how many bars long at least should be a s
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: Music and Musicians Exchange
Forum Description: Talk with and get feedback from other musicians on the site
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=25754
Printed Date: December 02 2024 at 00:35 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: how many bars long at least should be a s
Posted By: pepo
Subject: how many bars long at least should be a s
Date Posted: July 05 2006 at 19:39
My question goes to those who do and don't understand music theory. How many bars or seconds should at least last an instrumental solo to be regarded as such?. And if a solo is composed of long or slow notes or chords is still a solo?. And if it has a counterpoint with another instrument should be called a solo?.
|
Replies:
Posted By: Deadwing12
Date Posted: July 05 2006 at 20:30
From a music theory standpoint, a solo simply stands for anytime only one instrument or part is playing a main melody or theme at one time, usually with countermelodies and rhythm in the background. Thus, all your questions need not have any effect at all on what is needed to define a 'solo.'
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Deadwing008/?chartstyle=Basquiat">
|
Posted By: acheron
Date Posted: July 05 2006 at 20:32
a solo is nothing more than a section of in which one instrument is more prominent, and stands out
chords, single notes, volume swells, crazy effects can all be solo's, and theres no length that makes something a solo
|
Posted By: MajesterX
Date Posted: July 05 2006 at 20:44
It also depends on how fast the solo is. If it's an Yngwie Malmsteen solo it could be a page long and played at 240 BPM, but if if it's a David Gilmour solo it's gonna be to the point and alot slower.
May I ask why you are asking? It might help me know what you asking for a little better.
-------------
|
Posted By: el böthy
Date Posted: July 05 2006 at 20:47
?..."must be"...yeah, I dont agree with does words when it comes to music
------------- "You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
Posted By: Barla
Date Posted: July 05 2006 at 20:49
Well, with long notes, it's still a solo; if you hear one of those Gilmour's fantastic solos.
What do you refer with counterpoint ? (I'm a spanish speaker, so...)
|
Posted By: pepo
Date Posted: July 05 2006 at 20:53
MajesterX wrote:
It also depends on how fast the solo is. If it's an Yngwie Malmsteen solo it could be a page long and played at 240 BPM, but if if it's a David Gilmour solo it's gonna be to the point and alot slower.
May I ask why you are asking? It might help me know what you asking for a little better.
| Well, I just wanted to know people's concept of what a solo is because in a technical way it can be a couple notes (what I thought it was called a bridge) or a whole song. To me a solo was something that should last long enough to have the same importance as the sung part for example. But it seems that I was wrong.
|
Posted By: Ty1020
Date Posted: July 05 2006 at 22:15
I play in a jazz band and solos range anywhere from a couple bars long
to the entire length of a song. As for long notes, well, I've heard
people play solos that consist of them holding a single note over an
entire set of chord changes, so... yeah :P. Deadwing12's definition of
a solo is indeed correct, so that should answer your questions.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Ty1020/">
|
Posted By: pepo
Date Posted: July 05 2006 at 22:34
Barla wrote:
Well, with long notes, it's still a solo; if you hear one of those Gilmour's fantastic solos.
What do you refer with counterpoint ? (I'm a spanish speaker, so...) | counterpoint is contrapunto that's to say two different melodies being played simultaneously.
|
Posted By: pepo
Date Posted: July 05 2006 at 22:36
Ty1020 wrote:
I play in a jazz band and solos range anywhere from a couple bars long to the entire length of a song. As for long notes, well, I've heard people play solos that consist of them holding a single note over an entire set of chord changes, so... yeah :P. Deadwing12's definition of a solo is indeed correct, so that should answer your questions. | Many thanks, it's good to count with the help of pro musicians around.
|
Posted By: Barla
Date Posted: July 08 2006 at 11:29
pepo wrote:
Barla wrote:
Well, with long notes, it's still a solo; if you hear one of those Gilmour's fantastic solos.
What do you refer with counterpoint ? (I'm a spanish speaker, so...) | counterpoint is contrapunto that's to say two different melodies being played simultaneously. |
Ah, contrapunto !! I didn't know the correct translation ...
Well, in that case, IMO, it's not a solo, just two different melodies being played simultaneously.
|
Posted By: dralan
Date Posted: July 08 2006 at 12:47
It all depends on what context the solo is being used in obviously so how can you give a catch-all answer to this question?
|
Posted By: Ghandi 2
Date Posted: July 08 2006 at 12:49
Does it really matter?
------------- "Never forget that the human race with technology is like an alcoholic with a barrel of wine."
Sleepytime Gorilla Museum: Because in their hearts, everyone secretly loves the Unabomber.
|
Posted By: titico
Date Posted: July 10 2006 at 20:58
Well, its good to learn and read this things, Im new here in the forum and I liked this topic so much! For me the most important part of a solo is the creativity that a musician has to create a solo! :)
|
|