Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Dick Heath
Special Collaborator
Jazz-Rock Specialist
Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12813
|
Posted: July 25 2005 at 06:56 |
beterdedthnred4 wrote:
At the risk of throwing this thread off-topic, I love Methany's American Garage album, and any prog fans who love jazzy bands like Hatfield and the North and traditional fusion should seek this album out. |
I agree, American Garage is a good point to start with Metheny (in fact that's where I started having heard the album played over the main speakers of a good record shop around 1980). However, to demonstrate that we trying to compare chalk and cheese in this thread, check out Metheny's Rarum Selected Recordings for the range of the man's playing facility.
What next: Segovia v Fripp?
|
|
Olympus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 545
|
Posted: October 29 2005 at 19:27 |
kirklott wrote:
walrus wrote:
I really think that Pat Metheny is better guitarrist than Steve Howe....
are you agree or disagree??*
(*) not for fans , only for real listeners..
|
No chance. New age noodler (Matheny) vs. timeless, world-class, genre-defying artiste par excellence (Howe)
|
I agree with kirklott Steve howe is of a much higher standard.
|
"Let's get the hell away from this Eerie-ass piece of work so we can get on with the rest of our eerie-ass day"
|
|
Phil
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 17 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1881
|
Posted: October 29 2005 at 20:58 |
maybe he is but...so what? He hasn't contributed to classics like CTTE and GOD. Metheny is a first class noodler but after a while my ears tire of him.
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: October 29 2005 at 21:58 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
I think that a lot of guitarists are "better than Howe", if you compare the complexity of the music that they played. But how do we know if Howe couldn't have played that stuff if he had wanted to? I think he's a good guitarist ... and the question "is X better than Y" can only be answered individually anyway. |
Good answer Mike, but you have pointed my great problem with most Prog Metal fans, they believe in a simple equation:
Complexity = Greatness
Sorry, but this is absurd, skills have absolutely no relation with the quality of the musician. I doubt any living guitar player is in the level of Paco de Lucia, but I know a lot of posers from many genres that play more complex pieces of crap.
Iván
|
|
|
M. B. Zapelini
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 21 2005
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 773
|
Posted: October 30 2005 at 07:48 |
I personnally think that Pat Metheny and Steve Howe are SO different that it is pointless to discuss who is better. By the awy, if you want a decent jazz guitar player, not a muzak jazz player as Metheny, check out for Django Reinhardt, Charlie Christian, Wes Montgomery and Joe Pass. If you want a better contemporary jazz guitarist, John Scofield and John McLaughlin are far better than Metheny. Pat Metheny is very skilled, very talented as a player - but his music is not as good as it could be, he lacks feeling.
|
"He's a man of the past and one of the present"
PETER HAMMILL
|
|
floydaholic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 30 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 240
|
Posted: October 30 2005 at 22:24 |
Trouserpress wrote:
Yep. Very different genre though. Odd post, this... |
|
I'll see you on the Darkside of the moon...
|
|
Eetu Pellonpaa
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828
|
Posted: October 31 2005 at 07:19 |
I think that Ralph Towner is better than Metheny or Howe!
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.