Print Page | Close Window

Pinocchio (1940) vs Fantasia (1940)

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics not related to music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=128379
Printed Date: November 22 2024 at 03:32
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Pinocchio (1940) vs Fantasia (1940)
Posted By: Icarium
Subject: Pinocchio (1940) vs Fantasia (1940)
Date Posted: February 03 2022 at 16:06
Two films of imensive fame and impact the seccond and third full length movie by Disney animated Studio.

Fantasia blends live action, animation and classical music in a wonderfull piece of art.

Pinocchio is the most complex animated movie Disney have made of its time in any time.

These two movies are of such pedigree and level, its dizzying. Pinocchio is among my most favourite pieces of art ever so im sligtly biassed on that movies magic, but it is also highly regarded as a very complex animated movie. Fantasia is of a league and concept that is so ahead of its time.

There are tropes in both films you forgett are from these films that are in resent media. Jimmimy Cricket is the best sidkick ever.






-------------



Replies:
Posted By: Man With Hat
Date Posted: February 03 2022 at 16:46
Fantasia 

-------------
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.


Posted By: dwill123
Date Posted: February 04 2022 at 05:37
Pinocchio, classic Disney.


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: February 04 2022 at 08:46
Hi,

FANTASIA is the more important of the two, although it is not exactly a film for the kiddies, as the music is the story, not anything else, but the cartoons are excellent.

Pinocchio is a fantasy story taken from the original ... and what Walt Disney did, to many other stories as well, was change them to a fairy tale, that was supposed to get the kids to behave ... when the originals were more about the social and philosophical times when they were first created, and their meanings were much more intelligent and pointed than the soda pop mentality that Mr. Disney used.

BY THE WAY ... the recent film about Pinocchio with Robert Benigni is fantastic and very with it and worth seeing. It was made in 2020. It is much more "faithful" to the original than the cardboard version used by Walt Disney, which DID HAVE some neat cartoon stuff, and helped the life of cartoons develop, but then FANTASIA did not come around and be appreciated until way later by the audiences, more like 10 plus years later, though both films date 1940. And that tells you how much folks did not exactly like the detailed interpretation of the music by the cartoons. Something that a lot of classical music studies did not like either, since it "interfered" with the real stories of the music! The idea of the music being associated with cartoons might make serious music listeners think that it was not a good idea!

(Side note)  (My dad, reviewed it and had it cut up by the Portuguese Censors, but he was a classic music fan and then some -- hundreds of poems to so much music) ... but when I asked what he though ... "it was very nice" ... and went back to his work. Which was his nice way of saying ... not a big deal or worth discussing!)

There is, also, another Italian film "ALLEGRO NON TROPPO" that is a lot of fun to watch and it is along the lines of Fantasia, although it kinda ends with a rather strange thing on Ravel's Bolero, but still fun to watch as the music and the cartoon interweave so well in its "march"! It has some outstanding things, and the Dvorak one will have you in tears laughing! And a couple of the pieces, the old man one, and then the kitty cat one ... are just ... far out there ... way better and more interesting than what Walt Disney ever did.

Pinocchio (2020 Italy)
Directed by Matteo Garrone
Screenplay by Matteo Garrone and Massimo Ceccherini
Based on the novel by Carlo Collodi (around 1883)
Cinematography by Nicolaj Bruel
Music by Dario Marianelli
With Roberto Benigni (Gepetto), Federico Ielapi (Pinocchio), Rocco Papaleo (Cat), Massimo Ceccherini (Fox), Marine Vacth (Fairy), Gigi Proietti (Mangiafuoco)




-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: February 04 2022 at 17:17
From an animation standpoint, Pinocchio is the greater of the two. Everything, from the water scenes based on Japanese woodcuts to the vast and beautiful perspective shots to the effects animation to the minute detail of the woodwork in Geppetto's shop is groundbreaking (even to the point where model-makers built working models of the elaborate cuckoo clocks). It is the apex of Disney animation and is probably their greatest single production. 

Fantasia is hit and miss, animation-wise. It is very ambitious, but the episodic nature of the segments rob it of continuity, and some segments are brilliant while others are pedestrian. The revelation here is the sound production and not so much the animation.


-------------
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: February 06 2022 at 21:31
Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

From an animation standpoint, Pinocchio is the greater of the two. Everything, from the water scenes based on Japanese woodcuts to the vast and beautiful perspective shots to the effects animation to the minute detail of the woodwork in Geppetto's shop is groundbreaking (even to the point where model-makers built working models of the elaborate cuckoo clocks). It is the apex of Disney animation and is probably their greatest single production. 

Fantasia is hit and miss, animation-wise. It is very ambitious, but the episodic nature of the segments rob it of continuity, and some segments are brilliant while others are pedestrian. The revelation here is the sound production and not so much the animation.

Hi,

I was thinking that both were valuable and important, since almost all cartoons were not that "fast" and still used the stop/pic/stop/pic process which Warner Bros went on to just obliterate. But many of the cartoonists came from Disney, and those two films showed a freedom of expression and design ability that was very neat and enjoyable. I would agree it is the best of WD's animation projects, and likely the standard level for many years to come.

The weird/funny thing is that WD let go of "music" and WB became known for it, even though we don't discuss it. Try listening to Carl Stalling without the visual ... but you can do the cartoon without the music, since you can imagine the sound effects, though not the music! But the music, makes a lot of modern music sound bad, and makes Faust sound like a kid goofing around and laughing at it when he/she is 2!


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: February 07 2022 at 15:24
"When you wish upon A Star" might seem childish, but is very poignant, one of the best songs of the century. A very meaningfull song, and a jazz standard to boot. A grand overture.

-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk