Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
selling_echoes
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 07 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 113
|
Topic: Philosophy. Posted: February 01 2005 at 21:18 |
Don't ask me why, but I've always linked music to emotions, and
therefore progressive music (because what's better? ) to humans and how
we think. This is the first philosophy thread, as pretentious as that
might sound -- I hope you guys have things to say.
Crap. I might as well break the ice and start this.
Here lies my faith.
I believe in the existance of a superior force that links us all
together somehow, that humans are born for a reason, and we go through
life trying to find that reason, as subconscious as that might be. I
believe that humans are born pure, and that society was made to help
us, but ended up corrupting us. A very Lumières vision, I suppose.
I think we are advancing too fast, that technology is now exploiting us
instead of vice versa, and that if humans do not wake up and see what
they are doing to themselves ... we are well on our way to
self-destruction. It takes an enormous amount of faith in humanity to
make it work, to wake us all up from this illusion that's built itself
on top of our hearts, layers and layers of impressions and biased
judgement.
All we can do is return to the beginning. To intuition and heart.
We are our worst enemies, but we are also the only extended, helping hand.
I guess here's me hoping that this will turn into an inspiring, continuous discussion.
Your turn, my friends.
Edited by selling_echoes
|
|
Hangedman
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 03 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1261
|
Posted: February 01 2005 at 22:29 |
Put a lot of thought into this thread?
Well I'll give it a shot. (WARNING: may offend creationists, just my personal beliefs)
I think creation was a fluke, that "god" im most likely some sort of insubstaintial form of energy which can create something out of nothing, which both exists and never existed. Everywhere and nowhere, etc... Earth happens to be a perfect planet for complex life to develop (possibly more, no way to prove it, very unlikely for life to be supported, but also uncountable amount of planets). Proper compunds were mixed, simple single celled organisms born, long process of evolution into human beings. Now heres the Philosophicle part. As humans we have evolved to the point where time can be spent on invention and abstract thinking. We have progressed to the point where we have become a danger to ourselves and the planet. We have also gained something called a conscience, and i think it is our new destiny to repair the damage we have done to the planet. As a species we are capable of almost anything. We, collectively, are on the doorstep of godhood. And as such, it SHOULD be our responsibility to protect and nuture the beautiful annomally that is life.
Wow, never thought id put that into words, even if it is that abbreviated
|
|
Velvetclown
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 01:57 |
THE FACT THAT A BELIEVER IS HAPPIER
THAN A SKEPTIC IS NO MORE TO THE POINT
THAN THE FACT THAN A DRUNKEN MAN IS
HAPPIER THAN A SOBER ONE
George Bernard Shaw
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 01:58 |
"that humans are born pure, and that society was made to help us, but ended up corrupting us"
We have to de-conditionnate ourselves from all the belief
we have been told.
We believe we know how the world is, whereas it's a a perfect mystery.
"All we can do is return to the beginning. To intuition and heart.
We are our worst enemies, but we are also the only extended, helping hand."
We have to return to body consciousness cause the "mental tapistry" created by our toughts made us think that there's only one boring world, the predictable one that society describes.
We have to reach the inner silence in order to forget ourselves and the world(cause this is the inner dialogue which makes our "world description" and our ego to exist) and to perceive the world without interpretation or, like would say Castaneda, to "stop the world".
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 02:00 |
It's a perfect mystery
how becomes a tree a tree
but there's something telling me
that
nothing is for nothing is for
nothing is for only one lifetime
learning to be
Cops at the door
No cops at the door
Cops at the door
No cops at the door
What a surprise!
She looked in the cupboard
and found the eyes
in the suitcase
On the Isle of Everywhere
it becomes a man to share
all and everything he cares for
everyone is everybody else is
slowly melting themselves
together again
Look up in the air
The Octave Doctor's there!
And when he strokes his gong
Your middle eye comes on
What a surprise!
She looked around for Zero
But he'd lost his eyes
In a fruitcake
Gong/You
|
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 03:50 |
"I think creation was a fluke, that "god" im most likely some sort of insubstaintial form of energy which can create something out of nothing, which both exists and never existed. Everywhere and nowhere, etc..."
It seems that there's no god, human-like with a long white beard.
Probably an impersonnal energy form who or which doesn't care for us, individual ego trapped into our personnal hells.
It even seems that that this "creator" creates us in order to fed himself with our ego...
Exactly the same for us when we rise animals to eat them...
Eventually, this is another way to see the reincarnation concept, in which you have to "loose " your ego, to die, like the saddhus in india, to break the reincarnation wheel, in order to reach total freedom.
|
|
maani
Special Collaborator
Founding Moderator
Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 10:13 |
This discussion seems to be as much about "religion" as it is about "philosophy." In that regard, I have two queries:
1. Is there a "line" between "religion" and "philosophy," and, if so, what is it?
2. If not, is religion a philosophy? Is philosophy a religion?
Peace.
|
|
Joren
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 10:43 |
Sometimes I believe in myself. Sometimes I believe in some others. Sometimes I believe in music and other art.
Sometimes I don't believe in anything.
|
|
Garion81
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 11:12 |
Snow cuts loose from the frozen Until it joins with the african sea In moving it changes it’s cold and it’s name The reason I come and go is the same Animal game for me You call it rain But the human name Doesn’t mean sh*t to a tree
If you don’t mind heat in your river and Fork tongue talking from me Swim like an eel fantastic snake Take my love when it’s free Electric feel with me You call it loud But the human crowd Doesn’t mean sh*t to a tree
Change the strings and notes slide Change the bridge and string shift down Shift the notes and bridge sings Fire eating people Rising toys of the sun Energy dies without body warm Icicles ruin your gun
Water my roots the natural thing Natural spring to the sea Sulphur springs make my body float Like a ship made of logs from a tree Redwoods talk to me Say it plainly The human name Doesn’t mean sh*t to a tree
Snow called water going violent Damn the end of the stream Too much cold in one place breaks That’s why you might know what I mean Consider how small you are Compared to your scream The human dream Doesn’t mean sh*t to a tree
Grace Slick 1969
Edited by Garion81
|
"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
|
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 11:22 |
maani wrote:
This discussion seems to be as much about "religion" as it is about "philosophy." In that regard, I have two queries:
1. Is there a "line" between "religion" and "philosophy," and, if so, what is it?
2. If not, is religion a philosophy? Is philosophy a religion?
Peace.
|
My thoughts exactly.
The difference between the two.
Philosophy is a method of rationalising and imagining, religion is the applied method of philosophy defining the parameters, doctrine and dogma's of believe.
Edited by tuxon
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
sigod
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 12:10 |
This is the kind of thread that could devour both minds and opinions in
a few seconds flat. I'm not sure anyone could do justice to their
worldview in the space of a few paragraphs. If I could get the meaning
of life onto the front of a T-shirt I'd be a happy man and make a
million.
Hey, maybe that IS the meaning of life...
Edited by sigod
|
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
|
Hangedman
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 03 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1261
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 17:16 |
oliverstoned wrote:
"I think creation was a fluke, that "god" im most likely some sort of insubstaintial form of energy which can create something out of nothing, which both exists and never existed. Everywhere and nowhere, etc..."
It seems that there's no god, human-like with a long white beard. Probably an impersonnal energy form who or which doesn't care for us, individual ego trapped into our personnal hells. It even seems that that this "creator" creates us in order to fed himself with our ego... Exactly the same for us when we rise animals to eat them... Eventually, this is another way to see the reincarnation concept, in which you have to "loose " your ego, to die, like the saddhus in india, to break the reincarnation wheel, in order to reach total freedom.
|
If the "creator" is even sentinent. I think we are if anything accidental, but if thats true what an accident eh? , the buddist line of thought says that one can only find true happiness with "Nirvanva" which is in a sense coping with "nothing". If you can accept the possibility that you may no longer exist after you die an embrace it, happiness will be yours.
|
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 17:20 |
Great believe this boedism. If you embrace the emptiness of the void and seize to excist you will excist in a happier state
contradiction?
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
Hangedman
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 03 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1261
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 17:29 |
maani wrote:
This discussion seems to be as much about "religion" as it is about "philosophy." In that regard, I have two queries:
1. Is there a "line" between "religion" and "philosophy," and, if so, what is it?
2. If not, is religion a philosophy? Is philosophy a religion?
Peace.
|
Well maani, it has turned out that way. Most people's philosophies are based on thier system of beilliefs, or thier system of beliefs based on some ancestor's (or divine being's) philosophies or "laws". Philosophy and religion (or faith) often go hand in hand, and overlap.
I suppose the line itself is Faith (or religion) has to do with answering the unanswerable, and what a human being should and shouldnt do. All of the earliest western philosophers (greek of course) all started thier musings with the creation of the universe. This is important to philosophy because, for example; if you believe that some sort of all powerfull being wathces over you and judges you, you will behave yourself according to his will or suffer the consequences. This is going to greatly effect what you think is the proper behavior for a human being. Philosophie's earliest definiton that i can think of of the top of my head (for reference this is from my textbook on ancient western history, i cant remember the name and the musical box is borrowing it right now) is "To explain what it is to be a human being" this entails mostly, what we are here for.
Theres my best shot, I hope this clarifies your questions.
|
|
Hangedman
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 03 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1261
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 17:30 |
tuxon wrote:
Great believe this boedism. If you embrace the emptiness of the void and seize to excist you will excist in a happier state
contradiction?
|
haha yes, but a nice thought.
|
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 17:32 |
What is the purpose of philosophy?
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
Hangedman
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 03 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1261
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 17:41 |
^ To explain what it is to be a human being, and what we should do as humans.
|
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 17:42 |
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 17:47 |
Why? Why?
|
|
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Posted: February 02 2005 at 17:49 |
taking the Socratarian road.
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.