Ferrari or Porsche?
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics not related to music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=27795
Printed Date: February 03 2025 at 23:51 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Ferrari or Porsche?
Posted By: Mandrakeroot
Subject: Ferrari or Porsche?
Date Posted: August 26 2006 at 12:38
I Love Ferrari for Formula 1, Porsche for Endurance contest, Corvette for fashon, Fiat Nuova 500 for boby and Volkswagen for history!!!
-------------
|
Replies:
Posted By: maani
Date Posted: August 26 2006 at 12:43
Sorry, I'd take a Lambourghini or Maserati over both. Actually, I'd even take the new Aston Mrtin DB9 or Vantage.
|
Posted By: Kotro
Date Posted: August 26 2006 at 12:52
ASTON MARTIN. POWEEEERR!!!
That Clarkson gets me amuzed all the time...
------------- Bigger on the inside.
|
Posted By: Philéas
Date Posted: August 26 2006 at 13:34
Ferraris break and cost too much to repair. Besides, the new F430 must be the ugliest Ferrari ever. Porsche for the win!
|
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: August 26 2006 at 15:16
Porsche is too common and Ferrari too visible
Real class >>> Aston Martin
------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: August 26 2006 at 18:09
Sean Trane wrote:
Porsche is too common and Ferrari too visible
Real class >>> Aston Martin |
I agree with that, but the (discontinued, I believe) McLaren F1 would kick some major ass in any subject except maybe interior style. The thing is a beast.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: Kotro
Date Posted: August 26 2006 at 18:20
How about the new Bugatti?
------------- Bigger on the inside.
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: August 26 2006 at 18:22
General Info |
Price: |
$890,000 |
Miles Per Gallon: |
12 mpg |
Curb Weight: |
2840 lbs |
Layout: |
Mid-Engine/RWD |
Transmission: |
6-Speed Manual |
Engine |
Type: |
V12 |
Displacement: |
6064 cc |
Horsepower: |
627 bhp @ 7400 rpm |
Torque: |
479 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
Redline: |
7500 rpm |
Performance |
0-60 mph: |
3.3 sec |
0-100 mph: |
7.7 sec |
Quarter Mile: |
11.6 sec @ 125 mph |
Skidpad: |
.86g |
Top Speed: |
231 mph |
Braking, 60-0 mph: |
127 ft |
Slalom Speed: |
64.5 mph |
Like I said, a beast.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: maani
Date Posted: August 26 2006 at 18:49
Sheer power: McLaren or Shelby.
Babe magnet: Lamboughini or Maserati
Elegance and class: Aston Martin DB9 or Vantage
Personal touring car: Bentley Azure or Continental GTC
If I were a zillionaire: Maybach or Spyker D12
If they ever actually create a production model: Saab Aero X
|
Posted By: Phil
Date Posted: August 27 2006 at 18:53
stonebeard wrote:
General Info |
Price: |
$890,000 |
Miles Per Gallon: |
12 mpg |
Curb Weight: |
2840 lbs |
Layout: |
Mid-Engine/RWD |
Transmission: |
6-Speed Manual |
Engine |
Type: |
V12 |
Displacement: |
6064 cc |
Horsepower: |
627 bhp @ 7400 rpm |
Torque: |
479 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
Redline: |
7500 rpm |
Performance |
0-60 mph: |
3.3 sec |
0-100 mph: |
7.7 sec |
Quarter Mile: |
11.6 sec @ 125 mph |
Skidpad: |
.86g |
Top Speed: |
231 mph |
Braking, 60-0 mph: |
127 ft |
Slalom Speed: |
64.5 mph |
Like I said, a beast. | Nice choice...the McLaren F1...perhaps the ultimate supercar...its makers didn't compromise in its development. Not available new anymore but commands huge 2nd hand prices; the new big thing is the Bugatti Veyron but it looks overweight to me compared to the F1.
OK OK I haven't driven either; nor have I driven a Ferrari or Porsche but given the choice I'd go for the Porsche. Despite the Italian marques' attraction, the Porsche seems the better engineered and more usable beast to me, overall. Meantime I'll have to stick to my Mini!
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: August 27 2006 at 19:54
^Phil, your right about the Veyron being heavy, its nearly 2 tonns (and still does 250mph).
Stonie, those figuers are wrong, the F1 is $1,000,000 car and does 242mph.
Personally I prefer the small car companies like Spyker, Panoz, Noble, Morgan, TVR, Saleen, Calloway, Veemac, Cizeta, Koniggseg etc, stuff like this:
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: Yukorin
Date Posted: September 01 2006 at 06:15
-------------
|
Posted By: Mandrakeroot
Date Posted: September 01 2006 at 08:10
Yukorin wrote:
Seeing is believing...
http://www.eliica.com/ - http://www.eliica.com/
|
GAWRSH!!!
-------------
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: September 01 2006 at 11:49
Yukorin wrote:
Seeing is believing...
http://www.eliica.com/ - http://www.eliica.com/
|
The designer deserves to be shot for that monstrosoty.
Mind you, if your after weird and wonderfull try Rinspeed: http://www.rinspeed.com/pages/content/frames_e.htm - http://www.rinspeed.com/pages/content/frames_e.htm
These Swiss are weird
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: Yukorin
Date Posted: September 01 2006 at 12:22
-------------
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: September 01 2006 at 12:38
Yukorin wrote:
Love weird and wonderful. The 'Eliica' was a design for breaking the speed record in an electric car. Does 230mph apparantly. Have to say I wouldn't mind doin' me shoppin' in it !
|
I remember it now, I think it has something to do with Honda, not sure though. Still ugly as sh*t though .
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: Yukorin
Date Posted: September 01 2006 at 13:54
-------------
|
Posted By: AtLossForWords
Date Posted: September 01 2006 at 14:00
I'll definately take the Italian class of the Ferrari over the German engineering.
I don't drive, and I don't really care to, but if you ever understood the consqeuences of driving, not on your wallet but on the enviroment you live in, you might be the same way.
-------------
"Mastodon sucks giant monkey balls."
|
Posted By: Yukorin
Date Posted: September 01 2006 at 14:33
-------------
|
Posted By: N Ellingworth
Date Posted: September 01 2006 at 15:01
Mosler MT900 for me.
I've had a ride in one, the acceleration is amazing.
|
Posted By: Seyo
Date Posted: September 01 2006 at 16:06
Neither - I don't drive and don't like cars... but I vote for the Beetle
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: September 01 2006 at 16:58
N Ellingworth wrote:
Mosler MT900 for me.
I've had a ride in one, the acceleration is amazing.
|
You incredably lucky b*****d, closest I've got to that is watching one drive past in the Silverstone padock. Would that be the road leagal version or the racer?
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: mystic fred
Date Posted: September 01 2006 at 18:14
i agonised for ages over the merits of a Porsche over a Ferrari, i really couldn't make my mind up - in the end i couldn't decide and bought both, a vulgar show of decadence some people would think, a disgusting display of wealth, what would the neighbours think? and what about garage space?
....i doubt if the neighbours or anyone would ever find out, i could find space for them i suppose................the cars are only ten inches long!!
------------- Prog Archives Tour Van
|
Posted By: N Ellingworth
Date Posted: September 02 2006 at 03:09
sleeper wrote:
N Ellingworth wrote:
Mosler MT900 for me.
I've had a ride in one, the acceleration is amazing.
|
You incredably lucky b*****d, closest I've got to that is watching one drive past in the Silverstone padock. Would that be the road leagal version or the racer? |
The road legal one, unfortunately it was one of the low spec ones (a mere 400 bhp)
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: September 02 2006 at 15:05
N Ellingworth wrote:
sleeper wrote:
N Ellingworth wrote:
Mosler MT900 for me.
I've had a ride in one, the acceleration is amazing.
|
You incredably lucky b*****d, closest I've got to that is watching one drive past in the Silverstone padock. Would that be the road leagal version or the racer? |
The road legal one, unfortunately it was one of the low spec ones (a mere 400 bhp)
|
I didn realise they came in two specs, and thats still only 80hp of the 900R!
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: Arrrghus
Date Posted: September 02 2006 at 20:54
I DON'T CARE!!!!
Seriously, they're just cars!
-------------
|
Posted By: N Ellingworth
Date Posted: September 03 2006 at 09:03
sleeper wrote:
N Ellingworth wrote:
sleeper wrote:
N Ellingworth wrote:
Mosler MT900 for me.
I've had a ride in one, the acceleration is amazing.
|
You incredably lucky b*****d, closest I've got to that is watching one drive past in the Silverstone padock. Would that be the road leagal version or the racer? |
The road legal one, unfortunately it was one of the low spec ones (a mere 400 bhp)
|
I didn realise they came in two specs, and thats still only 80hp of the 900R! |
Well there's one being built at the moment which will have a 650 bhp engine, and apparently thats a standard option.
Also according to the factory owner there are several on the road with over 700 bhp, most of them in Germany.
|
Posted By: darksinger
Date Posted: September 03 2006 at 09:39
-------------
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: September 03 2006 at 18:03
First I've heard of it, as far as I know (knew) all MT900's had tuned Chevy small block engines putting out 400-450hp, and its main objective was to be a GT2 class car, so wouldnt changing specs on each car get a bit confuseing when homoligating the car. Of course this could be all aftermarket stuff which wouldnt matter as it isnt factory spec.
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: Phil
Date Posted: September 04 2006 at 10:04
I love both. But, own neither. I reckon if I could afford one, it'd probably be a Porsche 911 Carrera though - a little more discreet than a Ferrari, probably just as fast, and more usable day in day out. Or Aston Martin actually.....in the meantime am very happy to stick with my Mini.
|
Posted By: N Ellingworth
Date Posted: September 06 2006 at 06:28
sleeper wrote:
First I've heard of it, as far as I know (knew) all MT900's had tuned Chevy small block engines putting out 400-450hp, and its main objective was to be a GT2 class car, so wouldnt changing specs on each car get a bit confuseing when homoligating the car. Of course this could be all aftermarket stuff which wouldnt matter as it isnt factory spec. |
The problem is that there are several different factories building them, some to the official spec and some taking the basic chassis and body and putting their own spec running gear in. The factory I visited builds the standard, racing and high(er) spec cars.
|
Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: September 06 2006 at 08:15
I voted Ferrari as I have driven one (briefly).
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: September 06 2006 at 17:28
N Ellingworth wrote:
sleeper wrote:
First I've heard of it, as far as I know (knew) all MT900's had tuned Chevy small block engines putting out 400-450hp, and its main objective was to be a GT2 class car, so wouldnt changing specs on each car get a bit confuseing when homoligating the car. Of course this could be all aftermarket stuff which wouldnt matter as it isnt factory spec. |
The problem is that there are several different factories building them, some to the official spec and some taking the basic chassis and body and putting their own spec running gear in. The factory I visited builds the standard, racing and high(er) spec cars.
|
I didnt know this, I always thought that there was a single Mosler factory (I think somewere like Virginia state) and Martin Short's Rollcentre operation imported them to Europe. You learn something every day.
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: N Ellingworth
Date Posted: September 07 2006 at 08:15
sleeper wrote:
Quote-a-thon shortened
I didnt know this, I always thought that there was a single Mosler factory (I think somewere like Virginia state) and Martin Short's Rollcentre operation imported them to Europe. You learn something every day.
|
I believe that is the way the standard cars get here but the other factories which build them buy the rights to build the design and tend to build the cars to their customers' specification.
|
Posted By: el böthy
Date Posted: September 08 2006 at 14:29
Fiat? heheheh Fehler In Aller Teile the german talking people will find that hilarious...
where is the option "Bike"?
------------- "You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
Posted By: babydoctor
Date Posted: September 17 2006 at 13:52
I vote for legs and feet...or else powered parachute.
|
Posted By: Vompatti
Date Posted: September 17 2006 at 14:39
Either would make a nice decoration.
|
Posted By: bhikkhu
Date Posted: September 17 2006 at 15:21
Gary Fisher. Great bicycles!
------------- a.k.a. H.T.
http://riekels.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow - http://riekels.wordpress.com
|
Posted By: markosherrera
Date Posted: December 09 2006 at 00:11
|