Print Page | Close Window

The Odyssey vs Octavarium

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics related to progressive music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17493
Printed Date: February 04 2025 at 15:49
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: The Odyssey vs Octavarium
Posted By: SirPsycho388
Subject: The Odyssey vs Octavarium
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 01:42
Which 24 minute epic is better by these prog metal giants, Dream Theater & Symphony X?

-------------
Strangers passing in the street by chance two separate glances meet and I am you and what I see is me. And do I take you by the hand and lead you through the land and help me understand the best I can



Replies:
Posted By: GoldenSpiral
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 02:27
The Odyssey.  IMO Symphony X provides a more honest (albeit cheesy) approach to the prog metal epic.  DT is great but they arent as original.

-------------
http://www.myspace.com/altaic" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/altaic
ALTAIC

"Oceans Down You'll Lie"
coming soon


Posted By: cold103
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 02:40
I enjoy The Odyssey more.


Posted By: Moatilliatta
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 02:51
Gosh, these are both great songs. The later portions of Octavarium are some of my favorite passages ever, but the first ten or so minutes, while still being good, don't always please me as much as the later half, possibly due to their longevity, with lack of energy. Now, The Odyssey has a brilliant intro, and too has a climatic ending, with some good stuff in between. Hmm, I'm not sure.

-------------
www.last.fm/user/ThisCenotaph


Posted By: Xymphony
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 03:22
The Odyssey, of course...


Posted By: W.Chuck
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 03:58
definitely THE ODYSSEY !

-------------



Posted By: Bj-1
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 08:55
The Odyssey!!!

-------------
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!


Posted By: JayDee
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 09:18
Odyssey this time...

-------------



Posted By: decypher
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 09:26
The Odyssey is ok but like all Symphony X stuff that I have heard so far, typical "symphonic 'progressive'(?) power metal cheese" - I just hate that typical neoclassical thing like "Kings of Terror" (hehe, such a title makes me think they must be swedish!) and a very obvious and shallow kind of "complexity", DT is a different class.


Posted By: JayDee
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 09:29

Originally posted by decypher decypher wrote:

The Odyssey is ok but like all Symphony X stuff that I have heard so far, typical "symphonic 'progressive'(?) power metal cheese" - I just hate that typical neoclassical thing like "Kings of Terror" (hehe, such a title makes me think they must be swedish!) and a very obvious and shallow kind of "complexity", DT is a different class.

Symphony x makes good cheese!, DT has their share of cheese too..

I like both none the less!... and so you voted for DT i guess???



-------------



Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 09:45
The Odyssey!

-------------
https://awesomeprog.com/release-polls/pa/aotm-2025-1/vote" rel="nofollow - 2025 Monthly Release Poll

Listened to:


Posted By: aapatsos
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 09:57
The Odyssey...


Posted By: Xymphony
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 10:07

Originally posted by decypher decypher wrote:

and a very obvious and shallow kind of "complexity", DT is a different class.

 

Oh that's right, Octavarium is much much much much more complex song than The Odyssey.

 

Oh please, don't make me laugh



Posted By: decypher
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 10:15
You can laugh as much as you like, no problem.
For me it's not about complexity (which actually is an advantage for Symphony X, regarding to their very simple song structures around the (mostly very good) instrumental parts - it's the Malmsteen-Thing, boring songs, good solos, next one please - sounded 1985 like it did 1995 and 2005 and will sound the same in 2015). (I do like "Accolade")
Yep I voted for DT (of course), even though they definitely made very cheesy songs in the past, I just think they have much more variety to offer than the neoclassical-lalala-stuff from symphony x, which seems far more limited to me than DT's style.


Posted By: JayDee
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 10:23
Yep, John Petrucci has that jazzy "edge" compared to Mike Romeo.

-------------



Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 10:30

Originally posted by Majestic_Mayhem Majestic_Mayhem wrote:

Yep, John Petrucci has that jazzy "edge" compared to Mike Romeo.

But the edge of Romeo is mich sharper ... he really rocks.

I think that Octavarium is really well composed and contains some stunning parts, great musicianship. The Odyssey is simpler ... but also much more interesting. And the different parts really work in the context of the story, which can't really be said for Octavarium.



-------------
https://awesomeprog.com/release-polls/pa/aotm-2025-1/vote" rel="nofollow - 2025 Monthly Release Poll

Listened to:


Posted By: decypher
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 10:35
Technically Romeo is a good guitarist but I think his sound is very limited, he never surprised me with stuff like Petrucci did on songs like "Take the Time" or "The Glass Prison", he has a much better understanding of using chromatic scales in songs instead of sticking with the minor thing....


Posted By: xjester
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 11:04
Originally posted by Xymphony Xymphony wrote:

Originally posted by decypher decypher wrote:

and a very obvious and shallow kind of "complexity", DT is a different class.

 

Oh that's right, Octavarium is much much much much more complex song than The Odyssey.

 

Oh please, don't make me laugh

Octavarium is Extreamly complex in concept.

This is a page that explains the concept of octavarium. It talks about the whole album, but goes into detail about the song twards the bottom.



Posted By: W.Chuck
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 11:08
Originally posted by decypher decypher wrote:


The Odyssey is ok but like all Symphony X stuff that I have heard so far, typical "symphonic 'progressive'(?) power metal cheese" - I just hate that typical neoclassical thing like "Kings of Terror" (hehe, such a title makes me think they must be swedish!) and a very obvious and shallow kind of "complexity", DT is a different class.


The story behind King of Terrors is far away from any cheese...




Originally posted by Majestic_Mayhem Majestic_Mayhem wrote:

Yep, John Petrucci has that jazzy "edge" compared to Mike Romeo.


I think Michael Pinnella balances that!




Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:


I think that Octavarium is really well composed and contains some stunning parts, great musicianship. The Odyssey is simpler ... but also much more interesting. And the different parts really work in the context of the story, which can't really be said for Octavarium.



Of course The Odyssey has simple parts, but there are also complex pieces and at the end the result counts.



-------------



Posted By: Ed_The_Dead
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 11:47

Octavarium, although both Songs are FAR form being masterpieces... Actually far from being great songs...

There should be a poll bout the real masterpieces:

A Change of Seasons vs The Divine Wings of Tragedy



-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/ed_the_dead/?chartstyle=asimpleblue5">


Posted By: Xymphony
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 12:00

Totally agreed...

Yet, The Odyssey is in fact a very quality song, however i have some problems with that album, mostly about sound (esp. drum). I can not get into some songs, though their composition and performing is splendid...



Posted By: AtLossForWords
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 14:30

Originally posted by decypher decypher wrote:

You can laugh as much as you like, no problem.
For me it's not about complexity (which actually is an advantage for Symphony X, regarding to their very simple song structures around the (mostly very good) instrumental parts - it's the Malmsteen-Thing, boring songs, good solos, next one please - sounded 1985 like it did 1995 and 2005 and will sound the same in 2015). (I do like "Accolade")
Yep I voted for DT (of course), even though they definitely made very cheesy songs in the past, I just think they have much more variety to offer than the neoclassical-lalala-stuff from symphony x, which seems far more limited to me than DT's style.

I agree with most everything you said.  Symphony X lacks variation.  Octavarium is a wonderfully composed song.  The piece is always building and has a lot more character to it than The Odyssey does.  I see Octavarium as a much more passionate piece because it's a song that is an invention all to Dream Theater.  I don't see much passion with Symphony X basically narrating a Homer Poem.  That's like Iced Earth being passionate over a comic book.

The complexity of Octavarium is far beyond that of The Odyssey.  With Octavarium we have excellent chromatic and modal passages.  With Octavarium we have more time signatures and hemiolas. With Octavarium we have a more variant song structure.  With The Odyssey, we don't really have any of that. 

I also agree with Ed.  A Change of Seasons vs. Divine Wings of Tragedy.  (As usuall I'd vote for Dream Theater.)



-------------

"Mastodon sucks giant monkey balls."


Posted By: Drew
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 14:36
The Odyssey

-------------





Posted By: troy
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 14:51

I think Dream Theater is a more talented band, but i have to go with the Odesey as being the better epic. 



-------------
SUNSET IS AN ANGEL WEEPING
HOLDING OUT A BLOODY SWORD
NO MATTER HOW I SQUINT I CANNOT MAKE OUT WHAT IT IS POINTING TOWARD


Posted By: W.Chuck
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 16:33
The Odyssey is a much more variant and innovative song.
The relation between lyrics vocals and music is much more stunning. And there is the same number of time signatures in both songs... furthermore it's more important how often they change! The rhythm section (guitar and drums) of the Odyssey is more complex and diverse.
But I agree the story of Octavarium is much deeper and original!

-------------



Posted By: AtLossForWords
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 16:42

Quote The Odyssey is a much more variant and innovative song.

Quote The rhythm section (guitar and drums) of the Odyssey is more complex and diverse.

That's a joke too.  John Myung is exponentially better than Mike LePond.  LePond is a straight rythymn bass player.  The only melodic line he has is the the tapping part of Egypt back on V.  LePond's bass lines add nothing to the music of Symphony X.  John Myung on the other hand plays parts that are reasonably separate from Petrucci's guitar line.  Myung uses much more of his bass and plays much more melodic lines.  The unison part in the insturmental section of Octavarium alone is enough to show the bass playing in Octavarium is exponentially better than the bass playing in The Odyssey.

Do you really want to compare Mike Portnoy to Jason Rullo?  Rullo inevitably uses a four on the floor beat with his bass drum.  Rullo isn't variant.  He may be underrated by some, but to say that his work is more complex and diverse than Portnoy's is rubbish.  Portnoy has consistently shown the ability to throw fills in unconventional spots in songs.  Portnoy is a master at creating different solos.  I don't even really catch Rullo's solos, but Portnoy never fails to create a solo that surprises the listener.



-------------

"Mastodon sucks giant monkey balls."


Posted By: King of Loss
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 16:42

Octavarium, because I usually vote for Dream Theater over Symphony X!

Nah, Jus' Kiddin'. I really like Octavarium over the title track, the Odyssey. You know why? Despite the lack of originality and the lack of proper melody, I still find the overall epic to more better and more creative than the Odyssey. The usage of the Pink Floyd entrance, Genesis-like phrases, along with more melodic Dream Theater riffs (As compared to harsh Michael Romeo chug-chug riffs ), more melodic singing by Labrie (Even though I find Russell Allen's voice to better on this song that on the entire Odyssey album, I which I must say was not a good one ).

Overall, despite the lack of originality, Dream Theater pulls off this epic very well, it is among my favorite songs of 2005 because of that.

Also here, we are comparing different styles. As mentioned before, Symphony X is a Neo-Classically influenced band with a lot of Neo-Classical Symphonic sections, the beginning of the epic sounds like Lord of the Rings soundtrack music! While, on the other hand, even though Dream Theater on this song uses strings and a small symphony, they still manage to sound like Dream Theater, which is the more Jazzier style as compared to Neo-Classical Metal.

I wouldn't want to vote in this poll as it is to compare styles, but I see Dream Theater desperately needs help!



Posted By: W.Chuck
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 16:56
Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:

Quote The Odyssey is a much more variant and innovative song.


[IMG]style="WIDTH: 397px; HEIGHT: 245px" height=119 src="smileys/smiley36.gif" width=17>


Quote The rhythm section (guitar and drums) of the Odyssey is more complex and diverse.


That's a joke too.  John Myung is exponentially better than Mike LePond.  LePond is a straight rythymn bass player.  The only melodic line he has is the the tapping part of Egypt back on V.  LePond's bass lines add nothing to the music of Symphony X.  John Myung on the other hand plays parts that are reasonably separate from Petrucci's guitar line.  Myung uses much more of his bass and plays much more melodic lines.  The unison part in the insturmental section of Octavarium alone is enough to show the bass playing in Octavarium is exponentially better than the bass playing in The Odyssey.




omg, that's so sad...
Can't you even read? I've extra written (GUITAR AND DRUMS)... I wouldn't have written that if I would have meant the bass too... PLEASE read a text carefully before making a mock of you...


Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:


Do you really want to compare Mike Portnoy to Jason Rullo? Rullo inevitably uses a four on the floor beat with his bass drum. Rullo isn't variant. He may be underrated by some, but to say that his work is more complex and diverse than Portnoy's is rubbish. Portnoy has consistently shown the ability to throw fills in unconventional spots in songs. Portnoy is a master at creating different solos. I don't even really catch Rullo's solos, but Portnoy never fails to create a solo that surprises the listener.


same here...
I talked about THE ODYSSEY!!!!!!...
NOT about both of them in general!!!...in general Mike Portnoy is much better, but in the Odyssey Jason Rullo is simply amazing, just listen to the song carefully in a bass mode and listen carefully to the drums!

I don't know what's wrong with you? Are you ignoring some words to show off in your answer how bad Symphony X and how great Dream Theater is, like you always do, when there is any opportunity?

-------------



Posted By: AtLossForWords
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 17:08
Originally posted by W.Chuck W.Chuck wrote:

Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:

Quote The Odyssey is a much more variant and innovative song.


[IMG]style="WIDTH: 397px; HEIGHT: 245px" height=119 src="smileys/smiley36.gif" width=17>


Quote The rhythm section (guitar and drums) of the Odyssey is more complex and diverse.


That's a joke too.  John Myung is exponentially better than Mike LePond.  LePond is a straight rythymn bass player.  The only melodic line he has is the the tapping part of Egypt back on V.  LePond's bass lines add nothing to the music of Symphony X.  John Myung on the other hand plays parts that are reasonably separate from Petrucci's guitar line.  Myung uses much more of his bass and plays much more melodic lines.  The unison part in the insturmental section of Octavarium alone is enough to show the bass playing in Octavarium is exponentially better than the bass playing in The Odyssey.




omg, that's so sad...
Can't you even read? I've extra written (GUITAR AND DRUMS)... I wouldn't have written that if I would have meant the bass too... PLEASE read a text carefully before making a mock of you...


Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:


Do you really want to compare Mike Portnoy to Jason Rullo? Rullo inevitably uses a four on the floor beat with his bass drum. Rullo isn't variant. He may be underrated by some, but to say that his work is more complex and diverse than Portnoy's is rubbish. Portnoy has consistently shown the ability to throw fills in unconventional spots in songs. Portnoy is a master at creating different solos. I don't even really catch Rullo's solos, but Portnoy never fails to create a solo that surprises the listener.


same here...
I talked about THE ODYSSEY!!!!!!...
NOT about both of them in general!!!...in general Mike Portnoy is much better, but in the Odyssey Jason Rullo is simply amazing, just listen to the song carefully in a bass mode and listen carefully to the drums!

I don't know what's wrong with you? Are you ignoring some words to show off in your answer how bad Symphony X and how great Dream Theater is, like you always do, when there is any opportunity?

So in your musical world, a rythymn section is made up of guitars and drums, not bass and drums?  I'm sorry, but when there is a discussion over a rock/metal band, and I hear someone mention rythymn section, I think bass and drums.  Why, because that's a what a rythymn section is.

So Rullo is selectively better than Mike Portnoy?  Did Mike Portnoy just decide not to be as skillfull in the song Octavarium?  If Mike Portnoy is better than Rullo, why wouldn't that be evident when two songs are of comparable quality are being compared?  Maybe if it's The Odyssey vs. You Not Me, I could understand that.  This is Octavarium vs. The Odyssey, I think it's fair to compare these drum parts by technique.



-------------

"Mastodon sucks giant monkey balls."


Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 17:12
^ a prog metal epic is not a bass clinic performance.

-------------
https://awesomeprog.com/release-polls/pa/aotm-2025-1/vote" rel="nofollow - 2025 Monthly Release Poll

Listened to:


Posted By: Xymphony
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 17:20
I don't agree Portnoy being better than Rullo. He plays with more flexibility and smoothness, however; they have really very different styles. I see most Portnoy did on some jazz drummers, yet I find Rullo more creative. But they really have almost nothing to compare, and do not forget, Rullo never showed off his drumming talents except 2 or 3 songs all his career...


Posted By: W.Chuck
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 17:20
Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:

Originally posted by W.Chuck W.Chuck wrote:

Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:


Quote The Odyssey is a much more variant and innovative song.


[IMG]style="WIDTH: 397px; HEIGHT: 245px" height=119 src="smileys/smiley36.gif" width=17>


Quote The rhythm section (guitar and drums) of the Odyssey is more complex and diverse.


That's a joke too.  John Myung is exponentially better than Mike LePond.  LePond is a straight rythymn bass player.  The only melodic line he has is the the tapping part of Egypt back on V.  LePond's bass lines add nothing to the music of Symphony X.  John Myung on the other hand plays parts that are reasonably separate from Petrucci's guitar line.  Myung uses much more of his bass and plays much more melodic lines.  The unison part in the insturmental section of Octavarium alone is enough to show the bass playing in Octavarium is exponentially better than the bass playing in The Odyssey.


omg, that's so sad... Can't you even read? I've extra written (GUITAR AND DRUMS)... I wouldn't have written that if I would have meant the bass too... PLEASE read a text carefully before making a mock of you...
Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:

Do you really want to compare Mike Portnoy to Jason Rullo? Rullo inevitably uses a four on the floor beat with his bass drum. Rullo isn't variant. He may be underrated by some, but to say that his work is more complex and diverse than Portnoy's is rubbish. Portnoy has consistently shown the ability to throw fills in unconventional spots in songs. Portnoy is a master at creating different solos. I don't even really catch Rullo's solos, but Portnoy never fails to create a solo that surprises the listener.
same here... I talked about THE ODYSSEY!!!!!!... NOT about both of them in general!!!...in general Mike Portnoy is much better, but in the Odyssey Jason Rullo is simply amazing, just listen to the song carefully in a bass mode and listen carefully to the drums! I don't know what's wrong with you? Are you ignoring some words to show off in your answer how bad Symphony X and how great Dream Theater is, like you always do, when there is any opportunity?


