Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
LakesideRitchie
Forum Newbie
Joined: August 30 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 18
|
Topic: "In the Court" the first real prog album? Posted: March 07 2006 at 12:21 |
Was KC's "In the Court of the Crimson King" the first real prog album ever, as is often said? The problem is in the definition for progressive music. Was it really the Beatles, The Moody Blues or Procol Harum who were first? IMHO The Beatles were progressive in a way, so their presence on this site is just, but if you define progressive music as music that will hardly hit the charts, often containing long tracks, mostly instumental, with a high rate of "anti-notes", King Crimson was certaintly the first band to release a real "prog" album with a capital "P" !!!
Edited by LakesideRitchie
|
 |
erik neuteboom
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 27 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 7659
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 12:48 |
King Crimson their first album has obvious echoes from Colosseum and The Moody Blues, these bands along with The Nice, Vanilla Fudge and Procol Harum spearheaded the progressive rock movement in my opinion. Perhaps you can say that In The Court Of The Crimson King was the first symphonic rock album?
|
 |
akin
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 976
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 12:50 |
LakesideRitchie wrote:
Was KC's "In the Court of the Crimson King"
the first real prog album ever, as is often said? The problem is in the
definition for progressive music. Was it really the Beatles, The Moody
Blues or Procol Harum who were first? IMHO The Beatles were progressive
in a way, so their presence on this site is just, but if you define
progressive music as music that will hardly hit the charts, often
containing long tracks, mostly instumental, with a high rate of
"anti-notes", King Crimson was certaintly the first band to release a
real "prog" album with a capital "P" !!!
|
Progressive will hardly hit the charts? Nope. Lots of progressive rock
albuns from seventies were number one or at least in Top 40.
Long tracks? Not at all. Gentle Giant rarely did songs over 7 minutes and they are for sure progressive.
Mostly instrumental? There is no relation between the progressive and
the instrumental parts. Some songs like The Battle of Epping Forest,
Thick as a Brick, A Passion Play, Most of the Zappa work for example,
have huge lyrics and the instrumental parts don't last too much.
Well, if you define progressive rock the way you said above, ok. The
problem is that those things mentioned are not the characteristics of
progressive rock for great part of progressive rock fans. And the term
was created when these bands were all mainstream and lots of other
bands were considered progressive rock. The definition is more
subjective than objective and it was made almost 40 years ago, so it's
difficult to us now determine what is progressive rock or not. To some,
maybe Genesis, Yes, Jethro Tull, Pink Floyd, Emerson, Lake and Palmer
and King Crimson don't fit in his own definition of progressive rock.
But we all know that Yes, Genesis, Emerson, Lake and Palmer, Jethro
Tull, etc. were synonym of progressive rock at their time and even
nowadays.
|
 |
eddietrooper
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 27 2006
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 940
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 13:16 |
King Crimson's first album showed clear similarities with The Moody Blues, specially in the musical atmosphere of songs like Epitaph and In the Court of the Crimson King. But the difference is the greater musicianship and much more complexity of King Crimson's musical structures. From that point of view I would consider it as the first true prog rock album.
|
 |
BebieM
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 01 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 854
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 13:34 |
First prog album? CERTAINLY!
Best prog album? maybe ....
|
 |
akin
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 976
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 14:45 |
eddietrooper wrote:
King Crimson's first album showed clear
similarities with The Moody Blues, specially in the musical atmosphere
of songs like Epitaph and In the Court of the Crimson King. But the
difference is the greater musicianship and much more complexity of
King Crimson's musical structures. From that point of view I would
consider it as the first true prog rock album. |
Greater musicianship and more complexity? Ok, a great number of Moody
Blues songs are short, but the longer songs like House of Four
Doors/Legend of a Mind, Om, Have You Heard/The Voyage/Have you Heard,
My Song show great musicianship and complexity. The main difference
probably is that Moody Blues did conceptual albuns with lots of songs
while King Crimson did long conceptual songs.
|
 |
ken4musiq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 14:47 |
People need a place to start and this album, which hit the 25 spot in America was a popular album and this a place to start. I think there is a problem when you start to define the history of a genre by the points of entry into the mainstream or to limit it by key moments or artists.
The Court was one of the earliest recordings to use 16 tracks. Sgt. Peppers used eight and before that the Beatles used four. In its day, it must have made quite an impact. Instrumentally it is unique for a rock album. Ian McDonald used a range of reeds including the bass clarinet, which Miles had used on Bitch's Brew. With the layered tracking it is quite interesting. Michael Giles is also one of the great (the great) prog rock drummers. His use of the cymbals and reliance on the tom toms is quite innovative. He often does not play a basic rock beat but comes up with an interesting way to create a rhythmic track with the cymbals, snare, toms and highhat. Bruford learned a lot from him, I am sure. The use of the mellotron throughout it also quite distinctive. It often has these repetitive themes that give it an ethereal, surreal quality and grants the album a contemplative pallette.
It is strange that people consider the jazz aspects of this album as innovative when it is really only the opening track that has an extended jazz-like solo and the instrumental stuff on this album is not something that you would hear in jazz, I don't think so at least. That whole choppy rhythymic bit, for example. It is something you would hear in progressive rock.
|
 |
eddietrooper
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 27 2006
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 940
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 15:02 |
akin wrote:
eddietrooper wrote:
King Crimson's first album showed clear similarities with The Moody Blues, specially in the musical atmosphere of songs like Epitaph and In the Court of the Crimson King. But the difference is the greater musicianship and much more complexity of King Crimson's musical structures. From that point of view I would consider it as the first true prog rock album. |
Greater musicianship and more complexity? Ok, a great number of Moody Blues songs are short, but the longer songs like House of Four Doors/Legend of a Mind, Om, Have You Heard/The Voyage/Have you Heard, My Song show great musicianship and complexity. The main difference probably is that Moody Blues did conceptual albuns with lots of songs while King Crimson did long conceptual songs.
|
The moody Blues, which I like very much, never wrote anything remotely near the complexity and originality of "21st Century Shizoid man". This song by itself was , by my point of view, a revolutionary change in the way to understand music, and there was no other piece of music like that at that time. Laregely more revolutionary than any release by the Moodies. In fact the Moody Blues didn't show much evolution along their seven classic albums. Take the seven first albums by King Crimson and you'll realize that they were really exploring a new genre adding new aspects in each release, unlike the Moodies.
Edited by eddietrooper
|
 |
akin
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 976
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 15:12 |
Well, I think the Moody Blues albuns are unique instrumentally too, see
the quantity of instruments played and their complete integration to
the songs (for example, sitar is much better incorporated than in
Beatles). The use of Mellotrons as Crimson uses was first made by Moody
Blues. They strenghtened the use of wind instruments in rock
(most of their early songs have flute, some of them long
passages). Many consider Days of Future Passed the first prog.
Others think it is Sgt Peppers. Others Zappa's Freak Out. If
anyone can listen to Seventh Sons' album Raga, will see that it is
pretty progressive (indo-folk genre), and it is from 64.
I think the main importance in this discussion is to not consider any
of these albuns the first pure progressive and so on. Because many
people has prejudice against the bands considered "proto-prog" because
they think every band will sound just psychedelic like Sgt Peppers,
while, of course, The Nice, Procol Harum and Moody Blues were miles
ahead The Beatles at those times.
|
 |
akin
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 976
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 15:16 |
eddietrooper wrote:
akin wrote:
eddietrooper wrote:
King Crimson's
first album showed clear similarities with The Moody Blues, specially
in the musical atmosphere of songs like Epitaph and In the Court of the
Crimson King. But the difference is the greater musicianship and
much more complexity of King Crimson's musical structures. From that
point of view I would consider it as the first true prog rock
album. |
Greater musicianship and more complexity? Ok, a
great number of Moody Blues songs are short, but the longer songs like
House of Four Doors/Legend of a Mind, Om, Have You Heard/The
Voyage/Have you Heard, My Song show great musicianship and complexity.
The main difference probably is that Moody Blues did conceptual albuns
with lots of songs while King Crimson did long conceptual songs.
|
The moody Blues, which I like very much, never wrote anything
remotely near the complexity and originality of "21st Century Shizoid
man". This song by itself was , by my point of view, a revolutionary
change in the way to understand music, and there was no other piece of
music like that at that time. Laregely more revolutionary than any
release by the Moodies. In fact the Moody Blues didn't show much
evolution along their seven classic albums. Take the seven first
albums by King Crimson and you'll realize that they were really
exploring a new genre adding new aspects in each release, unlike the
Moodies. |
21th century schizoid man is not so complex, just a agressive main riff
and jazz avantgarde solos in the middle. It is a great song for sure.
And King Crimson has many differences mainly because of the changes in
the line up. The first four are like a mixture of the pompous
mellotron-based compositions (which Moodies did very well) and jazz.
Then with Brufford and Wetton, the music changed much, but it is easy
to understand: only Fripp remained.
|
 |
Viajero Astral
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 16 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3118
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 15:19 |
IMO, ITCOTCK was the first great Progresive Rock album, but not the first prog album, the Prog Rock start with those bands of the end of 60's. The best doesnt mean the first.
|
|
 |
eddietrooper
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 27 2006
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 940
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 15:19 |
akin wrote:
Well, I think the Moody Blues albuns are unique instrumentally too, see the quantity of instruments played and their complete integration to the songs (for example, sitar is much better incorporated than in Beatles). The use of Mellotrons as Crimson uses was first made by Moody Blues. They strenghtened the use of wind instruments in rock (most of their early songs have flute, some of them long passages). Many consider Days of Future Passed the first prog. Others think it is Sgt Peppers. Others Zappa's Freak Out. If anyone can listen to Seventh Sons' album Raga, will see that it is pretty progressive (indo-folk genre), and it is from 64.
I think the main importance in this discussion is to not consider any of these albuns the first pure progressive and so on. Because many people has prejudice against the bands considered "proto-prog" because they think every band will sound just psychedelic like Sgt Peppers, while, of course, The Nice, Procol Harum and Moody Blues were miles ahead The Beatles at those times.
|
Yes, that's true. People who don't give a listen to bands like The moody Blues or Procol Harum just because they are "not true prog bands" don't know what they are missing. I highly recommend all these albums. Who cares which one was "real prog" after all.
|
 |
akin
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 976
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 15:30 |
Of course, what matters to me is that I have all the Moody Blues, Procol Harum and King Crimson albuns from that time.
|
 |
1-Armed Scissor
Forum Newbie
Joined: March 06 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 16
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 15:37 |
Progressive seems like a really broad genre so i dunno. I mean, the original term is only meant to say that its "entirely new stuff"
its too bad that that is King Crimson's best record and the others are sort of downhill from there
|
 |
video vertigo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1930
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 15:59 |
The first prog album was Days of Future Passed by the Moody Blues, clearly.
|
"The rock and roll business is pretty absurd, but the world of serious music is much worse." - Zappa
|
 |
Bj-1
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Online
Points: 31661
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 16:47 |
I think the first "real" prog album was Frank Zappa - Lumpy Gravy (1967).
|
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
 |
Rashikal
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 07 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 546
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 17:03 |
King Crimson's In The Court of The Crimson King is easily the most
progressive album in all of prog, it created symphonic prog, heavy
metal, and vocal distortion at the same time. Was it first? That's hard
to say. I would call it the most prog out of early prog, and the best.
|
 |
eddietrooper
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 27 2006
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 940
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 17:07 |
Rashikal wrote:
King Crimson's In The Court of The Crimson King is easily the most progressive album in all of prog, it created symphonic prog, heavy metal, and vocal distortion at the same time. Was it first? That's hard to say. I would call it the most prog out of early prog, and the best. |

|
 |
Witchwoodhermit
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 23 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 871
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 17:15 |
Days of Futures Past- Moody Blues. The blueprint of progressive rock.
|
Here I'm shadowed by a dragon fig tree's fan
ringed by ants and musing over man.
|
 |
The Ryan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 16 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 559
|
Posted: March 07 2006 at 17:18 |
With any genre that chooses to take mainstream by storm, often the creator of the genre isn't the breakthrough. Nirvana fits this mold as they didn't make that grungey-90's sound they had, the band was marketable as was King Crimson and the beginning of punk, and even the rock stars of the late 50s/early 60s (50s?! yes). The inventers are typically left in the dark, perhaps never even putting an album out, but In The Court of the Crimson King definitely gave the public what progressive rock was to be popular in years to come, and for that little piece of fame people say 'this is the first progressive rock album'. I disagree with it being the first album, but they were probably the first to claim major success with a prog-rock sound.
|
 |