Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Recommendations/Featured albums
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Led Zeppelin?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedLed Zeppelin?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2005 at 07:24
Yes i also feel that it was alot easier to add artists in the past...however i think only proto-prog artists should be the artists that would inspire the truly progressive artists of the 70's
Back to Top
dima_olkov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 23 2005
Location: Russian Federation
Status: Offline
Points: 143
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2005 at 07:50
Pardon my ignorance, but how many people decide for a new band in the archives???
PF, Genesis, KC, Yes, VdGG, GG, Camel, Jethro Tull
Back to Top
rockandrail View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 22 2005
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 310
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2005 at 07:59

Led Zeppelin is a lot more progressive than any so called progressive metal bands. Accepting dozens of five stars reviews of something like Octavarium and refusing any Led Zeppelin is just a silly joke.

 

Pierre R, the man who lost his signature
Back to Top
Andrea Cortese View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 05 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 4411
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2005 at 08:20
Originally posted by Citanul Citanul wrote:

Originally posted by Andrea Cortese Andrea Cortese wrote:

Also the historic prog bands had had non prog albums (Yes and Genesis, for example, not VdGG, nor Peter Hammill!).

So to be absolutely correct we should remove all their albums that is difficult to fit in the prog category!



But Yes and Genesis have a significant proportion of their output that is clearly prog.  Therefore they are included here.  Of course the question arises as to what constitutes a "significant proportion", but feel that Led Zeppelin don't have it.

This is the point, Citanul. Smile

What does constitute "significant proportion"? The expression itself, is only a subjective estimation. Many have tried to make an objective and valid so called "progometer", but miserely failed.

That "significant proportion" you're talking about, would, in your words, give the right to include all the discography of a band...It's exactly what I'm saying about Led Zeppelin, Blue Oyster Cult and Doors!Wink



Edited by Andrea Cortese
Back to Top
Zitro View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: July 11 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1321
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2005 at 08:22

the proggiest led zeppelin song has to be 'How Many More Times' from the first album. The eerie middle section is one of the most original and strangest compositions of the late 60s for me.

Led Zeppelin is very progressive indeed ... proto-prog metal but it probably doesn't sound very 'prog-like' like the bands listed in this site.

 

putting led zeppelin is like putting Jimi Hendrix, Neil Young or the Beatles.

 

PS : Why isn't Al Dimeola here?? (virtuosic prog classical jazz-fusion)



Edited by Zitro
Back to Top
dima_olkov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 23 2005
Location: Russian Federation
Status: Offline
Points: 143
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2005 at 08:34

I agree about Al Di Meola... that is really really strange...

maybe we should create another thread about him

PF, Genesis, KC, Yes, VdGG, GG, Camel, Jethro Tull
Back to Top
Citanul View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 14 2005
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 430
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2005 at 08:43
Originally posted by Andrea Cortese Andrea Cortese wrote:

Originally posted by Citanul Citanul wrote:

Originally posted by Andrea Cortese Andrea Cortese wrote:

Also the historic prog bands had had non prog albums (Yes and Genesis, for example, not VdGG, nor Peter Hammill!).

So to be absolutely correct we should remove all their albums that is difficult to fit in the prog category!



But Yes and Genesis have a significant proportion of their output that is clearly prog.  Therefore they are included here.  Of course the question arises as to what constitutes a "significant proportion", but feel that Led Zeppelin don't have it.

This is the point, Citanul. Smile

What does constitute "significant proportion"? The expression itself, is only a subjective estimation. Many have tried to make an objective and valid so called "progometer", but miserely failed.

That "significant proportion" you're talking about, would, in your words, give the right to include all the discography of a band...It's exactly what I'm saying about Led Zeppelin, Blue Oyster Cult and Doors!Wink



Well, I think you should include the whole discography, otherwise you get into arguments as to which albums should be left out.  And you're right about it being subjective.  You think Zeppelin should be here, and I think that they shouldn't (although I'm not going to complain about it if they do get included at some point).  That's why we now have the Band Admissions Team to make these decisions for us.
Be or be not. There is no question. - Yoda, Prince of Denmark
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2005 at 08:52
I am astounded how many people approve of their inclusion.


Back to Top
PROGMAN View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 03 2004
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 2664
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2005 at 08:56
Prog Releted??
CYMRU AM BYTH
Back to Top
eduardossc View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 257
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2005 at 09:19

Oh please ¡¡. If people keep looking for bands to be included in this site for making a few songs "out of the ordinary". Which in fact are nothing but quality songs, one day we´ll be reading on every band in history with the single exception of "The Ramones".

 Stop wondering ¡¡¡. That´s why we have now Purple, Uriah heep, Queen and many more that once wrote a song with a shine of creativity. Each genre received a name for a reason.

 Dude #1.-  "Ey ¡¡¡. Did you listen to that?...WOW ¡¡, that was a 9/6 signature (Or whatever, I don´t understand music that well), right there from minute 2:35 to 2:39....could this be prog?

 Dude #2 thinking.- "What?, I could not say"  saying.- "Yeah it was great. this should be prog"

 Dude #3.- "Have you heard this new prog band ?, they are really amazing, their music has every single prog element"

 Dude #15,000.- "Should The white stripes be in prog archives?"

 Prog archives´ overall list in 3 years from now: "White stripes # 29" (Above Zarathustra) 

 

Back to Top
Andrea Cortese View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 05 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 4411
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2005 at 09:52
Originally posted by eduardossc eduardossc wrote:

Oh please ¡¡. If people keep looking for bands to be included in this site for making a few songs "out of the ordinary". Which in fact are nothing but quality songs, one day we´ll be reading on every band in history with the single exception of "The Ramones".

 Stop wondering ¡¡¡. That´s why we have now Purple, Uriah heep, Queen and many more that once wrote a song with a shine of creativity. Each genre received a name for a reason.

 Dude #1.-  "Ey ¡¡¡. Did you listen to that?...WOW ¡¡, that was a 9/6 signature (Or whatever, I don´t understand music that well), right there from minute 2:35 to 2:39....could this be prog?

 Dude #2 thinking.- "What?, I could not say"  saying.- "Yeah it was great. this should be prog"

 Dude #3.- "Have you heard this new prog band ?, they are really amazing, their music has every single prog element"

 Dude #15,000.- "Should The white stripes be in prog archives?"

 Prog archives´ overall list in 3 years from now: "White stripes # 29" (Above Zarathustra) 

 

...Dude # 100.000...think M@x would be so happy...!!!!

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.258 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.