So in your musical world, a rythymn section is made up of guitars and drums, not bass and drums?  I'm sorry, but when there is a discussion over a rock/metal band, and I hear someone mention rythymn section, I think bass and drums.  Why, because that's a what a rythymn section is.




Oh damn...I KNOW THAT AND THAT'S WHY I WROTE (GUITAR AND DRUMS) EXACTLY BEHIND IT...

Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:


So Rullo is selectively better than Mike Portnoy?  Did Mike Portnoy just decide not to be as skillfull in the song Octavarium?  If Mike Portnoy is better than Rullo, why wouldn't that be evident when two songs are of comparable quality are being compared?  Maybe if it's The Odyssey vs. You Not Me, I could understand that.  This is Octavarium vs. The Odyssey, I think it's fair to compare these drum parts by technique.



are you serious? Of course he is as skillfull, but the achievement counts and not what he would be able to do otherwise...
And your last part is totally senseless
I compare both songs by technique, what the drums do.
And if Rullo does a better job, he's better in that song.
In general (symphony X vs Dream Theater) Mike Portnoy would definitely win, but this time we just compare 2 songs, nothing else just those 2 songs and only that what happens in those 2 songs counts, nothing else!

-------------



Posted By: troy
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 17:23
Originally posted by troy troy wrote:

I think Dream Theater is a more talented band, but i have to go with the Odesey as being the better epic. 

OuchBlack-eye for my typing editing skills. I really can spell!   l 

-------------
SUNSET IS AN ANGEL WEEPING
HOLDING OUT A BLOODY SWORD
NO MATTER HOW I SQUINT I CANNOT MAKE OUT WHAT IT IS POINTING TOWARD


Posted By: AtLossForWords
Date Posted: January 16 2006 at 18:08
Originally posted by W.Chuck W.Chuck wrote:

Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:

Originally posted by W.Chuck W.Chuck wrote:

Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:


Quote The Odyssey is a much more variant and innovative song.


[IMG]style="WIDTH: 397px; HEIGHT: 245px" height=119 src="smileys/smiley36.gif" width=17>


Quote The rhythm section (guitar and drums) of the Odyssey is more complex and diverse.


That's a joke too.  John Myung is exponentially better than Mike LePond.  LePond is a straight rythymn bass player.  The only melodic line he has is the the tapping part of Egypt back on V.  LePond's bass lines add nothing to the music of Symphony X.  John Myung on the other hand plays parts that are reasonably separate from Petrucci's guitar line.  Myung uses much more of his bass and plays much more melodic lines.  The unison part in the insturmental section of Octavarium alone is enough to show the bass playing in Octavarium is exponentially better than the bass playing in The Odyssey.


omg, that's so sad... Can't you even read? I've extra written (GUITAR AND DRUMS)... I wouldn't have written that if I would have meant the bass too... PLEASE read a text carefully before making a mock of you...
Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:

Do you really want to compare Mike Portnoy to Jason Rullo? Rullo inevitably uses a four on the floor beat with his bass drum. Rullo isn't variant. He may be underrated by some, but to say that his work is more complex and diverse than Portnoy's is rubbish. Portnoy has consistently shown the ability to throw fills in unconventional spots in songs. Portnoy is a master at creating different solos. I don't even really catch Rullo's solos, but Portnoy never fails to create a solo that surprises the listener.
same here... I talked about THE ODYSSEY!!!!!!... NOT about both of them in general!!!...in general Mike Portnoy is much better, but in the Odyssey Jason Rullo is simply amazing, just listen to the song carefully in a bass mode and listen carefully to the drums! I don't know what's wrong with you? Are you ignoring some words to show off in your answer how bad Symphony X and how great Dream Theater is, like you always do, when there is any opportunity?


So in your musical world, a rythymn section is made up of guitars and drums, not bass and drums?  I'm sorry, but when there is a discussion over a rock/metal band, and I hear someone mention rythymn section, I think bass and drums.  Why, because that's a what a rythymn section is.




