Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - We have some serious problems
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWe have some serious problems

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Ghandi 2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 17 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1494
Direct Link To This Post Topic: We have some serious problems
    Posted: April 17 2007 at 23:59
This is an excellent website, but I have recently noticed some very serious problems, some of which need to be correctly immediately.

First of all, the Avant-prog, Krautrock and Canterbury descriptions are blatantly stolen from allmusic.com with no credit given whatsoever, as was that awful neo-prog definition before the neo-prog team finally got around to changing it. This is disgusting and completely unacceptable. It's bad enough to use allmusic's definitions (when, as a separate, resource we should have original content to provide people), but to plaigarize is just...I don't even know what you guys must have been thinking when you did that. In addition, someone should write something for the Post-rock description because it looks really weird when it's the only one that uses Wikipedia's entry. Really, we are the number one result for "prog," we should be able to have something up without having to use Wikipedia. There's some broken HTML in the spacerock description.

Secondly, some of the bios need to be cleaned up. As an objective resource, statements such as "there is often a gap of 5 years between each studio album, but they are always masterpieces""you'd have to be primordial ooze not to think this is brilliant", or the breathless praise given to Neal Morse really should not be tolerated. What's possibly even worse are the bios that say "they remind me of Band X" or "I recommend album X" (I don't remember any specific examples of the latter at the moment) because besides that use of first person is unscholarly and unprofessional in a resource, the reader usually has no idea who is speaking since a lot of the bios are uncredited.

Lastly, I have no problem with the front page referencing micky and GR, but it's pretty damn stupid when the link goes to a thread in the collab zone that the vast majority of the visitors to this website are unable to see...
How do you think a new visitor is going to feel when he clicks that link the for first time and finds that he does not have permission to view it, even after he signs up for a forum account? What will he think that says about us and our website? Especially since he likely will not even know about the existence of the collab zone.

Edited for grammar and slight additions.

Edited by Ghandi 2 - April 18 2007 at 00:15
Back to Top
Chris H View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 08 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 8191
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 00:04
Nice rant, have a clappieClap
Beauty will save the world.
Back to Top
Proletariat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1882
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 00:04
Those are all problems, that last one pisses me off the most though. I clicked it the verry first time I came to this site.
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
Back to Top
OpethGuitarist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: June 25 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1655
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 00:04
^^

that addition was added by Max so I doubt it will be changed
back from the dead, i will begin posting reviews again and musing through the forums
Back to Top
moreitsythanyou View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: April 23 2006
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 11682
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 00:09
Actually, I recall the Spock's Beard biography being extremely biased.
Anyway, I can tell that there are small changes that can be made to heighten the accuracy and legitimacy of the site and they should be done eventually, but I'm sure there are more important things that the webmasters and collaborators have to worry about
<font color=white>butts, lol[/COLOR]

Back to Top
Ghandi 2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 17 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1494
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 00:19
Oh wow, you're right, the Spock's Beard bio is even worse. Hahaha, "This adventurous band" [has] "by far the best progressive rock album of the decade."
Back to Top
enteredwinter View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 05 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 501
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 00:23
Assuming you are right about the plagiarism (I don't have time to check it all out), then I agree with you 100%.

About the band biographies, the Tool and Thinking Plague ones are definitely too biased and even offensive in the case of the latter, but I don't see much wrong with the Neal Morse one. Yeah, it praises him too much, but unless I missed something egregious, it doesn't seem like it really requires editing.

About the wedding link, well, I agree that it just looks odd on the front page, particularly since clicking it brings the average person nowhere. It's just confusing to the average person who doesn't understand what amounts to an inside joke, and I agree that it should be taken off, but I don't think it's a huge deal.

Overall, good rant, you bring up some important points.



Edited by enteredwinter - April 18 2007 at 00:23
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 03:30

Which of these issues do you feel you would like to take on Ghandi?

Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20042
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 07:37

Just wondering - how do you know the descriptions were "stolen" from allmusic and not vice versa?

I agree about the micky and GR reference (sorry guys). I assume it's a temporary reference and will be removed eventually.

Back to Top
avestin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 18 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 12625
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 09:19
I have the same feelings about the ZART definition and I suggested to the team to revise it and we are actually discussing these days about it and it will change.
 
I don't know who wrote those first definitions but they should be our "own" and they also lack much info (especially the RIO one).
 
You can see some of the discussion in the RIO Drop In Centre thread. The rest of it is in the collab zone.
 
We will update it.
But give us some time, as this is a team effort and we are not time synchronated and we do have jobs and life outside PA, and other duties here in PA so it might take a while.
 
Smile
 
 
 


Edited by avestin - April 18 2007 at 09:24
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 09:23
"What's possibly even worse are the bios that say "they remind me of Band X"
 
Just to clarify something,one of the requirements when writing a bio for a band is that we mention bands that have a similar style.


Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 11:32
I've asked M@x to remove the wedding reference.
Back to Top
kazansky View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2006
Location: Indonesia
Status: Offline
Points: 5085
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 11:36
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

"What's possibly even worse are the bios that say "they remind me of Band X"
 

Just to clarify something,one of the requirements when writing a bio for a band is that we mention bands that have a similar style.

perhaps the statement could be rephrased to something that doesn't look like personal point of view. something like 'this band has similar sound/style with...' or such
The devil we blame our atrocities on is really just each one of us.
Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A² Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 13:14
You have to remember that this is a very large database. Some things were added a long time ago, before the genre teams even existed. Going through, and fixing all of the problems is an arduous task to say the least. We have done this in Symphonic, and others teams are working very hard as well. I have no doubt that all of the issues will be addressed, but it takes time. Remember, we are all volunteers here.

As for the Spock's Beard bio, I will check it out. We went through and wrote bios for all the bands that had little, or nothing at all. I'm sorry if we didn't take time to critique all of the existing ones.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20513
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 15:22
I thought the wedding link was funny
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Chus View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 15:29
About the bios. It's natural that some might use: "one of the best _______ of all time/ever/since ___"; not as biased as "this is THE best _________ of all time/ever/since_____"; the latter one needs to be fixed, but not the former, since it doesn't degrade other artists of the same vein nor does it degrade the artist himself. I agree we should redact our own biographies about artists.
Jesus Gabriel
Back to Top
progismylife View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 15:32
Some good points here Ghandi.

Maybe some extra help is need? Eh? Do you collaborators need another one? Wink, wink, nudge, nudge, know what I mean, know what I mean Wink
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 15:35
It was Hugues, but Raf felt it had run its course and I think she was right.

Edited by Easy Livin - April 18 2007 at 15:36
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 15:41
As Assaf said, we plan to rewrite the RIO/Avant-prog bio eventually.  I have been busy this week, but I'll have a look at it and see if I can write a draft.

Again, as Assaf said, be patient, things will be put right eventually.
Back to Top
Ghandi 2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 17 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1494
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2007 at 22:28
Originally posted by Chus Chus wrote:

About the bios. It's natural that some might use: "one of the best _______ of all time/ever/since ___"; not as biased as "this is THE best _________ of all time/ever/since_____"; the latter one needs to be fixed, but not the former, since it doesn't degrade other artists of the same vein nor does it degrade the artist himself. I agree we should redact our own biographies about artists.
I disagree because as a resource, the bios should not express any personal opinion. If it were to say "it was hailed by critics as one of the best symphonic albums of the '90s" (assuming that were a true statement), then that would be ok, but stating that as fact is not, in my opinion.
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Which of these issues do you feel you would like to take on Ghandi?
Hahaha, that's not a very nice answer. :P I wouldn't mind cleaning up some of the bios, but that's not really my responsibility, now is it? If I were to be a collab, then it would be, but trying to turn this back on me when I am raising very valid issues is just silly.
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

"What's possibly even worse are the bios that say "they remind me of Band X"
 
Just to clarify something,one of the requirements when writing a bio for a band is that we mention bands that have a similar style.
That's not the problem; I don't think the use of the first person pronoun is appropriate. Obviously, mentioning other groups that sound similar is helpful and possibly even necessary.
Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Just wondering - how do you know the descriptions were "stolen" from allmusic and not vice versa?
AllMusicGuide has existed since 1991 and the website has been up since 1995, for one thing. For another thing, as a professional site, they're not going to steal a description from a prog site.
 
You don't even need to change it immediately. I know how powerful the forces inertia and even apathy are, especially on the internet. All I ask is that you credit it until you get a new one up. Really, it's not that hard to edit in "Copyright Allmusic.com" or something at the bottom.
 
I can wait, but I felt that if I didn't bring this issues up, they would never get resolved since, no offense to you intended because I know how it is, inertia is extremely powerful, and it's very easy to put off revising that bio ad infinitem. I've done things like that myself on other websites.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.