Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Why are there 3 Progressive Metal categories?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhy are there 3 Progressive Metal categories?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Squonkman View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 08 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Why are there 3 Progressive Metal categories?
    Posted: April 15 2008 at 18:32
progressive metal, extreme tech/progressive metal........and experimental/post metal.
 
Why can't this stuff fit under the umbrella of progressive metal as subgenres?
I think one can get carried away with overcategorizing everything. I mean, I already have a hard time with calling some of these metal bands progressive in the first place---in many cases you could make a case that they are regressive. And how is death metal progressive? can someone really explain that one? At a certain point, if its all grunting and sludge metal, is it really progressive?
 
I'm all for a big tent, but we also have to be careful about keeping progressive music as an electic arena of music, and not home to every shouting thrash playing maniac who comes along and sings songs about the devil.


Edited by Squonkman - April 15 2008 at 19:08
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35951
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 18:37
I like the split because it's helped me better to find similar bands that I enjoy, but it should be subcategories (with Prog Metal as a master-heading) but the site software made such implementation problematic.

There are bands that draw on death metal that I find very progressive.
Back to Top
laplace View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 06 2005
Location: popupControl();
Status: Offline
Points: 7606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 18:39
Originally posted by Squonkman Squonkman wrote:

progressive metal, extreme tech/progressive metal........now I hear people talking about experimental metal.

Why can't this stuff fit under the umbrella of progressive metal as subgenres?

I think one can get carried away with overcategorizing everything. I mean, I already have a hard time with calling some of these metal bands progressive in the first place---in many cases you could make a case that they are regressive. And how is death metal progressive? can someone really explain that one? At a certain point, if its all grunting and sludge metal, is it really progressive?


I'm all for a big tent, but we also have to be careful about keeping progressive music as an electic arena of music, and not home to every shouting thrash playing maniac who comes along and sings songs about the devil.


I'm not on the prog team, or any really, but I listen to everything to keep my negative opinions relevant... o:)

The split between extreme and melodic exists because they're poles apart - quiet possibly just as far apart as Neo and raga-prog - and received by very distinct sets of fans. A lot of modern melodic metal occupies a musical position that's just a little bit more raucous than Motorhead (so if you want to complain about genre overlap then it's Heavy Prog -> Prog Metal that should be a bigger concern), while a lot of the extreme stuff is, as you say, all grunting and rhythmic acrobatics.

also, you did make a few assumptions/stereotypes in reference to extreme metal. I can see that they're jokes but prepare for people with less functioning funny bones to put your definitions through the wringer instead of answering your question =P
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35951
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 18:41
You should check out this topic:
Announcing the Prog-Metal split

And there are three categories:




Edited by Logan - April 15 2008 at 18:46
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 18:48
you're saying two things;  you think ProgMetal should be in one category, and that much metal here is not progressive.. they're separate issues, but--  the Progmetal split was deemed useful to users and new people to Prog (as laplace points out), keep in mind ExtremeTech has been a legitimate genre for several years and often attracts a different listener, same for Exp/Post Metal, and the listener can then be clear about where to look for what interests them

..and as for your opinion of what is ProgMetal or not, that's a long road I'd rather not take






Edited by Atavachron - April 15 2008 at 18:49
Back to Top
Squonkman View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 08 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 19:07
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

You should check out this topic:
Announcing the Prog-Metal split

And there are three categories:


 
 
you are right---I missed that. its even worse than I thought. I will have to edit my thread title.
 
Still don't see why it can't fit under the umbrella Prog metal, with the other two as subcategories. I will go back and read the thread.
 
I am a big Porcupine Tree and Riverside fan, so its not like I don't like some hard driving progressive metal, if it carries with it the hallmarks of what progressive music is all about. But I hear too many pedestrian bands that do little more than shout, grunt and play almost unlistenable sludge thrash metal that has been done over and over, by many better bands, for a long time, being thrown into this "progressive metal' umbrella. If you aren't doing something beyond what Sabbath and their progeny etc already has done, I think we have to be careful about making this too much of a metal site and less of a progressive rock site.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 19:11
* munch munch munch* LOL
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Proletariat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1882
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 19:28
Originally posted by Squonkman Squonkman wrote:

progressive metal, extreme tech/progressive metal........and experimental/post metal.
 
Why can't this stuff fit under the umbrella of progressive metal as subgenres?
I think one can get carried away with overcategorizing everything. I mean, I already have a hard time with calling some of these metal bands progressive in the first place---in many cases you could make a case that they are regressive. And how is death metal progressive? can someone really explain that one? At a certain point, if its all grunting and sludge metal, is it really progressive?
 
I'm all for a big tent, but we also have to be careful about keeping progressive music as an electic arena of music, and not home to every shouting thrash playing maniac who comes along and sings songs about the devil.
I agree that they could still fit under one umbrella but they are good seperate because of the number of bands and difrences in sound (you could put canterburry in phsyce/space and zheul in avant but PA dosn't)
 
 
 
But more importantly death metal can be progressive, given it isn't always but I find it hard to believe that simply because of a vocal style you find these bands not to be progressive. I understand how you may not like grunts but you should judge the music on its musical merits not on poorly formed steriotypes. After all at a certain point Yes just becomes high pitched meaningless jibberish singing and noodley playing, and that makes them all the better.
 
as for your last comment, NOT EVRY METAL BAND IS IN THE ARCHIVES! NOT EVRY BAND THAT IS SINGS ABOUT THE DEVIL! MOST DON'T! AND THOSE THAT DO, FINE YOU DON'T HAVE TO LISTEN. I SUGGEST YOU ACTUALLY HEAR THE LYRICS AND PLAYING AND DO  SOME REASEARCH BEFORE GIVING YOUR JUDGEMENT!!!!
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
Back to Top
Proletariat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1882
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 19:34
Originally posted by Squonkman Squonkman wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

You should check out this topic:
Announcing the Prog-Metal split

And there are three categories:


 
 
you are right---I missed that. its even worse than I thought. I will have to edit my thread title.
 
Still don't see why it can't fit under the umbrella Prog metal, with the other two as subcategories. I will go back and read the thread.
 
I am a big Porcupine Tree and Riverside fan, so its not like I don't like some hard driving progressive metal, if it carries with it the hallmarks of what progressive music is all about. But I hear too many pedestrian bands that do little more than shout, grunt and play almost unlistenable sludge thrash metal that has been done over and over, by many better bands, for a long time, being thrown into this "progressive metal' umbrella. If you aren't doing something beyond what Sabbath and their progeny etc already has done, I think we have to be careful about making this too much of a metal site and less of a progressive rock site.
 
Im gunna have to bash you again but EVRY metal artist on here is on here for their prog and not their metal. They all have done more with their music than sabbath just listen to it, if you like your prog in the rock realm and not the metal realm then that is ok just don't bash on those of us who can appretiate the extremes of prog.
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 19:34
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

* munch munch munch* LOL


indeed, could be a good one


Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 19:47
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

* munch munch munch* LOL


indeed, could be a good one




yes... it could..  this popcorn is stale...

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=42840&KW=prog+metal+split

The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Squonkman View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 08 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 19:49
Originally posted by Proletariat Proletariat wrote:

Originally posted by Squonkman Squonkman wrote:

progressive metal, extreme tech/progressive metal........and experimental/post metal.
 
Why can't this stuff fit under the umbrella of progressive metal as subgenres?
I think one can get carried away with overcategorizing everything. I mean, I already have a hard time with calling some of these metal bands progressive in the first place---in many cases you could make a case that they are regressive. And how is death metal progressive? can someone really explain that one? At a certain point, if its all grunting and sludge metal, is it really progressive?
 
