is,
but likewise (I should think) the majority of rock music is simplistic
and repetitive (ergo, every rock band (including prog) must be without
value?)
Secondly, why does music have to have melodies? Drum solos (usually)
have no melodies, after all. And most of the time they're longer than
rap songs !
Posted By: goose
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 03:52
ivan_2068 wrote:
I never said they are not working, I'm sure N'Sync and Backstreet boys worked very hard, but this DJ's are not creating anything new, not a single chord or even a note.
Some hip-hop groups use live instrumentation. And some composers have
almost entirely used other people's work. I can't remember the name,
but I listened to a piece a few months ago, composed in the early part
of last century (I think) which quoted piece after piece with a solo
voice over the top. Plus, didn't Zappa quote Stravinsky and Mozart in
his pieces?
ivan_2068 wrote:
Probably, even when I didn't had the chance to listen them, but you
should accept this intelligent rap may represent 1 or 2% of the genre.
And much more than 2% of rock is intelligent?
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 11:35
Sorry Goose, but isn't one of the main characteristics of Progressive Rock not being repetetitive, but full of constant changes and odd timmings?
Music needs melody, it's a combination of rhythm and melody according to musical cannons.
Please, don't use drum solos, it's absurd, there are one or two drum solos in each concert and are only a small part of the music. Most of the rock and Prog concerts and albums have one or two drum solos in the middle or the end of a determined track. Don't compare it with rap, where melody almost doesn't exist.
Goose, Zappa Yes, ELP, Wakeman quote famous composers, but again as a small part of a composition by them, theydon't pass all concert playing other people's music, maybe except albums like Pictures at an Exhibition, but in that case is a new arrangement and it's only one album from the whole ELP catalogue.
I used the word intelligent Rap asa rhetorical figure refering to those bands that some people here mention as good music but I haven't heard yet as most of the people in this forum. And yes, I can mention at least 100 good rock bands well known by everyone here, but I doubt anybody can mention 10 good rap bands barely known by 10% of the people here.
Ivn
Posted By: sigod
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 11:53
Would a Prog/Rap crossover look like this then?
------------- I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
Posted By: charliefreakz
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 12:23
Christ! Threads like these depress me. I'm not a rap fan, but
each to their own. This is exactly the sort of thread that plays
straight into the hands of those who think that all prog-rock fans
are uppity little snobs. You are becoming the clich.
Posted By: oliverstoned
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 12:27
Yes, and i'd like to add that "Indifference is the greatest contempt!"
Posted By: goose
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 12:37
ivan_2068 wrote:
Sorry Goose, but isn't one of the main
characteristics of Progressive Rock not being repetetitive, but full of
constant changes and odd timmings?
And the progressive rappers aren't repetitive either! My point was:
While rap in a lot of cases is simple, some isn't.
Likewise:
While rock in a lot of cases is simple, some (prog) isn't.
With regards to sampling other music, I'm not going to argue; you have
a fair point in disliking it for that. It doesn't bother me, because I
don't bother about how music was created, but about the end result. But
there is some original and thought provoking rap around. And re drum
solos, while they may only take up a small portion of a concert, most
of the time there is no melody whatsoever, wheras in hip-hop songs the
backing will generally have a melody.
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 13:10
Please. Prog fans snob, take a visit to public places as rateyourmusic.com and read what people thinks about prog?, you'll find:
Crap
Yes, Who are they?
Not Kool
Boring
Old farts
Artsy fartsy
It's funny when people gives their opinion about rap in progressive forums everybody says they are crap, but now a lot of people says it's great, it's music or even that there exists progressive rap!!!!
All the rap I listened in my life is crap IMO, maybe there's some good rap, but it's very ocult.
I didn'tstarted this but I do believe rap or hip hop have no place in a progressive rock forum.
Ivn
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 13:13
PROUD TO BE A SNOB !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 13:16
Shocktaktix wrote:
Zappa was a square just like you old guyz
see how you are like old grandads, oh music of today it all noise. Not Kool you guyz.
Tails Of Topografic ocean that is one kool album .
dre & eminem rock, the kidz luv them
pioe and sliper bregade here again.
What about a square VC?
-------------
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 13:21
Does LEICESTER SQUARE count ??? I visited in August 2004
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 13:23
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 13:26
I've heard of Court Jester and Village Idiot but never.................
-------------
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 13:34
Looks like a Jesters Village
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 13:38
CLOWN TOWN:
-------------
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 13:45
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 13:50
Looks profane to me?
Is it the nudey version of The Bible?
-------------
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 13:51
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 14:57
Okay...my fault. I gave this thread a horrible name for what I really wanted to know about. My two questions at the beginning of the thread is what I was concerned about.
1. Is this a bunch of mularkey?
2. Could prog make one smarter as classical did?
This whole thread discussing the crappiness of rap REALLY wasn't my intention.
Posted By: emdiar
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 16:06
Hi gdub. By way of a serious answer to your thread, I am convinced that having a musical background as a child, and being a musician myself, has hightened my ability to pick up languages very quickly. A musician's ear is trained to distinguish tones and patterns in sound. Once you've learned the tune the words come easily.
------------- Perception is truth, ergo opinion is fact.
Posted By: Syzygy
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 16:50
------------- 'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute
to the already rich among us...'
Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom
Posted By: Wizard/TRueStar
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 19:10
gdub411 wrote:
2nd, if it is true, could the same hold true for someone who listens to progressive rock, would they actually get smarter like the guy who listened to classical.(that obviously hasn't been the case for me.)
I see this all around. Rap is not very involved. It is someone talking over a beat.
Rap is actually modern caveman music .
Progressive is to me a higher level of music (not in every case) than "classical". It has more limits. Prog done right (remember this is Whiz talking so every thing is prog) knows no limits.
It takes a higher musical awareness to understand and fully appreciate what this website has decided is progressive. I think that is why we are all here. Our awareness brings us together.
Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 19:20
Ha. I love it when the stereotypical brainy and/or wealthy character in a bad movie or film (or forum discussion) is represented as a classical fan. It's like how the Romans are always shown with british accents in biblical films, or how villains are more likely to have moustaches.
Classical music is not a priori intellectual (although the phrase 'a priori' is. ). Much of it is just pop music with the allure of antiquity and an orchestral presentation making it seem more complex. You don't have to be all that brainy to read Dickens, either...
And much the same idea applies to prog. The complex and/or exotic additions to the rock form often effectively mask the fact that most prog is not really all that different from any other type of music. It may tend to appeal to a certain above-average-intellectual segment of western society, but that's more a matter of sub-cultural taste than intellectual distinction.
I'm always a little dismayed by folks who think that their tastes elevate them. Take a look around at the forum...we're not all rocket scientists here. No matter what the subject matter, we're more likely to reduce it to the usual crap than maintain an enlightened level.
Posted By: Matt0001
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 20:26
Ok to get back to the original topic. I claimed this was an urban
legend. And even the "Mozart effect" that everyone assumes is true is
actually bunk science that has never been verified. See this article
for more information: http://skepdic.com/mozart.html - http://skepdic.com/mozart.html
And, Ivan, I'm sorry for the uncivil remark earlier. You are right,
there is no place for that sort of thing here. My offer to make a CD
for you still stands, however.
Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: January 10 2005 at 20:32
Matt0001 wrote:
Ok to get back to the original topic.
Good job dismissing my post. I'll remember this...you've crossed the wrong guy!
...just kidding, of course...one crazed violent stalker on this thread is enough.
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 11 2005 at 14:24
Well, at least here I'm not the only one who thinks the same about rap:
Poll Choice
Votes
Poll Statistics
1
[4.55%]
4
[18.18%]
2
[9.09%]
1
[4.55%]
14
[63.64%]
63.64% believes Rap is crap
77.28 believes its mediocre or less
18.8% believes it's good
1 lunatic believes it's brilliant
One person, one vote progheads have spoken.
Ivn
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 11 2005 at 14:30
Just read your post Matt0001, thanks for the apologize but it was not necessary, because we all sometimes loose temper in the heat of a discussion.
But again, I believe we are here to discuss different points of view.
Thanks for the CD offer, I'll send you my mail and in return I'll burn you a peruvian progressive album.
Ivn
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: January 11 2005 at 14:43
Wizard/TRueStar wrote:
Progressive is to me a higher level of music (not in every case) than "classical". It has more limits. Prog done right (remember this is Whiz talking so every thing is prog) knows no limits.
Not true - so-called "classical" has pushed every boundary there is to push. Prog is still dragging its heels in some areas - I have yet to hear a piece of prog use a note row (as in 12-note music) or some of the more esoteric aleatory methods of composition. There is no prog I know of that combines virtuosity with melody in the way Rakhmaninov could, and Debussy remains untouched in his ability to produce impressionistic music bordering on atonal yet somehow rich in harmony. Nothing in prog comes close to some of the more adventurous composers of the twentieth century; "classical" knows no limits, prog rock is limited by the "rock" boundary. Zappa probably knew this.
I've never heard of tests that prove whether prog makes you smarter or not - the only test results I've seen that have come to any conclusion were for the music of Bach and Mozart, both of whom achieved absolute purity in their music - so I would guess that would rule prog as a genre right out - except for those bands with a degree of purity.
From that we could surmise that those who listen to Pink Floyd, Marillion and Camel are pretty bright...
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: January 11 2005 at 16:15
Certif1ed wrote:
Wizard/TRueStar wrote:
Progressive is to me a higher level of music (not in every case) than "classical". It has more limits. Prog done right (remember this is Whiz talking so every thing is prog) knows no limits.
Not true - so-called "classical" has pushed every boundary there is to push. Prog is still dragging its heels in some areas - I have yet to hear a piece of prog use a note row (as in 12-note music) or some of the more esoteric aleatory methods of composition. There is no prog I know of that combines virtuosity with melody in the way Rakhmaninov could, and Debussy remains untouched in his ability to produce impressionistic music bordering on atonal yet somehow rich in harmony. Nothing in prog comes close to some of the more adventurous composers of the twentieth century; "classical" knows no limits, prog rock is limited by the "rock" boundary. Zappa probably knew this.
I've never heard of tests that prove whether prog makes you smarter or not - the only test results I've seen that have come to any conclusion were for the music of Bach and Mozart, both of whom achieved absolute purity in their music - so I would guess that would rule prog as a genre right out - except for those bands with a degree of purity.
From that we could surmise that those who listen to Pink Floyd, Marillion and Camel are pretty bright...
I find the use of "esoteric" and "aleatory" in the same sentence wonderfully ironic given the thread's title.
-------------
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: January 11 2005 at 19:55
ivan_2068 wrote:
Well, at least here I'm not the only one who thinks the same about rap
Oh well there you have it. And most people think prog sucks, so prog must be worthless too...
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 11 2005 at 21:23
At last I will answer this question.
I don't believe Prog' makes you smarter, what i do believe is that people who listen progressive rock are people with a higher level of culture or education.
In my country the prog' listener is a person that comes froma private schooll media A class (rich kids usually don't listen prog' bu7t the prog fan had to be wealthy enough to buy albums from other coutries because in Perpu doesn't exist), with a University degree (At least intelligent enough to go to a university and get a degree usually in science), most of them with a classical music formation when kids and at least one parent that listens this kind of music.
So, I believe Prog fans are at least as intelligent as any person who studies a career but with a higher cultural background.
About the scientific tests: A few years ago I was witnes of a test done by a Peruvian researcher who is also a proghead for his thesis; he prepared three rooms with mice and plants.
On the first one he played Classical music, in the second one Progressive Rock and in the third one only mainstream radio.
In the classical room, the plants grew faster and the mice increased their speed in the tests, despite the fact that the volume was very high.
In the Progressive Rock room, neither the mice or plants showed any change.
In the mainstream room, the mice became aggressive and most of the plants died.
So at least Progressive Rock is not harmful, except for our salary.
Ivn
Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: January 11 2005 at 21:30
Quote Ivan
On the first one he played Classical music, in the second one Progressive Rock and in the third one only mainstream radio.
In the classical room, the plants grew faster and the mice increased their speed in the tests, despite the fact that the volume was very high.
In the Progressive Rock room, neither the mice or plants showed any change.
In the mainstream room, the mice became aggressive and most of the plants died.
Did the scientist bother to enter the third room where mainstream was played for watering the plants and feeding the mice?
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 11 2005 at 21:31
Oh well there you have it. And most people think prog sucks, so prog must be worthless too...
We all knew (some of us since 30 years ago) that for the people who listen mainstream Prog' sucks, or to be more exact, they don't even know it exists.
Something absolutely normal for a genre that has no radio diffusion, it's ignored by media, suffers boycott from the musical industry (Ask Wakeman if AM wants to release again his albums) but when a genre like Rap that has radio, DJ's, Musical Industry and MTV support, is considered crap, well it means something
I'm not saying this poll proves it's worthless, only shows that I'm not the only one that believes Rap is crap.
Ivn
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 11 2005 at 21:42
tuxon wrote:
Quote Ivan
On the first one he played Classical music, in the second one Progressive Rock and in the third one only mainstream radio.
In the classical room, the plants grew faster and the mice increased their speed in the tests, despite the fact that the volume was very high.
In the Progressive Rock room, neither the mice or plants showed any change.
In the mainstream room, the mice became aggressive and most of the plants died.
Did the scientist bother to enter the third room where mainstream was played for watering the plants and feeding the mice?
Now seriously, this guy was an A+ student, he has two careers including Psychology, plus several masters, and got a 19 (Our system is over 20) average in the whole career; his work was absolutely serious because his degree depended in this research.
This work took several months and because I was a friend of him and his brother , I saw the how seriously he took it.
Ivn
Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: January 11 2005 at 21:53
It might be a serious studie, but what did he tried to prove/investigate.
Why wasn't there a 4th and a fifth room (silence and random sounds). Did he made one room of each or was it done in duplo. How can one relate/translate this results to (consiously absorbing) humans, or was that not the intend?
irrelevant questions maybe, but I can't take this studie seriously. (is there a website where I can check his findings).
With all love and respect to you. and your brothers studie.
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: January 11 2005 at 21:59
Please Tuxon we're talking about a University Thesis done in 1985 in Per (Internet was not common here until the very late 90's) you're asking too much if you want it on Internet.
In those years the Thesis (including mine) were done in typewritters because almost nobody had a PC, i had the luck to use word star even when I did it in the 1986)
I believe that the studies in silence and with ambiental noise were done before him and served as the starting point for his project (he measured the rooms taking the silence room results as the base and even compared his results with ambiental noise), he was trying to prove the influence of music in the behaviour.
By the way, he is not my brother, only a good friend.