Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - How prog are Boston?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHow prog are Boston?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Poll Question: How prog do you think the band Boston is?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
1 [2.63%]
0 [0.00%]
20 [52.63%]
17 [44.74%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 13:55
Teaflax wrote:
Quote ^Exactly. And I stand by that, especially since I've proven it time and again without any kind of refutation.
 
Are you sure?
 
In the Negative Prog thread about Kansas you were refuted not only by me, but also by:
 
1.- Masque
2.- Micky
3.- Ghost Rider
4.- Prog Chick
5.- RycheMan
 
And what was your reaction? After a lot of contradictions like admitting they made good music but still were crap for you and mumbling incoherences about pork burgers (Seems you have an obsession with pork Pig) YOU LEFT THE THREAD.
 
Now, if you don't want to  believe me, please check: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=23922&KW=Pork+Burger&PN=4
 
Now you will say yes I can't talk with people that like AOR or you will bring Rap as an issue (a genre about I know almost anything or care), but you were refuted with solid arguments, your answer to arguments was simple as always, kick the chess board and run away in the middle of the night.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - June 26 2006 at 13:56
            
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 14:22
Ivan, I've promised to ignore you, except that that's really difficult to do when you lie unabashedly like that.

No one has refuted the elements of AOR in Kansas in any way whatsoever.

They've either said they can't hear it, that they don't care/it doesn't matter or just that I'm "wrong" (which may be a textbook definition of a refutation, but it's really not worth much when it is not backed up by a shred of fact). Hardly solid arguments, even using the most generous definitions of both words.

Let me pull out two facts, then. You yourself wrote: "If you say rednecks because they add country music influence, you're right" and "They add Hard Rock? Yes, that's also truth".

That you noted that they did the latter to not be considered sissy is not only a hoot and a half, but another feather in my cap, because Prog is never ever about being a posturing Rawk n Roll tough guy.

Therefore, no one has refuted my conclusions nor my methodology; in fact, quite a few people have confirmed it, while supposedly arguing against me. In fact that list is becoming about as long as your list of supposed refuters.

So, I beg you, Ivan, if you'll just do me the small courtesy of not lying, I will do my best to going back to ignoring you.


Edited by Teaflax - June 26 2006 at 14:23
Back to Top
Phil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1881
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 14:26

I saw "Boston" and my first thought was "AOR" and lookey here, there's an argument (sorry discussion) on that very point!!! Think I'll stand back..

 

Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 14:27
This isnt an argument or a discussion.

Its another peeing contest and it is getting really boring.
Thumbs Down
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 15:31
I'm sorry, Tony, but I cannot let lies stand undisputed. I don't mind people calling me names or complaining about my attitude - that's fine. But when you lie about me, you've crossed a line.

Edited by Teaflax - June 26 2006 at 15:31
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 16:04
Originally posted by Teaflax Teaflax wrote:

I'm sorry, Tony, but I cannot let lies stand undisputed. I don't mind people calling me names or complaining about my attitude - that's fine. But when you lie about me, you've crossed a line.


This thread had deteriorated long before anyone disputed who said what about who and why....Wink

I dont like to see the word "lie" in a discussion. There may be misinterpretations,exaggerations,mistaken impressions or even mischievous disinformation,but no one is deliberately and maliciously lying surely?

Smile
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 16:21
I don't see what the problem is anyway ... the poll clearly shows that nobody thinks that Boston is a prog band. What do you mean by "lies", Teaflax? Most people are only complaining about your unfriendly stance, your frequently sarcastic and borderline insulting comments.
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 16:58
I get unfriendly when people mischaracterize what I have written - I think that's only fair.

Of course, it's hard for me to judge whether the misrepresentation of events is deliberate or due to a genuine inability to follow my fairly simple and obvious points.

So, if it's not a lie...well, you do the math.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:03
You get unfriendly whenever someone praises a band that you don't like ... don't you?
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:14
^Nope, not at all. Point me to one example of that, please (and do remember; criticizing something someone else likes doesn't apply).

I get upset when people misuse terminology, because I value communication (it is, after all, the very building block of civilization). I get upset when people do not argue the points made, but instead either slam me for utterly irrelevant things or argue an entirely different line of reasoning. I get upset when empirical points are ignored or claimed to be wrong without a hint of a counter-argument. I get upset when certain Prog heads complain about the state of the charts and how most mainstream music is all crap (and how Prog is sooo much better) and then praise bands that are in many, quite obvious incredibly similar to the artists they deride.

That's all.


Edited by Teaflax - June 26 2006 at 17:14
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:17
The better part of your posts contains some clever arguments and one or two hurtful little comments. Go to the notorious threads (including this one) and read your initial posts where you first say something about the artist in question.
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:36
This is my initial post: 

"AOR bollox. Not Prog, and the continued association in some people's minds is just sad (and points the way to why SB and others are seen as a actual Prog bands)."

What hurtful little comment is in there? It's directed first at the band, who I think is almost unspeakably awful, and then I draw the not entirely far-fetched conclusion that their wide acceptance here explains - at least in part - why AOR/Soft Rock is rarely remarked upon as being a stand-out part of a Prog-related band's compositional style.

Where is the insult?
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:39
Originally posted by Teaflax Teaflax wrote:


Originally posted by RycheMan RycheMan wrote:


Whats in the charts? Britney Spears, Madonna, Hip Hop, Rap, Eminem etc

I don´t think you can compare Boston to that lot.
Do you honestly think that there's that huge a compositional difference between a Boston song and a Britney or Madonna song?


Indeed there is - but it kinda depends on the boundaries you set.

In this case, "Papa Don't Preach" does not begin with a rather tasty organ intro that builds up into swathes of rich and multilayered guitar... oh yes, I'm talking about arrangement.

But the intro grows from a little germ of an idea - it develops.

And that's the main difference between the two songs under scrutiny here - apart from the fact that Foreplay/Long Time is a pair of songs that meld together - the one growing out of the other, to extend the metaphor...

It's a cannily written song - but, I concede, a song, nonetheless.

Originally posted by Teaflax Teaflax wrote:


Aiming for the lowest common denominator with cadence-based repetitive, short and simple melody lines over regular harmonies is the name of the game.


That would rule out most of Rockdom.

To use those broad brushstrokes, many, many songs by Genesis, Yes and Gentle Giant are out.

You must be a huge fan of Meshuggah, Tangerine Dream and Can
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:43
Originally posted by Teaflax Teaflax wrote:

This is my initial post: 

"AOR bollox. Not Prog, and the continued association in some people's minds is just sad (and points the way to why SB and others are seen as a actual Prog bands)."

What hurtful little comment is in there? It's directed first at the band, who I think is almost unspeakably awful, and then I draw the not entirely far-fetched conclusion that their wide acceptance here explains - at least in part - why AOR/Soft Rock is rarely remarked upon as being a stand-out part of a Prog-related band's compositional style.

Where is the insult?


1. "AOR bollox". 'nuff said.
2. Connecting Boston and SB is ridiculous. You may do it, but in doing so you insult SB fans. Remember: It's undisputed that SB have AOR influences. But that doesn't make them an AOR band. It doesn't mean that they're similar to Boston.
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:44
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:


To use those broad brushstrokes, many, many songs by Genesis, Yes and Gentle Giant are out.
Since they all have back catalogues full of lame music (especially Yes), that's not even a contentious statement.
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:55
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:


1. "AOR bollox". 'nuff said.
No, not "nuff said". Not at all.

If I say I hate broccoli, do you take horrible offence because you love broccoli? I would really hope not.

So, why would you - or anyone that isn't Tom Scholtz et cohortes take umbrage at me describing what I feel them to be? Please explain that to me in some terms other than "because I say so".
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:


2. Connecting Boston and SB is ridiculous. You may do it, but in doing so you insult SB fans. Remember: It's undisputed that SB have AOR influences. But that doesn't make them an AOR band. It doesn't mean that they're similar to Boston.
If they have AOR influences, and Boston is an AOR band (the AOR band, many would say), how could there not be similarities?

And, pray tell, why is it an insult? At most, it could be one if you happen to think that Boston suck and you love SB - even then you'd have to be incredibly thin-skinned to take it as a personal insult rather than just a fallacy.

In the latter case, you would have to argue why what I have identified numerous times as clear US Radio Rock influences in Spock's Beard's music isn't that kind of influence, but rather somethign else (moot in your case, since you've admitted to it being a notable component of their sound).

The fact that people do get insulted could of course be taken as me having hit a nerve. That certainly makes more sense than getting all huffy because some Swedish asshole with too much time on his hands doesn't like the same bands you like.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 18:19
Originally posted by Teaflax Teaflax wrote:

Ivan, I've promised to ignore you, except that that's really difficult to do when you lie unabashedly like that.

No one has refuted the elements of AOR in Kansas in any way whatsoever.
 
Nobody???? I saw at least 6, members giving you arguments that you systematically ignored, when names of tracks were  mentioned and structures described you had to accept it:
 
Teaflax wrote:
Quote So, sorry, while there are certainly many elements that are Pure Prog about Kansas, they will always be a Pork Burger to me.
 
 
So you admited that they have elemnts not of Prog, but of PURE PROG, but still they are a pork burger TO YOU.
 
We all have to accept what you say as the law, not because you gave solid arguments, but only because THEY WILL ALWAYS BE A PORK BURGER TO YOU


They've either said they can't hear it, that they don't care/it doesn't matter or just that I'm "wrong" (which may be a textbook definition of a refutation, but it's really not worth much when it is not backed up by a shred of fact). Hardly solid arguments, even using the most generous definitions of both words.
 
Well, your terms to describe the music of Kansas are not only inaccurate but offensive and xenophobic, like PORK BURGER or REDNECK PROG.
 
Very precise. LOL


Let me pull out two facts, then. You yourself wrote: "If you say rednecks because they add country music influence, you're right" and "They add Hard Rock? Yes, that's also truth".
 
Seems you don't understand sarcasm.
 
Redneck is a term referred to an ignorant white person generaly from the south of USA, but you use this term only becausecthey add their folk music to Rock, that's not being redneck, that's being coherent with their inheritance, like it or not Country music is part of the inheritance of USA musicians.
 
If Strawbs or Jethro Tull add British Folk to their albums, it's artoistic but if a band like Kansas does the same with their own music, then they are rednecks...Is being proud of the history of a country only a priviledege of people from Europe?

That you noted that they did the latter to not be considered sissy is not only a hoot and a half, but another feather in my cap, because Prog is never ever about being a posturing Rawk n Roll tough guy.
 
When I talk about tough or Hard music I'm talking about heir personal apparience, they used long hair looked tough and played some hard rock, and this is OK, it's their style, that's nothing to be ashamed of, all Prog Metal musicians look tough and play hard rock or metal also and nobody doubts Dream Theater or Symphony X (Despite I don't like their music) are two Prog bands.

Therefore, no one has refuted my conclusions nor my methodology; in fact, quite a few people have confirmed it, while supposedly arguing against me. In fact that list is becoming about as long as your list of supposed refuters.
 
Arguments? What arguments? You have never talked about structures, style, influences or anything.
 
Methodology? Wjat methodology? You only shout AOR, Redneck Prog and Pork Burger demanding us o accept it as the Holy Grail of Prog, but there's no method or argument, just your word that we have to accept.

So, I beg you, Ivan, if you'll just do me the small courtesy of not lying, I will do my best to going back to ignoring you.
 
I'm not lying, I included a link to your posts, youstarted it and when things didn't came the way you wanted you ran away.
 
And please, don't try to appear as a victim, you have ´pissed more people here than nobody else, if I piss one person it might be his/her fault, oif I piss two, three, four or maybe I'm unlucky, but if I piss at least ten or twenty members as you have done, you must search who is responsible,

 
Tony: This is not a contedst of any kind, I only started to argue with Teaflax because I'm tired of wstching how he enjoys bashing and humilliating people because they like something he doesn't.
 
You don't believe me? Read what Teaflax said in this last post:
 
Quote Ivan, I've promised to ignore you, except that that's really difficult to do when you lie unabashedly like that.
 
Lie unbashedly????...that's evident, bashing people is his purpose, if we don't agree with him we're lying and for that reason deserve to be bashed, but I propved with a link that he abandoned the Kansas thread when he ran out of arguments, but again he ignores that part, doesn't even mentions that.
 
Teaflax is not happy when he has made a point (That some times does) but he wants the other person to feel bad, if you like Kansas, Boston, Meatloaf or Spock's Beard you're an ignorant, an hipocrite, but if you dare to don't like anything he likes then you are..... What a coincidence, you're also an ignorant.
 
Most of us are here for a long time because we enjoy having a good debate but with respect, personally I had heated debates about Religion and Politics with Sean and Trotsky for 5, 6 or even 10 pages, but you couldn't find a single offense or an attempt to make the other person feel uncomfortable.
 
Some time ago you told mne not to enjoy giving arguments to destroy other person's position, and I undestood it, even when I was giving ARGUMENTS AND FACTS.
 
Now we are before a person who systematically joins every negative thread and bashes all the persons who dare to disagree with him.
 
I respect your position as I always did and always will do, but honestly, people wants to feel comfortable and post with confidence among friends.
 
We come here to relax, not to be afraid of a person going to insult you and enjoy it so much.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - June 26 2006 at 18:20
            
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 18:27
*Yawn* You win, Ivan. There is no reason to argue with someone who doesn't even know what he's arguing about. Please refrain from commenting on my posts or making statements about my opinions, and I will give you the same courtesy from now on.

Bye now, Ivan.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 18:28
hahahha
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2006 at 18:36
The wall being suitably drenched and bladders emptied,I am finally fed up of sitting here getting splashed..............
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.