Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17777
Posted: March 02 2011 at 14:57
Hi,
The Who's Tommy was much more important as a composition and validated a lot of popular music as much more than shlock for sale. And it helped define a band that deserves a lot more credit for their music, than just a hit or a sale.
Led Zep's album, much later, only helped establish them as the FM radio darlings in America, after their monster hit on the previous album. However, the importance of effect of the material on the music world did NOT have the effect that Tommy originally did, which had professors and academicos up in arms upset that someone with an electric guitar would call their bunch of songs a "rock opera" ... and of course, to this day, we still don't believe it, or give a care anyway ... it's all about the songs.
LZ's 5th album was a nice one, that was glamorized even more by the Hipgnosis cover, which in the original 12x12 made it ... wow ... this is far out ... and the album was good.
(re-worded from before for accidental error having confused this album with LZ3)
Edited by moshkito - March 02 2011 at 17:59
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17777
Posted: March 02 2011 at 18:02
harmonium.ro wrote:
I think the better comparison would have been Tommy vs II. The first rock opera vs. the first hard-rock/heavy metal album. That would have been tough. ...
You mean Led Zeppelin, the first album? ... yeah baby ... communication breakdown ....
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Posted: March 02 2011 at 18:17
moshkito wrote:
harmonium.ro wrote:
I think the better comparison would have been Tommy vs II. The first rock opera vs. the first hard-rock/heavy metal album. That would have been tough. ...
You mean Led Zeppelin, the first album? ... yeah baby ... communication breakdown ....
Hi,
No, I mean Zepp II... Whole Lotta Love, Heartbreaker and all that sh*t...
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65305
Posted: March 03 2011 at 04:39
yeah not a big Houses fan myself; the material, renderings and studio sound are extremely uneven for a Zep album, and the live versions are far superior anyway
Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
Posted: March 11 2011 at 09:30
Tommy is a more important album for me, but houses is allso great. However i feel like voting tommy, since it was a more imortant and mind opening album for me personaly.
Joined: July 15 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 96
Posted: March 29 2011 at 14:31
That one was easy, Tommy all the way!
"Wear the grudge like a crown of negativity. Calculate what we will or will not tolerate. Desperate to control all and everything. Unable to forgive your scarlet letterman."
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.129 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.