How prog are Boston? |
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Author | |||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 13:55 | ||
Teaflax wrote:
Are you sure?
In the Negative Prog thread about Kansas you were refuted not only by me, but also by:
1.- Masque
2.- Micky
3.- Ghost Rider
4.- Prog Chick
5.- RycheMan
And what was your reaction? After a lot of contradictions like admitting they made good music but still were crap for you and mumbling incoherences about pork burgers (Seems you have an obsession with pork ) YOU LEFT THE THREAD.
Now, if you don't want to believe me, please check: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=23922&KW=Pork+Burger&PN=4
Now you will say yes I can't talk with people that like AOR or you will bring Rap as an issue (a genre about I know almost anything or care), but you were refuted with solid arguments, your answer to arguments was simple as always, kick the chess board and run away in the middle of the night.
Iván Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - June 26 2006 at 13:56 |
|||
|
|||
Teaflax
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 26 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1225 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 14:22 | ||
Ivan, I've promised to ignore you, except that that's really difficult to do when you lie unabashedly like that.
No one has refuted the elements of AOR in Kansas in any way whatsoever. They've either said they can't hear it, that they don't care/it doesn't matter or just that I'm "wrong" (which may be a textbook definition of a refutation, but it's really not worth much when it is not backed up by a shred of fact). Hardly solid arguments, even using the most generous definitions of both words. Let me pull out two facts, then. You yourself wrote: "If you say rednecks because they add country music influence, you're right" and "They add Hard Rock? Yes, that's also truth". That you noted that they did the latter to not be considered sissy is not only a hoot and a half, but another feather in my cap, because Prog is never ever about being a posturing Rawk n Roll tough guy. Therefore, no one has refuted my conclusions nor my methodology; in fact, quite a few people have confirmed it, while supposedly arguing against me. In fact that list is becoming about as long as your list of supposed refuters. So, I beg you, Ivan, if you'll just do me the small courtesy of not lying, I will do my best to going back to ignoring you. Edited by Teaflax - June 26 2006 at 14:23 |
|||
|
|||
Phil
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 17 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1881 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 14:26 | ||
I saw "Boston" and my first thought was "AOR" and lookey here, there's an argument (sorry discussion) on that very point!!! Think I'll stand back..
|
|||
Tony R
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: July 16 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 11979 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 14:27 | ||
This isnt an argument or a discussion.
Its another peeing contest and it is getting really boring. |
|||
Teaflax
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 26 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1225 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 15:31 | ||
I'm sorry, Tony, but I cannot let lies stand undisputed. I don't mind
people calling me names or complaining about my attitude - that's fine. But when you lie about me, you've crossed a line.
Edited by Teaflax - June 26 2006 at 15:31 |
|||
|
|||
Tony R
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: July 16 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 11979 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 16:04 | ||
This thread had deteriorated long before anyone disputed who said what about who and why.... I dont like to see the word "lie" in a discussion. There may be misinterpretations,exaggerations,mistaken impressions or even mischievous disinformation,but no one is deliberately and maliciously lying surely? |
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21119 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 16:21 | ||
I don't see what the problem is anyway ... the poll clearly shows that nobody thinks that Boston is a prog band. What do you mean by "lies", Teaflax? Most people are only complaining about your unfriendly stance, your frequently sarcastic and borderline insulting comments.
|
|||
Teaflax
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 26 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1225 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 16:58 | ||
I get unfriendly when people mischaracterize what I have written - I think that's only fair.
Of course, it's hard for me to judge whether the misrepresentation of events is deliberate or due to a genuine inability to follow my fairly simple and obvious points. So, if it's not a lie...well, you do the math. |
|||
|
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21119 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:03 | ||
You get unfriendly whenever someone praises a band that you don't like ... don't you?
|
|||
Teaflax
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 26 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1225 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:14 | ||
^Nope, not at all. Point me to one example of that, please (and do
remember; criticizing something someone else likes doesn't apply).
I get upset when people misuse terminology, because I value communication (it is, after all, the very building block of civilization). I get upset when people do not argue the points made, but instead either slam me for utterly irrelevant things or argue an entirely different line of reasoning. I get upset when empirical points are ignored or claimed to be wrong without a hint of a counter-argument. I get upset when certain Prog heads complain about the state of the charts and how most mainstream music is all crap (and how Prog is sooo much better) and then praise bands that are in many, quite obvious incredibly similar to the artists they deride. That's all. Edited by Teaflax - June 26 2006 at 17:14 |
|||
|
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21119 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:17 | ||
The better part of your posts contains some clever arguments and one or two hurtful little comments. Go to the notorious threads (including this one) and read your initial posts where you first say something about the artist in question.
|
|||
Teaflax
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 26 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1225 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:36 | ||
This is my initial post:
"AOR bollox. Not Prog, and the continued association in some people's minds is just sad (and points the way to why SB and others are seen as a actual Prog bands)." What hurtful little comment is in there? It's directed first at the band, who I think is almost unspeakably awful, and then I draw the not entirely far-fetched conclusion that their wide acceptance here explains - at least in part - why AOR/Soft Rock is rarely remarked upon as being a stand-out part of a Prog-related band's compositional style. Where is the insult? |
|||
|
|||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:39 | ||
Indeed there is - but it kinda depends on the boundaries you set. In this case, "Papa Don't Preach" does not begin with a rather tasty organ intro that builds up into swathes of rich and multilayered guitar... oh yes, I'm talking about arrangement. But the intro grows from a little germ of an idea - it develops. And that's the main difference between the two songs under scrutiny here - apart from the fact that Foreplay/Long Time is a pair of songs that meld together - the one growing out of the other, to extend the metaphor... It's a cannily written song - but, I concede, a song, nonetheless.
That would rule out most of Rockdom. To use those broad brushstrokes, many, many songs by Genesis, Yes and Gentle Giant are out. You must be a huge fan of Meshuggah, Tangerine Dream and Can |
|||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21119 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:43 | ||
1. "AOR bollox". 'nuff said. 2. Connecting Boston and SB is ridiculous. You may do it, but in doing so you insult SB fans. Remember: It's undisputed that SB have AOR influences. But that doesn't make them an AOR band. It doesn't mean that they're similar to Boston. |
|||
Teaflax
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 26 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1225 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:44 | ||
|
|||
|
|||
Teaflax
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 26 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1225 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 17:55 | ||
If I say I hate broccoli, do you take horrible offence because you love broccoli? I would really hope not. So, why would you - or anyone that isn't Tom Scholtz et cohortes take umbrage at me describing what I feel them to be? Please explain that to me in some terms other than "because I say so".
And, pray tell, why is it an insult? At most, it could be one if you happen to think that Boston suck and you love SB - even then you'd have to be incredibly thin-skinned to take it as a personal insult rather than just a fallacy. In the latter case, you would have to argue why what I have identified numerous times as clear US Radio Rock influences in Spock's Beard's music isn't that kind of influence, but rather somethign else (moot in your case, since you've admitted to it being a notable component of their sound). The fact that people do get insulted could of course be taken as me having hit a nerve. That certainly makes more sense than getting all huffy because some Swedish asshole with too much time on his hands doesn't like the same bands you like. |
|||
|
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 18:19 | ||
Tony: This is not a contedst of any kind, I only started to argue with Teaflax because I'm tired of wstching how he enjoys bashing and humilliating people because they like something he doesn't.
You don't believe me? Read what Teaflax said in this last post:
Lie unbashedly????...that's evident, bashing people is his purpose, if we don't agree with him we're lying and for that reason deserve to be bashed, but I propved with a link that he abandoned the Kansas thread when he ran out of arguments, but again he ignores that part, doesn't even mentions that.
Teaflax is not happy when he has made a point (That some times does) but he wants the other person to feel bad, if you like Kansas, Boston, Meatloaf or Spock's Beard you're an ignorant, an hipocrite, but if you dare to don't like anything he likes then you are..... What a coincidence, you're also an ignorant.
Most of us are here for a long time because we enjoy having a good debate but with respect, personally I had heated debates about Religion and Politics with Sean and Trotsky for 5, 6 or even 10 pages, but you couldn't find a single offense or an attempt to make the other person feel uncomfortable.
Some time ago you told mne not to enjoy giving arguments to destroy other person's position, and I undestood it, even when I was giving ARGUMENTS AND FACTS.
Now we are before a person who systematically joins every negative thread and bashes all the persons who dare to disagree with him.
I respect your position as I always did and always will do, but honestly, people wants to feel comfortable and post with confidence among friends.
We come here to relax, not to be afraid of a person going to insult you and enjoy it so much.
Iván Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - June 26 2006 at 18:20 |
|||
|
|||
Teaflax
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 26 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1225 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 18:27 | ||
*Yawn* You win, Ivan. There is no reason to argue with someone who
doesn't even know what he's arguing about. Please refrain from
commenting on my posts or making statements about my opinions, and I
will give you the same courtesy from now on.
Bye now, Ivan. |
|||
|
|||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46833 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 18:28 | ||
hahahha
|
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
Tony R
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: July 16 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 11979 |
Posted: June 26 2006 at 18:36 | ||
The wall being suitably drenched and bladders emptied,I am finally fed up of sitting here getting splashed..............
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |