17%

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

 micky wrote:

 anael wrote:

mmmm oh hell! Metallica? 
the only thing i gotta say is that people shouldn't judge the whole discography by a band (not specially Metallica) by only one proggy album, the same thing with Journey! The Who! The Doors! and some more bands......

Metallica is not a Prog band and that's it!!!! if it is, then Chicago is another prog band right?

if PA will judge a band by one album of a band's discography then please consider these bands too:

The Chicago Transit Authority
Chicago
Goldfrapp
For The Mathematics
Atlas of ID
Jack Rose
ES
Fursaxa
Majik Markers
Kemialliset Ystävät
Brothers of The Occult Sisterhood
A Palace in Persia
The Spacious Mind
You Slut!
Terracid
Wolfmangler
Rialzu
Rahmann
Ultima Spiaggia
Grateful Dead
Super Freego
Frakkur
Maps
Sleeping People
Klimt 1918

some time ago i suggest more bands such as:

Of Sinking Ships
Don't Mess With Texas
Radio Massacre International
Dreamies
Kundalini Snakes
Jesu
Exenogenesis
San Agustin
Permanent Fatal Error
Ulan Bator
Shibuzashirazu Orchestra
Moolah
Ben Reynolds
Enmedio
Trans Vita Express
Costin Mierenau
Friends In The Mountains
Darryl Ways' Wolf
Oneida
Landing
Aspects Of Physics
Cotton Casino
Daturah
Sonna
Polmo Polpo
Main
Timonium

thanks

oh man.... first off brother... this a progressive rock site... NOT.. I repeat NOT allmusic.com.  This site is not a career retrospective site...  if someone wants to know about St. Anger.. or the black album... they can go elsewhere.  What this site does is illuminate.. or spotlight progressive rock.. and yes.. .sometimes that music comes from bands that are traditionally known as progressive rock group.  Would you like to have a site where GREAT prog rock albums are not available .. not able to be discussed or reviewed.. made available for discovery.. simply because they are not KNOWN as prog groups.  Ask yourself brother.. why are YOU here... it is for the music... or for the groups.  

Think most of us are in here for the music... 

Some music is entitled to be represented by a certain numerous and extensive bands and thus, genres and trends come to life as music progresses and evolves. 

I agree this isn't the site to check upon the dicogs and bios of bands that might appear as outsiders. But more than agree, I believe that only becasue certain kinds of music related somewhat to mainly prog streams, they shouldn't be called "Prog" or "Prog Related". I hate to say that to incur in misleadings at the time of filing a band under certain genre is very common around here, but the fact of messing up on that matter ain't the central problem, the real issue IS TO BELIEVE THAT ONLY BECAUSE A CERTAIN BAND'S BEEN ADDED TO THE ARCHIVES, THEY IRREMEDIABLY TURN INTO PROG ROCK IN THAT MOMENT.

Like I learned once around here not to point out before knowing, I suggest not to get easily sidetracked and read each other wisely and fairly. That's all I ask.

Cheers,