The development of prog
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Music Lounge
Forum Description: General progressive music discussions
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=275
Printed Date: November 26 2024 at 20:53 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: The development of prog
Posted By: Joren
Subject: The development of prog
Date Posted: March 06 2004 at 07:22
HI!
I'm writing a large paper for school. Of course it's about (the development of) progressive rock, and I thought maybe you could help me a bit
I wonder what bands you consider as being the most influential, the most important, or just the BEST bands of each decade.
So what do you think are the best progbands from the sixties, seventies, eighties and nineties?
Thanks in advance!
Joren
|
Replies:
Posted By: Aerandir
Date Posted: March 06 2004 at 08:34
Hello and a very interesting paper you chose!
i think this linik will help you http://www.encyclopedia.com/searchpool.asp?target=progressive+rock - http://www.encyclopedia.com/searchpool.asp?target=progressiv e+rock you can also search for other prog-genres! everything is included!
Concerning my opinion of which bands were more influential i would say 4 among dozens that exist! Pink Floyd , Jethro Tull , Genesis and (oh yes, i'm gonna say it..) Dream Theater
------------- That which doesn't kill you, postpones the inevitable
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 06 2004 at 08:48
Thanks Aerandir! I will not forget Dream Theater (how could I? )
I tried to make a list for the sixties and seventies already. Please correct/criticise it! (I need it)
MOST IMPORTANT PROGBANDS OF THE SIXTIES:
Caravan
Colosseum
Genesis
Jethro Tull
King Crimson
Moody Blues
Nice, The
Pink Floyd
Renaissance?
Soft Machine
Van Der Graaaf Generator
Vanilla Fudge
Yes
MOST IMPORTANT PROGBANDS OF THE SEVENTIES:
New
Amon Düül II?
Ange?
Banco Del Mutuo Soccorso
Barclay James Harvest
Brand X
Camel
Can
Colosseum II?
Eloy
Emerson, Lake And Palmer
Focus
Gentle Giant
Gong?
Hawkwind
Magma
Mahavishnu Orchestra
Manfred Mann’s Earth Band
Oldfield, Mike
Premiata Forneria Marconi (PFM)?
Rush
Saga?
Strawbs?
Old (already wel-known in the sxties)
Caravan
Jethro Tull
Genesis
King Crimson
Moody Blues
Pink Floyd
Renaissance?
Soft Machine?
Van Der Graaaf Generator
Yes
|
Posted By: lucas
Date Posted: March 06 2004 at 11:21
A difficult task...
Late sixties and beginnig of the seventies :   ;   ;   ;   ;   ; I would say it all began with psychedelic music, i. e. essentially Jimi Hendrix and earlier Pink Floyd (all their stuff with Syd Barrett). [Some people say that the Beatles also had a contribution to the prog movement]. Then came bands such as King Crimson and Yes at the end of the sixties. King Crimson, along with Van der Graaf Generator helped define a sub-genre of the progressive music called hard-prog ('hard' refering to the tormented atmosphere of their records, however 'In the court of the crimson King' is symphonical prog). Yes were playing symphonical rock, so called because of the use of a symphonic orchestra. Genesis were already recording at the end of the sixties but their links to the progressive rock were not yet defined. With the album 'Trespass', things became clear about Genesis. Yes and Genesis remain icons in the symphonical rock music. Other bands followed their steps later : Gentle Giant, Camel among others. At the same time as symphonical rock was developing in Great Britain, many italian bands were performing a similar type of music : Banco del Mutuo Soccorso, Premiata Forneria Marconi, Le Orme, Quella Vecchia Locanda among others. These two countries were the most prolific as far as progressive rock is concerned. Let's go back to England to focus on another subgenre that comes from the Canterbury county. Caravan defined that subgenre with their second album and bands like Hatfield and the North and later National Health followed (plus a band that didn't come from England but from the USA, Happy The Man). The first Gong album (Camembert Electrique, featuring Pip Pyle on drums who later joined Hatfield and National Health) belongs also to this subgenre. Daevid Allen (who later founded Gong) formed with Robert Wyatt Soft Machine, a band that could be regarded as belonging to the Canterbury scene for their first three releases, but that turned to jazz-fusion (with 'third'), another subgenre that included also later Bruford and Brand X, and in the USA Frank Zappa. So, at the beginning of the seventies, 3 subgenres are already established : symphonical (Yes, Genesis), canterbury (Caravan, earlier Gong), hard-prog (King Crimson, VDGG).
The seventies :   ;   ;   ;   ;   ; After Syd Barrett left Pink Floyd, their music became softer with ethereal passages : they defined a new subgenre, space-rock. Gong were also following the same way with 'Angel's egg' (but with humour), their best record to date. After the Yardbirds split, Keith Relf formed with his wife Jane the band Renaissance, a group that blended folk music with progressive rock. Along with Jethro Tull, Renaissance were qualified as a folk-prog band. The popularity of Renaissance grew after Annie Haslam replaced Jane Relf on vocals and they released the great 'Scheherazade and other stories' in 1975. Jethro Tull released 'Aqualung' in 1971, an album that is considered as a classic today, but I would recommend the follow-up 'Thick as a brick' as an introduction to their contribution to the folk-prog scene. Another subgenre of the progressive rock was also developing in the seventies : art-rock, led by bands such as Supertramp, Roxy Music, 10 CC... These groups were playing a simpler music than in the other prog subgenres. In Germany, a group called Tangerine Dream was playing a music based exclusively on electronic instruments, hence their music was called 'Electronic' (or 'New Age'), although it may include many not electonic instruments (as is the case for Mike Oldfield ). Vangelis and Synergy belong also to this subgenre. Many of the german bands that appeared at the beginning of the seventies were classified as 'Krautrock', an additional subgenre of the progressive rock, including Grobschnitt, Amon Düül, Ash Ra Tempel. A minimalistic form of the 'electronic' music appeared also in the seventies : ambient. Kraftwerk, Brian Eno, Cluster belong to this category. Moreover, in England a subgenre based on improvisation and with a jazz background appeared in 1973 with the release of Henry Cow's 'Leg End' (RIO, rock in opposition). This subgenre is recommended only to fans of free-jazz or those who like exploration. I forgot to mention that Emerson, Lake and Palmer, a band that gathered members of King Crimson, Atomic Rooster and The Nice released albums ('Tarkus' being regarded as their best) belonging to a subgenre called classical-prog, as they often feature a song that is an adaptation of a piece of classical music (Pictures at an exhibition for example). The Nice and Rick Wakeman belong also to this subgenre. In the USA, some groups tried to mix hard-rock with progressive elements, such bands are Rush, Styx among others (Kansas could also be added to this category but it is also close to the english symphonic prog scene). They were called pomp-prog as the intros and outros of some of their songs are 'pompous'. I mentioned previously the development of a jazz-fusion scene with Brand X (featuring Phil Collins), Bruford, and Zappa, the music of this latter could be considered as a unique subgenre (mix of jazz, doo-wap, rock...). Another band was also strongly rooted in jazz but included also influences ranging from Stockhausen to Duke Ellington, via opera : Magma, who created the Zeuhl subgenre, with a language intelligible only by them (kobaïa). So, at the end of the seventies you have 10 new subgenres in the progressive rock : art-rock, folk-prog, classical-prog, RIO, jazz-fusion, Zeuhl, ambient, electronic, krautrock, pomp-prog.
The eighties : The progressive rock was supplanted by the punk movement at the end of the seventies, a 'music' which aim was to prove that everyone could play music. Punk gave rise to the cold wave in the eighties and prog rock was reduced to what was called neo-prog (a simpler form of the symphonic prog but with much present drums), and an embryon of what became at the beginning of the nineties the metal-prog. Saga were probably the first to play this neo-prog, but Marillion and IQ are the best representatives of this subgenre. Landmark albums include 'Misplaced childhood' by Marillion and 'Ever' by IQ.
