Mickey Rourke or Steven Seagal
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics not related to music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=127413
Printed Date: November 25 2024 at 04:28
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Mickey Rourke or Steven Seagal
Posted By: Icarium
Subject: Mickey Rourke or Steven Seagal
Date Posted: October 01 2021 at 01:09
|
Two excentric macho actors but whom is the most delicate at acting? Both are fighters, boxing and aikido. Both are also right-wingers, but that is not important factor for the poll -------------  
|
Replies:
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: October 01 2021 at 01:34
|
Rourke for Barfly alone. Steven Segal... really? ------------- "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy |
Posted By: Man With Hat
Date Posted: October 01 2021 at 01:45
|
I guess Mickey ------------- Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
Posted By: Shadowyzard
Date Posted: October 01 2021 at 03:02
| Rourke. |
Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: October 01 2021 at 03:32
|
I was aimaing at the contrast and the illusion of physique vs technique vs finesse. While both Rourke and Seagal both deploy physiche and technique and finesse, Rourke also have the Finesse of a trained method actor with good phsyiche. Though i get entertained by the most praised Seagal films he got many more stinker. Rourke is able to do most roles and most genres, from drama to action. Sometimes don't judge the book by the cover. And Mickey id an interesting book. -------------
|
Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: October 01 2021 at 03:36
| I doubt that Seagal has ever been employed for the finesse of his acting, it's usually because he can beat the**** out of people. |
Posted By: suitkees
Date Posted: October 01 2021 at 05:03
|
Mickey Rourke, was it only for Rumble Fish (but he had some other very decent roles). I always considered Steven Seagal as a meat package for action films; can't remember having seen just one good film with him in it... ------------- The razamataz is a pain in the bum |
Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: October 01 2021 at 07:00
|
I believe Angel Heart is hes best movie, but the Wrestler is also powerfull, anf hes portrail as Marv in Sin City is so beutifull in its brutality -------------
|
Posted By: verslibre
Date Posted: October 01 2021 at 14:50
|
Rourke is an excellent actor. Doubters can watch Year of the Dragon. Seagal can act, but his range is quite limited. As everyone knows, he was a martial artist for nearly twenty years, in Japan and the States, before he made his first movie. ------------- https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_ipg=50&_sop=1&_rdc=1&_ssn=musicosm" rel="nofollow - eBay |