Kubrick or Lynch?
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics not related to music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=24760
Printed Date: December 04 2024 at 09:56
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Kubrick or Lynch?
Posted By: Kleynan
Subject: Kubrick or Lynch?
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 05:26
|
So? I've found myself watching their movies alot lately. When I was younger I figured their movies to be merely made by junkies exploring the surreal. It is true: they explore the surreal, but now I know there is usally a hidden message (or many) contained within their movies.
Which director do you prefer?
Stanley Kubrick (Dr. Strangelove, 2001 A Space Odyssey, A Clockwork Orange, The Shining, Full Metal Jacket, Eyes Wide Shut and Barry Lyndon)
David Lynch (Eraserhead, The Elephant Man, Blue Velvet, Lost Highway, Mullholland Drive, tv-series Twin Peaks and Wild at Heart) ------------- 
You've just had a heavy session of electroshock therapy, and you're more relaxed than you've been in weeks. |
Replies:
Posted By: nicoguitar
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 05:33
|
I think that A Space Odyssey of Kubrick is an absolute materpiece... ------------- STATE OF MIND http://www.stateofmind.it - http://www.stateofmind.it - Italian Prog Metal Band |
Posted By: Kleynan
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 05:46
|
"A Space Odyssey" and "Eyes Wide Shut" are Kubricks best in my opinion. -------------
You've just had a heavy session of electroshock therapy, and you're more relaxed than you've been in weeks. |
Posted By: krusty
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 06:16
|
I prefer Lynch overall but I also love Dr. Stranglove and 2001... two great movies. ------------- http://www.humanism.org.uk/site/cms/contentChapterView.asp?chapter=309" rel="nofollow - Humanism |
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 06:58
|
Kubrick easily
I think Lynch is a fake a,d his artsy farsty movies are highly flawed ------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
Posted By: Kleynan
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 07:15
I do not agree. Even Kubrick has stated, that "Eraserhead" by Lynch, is his favorite movie of all time. -------------
You've just had a heavy session of electroshock therapy, and you're more relaxed than you've been in weeks. |
Sean Trane wrote:Posted By: Paul K.
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 15:08
|
Being a big cinema fan, Kubrick easily gets my vote.
After few years of consideration, I've figured that Lynch isn't all that fake, he actually works with archetypes - you may not sure what movie about, but it somehow appeals to you (well, at least to me  ). Sometimes it works, sometimes not.------------- Weasels ripped my flesh |
Posted By: YYZed
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 15:12
|
Space Odyssey is one of the most magnificent and influential pieces of 20th century art. Kubrick easily, and not just for 2001. Most of his other movies are worth seeing.
------------- 
|
Posted By: Rocktopus
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 15:22
|
Unique artists and I love both. Seen all Lynch's (whom I voted for)
films, and still waiting for that complete Twin Peaks DVD release to
happen. Wild at Heart and Barry Lyndon are two great and important
films not mentioned. My two favorites by them are: The Shining (or Dr. Strangelove) and Mulholland Drive (or Eraserhead) ------------- Over land and under ashes In the sunlight, see - it flashes Find a fly and eat his eye But don't believe in me Don't believe in me Don't believe in me |
Posted By: Firepuck
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 15:26
|
singing in the rain...
I voted Kubrick ------------- Kryten : "'Pub'? Ah yes, A meeting place where humans attempt to achieve advanced states of mental incompetence by the repeated consumption of fermented vegetable drinks." |
Posted By: AtLossForWords
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 15:39
|
Chalk up another vote for Kubrick. Clockwork Orange and Eyes Wide Shut were cool films. The Space Odyssey film was ok. -------------  
"Mastodon sucks giant monkey balls." |
Posted By: horza
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 15:41
|
Apart from Spartacus its Lynch for me - close call though. ------------- Originally posted by darkshade: Calling Mike Portnoy a bad drummer is like calling Stephen Hawking an idiot. |
Posted By: TheProgtologist
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 15:42
|
I find all of Kubrick's movies vastly overrated except for A Clockwork Orange and Full Metal Jacket.
