Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Man Overboard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 07 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 3830
|
Topic: Would you rather... (tough question) Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:14 |
Now this is a tough one.
Okay, you have a choice with two options.
You are guaranteed to live for 100 more years, in good health, without aging.
You can:
a) Listen ONLY to music written/recorded in the past 100
years. The cutoff date is TODAY. You will never hear
anything outside of that period, nor will you hear about it or read
about it. Basically, music ceases to exist with the exception of
the past 100 years.
b) Listen ONLY to music made from now until 100 years in the
future. The start date is TODAY. You will have no memory of
previous music, only the music that exists from today, onward.
These choices only impact you. Forthcoming artists will still be
influenced by past artists and put out the music they'd put out anyway,
should you choose the latter.
Can you decide?
|
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:19 |
I'd choose to live a normal life, for another year hopefully longer and listen to whatever will be released and have been released
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:19 |
Yes I can and the answer is A - the last 100 years.
Why? Because there is already HUGE amount made from that time period
that I know and love (and a lot I've yet to discover but no doubt will
too). The future is uncertain... it could be good, it could be
atrocious, but at least with 1905-2005 I know I'm guarenteed a
staggering amount of good music.
I'm not a prog fan who loathes modern prog, far from it, but I'd still
like to play safe on this one and go with what I know I love.
|
|
Man Overboard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 07 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 3830
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:20 |
Tuxon: YOU ARE NOT GIVEN THAT CHOICE! WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW?
Edited by Man Overboard
|
|
undefinability
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 208
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:26 |
I don't know, probably option A. Although I am very interested in what's to become of this genus, I could never think about abandoning my current collection.
|
"Don't listen to me."
[IMG]http://www.freewebs.com/shahath/shadowid.jpg">
|
|
Dragon Phoenix
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 31 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 1475
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:31 |
A, without question. The same reason as Trouserpress gave.
|
|
Man Overboard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 07 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 3830
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:32 |
After much debate, and it absolutely kills me to do this...
I'm going to have to choose B. Our progressive pioneers certainly "chose B" in their own way.
Now don't get me wrong, I love the early progressive rock more than anything else, but...
The music that interests me the most comes from the past 40
years. The previous 60 gave me little to love, except jazz.
However, I'm willing to risk it all to see what's coming in the next
100. Considering even the "new" prog bands are either peaked or
close to peaking, I'd be losing that just as much as I'd be losing King
Crimson, Yes, Genesis, and other favorites. But.. who knows
what's to come?
|
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:34 |
Option A, plesae I can't live without "Tales from Topografic oceans"
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:37 |
I'm gonna live dangerous and go B!................Hey what happened to the stereo!
|
|
|
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:38 |
What I'd say is a far more interesting poser is:
A) Would you stick with buying music from the last 100 years and never
have the option of buying ANY albums released after today.
or...
B) Would you keep what you have from the last 100 years and NEVER GET
ANYTHING ELSE FROM THAT PERIOD, instead relying on new releases for all
future music purchases.
Now that's a tough one.
|
|
Man Overboard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 07 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 3830
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:39 |
Trouser: Did you freaking read my mind? That was the
original question I had turning over in my head, I ended up deciding to
make it infinitely harder... a double-or-nothing, so to
speak.
|
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:40 |
But I don't want to live for another 100 years, oh the agony of having to deal with this earthly hell for another 100 years
But if the choise have to be made I'd choose the latter. All new music, I also like to live dangerously
Edited by tuxon
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:40 |
|
|
nacho
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 18 2004
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 521
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:43 |
Both choices leave J.S. Bach out! I don't want to live anymore!!!
|
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:44 |
Trouserpress wrote:
What I'd say is a far more interesting poser is:
A) Would you stick with buying music from the last 100 years and never have the option of buying ANY albums released after today.
or...
B) Would you keep what you have from the last 100 years and NEVER GET ANYTHING ELSE FROM THAT PERIOD, instead relying on new releases for all future music purchases.
Now that's a tough one.
|
I'm gonna surprise everyone here. I would go for option "B" in this case
|
|
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 08:46 |
|
|
JCProg
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 03 2004
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 115
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 09:00 |
Man Overboard wrote:
b) Listen ONLY to music made from now until 100 years in the future. The start date is TODAY. You will have no memory of previous music, only the music that exists from today, onward. |
If I have no memory of previous music, I can't really miss anything, can I? So, I choose B.
|
|
barbs
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 04 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 562
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 09:04 |
I'd take the last 100. Even though I'd miss out on anything new (some
people say there is nothing new under the sun anyway) I really believe
that we have lived through the greatest changes we are going to see. So
much music today is derivative and thats not to say that someone cannot
be original, however it stands to reason that everyone does what Isaac
Newton recognised in science and mathematics, when he said that 'if I
have seen further it is because I have stood on the shoulders of
giants.' He was just recognising and respecting the work that had come
before. The 'giants' of prog rock owe alot to the forefathers of their
musical era as well.
Anyway I would be happy to regurgitate an already abundant supply of
music cause I like blues, jazz, symphprog, progmetal etc.
Have you ever heard Aaron Neville sing Ave Maria. It is a sublime
experience. Anita Baker, Miles Davis, Mr John,
john coltrane, sonny rollins. Everything from Yes, to Dead Soul Tribe.
I love DT and PT stuff as well as Muse. So I am a happy camper right
now. I think we have truly been blessed and yep a renaissance of sorts
in the last ten years.
Besides, you never said anything about making your own music and I sing
and play acc guitar and piano so, if I ever get bored with listening
for awhile, I can do that.
Edited by barbs
|
Eternity
|
|
MorgothSunshine
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 03 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 298
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 09:12 |
JCProg wrote:
Man Overboard wrote:
b) Listen ONLY to music made from now until 100 years in the future. The start date is TODAY. You will have no memory of previous music, only the music that exists from today, onward. |
If I have no memory of previous music, I can't really miss anything, can I? So, I choose B. |
Correct answer!
|
For every truth even the contrary is true...
|
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group
|
Posted: June 05 2005 at 09:24 |
barbs wrote:
I'd take the last 100. Even though I'd miss out on anything new (some people say there is nothing new under the sun anyway) I really believe that we have lived through the greatest changes we are going to see. So much music today is derivative and thats not to say that someone cannot be original, however it stands to reason that everyone does what Isaac Newton recognised in science and mathematics, when he said that 'if I have seen further it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants.' He was just recognising and respecting the work that had come before. The 'giants' of prog rock owe alot to the forefathers of their musical era as well.
Anyway I would be happy to regurgitate an already abundant supply of music cause I like blues, jazz, symphprog, progmetal etc. Have you ever heard Aaron Neville sing Ave Maria. It is a sublime experience. Anita Baker, Miles Davis, Mr John, john coltrane, sonny rollins. Everything from Yes, to Dead Soul Tribe. I love DT and PT stuff as well as Muse. So I am a happy camper right now. I think we have truly been blessed and yep a renaissance of sorts in the last ten years.
Besides, you never said anything about making your own music and I sing and play acc guitar and piano so, if I ever get bored with listening for awhile, I can do that. |
Brave
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.