I'm all for a big tent, but we also have to be careful about keeping progressive music as an electic arena of music, and not home to every shouting thrash playing maniac who comes along and sings songs about the devil.
I agree that they could still fit under one umbrella but they are good seperate because of the number of bands and difrences in sound (you could put canterburry in phsyce/space and zheul in avant but PA dosn't)
 
 
 
But more importantly death metal can be progressive, given it isn't always but I find it hard to believe that simply because of a vocal style you find these bands not to be progressive. I understand how you may not like grunts but you should judge the music on its musical merits not on poorly formed steriotypes. After all at a certain point Yes just becomes high pitched meaningless jibberish singing and noodley playing, and that makes them all the better.
 
as for your last comment, NOT EVRY METAL BAND IS IN THE ARCHIVES! NOT EVRY BAND THAT IS SINGS ABOUT THE DEVIL! MOST DON'T! AND THOSE THAT DO, FINE YOU DON'T HAVE TO LISTEN. I SUGGEST YOU ACTUALLY HEAR THE LYRICS AND PLAYING AND DO  SOME REASEARCH BEFORE GIVING YOUR JUDGEMENT!!!!
 
 
I never said that every metal band is listed on PA. I have heard enough "progressive metal" or what is supposed to be "progressive metal", particularly in the death metal area, that I know when I hear it, I think to myself---what is progressive about that? A record shop I frequented carried a lot of progressive music and he hired a coworker that started turning the shop into more metal. He was particularly fond of death metal and was constantly playing it every time I was in there browsing. He too contended a lot of the stuff fit into "progressive". All I heard was a lot of grunting and thrashing away mindlessly with simple 3 chord riffs that was not in the least bit progressive. I even tried a few albums to see if I was missing something, and I either started laughing out loud, or headed for the Tylenol right away. Like I said, there is some melodic metal like Riverside and Opeth that is fine. For instance, the Riverside lead vocalist can actually sing and has a good voice. But way too much of what passes for Progressive metal is simply screaming and shouting with little talent at all, over the top of mindless three chord thrashing that isn't the least bit progressive. I need to hear some evidence of talent, some progression in the music, or some meaningful lyrics beyond Satan worship to even begin to consider it "progressive".
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 19:54
 ^ then why don't you start by trying one of the Ex/Tech bands that are here on PA, or some Postmetal (or heck, even some Mathrock).. the majority of bands added are progressive and those responsible for adding them know the difference btw standard metal - of which there is a HUGE amount out there - and ProgMetal, of which there is less

..and what does some uninformed dweeb with bad taste in a record store have to do with this?








Edited by Atavachron - April 15 2008 at 19:57
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 19:57
*yawn^

repeat after me children..

we all have different notions of what is prog and what is not...  this site does it bests to reflect them.. some you will agree with some you won't. 

if someone thinks that stuff, prog metal.. or large parts of what is here as prog metal is not prog... or even good music.. more power to you.  But there are others that see differently.  Move on and accept that others see music.. and prog differently.

this thread has the life expectancy of the pizza I am about to devour.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 20:02
"or some meaningful lyrics beyond Satan worship to even begin to consider it "progressive"."

LOL

He makes it sound like its common.  Prog-metal is not my area of expertise, but can anyone estimate how many bands in the genre actually "worship" Satan?  Come on....Evil%20Smile....worship me.....hahhhhaaa


Back to Top
Proletariat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1882
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 20:14
Originally posted by Squonkman Squonkman wrote:

Originally posted by Proletariat Proletariat wrote:

Originally posted by Squonkman Squonkman wrote:

progressive metal, extreme tech/progressive metal........and experimental/post metal.
 
Why can't this stuff fit under the umbrella of progressive metal as subgenres?
I think one can get carried away with overcategorizing everything. I mean, I already have a hard time with calling some of these metal bands progressive in the first place---in many cases you could make a case that they are regressive. And how is death metal progressive? can someone really explain that one? At a certain point, if its all grunting and sludge metal, is it really progressive?
 
I'm all for a big tent, but we also have to be careful about keeping progressive music as an electic arena of music, and not home to every shouting thrash playing maniac who comes along and sings songs about the devil.
I agree that they could still fit under one umbrella but they are good seperate because of the number of bands and difrences in sound (you could put canterburry in phsyce/space and zheul in avant but PA dosn't)
 
 
 
But more importantly death metal can be progressive, given it isn't always but I find it hard to believe that simply because of a vocal style you find these bands not to be progressive. I understand how you may not like grunts but you should judge the music on its musical merits not on poorly formed steriotypes. After all at a certain point Yes just becomes high pitched meaningless jibberish singing and noodley playing, and that makes them all the better.
 
as for your last comment, NOT EVRY METAL BAND IS IN THE ARCHIVES! NOT EVRY BAND THAT IS SINGS ABOUT THE DEVIL! MOST DON'T! AND THOSE THAT DO, FINE YOU DON'T HAVE TO LISTEN. I SUGGEST YOU ACTUALLY HEAR THE LYRICS AND PLAYING AND DO  SOME REASEARCH BEFORE GIVING YOUR JUDGEMENT!!!!
 
 
I never said that every metal band is listed on PA. I have heard enough "progressive metal" or what is supposed to be "progressive metal", particularly in the death metal area, that I know when I hear it, I think to myself---what is progressive about that? A record shop I frequented carried a lot of progressive music and he hired a coworker that started turning the shop into more metal. He was particularly fond of death metal and was constantly playing it every time I was in there browsing. He too contended a lot of the stuff fit into "progressive". All I heard was a lot of grunting and thrashing away mindlessly with simple 3 chord riffs that was not in the least bit progressive. I even tried a few albums to see if I was missing something, and I either started laughing out loud, or headed for the Tylenol right away. Like I said, there is some melodic metal like Riverside and Opeth that is fine. For instance, the Riverside lead vocalist can actually sing and has a good voice. But way too much of what passes for Progressive metal is simply screaming and shouting with little talent at all, over the top of mindless three chord thrashing that isn't the least bit progressive. I need to hear some evidence of talent, some progression in the music, or some meaningful lyrics beyond Satan worship to even begin to consider it "progressive".
Isis - So did we:
Our skin worn thin
Our bones exposed
Life reduced to ticks
From forest caves and azure skies
We crashed upon this earth
The years they passed and so did we
But, resistance would be brought
 
Meshuggah - Future breed machine
mechanical thoughts i now concieve no
longer me always to see inanity millions
to be units like me eternally human
patterns copied dissected distorted
completed to fit the machine the nerve
fibres give in to cords to the unknown

dark? yes, but no satan refrences and much closer to Edgar Allen Poe than Alistar Crowley

while a band you do admit to liking (Opeth) does refrence satan
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
Back to Top
Proletariat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1882
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 20:16
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

*yawn^

repeat after me children..

we all have different notions of what is prog and what is not...  this site does it bests to reflect them.. some you will agree with some you won't. 

if someone thinks that stuff, prog metal.. or large parts of what is here as prog metal is not prog... or even good music.. more power to you.  But there are others that see differently.  Move on and accept that others see music.. and prog differently.

this thread has the life expectancy of the pizza I am about to devour.
OK im done, you may consider yourself repeated
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 22:21
This has been done over and over again......
 
The four founding members(of which I am one)of the PMT got together to try to organize the sub-genre here that we are very passionate about.We spent over 2 months,on an almost daily basis,for hours and hours on end,talking on IM and we created 7 sub-genres of prog metal,then narrowed it down to five.We listened to EVERY PM band in the archives and placed them in these subs.The owners rejected our proposal because it was a little complicated.
 
After 2 years we decided to try again,this time with three subs that we thought we could fit all of the bands here in prog metal in.The reason behind this is bands like Opeth,Edge of Sanity,Age of Silence,Behold...the Arctopus,Between the Buried and Me,and Isis aren't all strictly prog metal in the traditional sense.We thought that people new to prog metal might be able to better explore the wide range of prog metal bands that we have added here if we re-organized prog metal.
 
You have to face it,there are progressive metal bands out there that don't sound anything like Dream Theater,but are widely accepted as progressive metal everywhere else.Like any genre of music,prog metal is constantly evolving and changing,and there are kids out there who grew up loving bands like DT that are now in bands and they are putting their own spin on things.
 
This was not a rash decision,this was the result of years of work and a ton of debate.The PMT alone have more than doubled the number of prog metal bands here since it's inception,a fact of which I take great pride in.We all do this in our spare time,and after an evening of devil worship,sacrificing virgins and drinking goats blood,I find it nice to come here and unwind by ruining the archives and the site itself.Tongue


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.188 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.