I am a Sci-Fi nut..but think 2001 is the most boring movie I have ever seen.Visually stunning,but it just does NOTHING for me. -------------  |
Posted By: Kleynan
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 16:00
Edited it  -------------
You've just had a heavy session of electroshock therapy, and you're more relaxed than you've been in weeks. |
Posted By: Empathy
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 16:06
Another Kubrick lover here!  ------------- Pure Brilliance: 
|
Posted By: cuncuna
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 16:12
|
Both. But I have a preference for Fellini over them. Or mr. Kusturica, who is not prog related or prog folk, by the way. ------------- ¡Beware of the Bee! |
Posted By: Bastille Dude
Date Posted: June 15 2006 at 17:18
|
I love both Kubrick and Lynch, but I have to say I love Kubrick more.
I used to work in a video store when "Eyes wide shut" came out on video, I would ask the customers returning the copy they rented how they liked it, Every single one said they hated it. I always thought that although not perfect or as good as some of Kubrick's classics, it was a very good movie. ------------- DEATH TO FALSE PROG! |
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: June 16 2006 at 06:17
|
Both unique directors, but I think Kubrick has the edge. Too many Lynch projects seem surreal for the sake of it.
Kubricks best = 2001, The Shining, Full Metal Jacket Lynch's best = Dune, Wild at Heart, The Elephant Man ..imo ------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy! |
Posted By: Vompatti
Date Posted: June 16 2006 at 06:57
| I like them almost equally, but Lynch maybe a little bit more. Mulholland Drive and Eraserhead (see avatar) are his best movies, I think. |
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: June 16 2006 at 07:57
Actually I started the opposite girection: I decided that Lynch's cheap style of making movies was due to the lack of finances at first , but as time went on I realized Lynch was all hype and not much substance.
Stylised movies making is one thing (I love Lelouch, even if he makes dud movies, his style is inimtable) , but in Lynch's case he makes B series movies his own private style, even with an a-style budget. His movies are purposely strange with odd characters and uncomplete stories to force the spectator that did not get it all saying that it is their fault for not understanding Lynch's concept. Whereas it should be the opposite, the spectator should say that Lynch is not able to make a correct movie.
Jim Jarmusch's B-style movies are so much better Lynch's ------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
Posted By: OrionCrystalIce
Date Posted: June 16 2006 at 08:06
|
Lynch, even though he's made some crap, he's also made some of my favorite films of all time, most notably Eraserhead, Elephant Man, Dune, Blue Velvet. Kubrick has a hollow ring for me. There always feels like there is a lot of potential in his work, but really, he is sort of a catalyst for what is considered 'artsy' by the general modern crowd, and that stuff is just way too stale and predictable for me..  ------------- black star, white light 
|
Posted By: bhikkhu
Date Posted: June 16 2006 at 09:12
Kubrick is my favorite director, and I don't care for Lynch at all. "The Elephant Man" is the only one I find worth watching (except for "Dune," that's a pretty good comedy  ). Everytime I have given up on him, a friend will tell about one that will change my mind. I watch it, and get frustrated again. There are several movies that I have liked as they built up, only to be ruined in the end (Nicolas Cage's ghost doing an elvis impression, Dean Stockwell, in a halo of light, singing "Blue Velvet," etc.).------------- a.k.a. H.T. http://riekels.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow - http://riekels.wordpress.com |
Posted By: Paul K.
Date Posted: June 16 2006 at 10:56
I was the same opinion few years ago. But as I said he operates with archetypes and do it quite well. Sometimes really, it's weirdness for the sake of weirdness, but not always. Lynch has also a very good cinematography, but Kubrick anyway beats him at it (I just *love* all his tracking shots, use of colours, low cutting, etc...). ------------- Weasels ripped my flesh |
Posted By: Epitath
Date Posted: June 16 2006 at 14:50
|
Personally I prefer Lynch, Mullholland Drive is a Masterpiece in the art of cinema movies.
but to this I must add that I have only seen ONE kubrick movie, being A Clockwork Orange which I did enjoy alot. So im not sure if my opinion will be the same once Ive seen the others, but for now I vote:
Lynch! ------------- 
|
Posted By: fogwalker
Date Posted: June 16 2006 at 15:58
|
Stan is the man.
Lynch isn't bad, but all his films have a kind of samey wierdness about them.
The impressive thing about Kubrick is his range - he has taken on nearly every film genre (horror, classical epic, sci-fi, social commentary, war) and produced masterpieces in each one.
Compared to this, David Lynch's repertoire seems very narrow.
|