The nineties : metal-prog developed with Dream Theater's 'Images and words'. However, in the eighties some groups were already playing a heavy-metal-based progressive music : Queensryche, Fates Warning, Watchtower. Thanks to Mike Varney in the USA, who founded the prog label Magna Carta, and in Europe the Inside Out label, the nineties saw a revival of the prog-rock (mainly metal-prog). In the USA, apart from metal-prog, Spock's Beard were playing a symphonical prog with references to Gentle Giant and Genesis and Echolyn and Izz were playing a music closer to neo-prog. In the Northern Europe, a scandinavian symphonic prog scene developed with bands such as The Flower Kings, Anglagard and Sinkadus. A post-RIO scene also developed with Djam Karet, Thinking Plague... Some groups play jazz-fusion : Kenso, Cartoone, Deus ex Machina. Porcupine Tree and Ozric Tentacles play space-rock. Collage, Clepsydra are great bands that are strongly influenced by IQ and Marillion. Thus, in the nineties you have a revival of the prog scene not only with the appearance of a new subgenre : metal-prog but also with bands playing the styles developed in the seventies.
I hope these informations will help you in your investigation.
------------- "Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
Posted By: lucas
Date Posted: March 06 2004 at 12:34
You can add :
Zappa (sixties, seventies, eighties, (nineties ?))
Bruford (seventies)
Tangerine Dream (seventies, eighties, nineties)
Greenslade (seventies)
Utopia (seventies)
Happy The Man (seventies)
Kansas (seventies, eighties...)
Supertramp (seventies)
Roxy music (seventies, eighties)
Egg (seventies)
Hatfiels and the North (seventies)
National Health (seventies)
Synergy (seventies, eighties)
UK (seventies)
Dixie Dregs (seventies, eighties, nineties)
Henry Cow (seventies)
Le Orme (sixties, seventies)
Locanda delle fate (seventies)
Gryphon (seventies)
------------- "Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: March 06 2004 at 14:09
Whoa Lucas! Ithink you just wrote the guy's school assignment for him!
|
Posted By: Alexander
Date Posted: March 06 2004 at 15:18
Vibrationbaby wrote:
Whoa Lucas! Ithink you just wrote the guy's school assignment for him! |
Yeah, pretty much.
------------- On A Dilemmia Between What I Need & What I Just Want
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 07 2004 at 10:53
To Lucas:
- First of all: THANK YOU! for taking the time to help me (and how!)
- I think there still are some discutable points (10cc and Roxy Music are not considered prog by everybody)
- You named some sub-genres that I won't use. I had already decided that I would use the sub-genres as mentioned on the progarchives homepage.
- There's already a whole chapter in my paper about Zappa and Beefheart (I think they were the 'pioneers')
- Also THANKS for the bandnames I forgot. I heard UK deservers a special place! And Bruford's a legend...
- My problem was that I didn't grow up in the seventies and I'm not familiar with all progressive rock sub-genres. You really helped me out here!
THANKS
A
LOT
!!
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 07 2004 at 10:56
By the way: Do you think I mentioned any bands that don't deserve it?
|
Posted By: lucas
Date Posted: March 07 2004 at 13:29
I am 24 years old, so I didn't know the seventies too. About the bands you mentioned, I think they all deserve to be cited.
------------- "Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 07 2004 at 13:32
Posted By: maani
Date Posted: March 07 2004 at 20:10
Joren/Lucas:
First, I am one who does believe that 10CC is "prog," to be placed in the same category as Supertramp. (After all, they were heavily influenced by one another, so if Supertramp deserves a spot, so does 10CC).
There are at least two other bands - one "accepted," one not - that I would add to the list. Although something of a latecomer to the prog scene, The Church began recording in the early 80s, and is now considered by many to be a leader in the prog movement (just look at the reviews of their most recent album!).
Also, XTC deserves a place here, also in the same general category as Supertramp and 10CC.