Oh damn...I KNOW THAT AND THAT'S WHY I WROTE (GUITAR AND DRUMS) EXACTLY BEHIND IT...

Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:


So Rullo is selectively better than Mike Portnoy?  Did Mike Portnoy just decide not to be as skillfull in the song Octavarium?  If Mike Portnoy is better than Rullo, why wouldn't that be evident when two songs are of comparable quality are being compared?  Maybe if it's The Odyssey vs. You Not Me, I could understand that.  This is Octavarium vs. The Odyssey, I think it's fair to compare these drum parts by technique.



are you serious? Of course he is as skillfull, but the achievement counts and not what he would be able to do otherwise...
And your last part is totally senseless
I compare both songs by technique, what the drums do.
And if Rullo does a better job, he's better in that song.
In general (symphony X vs Dream Theater) Mike Portnoy would definitely win, but this time we just compare 2 songs, nothing else just those 2 songs and only that what happens in those 2 songs counts, nothing else!

If you know that a rythymn section in metal/rock is bass and drums, WHY DO YOU CALL A RYTHYMN SECTION GUITAR AND DRUMS?

It's not much of a rythymn section is there isn't bassist.

I think Mike Portnoy wins in this case too.  Does Rullo do anything as delicate in The Odyssey as Portnoy does at the beginning of Octavarium most specifically the second movement of the song.  Does he do anything as complex as the instrumental section following the third movement?



-------------

"Mastodon sucks giant monkey balls."


Posted By: W.Chuck
Date Posted: January 17 2006 at 03:32
LISTEN VERY CAREFULLY (BASS MODE) TO THE ODYSSEY AND THE DRUMS. THE SOUND IS VERY QUIET AND MOST OF THE THINGS RULLO PLAYS YOU CANT HEAR, THERE IS MUCH MORE!
AND OF COURSE A RHYTHM SECTION IS BASS GUITAR AND DRUMS BUT I DIDN'T WANTED TO INCLUDE THE BASS CAUSE IT IS NOTHING AMAZING. BUT...AS IT SEEMS YOU ARE A BIT FUSSY AND SO :

CHANGE RHYTHM SECTION TO RHYTHM INSTRUMENTS!

-------------



Posted By: Sean2989
Date Posted: January 20 2006 at 02:02

Ya well im gonna agree with the other guy the bass and drums are the the rhythm section. and as far as Rullo having a better performance than Portnoy not a chance in hell !

[IMG]style="WIDTH: 397px; HEIGHT: 245px" height=119 src="smileys/smiley36.gif" width=17>

  Octavarium gets my vote, hell it much more of a complex and powerful piece of music!



-------------
http://my.opera.com/YtseJam/homes/albums/12552/thumbs/Dream% 20Ball.jpg_thumb.jpg


Posted By: ambriz
Date Posted: January 22 2006 at 21:16
DT is my favorite band. My vote got for "The Odyssey", however. It is more original than Octavarium.

-------------
Progressive music, a kind of life.


Posted By: Gentle Tull
Date Posted: January 22 2006 at 21:42
Octavarium is a great song, however The Odyssey is my favorite metal song, so my vote goes to the Odyssey.

-------------


Posted By: Thufir Hawat
Date Posted: January 23 2006 at 00:31

The Odyssey is far better than Octovarium

And it does justice to Homer’s poem.



-------------
"I can't see through my eye lids"


Posted By: Spacemac
Date Posted: January 24 2006 at 14:16
Octavarium


Posted By: horza
Date Posted: January 24 2006 at 15:30
The Odyssey - of course

-------------
Originally posted by darkshade:

Calling Mike Portnoy a bad drummer is like calling Stephen Hawking an idiot.


Posted By: #1floydfan
Date Posted: January 24 2006 at 19:29
don't get me wrong i love the odyssey but octivarium is just better there is no other way to epxplain it (close though very close)

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/jimbobismykitty/?chartstyle=basicrt10 - [IMG - http://imagegen.last.fm/basicrt10/recenttracks/jimbobismykitty.gif -


Posted By: DT_bast
Date Posted: February 07 2006 at 21:19
Originally posted by Ed_The_Dead Ed_The_Dead wrote:

There should be a poll bout the real masterpieces:

A Change of Seasons vs The Divine Wings of Tragedy



Now you're talking, but I do think that Octavarium and The Odyssey are great songs.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk