Print Page | Close Window

Scott Walker or Tim Buckley?

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics related to progressive music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=134063
Printed Date: February 21 2025 at 10:53
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Scott Walker or Tim Buckley?
Posted By: Heart of the Matter
Subject: Scott Walker or Tim Buckley?
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 05:21
Two wonderful voices I enjoy equally (although in different moments, that's true).
Let's see your opinions, favorite songs, other candidates in the same range (if any), and, you know, whatever!








Replies:
Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 05:22
Love both.


Posted By: Psychedelic Paul
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 05:26
Scott Walker for his earlier albums and Tim Buckley for his later albums after Lorca & Starsailor, so I'll vote Both. Smile


Posted By: Heart of the Matter
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 05:35
^ That's so precise! Thank you


Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 05:41
I've listened a lot more to Scott than Tim in my life, but I've also known about the former artist longer than the latter. Both are great and deserving, so Both from me as well.


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 05:43
For more precision on my part, I love Scott Walker for his 1967 to 1969 period (one through four albums) as well as the later albums, Tilt (1995), The Drift (2006) and Bish Bosch (2012). As for Tim Buckley, I love his six albums from 1966 to 1970.


Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 06:02
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

For more precision on my part, I love Scott Walker for his 1967 to 1969 period (one through four albums) as well as the later albums, Tilt (1995), The Drift (2006) and Bish Bosch (2012). As for Tim Buckley, I love his six albums from 1966 to 1970.


never really understood the SW hoopla, but Buckley was phenomal from Happy Sad to Greetings From LA. I must say that his last two albums are very disappointing (read my reviews)

Lorca is his  his apex, though I must say that the non-prog crowd will prefer Starsailor.


-------------
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword


Posted By: Manuel
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 06:11
Both equally. As mentioned before, they're quite different, but both are quite powerful.




Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 06:12
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

For more precision on my part, I love Scott Walker for his 1967 to 1969 period (one through four albums) as well as the later albums, Tilt (1995), The Drift (2006) and Bish Bosch (2012). As for Tim Buckley, I love his six albums from 1966 to 1970.


never really understood the SW hoopla, but Buckley was phenomal from Happy Sad to Greetings From LA. I must say that his last two albums are very disappointing (read my reviews)

Lorca is his  his apex, though I must say that the non-prog crowd will prefer Starsailor.


Lorca would be my pick too. I would expect Starsailor to be the general favourite amongst the members of Prog Archives, maybe followed by Happy Sad.

I think Scott Walker is remarkable both for his singer-songwriter baroque pop and experimental, post-industrial work.


Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 06:14
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

For more precision on my part, I love Scott Walker for his 1967 to 1969 period (one through four albums) as well as the later albums, Tilt (1995), The Drift (2006) and Bish Bosch (2012). As for Tim Buckley, I love his six albums from 1966 to 1970.
Btw: have you ever given Till the Band Comes In and The Moviegoer a listen? I'm asking because I've never bothered myself - until last year. Especially the first of the two is better than it's reputation imo. A bit of a step down compared with 3 and 4 for sure (which I think of as stronger albums than 1 & 2), but it's highlights will please any Scott-fan I think. I haven't gotten around to listen my way through the rest of his "wilderness years" yet.

My first ever Scott Walker album was actually his 1984 release Climate of the Hunter - which I just bought on a whim liking the cover and its title. I think its a mostly great album with some questionable 1980's production and arrangement choices. I also remember how strange I thought Tilt was when it came out. Now I think it's beautiful and quite touching.


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 06:24
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

For more precision on my part, I love Scott Walker for his 1967 to 1969 period (one through four albums) as well as the later albums, Tilt (1995), The Drift (2006) and Bish Bosch (2012). As for Tim Buckley, I love his six albums from 1966 to 1970.
Btw: have you ever given Till the Band Comes In and The Moviegoer a listen? I'm asking because I've never bothered myself - until last year. Especially the first of the two is better than it's reputation imo. A bit of a step down compared with 3 and 4 for sure (which I think of as stronger albums than 1 & 2), but it's highlights will please any Scott-fan I think. I haven't gotten around to listen my way through the rest of his "wilderness years" yet.

My first ever Scott Walker album was actually his 1984 release Climate of the Hunter - which I just bought on a whim liking the cover and its title. I think its a mostly great album with some questionable 1980's production and arrangement choices. I also remember how strange I thought Tilt was when it came out. Now I think it's beautiful and quite touching.


I'd heard the title track of 'Til the Band Comes In at least, which is in the opening post, before and I really like that. I have not heard The Moviegoer at all yet, that I can recall. I will check those out. The ones I mentioned are the only albums of his and of Buckley that I have heard in full.


Posted By: Nogbad_The_Bad
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 06:38
Going with Both

-------------
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/


Posted By: Heart of the Matter
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 07:00
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

For more precision on my part, I love Scott Walker for his 1967 to 1969 period (one through four albums) as well as the later albums, Tilt (1995), The Drift (2006) and Bish Bosch (2012). As for Tim Buckley, I love his six albums from 1966 to 1970.
Btw: have you ever given Till the Band Comes In and The Moviegoer a listen? I'm asking because I've never bothered myself - until last year. Especially the first of the two is better than it's reputation imo. A bit of a step down compared with 3 and 4 for sure (which I think of as stronger albums than 1 & 2), but it's highlights will please any Scott-fan I think. I haven't gotten around to listen my way through the rest of his "wilderness years" yet.

My first ever Scott Walker album was actually his 1984 release Climate of the Hunter - which I just bought on a whim liking the cover and its title. I think its a mostly great album with some questionable 1980's production and arrangement choices. I also remember how strange I thought Tilt was when it came out. Now I think it's beautiful and quite touching.


I'd heard the title track of 'Til the Band Comes In at least, which is in the opening post, before and I really like that. I have not heard The Moviegoer at all yet, that I can recall. I will check those out. The ones I mentioned are the only albums of his and of Buckley that I have heard in full.


I remember 'Til The Band Comes In from long lost radio days (that and The Sun Ain't Gonna Shine Anymore), when I was wishing they play it again soon, even before I knew who the singer was.


Posted By: progaardvark
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 11:07
Scott. Hence went and cracked an atom age old egg beneath my nose.

-------------
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag
that's a happy bag of lettuce
this car smells like cartilage
nothing beats a good video about fractions


Posted By: omphaloskepsis
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 14:16
Scott.  There's more to love. I adore Tim, but not a peep after the tender age of 28.  Sad...


Posted By: jamesbaldwin
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 14:25
Well, as somebody knows, I love Tim Buckley.

For me there is no possible comparison.


-------------
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.


Posted By: Mellotron Storm
Date Posted: December 15 2024 at 20:20
I picked none, but I have heard little of either. Enough though not to pursue further with both of these singer/songwriters. .

-------------
"The wind is slowly tearing her apart"

"Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN


Posted By: Heart of the Matter
Date Posted: December 16 2024 at 06:21
^ TBH, Scott had a crooning style that may sound dated (though no less adorable), and Tim used to push his (fantastic) voice too much away at times, but, hey, nobody's perfect! To me, both are a pleasure to listen.


Posted By: Criswell
Date Posted: December 16 2024 at 07:25
The only serious moment ever on The Monkeys TV show was Tim Buckley singing Song to the Siren, and it was breathtaking...


Posted By: Octopus II
Date Posted: December 16 2024 at 07:31
Both Smile



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk