UK General Election
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General discussions
Forum Description: Discuss any topic at all that is not music-related
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=110898
Printed Date: March 04 2025 at 02:36 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: UK General Election
Posted By: lazland
Subject: UK General Election
Date Posted: April 18 2017 at 04:13
Theresa May has called a general election for 8 June, subject to parliament ratifying this, which they have to by two thirds majority under Fixed Term Parliament Act introduced by the coalition government.
Let the British politicking commence here
------------- Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
Replies:
Posted By: M27Barney
Date Posted: April 18 2017 at 05:26
I voted for 'Bez' last time and will do again, because at least he was a local lad.
------------- Play me my song.....Here it comes again.......
|
Posted By: AZF
Date Posted: April 18 2017 at 06:54
Well it's all bullsh*t really. Did we sort out the election fraud investigations from the last time? No! Did May resign after mysteriously losing thousands of child abuse statements pointing the finger at MPs? What do you think!
Aren't elections just a chance to rubber stamp future War crimes absolve from their hostage electorate?
And Americans! So how is "Trump will be different. He'll put America first!" playing out for you?
|
Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: April 18 2017 at 07:06
Is this the poll to keep Trump out of the UK? Yea, said I. 
------------- This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: April 18 2017 at 08:23
I predict a very low turn out due to election/referendum fatigue. That may actually play better for labour, but Corbyn will have to get some fire in his belly. He normally campaigns with all the zeal and passion of a clinically depressed sloth. People don't want a 'fairer society' they want a society with less foreingers in it! Sadly, that's where we are, and Corybn won't debate the issues the great unwashed seem preoccupied with.
The whole western world is swinging towards fascism and i think it may have to just run its course because most people are too stupid to realise when they're being shafted. The people will fight back when they're down to their last shirt buttons, food rations and no healthcare. Too late then of course.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: 2dogs
Date Posted: April 18 2017 at 23:35
I'll most likely vote but not being in a marginal constituency it won't actually count for anything .
------------- "There is nothing new except what has been forgotten" - Marie Antoinette
|
Posted By: Greys0n
Date Posted: April 27 2017 at 02:51
I am not actually care about this election
|
Posted By: Stool Man
Date Posted: April 27 2017 at 06:58
Greys0n wrote:
I am not actually care about this election |
and this is you reviving a topic after more than a week to say that you don't care about it. 
------------- rotten hound of the burnie crew
|
Posted By: Vompatti
Date Posted: April 27 2017 at 07:06
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: May 20 2017 at 01:05
Greys0n wrote:
I am not actually care about this election |
Are you Jeremy Corbyn?
-------------
|
Posted By: Davesax1965
Date Posted: May 20 2017 at 03:03
I am not actually care about US election.
But that's besides the point. I'm also with SteveG, I voted to keep Trump out of the UK, too.
It seems that there is a reasonable chance of this backfiring on Teresa May. Which would be excellent, but the jury's out at the moment.
-------------
|
Posted By: Cosmiclawnmower
Date Posted: May 23 2017 at 14:40
In the light of the events last night in Manchester, campaigning has (rightly) been put on hold and (apparently) will not be conducted with the 'heat' (not light) that it had started to generate. Will it make much difference? i fear not and certainly not in my neck of the woods where the (rural) conservative vote vastly outweighs any other party. I do hope that Theresa May's expected 'landslide' does take a bashing, if at least to remind them that nothing is ever a done deal in politics.. and that we can mirror France's moderate stance in this time of pressure from the fascist Right.
-------------
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 08 2017 at 16:13
Well...we shall see how things turn out but exit polls currently indicate the tories fall short of a majority After reading frantically to see what this may mean, I gather that 1: This would be very shocking. Third time the polls would have gotten in wrong. 2: no one (except UKIP which may end up with nothing and regardless doesn't have enough seats) is willing to work with the tories so it'd be gridlock. 3: Parties could rally around Labour, thrusting Corbyn into the PM which would be one helluva twist 4: Liberals, Sinn Fein maybe others may very well refuse to work with labour so it could indeed be total gridlock 5: Regardless, May is screwed and tories aren't looking so hot.
It seems to me people had a bit of a "jerk back to reality" after brexit after happened and many regretted it. Surely many urban voters were pissed off. Why did May even call this election???
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: June 08 2017 at 16:29
Donald Trump is a blessing to the world...
... (except the US of course)
-------------
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 08 2017 at 16:58
Blacksword wrote:
I predict a very low turn out due to election/referendum fatigue. That may actually play better for labour, but Corbyn will have to get some fire in his belly. He normally campaigns with all the zeal and passion of a clinically depressed sloth. People don't want a 'fairer society' they want a society with less foreingers in it! Sadly, that's where we are, and Corybn won't debate the issues the great unwashed seem preoccupied with.
The whole western world is swinging towards fascism and i think it may have to just run its course because most people are too stupid to realise when they're being shafted. The people will fight back when they're down to their last shirt buttons, food rations and no healthcare. Too late then of course. |
Every week I am reminded more and more that politics really is the same all over. Sounds like an eerily close to home picture. Indeed, I recall rogerthat and I discussed that elsewhere, the 1930s sure did feel like it was on repeat, but damn...things have gone even more this way than I expected.
Though I do maintain slivers of hope always, before immigrants and Muslims it was austerity, much like here before police shootings opened up the racial chasm and we turned to xenophobia, it was bailouts, too much $ in government, etc etc all that got swept under the rug a bit. Let's hope it can be resurrected. People are reactionary by nature and sadly...not prone to think first. Makes it hard for Sanders, Corbyn to get people to listen. I still hope people are starting to see the collective wake up call though. 1: that the neoliberal orthodoxy has kinda f**ked things up but 2: right wing populism is no way out, and is just gunna use and screw you. So keep the racism and fear to yourself and start thinking!
I know nothing of UK politics and results are early but I'm hearing there's a not insignificant swing to labour in one area. If these exit polls are right, it's gunna be one crazy time.
|
Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: June 08 2017 at 22:37
I have gotten up an hour early to see the outcome. This hung parliament is a truly incredible result, given that Mother Theresa was about 20 points ahead in the polls at the start.
She is burnt toast, absolutely had it, and good riddance.
I said in the (ever so slightly) more popular Brexit referendum vote thread a little while back that politics is getting more interesting.
The country is more divided than ever, and the Cameron/Osbourne legacy to the UK is ever more political chaos. What a pair of (blue) tits.
------------- Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 08 2017 at 23:06
Yup, results not all in yet but it seems the Tories will fall short, even if they ally with the DU's (?) May could fall just shy. Likewise, so would a Labour-SNP-SF-PC alliance. The liberals may be the key to a coalition, or gridlock. Least that's how I'm reading all this. For the moment they refuse to work with either. Seems silly...compromise must be better than gridlock, is there any hope that Corbyn calls for a 2nd referendum to get the liberals on board?
No surprise, UKIP has been wiped off the map, SNP taken quite a hit apparently to both labour and tories. Can anyone explain why? I thought they owned Scotland basically.
Do want to say, with all the similarities in US and UK politics I noticed another: I remember the shock, and horror, at Corbyn's success, but "it wont last" and "it will doom the party". I saw probably 20 articles over time how "he's toast" "this is the end of him". Yeah...how's that panned out? It reminds me very much of Sanders here, "it wont last" "oh well OK he'll die in Nevada. Oh well South Carolina. Oh well super tuesday. Hmmmm well he'll fizzle anyway it's over" and also how he would be an obvious loss for the Democrats. Again...how did that pan out? Just interesting the media/powers that be loathe these labor populists as much as the right wing anti EU ones, but it just isn't going away. As you say lazland, politics is becoming very divided everywhere. Another similarity.
|
Posted By: AZF
Date Posted: June 08 2017 at 23:22
That was the best Election I've ever voted or stayed up to watch! Not as triumphant as 1997. Not as depressing as 2015. Not as "Stop them! They are meddling with forces they don't understand! Stop them- Mmmphh..." as 2010. I saw Labour lead for hours until 4.30. Hung Parliament! Excellent! Knew I should have made a bet!
|
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: June 09 2017 at 00:31
JJLehto wrote:
Every week I am reminded more and more that politics really is the same all over. Sounds like an eerily close to home picture. Indeed, I recall rogerthat and I discussed that elsewhere, the 1930s sure did feel like it was on repeat, but damn...things have gone even more this way than I expected.
Though I do maintain slivers of hope always, before immigrants and Muslims it was austerity, much like here before police shootings opened up the racial chasm and we turned to xenophobia, it was bailouts, too much $ in government, etc etc all that got swept under the rug a bit. Let's hope it can be resurrected. People are reactionary by nature and sadly...not prone to think first. Makes it hard for Sanders, Corbyn to get people to listen. I still hope people are starting to see the collective wake up call though. 1: that the neoliberal orthodoxy has kinda f**ked things up but 2: right wing populism is no way out, and is just gunna use and screw you. So keep the racism and fear to yourself and start thinking!
I know nothing of UK politics and results are early but I'm hearing there's a not insignificant swing to labour in one area. If these exit polls are right, it's gunna be one crazy time. |
I think, based on this result as well as Macron's big win in France, that people are already beginning to baulk at the extreme right, which is a good thing. As Teo said, Trump may be scaring off people in other parts of the world from voting in right wing governments/leaders. And because the right is being forced to move to the centre again (Macron), it presents yet another opportunity to the ailing left to wake up. At least there, the Labour party did the right thing by persisting with Corbyn unlike, ahem, the Democrats. People don't want to listen to more and more platitudes from politicians who have promised the moon to deliver next to nothing. They want to see people who relate to their anger. And while I am skeptical of populists from either side, at least a leftist within a democratic set up is a better alternative to the right.
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 09 2017 at 02:48
rogerthat wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
Every week I am reminded more and more that politics really is the same all over. Sounds like an eerily close to home picture. Indeed, I recall rogerthat and I discussed that elsewhere, the 1930s sure did feel like it was on repeat, but damn...things have gone even more this way than I expected.
Though I do maintain slivers of hope always, before immigrants and Muslims it was austerity, much like here before police shootings opened up the racial chasm and we turned to xenophobia, it was bailouts, too much $ in government, etc etc all that got swept under the rug a bit. Let's hope it can be resurrected. People are reactionary by nature and sadly...not prone to think first. Makes it hard for Sanders, Corbyn to get people to listen. I still hope people are starting to see the collective wake up call though. 1: that the neoliberal orthodoxy has kinda f**ked things up but 2: right wing populism is no way out, and is just gunna use and screw you. So keep the racism and fear to yourself and start thinking!
I know nothing of UK politics and results are early but I'm hearing there's a not insignificant swing to labour in one area. If these exit polls are right, it's gunna be one crazy time. |
I think, based on this result as well as Macron's big win in France, that people are already beginning to baulk at the extreme right, which is a good thing. As Teo said, Trump may be scaring off people in other parts of the world from voting in right wing governments/leaders. And because the right is being forced to move to the centre again (Macron), it presents yet another opportunity to the ailing left to wake up. At least there, the Labour party did the right thing by persisting with Corbyn unlike, ahem, the Democrats. People don't want to listen to more and more platitudes from politicians who have promised the moon to deliver next to nothing. They want to see people who relate to their anger. And while I am skeptical of populists from either side, at least a leftist within a democratic set up is a better alternative to the right. |
It seems that way. I won't be an arrogant American,  all credit to Europeans but surely there's been some Trump effect as well. Indeed, let's hope a leveling out is happening. I keep praying the US will reach a point of maximum rightward drift, maybe under Trump, and snap back to something more reasonable.
|
Posted By: Quinino
Date Posted: June 09 2017 at 04:33
^ & ^^
Happy to see I'm surrounded by wise fellow proggers, your words just make sense to me - even looking at your particular realities from afar I can totally relate with the thinking behind them 
|
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: June 09 2017 at 06:56
Although Theresa May may still be able to forge a coalition with 'yappy' lapdogs the DUP, it's unlikely she will still be able to negotiate her promised 'hard' Brexit with such a fudged mandate in the eyes of the EU. The UK Conservative Government have about as much leverage as 'Dodo Airlines' at these impending trade deal talks. Best case scenario?: May resigns, Labour forms a coalition Government with the SNP, Lib Dems, Greens and Plaid Cymru and negotiate a 'soft' Brexit or (let's get greedy) hold a 2nd referendum to remain in the EU and then deport every c.u.n.t who voted 'leave' to Iceland (because England were booted out of Euro 2016 by Iceland and people who shop there)
-------------
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 09 2017 at 17:14
Yup, looks like the Tories did win enough seats to form an alliance with DUP, but that is its own sticky situation. Not the least including Sinn Fein is bringing up the Good Friday agreement and I'm not saying we're going back to The Troubles, but yeah...this seems like a bad idea all around. What a mess!
I'm hearing its possible, maybe even likely, a 2nd election will be needed. May says she's not resigning but I can't imagine how she stays. Agreed...hoping, whatever the path, it will lead to a labour lead coalition. The LD's seem absolutely dedicated to remaining, so may be wise to call for a second referendum, which should be a OK with the SNP, PC and SF all of which are pro EU correct?
|
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: June 10 2017 at 06:03
JJLehto wrote:
Yup, looks like the Tories did win enough seats to form
an alliance with DUP, but that is its own sticky situation. Not the
least including Sinn Fein is bringing up the Good Friday agreement and
I'm not saying we're going back to The Troubles, but yeah...this seems
like a bad idea all around. What a mess!
I'm
hearing its possible, maybe even likely, a 2nd election will be needed.
May says she's not resigning but I can't imagine how she stays.
Agreed...hoping, whatever the path, it will lead to a labour lead
coalition. The LD's seem absolutely dedicated to remaining, so may be
wise to call for a second referendum, which should be a OK with the SNP,
PC and SF all of which are pro EU correct?
|
Yep,
May is 'dead woman walking' in the eyes of the Tory establishment for
such a dismal election campaign (although some of her fiercest
detractors need to look a lot closer to home for the reasons) She
started with a seemingly unassailable 22 point lead and had this
whittled down to just 2 when they limped over the finishing line. Not sure
about a second election being called as (I'm guessing frankly) that
either the Conservatives or Labour would have to try to continue as a
minority Government and then fail a vote of confidence from the other
parties in the house for this to happen? The Tories would get into bed
with anyone who offers them a brokered deal but I don't think Corbyn's
Labour would. SNP, PC and Sinn Fein are all purportedly pro EU but
everyone is naturally sceptical about the motivation behind three
avowedly nationalist parties embracing the 'remain' campaign while
pursuing their own manifesto pledges to leave the UK. Both the Lib Dems
and the DUP are therefore afforded conspicuous leverage, completely at
odds with their perceived ability as not even fit to govern a food fight
during a famine. Notwithstanding the disingenuous agendas of the
nationalists, maybe a Labour led coalition is the best possible outcome.
A 2nd Brexit referendum strikes me as completely antithetical to
democracy i.e. do they just keep asking the electorate to vote until the
desired result is achieved for the powers that be? (and I'm saying that as a 'remain' supporter)
-------------
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 10 2017 at 11:16
ExittheLemming wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
Yup, looks like the Tories did win enough seats to form
an alliance with DUP, but that is its own sticky situation. Not the
least including Sinn Fein is bringing up the Good Friday agreement and
I'm not saying we're going back to The Troubles, but yeah...this seems
like a bad idea all around. What a mess!
I'm
hearing its possible, maybe even likely, a 2nd election will be needed.
May says she's not resigning but I can't imagine how she stays.
Agreed...hoping, whatever the path, it will lead to a labour lead
coalition. The LD's seem absolutely dedicated to remaining, so may be
wise to call for a second referendum, which should be a OK with the SNP,
PC and SF all of which are pro EU correct?
|
Yep,
May is 'dead woman walking' in the eyes of the Tory establishment for
such a dismal election campaign (although some of her fiercest
detractors need to look a lot closer to home for the reasons) She
started with a seemingly unassailable 22 point lead and had this
whittled down to just 2 when they limped over the finishing line. Not sure
about a second election being called as (I'm guessing frankly) that
either the Conservatives or Labour would have to try to continue as a
minority Government and then fail a vote of confidence from the other
parties in the house for this to happen? The Tories would get into bed
with anyone who offers them a brokered deal but I don't think Corbyn's
Labour would. SNP, PC and Sinn Fein are all purportedly pro EU but
everyone is naturally sceptical about the motivation behind three
avowedly nationalist parties embracing the 'remain' campaign while
pursuing their own manifesto pledges to leave the UK. Both the Lib Dems
and the DUP are therefore afforded conspicuous leverage, completely at
odds with their perceived ability as not even fit to govern a food fight
during a famine. Notwithstanding the disingenuous agendas of the
nationalists, maybe a Labour led coalition is the best possible outcome.
A 2nd Brexit referendum strikes me as completely antithetical to
democracy i.e. do they just keep asking the electorate to vote until the
desired result is achieved for the powers that be? (and I'm saying that as a 'remain' supporter)
|
I have no idea, just going off what I read. Likewise I don't know quite how UK politics work, but I do share that sentiment....this is all basically the Tories fault and May just was the unfortunate soul that had to take the reins through this mess. Though I dont know whose idea it was to call the snap election, maybe May was doing as she was told but yeah I can't imagine how she doesn't resign/is booted out after this sh*tstorm. If Cameron resigned, how can May not after losing the majority, strengthening Corbyn, producing political hardship, possibly re opening Irish tensions AND putting the DUP as role of kingmaker, which I can't imagine anyone really wants.
No that's true about the questionable agendas, and even Corbyn who was pro remain I thought was known he probably favored a soft brexit, likely so he can better pursue his policies. Maybe a sift brexit is unfortunately the best route out but then Liberals aren't on board right? Oi...
Agreed, the people have spoken and if we want to believe in democracy like we claim, what can ya do? We definitely can't keep doing it over until we get the result we want  Much like Trump can win with 46% of the vote (hell, some losers have gotten more than that) but it's how our system works, and we can want reform but have to accept what has happened.
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 10 2017 at 18:03
Blacksword wrote:
I predict a very low turn out due to election/referendum fatigue. . |
I have no idea what is normal for UK elections, but turnout was over 68% and that seems pretty darn good. Then again I'm used to the US where 58% was a shockingly high turnout  Politics is important, especially these days and with what's going on in the UK I'm glad to see good turnout. Supposedly youth turnout was quite high, around 70% and the areas with the biggest swells went labour. All very relieving to see.
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: June 11 2017 at 16:30
JJLehto wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
I predict a very low turn out due to election/referendum fatigue. . |
I have no idea what is normal for UK elections, but turnout was over 68% and that seems pretty darn good. Then again I'm used to the US where 58% was a shockingly high turnout  Politics is important, especially these days and with what's going on in the UK I'm glad to see good turnout. Supposedly youth turnout was quite high, around 70% and the areas with the biggest swells went labour. All very relieving to see.
|
Yes, I was very wrong. It was a very high turn out. I think armies of youngsters got out and voted for Corbyn. Good to see, IMO.
May's position is weak, and for all her bleating about Corbyns terrorist synpathies she's jumping into bed with a bunch of flat earthers on the other side of the NI sectarian divide. Bascially we're in a f***ing mess over here.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 12 2017 at 23:43
It's very good to see. Seriously, how important was our latest election... and the youth vote fell, pretty significantly in some key states. Call it the anti UK....it could be said the youth here cost us, and we're in a mess ourselves. Quite different from what's going on there but yeah, voting matters.
Oh wow, I didn't know she leveled that attack at Corbyn (guess conservatives everywhere just call liberals soft on terrorism (or these days in bed with them)) so very ironic she's allied with a group that has actual terrorist history. Yikes. DUP seems like bad news all around. More I read into em, more I'm disturbed. Also, seems they are for soft brexit, and against austerity. Least that is what I gather. If so...what overlap do they really have with the tories? Is it possible this is the end of UK austerity?
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: June 13 2017 at 03:38
JJLehto wrote:
It's very good to see. Seriously, how important was our latest election... and the youth vote fell, pretty significantly in some key states. Call it the anti UK....it could be said the youth here cost us, and we're in a mess ourselves. Quite different from what's going on there but yeah, voting matters.
Oh wow, I didn't know she leveled that attack at Corbyn (guess conservatives everywhere just call liberals soft on terrorism (or these days in bed with them)) so very ironic she's allied with a group that has actual terrorist history. Yikes. DUP seems like bad news all around. More I read into em, more I'm disturbed. Also, seems they are for soft brexit, and against austerity. Least that is what I gather. If so...what overlap do they really have with the tories? Is it possible this is the end of UK austerity?
|
Austerity, is effectively just a weapon used by government to stifle social mobility. To limit our property and land buying power and financial independence. It's aim is to maintain clear divide between the working/middle class and the actual wealthy class. There is actually plenty of money available, it's withheld for ideological reasons, not economic. IMO. Under conservatism you'll always see the ranks of the poor swelling in correlation to the swelling of the bank accounts of the uber rich.
As far as I can see, the only real connection between the tories and DUP is a tenuous Christian link. Christian lunatics gravitate more towards conservatism than liberalism, despite the obvious mean, small minded and uncaring nature of conservatism.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: June 13 2017 at 07:56
Blacksword wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
It's very good to see. Seriously, how important was our latest election... and the youth vote fell, pretty significantly in some key states. Call it the anti UK....it could be said the youth here cost us, and we're in a mess ourselves. Quite different from what's going on there but yeah, voting matters.
Oh wow, I didn't know she leveled that attack at Corbyn (guess conservatives everywhere just call liberals soft on terrorism (or these days in bed with them)) so very ironic she's allied with a group that has actual terrorist history. Yikes. DUP seems like bad news all around. More I read into em, more I'm disturbed. Also, seems they are for soft brexit, and against austerity. Least that is what I gather. If so...what overlap do they really have with the tories? Is it possible this is the end of UK austerity?
|
Austerity, is effectively just a weapon used by government to stifle social mobility. To limit our property and land buying power and financial independence. It's aim is to maintain clear divide between the working/middle class and the actual wealthy class. There is actually plenty of money available, it's withheld for ideological reasons, not economic. IMO. Under conservatism you'll always see the ranks of the poor swelling in correlation to the swelling of the bank accounts of the uber rich.
As far as I can see, the only real connection between the tories and DUP is a tenuous Christian link. Christian lunatics gravitate more towards conservatism than liberalism, despite the obvious mean, small minded and uncaring nature of conservatism. |
I'm broadly sympathetic to what you're saying but as unpalatable it may sound (and this is coming from a left leaning humanitarian) socialism effectively distributes wealth but capitalism creates it. You may be confusing a fiscal budget surplus to which everyone contributes with the capriciously relative term 'wealth'. Wealth is NOT 'withheld' for ideological reasons in 1st world democracies. Financial surpluses are certainly redistributed for ideological reasons (read:Tax policies which are either punitive or egalitarian depending on your political orientation) If the aim of austerity was to maintain 'a clear divide between the working/middle class and the actual wealthy class' wouldn't this simply DECREASE the niche demographic that any right wing Government who implement such measures from being able to vote them into power?
-------------
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: June 13 2017 at 09:02
ExittheLemming wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
It's very good to see. Seriously, how important was our latest election... and the youth vote fell, pretty significantly in some key states. Call it the anti UK....it could be said the youth here cost us, and we're in a mess ourselves. Quite different from what's going on there but yeah, voting matters.
Oh wow, I didn't know she leveled that attack at Corbyn (guess conservatives everywhere just call liberals soft on terrorism (or these days in bed with them)) so very ironic she's allied with a group that has actual terrorist history. Yikes. DUP seems like bad news all around. More I read into em, more I'm disturbed. Also, seems they are for soft brexit, and against austerity. Least that is what I gather. If so...what overlap do they really have with the tories? Is it possible this is the end of UK austerity?
|
Austerity, is effectively just a weapon used by government to stifle social mobility. To limit our property and land buying power and financial independence. It's aim is to maintain clear divide between the working/middle class and the actual wealthy class. There is actually plenty of money available, it's withheld for ideological reasons, not economic. IMO. Under conservatism you'll always see the ranks of the poor swelling in correlation to the swelling of the bank accounts of the uber rich.
As far as I can see, the only real connection between the tories and DUP is a tenuous Christian link. Christian lunatics gravitate more towards conservatism than liberalism, despite the obvious mean, small minded and uncaring nature of conservatism. |
I'm broadly sympathetic to what you're saying but as unpalatable it may sound (and this is coming from a left leaning humanitarian) socialism effectively distributes wealth but capitalism creates it. You may be confusing a fiscal budget surplus to which everyone contributes with the capriciously relative term 'wealth'. Wealth is NOT 'withheld' for ideological reasons in 1st world democracies. Financial surpluses are certainly redistributed for ideological reasons (read:Tax policies which are either punitive or egalitarian depending on your political orientation) If the aim of austerity was to maintain 'a clear divide between the working/middle class and the actual wealthy class' wouldn't this simply DECREASE the niche demographic that any right wing Government who implement such measures from being able to vote them into power?
|
Ok, the opportunity to become wealthy is denied to the lower orders by ensuring an over priced housing market, and over priced rental market, low wages and ever decreasing support from the state.
They maintain their vote base by using the media to convince the people that the alternative is not economically sustainable and that we must be tough on those who desperately need help but can't contribute.
If there was a new war tomorrow, you'd see just how much money there really is available for the purpose of mass murder.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 13 2017 at 16:55
Blacksword wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
It's very good to see. Seriously, how important was our latest election... and the youth vote fell, pretty significantly in some key states. Call it the anti UK....it could be said the youth here cost us, and we're in a mess ourselves. Quite different from what's going on there but yeah, voting matters.
Oh wow, I didn't know she leveled that attack at Corbyn (guess conservatives everywhere just call liberals soft on terrorism (or these days in bed with them)) so very ironic she's allied with a group that has actual terrorist history. Yikes. DUP seems like bad news all around. More I read into em, more I'm disturbed. Also, seems they are for soft brexit, and against austerity. Least that is what I gather. If so...what overlap do they really have with the tories? Is it possible this is the end of UK austerity?
|
Austerity, is effectively just a weapon used by government to stifle social mobility. To limit our property and land buying power and financial independence. It's aim is to maintain clear divide between the working/middle class and the actual wealthy class. There is actually plenty of money available, it's withheld for ideological reasons, not economic. IMO. Under conservatism you'll always see the ranks of the poor swelling in correlation to the swelling of the bank accounts of the uber rich.
As far as I can see, the only real connection between the tories and DUP is a tenuous Christian link. Christian lunatics gravitate more towards conservatism than liberalism, despite the obvious mean, small minded and uncaring nature of conservatism. |
Oh trust me, preaching to the choir, and ironically the only time austerity could be justifiably done would be an expanding economy....instead we always chose to do it as a response to recession which is not only cruel but its basically like hitting the breaks going up a hill. You are of course right, its purely ideology and not economics. It's an excuse to slash government, and absolutely to maintain inequalities. Even in cases where there are legitimate needs for reform, such as Greece, austerity is a stupid idea. Why ask people to make painful cuts and changes after being plunged into a new great depression? We hear "they need to take their medicine" but austerity as a means to do so is like coating the pill in acid. Doubly screwed up because in that case austerity is being used as the justification for their bailouts, which went mostly to creditors, so we have the people paying quite heavily for the bailouts of intl banks and institutions. At least here in the US we have an independent Central Bank that can eat that mountain of sh*t assets, not that conservatives still don't push for austerity of course!
Yeah, I do wonder what DUP would demand for support. There does seem to be almost no connection, and I know the DUP is um...aggressive. I imagine they'd want to push for some of their ideas. I won't get into here since it's not the place I'll just say I'm very used to that. As ya know here Christianity is largely (but not entirely) linked with conservatism, usually an anti government brand, and I never got how the cruelness of right wing economics can be so defended with faith but eh, I've accepted in the US most people care about their politics and $ more than faith anyway.
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 13 2017 at 17:04
Yeah I was gunna say....nothing is ever a monolithic bloc. There are variations to all ideas. Capitalism has varieties, and the brand most of the world has adopted, does a piss poor job creating well being for the vast majority. So whenever I hear those arguments, I have to chuckle a little bit. Where is this wealth being created? In the US nearly all of it has gone to a few and today it's not even the Wal Marts or Microsofts....alot of it goes to people who shuffle money around for well off people, or people who inflate prices for stuff or create ways to sell us sh*t mortgages. Even Joe Stiglitz, as well as Piketty and some other enlightened mainstreamers, have said alot of today's wealth comes from people who simply sit there and extract it, either through ownership, monopoly power, and create little value.
I am a market capitalist by the way. I just think a moderate capitalism is the best way to go, and (aside from nationalization of some industries) I don't see anything socialistic about Sanders, Corbyn or most leftist parties. There's no need....we found a way to right many of the issues with capitalism, it prevailed after WWII, and it wasn't socialism.
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: June 14 2017 at 01:01
JJLehto wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
It's very good to see. Seriously, how important was our latest election... and the youth vote fell, pretty significantly in some key states. Call it the anti UK....it could be said the youth here cost us, and we're in a mess ourselves. Quite different from what's going on there but yeah, voting matters.
Oh wow, I didn't know she leveled that attack at Corbyn (guess conservatives everywhere just call liberals soft on terrorism (or these days in bed with them)) so very ironic she's allied with a group that has actual terrorist history. Yikes. DUP seems like bad news all around. More I read into em, more I'm disturbed. Also, seems they are for soft brexit, and against austerity. Least that is what I gather. If so...what overlap do they really have with the tories? Is it possible this is the end of UK austerity?
|
Austerity, is effectively just a weapon used by government to stifle social mobility. To limit our property and land buying power and financial independence. It's aim is to maintain clear divide between the working/middle class and the actual wealthy class. There is actually plenty of money available, it's withheld for ideological reasons, not economic. IMO. Under conservatism you'll always see the ranks of the poor swelling in correlation to the swelling of the bank accounts of the uber rich.
As far as I can see, the only real connection between the tories and DUP is a tenuous Christian link. Christian lunatics gravitate more towards conservatism than liberalism, despite the obvious mean, small minded and uncaring nature of conservatism. |
Oh trust me, preaching to the choir, and ironically the only time austerity could be justifiably done would be an expanding economy....instead we always chose to do it as a response to recession which is not only cruel but its basically like hitting the breaks going up a hill. You are of course right, its purely ideology and not economics. It's an excuse to slash government, and absolutely to maintain inequalities. Even in cases where there are legitimate needs for reform, such as Greece, austerity is a stupid idea. Why ask people to make painful cuts and changes after being plunged into a new great depression? We hear "they need to take their medicine" but austerity as a means to do so is like coating the pill in acid. Doubly screwed up because in that case austerity is being used as the justification for their bailouts, which went mostly to creditors, so we have the people paying quite heavily for the bailouts of intl banks and institutions. At least here in the US we have an independent Central Bank that can eat that mountain of sh*t assets, not that conservatives still don't push for austerity of course!
Yeah, I do wonder what DUP would demand for support. There does seem to be almost no connection, and I know the DUP is um...aggressive. I imagine they'd want to push for some of their ideas. I won't get into here since it's not the place I'll just say I'm very used to that. As ya know here Christianity is largely (but not entirely) linked with conservatism, usually an anti government brand, and I never got how the cruelness of right wing economics can be so defended with faith but eh, I've accepted in the US most people care about their politics and $ more than faith anyway.
|
The relationship between religion and conservative politics is quite logical I guess when you think about it. It's about control and being cruel 'to be kind' Or, in other words, it's about trying to convince people you're trying to help them, when in fact you're just trying to assert control over them.
Liberalism is deemed evil by Christian conservatives because it allows for free expression, and crucially the open challenging of Christian belief and conservative ideas, which is a demonstrable threat to that particular power structure. It's the same reason Islam is so conservative even in it's so called 'moderate' manifestations.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: June 14 2017 at 02:10
So where does this burgeoning tide of dissent against the hitherto prevalent liberalism in the west come from? I'm thinking of Le Pen in France, Wilders in the Netherlands, Hofer in Austria, Kaczynski in Poland, Orban in Hungary, Petry in Germany, Farage in the UK and Erdogan in Turkey etc. (Throw in Trump from the US as well, let's build a wall around him) You can't just blame austerity measures and a compliant media as if this were sufficient to stifle social mobility (You need hefty tuition fees to do that). I'm not even convinced there is a credible right wing media platform in the UK from which the aforementioned can voice their dubious and frankly abhorrent agenda e.g. Television and Radio have pursued a largely liberal agenda since as long as I can remember in both the US and UK. (I'm 55) Newspapers in Britain have usually been owned by a small coterie of right wing media barons but let's face it, the printed press in 2017 is a quaint anachronism. I guess I'm trying to say that the broad rump of any electorate are considerably less malleable and supine than you seem to give them credit for. Both Brexit and the UK General Election were considered a foregone conclusion before the voters returned from the polling booths. I think people are just heartily sick of the 'political class' and billionaire liberals denouncing consumerism and inequality from the confines of their own sponsored chat show
-------------
|
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: June 14 2017 at 02:16
Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got 'til it's gone.
------------- "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: June 14 2017 at 02:46
ExittheLemming wrote:
So where does this burgeoning tide of dissent against the hitherto prevalent liberalism in the west come from? I'm thinking of Le Pen in France, Wilders in the Netherlands, Hofer in Austria, Kaczynski in Poland, Orban in Hungary, Petry in Germany, Farage in the UK and Erdogan in Turkey etc. (Throw in Trump from the US as well, let's build a wall around him) You can't just blame austerity measures and a compliant media as if this were sufficient to stifle social mobility (You need hefty tuition fees to do that). I'm not even convinced there is a credible right wing media platform in the UK from which the aforementioned can voice their dubious and frankly abhorrent agenda e.g. Television and Radio have pursued a largely liberal agenda since as long as I can remember in both the US and UK. (I'm 55) Newspapers in Britain have usually been owned by a small coterie of right wing media barons but let's face it, the printed press in 2017 is a quaint anachronism. I guess I'm trying to say that the broad rump of any electorate are considerably less malleable and supine than you seem to give them credit for. Both Brexit and the UK General Election were considered a foregone conclusion before the voters returned from the polling booths. I think people are just heartily sick of the 'political class' and billionaire liberals denouncing consumerism and inequality from the confines of their own sponsored chat show
|
There is an ongoing debate underway in the UK as to whether the BBC has a right wing or left wing bias. For starters, Let's not confuse liberal with left wing..
I believe the BBC has an 'establishment bias' which is a very different thing. We know the BBC is gushingly and unconditionally pro monarchy; a mostly, by no means exclusive, conservative position. We also know that despite the corporations transparent almost cynical attempts to appear inclusive, diverse and politically correct, they unashamedly go easier on conservative MP's than they do on members of the current labour party. The treatment of Jeremy Corbyn throughout election campaigning was at times mocking and borderline abusive.
Although sales of newspapers may be down on what they were 15 years ago, tabloids do still sell well, and the tory rags The Sun and The Daily Mail are the biggest selling. Overall most newspapers have a conservative bias, broadsheets and tabloids. It's only really the Mirror, The Guardia and The Observer which have a liberal/left bias. The Independent isn't a serious newspaper IMO. It's just a neo-liberal globalist newsletter. Don't forget also that people read papers on line, so they reach a large and potentially far younger audience there.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: June 14 2017 at 03:49
The only blatant bias I can detect with the BBC is it's steadfast refusal to criticise Israel regardless of how heinous are its foreign policy actions. Can't say I can vouch for Labour politicians getting a rougher ride than the Tories from the BBC but you probably see a lot more coverage then me (I live in Australia) I don't think I'm confusing liberal with left wing but just mean by the former a reformist, tolerant, inclusive and altruistic set of values. I'm disappointed you don't rate the Independent as I've loved it since it's inception in 1986. It's a pro-market left leaning newspaper viewspaper but I don't see how you equate that with a globalist mindset. For me, the notion of globalism has become tantamount to an alarmist rallying call to what are perceived as the perils of nationalism throughout history.
-------------
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: June 14 2017 at 03:56
ExittheLemming wrote:
The only blatant bias I can detect with the BBC is it's steadfast refusal to criticise Israel regardless of how heinous <span -dobid="hdw">are </span>its foreign policy actions. Can't say I can vouch for Labour politicians getting a rougher ride than the Tories from the BBC but you probably see a lot more coverage then me (I live in Australia) I don't think I'm confusing liberal with left wing but just mean by the former a reformist, tolerant, inclusive and altruistic set of values. I'm disappointed you don't rate the Independent as I've loved it since it's inception in 1986. It's a pro-market left leaning newspaper but I don't see how you equate that with a globalist mindset. For me, the notion of globalism has become an alarmist rallying call to what are perceived as the perils of nationalism throughout history.
|
Funny you should mention Israel in relation to the BBC. There are those who believe it is totally anti Isreal. I don't agree though. Maybe that just goes to show that we see what we want to see when it comes to bias.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: June 14 2017 at 04:01
Atavachron wrote:
Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got 'til it's gone.
|
Possibly, we've maybe been guilty of taking many things for granted in the UK. Although I no longer live there, I fear the worst for the outcome of the Brexit negotiations. The EU are going to ensure that the exit terms afforded to the UK will make any member nation abandon entirely the very idea of leaving in the future
-------------
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 14 2017 at 19:54
ExittheLemming wrote:
So where does this burgeoning tide of dissent against the hitherto prevalent liberalism in the west come from? I'm thinking of Le Pen in France, Wilders in the Netherlands, Hofer in Austria, Kaczynski in Poland, Orban in Hungary, Petry in Germany, Farage in the UK and Erdogan in Turkey etc. (Throw in Trump from the US as well, let's build a wall around him) You can't just blame austerity measures and a compliant media as if this were sufficient to stifle social mobility (You need hefty tuition fees to do that). I'm not even convinced there is a credible right wing media platform in the UK from which the aforementioned can voice their dubious and frankly abhorrent agenda e.g. Television and Radio have pursued a largely liberal agenda since as long as I can remember in both the US and UK. (I'm 55) Newspapers in Britain have usually been owned by a small coterie of right wing media barons but let's face it, the printed press in 2017 is a quaint anachronism. I guess I'm trying to say that the broad rump of any electorate are considerably less malleable and supine than you seem to give them credit for. Both Brexit and the UK General Election were considered a foregone conclusion before the voters returned from the polling booths. I think people are just heartily sick of the 'political class' and billionaire liberals denouncing consumerism and inequality from the confines of their own sponsored chat show
|
Well to be fair.....liberals, (ahem mainstream liberals) in much of the world has accepted austerity or some degree of it. It's been our last two Democratic President's that agreed to fiscal restraint after all, and heck all these "socialist" and "labor" parties seem to embrace it as well. Thus the rise of anti liberal left wing populism  As for the right wing populism and specifically a rejection of liberalism, I DO think bad times are one source. People turn to extremes when times are bad, they entrench, as Obama said here "people cling to guns and religion" we turn on each other and form tribes. Part is people are naturally reactionary. Some police shootings, terrorist attacks, people start turning anger that at other groups, or subdued racial feelings get unleashed.
I do agree, people are tired of the political class. I sure as hell am. Just it's not all liberal ya know....I am kinda confused why there's the insistence on "people are rejecting liberalism" or "the liberal elite". Both here and in some other countries, mainstream conservative parties are under as much internal fire as the left. The political class, as a whole, is under attack. Part is their arrogance, their ignoring masses of people and....neoliberalism/austerity lol I tell ya, that was the big beef until 2-3 years ago when immigration became the hot button. Same here....it was all bailouts, big gov, $ in politics etc from the tea party until a few years and they shifted to culture war type stuff.
|
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: June 16 2017 at 10:23
Re the anti-liberal elite sentiment, some of it is language. There's a passage in J D Vance's Hillbilly Elegy (haven't read but the excerpt was quoted in an article) where he describes having to go to court as a child because his mother was being tried for a crime and found that most of the other undertrials spoke like his family whereas the judge and the lawyers had 'TV accents'. Likewise, it may be that those living in the UK heartland despise RP accents. Metropolitan people speaking in a refined way seems to come across as talking down to those from the heartland. In times past, liberals were still connected enough to the heartland culture to not appear alien. Best example is M K Gandhi who had practiced as a lawyer in South Africa but was able to also connect to the Indian masses by the millions and like no other Indian leader since. I cannot comment on how it is in the US or UK but I have noticed here in India that upper/upper-middle class urbanites often struggle to speak Hindi or say some other Indian language in a way that the working class would relate to. It's too polished and anglicised; for instance TV journalists who hail from Northern India (where Hindi is the most widely used language) struggle to speak a full sentence without using an English word. This may seem trivial on the face of it but it seems there is a lot of baggage attached to language and how it is used in the cities vis a vis the heartland. With social values also moving in a progressive direction much more rapidly in the cities, the gap has only widened. Mainstream Hindi cinema has gone from mocking gay people to celebrating them in just the space of 10-12 years. But has society also really moved that fast? I am afraid not. Whether or not it leads to Brexit/Trump, I think it will continue to create problems for the next few/several years.
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 17 2017 at 00:54
That sounds about right. I'd agree accent, or in the case of the US....tone, inflection, way of carrying etc is a part of it. The arrogant and snooty coastal urban elites, and there is a very clear urban vs rural divide that's always present in US politics but really was driven in 2016. From what I can tell this is the case in the UK, France, Netherlands and I'm sure other countries. India as well it seems. Even though the conservatives in some of these places may be more open to economic leftism...socially/culturally seems the urban/rural divide exists everywhere. Yeah I've realized part of Trump's appeal is simply a counter reaction to progress. His fans are so...enigmatic, vague, all over the place and never seem to really care about his flip flops or policy at all. They just love him, and I could never get why. Even economically these people sometimes sound like rabid gov hating tea partiers. I think overall, Trump vents the frustration of the "heartland" to progress.
In a very short span, gay marriage went from accepted in a few blue states to nation wide. A new state here and there, then it felt like a new one every week, then boom suddenly it's made legal across the country. I mean 2004 an election was won largely on the premise of not allowing gay marriage, 2015 its now law for the US. Oh and the police shootings/rise of BLM. That opened up the nasty race problem that is always lingering in the US just under the surface. Seriously that has brought alot of darkness up to the surface. Isis has sprouted up, and there's been a few lone wolf events in the US. Gay marriage, racial tensions reopened, isis/terrorism that's alot of rapid change in a short span, and people have knee jerked because of it. As always cruddy economy too.
|
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: June 17 2017 at 01:15
rogerthat wrote:
Re the anti-liberal elite sentiment, some of it is language. There's a passage in J D Vance's Hillbilly Elegy (haven't read but the excerpt was quoted in an article) where he describes having to go to court as a child because his mother was being tried for a crime and found that most of the other undertrials spoke like his family whereas the judge and the lawyers had 'TV accents'. Likewise, it may be that those living in the UK heartland despise RP accents. Metropolitan people speaking in a refined way seems to come across as talking down to those from the heartland. In times past, liberals were still connected enough to the heartland culture to not appear alien. Best example is M K Gandhi who had practiced as a lawyer in South Africa but was able to also connect to the Indian masses by the millions and like no other Indian leader since. I cannot comment on how it is in the US or UK but I have noticed here in India that upper/upper-middle class urbanites often struggle to speak Hindi or say some other Indian language in a way that the working class would relate to. It's too polished and anglicised; for instance TV journalists who hail from Northern India (where Hindi is the most widely used language) struggle to speak a full sentence without using an English word. This may seem trivial on the face of it but it seems there is a lot of baggage attached to language and how it is used in the cities vis a vis the heartland. With social values also moving in a progressive direction much more rapidly in the cities, the gap has only widened. Mainstream Hindi cinema has gone from mocking gay people to celebrating him in just the space of 10-12 years. But has society also really moved that fast? I am afraid not. Whether or not it leads to Brexit/Trump, I think it will continue to create problems for the next few/several years. |
That's interesting and perhaps has parallels with the so-called class system in the UK (which isn't a system at all of course) The demarcation isn't quite as clear-cut between cities v heartland/regions as you describe it in India. The working class origins of English people is often betrayed by their pronunciation habits. Their dropping of the 'h' at the beginning of a word e.g. 'if it's got an 'aitch in it' and substituting an 'f' or a 'v' for 'th' e.g. 'I live in norf London' and 'we were just like bruvvers' is heard very strongly from London cockneys for instance. Similarly, it took until the 1980's before 'regional' accents became acceptable on the BBC from its employees. I do agree strongly that language is most definitely not a trivial matter when it comes to measuring social mobility, stratification or status. Case in point: the England football team was manged by Sir Alf Ramsay for 11 years. Alf spoke in a voice that sounded like Terry Thomas impersonating Noel Coward as if the latter had graduated from Sandhurst. In reality, he was the dirt poor son of a labourer from Dagenham in Essex and started life with an accent like Ray Winstone before a spell in the army and elocution lessons had him resembling a plummy Sergeant Major. That said, we appear to have veered off topic a tad...
-------------
|
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: June 17 2017 at 01:37
ExittheLemming wrote:
That's interesting and perhaps has parallels with the so-called class system in the UK (which isn't a system at all of course) The demarcation isn't quite as clear-cut between cities v heartland/regions as you describe it in India. The working class origins of English people is often betrayed by their pronunciation habits. Their dropping of the 'h' at the beginning of a word e.g. 'if it's got an 'aitch in it' and substituting an 'f' or a 'v' for 'th' e.g. 'I live in norf London' and 'we were just like bruvvers' is heard very strongly from London cockneys for instance. Similarly, it took until the 1980's before 'regional' accents became acceptable on the BBC from its employees. I do agree strongly that language is most definitely not a trivial matter when it comes to measuring social mobility, stratification or status. Case in point: the England football team was manged by Sir Alf Ramsay for 11 years. Alf spoke in a voice that sounded like Terry Thomas impersonating Noel Coward as if the latter had graduated from Sandhurst. In reality, he was the dirt poor son of a labourer from Dagenham in Essex and started life with an accent like Ray Winstone before a spell in the army and elocution lessons had him resembling a plummy Sergeant Major. That said, we appear to have veered off topic a tad...
|
It isn't necessarily always clear cut in India either; much depends on the background. I am not so disconnected because I grew up in a far flung suburb. But there are those who grew up in downtown Mumbai and can barely speak Hindi at all, to the point where their pronunciation of Hindi names is no better than, excuse me, a foreigner. I see the latter class growing as the middle/upper class grows in prosperity and moves in ever higher social circles. The frightening backlash to this gave us Modi. Though...there is also this thing called jingoism so you'd even find those among aforementioned rarefied Mumbai elites who fervently admire him. As I am sure there are wealthy people who admire Trump.
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: June 19 2017 at 22:59
The urban/rural divide seems most pronounced in the US. It's a night and day difference. From what I can tell, in the UK and some other Euro countries, there are rural ares that will vote leftist. People who may be conservative socially/in nature but still get the concept of ya know, voting in their own self benefit Unlike here in the states where decades of kool aid, erm I mean mythology,(culture??) has brainwashed people to vote against their own benefit. Though I guess there is the case of Wales, which gets $ from the EU, votes to leave the EU.
But yeah, it's pretty clear cut. Language is a major factor more I think about it. Trump "tells it like it is" "is a straight shooter" "doesn't BS around" "says what he means" "isn't worried about PC" or my favorite "he has balls" Personally I think all of this is total crap (well except being PC that he really isn't worried about) but yeah, people eat it up. Same with our other favorite strong man populist, Duterte who is famous for "street talk" and common person lingo. I've read that many find him refreshing or at the least: real. "You know what you get". It can cut either way. A big part of Sanders' appeal was I think his realness. He was not polished, not a great debater, and while he could convey lots of sometimes complex ideas intelligently, and when sitting down in a quiet interview he was quite calm and smart, he was famous for his manic preacher like fire spitting. He bumbled and stumbled sometimes, I'd shake my head or cringe but it never impacted him. In a very different but similar way, I read many found Corbyn refreshing. His lack of polish, sometimes errors and oddities were: human. Guess yeah, I agree ha In today's politics people are striving for language of the people and realness, not lines that feel planned and vetted by teams of lawyers and PR consultants.
|
Posted By: Richey Edwards
Date Posted: September 28 2017 at 07:34
JJLehto wrote:
SNP taken quite a hit apparently to both labour and tories. Can anyone explain why? I thought they owned Scotland basically. |
Sorry to resurrect an old topic, but as a Scotsman I thought I would answer your question. Until 2007 the Scottish parliament in Edinburgh was ran by Labour, and until the 2015 General Election Labour used to always win the majority of the Scottish seats for the Westminster government. In fact, there was a commonly used saying in Scotland that Labour could pin a red rosette on a monkey and would still get elected here.
However, Labour gradually stagnated in power and were eventually ousted by the pro-independence Scottish National Party in 2007. The SNP were re-elected for a second term in 2011, and their 2011 manifesto included a promise to hold a referendum on Scottish Independence during their second term in office if they were re-elected. The referendum eventually took place in 2014, with No winning with 55% of the vote. The 2015 General Election saw the SNP win 56 out of 59 seats in Scotland, effectively wiping out Labour in Scotland. Many saw this as a reaction to the independence referendum result, and an indication of a hunger for a second referendum in the future. Some saw it as an indication that the SNP had replaced Labour as the party of the working class in Scotland, with many citing the fact that Labour and the Conservatives were not really different from each other at the time. At the 2017 General Election, Labour won back some seats from the SNP and the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats also took seats from the SNP, reducing the number of SNP seats from 56 to 35. In my opinion, the SNP campaign during the 2017 election was very weak. I never really saw any campaigning going on, which was strange as the constituency where I live is formerly a Labour stronghold but was controlled by the SNP between 2015 and 2017 but is now a Conservative seat. I think that the SNP took it for granted that they would repeat their success of 2015 and underestimated the opposition to their proposal to hold a second independence referendum. Also, the "Corbyn effect" attracted left-wing voters from the SNP to Labour and many people who oppose a second independence referendum voted tactically in the election to ensure that pro-independence candidates were defeated by candidates from pro-UK parties.
I hope I've explained that alright. If you have any questions about anything else just ask.
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: September 29 2017 at 06:07
I think the backlash against the liberalista is quite funny, and thinking about it, was also inevitable. If you want someone to blame for Brexit/Trump etc then look no further than the likes of Tony Blair. The liberalista had a choice; to make their peoples wealthier by globally reforming taxation and wealth distribution, but failed to do so and instead, stated perilous wars, and squandered trillions bailing out their friends in the banks, while all the while pretending to be the caring, sharing pro gay rights liberals they actually were not!
People got f***ed off with them, and went back to base tribal politcs of far right and loony left. As the worlds slides towards facsism and probable world war, the history books - if there are any - will recount the patterns and parallels in economic and political conditions in the run up to the last two world wars and there will be a great debate about how unbelievable it was tha no one saw it all coming.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: Quinino
Date Posted: September 29 2017 at 07:38
^ I'm afraid you (probably) are quite right 
|
Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: September 29 2017 at 10:04
Quinino wrote:
^ I'm afraid you (probably) are quite right 
|
There is no probably about it. Andy articulates very well the precise problem, and I have been saying much the same for a very long time.
------------- Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: September 30 2017 at 09:51
lazland wrote:
Quinino wrote:
^ I'm afraid you (probably) are quite right 
|
There is no probably about it. Andy articulates very well the precise problem, and I have been saying much the same for a very long time. |
Thank you. I just hope I'm wrong, but the world appears in a dire state right now. It's easy to say it'd always been that way, it's just more obvious now because of 24 hour news, the internet etc etc, but it seems that numerous more experienced commentators than I are saying we're in more danger now than during the Cuban missile crisis. If it's any measure, the Institute of atomic scientists have set the 'Doomsday clock' to 2.5 mins to midnight, which is closer than at anytime during the cold war, including Cuba.
Normalcy bias could be the death of many.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: October 01 2017 at 14:46
Richey Edwards wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
SNP taken quite a hit apparently to both labour and tories. Can anyone explain why? I thought they owned Scotland basically. |
Sorry to resurrect an old topic, but as a Scotsman I thought I would answer your question. Until 2007 the Scottish parliament in Edinburgh was ran by Labour, and until the 2015 General Election Labour used to always win the majority of the Scottish seats for the Westminster government. In fact, there was a commonly used saying in Scotland that Labour could pin a red rosette on a monkey and would still get elected here.
However, Labour gradually stagnated in power and were eventually ousted by the pro-independence Scottish National Party in 2007. The SNP were re-elected for a second term in 2011, and their 2011 manifesto included a promise to hold a referendum on Scottish Independence during their second term in office if they were re-elected. The referendum eventually took place in 2014, with No winning with 55% of the vote. The 2015 General Election saw the SNP win 56 out of 59 seats in Scotland, effectively wiping out Labour in Scotland. Many saw this as a reaction to the independence referendum result, and an indication of a hunger for a second referendum in the future. Some saw it as an indication that the SNP had replaced Labour as the party of the working class in Scotland, with many citing the fact that Labour and the Conservatives were not really different from each other at the time. At the 2017 General Election, Labour won back some seats from the SNP and the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats also took seats from the SNP, reducing the number of SNP seats from 56 to 35. In my opinion, the SNP campaign during the 2017 election was very weak. I never really saw any campaigning going on, which was strange as the constituency where I live is formerly a Labour stronghold but was controlled by the SNP between 2015 and 2017 but is now a Conservative seat. I think that the SNP took it for granted that they would repeat their success of 2015 and underestimated the opposition to their proposal to hold a second independence referendum. Also, the "Corbyn effect" attracted left-wing voters from the SNP to Labour and many people who oppose a second independence referendum voted tactically in the election to ensure that pro-independence candidates were defeated by candidates from pro-UK parties.
I hope I've explained that alright. If you have any questions about anything else just ask. |
Sounds about right, with what I've heard but I guess my question was more why did the SNP lose so bad. You seem to think it was poor campaigning and just assuming they stay in power (which makes total sense, it plagued the Democratic Party last year). Never in politics can ya just kinda assume you will remain in power/will win and not try that hard (again, lesson to some older Democrats here who seem to think if we just wait in 20 years we'll run the nation forever)
However, I am always curious about what parties support austerity and what the backlash is (tis my pet project ha) and from what I gather the SNP either pursued austerity or vocally supported it/didn't sound very convincing in their opposition so I wondered if that helped as well.
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: October 01 2017 at 15:05
Blacksword wrote:
I think the backlash against the liberalista is quite funny, and thinking about it, was also inevitable. If you want someone to blame for Brexit/Trump etc then look no further than the likes of Tony Blair. The liberalista had a choice; to make their peoples wealthier by globally reforming taxation and wealth distribution, but failed to do so and instead, stated perilous wars, and squandered trillions bailing out their friends in the banks, while all the while pretending to be the caring, sharing pro gay rights liberals they actually were not!
People got f***ed off with them, and went back to base tribal politcs of far right and loony left. As the worlds slides towards facsism and probable world war, the history books - if there are any - will recount the patterns and parallels in economic and political conditions in the run up to the last two world wars and there will be a great debate about how unbelievable it was tha no one saw it all coming. |
It's happening all over. I know all across Europe their leftist parties have drifted to the center and in general all their parties are occupying a vaguely centrist realm and taking mostly the same positions. With both left and right options being taken away, and the feeling that politics doesnt work for you...this is just plain ol history. You called it there. This all, quite literally, happened before.
Same here in the US (well in our case the left party drifted center and the right party has venture into nihilistic-ally right) and without a true liberal option, and with conservatives who feel they are being left behind (aka things change and they are grasping for the old ways) yeah makes sense we get Sanders and Trump. Though even the Republicans now are becoming anti trade in rhetoric and talk about jobs and wages and etc Basically left and right, globally, are rejecting the FriedmanThatcherReagan revolution. BUT all us silly angsty lefties whining about labor and globalization and inequality and "hey maybe this isnt working out quite like yall say" were mocked and ignored all those years.
Shame is this all indeed has happened before...
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 02 2017 at 02:50
JJLehto wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
I think the backlash against the liberalista is quite funny, and thinking about it, was also inevitable. If you want someone to blame for Brexit/Trump etc then look no further than the likes of Tony Blair. The liberalista had a choice; to make their peoples wealthier by globally reforming taxation and wealth distribution, but failed to do so and instead, stated perilous wars, and squandered trillions bailing out their friends in the banks, while all the while pretending to be the caring, sharing pro gay rights liberals they actually were not!
People got f***ed off with them, and went back to base tribal politcs of far right and loony left. As the worlds slides towards facsism and probable world war, the history books - if there are any - will recount the patterns and parallels in economic and political conditions in the run up to the last two world wars and there will be a great debate about how unbelievable it was tha no one saw it all coming. |
It's happening all over. I know all across Europe their leftist parties have drifted to the center and in general all their parties are occupying a vaguely centrist realm and taking mostly the same positions. With both left and right options being taken away, and the feeling that politics doesnt work for you...this is just plain ol history. You called it there. This all, quite literally, happened before.
Same here in the US (well in our case the left party drifted center and the right party has venture into nihilistic-ally right) and without a true liberal option, and with conservatives who feel they are being left behind (aka things change and they are grasping for the old ways) yeah makes sense we get Sanders and Trump. Though even the Republicans now are becoming anti trade in rhetoric and talk about jobs and wages and etc Basically left and right, globally, are rejecting the FriedmanThatcherReagan revolution. BUT all us silly angsty lefties whining about labor and globalization and inequality and "hey maybe this isnt working out quite like yall say" were mocked and ignored all those years.
Shame is this all indeed has happened before... |
Indeed, although another way of looking at it is that actually it IS working, because it's architechts are wealthier than ever. Maybe it was always only supposed to work for the speculators.
The banking crisis consolidated wealth in the hands of the very few, inflicted austerity on the poor, and started the taking down of the middle classes. The endgame; one serf class and a ruling elite.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: October 02 2017 at 23:00
Oh yes, neoliberalism is absolutely working as intended. I'm sure some truly believed their words, and as it got rolled out it became divine law, but no doubt many of its architects knew what would happen, and didn't care. They were motivated by ideology or self benefit. Problem with the EU btw at its core is that is was built on these ideals.
Yup, that is the end game of it all. People always scoff or think it's hyperbole but it's just knowledge of history and observation of what's happening (plus some logical thought). Taken to its conclusion a largely 2 class society is all that really can emerge. And we're heading there. People seemed to be waking up to this, but yup...fear of immigrants (that they are rarely ever gunna interact with) distracted em all. Add to it a knee jerk reaction to intellectuals (aka evidence and rational discourse) and "liberalism" (aka the improvement of women, non whites, LGBT rights, trying to save the planet and fear from white males losing their standing) and here we are. The ultimate blow to maximum free market woooooo! mythology: People are often irrational, short sighted, easily swayed and miss the mark entirely  
Since this has been restarted, news here is sorely lacking and I have been busy. How exactly are things going across the pond? How are Brexit talks going and I guess the world hasn't ended from the Tory-DUP alliance.
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 03 2017 at 06:20
There has been no progress in the Brexit talks as far as I'm aware.
No one really knows what the government wants from Brexit, or the opposition, to be fair, because they've never made it clear, and probably don't really know themselves. One thing is for sure, the UK doesn't have any trump cards to play.
The referendum was the biggest political miscalculation in history. Asking the people to vote on someting they haven't got the first clue about is clearly insane. David Cameron was banking on a remain landslide, but was clearly very out of touch with the zeitgeist.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: October 03 2017 at 14:20
Sincere question: is there likely to be ANY brexit progress? I kind of imagined there being so much infighting and external fighting and its such a big thing with so many details and with politics in the way, I could see by the end the UK just leaves with literally no plan on either side hammered out. Will the UK even leave?? I'm actually wondering if there's any chance in the end yall just dont do it.
It does seem that that no one has any idea yeah. I got the feeling, and you seem to confirm this, that no one (even supporters) actually expected Yes to win, so never bothered. So now literally everyone is caught with their pants down running around trying to figure it out on the fly. I have indeed read that even Labour seems to have no idea what they want with Corbyn being vague and taking the "I just want jobs for the UK regardless of what we do" which I am for but thats certainly not a very concrete plan. What a mess.
That's for sure, everyone everywhere has missed the zeitgeist it seems, and people are clearly not equipped to make these populist decisions. And that's not a slight at the UK, look at our mess. When there is a backlash against intellectualism....I reckon that's what is gunna happen. People can gripe about elites and the power and etc and sure there's some validity but it's mostly bullsh*t, and the result is all this mess. Yikes.
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: October 03 2017 at 23:44
JJLehto wrote:
Sincere question: is there likely to be ANY brexit progress? I kind of imagined there being so much infighting and external fighting and its such a big thing with so many details and with politics in the way, I could see by the end the UK just leaves with literally no plan on either side hammered out. Will the UK even leave?? I'm actually wondering if there's any chance in the end yall just dont do it.
It does seem that that no one has any idea yeah. I got the feeling, and you seem to confirm this, that no one (even supporters) actually expected Yes to win, so never bothered. So now literally everyone is caught with their pants down running around trying to figure it out on the fly. I have indeed read that even Labour seems to have no idea what they want with Corbyn being vague and taking the "I just want jobs for the UK regardless of what we do" which I am for but thats certainly not a very concrete plan. What a mess.
That's for sure, everyone everywhere has missed the zeitgeist it seems, and people are clearly not equipped to make these populist decisions. And that's not a slight at the UK, look at our mess. When there is a backlash against intellectualism....I reckon that's what is gunna happen. People can gripe about elites and the power and etc and sure there's some validity but it's mostly bullsh*t, and the result is all this mess. Yikes.
|
I've no idea how it will turn out, in terms of a deal, but it will take many years to finalise, and I would expect years of economic uncertainty, and unless there's a labour victory at the next election in the UK, I would also expect our domestic politics to move ever further to the right without the EU's protection.
As there is an obnoxious and nasty arrogance on the right, their is also authoritarian sanctimosity and pomposity on the liberal left which has pushed people this way, and they can't even see it.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: October 06 2017 at 12:03
The nasty arrogance is absolutely on both sides, it's like I've said elsewhere: People gripe about this populism, but I think they fail to see the real problem (because they're part of it) if populism like this is so popular it's because the mainstream has screwed up so bad. Not like all this magically appeared out of nowhere.
Ah yes, if the Tory led government pushes more austerity, it will indeed drag down/harm the economy long run...but this time people would actually have to turn their anger inward and wouldn't be able to blame the EU anymore. No idea what the overall sentiment on social issues is in the UK, but immigration is likely gunna be on trial yeah
|
|