very interesting video about the JFK assassination

I always had my doubts about the Warren report, and I just found this very interesting video:

Thanks for uploading it. I saw the first 10 minutes. This is a case I've been interested for over 20 years. It took me a couple of years to read the fictional Warren Report, which is mostly exhausting physically.

I think LBJ was an accessory after the fact. I definitely think E. Howard Hunt was involved. But I believe Alan Dulles was probably the mastermind, or one of them. He was the CIA director who JFK fired. And then he helps with the investigation? Gerald Ford was a spy for J. Edgar Hoover. Arlen Spector created the "Magic Bullet Theory" nonsense. They let Oswald get shot on live TV with 21 Dallas police officers guarding him - 22 if you count Jack Ruby, a bag-man for the mob.

Hours of the FBI interrogating Oswald.. No recording? No transcript? Bullsh*t. Humes burns his original autopsy notes.

I think this had to do with the CIA's insistence to f**k with the USSR, Cuba, and Vietnam. In one of JFK's memorandums, (there's also video of this) it clearly says all Americans will be out in 65', advisers, included (maybe even the death squads in 61' that Bertrand Russell wrote about).

A lot of other weird things. Including the HSCA which started good and still uncovered information, but Richard A. Sprague didn't want anyone from the CIA investigating. He was forced to re-sign, and then G. Robert Blakey was able to edit.

It's also interesting to read the letters between the investigators, and how some people allowed personal hang-ups to lose steam, and you had competition instead of cooperation. Long after Mark Lane's book/video. Jim Garrison is not represented well in that piece of sh*t "jfk" (who also made the piece of sh*t "the doors") - just watch him on video for yourself.

I could on about this forever, so I'll just post a couple of videos and if this thread gains traction, I'll try to keep my eye on it.

The main problem with what people think today of investigations back in the 60's is, we only have today's references to go by. You have to put yourself into the 60's methods and processes of investigation, which by today's standards are archaic and elementary, basically WTF!!!???

The Zapruder film is really the only evidence that exists that can clearly state where the bullets came from, not who pulled the trigger but where they came from based on the head kill shots.

Oswald pulled the trigger and hit JFK, but I also believe there was a backup plan to make sure JFK was shot dead, from the grassy knoll, wooden fence, bridge or another building window by Dallas police, FBI, Secret Service a military sniper hire....who knows. But for me I can't agree that Oswald did it all.

Everything after that afternoon was completely botched by today's standards, the natural chaos of the whole thing was more than enough smoke to create so much confusion for excuses. The murder of Oswald was a complete stage, but again when you think about the security back then to today anybody could have been in that area without ever being checked. By staged I mean the police wanted as much media attention as they could allow, anybody that said "I'm a TV, radio, paper reporter..." was probably let in so everyone could see that they got the "killer".

You have to put yourself in the 60's mind set of police investigations and I think it might be different. The Warren report is useless, I've never read any of it, probably reading the IRS tax codes would be a more interesting read.

What the JFK movie did was to open peoples eyes up about a possible cover up as well that Oswald was not alone in what happened.