Non-reviewable informative sections
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Help us improve the site
Forum Description: Help us improve the forums, and the site as a whole
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28079
Printed Date: March 04 2025 at 02:44
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Non-reviewable informative sections
Posted By: Revan
Subject: Non-reviewable informative sections
Date Posted: September 02 2006 at 15:19
I think all this problems about non-prog bands with prog moments or prog albums will be solved (partialy  ) if reviews are disabled in sections such as proto prog, prog related (and maybe a thrid one like this one http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=25861).There is my idea, take it or leave it.  Revan ------------- 
|
Replies:
Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: September 02 2006 at 15:21
|
Once a presence in the Archives, I think it fully deserves being reviewed, no matter what. The good possible reflection coming out from your suggestion would be for, within the review, people to stop bickering over what is that album (prog, not prog) and actually express notions about the album. If such cases were. ------------- 
|
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: September 03 2006 at 15:14
|
Revan,
You're suggestion was actually considered when the Beatles albums were added, but the owners of the site are keen that any album listed here should be open to being reviewed.
For non-prog albums it would be preferable, but not mandatory, that reviews look at any aspects of such albums which are prog, proto-prog, or prog related.
|