I  am not for carrying or using contrceptives outside marriage. To be honest, I havent bought or used a condom in my entire 23 years... and yes, I'm still a virgin.. Conservative?? I think I am.

I believe that sex, is  only for married couples (of the oppossite sex)

Now, please, dont get me wrong. I'm not in favor of having premarital sex. And I wouldnt let my son or my daughter carry and/or use contraceptives  out of marriage.

Please keep this clean. No personnal or religious attacks. I just want to know your views.

Thanks!

 

 

Not limited to english girls, there are tons of English boys looking to get laid also  in Ibiza

 

Plenty of youth doing that from every country

 

 

 

 

This is rather an interesting concept, these young girls acting completely depraved on holidays. They are ready to engage in sex (and not just conventional) with almost complete strangers who do not care one bit for them (with the assurance of never seeing them again), but in their hometown, they behave like a saint, and never engage this behaviour with males that could care for them.

 

then they complain about the way males are and not finding nice ones???

 

 

But at least the vast majority use condoms and pills

I have a 16 year old daughter and she is aware of all safe sex messages.

 

You said no religion MM, but I have grave concerns about views of catholic church/condoms & spead of AIDS.

 

kids should be aware of these things, I am still 25 and I am very careful... at least I try to be

why is the NO vote not moving????

and to Nutter, I understand!

I guess its a bit difficult not to mention religion... Just dont hit bellow the belt.

specially the teens of PA

 

I was thinking what to write and then you typed it in for me.

 

This is an interesting discussion.

 

 

 

 

 

Would you do the same thing for your daughter?(if you had one)I mean, would you let her have pills or something ?@ Wizzie

 

 I've been back for a few weeks now. I guess I've just been keeping a low profile. Thanks for the nice words anyway.

 

 

Majestic_Mayhem wrote: Would you do the same thing for your daughter?(if you had one)I mean, would you let her have pills or something ?@ Wizzie

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/BobGreece/?chartstyle=basicrt10">

Yes, I would becuase some men hate using condoms and they don't always carry them. I don't want to force morality on my daughter either, and even If I do that's no garuntee to prevent her from having sex.

 

My parents never give me condoms, so if I'm ever in the situation where I would need one I would hope my female partner has the pill.

 

It's irresponsible to have sex without condoms. You never know what you might catch or transmit.

Exactly. That's why you should make your son uses one!

 

Yes I would say that this is where the Vatican is really not up to their self-claimed level of decency. In order to avoid promiscuity and birth control (for their own use/purpose), they are ready to promote false information.

 

So if condoms do not prevent AIDS, then most people will have sex without the rubber (I mean why bother with that fun killer if it is useless) causing more unwanted pregnancies and birth and even more diseases.

 

This spreading of false info is criminal behaviour.

 

I understand their aim is to promote abstinance (which is a very valid option everyone should have the option of considering or applying) , but this is bloody stupid public relations, undermining even more their credibility.  >> this is the exact result they got from all parties involved including other Christian movement.

 

guess who answered NO

I wish someone would come in and answer NO and explain his/her side

 

 

 

 

Uuuhhh!!..........

 

Sex is meant to please not harm. especially when the two individual appreciate each other.

 

Just thought I'd remind you of this.

 

While I respect your celibacy, it is best to try out sex fairly soon in the relationship, because that is a factor that can intervene (inadequacies, strong distastes , simply bad physical chemistry >> which is possible even when the characterial chemistry is fine) into whether to keep going in that relation.

 

 

Generally nobody is having sex with someone the do not appreciate (outside the prostitution thing) at least quite a bit!!! or else, they are masochists (and THAT my friend is a whole other debate)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

still 1 vote for the abstinence till marriage option.

 

 

I think parents should spend more time trying to explain sex and how it is shouldn't be taken lightly but not avoided instead of trying to sacre them and make it appear as some sort of satantic ritual.

I didnt know youre female untill I read your real (?) name Ma'am!

Differences in opinions and beliefs are healthy. I celebrate it with you.

 

Hoping to meet you soon, yo!

 

Of course when I make these statement, they are general , and certainly not aimed at the few women present on our forums.

 

The last thing I would want is to aleniate them and have this place becoming a male pigsty

 

 

 

 

UUuurrrrggggggghhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!...........

 

Just the thought of an all male place, with dirty clothes hanging all over the plce, last month's dishes still waitong to be done and the stained Penthouse mags

 

 

 

YYYyyyyyyyuuuuuuuuuuuuuucccckkkkkkkkkk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...................

 

 

 

Long live women!!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You said, "While I respect your celibacy, it is best to try out sex fairly soon in the relationship, because that is a factor that can intervene...into whether to keep going in that relatioh[ship]."

 

I used to think that way, until I put that very question to a young woman Christian friend of mine who told me that she was going to wait until she was married before having sex.  When I brought up your point, she said, "You could not be more wrong.  If both of you are willing to build a relationship on the things that really matter - love, mutual respect and admiration, companionship, sharing, compromise, humor, shared likes, and even limitd but loving physical affection - and you do this for a year or two or more, how can the sex be anything but great?  Because the physical chemistry was clearly there to begin with, and even if inadequacies or problems exist, you will know how to work through them, where others will simply give up and walk out."

 

I would add that although economic reasons account for most divorces, it has been estimated that sex is the second most common cause for divorce: because the relationship was built at least partly if not largely (or even primarily) on sex, if and when the sex "goes bad," the relationship will suffer disproportionately, especially if the couple does has not developed the "tools" to work through the problem.

 

Ghost Rider:

 

You said, "I refuse to think that two people...who live together without being married, but loving, respecting and supporting each other, are inferior to those who have had works said over them be a priest or town official."

 

What most people don't realize is that "traditional" marriage - i.e., one that includes a marriage "license" - is really a "legal contract" between three parties: the husband, the wife and the state.  I would agree with you in that regard.  However, as a minister, I will not marry two people who I am not convinced are entering into marriage for the correct reasons, with the proper understanding of what it means to love each other "for richer or for poorer, in sickness and in health, till death do you part."  However, if I am convinced of this after meeting with the couple a few times prior to the wedding, then I will marry them whether or not they choose to get a formal marriage license.  Because for me, obviously, it is far more important that they understand what it means to be married in God's sight than in the state's.

 

Peace.

 

I agree with the fact that sex is only for married couples and of course I wouldn't let my son neither to carry contraceptives.

 

 It certainly has a huge consequence for the children!

 

iof it had not been sincere, I would've mentionned the black plague , the bubonic plague and the religion wars as the worst and most sickening diseases of human history >> those have killed many more than the Spanish flu also.

 

 

Just kidding

 

Peace