Note to Lucas: Did you study the genre specifically? Because at 24, you sound like one of us "older" folks who actually lived through the entire prog era, right from the beginning.
Peace.
|
Posted By: maani
Date Posted: March 07 2004 at 20:20
Joren:
BTW, you might want to check out the following three "threads" for additional discussions on prog:
"Is classic prog timeless?"
"Fly Like An Eagle..."
"What defines prog music?"
All three have interesting, informative discussions on progressive music.
Peace.
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 08 2004 at 07:01
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 08 2004 at 07:03
Addition: I think the most important thing about prog is, that the music crosses borders and combines several styles in great, lengthy songs. And a typical thing about prog is that many bands love the mellotron and the flute.
|
Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: March 08 2004 at 16:59
Lucas: Good, thoughtful essay outline! Lots of work -- well done!
One minor correction: RUSH are from Canada, not America. Sometimes, outside North America, there's a tendency to equate North America (Canada, United States & Mexico) with America (the U.S. only). That's like saying that Austria is a part of Germany, that Great Britain is the same as England, that New Zealand is the same as Australia, or that France belongs to Spain! Canada has roughly 1/10th of the population of the U.S., so has proportionally fewer internationally-successful bands -- especially prog bands! Thus, we tend to be proud of the ones we have, and Rush is one of OURS!
I also wouldn't call the music of Kraftwerk "ambient." It's much too structured and dynamic and lively to fit in with (early) Tangerine Dream and Eno's "shapeless," flowing ambient recordings. I have trouble with the whole sub-genre of "Krautrock," for that matter. It seems to imply a sameness, or a lack of diversity in German rock, which is just not the reality. I also think that the term "Kraut" is likely insulting to many Germans, coming as it does from WW1 & WW2 Allied soldiers' nickname for the Germans, who were supposed to eat a lot of saurkraut, which is "sour" (or pickled) cabbage. Thus, "Kraut" seems to mean "cabbage." How would the rest of us like our music to be labelled "Limeyrock," "Japrock" ("Ricerock?"), "Canuckrock," "Spicrock," "Yankrock," "Pastarock," or "Frogrock?" Food for thought....
PS to Joren: Good luck with the essay!
------------- "And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
|
Posted By: semismart
Date Posted: March 08 2004 at 20:14
Hey, I didn't see Argent, Uriah Heep, Blood sweat and Tears, Iron Butterfly, Rare Earth, Cream, or The Chambers Brothers mentioned.
------------- <i>Sports cars</i>, helping ugly men get sex since 1954.
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 09 2004 at 04:18
Peter Rideout wrote:
Lucas: Good, thoughtful essay outline! Lots of work -- well done!
One minor correction: RUSH are from Canada, not America. Sometimes, outside North America, there's a tendency to equate North America (Canada, United States & Mexico) with America (the U.S. only). That's like saying that Austria is a part of Germany, that Great Britain is the same as England, that New Zealand is the same as Australia, or that France belongs to Spain! Canada has roughly 1/10th of the population of the U.S., so has proportionally fewer internationally-successful bands -- especially prog bands! Thus, we tend to be proud of the ones we have, and Rush is one of OURS!
I also wouldn't call the music of Kraftwerk "ambient." It's much too structured and dynamic and lively to fit in with (early) Tangerine Dream and Eno's "shapeless," flowing ambient recordings. I have trouble with the whole sub-genre of "Krautrock," for that matter. It seems to imply a sameness, or a lack of diversity in German rock, which is just not the reality. I also think that the term "Kraut" is likely insulting to many Germans, coming as it does from WW1 & WW2 Allied soldiers' nickname for the Germans, who were supposed to eat a lot of saurkraut, which is "sour" (or pickled) cabbage. Thus, "Kraut" seems to mean "cabbage." How would the rest of us like our music to be labelled "Limeyrock," "Japrock" ("Ricerock?"), "Canuckrock," "Spicrock," "Yankrock," "Pastarock," or "Frogrock?" Food for thought....
PS to Joren: Good luck with the essay!
|
Kraftwerk: I don't think it's ambient either.
Krautrock: The problem is, everybody is familiar with that name now... and 'ricerock' sounds pretty cool!
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 09 2004 at 04:19
semismart wrote:
Hey, I didn't see Argent, Uriah Heep, Blood sweat and Tears, Iron Butterfly, Rare Earth, Cream, or The Chambers Brothers mentioned. |
I'm trying to talk only about PURE prog rock. Iron Butterfly had their great song, but they're not considered real prog, as far as I know... And have you seen my list? I've got enough to do!
|
Posted By: janhuss
Date Posted: March 09 2004 at 04:25
between the most important prog. rock bands of the 90s (not prog. metal): anglagard, anekdoten & porcupine tree.
|
Posted By: Aerandir
Date Posted: March 09 2004 at 08:20
sometimes when i read this forum i wonder : OH my GOD was there any other group that didn't prog through 70s and 80's ?
Come to think about it... I don't know who invented those genres but don't you think they are too much? Folk prog , Symphonic Prog , Rock prog , Metal prog, Pomp prog, Space prog and the list goes on ? My question is that : Which group (of the known) didn't prog? Were all those group that we mention indeed progged or we just say it just to show how important and talented artists does prog has?
Sometimes i have the feeling that Progressive is a subgenre of Rock music that has a lot of subgenres, Rock included!!! if you know what i mean..
Any help ?
------------- That which doesn't kill you, postpones the inevitable
|
Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: March 09 2004 at 10:58
I think aerandir has a valid point. Jazz and classical music have their offshoots as well. Why can`t we just stick to terms like jazz-rock for say,The Mahavishnu Orchestra, Classical Rock for bands like Focus or as I suggested on an earlier thread Experimental Rock. This would eliminate a lot of confusion and we could categorize everyone from Dream Theatre to Bill Bruford`s Earthworks under the same roof
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 09 2004 at 14:42
Hey! Focus is not just 'Classical Rock'
Focus made some of the best progrock there is!!!
|
Posted By: Aerandir
Date Posted: March 09 2004 at 15:19
For me there are 4 big categories
1. Progressive Metal : Distinctive from it's heavier music and often from it's year of foundation as we come closer to "now" bands tend to adapt a heavier style. examples : Dream Theater , Psychotic Waltz, Fates Warning , Pain of Salvation , Evergrey etc..
2. Progressive Rock : Close to Prog Metal but with more "gentle" music. examples : Pink Floyd, Rush, Van der Graaf generator etc
3. Classical/Symphonic Rock : Distinctive from the regylar use of classic instruments such as flutes, violins and its tone of music which tends to be softer than progressive rock. examples : Jethro Tull , Genesis , The Moody Blues, Focus
4. Jazz/Rock groups : Close to Progressive Rock but with serious Jazz Influence. Usually they don't have a lot of lyrics. Example : Mahavishnu Orchestra
To me it seems like a good dinstiction. I'm aware that Rush and Floyd are not the same but so are The Dark Side of the Moon and Wall. Even 2 albums from the same band can have differences (and it's welcomed).
------------- That which doesn't kill you, postpones the inevitable
|
Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: March 09 2004 at 17:37
Joren wrote:
Hey! Focus is not just 'Classical Rock'
Focus made some of the best progrock there is!!! | Believe it or not I read an interview with Jan Akkerman in some guitar magazine back in the 70`s where he claims that Focus invented heavy metal!
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 03:56
Well, of course Led Zep/Deep Purple and The Sabs did that, but I think Focus had a lot of influence with Hocus Pocus!
|
Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 10:40
I`ve read a lot of interviews with Akkerman over the years and he is not the easiest guy to interview according to those who have interviewed him and he has the tendancy to say a lot of of the wall things. Nevertheless he is one of my favourite guitar players of all time. You should check out some of his pre-Focus work if you can find it.
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 10:47
Was he in Brainbox before or after Focus?
maybe I'd better ask first: Do you know Brainbox? I mean, they're pretty well-known in Holland, but I must not forget, they're a Dutch band!
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 11:18
I found it! Before Focus, Jan Akkerman was in The Hunters (I don't know them) and BRAINBOX. The latter had some GREAT songs. Try to download: "Dark Rose", "Doomsday Train" and "Down Man". It's great classic hardrock with flute!
|
Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 12:56
I've got two Brainbox albums but Akkerman is only on one of them. I also have the CD release of the Akkerman Brainbox album which has bonus tracks. I only have one recording of him with The Hunters which is on a compilation album from the Early 80's called the Essental Jan Akkerman and the track is a killer "The Russian Spy And I". He also played in a band called Johnny and the Cellar Rockers but I've never come across any of these. This was pre-Hunters. Glad to see someone out there who is interested in this frequently overlooked guitar god. There is a lot more to Akkerman than "Hocus Pocus"!
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 13:20
Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 14:22
Yeah that's me. I have over 2,000 albums I accumulated mostly during th 1970's and 1980's. Not only prog albums but a lot of jazz as well. I never bought an album because it was a "collectors" item It was always for the music, although I do have a few which are worth something. The thing that really bothers me about these guys who collect records just for the sake of it is that they drive up the prices of records that people like myself want just for the music.
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 15:01
Well, I wasn't THAT fanatic. I just thought it was nice to have some weird records.
I think I have about 400 CD's (and 30 LP's or so, just for collecting, almost all of them are albums I also have on CD, I hardly ever play them). And I think half of it is downloaded . I don't have all the money in the world, you know. But now, my goal is to buy all real great CD's (including Frank Zappa), and not download them.
But your collection is awesome. 2000 jazz and prog records!
You know the book 1000 Record Covers? It's from a man who also had thousands of records, and he made a selection of the greatest covers. I love that book! What was his name again... Schultz? It was a book from 'Taschen'.
|
Posted By: Dan Bobrowski
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 16:43
2,000? Good Gracious Man, when do you get laid?
I've got about 500-700 and my old lady thinks I'm obsessed.
I got about 33 or so Allan Holdsworth related discs, all the Rush, Floyd, Beatles, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH.
2,000? Holy Sheep, Batman.
So, Vibration you must own this stuff:
Greetings!My name is Dale Hauskins.I was the Los Angeles Californian Guitarist of the Swiss(Luzern/Weggis)progressive rock band FLAME DREAM(6 albums on Phonogram's Vertigo label produced by John Acock(Steve Hackett/Nick Magnus/Genesis/Steel Eye Span/ELO/Deep Pulple/etc!))Mostly recorded at Patrick Moraz's studio in Geneve,Switzerland 1979-1986 http://www.rire-sous-cape.ch/counting-out-time/flame-dream/flame-dream-index.htm - http://www.rire-sous-cape.ch/counting-out-time/flame-dream/f lame-dream-index.htm http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/flamedream/ - http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/flamedream/ Currently available for Recording(Tracking)Tours & Gigs... Dale Hauskins:Cel.#(714)444-6951 Email: mailto:[email protected] - [email protected] mailto:[email protected] - [email protected] Reggae Jazz/Rock Hip-Hop Guitarist.CD/Tour credits:Bamiki Bandula(Massive McGregor);Pato Banton(Tour 2001);Bargain Music("The Magic is Over"CD BEATVILLE 2003);Big Cat("California"CD 2004);Einstein Brown(Sapadilla/Pannist;CD/Tours);Dean Butterworth;Phil Chen;Calypso Rose;Martin Campbell(CD/Tour 2001-2002);Santa Davis;Rock Deadrick;Dominators;Mikey Dread;Majek Fashek("Little Patience"CD 2004/Tour 2000-2003);Anna Fisher("Ying Yang"CD 2004);Flame Dream(Swiss progressive rock group,6 CDs Phonogram(Vertigo)Produced by John Acock(Steve Hackett));Fully Fullwood("For All Time"CD 2004/Tours);Russ Henry;Drew Hester;Joe Higgs;Jah Soldiers Band(Tour 2001-2002);Jawge Hughes("Come on Back"CD 2002/Tour 2001);Jesus Wore Dickies("Friends of Jesus"CD SKUNK 2003);Humble Soul("Jah Love" CD/2001); Peter Hunnigale;Winston Hussey;Mike Hyde;KONTIKI("Stand Tall"CD 2003);Kyng Arthur("Mister Master" CD-2000,"Prisoner of The Flesh" CD 2002);Scientist(Hopeton Brown);Tippa Irie(Tours 1999- 2003);Remi Kabaka;Nick Magnus(Steve Hackett/Enid);Carl McGregor(Bamiki Bandula)Musical Sniper(aka Rappa Robert Tour 2001);Johnny Osbourne(Tour 2001-2002);Steve Reid;The Specs;Upstream;Dave Wakeling;April Weller;John Wolf-Brennan;Cece Worell; etc. http://www.gigmasters.com/artists/DaleHauskins - http://www.gigmasters.com/artists/DaleHauskins http://profiles.yahoo.com/dalehauskins - http://profiles.yahoo.com/dalehauskins http://www.capesounds.com/BandDetail.asp?BandID=266 - http://www.capesounds.com/BandDetail.asp?BandID=266 http://counting-out-time.virtua.ch/flame-dream/flame-dream-index.htm - http://counting-out-time.virtua.ch/flame-dream/flame-dream-i ndex.htm http://www.dubmusic.com/html/members.html - http://www.dubmusic.com/html/members.html http://www.ocweekly.com/ink/03/14/feedback-seigal.php - http://www.ocweekly.com/ink/03/14/feedback-seigal.php
Edited by dalehauskins on 11 March 2004 at 15:55
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 16:51
What's going on? That asshole is posting that throughout the entire forum!! Can't anybody do something about that?! I already sent him a private message, but he didn't answer!
|
Posted By: Dan Bobrowski
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 17:01
Sorry Joren, I posted this one as a joke. I hope he gets the message.
|
Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 18:09
Yeah I was a little out of control for a while, but a lot of my collection I bought second hand. Especially in the early eighties tons of this prog rock was showing up in second hand music stores and it was dirt cheap! I checked out Flame Dream on the archives just to see if they really existed. I`ve never heard of anything this guy`s refering to. The only Swiss band I`ve ever heard of besides Brainticket was that cheesee heavy metal band Krokus who did bad cover versions of songs like American Woman back in the early eighties.
|
Posted By: semismart
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 18:37
Joren wrote:
semismart wrote:
Hey, I didn't see Argent, Uriah Heep, Blood sweat and Tears, Iron Butterfly, Rare Earth, Cream, or The Chambers Brothers mentioned. |
I'm trying to talk only about PURE prog rock. Iron Butterfly had their great song, but they're not considered real prog, as far as I know... And have you seen my list? I've got enough to do!
|
Hey no problem. You asked, I answered. You did look a little light in 60s though!
------------- <i>Sports cars</i>, helping ugly men get sex since 1954.
|
Posted By: Andyliftuk
Date Posted: March 10 2004 at 20:43
You forgot to mention 'It Bites'!!!....they were defintely an insperation to a lot of prog bands that formed torwards the late eighties/ early nineties.......including Dream Theater. (Jon Petrucci once said that Frank Dunnerey was a very underated guitarist and 'It Bites!' were certainly an underated great Prog band of the eighties).....'It Bites!' most certainly influenced one of my old bands 'Summer Indoors'!!
------------- If it aint broke, dont fix it
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 11 2004 at 06:16
semismart wrote:
Joren wrote:
semismart wrote:
Hey, I didn't see Argent, Uriah Heep, Blood sweat and Tears, Iron Butterfly, Rare Earth, Cream, or The Chambers Brothers mentioned. |
I'm trying to talk only about PURE prog rock. Iron Butterfly had their great song, but they're not considered real prog, as far as I know... And have you seen my list? I've got enough to do!
|
Hey no problem. You asked, I answered. You did look a little light in 60s though!
|
I think you're right by mentioning those bands (I love Iron Butterfly and Uriah Heep), but I can't put all of that in my paper (I could fill 20 pages with Yes, Genesis, ELP, VdGG and Gentle Giant only ). Thanks for your help!
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 11 2004 at 06:17
Andyliftuk wrote:
You forgot to mention 'It Bites'!!!....they were defintely an insperation to a lot of prog bands that formed torwards the late eighties/ early nineties.......including Dream Theater. (Jon Petrucci once said that Frank Dunnerey was a very underated guitarist and 'It Bites!' were certainly an underated great Prog band of the eighties).....'It Bites!' most certainly influenced one of my old bands 'Summer Indoors'!! |
Thanks! I'll consider including them as well!
|
Posted By: maani
Date Posted: March 11 2004 at 11:48
Vibrationbaby:
I empathize: between CDs, LPs and cassettes (both rock and jazz), I also have about 1,700-2,000 albums, acquired over some 35 years or so. I was able to amass these because the only three things I spent my money on from 1970 to 1982 (or thereabouts) were albums, concert tix and drugs! (OK, maybe I bought some food sometimes...) My collection actually scares me sometimes: so many choices that I often find myself absolutely paralyzed when I want to listen to something!
Peace.
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 11 2004 at 13:45
I only have 400 CD's (collected in about 4 years) and I already recognize your problem. Many times I just don't know what to play!
|
Posted By: Dan Bobrowski
Date Posted: March 11 2004 at 14:00
Sometimes I just close my eyes and grab one, refusing to look at it until I get in my truck.
I have a very "Anal" brother who listens to his stuff A-Z. Really, he starts from one end of his collection and works through to the opposite end. He'd get p.o.'ed if you distrubed his "ROTATION." Scary...
|
Posted By: Aztech
Date Posted: March 11 2004 at 14:29
Danbo I understand your brothers anal attitude in part because if you have over 100 CDs (I have about 300 CDs.)you sometimes fall in the same patern and listen to certain CDs too often, sometimes forgeting about other CDs, that once you actually listen, say to yourself: Oh yeah that was pretty good why did I not listen to that sooner ; hence the alphabetized system where you systematically listen to all in rotation so as not to neglect any forgotten "pearls". but messing up the rotation a bit is obviously ok and recommended in moderation to suit your mood.I wish I could follow my own advice but I always go by my mood.
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 11 2004 at 14:43
I own a lot of CD's that I just don't want to hear (and they're no pearls!)
|
Posted By: lucas
Date Posted: March 11 2004 at 15:55
Joren wrote:
Hey! Focus is not just 'Classical Rock'
Focus made some of the best progrock there is!!!
|
You say that because they come from your country ! But nonetheless you're right
------------- "Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
Posted By: Dan Bobrowski
Date Posted: March 11 2004 at 16:13
Aztech wrote:
Danbo I understand your brothers anal attitude in part because if you have over 100 CDs (I have about 300 CDs.)you sometimes fall in the same patern and listen to certain CDs too often, sometimes forgeting about other CDs, that once you actually listen, say to yourself: Oh yeah that was pretty good why did I not listen to that sooner ; hence the alphabetized system where you systematically listen to all in rotation so as not to neglect any forgotten "pearls". but messing up the rotation a bit is obviously ok and recommended in moderation to suit your mood.I wish I could follow my own advice but I always go by my mood.
|
I've got over 500, maybe 700? who knows or has the patience to count. I'm a mood guy. Sometimes I'll just listen to Blues for weeks on end, then it's jazz or alternative. Very little country music does NOT make me ppuke and I have no tolerance for rap. Probably my upbringing, I don't know.
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: March 11 2004 at 16:22
Rap sucks! Although I must admit I think license to thrill from the beastie boys is pretty cool!
You've gotta fight!
for your right!
to paaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarty!
maybe I'd better shut up now. Ohw, the ambarassment!
|
|